This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk15: Welcome to the Enbridge Inc third quarter 2022 financial results conference call. My name is Brent and I will be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session for the investment community. During the question and answer session, if you have a question, please press star one on your touch tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Rebecca Morley, Director, Investor Relations. Rebecca, you may begin.
spk11: Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to the Enbridge Inc. Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. My name is Rebecca Morley, and I recently joined Enbridge as a Director on the Investor Relations team. Joining me this morning are Al Monaco, President and CEO, Vern Yu, Chief Financial Officer, and the heads of each of our business units. Collin Grunding, Liquid Pipelines, Cynthia Hansen, Gas Transmission and Midstream, Michelle Herodant, Gas Distribution and Storage, and Matthew Ackman, Renewable Power and New Energy Technologies. As per usual, this call is being webcast, and I encourage those listening on the phone to follow along the supporting slides. We'll try to keep the call to roughly one hour. And in order to answer as many questions as possible, we'd appreciate you limiting your questions to one plus a single follow-up as necessary. We'll be prioritizing questions from the investment community, so if you are a member of the media, please direct your inquiries to our communications team, who will be happy to respond. As always, our investor relations team will be available following the call for any additional questions. On to slide two, where I will remind you that we'll be referring to forward-looking information in today's presentation and in the Q&A. By its nature, this information contains forecasts, assumptions, and expectations about future outcomes, which are subject to the risks and uncertainties outlined here and discussed fully in our public disclosure filings. We'll also be referring to non-GAAP measures as summarized below. With that, I'll turn it over to Al Monaco.
spk04: Okay. Thanks, Rebecca. Good morning, everyone. I'll start with the third quarter highlights in our business update. Vern will then review the results and the outlook. capital allocation, and the usual ESG update. Before that, a couple of comments on the current energy and economic landscape. That landscape is characterized by volatility we haven't seen for a long time, high inflation and tightening monetary policy, energy supply shortages, and a looming recession. Those challenges appear set to continue through next year. Energy-wise, the situation in Europe has brought security and reliability back into focus, while ensuring we're on track to reduce emissions. The investment required to meet energy demand for both conventional and low-carbon supply is only half of what we need, which has led to sustained high prices. For our part, we've proved through COVID and many times before, our business model is built to weather storms like this. Our premier natural gas, liquids, and renewables businesses are well diversified, and we deliver energy to the best markets at very low cost. Our commercial underpinnings give us resiliency and predictability of cash flows through all market cycles, and our balance sheet is strong. And you've seen again this quarter, we have an increasing inventory of quality organic investments that will drive growth well into the future. So Enbridge is well positioned, not just to withstand volatility, but to grow and thrive in any environment. And Vern is going to expand on this a little bit later. So on to the highlights. In a nutshell, excellent progress on our priorities this quarter. Safety and operations-wise, we performed well, and utilization was high across all systems. That translated to strong Q3 numbers, and we're on track to achieve our full-year guidance. At this point, we expect EBITDA to come in above the midpoint of our guidance range and DCF per share above the middle. On project execution, we have roughly $3.8 billion slated for in-service this year, which drives cash flow in 2023 and beyond. More good news this quarter on organic growth, talking M&A and capital recycling. We secured another $3.8 billion of projects, the lion's share being our T-South expansion in BC. I'll come back to this later. That brings newly secured growth this year to $8 billion, which illustrates the embedded opportunities we've been talking about within our four franchises. We'll do smaller scale M&A where it makes sense. We executed two excellent deals this quarter, totaling half a billion. Lastly, we continue to surface value by monetizing assets at good valuations, over $1.6 billion this quarter. That adds to our financial flexibility, and in the case of the P66 joint venture, we've reduced our G&P exposure, which is now de minimis. To put the business update in context, this slide recaps our two-pronged strategy and the optionality we have in our businesses. Prong one is to continue to invest in conventional businesses. The fundamentals of our core franchises are stronger than ever, especially in the context of energy security, reliability, and affordability concerns. To ensure we're aligned with our emissions reduction goals, we're modernizing our assets, self-powering with renewables, and ensuring new investments have a plan to hit our targets. At the same time, we're ramping up low-carbon investments. As you can see, we're focused on proven low-carbon strategies that leverage our existing assets. Our conventional businesses are each progressing those opportunities on commercial terms that fit our low-risk model. Any way you look at things, low-carbon energy will mean two things to happen, transportation and storage. We have a lot of that. Having pipe in the ground will be valuable in any transition scenario we can see. A great example is CCS, which is a must in meeting our emissions goals, and that presents an excellent growth opportunity for us, along with hydrogen, RNG, and of course, wind and solar. On to the business update. In gas transmission, you've got roughly 10 billion of projects in execution, including our annual modernization program, and recently secured projects. Gulfstream Phase 6 is now in service. We reached a rate settlement on our BC system and a good TETCO customer settlement. We're seeing strong throughput throughout our systems, and we recently recontracted capacity on the southeast supply header at very good rates. In gas distribution, we've got $3.5 billion underway. And we'll have five of the 27 new community expansions done by year-end. Earlier this week, we filed our utility rebasing application that will establish rates through 2020. You can think of this as carrying on under incentive rates. And we sanctioned two new RNG projects in Ontario. Renewables is performing well. We have $2.9 billion in execution, including 10 solar cell power projects. In liquids, mainline volumes recovered nicely in the quarter. We expect good utilization through year-end and 23. On our Wabamon CCS project, we signed our evaluation agreement with the Alberta government, and we expect to drill two wells in 23 to prove out the geology there. And on the Corpus Christi Carbon Hub, we're in discussions with our customers. So let's get into the exciting growth projects in our gas business. First, here's how we see the fundamentals and our opportunity set. Not much doubt that global gas demand will grow given its abundance, security benefits, and lower emissions. We see gas continue to be a critical part of the energy supply mix well into the future. North America's gas advantage will lead to growth in global market share with LNG exports tripling to over 30 BCS by 2040. We're really pleased with how we're situated to capitalize on these fundamentals, so here's what that looks like. Now, there's a lot in this picture here, but it illustrates well the reach of our systems and our growing LNG footprint. Domestically, we see the best markets totaling around 170 million people. We see growing residential, commercial, and industrial load, and gas will be critical to replacing 84 gigawatts