This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Greetings, everyone, and welcome to Masonite's second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. After management's prepared remarks, investors are invited to participate in a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Rich Leland, Vice President, Finance, and Treasurer. Thank you and good morning, everyone.
spk06: We appreciate you joining us today. With me on the call today are Howard Heckes, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Russ Tijima, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Tony Hare, President of Global Residential, will also be joining us for the Q&A session. We issued a press release and earnings presentation yesterday after the market closed, reporting our second quarter 2021 financial results. These documents are available on our website at masonite.com. Before we begin, let me remind you that this call will include forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement contained in this call is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in such statements. Additional information regarding these factors appears in the section entitled Forward-Looking Statements in the press release we issued yesterday. More information about risks can be found under the heading Risk Factors in Masonite's most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K and our subsequent Form 10-Qs, which are available at sec.gov and at masonite.com. The forward-looking statements in this call speak only as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of these statements. Our earnings released in today's discussion include certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the reconciliations, which are in the press release and the appendix of the earnings presentation. Our agenda for today's call includes a business overview from Howard, a review of the second quarter from Russ, along with our thoughts on the second half of the year and our updated 2021 financial outlook. Lastly, Howard will provide some closing remarks and will host a question and answer session. And with that, let me turn the call over to Howard. Thanks, Rich. Good morning and welcome everyone. Before we review our second quarter results, I want to take a minute and thank our more than 10,000 employees who are working tirelessly in a very difficult operating environment to service our customers to the best of their ability. Whether you're an HR generalist working to hire key talent, a supply chain leader seeking high quality best component options, or a production worker in one of our many factories around the world, I know it's been a crazy year and a half. I'm proud of the work that you are doing and the progress we are making as we transform our company to consistently grow through providing reliable supply, winning at the point of sale, and driving specified demand for doors that do more. It's a great time to be at Masonite, and I couldn't be prouder of our team. Let's move to slide four for a second quarter overview. We delivered record levels of net sales and adjusted EBITDA since becoming an NYSE listed company in 2013. Net sales increased 33% year-on-year and adjusted EBITDA was up 20% year-on-year to $111 million. This strong performance was primarily driven by higher base volumes in our residential businesses as we lapped the initial impacts of COVID-19 last year, along with higher average unit price, or AUP, across all three segments. Adjusted EBITDA margin contracted 170 basis points year-on-year due to the rapid rise in input costs ahead of price realization, along with a tougher count from 2020 due to cost actions taken in the second quarter last year in response to COVID-19. We continue to see rapidly evolving inflation across raw materials and logistics, along with higher wages and benefits as the labor market remained tight, despite the diminishing impact of COVID-related absenteeism. Russ will provide an update on these trends for the second half of the year, along with our updated 2021 outlook. Given the inflationary environment and our expectations for the remainder of the year, we have taken further actions in an effort to maintain a favorable price-cost relationship. Since our last earnings call, we've taken two additional rounds of price increases within our North American residential segment. One was effective late June, and a second just became effective for orders received after August 9th. We believe these price increases will drive a favorable price-cost relationship and return to adjusted EBITDA margin growth later this year, allowing us to still achieve full-year 2021 adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. In July, we completed a $375 million bond issuance at historically low rates to refinance our 2026 notes. This refinancing will result in more than $30 million of interest savings over the next five years and provide us with additional capital and financial flexibility as we invest to support our 2025 Centennial Plan. With respect to business and operational highlights for the quarter, we continue to see strong demand across our residential end markets in both North America and Europe, with early signs of recovery in our commercial end markets as well. This continued strength, coupled with material and labor constraints across our business, has challenged our ability to fully meet customer demand. Our supply chain team continues to identify alternative suppliers as well as material substitutions where possible. To address tight labor markets, we're using initiatives such as referral, sign-on, retention, and perfect attendance bonus programs, in addition to wage and benefit adjustments, to remain competitive in our local markets. In June, we published our 2020 Environmental, Social, and Governance Report, highlighting our ESG achievements and priorities. It also included our first comprehensive third-party verified carbon footprint assessment. I encourage you to visit our website to access the report and learn more about our ongoing efforts to extend a positive influence on the environment, as well as our employees and the communities in which we operate. While the organization remains keenly focused on near-term commitments to service our customers, we continue to look for the future and make investments that support our growth opportunities. Accordingly, I am extremely pleased that we are moving forward with new facilities in both our North American residential and Europe segments. We believe these two facilities will provide the additional capacity needed to better service our customers in the future and to do so more efficiently. Now let me provide you with some more details on these new facilities. In late June, we announced our plan to invest in a new door manufacturing facility in Fort Mill, South Carolina. This facility will assemble interior doors for our North American residential segment and is anticipated to be operational in the second quarter of next year. Given the continued strength and demand, we believe this new capacity is ideally situated from a logistics standpoint to efficiently service high-growth markets in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast. Being a greenfield facility, we also have the benefit of designing the site utilizing mVantage tools along with targeted automation from the start, positioning this operation to be a highly efficient addition to our manufacturing network. In our Europe segment, work is underway on a new facility in Stoke-on-Trent, England. This facility will increase capacity for our high growth and margin accretive exterior door business. Mason and I entered this business in 2014 with the acquisition of DoorStop International, which sells fully finished exterior door systems direct to contractors. In early 2018, we acquired DW3, which includes additional direct-to-contractor entry system offerings, including the widely recognized Solidor brand. Our entry door business has grown in excess of 20% annually as a result of these investments, and the Solidor business in particular will soon become capacity constrained. As that business grew, expansion took place across multiple facilities, This new build to suit facility will afford us the opportunity to consolidate six buildings into one efficient location capable of supporting continued growth. We anticipate production will start in the first quarter of 2022. Both of these locations are great examples of our commitment to invest in the business for growth. This new capacity will help us execute on the first pillar of our doors that do more strategy, provide consistent and reliable supply. It's foundational for all we do, and these investments are designed to accomplish this goal and to help us achieve our 2025 centennial plan. With that, I'll turn the call over to Russ to provide more details on our financials. Russ? Thanks, Howard, and good morning, everyone. Turning to slide seven, I'll provide an overview of our second quarter financial results. we reported net sales of $662 million, up 33% as compared to the second quarter of 2020. The growth was primarily due to a 19% increase in base volumes as we laughed the impact of COVID in the second quarter of last year and benefited from previously announced new retail business in North American Residential. AUP improved 7% year on year with increases across all three segments due to pricing actions. We also benefited 5% from foreign exchange and 2% from higher component sales. Gross profit increased 21% to $164 million on higher volumes and AUP, which were partially offset by the impact of rapidly increasing inflation along with tariffs on raw materials, rising logistics costs, higher manufacturing wages and benefits, and increased investment in the business. As a result, gross margin contracted 250 basis points year-on-year to 24.8%. Selling general and administration expenses were 12.5% of net sales, favorable 220 basis points year-on-year, but up 12% in absolute terms to $83 million. This reflects the absence of cost actions taken in the second quarter last year in response to COVID-19, as well as the impact of wage and benefit inflation and renewed investments in resources necessary to support growth initiatives. Net income was $35 million in the quarter, an increase of 3% from the prior year. Diluted earnings per share were $1.41, up from $1.38 in the second quarter of last year. Adjusted earnings per share increased 49% to $2.23, which excludes charges related to our previously announced restructuring plans, the loss on disposal of our check business, and the impact of a corporate tax rate change in the U.K. This compares to $1.50 per share in the second quarter last year, which also excluded charges related to restructuring and the loss on disposal of our India subsidiary. Adjusted EBITDA increased 20% to $111 million, which, as Howard noted earlier, was a record quarterly adjusted EBITDA for Masonite. As expected, and per our comments on our first quarter earnings call, the timing of inflation in relation to our mitigation actions, as well as the return of expenses absent last year, put a governor on our adjusted EBITDA growth in the second quarter. While price actions more than offset material increases, adjusted EBITDA margin was 16.7%, down 170 basis points from a strong margin level in the prior year quarter. Moving to the adjusted EBITDA bridge on the right side of this page, you can see the significant year-on-year contribution from our strong top-line growth. with the benefits shown here for volume, mix, and price being delivered by roughly equivalent contributions from volume and AUP. We also realized year-on-year favorability of $6 million due to foreign exchange as both the Canadian dollar and British pounds strengthened against the U.S. dollar. Countering these tailwinds was the negative impact of a quickly changing inflationary environment on our cost of goods sold. Material costs dramatically increased and were $31 million unfavorable year on year. Strong demand and sporadic supply chain disruptions also required us to source more material subject to higher tariffs and duties. Coupled with higher logistics expenses to bring raw material into our facilities and move components within our supply chain internally, we experienced material inflation of almost 13%, equivalent to mid-single digits as a percentage of net sales. compared to the second quarter last year. We also incurred $8 million of higher factory-related costs in the quarter due to higher wages and benefits and production inefficiencies in the architectural segment. Distribution costs were also elevated $10 million year on year as a result of freight lane mix as we rebalanced production across our network to best meet customer demand, as well as inflation in logistics and packaging materials. Let's turn to slide eight for our North American residential segment results. Net sales increased 29% from the prior year to $493 million, primarily driven by a 19% increase in base volume. This increase includes the benefit of lapping COVID-related impacts in the second quarter of 2020, as well as continued strength in our retail business, which includes our previously announced new business with Lowe's. AUP contributed an additional 7% to growth in the quarter, driven by favorable price, which was partially offset by a mixed headwind as our exterior door production was constrained due to upstream supply chain disruptions. These disruptions also drove outside inflation in our chemicals basket. As Howard mentioned earlier, we have taken additional pricing actions to help mitigate the inflationary environment. I'll speak about the timing of those actions and their anticipated benefits when I discuss our outlook. Adjusted EBITDA in the North American residential segment was $100 billion in the second quarter, a 10% increase over the same period last year. This too was a record marking the highest quarterly adjusted EBITDA reported for the North American residential segment. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 20.3%, down 360 basis points as material inflation and higher logistics costs in the quarter outpaced mitigation actions. Adjusted EBITDA margin was also impacted by a tougher COP from 2020 due to the absence of COVID-related cost actions and investments in the business for growth, specifically our North American investment plan and capacity expansion. Turning to slide nine in our Europe segment. Net sales increased significantly year-on-year to $88 million, driven by higher base volume as we lapped COVID-related restrictions that resulted in the idling of our UK and Ireland operations for approximately half the prior year quarter. Underlying residential and market demand remained healthy, with increased new housing builds and sustained robust demand in the remodeling market supporting strong growth in both our interior and exterior door businesses. We achieved this strong top line performance despite material and labor availability impacting our Europe segment. AUP also contributed to year-on-year growth due to previously implemented price increases. In response to the current inflationary environment, we have recently taken further pricing actions in Europe as well. To further optimize our portfolio in this segment, we completed the sale of our check business near the end of the second quarter. This business did not have the scale necessary to serve as a platform for growth in Europe, with net sales of approximately $20 million annually and generating only mid-single-digit adjusted EBITDA margins. Adjusted EBITDA was $17 million in the second quarter, up significantly year-on-year as we lapped COVID-related closures from the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA margin was consistent with the first quarter at 18.9%, despite mixed headwinds from the relative strengthening of our interior business. Overall, a strong quarter for our Europe segment. Moving to slide 10 and the architectural segment. Net sales decreased by 11% year-on-year to $76 million. as a 16% decline in base volume was partially offset by a 4% improvement in AUP, driven by price actions. Volumes were impacted by lingering weakness in some of the commercial end markets we serve, while manufacturing constraints, including material and labor availability issues, also impacted output in certain plants. Adjusted EBITDA margin contracted to less than 1%, primarily due to the impacts of lower volumes. Favorable contributions from price were more than offset by inflation in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin was also negatively impacted by a large capital project to upgrade essential equipment at one of our factories. The project was successfully completed, but resulted in extended downtime, and it was a headwind to second quarter financial performance. As discussed last quarter, we have a three-phase optimization plan and are executing against it. We completed two facility closures as part of Phases 1 and 2, and we expect to see the associated cost savings in the second half of 2021. We continue to make progress on Phase 3 and are currently evaluating our flush door capabilities. Our belief is that once this plan is complete, we will be able to take advantage of a commercial and market recovery, which we believe will be early 2022. Slide 11 summarizes our liquidity and cash flow performance for the quarter. Inclusive of unrestricted cash and accounts receivable purchase agreement and our ABL facility, which remains undrawn, our total available liquidity ending the quarter was $591 million. Net debt was $463 million, resulting in a net debt to adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio of 1.1 times. Cash flow from operations was $33 million through the end of the second quarter, down from $103 million in the first six months of 2020. These lower cash flow levels were expected, given our historically low net working capital at the end of 2020, coupled with the natural increases in working capital from rising sales volumes, along with anticipated higher cash taxes and the cash payment of $31 million in June related to the settlement of U.S. class action litigation. Capital expenditures were approximately $29 million in the first six months of 2021. We continue to execute our share repurchase program in the second quarter, purchasing nearly 284,000 shares for approximately $32 million at an average price of $114.28. Our board of directors and management continue to view Masonite shares as an attractive investment opportunity. Accordingly, the board recently approved a new share repurchase program, allowing the company to repurchase up to $250 million of its outstanding common shares. inclusive of approximately $40 million remaining available under the existing share repurchase authorization approved in May 2018. This repurchase program remains an important means for us to return value to shareholders. As Howard mentioned earlier, subsequent to quarter end, we successfully completed a $375 million bond issuance in July. Acting on historically low rates, we entered the market with the objective of fully refinancing $300 million of notes due in 2026. In addition to extending the maturity date to 2030, the coupon rate was significantly reduced from 5.75% to 3.5%. We will record debt extinguishment costs in the third quarter, but this refinancing will result in more than $30 million of interest savings over the next five years and provide an excellent foundational layer in our capital structure. I was pleased with the team's ability to execute on this deal quickly, taking advantage of favorable market conditions. Let's turn to slide 12 to discuss some of the key dynamics we expect to shape Masonite's operational and financial performance in the second half of 2021. Overall, we see three factors driving strong top-line performance for Masonite in the back half of the year. First, we anticipate continued favorable conditions in our residential end markets, both in North America and the UK. U.S. new housing starts remain up significantly year on year, which, when coupled with an existing backlog in the North American residential business and a steadily recovering new housing market in the U.K., should result in healthy demand for our residential products across the balance of the year. Second, we have worked hard to enhance our capacity to support this customer demand. Actions we've taken in the first half of 2021, such as adding shifts and new equipment in certain door assembly and fabrication facilities, are intended to provide incremental capacity for some of our most constrained product offerings. As a result, we expect volumes in our residential businesses will continue to be up year on year in the second half of the year. While select commercial end markets have shown initial signs of improvement, we still anticipate soft volume in the architectural segment through the balance of 2021. Third, as discussed earlier, we have implemented additional pricing actions across our segment to help mitigate inflationary pressures. In our North American residential segment, we expect to benefit from two additional price increases since our first order earnings call. Due to the timing of these price increases, late June and mid-August, coupled with the existing backlog I just mentioned, we would not expect to realize a significant benefit in the third quarter, but should see the full benefit of both increases during the fourth quarter. These price increases, along with pricing actions taken in our Europe and architectural segments, should drive acceleration in AUP growth as we progress through the second half. From a cost perspective, we expect the environment to remain challenging for the rest of this year. We have seen inflation continue to exceed our expectations. As of our last call, we expected material inflation could reach 7% for the full year. Given the further increases we experienced through the second quarter, coupled with our outlook that this headwind will strengthen in the third quarter before moderating, We now expect material inflation will be in the low teens for the full year, inclusive of tariffs and inbound freight. Due to the tight labor market, we are seeing higher year-on-year wage and benefit inflation. In North America, we have seen wage and benefit increases averaging over 5% this year across our hourly employees. The employment incentives Howard noted earlier present an additional cost headwind, but are expected to improve our ability to hire and retain qualified employees. yet we anticipate that labor availability will remain a constraint. Distribution costs also remain elevated as the logistics inflation we see to ship material between our plants also impacts our outbound shipping costs to customers. We also expect that our mix of freight lanes could remain somewhat sub-optimized as we continue to flex production across our manufacturing network to provide the best service levels possible in the current supply chain environment. Our manufacturing and supply chain teams are working incredibly hard and doing an outstanding job under the circumstances to manage through this difficult supply chain environment. Further, we remain confident that the incremental price actions we have taken will allow us to fully offset material and logistics cost headwinds for the full year. With these factors as a backdrop, on slide 13, we provide our updated outlook for the consolidated full year 2021. Based on the continued strength of residential demand and incremental pricing actions, we now expect year-on-year consolidated net sales growth of 17% to 20%, compared to our prior outlook of 12% to 15%. This updated outlook reflects a slight increase in the benefit from foreign exchange, from 2% to 2.5%, due primarily to further strengthening of the Canadian dollar and British pound. Given the challenging cost environment I just outlined, coupled with when we anticipate fully realizing the benefits of our additional price actions, we expect adjusted EBITDA to remain in the range of $435 million to $455 million, unchanged from our prior outlook. With the full benefit of pricing not expected until the fourth quarter, we anticipate additional adjusted EBITDA margin compression until that time. However, we do expect a return to adjusted EBITDA margin expansion in the fourth quarter and for the full year. Our adjusted earnings per share and cash tax expectations remain unchanged as well. We expect adjusted earnings per share in 2021 will be in the range of $8 to $8.60, and cash taxes will be $45 million to $55 million. We believe capital expenditures will now be in the range of $85 million to $100 million for the full year 2021 on increased investments to support growth. We now expect full-year free cash flow of $130 million to $160 million, reduced from our prior outlook to reflect the impact of higher net sales and material costs on our working capital balances and the slightly higher capital expenditures. Now I'll turn the call back to Howard for some closing comments. Thanks, Russ. We are very pleased with the results this quarter, given the challenging operating environment, as we reported record net sales of adjusted EBITDA, both the highest since becoming an NYSE listed company in 2013. While adjusted EBITDA margins were impacted by inflationary headwinds in the quarter, we've taken further pricing actions to help mitigate these impacts. It should provide incremental benefits as we progress through the second half of the year. We are encouraged by the continued strength in the residential end markets and initial signs of recovery in the commercial end markets. This strong demand gives us confidence to continue investing in the business, including larger capital projects to add new capacity. We are proud of the progress made on our ESG journey. We invite you to visit our website's dedicated ESG page to view this report. Lastly, we've updated our 2021 outlook to reflect a strong demand as well as recent pricing actions taken that should allow us to maintain a favorable price-cost relationship for the full year and drive year-on-year adjusted EBITDA margin expansion for 2021. And with that, I'd like to open the call to questions. Operator?
spk00: Thank you. Our first question comes from Josh Chan with Baird. You may proceed with your questions.
spk07: Hi, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions.
spk00: Good morning, Josh.
spk07: Good morning. I guess to start off, maybe could we talk about the cadence of raw material inflation? I guess you posted a $31 million headwind in the quarter, and it sounds like you think that that gets worse before it gets better. But maybe could you talk about the shape of that material headwind that you expect and some color behind that perhaps?
spk06: Yeah, Josh, it's Russ. I'll take that one. What we saw is really across Q2, the inflationary headwinds continued to increase, such that we exited the second quarter at a pretty strong rate of inflationary increase. And that was why in our prepared remarks, I commented that we expected the inflation to be even worse in the third quarter before it moderates somewhat in the fourth quarter. So that curve we see from an inflationary standpoint, again, approximately 13% in the second quarter, getting worse in the third quarter, moderating back to the probably low to mid-teens level in the fourth quarter, such that we see, again, that low teens rate for the full year. That's our current viewpoint.
spk07: Okay, that's helpful. And the idea that it moderates in the fourth quarter, have you started to see some stabilization in sort of the raw material costs, at least on a sequential basis?
spk06: Yeah, I would say generally that's true. The areas that we're focused on most carefully are wood and chemicals. Those are the two baskets where we have seen the most inflation as the quarter progressed in Q2 and where we think there's probably the greatest opportunity for additional inflationary pressure in Q3. But we do expect both of those baskets to moderate somewhat as we get deeper into the year.
spk07: All right, that's great. And then I guess my last question is on some of your internal initiatives. I mean, obviously price is a key component to offset the raws, but could you talk about other things that you're doing in terms of sourcing and substitution and how big of an impact can those mitigation efforts have in the back half?
spk06: Yeah, Josh, it's Russ. Let me just follow that up by saying that our sourcing team, frankly, they've been working their tails off to manage what's been a pretty fluid supply chain environment. We see continued supply chain disruptions. That's no secret. We're seeing that across the industry space generally. And so whereas entering the year, they probably would have expected more of their time and headspace to be devoted to material substitutions, supply chain or supply base modifications. qualifying alternative materials from alternative sources at lower cost. They're now having to devote more of their time to actually managing some of these supply chain disruptions. And we're putting that, frankly, as our priority one to make sure that we can maintain their service levels as best as possible in this current environment. So I would say our outlook does not necessarily reflect as much progress on the sourcing savings side, including finding alternate suppliers that will allow us to avoid some of the tariffs that we've been paying, but supply chain resilience is number one priority right now. Let me just add to that, Josh. This is Howard. We think about servicing our customers first and foremost, and so the supply chain is one aspect, and finding appropriate sources of supply, and labor is the other. So, you know, labor's been difficult this quarter, and we are beginning to see some signs of improvement as some of the states that had federal unemployment benefits have Roll those back. The federal unemployment benefits generally end in September. We expect to see some improvements. But, you know, getting qualified labor and getting materials in our shop to service our customers is our priority.
spk07: That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the color, and good luck on the second half.
spk00: Thanks, Josh. Thanks, Josh. Our next question comes from Michael Rehout with J.P. Morgan. You may proceed with your question. Michael, your line is now live. You may proceed with your question.
spk01: Hi, thanks. Sorry about that. Good morning, everyone. Just to round out the questions around, you know, price and cost here, just to be clear, you know, it seems that, you know, you kind of reiterated your outlook for a favorable or positive price-cost relationship the full year. Just want to make sure, think about it right, that essentially first quarter was positive, second and third quarters negative, and fourth quarter returning to positive. Is that the right way to understand the quarter-by-quarter progression?
spk06: Yeah, Mike, it's Russ. You got that correct. That is essentially the cadence that we see. Some of that's driven by the timing of the incremental price increases that we've taken. As we remarked, one was effective in late July, so orders after, I'm sorry, late June, June 21st, orders after that date. And the third increase with orders effective actually after today. One of the things that puts a bit of a governor on our ability to realize that price is we do have an extended backlog at this point. And so we're not really realizing any price on the June increase until we got to the very end of July, early August. And the August price increase just implemented, we really don't expect to see any benefit until the fourth quarter. So once you get to the fourth quarter, you see the full benefit of both of those price increases late over the top. But in the meantime, again, when you see the increasing inflationary headwind that I commented on exiting Q2 and through Q3, that is what leaves us exposed from a margin perspective in the third quarter loan. Certainly recovering to, we think, healthy margin expansion in the fourth quarter.
spk01: Okay. That's helpful. Thanks for that, Russ. And just, you know, also kind of thinking about the degrees of magnitude here. You mentioned that in the previous question, you expect worse inflation in 3Q combined with not having the full impact of the offsetting price increases. So, you know, from an EBITDA margin perspective, particularly as we think about North American residential, which obviously drives the majority of the bus here on a consolidated basis, Should we be looking for a greater amount of year-over-year margin contraction, 3Q versus 2Q?
spk06: Yeah, but I think that clearly is a risk that we would see even more compression in the third quarter. But again, to my comment a moment ago, a pretty strong snapback in the fourth quarter. Those comments that I gave a moment ago were for the consolidated business, but to your point, Mike, a large single part of that is North American residential, and we would expect that trend to play out in that segment as well.
spk01: Great. One last question, if I could. Just on architectural, you mentioned that you remain on track with your improvement plan, you know, and that, you know, you're expecting some cost savings to flow through in the back half of the year. You know, from a degree of magnitude standpoint as well, you know, you're kind of, you know, a little bit better than break-even, let's say, in the first half of the year. Should we be thinking maybe mid to high single-digit margins, EBITDA margins in the back half? Because I assume that, you know, you're not necessarily at the point where you're getting back to like a low double digit, low mid double digit type of dynamic.
spk06: Yeah, Mike, this is Howard. I think that those assumptions are about right. I think the second half margins are in the sort of same zip code as what we had in the second half of 2020. That'd be our expectation as we start to see some of these improvement projects take hold. And it's, you know, we begin to see some volume return. I mean, it's been really a volume leverage story there that's been really problematic for us. And, you know, we are beginning to see some very early signs of recovery as far as quoting and whatnot. It's not necessarily translating into quarter volume yet, but we would expect through the third and fourth quarter that some of these, you know, mid-teens volume reductions would begin to improve. And I think that's going to be helpful. So I think that margin assumption is reasonably close. Yeah, Mike, it's Russ. One thing that I might just add some perspective on the results in the second quarter is as we commented on, we did see some extended downtime due to some major capital upgrades in one of our plants. We also saw some inventory costs associated with clearing inventory at one of the sites that we recently closed. so you take those two items together that was circa two million dollars was an impact in the quarter so again these investments that we're making to better position that business going forward uh did represent a cost in the quarter if you were to adjust those out i mean clearly that would add a few points to margin in the second quarter alone for the segment great thanks so much that was very helpful appreciate it thanks
spk00: Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you would like to register a question, please press star one. If you are using the speakerphone, please lift your handset before entering your request. Our next question comes from Mike Dahl with RBC Capital Markets. Mike, you may proceed with your question.
