This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
12/14/2021
Welcome to Clara's Mortgage Trust Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Alex and I will be your conference facilitator today. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer period. To ask a question, you can press star 1 on your telephone keypads. I would now like to hand over the call to Arne Wynne, Vice President of Investor Relations for Claris Mortgage Trust. Please proceed.
Thank you. I'm joined by Richard Mack, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Claris Mortgage Trust, and Mike McGillis, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Claris Mortgage Trust. We also have Kevin Cullinan, Executive Vice President, who leads Emrex Originations, and Priyanka Garg, Executive Vice President who leads MREX Asset Management. Prior to this call, we distributed CMTG's earnings supplement. We encourage you to reference these documents in conjunction with the information presented on today's call. If you have any questions following today's call, please contact me. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call may include forward-looking statements which are uncertain and outside of CMTG's control. Forward-looking statements imply risk and uncertainty, and actual results may differ materially from expectations. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or correct any forward-looking statements if later events prove them to be inaccurate. In addition, we will also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. For non-GAAP reconciliations, please refer to the earnings supplement. I would now like to turn the call over to Richard.
Thank you, Ann, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. As many of you know, Clarus Mortgage Trust recently completed its initial public offering, marking an important milestone in our evolution. During the company's formative years, we made the strategic decision to scale the business before going public. We did that to provide our initial investors with a non-mark-to-market investment with a steady dividend, but more importantly, we believe that debuting as a public company with both scale and a multi-year track record with best position clariffs, or CMPG, with a lower cost of capital to fuel dividend growth. Since this is our first earnings call as a public company, I'd like to welcome our new investors and recognize and thank our foundational investors for getting us here. We appreciate all of your support and we look forward to sharing our progress with you in the quarters and years ahead. Let me begin today with a quick background on our company for those of you who may be new to CMTG. Our investment strategy is to focus on lending opportunities in the transitional commercial real estate sector that are secured by high quality assets with institutional grade sponsorship. Transitional CRE lending was dominated largely by banks, pretty .frank. However, today, non-bank alternative lenders such as CMTG are increasingly providing capital for this segment of the market. Transitional properties are assets that require some level of repositioning, renovation, leasing, development, or redevelopment in order to maximize value. Currently, we lend on assets located in the United States, where our sponsor, Mac Real Estate Group, has a significant presence, either through boots on the ground or existing infrastructure and or deep experience. One of CMTG's key differentiators is that we are affiliated with Mac Real Estate Group, a commercial real estate owner, operator, property manager, developer, investor, and lender associated roots dating back to the 1960s. Mack Real Estate Group, or MREG, has a proven track record and established a scaled platform with more than 220 employees across the U.S. CMTG is distinct from many alternative lenders in that we employ an ownership mindset towards lending. Our sponsors roots as an owner, operator, and developer with decades of real estate experience enables us to fully appreciate and understand our borrowers' collateral and business plan. We believe this vantage point enables us to underwrite transitional loans more effectively and ultimately be better capital partners to our borrowers. Our investment portfolio primarily comprises assets owned by premier commercial real estate institutions in addition to many repeat borrowers who choose us for the following reasons. we have proven ourselves time and again to be a dependable, reliable source of debt capital. We understand complexity and we can participate in large-scale institutional projects. And lastly, we have the expertise to create bespoke lending solutions for our borrowers. Our ownership mindset also serves as the foundation for how we manage risk and our investment portfolio. What this means is, in part, that we only lend on assets that we would want to own in markets we know well and a basis we find compelling. Fundamentally, we believe that taking an appropriate level of execution risk rather than basis risk and excess financial leverage by levering our balance sheet too much provides for better risk-adjusted returns to our investors. Past cycles have proven to us time and time again that it is extremely difficult to resolve problems that stem from excessive lending or excessive balance sheet leverage. At the loan level, we drive our underwriting process with a focus on assessing execution risk. It involves extensive analysis and due diligence that is reviewed by a cross-functional executive team from across our platforms. We also place an emphasis on structuring our loans in a way that allows us to mitigate risk and identify problems early. Finally, given our focus on basis, we often require borrowers to have significant subordinate capital to protect. This proactive approach to asset management also provides us with a competitive advantage in that it is continuous, comprehensive, and is supported across the broader MRAG organization throughout the life of the loan. Our asset management team is integrated into the originations process and monitors and holds our borrowers accountable to their business plans as reflected in the loan documents. When there are planned variances, our asset management team often collaborates with the broader MRAG platform in order to work with our borrowers to help effectuate positive outcomes. And because of our significant local management and development presence on the ground, we usually know about potential problems at the asset before the borrower reports them to us. Since commencing operations in 2015, we have originated over $12.6 billion of investments, which reflects the strength of our business model and origination's capabilities. Since our formation, we have not incurred any credit losses, and we have only taken over one loan out of the 95 we have originated. Lastly, CNTG has a weighted average IRR of 13.2% on our realized loans, which we are very proud of. Now turning to the quarter. During third quarter, we significantly increased CNTG's origination activity, closing more than $900 million in floating rate transitional loans which represents an annualized origination run rate in line with the $4 billion of originations CNTG achieved in 2018 and 2019 pre-COVID on a smaller capital base. We originated loans in several high-growth markets, such as Austin, Texas, and Atlanta, Georgia. Historically, we've been very active in coastal gateway markets, And recently, we've been capitalizing on the favorable demographic trends and underlying job and rent growth in other select markets. We have the benefit of following our equity investment groups lead into these markets. This is where we are most active on the equity side now, given our pre-COVID pivot and more recent acceleration of investments into these markets. We believe these high-growth markets offer attractive returns on a relative basis while providing CMTG with an opportunity to further diversify its portfolio. Back to our portfolio, during the quarter we also added industrial exposure and capitalized on attractive opportunities in certain out-of-favor asset classes such as the hospitality and office sectors. The largest loan we originated during the quarter was the refinancing of a $225 million loan on a hotel located in Savannah, Georgia. The collateral is a drive-to leisure asset that is duly constructed, luxury branded, and it is reporting strong occupancy at ADR despite the uneven recovery across the hospitality sector. We also closed a $167 million construction loan for an industrial project located in Atlanta that is fully leased to a global e-commerce firm for 15 years on a triple net basis. The borrower is a repeat borrower of ours who provide us with an exclusive opportunity to provide the lending solution on this project. And we were able to provide a solution because there were unique attributes related to the deal that we were able to effectively underwrite by working alongside our internal industrial development team. We believe that this investment is yet another illustration of the advantages of the AMAC Real Estate Group platform and our ability to cultivate deep, repeat borrower relationships and to underwrite complex transactions. Most of our recent investments speak to our ability to understand and price large, complex transactions. And because of our balance sheet capacity, we can serve as a capital provider to sophisticated borrowers on major institutional projects. CMTG seeks to originate loan balances of size, which is what we did during the quarter. Not only does this segment of the market play to our strengths, but there are only a handful of market participants who can originate transitional loans of this size. There continues to be healthy demand for transitional CRE loans and continued support from the banks who prefer to lend to us than to make these loans directly. As transaction activity has picked up and capital markets have stabilized, we've seen an increase in equity sponsors with dry powder looking to execute on transitional development and construction business plans, especially in many of the high-growth markets where supply is not currently able to keep up with demand. We expect this dynamic to continue in the medium term, increasing the demand for transitional lending for the foreseeable future. We have a robust investment pipeline that we anticipate closing in the coming weeks and into the first quarter of 2022. As we look to the future, we will continue to execute our investment strategy and proactively manage our portfolio with the objective of delivering an attractive dividend to our stockholders. On that note, we are pleased to share that we recently announced a fourth quarter 2021 dividend of $0.37. I would now like to turn the call over to Mike McGillis. Thank you again for your support and for listening. Thank you, Richard. For the third quarter of 2021, CMPG reported GAAP net income of $52.9 million, or $0.40 per share, and net distributable earnings of $45.3 million, or $0.34 per share. We paid a third quarter dividend of $0.37 per common share, At September 30, 2021, CMTG's book value per common share was $18.78. The four reflecting reserves for CECL book value per share was $19.28. As of September 30, CMTG's loan portfolio based on UPB was $6.4 billion with a weighted average all-in yield of 6.4%. During the quarter, we originated 905 million of loans with initial fundings of 745 million. For existing loans, total fundings during the period were 248 million. We also received 676 million in full or partial repayments, which is indicative of the strong transaction volume we're currently seeing in the market. We have constructed a well-diverse portfolio that reflects our ownership mindset our ability to price complexity, and our platform's experience as an owner, operator, and developer. Our portfolio is comprised primarily of transitional floating rate senior loans. As of quarter end, senior loans represented 93% of the portfolio, with the balance being subordinate loans, and the weighted average LTV of our loan portfolio is 66%. We are highly selective when it comes to our subordinate loan exposure as we look to be compensated for the risk associated with this structure. Our subordinate loans have a lower detachment point and a meaningfully higher all-in yield than the portfolio average. As of September 30th, 2021, the LTV and all-in yield for our subordinate loans was 63.5% and 11.3% respectively. The portfolio is highly diversified by collateral type as no single property type exceeds 20% of the portfolio. Loans against multifamily and for sale condo commercial real estate collectively represent 28% of the portfolio and have been a strategic focus for us. Coming out of the pandemic, we expect that concentration to increase as a percentage of the portfolio in the near term. Not only do we view these loans to be lower on the risk spectrum, but we also believe that we have the expertise to reduce risks associated with this asset type given our platform's expertise in residential development, ownership, and management. It's also worth noting that we do not originate loans secured by standalone retail assets, which is by design. Our collective view is that retail is overbuilt throughout the U.S., and the available returns do not sufficiently outweigh the secular risk associated with this asset class. As Richard mentioned, we've been diversifying our portfolio by geography, adding select high-growth markets to the portfolio, and reducing exposure to the New York City market. While we anticipate this trend to continue, New York will always be a core component of our portfolio. Our investment strategy is to lend on large transitional and complex assets, and New York City offers an abundance of these opportunities. We also have deep expertise in this market and organizationally have a large team here. Turning now to our internal risk ratings, our asset management team conducts a rigorous loan-by-loan quarterly review to determine a risk rating for each investment on a five-point scale. During the quarter, CMTG's weighted average risk rating improved to 3.0 compared to 3.1 for the prior quarter. With respect to certain loans, we've been observing favorable trends in the performance of the underlying collateral, supported by continued improvements in the broader economy. we take a conservative stance towards leverage. As a quarter end, our net debt to equity ratio and total leverage ratios were 1.8 times and 2.1 times our equity base, respectively. As you are aware, subsequent to the quarter end, we executed an IPO, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $103 million. As a result of the IPO, 7.3 million shares of redeemable common stock were converted into common stock. During our IPO process, we identified several key catalysts that we believe will help us increase our earnings and dividend profile over the next couple of years. First was repricing of our $763 million term loan B financing, which we were able to reprice a couple weeks ago, reducing the coupon rate by 1%, thereby reducing our cash interest expense by about $7.5 million per year. and shortening the next potential repricing period from one year to six months. The transaction meaningfully reduced our overall cost of financing and will benefit our net distributable earnings going forward. Looking ahead, we believe that leveraging our strong performance and track record as a public company will provide additional opportunities to further optimize our capital structure and reduce our cost of capital. Second, capital deployment. The excess liquidity we held as a defensive measure during the COVID-induced market disruption has adversely impacted Memphis' remittable earnings. With more than $300 million in cash and available liquidity at quarter end coupled with the proceeds from the IPO, we have ample liquidity to close in our robust pipeline and to continue to grow our portfolio. Lastly, continued progress resolving non-accrual loans as well as improved operating performance of our REO portfolio of New York City limited service hotels provide us with strong potential for increases to future earnings. Thank you for giving us an opportunity to provide you with a summary of our third quarter results. Our team is looking forward to updating you on our progress in the coming quarters, in addition to delivering attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders. I would now like to open the call up for Q&A.
Thank you. We will now proceed with the Q&A. If you'd like to ask a question, you can press star 1 on your telephone keypads. If you would like to withdraw your question, you can press star 2. Please ensure you're unmuted locally when asking your question. Our first question for today comes from Rick Shane from JP Morgan. Rick, your line is now open.
Terrific. Thank you guys for doing this. We'd love to hear a little bit about sort of trends into the fourth quarter. You provided an update, $392 million of loans or investments originated in four loans so far. I'm curious, do you expect that sort of normal year-end rush? And can we see a significant acceleration versus that $400 million? Or, you know, help us understand the run right there.
Sure, Rick. It's Kevin. Call it in. I'll take that. So as you noted, we've closed on four investments in the quarter, totaling just under $400 million. But we are very much experiencing that year-end rush that I think most of the folks across the street are experiencing right now. And we expect that run rate to pick up pretty meaningfully. I would say we have a conservative view that will close over an additional billion dollars between now and the end of the year. And it could be greater than that. But some of the things that we are working on could slip into the early first quarter. But certainly a meaningful pickup versus what you've seen so far in the fourth quarter.
Kevin, you broke up. Did you say? Richard, sorry. Kevin, just to clarify, did you say an additional $1 billion by year end?
I think in excess of that, uh, conservatively, we expect it to be in excess of a billion dollars between now and the end of the year. Um, and there, it could be greater than that, but there are a number of things that we're working on that could slip into the beginning of the first quarter, but by all accounts, a meaningful pickup over what we've closed so far in the fourth quarter.
Okay. Thanks. Sorry, Richard. I just wanted to make sure I understood that totally.
Yeah, no, it's a big number. So, um, Rick, what I would point out is that the securitization market is a bit backed up, and this is providing an opportunity for us here at year-end not only to get a lot of originations done, but also to do things at pricing that might not necessarily be available. So it's a pretty interesting time for us right now. We're trying to lean into it. Great.
Excellent. Very helpful, guys. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Rick. Our next question for today comes from Jade Rahami from KBW. Jade, your line is now open.
Thank you very much. You know, we've all seen quite a lot of mortgage REIT IPOs and tends to happen as they trade somewhat poorly initially. And so I'm curious, since this is somewhat of a different construct than prior IPOs, you know, particularly the alignment of interest that the management team has with the shareholders. And I do also want to clarify and comment to confirm that management participated in the offering. But my question is, what are the plans to get the stock price higher to create shareholder value? In my mind, that could include a potential stock buyback, some clarity around the alignment of interest, potentially dividend increases ahead of forecast, and also value that is there to be unlocked from the non-accrual loans. Can you give any comment as to those questions?
Richard, you go ahead. You start first. Yeah, so in terms of how we get the stock price back up, I think it really is all about execution on a number of catalysts that will help drive net distributable earnings and then in turn drive dividend increases. And those are really as follows. Repricing of our term loan B, which we completed a repricing of that a couple weeks ago, effective early December. That'll save us about 1% in coupon on that, which translates to about 5 cents per share per year on MDE and GAAP earnings. In addition to that, deployment of the excess liquidity that we've been holding. We've seen, as Kevin mentioned, the pipeline is very strong and getting that capital deployed should add additional NDE and ability to pay dividends. The other critical pieces here are The improvement in our REO asset, the hotel portfolio, which we've seen very good trends on through the third quarter and into the fourth quarter, so we're optimistic about that. That has been a drag on GAAP and GAAP earnings and NDE over the course of the year, but it's turning a corner. And then with respect to the non-accrual loans, getting those resolved, getting that capital back to earning again is another key component for us. I think it's also worthwhile to highlight there are significant unrecognized contractual coupon interest on those loans as well as default interest on those loans, which in the event those ultimately get realized would be a significant boost to gap earnings and NDE in the coming quarters and years. So those are really the key things that we view we have to execute on to drive NDE and drive dividends on a go-forward basis. So, Jay, let me jump in.
Go ahead.
Yeah, I just want to answer a few more of your questions. I want to start by emphasizing what Mike said. This is about execution and demonstrating that we can continue to improve our dividend performance, and we're going to do that. I think we are making a lot of progress on the REO asset as well as the non-accruals, and we hope to have more concrete news that we can share on that, but we are working very hard and have every expectation things are going to continue to get better there. As it relates to alignment and investment, we have about $30 million in equity invested originally in this business, not counting the substantial amount of dollars that we expended to carry the infrastructure and create the business. So we have $30 million in cash invested in loans, and we put approximately another $30 million in at the IPO. So I think a big show of faith in the business and more alignment of interest. And we believe in this business 100%, and we think the market over time is going to see it the way we do, but it's going to be all about execution.
Thank you very much, and I appreciate the clarity on the alignment of interest. Did see the management's 30 million participation in the IPO. Wanted to ask secondarily around strategy. You emphasized to a great extent the ownership mindset, as well as the Mac company's historical track record in development. So my question is, why not go a step further, especially if you believe we're at perhaps an earlier point in the economic cycle with the economy fully coming out of lockdown and post-COVID? trends emerging, why not do some kind of hybrid equity strategy to participate on the upside on the assets that you say you're lending on and, in fact, you only lend on assets you would want to own? Is that something that you might contemplate in such transactions?
Jay, look, we're open to everything. I think the first thing to do is to execute on the core business plan and make sure that people have great confidence in that. We have confidence in this. We've been executing on it for several years now, but we want to execute as a public company. I think there could be a natural opportunity over time to look at the triple net lease space. It is a place where equity ownership and credit seem to intersect. And it might, you know, we've seen other mortgage REITs execute strongly in that space, and that might make sense for us over time. But we are, you know, we are going to be very cautious about moving into any new businesses and really make sure that people understand the base business and that any type of move like that will be well received by the market. But as to your point, we do have significant expertise on the equity side, and we also have significant expertise and ownership in the past in the triple net lease space. So that's something we are thinking about.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Jade. Our next question comes from Steve Delaney from JMP Securities. Steve, your line is now open.
Thanks. Well, good morning, everyone, and happy holidays. Just one thought, you know, the year's done, we're getting ready to turn the calendar. As you look out to 2022 and You know, you're going to deploy this additional $100 million in your cash pretty quickly. Can you just share your thoughts about alternative capital sources, such as preferred stock and unsecured senior notes, and how you see those getting into the capital structure to support additional growth next year? Thank you. Sure, Steve. And thanks for the question. I think there's a few things that we're thinking about. Obviously, we completed the repricing of our term loan B. We think that shortening that soft call period will help us achieve another repricing and perhaps even diversify that financing going forward a little bit more, which we do should be accretive to earnings. I think as a public company, obviously there's a few other sources of capital that could be available to us that we'll continue to evaluate. And I think the other key thing is we have been accumulating a lot of capital that we think could be attractive for CLO execution. And so we would look to execute a CLO at some point in 2022. And that would help sort of clear out some of our repo lines and further bolster our ability to effectively deploy capital. Yeah, that's a good point because your loans tend to be a little chunkier. Do you think you have assets on the books now that property types, LTV or such, that maybe you could pool together, cut a loan in half and break it down into a 50% participation so that it would fit better into a CLO? Could that be part of that strategy, obviously, rather than dropping all the way down into the middle markets? uh exactly that is that is one of the strategies we're evaluating right now so okay great thank you for the comments and have a great end to the year and holidays thanks thank you steve our next question comes from dom from bessie from wells fargo dom your line is now open great uh mike As you look to Q4, do you expect any new non-performing loans? At this point, no. As Priyanka likes to say, every loan in our portfolio is a watch list loan because we're a transitional lender. So we're continuing to very closely monitor the portfolio. I would say at this point, no, but it's something that we're monitoring vigilantly across the portfolio, and hopefully we can have some, as Richard mentioned, we can get some resolutions on some of the existing non-accruals in the near term. But Priyanka, I don't know if you want to comment any further on that.
No, I agree with that. It's very fluid. We're constantly evaluating it. we look at every loan based on the underlying collateral, sub-market, broader asset class, borrower sponsorship, consideration. So it's very fluid, but I agree with Mike as we sit here today.
Okay. And Mike, can you put a number out there in terms of the REO, the hotels, what occupancy is or rep are, and just give us some perspective on where you are today versus, you know, one, two, three quarters ago, and just so that we can Keep an eye on it and track that progress. Sure. I'm going to hand that one over to Priyanka. She has been running with that.
Thanks, Don. We've been very pleased with performance thus far. Redpire has certainly been moving in the right direction. The summer was a good pickup once the economy started opening. The fall was relatively strong, particularly on the weekends. But where we are now is that performance is not very consistent throughout the week. We're seeing dips on midweek demand. But the difference here in December, as we sit here today, is we're having very strong weekdays. So, you know, peak rev par pre-COVID was around $200. And we're seeing some nights that are touching that, frankly, exceeding that on our strongest nights. But there's no consistency around that. So it's something we're monitoring very closely. But I You know, we feel like the market will recover over time and have consistent performance, and that will ultimately yield a monetization opportunity for our investors.
Got it. And, you know, can you just give us a sense on the occupancy? I mean, you have seven hotels. You know, is it 20%, 50%, 70%?
Yeah, you know, the averages are tough. I mean, on a monthly basis, they're kind of 60% to 70%. And, again, just very high on the weekends versus the weekdays. So really cloudy and inconsistent. And I think, as is always the case in New York City, you know, as we are on the precipice here of the first quarter, it's just we're going to be dealing with some seasonality issues as well.
Got it. And I guess my last question, Richard, if you could just comment. You have a lot of New York exposure. the COVID cases are up. Like, what is your thought process on your overweight position in New York? Look, we believe in New York long term. And, you know, we have the loans that we have to some of the best sponsors in the city means that they are either performing well or protecting. And they believe in New York So it's a question of getting through a little bit of a rough patch. We have no retail exposure here, and we have not much office exposure. But we are worried about building a diverse book of business, and I think we're going to continue to diversify out of New York as loans pay off. And I think you're going to see that – progress continue but we we need a meaningful presence in new york um as a large loan transitional lender um and we are we believe in the long-term prospects of new york we have you know real um kind of strong views on kind of what sectors to be in and not be in in new york over a long period of time one thing we've never done here is um luxury i would call super luxury condo And I don't think that view, I think that was the right view, and I don't think anything is going to change. And we've focused significantly on residential exposure and what I would call more affordable luxury and smaller size condominiums to the extent that we were outside of the rental market. And that strategy has proved very, very strong. And I think we'll continue to be looking at those type of positions going forward, but this is about diversification and acknowledging that there are places in New York that are going to be very strong and places in New York that are going to be challenged. And as we look to continue investing in the biggest real estate market in the U.S., having conviction around the places that are going to continue to perform and perform better and the places that we really shouldn't be investing.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, Dom. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, that's star 1 on your telephone keypad. Our next question comes from Brock van der Vliet from UBS. Brock, your line is now open.
Thank you. Good morning. I'll admit I'm coming at this more as a bank analyst than a REIT or BDC analyst. In bank land, often the attitude with distress is your first loss is your best loss, or at least it's been that way up until COVID. I guess, first on the REO asset, it sounds like it makes sense. You're hitting a good rev par numbers here in a seasonally strong period, but Q1 tends to be weaker, you know, for New York hotels. What's the, you know, can you comment more about what the end game is? And, you know, I'm kind of curious what you're playing for and why not just, you know, why not just move on?
Hi, Brock. It's Priyanka. I'll start, and others can chime in if they want. We feel really good about our basis is the short answer. We foreclosed on this portfolio in February of 2021, obviously a very challenging time for hospitality. And at that time when we foreclosed, our basis was in line with appraisals at that time, which obviously values had been hit quite hard. So we have the liquidity to continue to carry these assets, and we feel that once there's real stabilization, real forward bookings, there's some view into stability of RevPAR forward-looking, that'll be the right time to go to market and monetize and make a meaningful increase in profits for our investors. And it's an attractive asset class to the extent that you're going to be in hospitality in New York City, the limited service nature and the scale that's provided by the seven hotels together we think will make it an attractive investment.
Got it. Okay. Let me add one thing to that. Sorry, it's Rick. Our goal is not to own assets. But, you know, I do... think there is historical precedence. I've been a distressed buyer, and that's not our plan, in the real estate business since the early 90s. And over and over again, the returns that have been made buying from the banks who have taken that first loss have been in excess of other places in the real estate market. And so we don't want to hold REO, but we want to make sure that we're not selling at the bottom because we have the capacity and the expertise to hold REO if we need to. But our goal is to have as little REO as possible and do everything that we can to work with our borrowers to make sure that that doesn't happen. But I don't think we can run away from kind of the historical nature of of real estate being a business that is incredibly cyclical.
Okay. And separately on the non-accrual, can you just talk about how much of that non-accrual amount is raw land and what sort of the game plan is there? Are those being marketed to an outside party or is the game plan to you know, ultimately extend construction financing there to the current owner? What's the plan there?
It's Priyanka. I'll start there. So one of those loans that's on non-accrual is raw. It's not raw land. There are improvements on the properties, but we made the loan on, you know, we consider it a land loan. We feel the collateral value of the land alone is is how we underwrote our exposure. On that non-accrual in particular, we are pursuing all rights and remedies available to us. In that instance, that includes we've recently filed foreclosure papers on that loan. We, as you know, it's a judicial foreclosure. That will take plenty of time to work through the system, but we have other opportunities that are available to us, some of which you just mentioned. And so the outcome is still to be determined, but we feel very good, and I always come back to the fact that we're very well collateralized against the real estate there.
Got it. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you, Brock. That concludes the Q&A for today. I will hand back to Mike McGillis for any closing remarks.
Thank you, everybody, for joining us for today's earnings call. We really appreciate your time and your support. Should you have any further questions, feel free to reach out to Ann or myself. Thank you so much, and hope everybody has a wonderful holiday season and Happy New Year as we head into 2022. Take care, all.
Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect.