This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Greetings and welcome to the CVR Energy, Inc. second quarter 2022 conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Richard Roberts, Vice President of FP&A and IR for CVR Energy, Inc. Thank you. You may begin.
spk01: Thank you, Melissa. Good afternoon, everyone. We very much appreciate you joining us this afternoon for our CBR Energy Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. With me today are Dave Lant, our Chief Executive Officer, Dane Newman, our Chief Financial Officer, and other members of management. Prior to discussing our 2022 Second Quarter results, let me remind you that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements, as that term is defined under federal securities laws. For this purpose, any statements made during this call that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. You are cautioned that these statements may be affected by important factors set forth in our filings, Securities and Exchange Commission, and in our latest earnings release. As a result, actual operations or results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except to the extent required by law. Let me also remind you that the CVR Partners completed a 1 for 10 reverse split of its common units on November 23, 2020. Any per-unit references made on this call are on a split-adjusted basis. This call also includes various non-GAAP financial measures. The disclosures related to such non-GAAP measures, including reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, are included in our 2022 second quarter earnings release that we filed with the SEC and Form 10-Q for the period and will be discussed during the call. With that said, I'll turn the call over to Dave. Thank you, Richard.
spk09: Good afternoon. Thank you for joining our earnings call. Yesterday, we reported our second quarter consolidated net income of $239 million and earnings per share of $1.64. EBITDA for the quarter was $401 million. Fundamentals in refining and fertilizer sector continued to improve during the second quarter, and once again, we posted improved results in both segments on a year-over-year basis, though this was offset by a legal accrual in our corporate segment. We are pleased to announce, in addition to the second quarter regular dividend of $0.40 per share, the Board has also authorized a special dividend of $2.60 per share, both of which will be paid on August 22 to shareholders of record at the close of the market on August 12. At yesterday's closing price, the combined annual dividend of $1.60 per share and the special dividend of $2.60 per share represents a dividend yield of nearly 13%, which is currently almost four times the average dividend yield among independent refiners. For our petroleum segment, the combined total throughput for the second quarter of 2022 was approximately 201,000 barrels per day, with Winningwood completing its planned turnaround on time and on budget in early April. This compares to 217,000 barrels per day in the second quarter of 2021. With the hydrocracker conversion at Winneywood to renewable diesel service, we expect crude throughput at Winneywood to be reduced by approximately 5,000 barrels per day going forward. Benchmark cracks increased throughout the quarter. The Group 211 crack spread averaged $48.50 per barrel in the second quarter as compared to $19.15 in the second quarter of 2021. Based on 2021 and 2022 RVO levels that were finalized in June, RIN prices averaged approximately $7.58 per barrel in the second quarter, a decrease of 7% from the second quarter of 2021. The Brent TI differential averaged $3.38 per barrel in the second quarter compared to $2.91 per barrel in the prior year period. Light product yield for the quarter was 98% on crude oil processed. Our distillate yield as percentage of total crude oil throughput was 43%. Despite the conversion of the hydrocracker at Winnie Wood to renewable diesel service, we have lightened our crude slate at Winnie Wood, and we have not seen a material decline in our distillate yield. We continue to operate our refineries in max distillate mode. In total, we gathered approximately 126,000 barrels of crude oil during the second quarter of 2022, compared to 118,000 barrels per day for the same period last year. Our crude oil gathering rates have increased on both a quarter-over-quarter and a year-over-year basis, and we are encouraged to see producers start to ramp up activity in the Anarcho Basin. The Renewable Diesel Unit at Winneywood began operations in mid-April, and is processing and processed approximately 3,100 barrels per day of vegetable oil feedstocks during the quarter. We have been gradually increasing the rate over the past few months. The hobo spread averaged a negative $1.95 per gallon for the second quarter, but increased to a negative $1.33 per gallon in June. With the increases in diesel prices and the improvement in the hobo spread recently, we're seeing positive economics from the renewable diesel unit. In the fertilizer segment, we faced some unplanned downtime at both plants during the quarter, with consolidated ammonia utilization coming in at approximately 89%. Sales volume for the second quarters of 22 were impacted by a late start to the spring planting, along with some demand destruction as a result of higher fertilizer price environment. Lower sales volumes were more than offset, however, by increased price realizations. which drove strong results for the quarter. Global supply of nitrogen fertilizer remains tight, and with continued upward pressure on energy prices in Europe, we believe high fertilizer price environment could continue into 2023. Now let me turn the call over to Dane to discuss additional financial highlights.