spk05: Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Sorry to stick with the cost topic, but um i wanted to understand a couple different things when we're thinking about you know price cost neutral or price cost favorability you know if i look from a dollar standpoint it does look like price covered materials in 2q but obviously if you just cover materials dollar for dollar that's margin dilutive so are you are you telling us that we should be expecting from a dollar standpoint price costs to be unfavorable in the third quarter, or is that just from a margin standpoint? And I guess the second part of that is, obviously, costs have surprised to the upside all year in such a dynamic environment. How have you changed the way that you forecast and incorporate those forecasts into your guidance?
spk06: Yeah, Mike, it's Russ. With respect to the price cost on a dollar basis, yes, you're right. We were clearly favorable in the second quarter. And in the third quarter, taking into account material and logistics, we would expect to be slightly unfavorable. So it really is when we get to the fourth quarter and we see the benefit of both of those price increases, that positions us to well more than offset, not only material costs, but the logistics expense increases that we're seeing as well around the freight costs, et cetera. With respect to the constantly moving bogey here on inflation, the sourcing team has worked really hard to try to project forward what supply lines will look like and where they're going to see inflationary pressures. And at this point, we'd like to think they've got a pretty good bead drawn on what the balance of the year looks like, what that looks like by commodity basket, and how it looks by segment. But we're going to continue monitoring this environment really carefully, and anything that they can do to continue shifting supply, albeit their challenge to spend a lot of time on that right now, that's going to continue to be a tool in the toolkit. But sitting here today, The outlook we've outlined we think is, you know, as good as our visibility would afford us. And it's like anything else. We've had to get better at this, I think, over the last several months because you're right, it was so rapidly changing early that we weren't as far ahead of it as I think we could have been, should have been, and we're better at that now. So I agree with Russ. I think we got a pretty good beat on it. But we've had to have a pretty intense focus on a lot of the indices and the
spk05: know the moving parts because it's it's moving quick okay thanks for that my second question on the um on the capacity expansions in both north america and europe pretty interesting i mean obviously two entirely different stories with those those two um but i i was hoping for a little more detail you know clearly you would have had some sort of internal return analysis that that told you hey this you know, more than exceeds the high watermark in terms of, you know, project ROI. And anything you can share on just once these are operational, how you envision, whether it's changes, how much does this improve your net effective capacity in these categories, and also just, you know, relative margin profile or anything on relative profitability given the yeah these these plants will incorporate some of your um you know some of your newer tools and and automation and such anything you can give us in terms of thoughts around comparisons of what these facilities could produce uh in profitability versus call it just your your average current facility
spk06: Yeah, so let me take a shot at that. I'll start with Europe, and then I'll let Tony talk a little bit about North American Residential and the logic with the Fort Mill plant. But as you know, the European business, we have an interior business, an exterior business. We entered the exterior market in 2014, and that business has been growing really nicely since that time. greater than 20% CAGR in that business. And like with most businesses that grow, you know, you begin to expand. And the Solidware business specifically, which is a direct-to-contractor finished exterior door system business, It's sort of grown up and now comprises six different facilities, five of which are in a residential neighborhood on a campus, if you will, but it's five separate buildings. We're limited by the hours we can work because of noise ordinances. So, for example, we can't work past 10 p.m. any evening. On Saturdays, we can only work 8 to noon. And so we're capping up against our capacity now where the demand is starting to get to a point where we're not going to be able to service it. So that becomes a pretty easy analysis. This new Facility 1, we believe, is going to drive some efficiencies because it's one big facility and not six. separate facilities, but two, is going to allow us the ability to continue to grow that business. And as you know, when we talk about our exterior business in the UK, it's margin accretive. And so this one, we believe, is absolutely the right thing for continued growth of an important margin accretive category. Similar for North America, but I'll let Tony go into some of the analysis there. Yeah, Mike, I think the excitement around the expansion in Fort Mill, South Carolina, is we do believe that the residential market in North America is going to continue to be robust. We think there are some positive tailwinds that will continue for for a good period there. And so, as we looked at our capacity, this was really an opportunity to step that capacity up, primarily in interior doors, and do it in a geographic region, frankly, that's really strong for us and one that's been more capacity constrained. You know, as we opened the Tijuana facility and began to expand that, it allowed for better service proposition in the West. we've seen more tightness of capacity in the east. And so Fort Mill is located very well to service the southeast up through the mid-Atlantic and northeast. And we believe that by opening a new facility, we'll eliminate some of the constraints we've had and some are others. We've owned some of those plants for decades. And frankly, the layout has limited efficiencies and limited some of the things that we could do in terms of operational change. And so the ability to come in and start from scratch in a big square facility in Fort Mill. It's going to give us the advantage of really appropriate and really efficient layouts and, frankly, some new equipment that we're bringing in to help automation in certain aspects of that operation. So very excited about that. It should have an excellent return.
spk05: Okay, thanks. Appreciate that, Tommy and Howard.
spk00: Thanks, Mike. Our next question comes from Jay McCandless with Wedbush. You may proceed with your question.
spk02: Thanks for taking my questions. So it seems like you guys have a high class problem. The demand's there, you're able to raise price, but you've got these three cost headwinds. If you lump labor and transportation, or sorry, you lump logistics and transportation in one bucket, your other input cost, and then managing the labor force. I guess, which one of those three buckets do you feel like you've made the most progress on? And the second question I have is, It's great that you're putting the price increases now. How sticky do you feel like these will be as hopefully some of these inflation, the different inflation buckets hopefully moderate as we move into next year?
spk06: Yeah, good question, Jay. I think that it is a high-class problem. And as I said, we're incredibly proud of the team for how they've performed. I think from a material cost perspective, the supply chain team has been working on alternative suppliers for nearly as long as I've been here. And thankfully, that gave us some optionality. Now, the demand is so strong that we've had to sort of go back to some of the original suppliers. For example, when tariffs and anti-dumping duties became a real thing, we had good options for some of those products in other areas, regions that weren't subject to the same tariffs. Because of demand, we've had to source product from both the alternative supplier that we found and the original supplier. And as a result, our tariffs have increased. So we've made a lot of progress there, and I'm really proud of the team. But inflation is what inflation is, and so obviously, you know, we're eating some of that as well. The HR team has been doing a remarkable job. I mentioned all the different things we're doing, whether it's retention bonuses or perfect attendance bonuses. We've had outsized wage and benefit inflation in order to attract and retain key talent. Despite having, you know, some challenges there, I think that's pretty common. We read sort of headlines in the paper every day. We're doing a pretty doggone good job of keeping people in the factory, so I feel good about that. Logistics is hard. You know, I was just talking to our head of the supply chain earlier today, and we continue to see inflation in container costs. And when you source product from elsewhere, you have to get it here. And You know, it's a supply and demand issue, and there's been a number of things that have happened, you know, over the last several months to drive those costs up. But, you know, we're doing our absolute best to secure containers at, you know, a price that is reasonable. But, again, you kind of take what you can get there right now. So I'd say we have a little less control over the logistics side of things than we do over the material and labor piece.
spk02: And then in terms of the stickiness of the price increases.
spk06: Yeah, Tony, I would say that, you know, we're not alone in seeing that inflation. And so it's certainly been justification for our communication on price. And given the really, really strong demand in the end markets, certainly folks have been understanding of that and wanting more product. So we right now feel very good about what we've done as a strategy around pricing and what that will end up guiding with the target toward being favorable in price-cost.
spk02: Great. Thanks for taking my questions.
spk00: Thanks again. Our next question comes from Trey Grooms with Stevens. You may proceed with your question.
spk03: Hi. Good morning. This is Noah Murkowski on for Trey. So I wanted to dig in a little bit more on the capacity expansion and sort of how you're thinking about that as the year progresses. You know, it sounds like interior doors remains on allocation. any sense of when you'll be able to sort of fix that situation and where you'll have enough product to fully meet the demand, especially in the North America residential.
spk06: Yeah, that's a good question. This is Tony. We continue to work really hard on optimizing output on our existing facilities. Obviously, the two big expansions that we talked about, the one in Fort Mill, South Carolina in the U.S., won't have impact in our overall capacity until next year in the second quarter. So that's a longer-term investment. We talked, Howard mentioned earlier, all the things our HR teams are doing to try to attract and retain talent and the investments we're making there. That's one of the biggest factors that we have is simply having all of the people available in each one of those plants to be able to run at full capacity. That, frankly, has been a challenge, but we're seeing some progress as the government incentives begin to cease and as we've taken different steps and invested more to try to get those people there. Same on the materials play. You know, we haven't seen as many material limitations on interior doors as we have in exterior doors, but there have been some. And so as we manage those, we're seeing that come back. I wish I could give you an exact date on when we'd be able to meet unconstrained demand. I don't know what that's going to be. It's pretty volatile. Demand fluctuates day to day. We're working against all those initiatives in an effort to satisfy the customer. To Howard's point, we make decisions every day. We err on the side of satisfying the customer. In some cases, that creates mix and payload unfavorability in our distribution and logistics as we shift from non-optimal plants in lanes that we normally wouldn't use. That's the commitment we have to try to address the customer's needs.
spk03: Thanks. That's helpful. And then for my follow up, what were the investments from the North American investment plan geared towards in the quarter? And how are you thinking about the cadence of spending for that in the back half of this year and into next year?
spk06: No, still spending in those three buckets we talked about originally when we introduced this plan. First is about consistent and reliable supply, and then it's about product innovation, and then it's about down-channel marketing. And we said we're going to over-index in the first two in the early stages and then ramp up the down-channel marketing later, and I think that that's essentially true of how we're spending the money today. And, you know, we said that that's approximately $200 million over five years, approximately $20 million a year. We under-indexed last year for obvious reasons. We sort of cut spending in 2Q, and so we didn't quite get to that number. So we said there may be a little catch-up this year. But generally, you know, that spending is pretty balanced, you know, quarter to quarter.
spk03: Thanks. I'll leave it there.
spk00: Thanks, Bill. Our next question comes from Stephen Ramsey with Thompson Research Group. You may proceed with your question.
spk08: Hi. Good morning. On Europe, thinking about mix and the dynamics impacting margins, In the second half and in the early next year, will mix be a major impact over that time frame? And does the new plant as it rolls out? Will that change mix in a positive way?
spk06: Yes, Steven, it's Russ. Well, as we talked about before, we do have much stronger margins on the exterior door business side of the UK business than on the interior door side, in part due to the fact that, as Howard mentioned earlier, we're selling fully finished door systems direct to the contractor channel for the entry door business in the UK. And so what we have seen over the last several quarters is as the interior door business, which we sell more through the merchant channel or to the builder channel, as the new housing market has fluctuated in the UK vis-a-vis the remodel channel, which is where we strongly compete on the entry door side, we have seen mixed headwinds or tailwinds respectively. And more recently there's been a bit of a mixed tailwind just because the relative growth of our entry door business has been stronger than our interior door business. Now that recovered somewhat in the second quarter. We did see house build demand come back stronger in the UK and our interior business began to kick up and grow at rates more aligned with the entry door business. Going forward, again, to Howard's point, our focus is on supplying that continued very robust demand on the remodeling market side for exterior doors. And to the extent that we can continue to grow that business, that should be margin accretive to the business longer term. But again, we're not going to be getting that facility up and running and really at full rate until we get well into 2022. But that will be a longer term margin tailwind for the business in the U.K.
spk08: Okay, great. And then thinking about architectural volumes being down now and in the second half, yet the plants are down for restructuring. Is there a way to think maybe about pure demand currently? And as the in-market demand rises over the next several quarters, will the major plant restructurings be done in time to benefit in a greater way from that higher demand?
spk06: Yeah, that's certainly the intent. I think the loss of volume in that segment exposed some inflexibility in our network. And that's why we're addressing this architectural business as we are. We've successfully closed two plants. We're analyzing our flush door capability. And the intent is, as these markets begin to improve, we're in a much better position to service those markets from a cost perspective. We are seeing, you know, the ABI has been positive for the last five months. That's great news. However, there is a bit of a lag, particularly when it comes to doors. You know, we think it's sort of nine to 12 months before that probably translates into door volume. So you can say it's an opportune time to do some of the things we need to do, you know, with some capital equipment. Russ mentioned the capital equipment upgrade that we were successful with but took some more time to install that had an impact on our financials in the quarter. There's going to be a couple more big projects in the back half of the year, which are going to be a bit of a drag, but the time is right to do those because volume is soft.
spk08: Okay, great. Thank you.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from Stanley Elliott with Stiefel. You may proceed with your question.
spk04: Hey, good morning, everyone. Thank you all for squeezing me in. Two quick questions, and I'll lump them together. Can you talk a little bit about the increase in the repurchase authorization, if there's any sort of cadence, anything like that that we should expect? And then curious kind of what you're seeing in the M&A environment, given the cashless you guys are generating. And I'll hang up. Thanks.
spk06: Yeah, thanks for the question, Stanley. I'll take both of those real quickly. With respect to our share repurchase authorization, first and foremost, I would say, As we laid out during our investor day in early April, the three areas that we plan to deploy cash flow across our business are first and foremost, Organic investments inside the business, things around our manufacturing capability, new product launches, in some cases our digital capabilities to better service customers long-term. Those internal investments are top priority. Second priority would be identifying where M&A opportunities for further inorganic growth lie. I'll talk about that more in just a second. And then the third priority is returning cash to shareholders. And there's going to be a little bit of a fulcrum point there with respect to what's available in the M&A market. And at points where there are not opportunities to strategically deploy large amounts of cash there, we certainly want to step back and deploy the share repurchase program. Frankly, at our current valuation levels, we see our stock as a really good investment, and this is an opportunity for us to continue deploying cash back to our shareholders where we don't have strong return projects elsewhere sufficient to use the strong cash flow that we're generating. On the M&A front, as we talked about during the investor day also, we want to widen the lens out a little bit and take a look at assets that will help us drive this innovation story in the whole doors that do more strategy. We have launched into the market now our new powered and connected M-Power door system that we have essentially installed in model homes with one builder and commitment from another builder to launch that into their offering of high-end custom homes. So we think that there's an opportunity to continue driving that type of innovation into the door system, and assets that will allow us to do that are going to be really attractive to us. So we'll continue to monitor the environment. You know, we continue to look actively at assets and nothing specific to talk about, but, you know, obviously we'll report back when we see those opportunities present themselves.
spk04: Thanks, guys. Appreciate it. Best of luck.
spk06: Thank you.
spk00: That's all the time we have today for questions, Mr. Hackes. I'd like to turn the floor back over to you for any closing remarks.
spk06: Thank you, Operator, and thank you for joining us today. We appreciate your interest and continued support, and this concludes our call. Operator, will you please provide replay instructions?
spk00: Thank you for joining Masonite's second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. This conference call has been recorded. The replay may be accessed until August 24th. To access the replay, please dial 877-660-6853 in the US or 201-612-7415 outside of the US. Enter conference ID number 13720364. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Have a great day and thank you for participating.
Disclaimer