DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. We kindly ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you wish to withdraw your question, you may also press star 1 again. Thank you for that. And I would now like to turn the conference over to VP for Investor Relations, Anne Gian-Christoforo. You may begin.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us for DuPont's second quarter 2025 financial results conference call. Joining me today are Ed Breen, executive chairman, Lori Koch, chief executive officer, John Kemp, current electronics business president and CEO elect of the future CUNY Electronics Company, and Antonella Franzen, chief financial officer. We have prepared slides to supplement our remarks, which are posted on DuPont's website under the investor relations tab and through the webcast link. Please read the forward looking statement disclaimer contained in the slides. During this call, we will make forward looking statements regarding our expectations or predictions about the future. Because these statements are based on current assumptions and factors that involve risks and uncertainties, our actual performance and results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements. Our Form 10-K, as updated by our current and periodic reports, includes detailed discussion of principal risks and uncertainties which may cause such differences. Unless otherwise specified, all historical financial measures presented today are on a continuing operations basis and exclude significant items. We will also refer to other non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is included in our press release and presentation materials and have been posted to DuPont's Investor Relations website. I'll now turn the call over to Lori who will begin on slide three.

Good morning and thanks everyone for joining our second quarter call. Earlier today, we reported another solid quarter ahead of our previously communicated guidance. Second quarter sales of 3.3 billion grew 2% on an organic basis. Operating EBITDA of 859 million increased 8% year over year, resulting in operating EBITDA margin of 26.4%, an increase of 120 basis points from the prior year. Adjusted EPS of $1.12 was up 15% year over year. As a result of our strong second quarter financial performance, we are raising our full year earnings guidance. Antonella will provide further details shortly. Second quarter saw continued strength in electronics driven by AI technology demand in both interconnect solutions and semi and strong volume growth in healthcare and water. This momentum is continuing into the third quarter with order patterns remaining strong through July. Weakness in construction continue to impact our diversified industrial business during the quarter. I also wanted to highlight that yesterday, joining me with Chemours and Corteva, we announced a settlement with the state of New Jersey to comprehensively resolve all current and future environmental claims, including PFAS, across the four current and former operating sites and statewide for PFAS claims. The settlement will be payable over a 25-year period, and our portion of the total settlement is $177 million on an NPV basis. Importantly, this settlement also includes AFFF, which was less than 1% of the total settlement amount. The settlement is subject to final court approval. Regarding our separation milestone, progress on the intended spinoff of CUNY Electronics continues and we remain on track for a November 1st separation date. In June, we completed the composition of the community board, adding two new members that bring a depth of experience and knowledge of the semiconductor sector that complements the existing diverse set of skills. The community board will be comprised of 10 members, including John Kemp. We filed a First Amendment to the Form 10 Registration Statement with the SEC in June, which included additional pro forma financial information. This will continue to be an iterative process with the SEC as we progress towards separation. Turning to slide four, we are pleased to announce that we will be holding an Investor Day on September 18th for DuPont and CUNY, focused on introducing both portfolios and their respective strategies for driving value creation. I continue to be excited about what lies ahead for both future independent companies and the investment potential for each. For the new DuPont as a leading advanced solutions provider and CUNITY as a pure play technology solutions leader within the semiconductor value chain. As we look forward to the new DuPont, we've assembled a highly experienced senior leadership team consisting of a healthy mix between in-house and external talent who bring great experience in driving growth and margin expansion. To highlight a few of our new leaders, Irun Blumhardt currently leads our healthcare and water technologies business. Irun has both internal and external experience in complex global markets with a strong focus on commercial excellence, as well as a growth mindset. Beth Ferreira recently joined our team to lead our diversified industrial business. Beth brings deep experience and global perspective in the industrial space with key roles at ITW and IMI, where she successfully led transformation efforts, drove operational efficiencies, and fostered a customer-centric culture. David Cook just recently joined us from Danaher and will be our Chief Operations and Engineering Officer. Dave brings extensive knowledge and operational excellence with a proven track record of driving performance improvement and implementing business systems. Lori Southwood- The new dupont will have a more focused portfolio highlighted by high growth, health care and water and market with a continued emphasis on innovation and customer relationships, we are well positioned to accelerate growth for a more agile and focus organization with that i'll now turn the call over to john.

Thanks lori and good morning everyone. As we approach our November 1st spinoff, CUNY is poised to emerge as a premier pure play technology solutions partner to the semiconductor value chain. With a leading portfolio, a focused business model, and global and local scale, I could not be more excited about CUNY's future. Established with decades of innovation, quality, consistency, and technical know-how, We are a trusted partner to the world's leading semiconductor customers and electronics industry OEMs. Our broad and uniquely positioned portfolio brings end-to-end solutions and competitive advantages that span the entire electronics value chain, enabling AI applications as well as high-performance computing and advanced connectivity. CUNITY is well-positioned for growth, powered by a large and expanding addressable market and multiple industry tailwinds. I am equally excited about our upcoming Investor Day. At that event, I will share more about our portfolio and strategy, unique competitive advantages, and innovation engine to drive long-term growth. I will now turn the call over to Antonella to cover the financials and outlook.

Thanks, John, and good morning, everyone. I am pleased with another quarter of organic growth and margin improvement as continued volume growth across many key end markets, and operational focus by our team drove strong financial performance in the quarter, including solid cash conversions. Beginning with second quarter financial highlights on slide five. Net sales of 3.3 billion increased 3% versus the year-ago period on 2% organic sales growth. Organic sales growth consisted of a 4% increase in volume, partially offset by a 2% decline in price. Currency was a 1% benefit in the quarter. From a segment view, both segments saw organic sales growth with Electronics Co. and Industrials Co. up 6% and 1% respectively. Organic growth during the quarter was led by high single digit growth in interconnect solutions and healthcare and water technologies, along with mid single digit strengths in semi. From a regional perspective, Asia Pacific delivered 4% organic sales growth year over year. Organic sales were up 2% in Europe and 1% in North America. Second quarter operating EBITDA of 859 million increased 8% versus the year-ago period as organic growth and productivity benefits were partially offset by growth investments. Operating EBITDA margin during the quarter of 26.4% increased 120 basis points year over year. Turning to free cash flow, we delivered transaction adjusted free cash flow of $433 million and related conversion of 93% in the quarter. This was in line with our expected acceleration. Turning to slide six, adjusted EPS for the quarter of $1.12 per share increased 15% from 97 cents in the year-ago period. Higher segment earnings of 11 cents drove the year-over-year increase, along with a lower tax rate, which resulted in a 4-cent benefit. Turning to segment results, beginning with Electronics Co. on slide 7. Second quarter net sales of $1.2 billion increased 6% versus the year-ago period on both a reported and organic basis due to an 8% increase in volume partially offset by a 2% decrease in price. Currency was about flat during the quarter. At the line of business level, organic sales for semiconductor technologies were at mid-single digits on continued strong market demand driven by advanced nodes and AI technology applications. Semi-demand was better than expected, driven by timing shifts of about 15 million from the third quarter into the second quarter primarily in china interconnect solutions also posted another strong quarter with organic sales of high single digits reflecting continued demand from ai driven technology ramps and benefits from content and share gains across advanced packaging and thermal management solutions operating ebitda for electronics co of 373 million was up 14% versus the year-ago period as organic growth and lower legal costs were partially offset by growth investments to support advanced new transitions and AI technology ramps. Operating EBITDA margin during the quarter was 31.9%, up 220 basis points versus the year-ago period. Turning to slide eight. IndustrialsCo's second quarter net sales of $2.1 billion were up 1% versus the year-ago period on both a reported and organic basis, as 2% volume growth was partially offset by a 1% decline in price. Currency was about flat during the quarter. For the second quarter, healthcare and water sales were up high single digits on an organic basis versus the year-ago period, with strong growth in both businesses. Diversified industrial sales were down low single digits on an organic basis due primarily to softness in construction markets. Operating EBITDA for industrials code during the quarter of 509 million was up 3% versus the year-ago period on organic growth and productivity gains. Operating EBITDA margin during the quarter was 24.4%, up 50 basis points from the year-ago period. Turning to slide nine, which outlines our latest view on 2025 financial guidance. From a top line perspective, the midpoint of our full year total company net sales guidance of $12.85 billion remains unchanged as currency benefits are offset by volume softness, primarily due to a delayed recovery in construction and markets. We are raising the midpoint of our full year operating EBITDA and adjusted EPS guidance to $3.36 billion and $4.40 per share, respectively, driven by our stronger second quarter performance, which more than offsets the net impact of tariffs now incorporated into the outlook. The net tariff impact assumed in the second half of 2025 is currently estimated as a $20 million headwind, or 4 cents per share, equally split between the third and fourth quarter. Our updated guidance assumes no earnings benefit related to currency fluctuations versus the prior guide given our geographic cost base. For the third quarter, we estimate net sales of about 3.32 billion, operating EBITDA of about 875 million, and adjusted EPS of $1.15 per share. which includes a two-cent headwind related to tariffs and a five-cent year-over-year headwind related to tax. Our third quarter guidance assumes about 3% organic sales growth versus the prior year, led by continued growth in healthcare, water, and electronics and markets, partially offset by continued weakness in construction and markets. Overall, another solid quarter and strong first half of the year. I want to thank our employees for delivering these results and for their ongoing support of the separation process. With that, we are pleased to take your questions, and let me turn it back to the operator to open the Q&A.

And with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll take our first question from Scott Davis of Mellius Research.

Hey, good morning, everyone, Laurie and Antonella. Good morning. Paul Cecala, I just wanted to drill in a little bit on industrials, because in three months it's going to be a standalone. The 1% price, would I assume that's mostly just due to the tieback weakness and some price you have to kind of give up in that business when material costs are down?

Yeah, morning, Scott. No, it's more related to the price that we took through the inflationary period and having to give back a little bit as the raw material environment resolved. So it really was more in the diversified industrial space. There really wasn't anything in the in that tieback or health care space. So we look to reduce that price headwind as we go through this year, just as we lap some of the concessions that started in twenty twenty four.

Okay, and will there be an effort to capture price to offset the tariff impacts then as well, Lori?

We do have some, but the majority of the reductions is related to supply chain moves, so we're able to move product around to avoid the tariffs. There is a little bit of surcharges that we put in to offset, but the majority of the benefits reducing the gross headwind down to the $20 million net headwind is from supply chain moves.

Okay. That's it for me. I'll pass it on. Thank you. Best of luck in the spin.

Thank you. Thank you.

All right.

Next up, we have Jeff Sprague of Vertical Research Partners.

Hey, thank you. Good morning, everyone. Hey, good morning. Hey, on the settlement, obviously nice to see that done. Very interesting comment, right, that AFFF was, you know, 1% of the settlement amount. you know, you've made a long-time argument, right, that you shouldn't really be embroiled in AFFF to a significant degree. But I just wonder how we should read that across. You know, one could maybe guess that New Jersey was so big and complicated and there was so much going on that AFFF considerations were really way down the pecking order. But perhaps not. I would just, I'd love your thoughts on how to read that 1% across to other outstanding AFFF kind of open issues that you're dealing with.

Yeah, we were definitely happy to announce the settlement and get another one behind us. And the real important piece for us was it's paid over a 25-year period. So the cash flow is related to the settlement material to the overall DuPont cash flows at any period. But to your question, The settlement amount that was related to AFFF is in line with where we said the original water district settlement case would be with about 3% to 7% of the total headwind belonging to DuPont. So if you take our portion that's related to AFFF and compare it to the 3M announcement earlier in New Jersey, it's in that 5% range, so right in the middle of that 3% to 7%. So that was really important for us to get out there to kind of give an indication of where future settlements And states where we didn't have a site could land with respect to the overall landscape.

Yeah, Jeff, we have one more state where we have a site where we've done significant remediation and we continue to. So at some point, you'll probably see something there that will be North Carolina. But every other state is a triple F and should fall, as Lori said, as this one did, in between that 3% to 7%. And then remember, the 3% to 7% were a third of the 3% to 7% at DuPont. Yeah. And one of the other things we liked about this, as Lori mentioned, it was over 25 years. So I think there's opportunities to structure things like that for the others.

Yeah, that's great to hear. And then just back to the brighter side of Industrial Co., just looking at health care and water, were they up collectively high single digits or both individually were up high single digits? But really, my real question is, Just, you know, I would assume we're kind of through the inventory liquidations that have been weighing on those end markets. But can you give some color on that? Have we recoupled the end demand? Anything else going on in the channel there? And just how you see, you know, the back half playing out in those businesses?

Yeah, no, they were both up nicely. So health care was a little bit ahead of water with respect to growth, but both up nicely. And as you had mentioned, they're decoupling from the lapping of the desock that happened in both RO on the water side and then in medical packaging on the Tyvek side. So really starting to get to a nice position. As we look to the back half of the year, we'll continue to expect outsized growth versus the rest of the portfolio in health care and water. really a lot of opportunities on the water side, just given the secular trends around access to clean water and desalination, and on the healthcare side, just with the aging population. And we've also been pretty clear that we'll look to add to those pieces of the portfolio as we go forward from an M&A perspective. So really starting to try to bolster that piece today. It's about 40% of the portfolio. We'll look to increase that as we can advance some of our M&A activities.

We've had some people play in healthcare, mention uncertainty about Medicaid, Medicare reimbursements and the like. You're not seeing any of that sort of pressure in your business?

No.

Great. Thank you.

You're welcome. All right. Next up, we have Steve Tusa of JPMorgan.

Hi. Good morning. Good morning. Just on the electronics trends that are going on out there, there's just a lot of mixed messages. How do you see this cycle in totality? Are you guys at a normalized run rate of growth? Are we at a bottom in some of the consumer markets, and therefore, things can accelerate? What is, do you think, the broad messaging on the electronic side?

Thanks, Steve. Great question, and I know there's been a lot of discussion already over the last couple of weeks as lots of industry players have reported already. What I would say is that we continue to be in a fairly mixed environment. Really, all of the growth so far for the last several quarters is really coming from AI-driven applications across advanced nodes, advanced packaging, and data center. Most of the rest of the electronics economy kind of remains relatively weak. I think we're starting to see the green shoots of stabilization and recovery on the lagging edge parts of the market. And we expect kind of slow improvement as we move through the back half of the year for the more industrial focused lagging edge semiconductor nodes. And then we still have a relatively weak consumer environment where, you know, consumer devices are expected to be up kind of low single digits. So we're really happy with the growth that we've seen in the position of our portfolio with advanced technologies and data centers and advanced packaging. But as we go forward and we start to see broader recovery, I think there's plenty of opportunity to see continued improvement.

And then just one follow-up to that. I guess there was some news around some changes in the way that they're assembling and manufacturing some of these chips with, I guess, direct to the board type of process. I'm certainly not an expert on this. I'm not sure if you guys have heard about that or looked at it and what that would mean for kind of your content in general on some of these new chips if they change that process.

Yeah, Steve, look, I think that's, you know, those types, we've said for a long time that we see convergence across the technology roadmaps between the chip fabrication and the semi roadmaps, as well as the printed circuit board roadmaps. And that kind of converges mostly in the advanced packaging space. But because we have a really nice position kind of on both ends of that spectrum, we're able to sit down at the table with our customers and and understand their end-to-end manufacturing process, their system integration, and really work with them to solve problems. And to your point, we're seeing an increased number of engagements broadly with all of the industry leaders to help solve those challenges across both sides of our portfolio.

Great. Thanks a lot. Good luck.

All right. Next up, we have Chris Parkinson of Wolf Research.

Great, thank you. John, if I could just ask that question slightly differently. When I take a step back and I look at the environment heading into 2026, I think most people are aware of the kind of the no transitions, but when you think about your portfolio and where you stand and what you're seeing in terms of second half growth rates and where you think you could ultimately be, could you just quickly comment on what you're seeing across, you know, semi-advanced packaging and ICS in terms of, you know, data center HPC and hyperscalers. It seems like there's some divergent growth rates, but things should ultimately be moving in the right direction over the next 12 months. So I'd love to hear your thoughts on that.

Thank you. Yeah, Chris, thanks for the question. I think you're absolutely right. The hyperscalers, for the most part, seem to continue to be very robust in their investments and continuing to put in capacity. And we see ongoing node migrations to support those investments from our customers. We're really excited as we get into the second half of the year on the node migrations, particularly at N2, as well as some of the HBM, whether that's 3E or 4 on the DRAM side. We're really well positioned with content gains on both N2 and on the HBM side. So we see that as a net positive as those more advanced nodes start to scale. And then to the comment I made earlier, as we start to see a broader market recovery, both in the more industrial parts of the market and the consumer parts of the market, as we start to see some of those refresh cycles kick up, obviously that will be a nice plug as well. And as it gets into more of 2026, you know, stay tuned for that. As we mentioned, we'll be doing Investor Day in mid-September, and we'll provide a lot more color on the trends that we're seeing kind of in the second half of the year and heading into next year. Thank you for the extra detail.

All right. Next up, we have John McNulty of BMO Capital Markets.

Yeah, thanks for taking my question. Wanted to dig into health care and water a little bit more. The high single digit growth certainly looks like it did better than what we saw from most in water and actually most in health care as well. I guess, can you speak to the drivers that you're seeing there? Which of them are kind of industry or end market driven and which ones are maybe some of your own initiatives that may be helping to accelerate the growth? Thanks.

Dana, thanks. So a little bit was the recovery. So this was probably the last quarter we would see the outsized number because of the slapping of the D-stock last year on the RO side and on the medical packaging side and then also on the Livio side. So on the biopharma side, we're seeing nice growth there. But underlying... it really just goes back to the megatrends, and we're really well positioned to take advantage of those. So we've got really great customer relationships. We're leading positions in really all the end markets that we compete in. We've done a really nice job on the water side to really shore up our position in China. So we had mentioned that last year we saw a bit of a destock, especially within the distributor channels that led to negative growth in 2024. And we quickly corrected that and got us back on track to see really nice share regain within the China on the RO side. So it's really just being well positioned in a nicely growing market. And as I had mentioned, we'll continue to try to add to that portfolio so that we can continue to drive outsized growth for the new DuPont.

Got it. Okay. Thanks. Thanks for the color on that. And then maybe just the second question, just look, you're splitting up a company has a lot of things to do as I'm sure you're You're all seeing, I guess, where does M&A and building up a list of assets for potential acquisition and the team to evaluate them, where does that fit kind of in your to-do list? And how should we be thinking about that? And how are the boards thinking about that when the assets actually do split come November?

Yeah, so obviously the first priority for us is getting Q&A separated. So we're well on track with that separation. We'll have the go live internally on October 1st and then obviously the formal separation on November 1st. But our strategy organization and a lot of, you know, my time and Antonella's time is spent looking at making sure we've got the right pipeline from an MA perspective to be proactive when we have the opportunity. So we spend a lot of time discussing this with the board around where the key components are There's a lot of fragmentation left within the healthcare space that we'll look to continue to take advantage of. Obviously, we completed Spectrum and Donatel the past couple of years that really gave us nice positions in the med device space and we'll look to add on there and the same in water. So, you know, making the decision earlier this year to keep water in the portfolio was the right one and we'll continue to add to it. So it's a key focus of our strategy team. they're not really involved in the separation work that goes on, so they can obviously dedicate their full time to looking and scouting out new opportunities for us.

Thanks very much for the caller.

All right, so next up we have David Begleiter of Deutsche Bank.

Thank you, good morning. John, just an Internet Connect solution, sorry. organic sales growth did slow versus Q1, or the rate of growth did slow. Can you talk to why that occurred?

Yeah, I think it's really just the year-over-year comp. So first quarter of 2024, we were still kind of in the midst. The recovery hadn't really started yet. And so first quarter of 2024 was a pretty easy comp, and we started to see acceleration in growth and the recovery, especially on the AI and advanced packaging side, really starting in the second quarter and then continuing through the back half of 2024. So, you know, the ICS has now posted several really strong quarters on the back of some great wins and share gains in both advanced packaging and data centers. And we expect that momentum to continue into the back half of the year.

Perfect. And, Laurie, in the PFAS news yesterday, you're agreeing to buy rights and insurance proceeds from Chemours. Can you discuss why you're doing that and what that means for potential future support from DuPont to Chemours? Thank you.

Yeah, so together with Corteva, we did that to ensure that, you know, that Comores had the ample liquidity to be able to make the payments over the next five years. And I think they were making statements that it covered them through 2030. So they should be in a really nice position to be able to make those payments as they come due. And I think reiterating what we had said earlier, just the 25-year payment schedule was really key to that announcement and sets a precedent, hopefully, for future announcements. So that was really... The reason behind it, we obviously have the MOU broadly governing the payments between the three parties, and I think it's been working really well for us.

Yeah, and we're also highly confident we're going to recover the insurance money, so it's not a freebie. We'll get paid back on that.

Thank you.

All right. Next up, we have Josh Spector of UBS.

Yeah, hi, good morning. I wanted to ask a question for John about the mix in electronics. I think one of the learnings from us from the Form 10 filings was the greater share of China exposure within CUNY. It's about 34%, almost double where some of the peers are. And I think some of the commentary in the industry is higher exposure to leading edge nodes, which helps drive above average growth. Can you just square that view versus higher exposure in China and why that is, I guess, good exposure in your opinion. Thanks.

Yeah, thanks, Josh. So when you look about China for Acunity, last year, and I think this is what's in the Form 10, we had about $1.4 billion. It's just over $30. It's about a third of our total sales. When you look at that, more than half of that is really coming from the ICS part of the portfolio and the PCB and and assembly, and that's just a function of where that part of the market is, and the preponderance of printed circuit board and assembly manufacturing in the world is taking place in China. And so it's somewhat natural that our position with the technology leaders in that space would give us some outside sales in China. And then on the semi side, you know, it's about, nominally, it's about $650 million in A part of that is going to multinational companies who are manufacturing in China. And then we've seen the startup of a lot of new fabs in China over the last couple of years. And we're well positioned in the startup environment because of the quality and the reputation of our materials. So that's what's fueled a lot of the growth that we've seen specifically in China. As we look forward, we've said... Over the last couple of quarters, we've said we expect a normalization of growth in China. I would expect that to come down to be kind of, if you take kind of 2024 and the acceleration out, typically we would expect to be about 30% of sales in China, and I think that's kind of where we'll normalize to. that's pretty consistent with others in the industry. And I think China's a large and growing market in electronics, and we're well positioned to win in China. And particularly in, like I said, in some of the circle board and assembly technologies, where we've got local teams on the ground there, and we're doing a lot of local for local type strategies. As supply chain shift based on kind of geopolitical or other requirements, you know, we've got a really good global position and we'll shift with our customers as those supply chains evolve over time.

Thanks. That's very helpful. I wanted to ask separately just if you can comment at all on if there is a process on aramids, divestments, and, you know, if so, I guess how you're thinking about in the context of an investor day in a month and a half, is there a goal to maybe have a firm view of if that's in or not the portfolio before that happens to make an easier communication story for you on the remain code DuPont, or is this just ongoing and we'll see where it ends up?

And I think so. I mean, no comment. Our focus right now, obviously, as mentioned, is getting CUNY out the door on November 1. So no comment on the air of speculation. You know, we have been pretty clear, though, that we'll look to shift the focus of the portfolio towards the the health care and the water and that we had incremental portfolio work that we would probably be doing for new dupont so um you know i'll kind of leave it at that so no incremental comments to the news out there okay thank you next up we have john roberts of mizzou

Thanks. Let me ask this maybe a different way. The agreement with Chemours and Corteva has a minimum EBITDA requirement. So if you do decide to further focus from Maine to ours, how much EBITDA could you divest without going below the minimum requirement? Or does the lower leverage that you're going to have at Maine Coast signal that you're going to do acquisitions first? That might give you some headroom over that minimum EBITDA requirement.

Yeah, so we'll reset the minimum EBITDA between CUNY and New DuPont at separation, and that'll kind of set the new minimum floor for each of those entities. So there will be a cushion in each side if there wanted to be incremental divestment to be made to be able to morph the portfolio. So there is room there at the outset. Obviously, the intent, I think, on both organizations, if there were divestments, would be to redeploy the proceeds in M&A to continue to grow. so that you don't run into problems with the core type of side letter agreement. But there will be some cushion at the outset. So, you know, today our combined EBITDA is over, so each of them will have an over.

Thank you. Thanks. All right. Next up, we have Alexei Yefremov of KeyBank Capital Markets. Alexei, your line is now open. Perhaps you have us on mute, Alexi.

I think we can just move to the next question.

Will do. Patrick Cunningham of Citi.

Hi. Good morning, everyone. You had pretty robust, you know, margin performance in industrials and posting pretty strong incremental margins despite price down. And can you help us think about the margin progression for the second half, given you've lapped the bulk of destocking and maybe have some additional mixed normalization there?

Yes, we have had very strong margin performance, and I would say better margin performance than we initially anticipated at the beginning of the year. And quite honestly, when you look at our updated guidance and you kind of take a look at where we're at, I would say on an overall basis, although we expect about 70 basis points of margin expansion from an underlying basis, so when you kind of put to the side the impact of tariffs and the impact of FX, it's actually more of 100 basis points of margin expansion. So we're definitely doing better than we had originally anticipated. And to your point, focusing on Industrials Co. explicitly, although our organic growth has been relatively low, the team is very focused on productivity, which is clearly helping drive the incremental margins. And particularly in the second quarter, I would say very strong incrementals in that 70% range, and we'll continue to post nice margins on the industrial side.

That's helpful. And then just to follow up on industrial, so on pricing, just to clarify, we should expect less of a drag from pricing the second half. And now that this will be a standalone business, how should we think about pricing across some businesses in a more normalized environment?

Yeah, so as Lori mentioned earlier, so one, yes, we will continue to see pricing be less of a component of that in terms of price going down. As Lori mentioned earlier, where we have been seeing some of the pricing is on the diversified industrial side. Because when you take a look back at the last couple of years, we had some really strong pricing that clearly more than offset the impact of some of the increased costs that we had. So we always take a look at the trade-off between volume and price, and you always got to look at each business individually when you're doing that from a line of business level. And what's most important at the end is that we continue to grow the business from an organic perspective and continue to have healthy margins.

Great. Thank you so much.

All right. Next up, we have Michael Sisson of Wells Fargo.

Hey, good morning. Just for Industrial Co., you know, volumes and EBITDA performance this year has been, you know, much more stable than my traditional chemical coverage. Anything else to point out to folks as you look to maybe shift that SIC code to industrials or manufacturing versus chemicals that you might highlight at your analyst day, but just give us maybe a preview of the case there given the results this year?

Yeah, I think when you kind of take a look at our portfolio, it's pretty clear that Industrials Co. is an industrial company and not a chemical company. And I think that kind of shows through clearly within our performance. So when you take a look at kind of the composition of Industrials Co. and 40% of it being in healthcare and water, and then even when you look at the diversified side, although there are a couple of different components within that piece of portfolio, it's clearly much more akin to an industrial portfolio. And I think that that's very clear. We are continuing to progress down the path relative to the GIX code. It will be looked at, and we'll see ultimately where we land, but I think that there's no question that we're an industrials company.

Great. And a quick follow-up for Electronics Co. Can you remind us kind of where we're at in terms of how much the portfolio is in advanced nodes and how much AI will continue to drive the growth there down the road?

Yeah, Michael. So for advanced nodes, we have about 35% of our semiconductor exposure is in advanced nodes, which compares to about kind of 20% of the total industry. So nice outsized outperformance there, which is kind of contributing to us growing better than the market. On the AI side, you know, what we've said before is AI high performance computing and data center is is about 15% of our portfolio, and it's growing nicely. In the second quarter, for example, we saw growth rates above 20% in that AI data center space. So really, really pleased by the performance there.

Great. Thank you.

And next up, we have Frank Mitch of Fermium Research.

Yes. Hi, good morning. Um, so the, uh, the Chinese investigation into, uh, into Tyvek, uh, was dismissed. I was curious if you have any further, uh, uh, dialogue with, uh, with the Chinese and, you know, are there any, uh, other investigations that, uh, that they may or may not be undertaking?

No, no. So we were happy to see it suspended and closed. And so, you know, it was, it was when it first came out, news that we quickly said was related to Tyvek and Tyvek only, and now it's been suspended. So we were happy with that conclusion.

All right, terrific. And then, you know, the adjustment downward of the tariff impact from $60 million to $20 million, can you provide any more context on the $20 million? And, you know, could that, you know, obviously things are changing on a daily basis, but any context you can provide around that, the expectations for the $20 million?

Yes, so to your point, it does tend to change on on a day to day basis, but based upon where we're at, I would tell you that what we included in in our guidance is based on the 90 day polls that went into effect. in May, and we are assuming that that kind of holds through through the remainder of the year. There have been a couple other changes, particularly related to tariffs on the EU and India, that we've put into our number. I think the latest news that potentially came out Sunday night into Monday is not necessarily included in the 20 million. We continue to watch it closely, as do all other companies, and continue to work our mitigating actions as we move forward.

Thank you so much.

Next up, we have Vincent Andrews of Morgan Stanley.

Thank you, and good morning. Just wanted to revisit Electronics Co. and the margins and maybe some thoughts into the 3Q on the margins. You know, you had volume up 8%. It sounds like that had some favorable mix to it as well, but price was down two, and you still got EBITDA margins up 220 basis points, which is obviously a robust increase. There was also a callout of lower legal costs. Could you just help us understand, you know, which parts of that are sustainable into where the margin in 3Q should be and how you're able to offset that negative price? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks. Thanks, Mitch. Now, the price decline that we saw, it's really more of a mix issue with the strong growth that we had in ICS. typically has a slightly lower margin than our semi-business. So as the ICS business, as a percentage of the sales is a little bit higher, it brings the margin down just a little bit, but not too much, still pretty healthy levels. As it relates to the overall margin potential, very similar to what Antonella commented on earlier, the teams continue to do a really nice job of balancing the volume and price equation and then driving underlying productivity. Obviously, as we get more volume, we do see nice incrementals as we put more volume through the plant sites. And then the teams continue to drive additional productivity on top of that, giving us opportunity to continue to invest in our technology roadmaps to really sustain and fuel the organic growth of the business. So I feel good about kind of where margins are at, and I think they're in a quite healthy place for us as we look to the second half of the year.

Okay, thank you. And Antonella, if I could ask you on sundry expense, there's been a pretty big swing in it year to date of about $137 million. How much of that is stuff that sort of was one-time items and was excluded versus stuff that... you know, is actually in the numbers? And where do you think that they'll wind up being for the full year? Is it just sort itself out through the course of the year? And is there some way we can tease it out of the guidance that's on, I think it's slide 14 that you have the below the line stuff?

Yeah. So when you look at our sundry expense, one of the big things in there is the market to market on the swap. So that's really what's driving the number within that line item. And that is excluded from our underlying results that we support on.

Okay. All right. Thanks very much.

All right, and with that, our final question for today will come from Aaron Viswanathan of RBC Capital Markets.

Hi, this is Adam on for a round. Thanks for taking my question and congratulations on a great quarter. You know, you guys have already spoken at length about the reasons for the cancellation of the water spin previously, but, you know, looking past the community spin, November Are you looking at the water business as core to the new DuPont, or do you think you could potentially revisit that in the future?

No, thanks for the question. Yeah, we definitely see it as core to the new DuPont. So, you know, the decision to keep and shore up the growth portfolio and then do DuPont was the right one. So we've got roundly 40% of our revenue today in health care and water, and we'll look to add to that to bolster it and get it expanded.

increase in the future so no intent to do anything but grow and invest in the business great thanks for that and if i could slip in one more just to dig a little bit more into the tariff comments you mentioned that you're taking a lot of mitigating factors is that mostly from moving volumes around your network changes in procurement i think you also mentioned local for local strategy or is it a combination of all that any additional color on that would be hopeful thanks

Yeah, so I would say about more than 90% of it is really related to supply chain movements. And then as Laurie mentioned earlier, there is a small piece related to surcharges.

Thank you.

And with that, ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude our Q&A session. So I'll turn things back over to Anne for concluding remarks.

Great. Thank you, everyone, for joining our call. For your reference, a copy of our transcript will be posted to DuPont's website, This officially concludes today's call. Thank you.

All right, ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude your call. You may now disconnect your lines, and thank you again for joining us today.