spk02: Thank you, Dane, and good afternoon, everyone. For the second quarter of 2022, Our consolidated net income was $239 million, earnings per share was $1.64, and EBITDA was $401 million. Our second quarter results include a legal accrual of $79 million, a negative mark-to-market impact on our estimated outstanding rent obligation of $51 million, unrealized derivative losses of $21 million, and favorable inventory valuation impacts of $41 million. Our estimated outstanding rent obligation is based on the 2020, 2021, and 2022 RVOs that were recently finalized in June and excludes the impacts of any waivers or exemptions. Excluding the above-mentioned items, adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $511 million, and adjusted earnings per share was $2.45. The petroleum segment's adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2022 was $383 million, compared to $18 million for the second quarter of 2021. The year-over-year increase in adjusted EBITDA was driven primarily by increased product cracks and lower average RINs prices offset somewhat by lower throughput volume and realized derivative losses. In the second quarter of 2022, our petroleum segment's reported refining margin was $26.10 per barrel. Excluding the mark-to-market impact of our estimated outstanding RIN obligation of $2.79 per barrel, favorable inventory impacts of $2.02 per barrel, and unrealized derivative losses of $1.20 per barrel, our refining margin would have been approximately $28.06 per barrel. On this basis, capture rate for the second quarter of 2022 was 58%, compared to 31% in the second quarter of 2021. RIN's expense, excluding mark-to-market impacts, reduced our second quarter capture rate by approximately 11%, compared to a 31% reduction in the prior period. RIN's expense for the second quarter of 2022 was $153 million, or $8.34 per barrel of total throughput compared to an expense of $173 million or $8.77 per barrel for the same period last year. As a reminder, our reported RINs expense does not include the impact of any waivers or exemptions. Our second quarter RINs expense includes a $51 million mark-to-market impact on our estimated accrued RFS obligation, which includes a $55 million benefit from the lower RBOs that were finalized in June. The estimated accrued RFS obligation on the balance sheet was marked to market at an average RIN price of $1.61 a quarter end compared to $1.37 at the end of March. For the full year 2022, we forecast an obligation of approximately 150 million RINs, which includes approximately 85 million RINs expected from renewable diesel production, but does not include the impact of any waivers or exemptions. Derivative losses in the petroleum segment totaled 61 million for the second quarter of 2022, which includes unrealized losses of 22 million, primarily associated with crack spread derivatives. In the second quarter of 2021, we had total derivative losses of 2 million, which included unrealized losses of 37 million, primarily associated with the crack spread hedges that were closed at the end of the third quarter of 2021. The petroleum segment's direct operating expenses were $6.12 per barrel in the second quarter of 2022, as compared to $4.23 per barrel in the prior year period. The increases in direct operating expenses were primarily due to higher personnel costs, in part due to share-based compensation due to the increased stock price, as well as increased natural gas prices and repair and maintenance costs. For the second quarter of 2022, the fertilizer segment reported operating income of $126 million, net income of $118 million, or $11.12 per common unit, and EBITDA of $147 million. This is compared to second quarter of 2021 operating income of $30 million, net income of $7 million, or $0.66 per common unit, and EBITDA of $51 million. There were no adjustments to EBITDA in either period. The year-over-year increase in EBITDA was primarily driven by higher UAN and ammonia sales prices, offset somewhat by lower sales volumes. The partnership declared a distribution of $10.05 per common unit for the second quarter of 2022. As CBR Energy owns approximately 37% of CBR Partners' common units, we will receive a proportionate cash distribution of approximately $39 million. Total consolidated capital spending for the second quarter of 2022 was $41 million, which included $19 million from the petroleum segment, $9 million from the fertilizer segment, and $12 million on the renewable diesel unit. Environmental and maintenance capital spending comprised $28 million, included $19 million in the petroleum segment, and $8 million in the fertilizer segment. We estimate total consolidated capital spending for 2022 to be approximately $195 to $224 million, of which approximately $134 to $148 million is expected to be environmental and maintenance capital. Our consolidated capital spending plan excludes planned turnaround spending, which we estimate will be approximately $80 to $85 million for the year for the recently completed planned turnaround at Winniewood and in preparation for the planned turnaround at Coffeyville in 2023. Cash provided by operations for the second quarter of 2022 was $390 million, and free cash flow was $275 million. Significant cash uses in the quarter included $115 million for CapEx and turnaround spending, $59 million for income tax, $40 million of dividends, $19 million of interest, and $15 million for the non-controlling interest portion of the CVR partner's first quarter distribution. Turning to the balance sheet at June 30th, we ended the quarter with approximately $893 million of cash. Our consolidated cash balance includes $156 million in the fertilizer segment. As of June 30th, excluding CBR partners, we had approximately $983 million of liquidity, which was primarily comprised of approximately $737 million of cash and availability under the ABL of approximately $246 million. In June, we completed an amendment of the ABL agreement, right-sizing the facility to $275 million extending the maturity five years, removing cash from the borrowing base, and potentially adding renewables inventory. Looking ahead to the third quarter of 2022, for our petroleum segment, we estimate total throughput to be approximately 190 to 205,000 barrels per day. We expect total direct operating expenses to range between 90 and 100 million and total capital spending to be between 30 and 35 million. For the fertilizer segment, we estimate our third quarter 2022 ammonia utilization rate to be between 60 and 65% as a result of the two planned turnarounds of the summer. We expect direct operating expenses to be approximately 60 to 65 million, excluding inventory and turnaround impacts, and total capital spending to be between 22 and 27 million. Turnaround spending is expected to be 30 to 35 million of expense. For renewables, we estimate third quarter 2022 total throughput to be approximately 4,500, to 6,000 barrels per day, and direct operating expenses to be between $2 and $4 million. With that, Dave, I will turn it back over to you. Thank you, Dane.
spk09: In summary, we are proud of our strong results for the second quarter of 2022 and pleased to be returning $3 per share in dividends to our shareholders. Tight supply and demand fundamentals in both refining and fertilizer businesses contributed to the strength in our consolidated results, and we believe the outlook for the near term continues to be favorable for both businesses. Starting with refining, domestic and global inventories of crude and refined products remain below five-year average levels, driven by a combination of demand returning to pre-COVID levels and global refining capacity being reduced by approximately 5 million barrels per day. We're starting to see some demand destruction as a result of increased prices, particularly for gasoline, with U.S. vehicle miles traveled turned negative in April and May compared to the same periods in 19. More specifically to the mid-con, we have seen some tapering in gasoline and distillate demand, but both are still comfortably within the five-year average levels. Looking at crude oil, inventories are still on the low side and have been distorted to some degree by the sales from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The SBIR sales have also distorted inland crude differentials, and we have seen a widening of WCS differentials despite little or no production growth in that area. With crude oil prices comfortably in the $100 per barrel range, we are starting to see more activity in our backyard as evidenced by our increased crude oil gathering rates in the second quarter. We believe at these crude oil prices, we could see further acceleration in drilling activity, although EMP companies continue to grapple with investor calls for capital discipline, along with limited availability of manpower, well services, steel, and contending with general cost inflation. Underinvestment in upstream activities over the past seven years is evident worldwide, and is part of the reasons we are seeing the prices where they are today. The main concern, however, continues to be the potential and the severity of a global recession that could impact demand. Turning to refined products, crude spreads in the second quarter reached levels that are typically only seen during a hurricane or some other major disruption, and even then, only for a short period of time. It is possible that cracks peaked in the second quarter. As I've said many times, the best cure for high prices is high prices, and we are seeing the effects of high prices on demand in the market today. Utilization across the U.S. refining fleet has been very high at 95%, and there is still quite a bit of maintenance scheduled for the second half of the year. Despite the decline in the peaks of the second quarter, crack spreads are still incredibly strong today, particularly for diesel, where cracks are significantly better than gasoline. The forward curve for the Group 3 distillate crack is nearly $43 per barrel for calendar year 23 and over $37 per barrel for calendar year 24. Although it has not been discussed much recently, we believe IMO 2020 is having a meaningful impact on the price of diesel, with nearly a million barrels of diesel headed to bunker fuel markets in order to meet sulfur specs. We also see a material impact on the price of gasoline from the renewable fuel standard, which is adding approximately 30 cents per gallon to the retail prices and is incentivizing refiners to export as much fuel as possible. If the government were serious about doing everything in its power to bring down the price of gasoline, fixing RFS and bringing down our RIN prices would be a very quick and easy solution. In the fertilizer segment, we had strong second quarter results despite cold and wet weather across the Mid-Continent significantly delayed the planting season. We also believe there's some demand destruction as a result of the high fertilizer pricing environment. Once again, high prices are the best cure for high prices. Looking ahead, we believe the world remains tight on nitrogen fertilizer supply. And with a persistent high natural gas price in Europe, the floor for natural gas pricing is significantly higher than it's been in the past few years. The summer fill program for ammonia and UAM were both recently completed at favorable pricing, and we expect prices to continue to increase in the fall. We have turnarounds scheduled at both fertilizer plants in the third quarter, with Coffeyville nearly complete and East Dubuque starting in a couple of weeks. Following the completion of these turnarounds, we do not have any planned activity for the fertilizer segment until 24 at the earliest. Finally, in the renewable diesel business, we are seeing improved fundamentals with the hobo spread averaging less than a dollar per gallon, a negative in the past month. Offsetting this somewhat is continued weakness in the low carbon fuel standard credits in California, which have fallen to around $90 to $95 per tonne. When taking into account the expected credit values from our blended soybean oil and corn oil, we see an advantage to sending the product out to California at these levels. Total throughput volumes in July were approximately 3,600 barrels per day, and we continue to ramp up to full production. In October, we're planning our first catalyst change, which will take the renewable diesel down for about 20 days. We're also continuing to work on the pretreatment unit which is expected to be complete and online in the second half of 23. With the addition of the PTU unit, we believe we could see margin improvement in the renewable diesel of approximately $1 per gallon. As we discussed over the past few quarters, we continue to make progress on reorganization of the company to segregate the renewables business. We have created 17 new entities internally, and in early July completed distribution of certain refining materials real estate assets into the appropriate entities. We anticipate completing the reorganization in the first half of 23 and intend to begin reporting separate renewable segments when appropriate. Looking at the third quarter of 22, quarter-to-date metrics are as follows. Group 2-on-1 cracks have averaged $45.58 per barrel. with a Brent TI of $5.32 per barrel and a Midland differential of $1.67 over WTI. The WTL differential is averaged $0.49 over WTI, and the WCS differential is averaged $19.70 per barrel under WTI. Fertilizer prices remain strong as well, with ammonia prices over $950 per ton and UAM prices over $400. $450 per ton. As of yesterday, Group 3 2-1-1 cracks were $33.85 per barrel. Bread TI was $7.64 per barrel, and WCS was at $20.75 under WTI. Rins were approximately $7.90 per barrel. Ammonia prices were about a $1,000 per ton and UAN prices are about $450 per ton. In June, the EPA finally announced the 21 and 22 RVOs along with an adjustment to the 2020 RVO. At the same time, it denied all small refinery waiver requests. These announcements only caused RIN prices to move higher as the blending mandates were once again set at levels that are unachievable, particularly for small and merchant refiners. As we have continuously stated, we believe Winnie Wood's obligation should be exempt under RFS as intended by Congress. We have challenged EPA's unlawful denial of our small refinery exemptions for 2018 through 2021 and will vigorously pursue this in court. We continue to fight for the rights we believe Winnie Wood is entitled to and will continue to carry an obligation on our balance sheet related to Winnie Wood's outstanding rent obligation. Although the misguided actions by EPA are troublesome and ultimately hurting the American consumer at the pump, we are pleased with our strong results for the second quarter and are optimistic about the near-term outlook. We will continue to focus on safe, reliable operations of our assets in an environmentally responsible manner to ensure we are ready to capture any market opportunities that may develop. With that, operator, we're ready for questions.
spk00: Thank you. At this point, we'll be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question comes from the line of Carly Davenport with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.
spk03: Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to just start on the capital return side. As you think about the current macro, can you talk about your priorities from a capital allocation perspective? Is there preference to continue to look at incremental special dividends from here, or is there potential for further growth in the regular dividend or around buybacks?
spk09: Sure, Carly. As we've said many times, you know, we're a company that returns cash to shareholders as soon as we have no better use for it. And I don't think we'll see any change in that strategy as evidenced by our special this time. And, you know, I don't know that the board will continue to select special dividend as the mechanism or increase the regular. but it'll be revisited every quarter and decisions will be made around that as we go forward. But bottom line is our commitment is to return cash to shareholders.
spk03: Great. Appreciate that color. And then the follow-up was just around Winnie Wood Renewable Diesel. Can you just give us some color in terms of how the asset has been performing from an operational perspective, what you've learned from starting that up? And then perhaps how the potential extension of the Blender's tax credit could impact your future views on incremental renewable fuels plans going forward?
spk09: Sure. Well, we've really had no problems making this conversion to a renewable diesel from an operating standpoint. Logistics have been more of a challenge for us. Just getting the railroad in tune with our needs to deliver soybean oil and corn oil on a timely basis as well as remove product on a timely basis has been some of our bigger challenges. But we continue to work through those and they're all coming to be. I think some of the things that have developed in the business ourselves is we have began to look at sourcing some pre-treated feed that looks very attractive to us. Not only that will happen before our pre-treaters online or potentially before our pre-treaters But even with the pre-treater, you know, sourcing feedstock doesn't appear to be any concern. We can easily do it. And, you know, really our challenge going forward is really around sourcing more of the lower CI materials. And we continue to work that strategy as we go. But overall, it's been a pretty straightforward, easy convergence.
spk08: Great, thank you.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Manav Gupta with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question.
spk05: Hey guys, congrats on a very good quarter. I just wanted to follow up a little bit on the PTU side. I might be wrong, but I think we were modeling it a little sooner, I think somewhere around second quarter. So I would like to understand Why is it moving or if it's moving back a little? And also, when we think about this as a reportable segment, should we basically assume that you will report it once the PTU starts? Then it kind of can become its own reportable segment if you could just talk about those two things.
spk09: Sure. I think, you know, we've mentioned our strategy going forward is to maintain our refining assets. going forward, but very little investment except for sustaining capital turnarounds and keeping them in good working order. The reason for breaking out renewables as a business is, you know, that's where our future dollars are going should the markets develop. So our plan is to report as a separate segment when appropriate. I don't know that it will be triggered off of the PTU or not. It's more around the restructuring and getting our systems built or financial systems built to be able to accomplish that. And that would at best would be probably the second quarter of next year, maybe later. As far as the PTU moving back a bit, yeah, I think it's just the engineering, just some of the supply problems have caught us a bit and moved us back a quarter on that. We originally thought we'd be in it in the second quarter. I think it's more likely that it'll be in the second half sometime, maybe next. you know, and towards the end of the second quarter, the third quarter, somewhere in that timeframe that we actually have it up and running.
spk05: Perfect. And a quick follow-up here is if you could help us understand your outlook on the Brent WTI spread. Is it only a function of SPR releases and other things, or is it also a function of actual inland volume starting to grow? If you could just give us a medium to near-term outlook on the Brent WTI side. Thank you so much.
spk09: Sure. Well, I've always said that Brent TI is very dependent on shale oil production. And Permian's growing nicely. The rest of them are kind of anemic. We are starting to see a little bit in the Anarco Basin, but if you look at the Bakken, it's pretty flat. The Eagleford's fairly flat. Nibrara's fairly flat. DJ's fairly flat. So, you know, I think we're in the early throes of that starting to happen. But, you know, until rig count continues to grow, I think the strategic petroleum reserve releases are probably influencing the Brent TI as much as anything, but we're optimistic that as shell oil grows and there's still plenty of takeaway capacity that the Brent TI will widen to force barrels offshore because, once again, the ability of the U.S. fleet to run light Midland-type crudes is very limited. and basically full.
spk05: Thank you so much for taking my question.
spk08: You're welcome.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Royal with JP Morgan. Please proceed with your question.
spk04: Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. So could you give a little more color on the near-term fundamentals in the fertilizer business? I know it was a difficult planting season this year, and there's also been this decision by the ITC to waive certain tariffs. So just looking for an update on how you think about the back half shaping up. And I know you'll be impacted by turnarounds there, but just more on the fundamental picture over the near term.
spk09: Well, I think the prices are still very, very strong, even at levels they're at today. I don't think there's anything that I can see that's going to change that. The tariff situation was a disappointment, but frankly, it's not the driver of the market right now. It's all natural gas in Europe and pricing there. A good number of the plants there are shut down because of high natural gas prices. They're actually importing ammonia to run their upgraders, and that's really about all they're doing. And I don't see that situation changing. In fact, we just had another big uptick in natural gas prices, approaching $60 a million BTUs. That puts ammonia at $1,800. almost $2,000 a ton. So those fundamentals are very, very strong and probably are not going to change in the short term unless there's a resolution to the Ukraine war and Russia stops its activities with maintenance and other things designed to starve Europe from natural gas. So we're very bullish on fertilizer prices and demands.
spk04: Great. This is really helpful. Thank you. And then just switching over to the RD side, you spoke a little bit on the fundamentals there, but is there any update you can provide on how you're thinking about the potential conversion of the hydro-treater at Coffeyville? I think last quarter you were sort of characterizing it as somewhat of a wait and see. There has been some kind of news flow since then. You know, we have the National Oil CFS Program in Canada starting next year, you know, potential for renewal of the BTC. So just any update on kind of how you're thinking about that project?
spk09: Yeah, you know, I think we're still, you know, this is probably a $650 million project, so It's a big one for us, and we really need to see some other states opt into renewables in a low carbon fuel standard, or frankly, a pivot of the RFS, which with the reset coming up, that could happen, and RFS pivot towards a low carbon fuel standard, and those would move it. As far as the BTC goes, all we get is extensions, two years, two years, one year. You know, that's hard to plan a business around when you have that level of uncertainty. All that said, you know, I think our desire is we have a project that's scoped and ready, and we'll be able to pull the trigger when we feel that timing's right. Don't think it's there yet.
spk04: Thanks very much. Really helpful.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Blair with Tudor Pickering Holt. Please proceed with your question.
spk07: Hey, good morning, Dave. Hey, Matt. The reporting showed, I believe, 6,000 barrels of WCS runs in the second quarter at your refinery. But are you still piping down extra WCS barrels and reselling them at Cushing and getting the economics there? And if so, could you remind us on the volume?
spk09: Sure. We have pipeline space on paper of 35,000 barrels per day. We're usually restricted or have been in the past to about 30,000 of delivery. So when that ARB's open, we'll not only meet our own needs, and we're limited to about 11,000, 12,000 barrels a day at our Coffeyville refinery on runs, but we'll sell the rest in cushy. And frankly, we're looking at other alternatives to sell it on the Gulf Coast also. But generally, we sell in Cushing today. And that is typically whatever's left from what we don't run at our Coffeyville Refinery. And that market's pretty liquid, and we pretty much are always in the money on it. Our cost to deliver from Canada is about $6, a little over $6. And typically, we're making money on those sales.
spk08: Great. Thank you. I'll leave it there.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Paul Chang with Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question.
spk06: Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Maybe that I missed it. Dane, can you just remind us that how much is on the balance sheet for the RVO obligation that you need to settle for this year and next year?
spk02: Yeah, Paul, the total obligation on our balance sheet as of the end of the quarter was $708 million, and that's for all 2020, 2021, and 2022 open positions. And so those is all?
spk06: for next year, right? This year, there's nothing to settle.
spk08: Ask again, Paul.
spk06: No, I'm saying that that entire month, it is 2021 and 2022, so the deadline for the settlement is next year, between the first quarter and the third quarter. So this year, you're not going to have any cash settlement on the balance sheet. related to the financial obligation?
spk08: Yes.
spk06: And then when you say $708 million or $708 million win? That is dollars. Dollars. Okay. Thank you. And just curious that, David, with the diesel crack where we are, is it Is it better for you that to run the RD as going to run the conventional oil? Or that, I mean, why that you will still running for the RD, even though that it may be a positive contribution at this point, but I can imagine it's going to be far more positive contribution if you run the conventional oils. How quickly if you can
spk09: Well, Paul, you know, I think as we've said, you know, we get the choice to make the decision every time we do a catalyst change. And we made the decision to convert to RD. And, you know, I think it's been a good one, even with the cracks where they are. You know, you can argue the opportunity cost was pretty high during that period of time. But the incentive to run RD has not been bad either, with the hobo spread being where it's been.
spk06: We'll look at it.
spk09: We'll look at it again when we do this catalyst change, but I think we'll probably stay on RD because you can't, you know, the practicality is you can jump in and out a little bit, but, you know, it takes rail cars. It takes a lot of setup logistics to get it going. And unless we just see a train wreck, I don't think you'll see us convert back.
spk06: I see. And typically, how long is the change on the catalyst? That'd be 18 months to two years or it's longer?
spk09: No, on RD, it's at full capacity. We're estimating between six months and a year of life. So we got to look every six months, basically.
spk06: And two really quick questions. On the also dividend, is there a formula approach or that is really purely on the discretionary But when you determine, say, 260, I mean, how exactly is the thought process, say, that's the right number?
spk09: Well, Paul, it's somewhat subjective. The board makes that decision every time. You know, we're going to cover maintaining our assets, sustaining capital. We're going to recover our turnaround costs. We're going to cover our interest charges on any debt we have. And then we're going to, you know, we have to buy crude on a monthly basis and we're going to cover those expenses. So that's how the board generally looks at it. And, you know, a rent obligation is also another consideration. But that, you know, it's just an every quarter look at where we sit on cash. And, you know, the volatility of the cracks drives those numbers up and down like math, as you might imagine.
spk06: Right. Okay. A final one, with the rising fear of recession, does it impact your balance sheet management in terms of how much cash balance that you want to keep and what is the cash return? I mean, how that factor is being built into your thought process?
spk09: Well, I mean, the price of crude matters. It's that, you know, a crude settlement day, it grows with the higher prices. So, and then we also have to be careful of the inventory we hold that gets revalued, and that's cash out the door, should that have, should crude drop in half, for instance. So, we consider all those factors, and, you know, typically the Our minimum cash balance is between $250 at low crude prices and $500 at high crude prices.
spk06: Thank you.
spk09: You're welcome.
spk00: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question and answer session. I'll turn the floor back to management for any final comments.
spk09: Again, I'd like to thank you all for your interest in CVR Energy. Additionally, I'd like to thank our employees for their hard work and commitment towards safe, reliable, and environmentally responsible operations. We look forward to reviewing our third quarter 22 results in our next earnings call. Thank you.
spk00: Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Disclaimer