This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Thank you for standing by. My name is Dina. I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the California Water Service Group Q2 2024 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to James Lynch, Senior Vice President, CFO and Treasurer. Please go ahead.
spk07: Thank you, Dee. Welcome everyone to our second quarter 2024 results call for California Water Service Group. With me today is Marty Kropelnicki, our Chairman and CEO, and Greg Milliman, Vice President of Rates and Regulatory Affairs. A replay dial-in information for this call can be found in our quarterly results earnings release, which was issued earlier today. The replay will be available until September 30th, 2024. As a reminder, before we begin, the company has a slide deck to accompany today's earnings call. The slide deck was furnished with an 8K and is also available at the company's website at www.calwatergroup.com. Before looking at second quarter 2024 results, I'd like to take a few moments to cover forward-looking statements. During the course of the call, the company may make certain forward-looking statements. Because these statements deal with future events, they are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from the company's current expectations. As a result, the company strongly advises all current shareholders as well as interest parties to carefully read and understand the company's disclosures on risks and uncertainties found in our forms 10-K, 10-Q, press releases, and other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. I will now turn the call over to Marty to start us off.
spk06: Great. Thank you, Jim. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us here today. It's been a busy quarter, and we have a number of items we want to update you on today. First, I'm going to ask Jim to give you an update on our financial performance for the quarter. And I'll just lead into that by saying what a difference a year makes. Last year, no rate relief. This year, getting the 21 rate case finally concluded and on the books, it's made a big difference. I'll also ask Jim to include some of the highlights of our capital program for 2024 infrastructure improvement plan. We have Greg Millman here today to talk about the filing of the 2024 general rate to 2027. I want to spend a little bit of time talking about the recent California Supreme Court decision that protects water utilities' rights to due process and preserves decoupling. Spend some time talking about emergency response. If you've watched the fires in California, it's been a very busy fire season so far this year, so we want to give you an update on the current fires as well as our community outreach efforts to continually improve our process in which we help first responders fight fires. Give an update on the PFOS and the ongoing remediation activities the company has planned for the next three years. Give you an update on our business development activities and what's going on there. And we conclude talking about ESG and our recent ESG report that was published in May. So before giving you the operational update, I'm going to turn it back over to Jim to give an update on the financial results for the quarter of the year to date. Jim?
spk07: Thanks, Marty. As Marty mentioned, our Q2 2024 financial results benefited from new rates and the rate structure authorized in our 2021 California GRC. In addition, since Q2 2023, our return on equity increased to 10.27% under our water cost of capital mechanism adjustment, and we benefited from water production offsets and other advice letter filings. As a result, our operating revenue for the quarter increased 25.9% to $244.3 million compared to our prior year Q2 operating revenue of $194 million. Reported net income for the quarter was $40.6 million, or $0.70 per diluted share, compared to $9.6 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, in Q2 2023. The quarter-over-quarter growth was driven primarily by a $19.3 million increase in rates billed to customers as authorized in our regulatory filings, an increase in accrued unbilled revenue of $10.4 million due to higher rates and an increase in the number of unbilled days, and the recognition of $8.2 million in accrued MRAM revenues and $7.9 million in accrued IRMA revenues. As a reminder, our 2021 GRC was adopted in Q1 of 2024 and included 2023 interim rate relief, which totaled $64 million. $18.7 million of the interim rate relief was attributable to Q2 of 2023. Q2 2024 operating expenses were $196.1 million compared to Q2 2023 operating expenses of $178.1 million. The $18 million increase was primarily driven by $6.8 million in higher water production costs and $8.4 million in higher income tax expenses related to higher pre-tax earnings. The impact of the Q2 2024 activity on diluted earnings per share is presented in the Q2 2023 to Q2 2024 diluted earnings per share bridge on slide six. The more significant earning drivers were the 2021 GRC rate increases, and increases in accrued revenue, which contributed 23 cents, 26 cents, and 14 cents, respectively, to diluted earnings per share. These drivers were partially offset by increases in water production expenses of 9 cents per diluted share and other factors that netted to a penny per diluted share. Our year-to-date 2024 results benefited from the same regulatory outcomes as our quarterly results. In addition, recall that in Q1, 2024, we recorded benefits related to the California Extended Water Arrearages Payment Program, or EWAP. This enabled us to decrease the deferral period of RAM and MCBA revenue and expenses. Our 2024 year-to-date operating revenue increased 58.4% to $515 million compared to 2023 year-to-date revenue of $325.1 million. Year-to-date 2024 net income was $110.5 million, or $1.90 per diluted share, compared to 2023 year-to-date net loss of $12.7 million, or 23 cents per diluted share. The year-to-date growth was driven primarily by cumulative rate increases from the 2021 general rate case of $131.5 million, $31.6 million in rate increases billed to customers and the recognition of $16 million in previously deferred RAM revenue as a result of securing the EWAP funds for the payment of eligible customer balances. Year-to-date, 2024 operating expenses were $389 million compared to 2023 year-to-date operating expenses of $326.7 million. The $62.3 million increase was primarily driven by increased water production costs of $16 million that included $9.2 million related to the Incremental Cost Balancing Account, or ICVA. The ICVA is a new water cost recovery mechanism authorized in the 2021 GRC. We also recognized $13.6 million in deferred costs associated with the recognition of deferred RAM revenue, and year-to-date income tax increased $29.5 million due to higher pre-tax earnings. The impact of the year-to-date 2024 activity on diluted earnings per share is presented in the year-to-date 2024 to year-to-date 2023 to 2024 diluted earnings per share bridge on slide eight. The more significant earnings drivers are the 2021 general rate case, rate increases, and the decrease in deferred RAM revenue, which contributed $1.82, 44 cents, and 22 cents, respectively, to diluted earnings per share. These drivers were partially offset by increases in expenses captured in the ICBA of 13 cents per diluted share, the recognition of deferred RAM expenses of 19 cents per diluted share, and other factors net of 3 cents per diluted share. Turning to capital, we continue to make significant investments in our water utilities to help ensure the delivery of safe and reliable water service. Group capital investments during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2024, totaled $104.6 million and $214.4 million respectively, which is an increase of 9.8% and 21% respectively over the same period last year. As of June 30, 2024, we've completed 56% of our annual capital budget of $385 million. As a reminder, our planned 2024 capital investments and our estimated capital investments for 2025 to 2027 do not include $226 million of estimated PFAS projects that will be constructed over multiple years beginning in the second half of 2024. Greg will discuss the planned capital expense for 2025 to 2027 that we applied for in the 2024 GRC and infrastructure improvement plans later on on the call. The growth of our capital investment program is having a positive impact on our regulated rate base. Our overall rate base grew to an estimated $2.2 billion by the end of 2023. This is an increase of 9.4% over 2022. If approved, as requested, the 2024 California General Rate Case and Infrastructure Improvement Plan, coupled with the planned capital investments in our other water utilities, would result in a rate-based growth of between 9% and 14%. Moving to slide 11, we maintained a strong balance sheet with a capital structure of 59.5% equity and 45.5% debt. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, we raised approximately $52 million from the sale of a million shares of stock under our at-the-market, or ATM, stock equity program. We have $80 million remaining under the program that can be used to finance general corporate purposes, including planned capital investments and future strategic opportunities. On June 28, S&P affirmed our global credit rating of A-plus stable, We are pleased with this upgrade, which speaks to our ability to navigate the credit markets in our California water utility. On July 22nd, the CPUC issued a proposed decision authorizing Cal Water to issue up to $1.3 billion in new debt and equity securities. Cal Water anticipates the CPUC will approve the proposed decision during its August meeting. And just to mention, that yesterday our board of directors declared a $0.28 per share dividend for our stockholders of record on August 12, 2024. This was our 318th consecutive quarterly dividend. Wrapping up on slide 10, we continue to maintain a strong liquidity position. As of June 30, 2024, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $82.7 million of which $45.4 million was classified as restricted. Further, we had additional short-term borrowing capacity on our lines of credit of $355 million. With that, I'll turn the call over to Greg to give an update on our 2024 general rate case and other regulatory matters.
spk01: Greg? Thanks, Jim. On July 8, 2024, California Water Service submitted our infrastructure improvement plans for 2025 through 2027. as part of its tri-annual general rate case. CalWater proposes to invest more than $1.6 billion in its districts from 2025 to 2027. To enhance affordability, particularly for low-use, low-income customers, CalWater's application proposes a low-use water equity program that would decouple revenues from water sales across its regulated service areas. Filing requests total revenue increase of $140.6 million, or 17.1% increase, for 2026, $74.2 million, or 7.7% for 2027, and $83.6 million, or 8.1% for 2028. The tri-annual filing begins in approximate 18-month review process by the Commission. With that, I'll turn it over to Marty.
spk06: Great. Thank you, Greg. Thank you, Jim. I want to start off talking about the California Supreme Court case that came out on July 8th. As many of you probably have read, the California Supreme Court in a unanimous decision ruled in favor of the four investor on water utilities that brought suit against the PUC. It's very important to note that the decision helps preserve decoupling and also protects the rights of utilities to have due process in the rate making process. As you know, we are big believers in conservation. Decoupling in California goes back to the 70s when it was first used in the electric and gas industry and has played a major role in helping California reach its sustainability and renewability goals. We feel the outcome is really important because it enforces the importance of due process and rate making. In other words, the commission has to follow the rules that are set forth in the rate making process as well as the company. But it also allows us to continue to better align with the state of California's goals around sustainability, reliability, affordability, and conservation. If you follow the California rules over the last couple of years, California has gotten very aggressive at the state level about making conservation a way of life. As I mentioned, decoupling is a very important tool that helps keep our customer rates affordable as we promote conservation to improve sustainability of critical water resources. So we're very happy with the outcome from the state's report. And as Greg mentioned, in the current filing that we just filed earlier this month, we have again submitted plans for approval to reimplement decoupling for our customers in the state of California. Moving on to slide 14, I want to talk a little bit about where we are with fire season and our emergency response programs. If you've been watching the news or if you look at the fire maps for the state of California, there are times it feels like the majority of the state is really on fire. So far this year, we've had three major fires near our service territories. We've had the Thompson Fire, the Park Fire, and the Burrell Fire. Currently, as we speak, the Park Fire and the Burrell Fires are still burning. The Thompson Fire, which took place in early July, was around our Orville service area and burned approximately 3,800 acres in a very small community in Northern California. The Park Fire and the Burrell Fire, which started about a day apart, one was up in Chico, California, near Chico, California, which has burned, to date, as of this morning, 391,000 acres. That's equivalent percent contained the borel fire which is in bakersfield which is more central california in the kern river area has burned approximately 59 000 acres and is 39 with first responders, embedding our employees into the county and state EOCs to help coordinate water supply and to make sure that we do what we can to make sure firefighters have what they need to battle these wildfires. Unfortunately, it's very indicative that this is going to be a long fire season. As we get into the months of August, September, and October, I believe we'll be expending a lot of resources dealing with the continuation of what was a very wet winter and what now has been a very hot, dry summer. Along with that, one of the things we do each year is we set certain corporate goals to host a certain number of what we call community EOCs, or Community Emergency Operations Center exercises. We tend to target these exercises in communities that don't necessarily have all the resources to pull off full tabletop exercises, help communities and first responders better prepare for disasters. Recently, we hosted two of these events in the state of Hawaii, one on the island of Maui and one on the big island of Hawaii, or what's also known as the Kona Coast. Both of these events were very well attended by first responders, local and state officials, including members of the Hawaii Public Police Commission, civil defense, critical infrastructure companies, including the electric company, the county water department, dealing with these disasters. And my part of the presentation that I gave at the classes in Hawaii, and the classes include two pieces. There's a class piece of it, which is really how to use the incident command system, which is the basic FEMA model for dealing with emergencies. So that's the classroom-led part of the day. And the second part of it is a hands-on disaster simulation. As I told the people in the class that I was participating in, I of the goal that we connect, we communicate, and we coordinate. And when we do that as critical infrastructure companies helping first responders, we help save lives. And that's very, very important in the world that we live in today and a world that is dealing with climate change. Moving on to the next slide, I want to give you a brief update on where we are with the new PFAS, PFOA standards. We're moving forward with our plans to implement our treatments on approximately 101 wells. If you look at the footnote on Jim's slides, which are slide 9 and 10, you'll see that our estimates have changed a little bit based on more data that we've been able to gather as we pull our project plans together. So that number increased approximately $11 million to $226 million. treatment. By the way, that's 101 wells at about approximately 1,170 wells. I'll give you an idea of what part of our portfolio requires treatment. Just to remind everyone that the $226 million is not included in the capital forecast on the rate-based slide or the capital investment slide. It's included in the footnote. And the $1.6 billion that was included in the 2025 projections that we've given the street so far today. And we expect to refine these costs as more information comes in with a project plan. But overall, we're moving forward. We believe we will be adopting these standards ahead of schedule within our service territory. Our goal is to have them implemented within the next three years. And also, one important milestone that was reached in the quarter is that we did file our Phase 1 claim form in the 3M and DuPont Fast Action Settlement. as the class rep, and all PFAS matters representing the industry in those discussions. So overall, moving forward with the areas, our estimates moved up a little bit, but we are charging ahead as planned. Moving on to slide 16, just to give a brief update on what's happening on the business development and M&A side. It was a fairly quiet quarter for us. We did complete one very, very small but strategic acquisition called King's Mountain Park Mutual Water Company. The significance of this certainly is not its size, but it's the fact that this little system lies in between our Bear Gulch system and the Skylanda system here in the Bay Area that we acquired about a year ago. So our roots go back to Bear Gulch for a long, long time. We've owned and operated that system for a long time. Last year, we acquired the Skylanda system, and we just closed on the Kings Mountain system. Putting these three pieces together allows for a more efficient deployment of capital. It improves reliability and allows us to ultimately improve service to the customers in that area. More importantly, I think it's a good example of how we continue to consolidate and grow an existing service area that's been built out. If you know anything about the San Francisco Bay Area, this is on the peninsula side of the Bay Area as you go up the 101 corridor. So even when there are places that may not look like there might not be opportunities and try to become more efficient. Since 2019, we have completed over 36,000 connections that we've added to our platform using this kind of tuck-in strategy. And we anticipate that we will continue to add at least 1%, 1.5% new connections going out forward into the future using this strategy. Next, I want to take a moment to give an update on our ESG report that was filed in May. If you're interested in ESG, our plan aligns with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board and their Water Utility Service Industry Standards. It references the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, TCFD, and it references the Global Report Initiative Standards, GRI. So all that information is available in our plan. In the greenhouse gases, Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gases by 63% by the year 2035. We plan on accomplishing this through a multi-prong approach that includes electrification of our fleet, continuing aggressive water conservation, building alternative energy sources of supplies in some of our service areas, and aggressively going after renewable electricity procurement. As you may recall, water utilities use a lot of energy and pumping and transporting water. And we believe using this multi-pronged approach, we can easily achieve these goals by 2035 and hopefully ahead of schedule. In addition, I want to point out just a couple of fun things. You know, obviously the water quality compliance, that is a core part of our DNA that we meet and exceed all the primary and secondary water quality standards every day that we operate in all the states that we operate in. And that's a big part of our bonus plan that our employees participate in. But if you saw a few weeks ago, we announced that we just completed our 10th year of our scholarship program. So this year, Cal Water again awarded more than $80,000 to 12 students in California, Hawaii, and Washington. Since starting the program in 2014, we have awarded more than $750,000 to students in our service area, and we're very, very proud to do that. One of the things about being a 98-year-old water company sometimes is you forget about younger people. This program that we've been in now for a decade has been very, very successful, and it's a lot of fun going through the application process and looking at some of the students of our customers, many of whom are first-generation college students and what their goals and come back and help make their communities a better place. So we're very, very proud of that scholarship program. And then lastly, I want to share with everyone that recently ISS updated our ESG score to 72.28. So that's their raw score, 72.28. On their scale, that gives us a B+. And while a B plus is not an A, there are no A's. that have an ESG score in the water utility space. We are the highest rated ESG score for an investor on water utility in North America, according to ISS. So just kudos to our ESG team on our continuing implementation of our strategy as we move forward in dealing with climate change and how we support our communities, employees, and our shareholders.
spk03: Okay, so in conclusion, overall, solid quarter, as Jim mentioned.
spk06: I know the numbers are a little bit confusing. I'll apologize for that. That was circumstances beyond our control. You know, we had to book all the 21 rate case and 24 and not 23, but clearly you're seeing the benefit of the rate relief start to flow in with the company. I'm very, very happy with the capital numbers that Jim shared with you, the 9.9% kind of quarter over quarter and the 21%. kind of year-to-date growth on CapEx. I think that's indicative of our continued focus on our infrastructure improvement plans and how we're trying to improve sustainability and reliability on behalf of our customers. Q3 is typically our busiest quarter. It's usually our peak demand quarter from an operations perspective. As I mentioned, it's going to be busy just in the normal course of operations, but we're also dealing with a very significant fire season this year. And so, as I mentioned, we have two fires right now that we've been allocating resources to, the Borrell Fire and the Park Fire. So it's going to be a very, very busy quarter from a fire prevention perspective and working with our first responders to make sure they have what they need to fight fires. Having said that, it's also, we're in the middle of the rate case. And so all the data requests are coming in and going through on schedule. But overall, I'm very happy with the performance for the quarter. I'm happy we got our rate case filed on time. I'm happy that we are continuing our growth in our capital programs. And more importantly, I think I'm happy that we're doing what we do on the emergency response side. Because again, if you follow those three C's, you help save lives. And at the end of the day, I think that's one of the most important things that we do. So with that, Dee, I'm going to hand it back to you and we will open it up for questions.
spk00: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star 1 again. If you are called upon to ask your question or are listening via loudspeaker on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. Again, it is star 1 to join the queue. Our first question. comes from the line of Michael Gugler from Janie Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead.
spk02: Morning, everyone.
spk08: Morning, Michael. Just one question. Back on slide nine, the CapEx deck, looking out, the note at the bottom, Marty, I think you referenced this, that the estimates for 2024 to 2027 exclude PFAS-related capital investments. Given those investments are probably going to be made, I'm wondering what the cadence of that would look like across the years. Maybe not so much 2025, but maybe 26, 27, 28. Kind of where your thoughts are there.
spk06: Sure. So let's go back to what our kind of basic goal is, which is we try to balance affordability and new capital while keeping the investment rate about three times the rate of depreciation. So that usually gives us about a 9% to 10% compound annual growth rate on the CapEx line. Clearly, as you can see, there's a big step up in 2025 and 26 associated with the rate case. Now, those numbers, that's the full ask of the rate case. You never get 100% of what you ask for in the last rate case, Greg, I think. including the advice letters, we got about 79% of what we requested, which in the rate case prior to that, I guess that would have been the 18 rate case in California. We're in the 80s. Yeah, very similar. Yeah. So, you know, for planning purposes, Michael, you know, we're planning around that 9%, 10% CAGR on the CapEx. And the importance of that is it allows us to try to balance affordability on the rate side. The PFAS piece of it is, you know, that's a new standard that we have to comply with. And there was a lot of speculation on that because the EPA was a little slow on the uptake and getting the new requirements out. We run things like that. So things that are kind of newly being introduced into our portfolio as a separate program, because in the case of PFAS, we have one project team within our company that's coordinating all the PFAS projects across our enterprise. And so that will be incremental. So, you know, I think you could expect a higher number probably in that 26 and 27 year driven by the PFOS investment. And a number of variables will come into that. You know, obviously PFOS and PFOA and the forever chemicals have had a lot of press. And if you remember early on in the draft information that was communicated, they said, oh, we're going to have to implement it in three years. And they said, okay, no, and now it's a five-year implementation. it's really hard to look your customers in the eye and say, okay, five years from now, your water's not going to be safe, but don't worry about it until then, which is why we've made the commitment that we're going to invest the money up front. We're going after the PFAS treatments now, and we're starting the process this year to implement those, implementing treatment on those wells that need required treatment. So I think you're probably looking at for 2025 and 2026.
spk03: it'll be higher than 9.9% triggered by the PFAS. All right.
spk08: That's all I had, gentlemen. Thank you.
spk03: Thanks, Michael.
spk00: Our next question comes from the line of Davis Sanderland from Baird. Please go ahead.
spk04: Hey, Marty, Jim, Greg. Good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my question.
spk03: Sure.
spk04: Wanted to ask, going back to the business development pipeline, and I apologize, it might have been an error on my end, but I had some choppiness coming through when you were talking about that. Maybe just any thoughts on how things are shaping up with smaller systems, maybe having difficulties complying with the PFAS standards, and just any changes you've seen or opportunities that you've seen pop up related to some of these smaller systems that may fold into the acquisition pipeline or how you see this playing out. And then I have one follow-up.
spk06: Yeah, you know, it's interesting you ask that question. This week we had our person who's in charge of water quality out in one of the states that we operate in giving a presentation to commissioners about what is PFAS, PFOA mean. And the good news is we got really good feedback that they love what we're doing, but they said, wow, what are all these small systems in our state going to do? So I think you're starting to see an awakening that there's going to be a huge capital requirement in some of these small systems that are probably undercapitalized and lack liquidity. And I think that'll play to our benefit. The other thing in talking to our head of business development, Shilam Patel, you know, interest rates have been higher. The cost of capital has been up and seller expectations have remained pretty high. We're starting to see the seller expectations soften up a little bit, which is which is nice. And in the case of the deal I mentioned, the Kings Mountain, we actually purchased that system for a dollar because the company just, they couldn't, weren't the best operators. It requires capital. We have the ability to put that capital in the system, improve their service levels. And more importantly, it allows us to connect kind of the three systems and get that synergy of operating those three systems and those three sources of supply. So I think you're starting to see a little bit more movement in that area. Now, business development M&A, right, and the water space just moves slow. How fast of a catalyst will it be? I think that's to be determined. You know, I think the larger IOUs are held to a very, very high standard on water quality. And if we miss any new requirements, they find the heck out of us. But I think, you know, generally speaking, the EPA has a hard time enforcing those standards with private small companies that just aren't on the radar screen. And I think That piece will be interesting to watch. But certainly, we're seeing a softening of expectations with sellers, and I think we're starting to see a little bit more activity in small systems as these PFAS, P4 requirements come into play. And I think it's really important to keep talking about those new requirements, what does it mean, and why they're important.
spk04: Great. That's super helpful. Thank you for that. And then the only other one for me, you actually started to talk about it with Michael's question previously, just about never getting 100% of what you ask for. And I guess my question, just to frame it up a little differently, is have you had any pushback? Do you anticipate any pushback with proposed rate increases or any friction from the consumer advocates or thoughts there? Thanks, guys.
spk06: Frank, that's probably more a question for you.
spk01: Sure. It's still too early in the case. I mean, we just filed it July 8th. and we've started receiving data requests on it, but it's really still, we're three weeks in, so it's still too early to tell what their overall feeling will be.
spk03: Yeah, I would just add to that.
spk06: Look, inflation is high, and everyone's feeling it, and our customers are not exempt from that. Look, Cal Water's not exempt from that, and When we last month, I gave a presentation or an update to the board about our rate case. And before I gave them kind of what the numbers look like, I talked about what some of our cost increases were over the last three years. You know, labor's up 15 to 20 percent. Chemicals are up 35 percent, ductile iron's up 200 percent since 2022. So, you know, That's one of the reasons why we try to balance affordability. That's why decoupling is really important, frankly, because it allows you to implement a rate design that people who use less water, and especially people in underserved communities and people on fixed income, it allows you to potentially sell that water at below a marginal cost. And for the super users of water, the people who can afford to use a lot of water, you charge them more. And so one of the things I like in the GRC application that users of water who are typically the fixed income and maybe underserved communities and really ramps up the chart of people who can afford to pay the water bills and who want to use a lot more water. So I think it'll be interesting to see, but obviously affordability and inflation, it's a tough time right now.
spk03: That's great. Thanks, guys. Appreciate the time. Thank you. Thanks, Dennis.
spk00: Our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Reeder from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
spk05: Hey, good morning, team. Morning, Jonathan. You just addressed my questions around kind of the GRC and the CapEx and the rate impact, but on results itself, was there anything in the 70 cents of EPS that, you know, was kind of non-recurring or, you know, maybe a result of the retroactiveness of the 2021 GRC decision?
spk07: Well, certainly in the year-to-date numbers, we had the, I think there's $64 million of net income in the year-to-date numbers that, well, I think we recorded $64 million in 2024 of 2023 income that will not repeat itself In the deck, I think I also mentioned that we carved out $18.7 million of interim rate relief. So $18.7 million of that $64 million was attributable to the second quarter of 2023. So if people kind of want to get a sense of what the impact would have been had we had timely rate relief, that kind of gives you a little bit of sense of how 2023 was impacted. Now, as far as the quarterly results go, there really wasn't anything that was unique to the quarter other than the new rates, and those will continue on going forward that we did get in the 2021 rate case. So I guess if you're looking at year-to-date, I'd consider the fact that we did record the $64 million in Q1 of 2024. That will impact the entire year. But as far as the quarter goes, there was really nothing that was unique to the quarter.
spk03: Okay. That's helpful.
spk05: And then, along those lines, can you just help me understand what's included in the buckets on the Q2, like, EPS bridge slide, like, specifically, like, the 2021 GRC bucket versus, you know, the rate increase bucket? um like where did the new mechanisms you know having the new mechanisms fall versus just the 23 base rate increase over that interim that you're talking about versus the 24 attrition increase like where do each of those fall in those in those two different uh you know bars so so looking at the diluted earnings per share bridge the q2 2023 to q2 2024
spk07: bridge, if you take a look at the general rate case bucket or bar, that really relates to the impact of the new rate structure and the new rates that we implemented in 2023, or I'm sorry, in 2024, as it relates specifically to the 2021 rate case. The rate increases column or bar, if you will, that really relates to increases that we've had for water offsets, for advice letter filings, and for the delta, the change in our cost of capital mechanism. So that really captures rates outside of the new rate design and outside of the new rate structure of the 2021 rate case. And then the change in accrued revenue there, that's principally a result of the the change that we had in our unbilled revenue, both in the number of days and the rate impact from the 2021 general rate case.
spk05: Okay, so the 26 cents from the rate increase, does that include the 24 attrition increase related to, you know, the 2021 GRC?
spk07: no that would i believe that's also cap let me get back to you on that jonathan but i believe that's also captured in the 2021 general rate case i think that that captures all of the impact of the rate changes from the rate case okay you think the 23 cents has the attrition i think so yes okay and then on on that change in accrued revenues does that kind of pull forward earnings from q3 then No, that represents principally what we have already delivered in terms of water service, but have not yet billed our customers. So we record that revenue as an unbilled amount at the end of the quarter. We'll have a similar amount that we will bill at the end of Q3. And if there is a delta between the two of them, then we would certainly take that into consideration in terms of what the the net impact is on the change in the unbilled revenue. The fact that there's days involved in the Q2 number would imply that potentially there will be less in the unbilled amount going into Q3, but it's not going to be meaningful.
spk06: Tim, I probably, too, and I don't know this for certain on the numbers really, but it's been a warm summer. It's been a very warm summer.
spk07: And to Marty's point, especially if you take a look at the end of the quarter, the last couple weeks of June were very warm across all of our service territories, especially in California, but across all of our service territories. And we actually saw that in the first month of the Q3. So I think you'll see some of that change. If you're just focused on the number of days, that difference is going to be mitigated significantly by the weather and I think by usage and rates. I don't think it's going to have a meaningful impact.
spk05: Okay. And then, yeah, last question, just kind of segue to it with usage. Like, given the loss of decoupling and, you know, the warm summer and everything, how has usage been tracking versus, you know, what the rate case assumed?
spk07: Well, I think that's a good, it's a great question. Right now we're tracking about 2% ahead of where we were at this time last year. And that's principally driven by the fact that the first quarter of last year was very wet and rainy. And the first quarter of this year, we experienced more normal conditions. We still had a very good level of precipitation in the first quarter, but not to the same extent we did in the prior year. And then we had a really good July. So we're tracking, or June rather, the second quarter. So we're tracking pretty well in terms of our usage going into Q3. As it relates, I haven't gone back and checked to see how it relates in terms of the rate case. I can get back to you on that. But I think we were probably around 96% or right thereabouts. But I'll get the exact number for you. and can circle back with you on that.
spk05: Okay. That 96% might be on a year-to-date basis.
spk03: Yeah, that's a year-to-date. Yeah.
spk05: All right. Thanks so much for the time this morning, guys. Congrats on a great quarter. Thank you.
spk00: Again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone and wait for a name to be announced.
spk02: Again, it is star one to ask for a question.
spk00: There's no more question at this time. I will now turn the conference back over to Martin Korpelnicki, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer for closing remarks.
spk06: Great. Thank you, Dee. Thanks, everyone, for joining us here today. As we move into Q3, again, it's going to be the busiest quarter for us. services and the product that we provide. Look forward to giving an update on Q3 and meaningful progress we're making on our infrastructure improvement plans and also progress that we make on our PFAS, PFOA implementation plans. And really keep an eye on fire season. As I mentioned so far, this has been a really busy fire season. I don't know what the future holds. I don't have a crystal ball, but I will tell you it has been very busy from a fire season perspective so far this year. So we'll look forward to giving everyone a detailed update in Q3. And until then, please be safe. And we'll talk to everyone again real soon. Thank you for joining us here today. Thanks.
spk00: Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer