Compass Minerals Intl Inc

We raised the midpoint of our full year adjusted EBITDA guidance range to 224 million based on solid results in the SALT business and positive momentum in the plant nutrition, partly offset by the planned sale of our Wynyard SOP operation. start to the winter, short-term market for the entire salt industry is really tight. Compass Minerals continues to focus on efficient and safe delivery of every ton of salt possible, understanding the critical role that we and others in the industry play in the communities we serve. In any given season, our ability to service excess market demand in season can be limited by the compressed timing of regional winter weather and any associated demand surge. We forward deploy SALT throughout the year across our depot network as there is meaningful lead time across our production and supply chain to reach many of the regions we serve, particularly mid-season. For reasons I'll discuss more in a moment, our ability to meet excessive demand if it materialized in this specific season was always going to be limited. We do not plan our business assuming that we will have above average winters, and we've been very clear for our commitment to managing inventories, maintaining financial discipline, and focusing on value over volume. I'll make a few comments on the changes to our outlook in the SALT segment, as we recognize that they may not be intuitive to the midst of a strong winter. What I want to make clear up front is that our guidance does not represent, quote unquote, a new normal for this kind of winter. Our plans for the business are expected to allow for more flexible operations in the future, and we have more work to do to get there. I'd first reiterate why we put our back-to-basics strategy in place beginning in 24. The company's prior approach was to operate so that never missed a big winner. I won't bore you this morning with the details of how that ended, but suffice to say that it directly led to excess inventory over multiple years, a stress balance sheet with all the adverse impacts on market value expected to break. We're committed not to repeat the mistakes of the past, made the right decision to align the business more closely with anticipated market demand and have managed inventories accordingly. Over time, as the balance sheet continues to improve and market dynamics adjust to historical norms, the optionality within our inventory management strategy will evolve. We've been very open that our inventory management plan could preclude our ability to meet excessive demand in fiscal 2026. Our inventory production planning are informed by three factors. The first two I just discussed. First, the customer level commitments and a desire to keep inventory levels closely aligned to market demand. And second, effective placement of salt inventories, BIA, or salt supply chain. Third factor is production rates and capabilities at the mines, which I'll now comment to. Godrich Mine is in a period of high development. The mine is currently developing a number of new mining panels, which require the construction of new underground infrastructure and ground support. New development panels inherently have higher costs and lower production rates than panels that are in full production. This is not a new issue and was incorporated in our initial guidance for the year. The development sequence is important as it governs our ability to produce at the higher end of historic production levels. Advancing these development panels will improve the optionality and flexibility within the production plan at Goddard's mine, but in the near term, the mine's ability to produce at the higher end of historical rates will be limited. Within this context, the production ramp up at Godrich mine in mid fiscal 2025 later than anticipated due to uncertainties around the applicability of the USMCA and subsequent hiring and qualifying of miners. Currently, Godrich is producing a significantly higher rate year on year, and we're generally pleased with the direction of travel regarding our production level. That being said, we have some more work to mitigate greater than anticipated unplanned downtime, as well as to further improve operating efficiencies. These factors are somewhat limiting in our ability to service incremental in-season demand, creating headwinds for production costs per ton. Working our way through these issues, including improvements to preventative maintenance and overhaul programs, to name a few. Despite those challenges, we still have a solid quarter in salt. Moving over to plant nutrition business, we continue to see momentum in our stories. Over the last year or so, we've talked a lot about improving the performance of the business, which is largely premised on restoring the health of the pond complex at Ogden. This is succeeding. As the pond complex continues to improve, the quality of the feedstock that goes into Ogden also improves, provides benefits on how the plant operates, drive costs down. We've continued to make progress on this initiative. We've seen product costs trend down. On the pricing front, our team has done a good job for maintaining market value over SOP portfolio. We're seeing a $20 improvement in price compared to our expectation. The decrease in anticipated sales volume relates to us prioritizing having SOP available to pursue additional domestic business over lower margin export opportunities. We announced in our press release yesterday that we have entered into an agreement to sell or win your SOP operation in Canada for $30.8 million, subject to customary closing conditions. Considering the improvements we're seeing in our Ogden operation, coupled with our read on future market conditions, we believe now is an opportune time to pursue this transaction, allowing us to further focus our efforts on North American leading producer of SOP. Improvements that we're seeing at Ogden are allowing us to increase our adjusted EBITDA guidance for the plant nutrition business by 8%, in a midpoint of $37 million, despite the sale of the Wynyard operation. We've talked before about the importance of returning this business to a level where it consistently carries a $40 million EBITDA handle. Absent a Wynyard sale, we would have grinded to this value in this quarter. We think that we have line of sight of getting there in the coming quarters without Wynyard. Next phase of improvement involves capital project to upgrade the dryer compaction plant which we expect to boost both operational efficiency and finance financial performance. As we look to the remainder of the year, we are focused on people, processes, and systems, and focused on executing our back-to-basics framework. This approach is anchored in five core priorities. Improving operational efficiencies and capabilities to enhance performance and reliability across the organization. reducing capital intensive by deploying resources in a disciplined manner, simplifying processes and eliminating unnecessary complexity to accelerate decision-making and improve accountability, maximize cashflow generation to support long-term value creation, and reducing leavens to reinforce financial resiliency and provide capital allocation flexibility. The balance sheet and financial health of the company continue to improve As I mentioned at the beginning of my remarks, our leverage ratio has improved significantly over the last year. We've grown confidence in continuing improvement in our leverage profile. We plan to begin conversations with the board about approaches around capital allocation. This is all consistent with the progression of our back to basics framework. As the first quarter results demonstrate, we are clearly making positive strides in improving our operational, commercial, and financial performance. Some of these improvements are visible now, such as the strong results we're seeing in plant nutrition business and the continuing improvement in our leverage program. Some of the fully optimized production in our salt mines will take more time to fully manifest themselves. We're committed to becoming a top-tier operator, grounded in financial strength and operational excellence. As a leadership team, we're focused on building a company with resiliency and flexibility to thrive over the long term. Our responsibility is to deliver consistency against our back-to-basics framework. Journey isn't finished, but progress is unmistakable. We're moving confidently towards the organization we know we can be. With that, I'll turn the call over to Peter for a review of our first quarter results.

Thanks, Ed. I'll begin by discussing our quarterly financial performance. As Ed noted earlier, this quarter marked the first time in several years that the company has reported quarterly net income and adjusted EBITDA more than doubled from the year before. In the SALT segment, Operating earnings improved year-over-year to $14.33 per ton, up $2.54, or 22%, and adjusted EBITDA per ton increased 2% to $19.61. Total salt volumes were up 37% compared to the prior year period. Highway de-icing volumes increased 43% year-over-year, while CNI volumes increased 14% over the same period. A higher proportion of highway de-icing sales volume in the current period resulted in overall salt segment pricing being relatively flat year over year, despite realizing higher highway de-icing and CNI sales prices of 6% and 2%, respectively, year over year. Salt segment revenue in the first quarter was $332 million compared to $242 million a year ago. Product cost per ton declined 7% to $50.20 while distribution cost per ton increased 6%. SG&A, attributable to the salt segment, improved by $1 million. Moving on to the plant nutrition segment, where we had a very positive business performance that is resulting in strong financial results. Year-over-year operating earnings increased approximately $9 million, while adjusted EBITDA improved by $8 million. This was driven by improvements in both pricing and cost structure, despite the anticipated decrease in sales tons we saw year-over-year. In addition, the average SOP sales price was up 13% to $687 per ton. Product cost per ton declined 2% to $520, while distribution cost per ton increased 2% to $93. Corporate overhead year-over-year was down 24% to $19 million for the quarter and is a reflection of the momentum in our multi-year cost control and continuous improvement initiatives focusing on back to basic process optimization and system utilization. Moving on to the balance sheet. The previous announced settlement related to Ontario mining tax dispute resulted in some meaningful changes on the balance sheet at the end of December. The increase in other current assets and the decrease in other non-current assets and other non-current liabilities are a result of that settlement. Those movements also impacted changes in working capital in the statement of cash flows. With respect to the company's financial position, at quarter end, we have liquidity of $342 million, comprised of $47 million of cash and revolver capacity of around $295 million. Ed mentioned our focus of delevering, and we continue to make good progress there. The ratio of total net debt to trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA at the end of the quarter was 3.6 times, down from 5.3 times from the comparable prior period. Looking ahead, I'll now make a few comments on the updated guidance for 2026. The range for SALT segment adjusted EBITDA in 2026 is now $230 million to $252 million. Ed previously commented on the operational dynamics within the SALT segment. Our guidance reflects an increase in expected sales tons, the benefit of which is being muted by headwinds and production costs mentioned earlier. Additionally, severe winters tend to put pressure on distribution costs as surges in network demand create suboptimal logistical conditions. It's important to note that notwithstanding these factors, adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to increase by approximately 200 basis points year over year. For the plant nutrition segment, the range for adjusted EBITDA in 2026 is now up to 34 million to 39 million on stronger margins and an improved cost structure. partially offset by lower expected sales volume and the impact of the wind yield sale. At the midpoint of the guidance, we expect a more than 300 basis point improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin year over year. The guidance range for adjusted EBITDA related to corporate overhead is unchanged, as is the range for our capital expenditures. As a result of these changes, the range for guidance for total company adjusted EBITDA for 2026 is up to $208 million to $240 million for a 2% increase at the midpoint. I'll now turn the call over for questions.

At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, please press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. We will pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Evan McCall with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. It's Evan on for Joel Jackson. Just wondering about the salt market and if the market is well supplied for the strong winter or are we seeing a rush for any imports? And is there a larger spot market than normal and does Compass have any excess tons to sell into it?

Well, good morning. This is Ed. As we said in our release and our just completed call, that the market is very tight as a result of the winter so far. You know, when we do our planning, there's a variety of things that we consider in terms of how we manage that, which could include some imports from time to time. Ben, do you want to pick that up?

Yeah, good morning, Evan. I think the market is exactly what I said. It's become tight. Winter has certainly trended ahead in terms of a straight calendarization. So that's something that the market hasn't seen in quite a few seasons. The ability for imports and opportunistic supply to play a role mid-season is difficult, just given the lead time of supply and transit. And so I think, you know, our anticipation is if the winter continues as it has up to date, the market will remain tight.

Thanks, if I could sneak one more in. How are the plans progressing for the new mill at Goderich? And also, when would you make a decision on this? And has the strong winter emboldened your decision to make the investment?

Well, there's really three projects associated with the new mill at Goderich Mine. The first that we've been working on for some years is what we call the East Main Drive, where we connect the current mining areas directly driving access directly to the east to tie into infrastructure. The second, and that's been going on for some period of time, some years. Second is what we call the 3B108 project, which is really connecting the shafts and the infrastructure itself to the East Main Drive. That project is really just getting underway, and it'll take a little while to complete that, but that's moving ahead. In terms of the new mill itself, it's in engineering. We've got a project team coming together on that. We're currently in the value engineering stage of that, and we should have things that we could talk about here over the next quarters.

Before going to the next question, again, if you would like to ask a question, press star 1 on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of David Silver with Freedom Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Yeah. Hi. Thank you. Good morning. I wanted to maybe start with a question about the SALT segment economics during the quarter. And in particular on the cost side. So, you know, if I was to kind of lay things out on a per ton basis, I guess production costs and also shipping and handling or logistics were, you know, higher, I guess, than a year earlier despite, you know, the higher volume. And I think you did in your prepared remarks that I think you talked about the development panels and whatnot. But I was curious, I mean, what would be driving up the logistics costs, the shipping and handling touch that, you know, it seemed to have kind of a meaningful impact on your per ton margins this quarter? Was there anything going unusual there, or is that something that will improve, I guess, as we move through the balance of the winter? Thank you.

Thanks, David. Appreciate that. You know, let me just say, as long as we're in the development sequence, which, you know, you measure in quarters, you know, well, not years, and start, you know, improving the production to development ratio in the mine, this is normal course things. for mining and the costs are always going to be a little bit higher just because of what we do to set up infrastructure, et cetera. But for the quarter itself, to answer your question directly, unit costs were down about 6% in terms of production and distribution costs were up about 6%. I'll pass this over to Peter and Ben to see if they've got anything else they'd like to add. Yeah, good morning, David.

I think as you look at the distribution costs, there's two factors in play. One are just some basic inflationary pressures on rates, which was clearly identified in our guidance. The other big thing that's occurring is because Q1 of this year was so robust compared to prior year, we're shipping salt across a much wider network to service the business. And so essentially, we're pushing salt and shipping it to further away destinations to meet the demand. which results in a little higher rates. So that's what you're seeing come together.

And, you know, just to follow up on that briefly, but, you know, you don't have to scan news sources very long before, you know, you read about salt shortages in particular metropolitan areas, you know, in December and January in particular. And, you know, I'm just wondering if that had an unusual, you know, kind of impact. In other words, were you forced, did you find yourself without enough salt in the right locations or were you supporting maybe another supplier who was tapped out and maybe, you know, tapped into your supply or whatever in a pinch? Just anything unusual in the field that you would call out that might have, you know, impacted, you know, the margin profile this quarter, the per ton margin profile this quarter, but especially on the logistics side.

Well, you know, Ben just spoke a little bit to the logistics side and really the delivery from further places away. You know, we take a lot of pride in meeting our obligations as a company in terms of our serving our customer base. And, you know, we operate to meet the commitments that we've made, you know, shortages, et cetera, you know, and we have a lot of people who, you know, would be approaching us for more salt. I think the net result of that is, you know, we'll see how the rest of the winter shakes out, but looking forward, then, you know, kind of, I might just say, industry-wide de-icing inventories, which are low, you know, is very constructive as we look forward and start planning for 26, 27 winter.

Okay. If I could just ask a question, I guess, about tax rates, and I guess that would be both nominal and also cash tax as well. So, during the quarter, You did have the unusual situation where your tax rate was, I guess, negative in the first quarter. And I know you've got kind of an evolving tax situation from the point of view of you should be solidly profitable this year on a reported basis, a little bit different than the last couple of years. Can you just speak to kind of how you see your tax positioning evolving this year? And I'm thinking about the valuation allowances. Will you be able to claim some offset, some profit with losses that maybe in the last couple of years you weren't able to do? And if you had an idea of what your cash tax situation looks like for full year 2026. That would be great. Thank you.

David, I think in part you're asking about the impact of the Ontario mining tax settlement that we met earlier this year. Recall that's been something hanging around the company for decades. We're very pleased to get that behind us. And that's, of course, had impact on some of the footnotes you'll see in the release. Please pass it over to Peter to give you a bit more detail on that.

Sure. And on that Ontario mining, you'll see it in both the balance sheet and cash flow and cash tax, which is a lot of what you're referring to. As to the full year, obviously, we're still early in the year. We know that the swings in the effective tax rate, it's a function of income in Canada, losses in the US, and it's relatively a small number for tax purposes, right? And that's causing, obviously, Lots of swing. We have to look at that post-evaluation allowance as well, and then let that thing roll through. Still early in the season as the utilization, and also we're looking at that valuation as well. So it's yet to be determined. Okay. Thank you very much.

I will turn the call back over to Edward Jolly, CAO for closing remarks.

Thank you, Kate. Thank you again for your interest in Compton Minerals. We're excited to see the advances that we're making under our Back to Basics framework. As I mentioned earlier, the company's had a solid quarter. We have positive metering in a number of areas. We reported positive net income for the quarter, the first time in a long time. Quarterly adjusted EBITDA more than doubled. Total net trailing 12-month debt decreased by almost two turns, and lastly, we increased our guidance for the full year. The journey isn't finished, but we're making unmistakable progress in being the company we know we can be. Please don't hesitate to reach out to Brent if you have any follow-up questions. We look forward to speaking to you next quarter, if not before. Make it a safe day. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining Humano Disconnect.