of coal. And we're in discussions now with our customers in the U.S. Northeast to develop solutions that address price and reliability concerns, which are only getting worse. And I think the price pressures and reliability issues are really starting to sink in. Another big prize is LNG. We serve four plants on the Gulf Coast, soon to be five, and we make up 20% of U.S. LNG exports through our pipes. We've also secured precedent agreements with two more LNG facilities that are pending FID. That's Rio Grande and Texas LNG, and there could be more after that. If those do go ahead, we could see our LNG export market share rise to 30% or above. Related to that in the Gulf, we're also very focused on upstream expansion opportunities to connect growing Haynesville supply to LNG via Texas Eastern. So think of that as an upstream strategy on our pipes. And of course, we've just landed an investment in wood fiber LNG on the west coast of Canada. In BC, last quarter, we sanctioned a $1.2 billion extension of our TNOR system, that's Aspen Point, and launched a binding open season on T-South. So let me update you on that. The results of the open season were strong and carry long-term volume commitments So we've now sanctioned and are proceeding with a 300 million cubic feet a day expansion, which is comprised of looping and compression. This effectively replaces capacity currently moving volume to the Pacific Northwest, which will be utilized to feed wood fiber energy when it goes into service. Pacific Northwest demand is also expected to grow, so this expansion ensures reliability in the region. Our preliminary capital estimate is up to $3.6 billion. We'll finalize the cost once we've completed environmental and routing work. Importantly, we'll be engaging and listening to stakeholders and communities and seeking their expertise and look to form economic relationships there. The TESOL commercial structure is cost of service and we expect to file a regulatory application in 2024. Continuing with BC, today we also announced a binding open season for a further expansion on TNorth. Given the outlook for Western Canada's supply, we're seeing strong customer interest for more egress for LNG exports and downstream access. So in addition to Aspen Point then, there's now an opportunity to expand TNorth by another 500 million cubic feet a day. This also will include looping and compression at a cost of roughly $1.9 billion with an expected 2028 ISD. Again, this is cost of service model, which generates stable cash flows and good return. The open season will run to January 10th, so we'll see what that reveals and go from there. Now, these BC system expansions that I just went through represent about $7 billion of high-quality organic investment that are right down the middle of the Enbridge fairway. And they really illustrate the power of our strategically positioned system for low-cost egress to growing markets. Moving now to liquids, starting with mainline coal. We're continuing to ship our discussions on a new commercial agreement that works for our customers and Enbridge, so that's positive. Given the importance of the deal to industry and us, it makes sense to take a little bit more time to make a final call on which path we'll proceed on. Is CTS like incentive tolling deal or cost of service? And as a reminder, we've been on incentive tolling now for 25 years and it's worked out well for industry and ourselves. Now, if we can't land on a reasonable deal, then of course we'll proceed with the cost of service application, which is ready to go and updated for the current inflationary environment. From a financial and commercial perspective, either of the two options are acceptable to us, as we said before. In fact, once we land on a commercial framework, we've got several cost-effective expansions that can give customers added egress. We're also accelerating our U.S. Gulf Coast strategy, which builds on last year's anchor investment of the Ingleside Export Facility in Corpus Christi. Good news here, we're seeing an uptick in export volumes out of Ingleside now, with 10 record loading days in October. We've also now sanctioned a 2 million barrel storage expansion at Ingleside, which allows us to track more export barrels to the terminal, and it's shovel-ready. We've increased our ownership in two key Permian pipelines serving the region and Ingleside, being Gray Oak and Cactus II. The increase in GRAIL came from our new P-66 joint venture, which I'll come back to, and we acquired another 10% of Cactus II, so that brings us to 30% with planes. Both deals bolster our U.S. Gulf Coast position and are financially accrued. Now to renewables. Just like natural gas, it's clear that renewables will be a bigger part of the global energy supply mix. Our European offshore wind business is growing nicely, and we've got strong commercial and execution teams in place and great partners. In fact, we've got the St. Nazaire project coming on later this month with First Power. But there's another big opportunity to accelerate our North American business, driven by a host of factors, including renewables targets and policy actions we've seen lately. Our North American strategy has evolved quite a bit on a couple of fronts. from primarily acquiring late-stage projects in years past to now leveraging our own assets, land positions, and load. And second, capitalizing on our development, construction, and operating experience built over the last 20 years in renewables. The acquisition of tri-global energy, though, brings our capabilities and strategy to yet another level. The tri-global team fills in what I call the front end of our renewables value chain, and gives us extensive origination capability, being resource assessment, site prospecting, land and environment, and grid interconnection. TGE brings a great development track record in a variety of markets, having monetized 6 gigawatts for 24 projects. The TGE front end is highly synergistic with our commercial, EPC, and operating capabilities. What we really like is that TGE allows us to quickly exploit our own lands and existing development opportunities. The deal also comes with a contracted revenue stream on monetized projects, so good early cash flows. And the big prize is three gigawatts in late stage development projects slated for in-service between 2024 and 28. And many of those overlap with our existing operations. Permitting and environmental reviews on those is advanced and in the interconnection queue, which is a big advantage given the time it takes to get through grid connection in today's market. Those development projects alone could drive over $3 billion of investment. That triples our North American near-term development portfolio, and there's even a larger early-stage backlog. So the tri-global deal drives outside value for us. It not only accelerates growth in our renewables business, but it moves the overall Enbridge growth needle. To put that in perspective, this slide shows the size and diversity of our renewables business today. We've got 47 facilities in operation or construction across four countries in North America and Europe. We've built a solid business here, generating close to 6 gigawatts of gross capacity. We have fully resourced development teams in North America and Europe. With a TGE acquisition, our global development portfolio has more than doubled now to roughly 7 gigawatts, with even more coming behind that. Before I turn it over to Vern, I'll speak to how we're keeping our eye on surfacing value from our assets and increasing financial flexibility. Over the last five years, we've recycled $11 billion of capital at good valuations while further strengthening our low-risk models. Our P66 joint venture is a great example, providing a trifecta of benefits. One, we reduced our exposure to DCP. This is a well-managed GMP business, but not fully aligned with our business model. Two, we increased our ownership in and became operator of GRAIL, which is a key element of our Permian egress and U.S. Gulf Coast export strategies. And three, the deal generated $600 million in equity to redeploy within our capital allocation framework. An equally important transaction is our regional oil sands deal with AII. This is a real gem as it establishes a solid economic partnership with 23 indigenous groups in Alberta. You can see the dots on the map here show the breadth of participation of Indigenous communities along the entire rights-of-way. This corridor is highly strategic to our customers and Enbridge, so this deal demonstrates the importance we place on alignment with First Nations in Métis. Part of that is gaining partners with in-depth knowledge of the land, water, and environment, which we place a high value on. The deal also releases over a billion in equity at attractive valuation, again, to redeploy to other opportunities. In the bigger picture, we think this is an ideal model for how energy infrastructure will be developed and owned in the future, a model that fully aligns safety, environmental, and economic interests with indigenous groups, and one that we hope will be applied across our asset base on both sides of the border. And now we'll return. Thanks, Al. Good morning, everyone. Before we review this quarter's results, I'd like to follow up on Al's comments regarding the uniquely challenging macroeconomic conditions we are facing. The financial markets have been very volatile. Inflation is driving interest rates up and weakening the Canadian dollar. In addition, society's climate change ambitions and the war in Ukraine are driving up energy prices, creating challenges for households globally. Enbridge is well positioned to navigate through these risks, and I'll cover that off now. Typically with the recession, you see demand destruction, but we are continuing to see strong energy fundamentals with tight supply and demand dynamics. Supply-wise, we expect further tightening given the recent OPEC Plus production cuts, the ban on Russian oil, and a wind down of SPR releases. Demand wise, Enbridge has connected the best demand for markets for both crude oil and natural gas. In addition, we have strong commercial underpinnings that drive predictable cash flow and global energy security concerns are leading to more investment opportunities for us. Inflation has resulted in the most significant monetary policy tightening that we've seen in the last 40 years. but we're still in pretty good shape here. We have built-in inflation protection for about 80% of our EBITDA, with toll escalators or the ability to capture higher cost increases through rate filings. On interest rates, we have about 90% of our debt in fixed rates. Rising rates are a headwind to our floating rate debt program. We're actively managing this risk with our hedging program. The energy transition is creating a lot of exciting growth opportunities, and the recently announced IRA is providing a real catalyst for low carbon investments. Finally, we're well positioned to leverage our existing infrastructure to transport more North American energy to global markets. Let's go review the quarter. Our third quarter results were up notably over 2021. with strong operational performance across all of our businesses. We're now seeing the full benefit of the $14 billion of capital that we brought into service last year. In liquids, the mainline moved over 2.9 million barrels today. This is in line with our expectations following the completion of customer remains in Q2. Gas transmission utilization was high, and we just continue to see growth driven from our 2021 capital investments, such as the $1.4 billion expansion of our BC pipeline system. In addition, we've begun recognizing higher rates on Texas Eastern with our unopposed settlement that we reached with our shippers this quarter. The utility continues to perform as expected, with summer gas used lower than normal due to seasonality. Strong wind resources and high energy prices in Europe, where we have a small amount of spot exposure, have made a positive contribution to our renewables business. Energy services remain below expectations due to narrow basis differentials and price backwardation. Finally, financing costs are up as a result of rising interest rates. Benchmark rates have risen almost 4% at the beginning of this year. Q3 was a very strong quarter, and the business continues to operate well. Let's move to our full-year financial outlook. As we head into the end of the year, we expect to come in at the top half of our EBITDA guidance range and just above the midpoint of the DCF per share guidance. Our systems have been highly utilized in 2022, and we expect that to continue for the rest of the year. Mainline volumes strengthened in Q3, and we are on track to meet our 2022 volume outlook of 2.95 million barrels per day. Timing of the maintenance capital should provide about a $100 million tailwind this year, and we expect that work to slide into next year. The utility is tracking the guidance and the renewable business is tracking to slightly above guidance on good wind resource and higher European power pressures. From a financial perspective, the US dollar strengthening has provided a slight tailwind. In contrast, we expect energy services to remain a headwind for the balance of the year. Additionally, we're seeing some pressure from higher power costs driven by both higher throughputs and higher power prices. We'll provide our 2023 guidance later this month, but I'll provide a brief overview on how that's shaping up now. We expect the business to remain strong in 2023, and the capital we've deployed this year will drive EBITDA growth. We'll benefit from customer growth and higher rates of utilities. Our capital program within gas transmission at EBITDA will have the full-year benefit from the recent Texas Eastern rate settlement. Energy services should improve in 2023, as we'll see a number of our legacy contracts expire. A stronger U.S. dollar is providing an opportunity for us to layer on additional hedges for 2023 and beyond at very attractive rates. And as we've already mentioned, we'll continue to see higher power prices next year. Interest rate wise, about 10% of our debt next year is subject to floating rates. Given today's inflationary environment, it makes sense for us to be at the lower end of our 10 to 25% floating rate debt range. And we're actively managing our residual floating rate exposure. Interest rates have been a headwind this year, and we expect that to continue next year. We're also expecting some pressure in cash taxes from legislative changes in Canada and the US. At this point, we're waiting on clarity on certain aspects of the alternative minimum tax in the US, so we don't want to go into a great deal of detail on that now. Our initial assessment is that it's purely a timing issue, as we expect to pay less cash taxes in the future as a result of this. And overall, we expect this to be NPV neutral over the decade. Overall, we believe we're in a strong position to navigate a challenging macroeconomic environment and deliver continued growth to our shareholders. Let's move over to the Secured Capital Program. Today, our Secured Capital Program sits at just over $17 billion. We have almost $4 billion of capital entering service this year, which will drive cash flow growth in 2023 and beyond. As Al mentioned in his remarks, we've grown our backlog by adding a number of exciting new projects to the secured bucket this quarter. These new capital requirements fit well within our self-funded model where we live within our means. Going forward, under our self-funded model, We still have ample investment capacity available for further organic growth, tuck-in M&A, debt repayment, or even share buybacks. Now let me remind you how we approach capital allocation. Our priorities here remain unchanged. A strong balance sheet is still job-like. We have continued to recycle capital into new opportunities to the tune of $11 billion since 2018, and $2.8 billion since the middle of last year. We continue to return capital to shareholders in the form of the dividend, where we paid $7 billion this year, and we've used $150 million of our approved $1.5 billion in our share buyback program. We have sanctioned $8 billion in new organic growth capital this year, and our secure capital program now sits at $17 billion. All of these opportunities have met our low-risk business model, exceeded our risk-adjusted hurdle rates, have a strong strategic fit, and align with our mission reduction goals. As always, we'll continue to evaluate opportunities to selectively recycle capital and further bolster our financial flexibilities. So I'm now going to finish up with our quarterly ESG update. Our newly created regional oil sands partnership is a win-win transaction for both us and the 23 Indigenous communities along that right of way. Our relationships with the Indigenous communities along all of our right of ways is something that I've always been very proud of. And we plan to continue to be a leader in Indigenous engagement Indigenous economic participation and reconciliation. We released our Indigenous Reconciliation Action Plan in September, which articulates and tracks our progress against our commitments. The plan built on our success we've had working with communities through the construction of Line 3 and the East West High Line, which entered into service earlier this year. We're also very excited about the Guam and Carbon Hub, and we see further opportunities to develop our economic partnership across our entire asset footprint. Our commitment to the communities where we live and where we work will always be a huge part of our success. With that, I'll turn it back to Alan. Okay, thanks Vern. As you know, I'll be retiring as CEO at the end of the year, and Greg Ebel will take over leadership on Jan. Just for background, I informed the board at the beginning of this year that I may wish to retire from Enbridge, which kicked off a nine-month-long process to identify the next CEO. Since the announcement, Greg and I and the management team have implemented a transition plan to ensure a smooth changeover and maintain momentum and consistency throughout And that's well underway. As usual, we'll deliver 2023 guidance at the end of November and speak to our dividend so the timing there is normal. And then we'll follow that with Enbridge Day on March 1 and March 2, so after the Q4 results, where Greg and the team will lay out management's priorities and outlook. Please save the dates and join in either Toronto or New York. Over my time at Enbridge, the last 11 as CEO, I'm proud of what our team has accomplished, but I believe the best is yet to come. I've been honored to lead Enbridge and I'm confident that Greg and the management team will continue to grow the business well into the future. Before we open it to questions, let me close like we always do with a few takeaways. The business is well positioned and our low risk model provides resilience in all market cycles. This downturn is a great example of that, as we continue to deliver strong results and execute our strategies. The last several months have seen significant volatility in global energy markets. I think it's really proven that our two-pronged strategy to focus on both conventional and low-carbon investments is the right one. As very noted, our capital allocation priorities are unchanged and will continue to be disciplined, putting capital to work. With that, I thank you for continuing support of our management team, Enbridge, and especially our highly skilled professional and very dedicated workforce. We'll now open the call to questions, and the team is here with me to respond.
spk15: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answers. If you have a question, please press star 1 on your touchtone phone. If you wish to be removed from the queue, again, press star 1. If you are using a speakerphone, you may need to pick up the handset first before pressing the numbers. Once again, if you have a question, please press star 1 on your touch-tone phone. Your first question is from the line of Robert Kwan with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk07: Good morning. If I can start on the main line. So at a minimum, we've seen an increase in the cost of capital parameters, which on a political basis is putting upward pressure on tolls. So I'm just wondering, you know, if it's that or just something else, what's transpired since August that's made you more optimistic of a settlement? And have there been any changes in the provision that you've been booking on the main line?
spk04: Okay. I'll start, then Colin can add. No changes in the provision. Robert, of course, we look at that provision continually, and our assessment is that no change is required at this time. I think maybe rather than phrasing it as what's happened since August, I think we continue to talk, and we've got our pencils up rather than down, which is good. Both sides, I think, are working hard. I think it's really just a matter of finding a deal that works for both if that can happen, which, as you've heard us say before, we prefer to continue on and try to arrange a deal here rather than file a cost of service. But that option is always there. As you point out, there's been an inflationary environment since around August, I guess. And so that's going to be incorporated into our filing if we need it. And so that's sort of where we are. Colin, if you want to add anything to that? I think you mostly got it out. I would amplify, Robert, your point about the extra time here, and maybe it's not extra relative to historic negotiation processes that often take about a year. But the extra time here I think will allow us to capture, if you like, the various rate-making parameters inherent in an inflationary environment, interest rates, taxes, indexation mechanisms, et cetera. So I think what I would say is either path will contain an appropriate modern set of rate-making parameters that reflect the macroenvironment.
spk07: That's great. And if I can ask and finish on a capital allocation-related question, you've got your excess cash flow, and it's allowed you to pick up some assets here and there, modest-sized deals to bolt on that you feel is accretive to the strategy and your growth. So just if you think – If market weakness is to persist and valuations moderate, do you see that being a greater part of the capital allocation strategy? And then how do you frame that against another thing, just if we have market weakness notwithstanding the markets today? If you've got a lower share price, how do you frame that against buyback being more attractive?
spk04: Do you want to comment, Vern? Sure. Thanks, Robert. I think as we talked about, job one is always the balance sheet. So having the flexibility to use the balance sheet for opportunistic opportunities is always the most important thing for us. And you rightly pointed out that we have been opportunistic in looking at certain assets where we can acquire them at very attractive valuations. I think what we're seeing, though, is that there is, very strong fundamentals for energy, very strong fundamentals particularly for exports of North American energy to global markets. So we're weighing some good opportunities and some very strong organic growth opportunities against M&A transactions on a smaller scale. and, of course, against being able to pay down some debt in the higher interest rate environment. So from my perspective, we see some great opportunities across the whole capital allocation spectrum, and it's great to have the optionality to pick and choose which one of these levers we pull. Yeah, you know, Robert, with a strong balance sheet to start with, like Bernie said, and you add on the fact that free cash flow is going to be growing, And don't forget, we've obviously demonstrated some opportunities to recycle capital. So you've got a lot of cash to work with there. And then finding and deciding between those opportunities that Vern's talking about. I mean, obviously, we've executed on some very large organic opportunities that are right down the middle of the fairway, as I said. The M&A opportunities and the tuck-in opportunities. variety is certainly an opportunity. And then, as you're pointing out too, there's other options around share buybacks, particularly at this valuation, you know, could make more sense. So I think it's a whole plethora of opportunity here, given that we have a very good outlook for free cash and the ability to recycle more capital.
spk07: That's great. Appreciate the answers. And Al, all the best in retirement.
spk05: Thank you.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Jeremy Tonette with JP Morgan. Your line is open.
spk16: Hi, good morning. Hi, Jeremy. I would just want to start with the CEO transition. Congratulations on retirement there after a successful career, Ember Chair. And just wondering how we should think about the process at this point. Should we expect any changes in strategy that you can point to at this point or might be open for revisiting? We're just curious We didn't see, I guess, some of the forward DCF CAGR language in the slides that we did in the past, and so just curious if we should be looking for any changes on future strategies.
spk04: Well, okay, maybe on the last part first, then I'll get back to strategy. So, first of all, you know, there's no change in our outlook. We feel very comfortable with the growth in the business going forward. As we mentioned, and Vern covered as well, 23 guidance is coming into this month. And then, of course, we'll talk about the medium-term outlook at Enbridge Day when Greg has a chance to lay out the priorities for and the management team will be there as well, of course. But the business is performing very well. In fact, as Vern pointed out, next year looks very strong, and we don't expect any real change in our outlook. As to strategy, one thing to keep in mind here is that Greg has been part of the board and chairing for, I guess, five or six years now. And at Enbridge, just to take you back a little bit, we engage heavily with our board on strategy. In fact, we update that every quarter and talk about where the business is going and what we're seeing fundamentally. So, you know, we're essentially very close with the board in terms of where we're headed as a company and our strategy and our priorities. So I don't expect any changes, and I certainly heard him say that through the transition process several times when engaging with management and our employees here. So that's how I see it, Jeremy.
spk16: Got it. That's great to hear. Just one to talk about, I guess, the crude oil export strategy, if I could. It seems like Rayo feeds into that quite nicely in built-in synergies on the platform. And, you know, I noticed in the slides, I see spot on the slides as well, is that an area where you'd have interest, or do you see other organic or inorganic opportunities to expand on the crude oil export side of the Gulf Coast?
spk04: Okay, well, maybe Colin can speak to that. He's close to it. Yeah, hey, good morning, Jeremy. Thanks for the question. Yeah, we're pretty excited about this strategy. We've been talking about it for a few years. I think it's really starting to come into focus now. Our puzzle pieces are coming together. We've been patient, as you know. And there's two elements to it. One is on the heavy strategy, which would be probably down the Flanagan Seaway into the Gulf region, and that's where SPOT could come into play, and we're still looking to develop our EHOT Houston terminal there to provide a terminus for heavy Canadian and maybe a liquid pricing point, which would be nice. And then on the light oil side, which is more so a straight shot south from the Permian, We've got two interests in two flagship pipelines, Grey Oak and now a 30% interest in Cactus 2. So that's all integrated. It's all light oil. We've got a value chain there. We're going to be operating Grey Oak in Q2 of next year. We're excited about both strategies. We've been big bulls on export. Al mentioned some record loadings at Ingleside here lately. So there's a number of ways to win.
spk05: on the export strategy.
spk16: Got it. That's helpful. I'll leave it there. Thanks. Thanks, Jeremy.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Rob Hope with Scotiabank. Your line is open.
spk02: Good morning, everyone. Maybe a follow-up question on the LNG strategy. You know, we've seen you talk about the numerous opportunities to feed the U.S. Gulf Coast. But when you think about getting supplies down into that region, how does your network potentially – how could your network potentially be expanded for Texas Eastern to further move additional volumes down to the Gulf Coast? And what constraints do you see there?
spk04: Okay. Well, I'll start off, Robert. And then I think Cynthia may want to add on. You know, if you just visualize Texas Eastern, which is essentially a massive header system on the Gulf Coast, which is the reason why we've been able to position so well with LNG exports, you know, I think the reality is, and sometimes people forget, is gas has got to come from somewhere. And certainly, you know, the Hainesville is increasing, and we're a natural player there just given our position there. geographically, but also from a cost perspective. So a very cost-effective way to get those volumes into LNG areas further south into the Gulf. There's opportunities as well to move volumes south from the Marcellus, given our position there. And there's also opportunities, frankly, to move more volumes into Florida. So you've got this ideally positioned header system that's very low in cost, that's ideally positioned to get supply. So, this is what I was referring to when I mentioned the upstream part of our strategy related to LNG. So, I think that's the high to top level. I'm sure Cynthia may want to add to something here.
spk13: Thanks, Rob, and thanks, Al. I would just build on what Al said by reminding everyone that we did go out and have that exploratory open season on the TECCO system for Louisiana area. And we've had some great inbound interest from the customers that we're working through. So we hope to be in a position over the next couple of quarters to really come out with a project that helps support that.
spk02: Thanks for that. And then as a follow-up question, More broadly, in an inflationary environment and one where we've seen interest rates move up, has that altered the commercial framework or how you're looking at new capital investments to ensure that risk and return are properly figured out?
spk05: Okay. Bono Burns, do you want to speak to that?
spk04: Well, as you see inflation and interest rates go up, Obviously, our low-risk commercial model is designed to take that into account. So generally, with new investment opportunities, we look for cost recovery on pretty much everything that we are exposed to. And then as rates go up, obviously, that impacts the underlying risk-free rate, and that causes our hurdle rates to go up. So all in all, I think it's just raises the bar on some of these projects we're looking at.
spk02: Thank you. And I guess finally, Al, congratulations on all that you've accomplished and all the best in the next endeavor. Thanks, Rob.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Teresa Chen with Barclays. Your line is open.
spk00: Morning. Congratulations, Al, on your pending retirement and to Craig on the new role. So I wanted to ask about the utilization on mainline for your comments about good utilization through year-end and 2023. And in light of TMX coming online, how much volume do you think, you know, could move off your system following the in-service date of that project? And how long do you think it would take to recover to full utilization as you look at your producer plans, your customers' plans on a base case? And then within this development, I guess, you know, one wrinkle is that just given the large NAFTA cut inherent in WCS and elevated NAFTA inventories in Asia, which would be the natural destination for many of these barrels off of that pipe, and coupled with ongoing pet chem demand weakness and looming global recession for your earlier comments, Al, wouldn't the at least near to medium term natural home for a WCS barrel as Chemex comes along the line Wouldn't that be the U.S. Gulf Coast anyway, where we'd have some of the most complex and flexible refining facilities, which should result in continued strong utilization of mainline?
spk04: Yeah, I think you got it, Teresa, on that last point. So maybe Colin and I should address that one. Yeah, I just want to agree with what you said, basically, Teresa. So utilization right now is basically full, especially Q3, Q4. We're seasonally more full or or full with typically a Q2. Yeah, I think your question was more kind of year by year and further up. So we're full now. We should be pretty much full again in 23, and then depending on when TMX comes into service. And by the way, we are respecting public in-service dates espoused by TMX, and we've always built our plans around that. So we're expecting it. So for a 90%, 95% utilization now through 23, we expect to, unlike other, I think all other egress competing alternatives, we'll see a small drop probably proportionally across the board. We'll probably lose circa 10 percentage points for a few years. And though we do see modest growth in the basin over time, and that should refill all egress options over the ensuing few years. And for the reasons you know, I think the main line will see a useful future targeted down to our Pad 2 and Pad 3 markets, which have that strong pull and those global markets.
spk05: relevant refineries. So, generally agree with what you're saying. Thank you. Thanks, Teresa.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Robert Kettelier with CIBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk01: Hey, good morning and congratulations all on your retirement here and specifically for staying as active as the company has been in the last little while. And In particular, I wanted to follow up on that on the current M&A environment. We've seen a lot of activity here. So I'm curious if this has been a bulge or if you expect opportunities to continue at this rate. And where are you finding the best opportunities to fit your strategy, both on a tuck-in acquisition point of view as well from a capital recycling point of view?
spk04: Yeah, well, you know, I think broadly speaking, Robert, the market looks pretty good. I mean, the transactions that we've done, mind you, we've been pretty, I guess, selective in what we're looking at. We found to be, you know, reasonably well-priced. You know, if you start back from Ningleside, and then we sort of popped in with TGE and a couple of others here recently, Cactus, They've begun at reasonable valuations. I think the market's pretty reasonable at this time, and we'll pick off those opportunities as we see them, where they fit our strategy, and specifically where we can build out the business. And again, TG is a good example of, as I said earlier, sort of an outsized impact. So we're seeing them across the businesses. gas transmission, liquids, and, of course, renewables. So I think it's just a positive environment for that, let's call it, single, doubles, maybe even triples in the next two, three years. That's how we're looking at it. I don't know. Vern, do you want to add anything to that? I think you've covered it all, Val. I think having the balance sheet capacity is giving us more opportunities than we've seen in a long time.
spk05: So we're very happy to be in this free cash flow positive position.
spk01: Okay. And my follow-up here has to do with the renewables you've obviously added to the North American onshore with Tri-Global. And I just wonder what your current thinking is on the value in expanding to other markets, both onshore and offshore. Sure.
spk03: Okay. Well, maybe, Matthew, you can chime in on that one, please.
spk10: Sure. Hi, Robert. Thanks for the question. Right now, we feel we're really well positioned across all our markets with organic growth opportunities. As you know, you followed us closely in the offshore in Europe. We have several gigawatts of potential development there, some underway, a bunch under construction. We really like those markets, and We'll keep building those out. Western Europe focused long-term contracts with visible PPAs. In North America now, we really like our position with TGE. We like the portfolio. There's several gigawatts of optionality there that adds to what we already had there, which was over a gigawatt. So we'll optimize that in terms of you know, cherry picking the best projects to do and to do in terms of timing. So, you know, we'll maximize our risk adjusted returns there and maintain capital discipline. So we don't, you know, we've got tons of opportunities when you look at both markets and we're really well positioned both in offshore Europe and in North America. So I think we'll just build those out and maintain our discipline. We don't really see the need to enter any other markets from there right now.
spk04: You know, Robert, we get invited to a lot of stuff and we see a lot of opportunities globally. And so, you know, as Matthew said, I think we're pretty happy with where we are in Europe, given all we have going on there. We get a lot of opportunities while U.S. Northeast offshore, which, as you've heard us say before, has been just too frothy and uncertain with respect to timing the cash flow on those projects. So, Again, we've got so much going on onshore North America and offshore Europe that we've got a long runway here of development opportunity to keep us going for quite a while.
spk05: Okay. Thanks, everybody. Thanks. Thanks, Robert.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Brian Reynolds with UBS. Your line is open.
spk06: Hi. Good morning, everyone. maybe to talk about the future of liquids expansions and the acquisition of Tri-Global. Can you just talk about, you know, how you see this acquisition as complementary and maybe essential to the liquids expansion? I'm curious if you could provide any commentary on how shippers are looking, you know, at potential tolling arrangement and how they receive the deal. Thanks.
spk04: Okay. Sorry, I think you're talking about Tri-Global, the first part of that. Yes. Well, yeah, I think I referred to it in my remarks. You know, we have pretty darn good capability, I would say, when it comes to commercial arrangements, construction, operation of renewables. And we've built that up over a good 20 years here, 20 years plus, actually. I think what we were missing is what I refer to as the front end and origination. So, you know, in this business, in renewables, a lot of work is required in prospecting, identifying the right wind resources, and critically figuring out how to get on the transmission grids. And that involves a very significant process. So I think that's really the fill-in that this provides for us. And I think now we legitimately have a full value chain of capability. We're excited about it, actually. And as I said earlier, having this tri-global team actually accelerates what we already have in terms of development opportunities. As Matthew said, we've got on our own land, certainly solar self-power. Those are all opportunities where this team now can help move that quicker, and that's the big part of it. If there was another part of your question, maybe you could just repeat it.
spk06: I guess just ultimately how the shippers are ultimately doing it in the greater context of, you know, potential mainline, you know, totally infringement.
spk04: Okay, so you're talking about renewables being solar cell power and how it relates to the mainline. I think that's your question.
spk05: Yes, yes, thanks. Great. Hey, Brian, Colin, yeah, thanks for that question.
spk04: And we are mindful that we're looking to get our own emissions down, right, as part of our ESG pledges. And I think as Al mentioned, we've got about 10 self-solar projects in flight right now.
spk05: Many of them will be on the liquids system. We're a major power draw in jurisdictions we operate.
spk04: If we can self-power, we can free that power up for other uses, and we can also uh, green it up. Um, so, uh, we're prepared pretty closely with, with Matthew's power business to see if we can accelerate that further.
spk05: It's our intent. And, uh, it also, you know, manages the economic exposure as well.
spk04: So it's, uh, it's kind of a two for that way for us. You know, Brian, you know, these days in this environment, um, it's not just mainline customers. I think all of our customers, whether it's upstream of us or downstream of us, they're looking for service providers that are very much focused on ESG and emissions being a big part of it. So I think in today's environment, it's almost table stakes that you have to focus on reducing emissions, whether you're in the midstream or upstream or downstream part of the value chain. So they're looking to us to make sure we're well advanced on reducing emissions. And that's going to be critical for all energy providers going forward.
spk06: Great. Great. Thanks. And just as one follow-up, you know, curious if you could just talk about how you view the ultimate, you know, ownership of BCP at the time, you know, in your prepared remarks you talked about. you know, the appetite for a little bit less commodity exposure. And just given the evolving NGL strategy out of Corpus, just curious if there are any opportunities within GCP's asset base that could ultimately be exchanged for that ultimately less commodity exposure. Thanks.
spk04: Yeah. Well, you know, to be honest, before we did the joint venture with P66, it was a pretty small component, GMP component of our business. And with this, you know, With this joint venture, it actually is even lower. And that's why I refer to it being pretty much de minimis in terms of commodity exposure. So I don't see the need to make any change here going forward. I think we've got it pretty much where we want it. And I don't think it's a good idea to speculate on what assets might be workable into the U.S. Gulf Coast. I think it's a good point that you raised, Brian, but nothing on the horizon immediately on that front.
spk06: Fair enough, appreciate the call and enjoy the rest of your morning. Okay, thanks, Brian.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Ben Sam with BMO. Your line is open.
spk09: Hey, thanks, good morning. On the renewables side with the Inflation Reduction Act, isn't the outlook in the U.S. renewables better than the development pipeline you have in Europe?
spk03: Well, I know, Matthew, do you want to chime in on that first?
spk10: Sure. Yeah. Ben, we really, it's a really good insight. You know, we really, we feel we timed this one really well on the TGE with the Inflation Reduction Act coming into play and, you know, hopefully just makes those projects even more economic. So we really like the North American outlook right now. We really like the optionality, though. And I think that's, that's key is, you know, we're going to, like I said before, in response to a prior question, we have so much on the go now, both, you know, in Western Europe and North America, we can really pick and choose the best projects. As you know, capital discipline and our risk profile are all always front and center at Enbridge. And so having all these opportunities and this portfolio just gives us, you know, great optionality. But yeah, I think you're right. I mean, we love our developments in Europe, but Right now, the U.S. looks very attractive. And so with this three gigawatts that we got with TGE combined with we had over a gigawatt plus a front of meter internally, those projects should get great tailwinds. And the customer demand is fabulous right now and, you know, very buoyant. So we like North America a lot, and we like the optionality we have.
spk04: I think, Ben, you know, the – Maybe to add some balance to it as well, and I think Matthew pointed this out, it gives us a lot of options to choose the best projects. And, you know, we shouldn't discount Europe either. I mean, typically they've had very strong PPA structures. They have a very smooth process for connecting to grids, especially from offshore locations. Regulatory processes are pretty smooth as well. So anyway, it's good to have choice in two really good markets.
spk09: Okay, great. And then my second question, the fall update for McCain government yesterday, and maybe some of it's expected, maybe some of it isn't. What are your initial thoughts on implications in your Canadian business and outlook?
spk04: Yes. You know, at a high level, it appears that this is intended and I think it would do that, close the gap to the U.S. IRA. And I think that's important because I think it's recognized from what I read last night that, you know, you've got to be competitive. And I think, as I said, this will try to close the gap so that, you know, we get our share in Canada of investment dollars. I think, broadly speaking, that the tax credits for wind and solar support our business here in Canada. There's some references to financial insurance on carbon pricing. which I think is going to be very helpful to carbon capture proponents in Canada. And as I said earlier in my remarks, that's a big opportunity. You've got investment tax credits for hydrogen. And by the way, it appears that's for both green and blue. We'll have to get more into the details there. And then, of course, there's Indigenous benefits sharing on major projects. So my read of this early on is, it'll be attractive for our business here, both in terms of Canada attracting capital, but also for us as specific to our business generally.
spk09: Okay, that's excellent, and all the best to retirement now.
spk03: Thanks, Ben.
spk15: Your next question is from the line of Linda Ezergalis with TD Securities. Your line is open.
spk12: Thank you, and I want to add my congratulations very sincerely, Al, to you.
spk05: Thank you.
spk12: So maybe you can help us understand and delineate a little bit more about the mainline process beyond the end of the next year. So basically, there's two paths that I understand will likely be taken. If you were to go down the settlement path, I assume it would be a fairly quick process, but maybe you could update us on how long you think that would firm up beyond the end of this year. And then conversely, if you were to go down a path of cost of service, Can you give us an update on how much extended you think that process would be? And then the second part to my question would be around risk sharing. In the past, producers valued total certainty and Enbridge provided that and took on that risk. But you also earlier in your comments mentioned, you know, inflationary indices, et cetera. So I just wanted to comment on what potential no-fly zones, if you can, are in terms of what risks you might be less inclined to take on in this iteration, including volume risk.
spk05: Do you want to take that? Sure. Sure. Thanks, Linda.
spk04: So you're right to – acknowledge that I think the different paths could have different regulatory, you know, follow-on time horizons, right? That's intuitive. A settlement could be shorter, could be much shorter. A, you know, full-on cost-to-service application, you know, would take, you know, a year or more. We – everyone understands that and I think is – blending that into their discernment here on the whole package. And I think I'll amplify the word package because I think your next part of the question kind of tried to dive into specific puts and takes, and I think it will be a package if there is a settlement. In the past, you're right, shippers have liked total certainty. We have accepted the risks, plural, in exchange for a risk premium in the toll, right? And so that's, you know, the nexus of the conversation again. What is the appropriate premium for these risks? And again, we mentioned this extra time does allow us to ensure we've captured a good look at what those new macroeconomic parameters are. So I think everyone's got good visibility to make that judgment on appropriate risk premiums. We would look again to a toll indexation. I think Vern referenced that as a hallmark of our commercial model. We would look for that again. And it's probably a question of what that index level is. So at the end of the day, you know, I think we're hearing shippers like the service. They like the alignment model that Al characterized over 25 years. It trades well. hustle, and we're aligned. So the question is just really what is the appropriate tool and recognition of that. I think the other thing I'd add, Colin, I think you mentioned volume risk, Linda, and, you know, as Colin said, we've managed that and a whole bunch of other things over the years, and we're comfortable doing that, but it will come down to, you know, risk versus reward and getting an appropriate tool. return to manage that volume risk but you know embedded in that as well as i think you're pointing to it uh in the past that the shippers have uh have preferred toll certainty and that's one of the big benefits of of what we provided we start with the toll and you know we may escalate it depending on what the arrangement might be there but certainly um in a cost of service you don't have that certainty on toll and that's been one of the factors that uh is in the discussion.
spk12: Okay, thank you. And just as a follow-up, maybe continuing on the risk discussion, when you're allocating capital, how do you account for geographic risk? geopolitical risk. I think the perception is it's going up in certain parts of the world and supply chain as well. There would be certain components in some of your energy infrastructure that might become more uncertain in terms of cost as well as timeline. How are you mitigating that and how are you factoring that into your capital allocation decisions and how often do you reassess that because it does appear to be quite dynamic?
spk04: Yeah, I think you're right. Well, you know, Vern's finance group is pretty pedantic about cost of capital and those types of risks that you pointed out. So maybe I'll turn it over to him for that one. So, Linda, when we look at each and every individual project that we invest in, we come up with a hurdle rate for that specific project. So that hurdle rate will take into account schedule risk, And capital cost risk. So, schedule risk really gets into how long does it take you to get permits? How long do you think it's going to take you to build the project? Is there going to be opposition? So, the uncertainty of those things get baked into the hurdle rate. Similarly, for supply chain, that generally comes into how much capital cost risk are you going to be exposed to in building out a specific project. So, again, we'll look at the very specific aspects of supply chain for an individual project when we come up with a project-specific hurdle rate. Over and above that, if we're entering a new jurisdiction that we haven't done business And before, there can be a country risk premium added on top of all these other premiums we've talked about. So hopefully that answers your question. Probably goes down to the state level too, hey, Vern. Oh, absolutely. We have different regions in the U.S. where, you know, frankly, it's easier in some places and way more difficult in others. So that's built into his schedule risk premium comment.
spk12: Thank you. And just as a housekeeping question, would you be able to provide the actual day you're going to be giving 2023 guidance later this month and the scope of what would be included in that beyond maybe DCF per share guidance and EBITDA guidance, given that your investor day has been pushed to March?
spk05: Bernd, do you want to speak to that? Our plan right now is to provide that on November 30th.
spk04: We'll provide a full suite of information on 2023 at that time. Yeah, I think we'll do the usual notice, Linda, maybe a week or two out just to make sure that we've got that day right. I think Vern's got it. Yeah, so that's the process.
spk08: Thank you.
spk05: Great. Thank you.
spk15: Your final question comes from the line of Pernice Satish with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
spk14: Thanks, good morning. On T-South, I think on the last earnings call, you had pegged the cost of the project, or at least the initial cost to be 2.5 billion, but now it looks like it's 3.6 billion. So I guess what's changed, and maybe can you help us understand the cadence of CapEx spending? Which years would see the most of the CapEx to be deployed? And then finally, are there any stretches of the project that could be challenging, either from a construction standpoint or permitting? And that's all I have. Thank you.
spk04: Okay. Thank you. Maybe we'll turn this one over to Cynthia.
spk13: Thanks, Alan. Thanks, Denise. So with the T-South project, our original cost estimate, you know, we've had an opportunity now to build in some of the inflationary pressures that we've seen recently. So that is more of a comprehensive estimate associated with that. And that's still an order of magnitude estimate we're going to be going through and doing the detailed design work and environmental impact estimate type work in the outreach. But that will be done, and we'll have a more detailed estimate kind of in Q1 of 2024 to support the 2024 filing. As I look at the other parts of your question, you know, what's going to be critically important for us as we go forward with the permitting and the approval of this process through the regulatory is to make sure we engage with the Indigenous communities. So that's a critical part of our ongoing outreach and how we're going to be successful in moving that project forward, as well as looking at our emission impact, so focusing in on electric drives. When it comes to the actual right-of-way, again, this is an area that we're familiar with. It's not a greenfield project, so that's a good start, but we will do that detailed assessment. From the overall permitting process, this fits into – You know, kind of the middle category. So, we're very familiar with the activities. Having said that, though, as I mentioned, it's going to be critically important that we engage with all our stakeholders to put us in a really good position to move forward through the permitting and approval process.
spk04: Maybe I can just follow on to answer about the capital. The capital, the large bulk of the capital does not get spent until you're through the regulatory process. And Cynthia mentioned that the regulatory process is scheduled to start in 2024.
spk02: So if you envision that 2028 in service date, the bulk of the capital is getting spent in that 27, 28 timeframe. Got it. Thank you.
spk14: Appreciate it.
spk15: Okay. Thank you. This concludes the question and answer session. I will now turn the call over to Rebecca Morley for final remarks.
spk11: Great. Thank you. And we appreciate your ongoing interest in Enbridge. As always, our investor relations team is available following the call for any additional questions you may have. And once again, thank you and have a great day.
spk15: Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. We appreciate your participation. This concludes today's conference. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer