Equity Commonwealth

Greetings and welcome to Equity Commonwealth 4th Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. If anyone should require operator assistance during a conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Sarah Burns, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Capital Markets. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Doug. Good morning, and thanks for joining us to discuss Equity Commonwealth's results for the quarter and full year ending December 31st, 2021. On the call today are David Helfand, President and CEO, David Weinberg, COO, and Bill Griffith, CFO. Please be advised certain matters discussed during the conference call may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. We refer you to the section titled Forward-Looking Statements in the Press Release issued yesterday, as well as the section titled Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. for subsequent quarters for discussion of factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from any forward-looking statement. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any forward-looking statements made today. We post important information on our website at eqcre.com, including information that may be material. The portion of today's remarks on our quarterly earnings also includes certain non-GAAP financial please refer to yesterday's press release and our supplemental containing our results for a reconciliation of these non-GATT measures to our GATT financial results. With that, I will turn the call over to David Helfand.

Thanks, Sarah. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. I'll provide an update on the company's results for the quarter and full year, as well as comment on our plans for 22. Net loss, FFO and NFFO, were roughly flat in the fourth quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2020. We've seen leasing activity pick up in the fourth quarter with 51,000 square feet of new and renewal leases signed and greater tour activity. Rents on new and renewal leases were flat on a cash basis and up 2.8% on a GAAP basis versus expiring leases. Leased occupancy was 82.3%, and commenced occupancy was 79.2%. at 2021 year end. For the full year 2021, net loss was 20 cents per share compared to $3.56 per share of net income in 2020. The decline was primarily the result of a decrease from gains on property sales and a decrease in interest income. The 19 cent per share decline in FFO for the full year 2021 compared to 2020 was largely the result of a decrease in interest income an increase in G&A expense, and a decrease in NOI from property sold, and a decrease in same property NOI. The $0.16 per share decline in NFFO for the full year 2021 compared to 2020 was largely the result of a decrease in interest in other income, a decrease in same property cash NOI and lease termination fees, and a decline in NOI from property sold, which was offset by a decrease in G&A expense. excluding executive severance. General and administrative expense for the year totaled $37.4 million and included $7.1 million of executive severance expense and a $1.4 million tax related to a 2020 disposition. Excluding those two items, G&A in 2021 was $30.3 million compared to $31.8 million in 2020. We expect G&A to be approximately $30 million this year. Same property NOI increased 5.2% in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was largely due to an increase in NOI at 1225 17th Street in Denver as the property experienced an increase in parking revenues and tenant reimbursements. Same property cash NOI was up 0.8% during the quarter due to improved parking revenues, lower real estate tax expense, and expiration of free rent at 1225 17th Street, which was offset by an increase in free rent and occupancy decreases at 1258 Street in Washington, D.C. and 206 East 9th Street in Austin. The same property NOI decreased 7.2% for the full year 2021 compared to the full year 2020. The decrease was largely due to decreases in occupancy at 1258 Street in Washington, D.C. and 206 East 9th in Austin. as well as decrease in early termination income and lower parking revenue for the full year. This was offset by increased occupancy at 12-25-17 and higher tenant reimbursements. Same property cash NOI decreased 8.8% during the full year 2021 due to lower occupancy, an increase in free rent, and a decrease in parking revenue for the year, offset by free rent expiration at 12-25-17 Street. We have approximately $2.8 billion of cash or over $24 per share. In 2021, we repurchased 6.7 million of our common shares for $174 million or $25.85 per share. This year through February, we've repurchased an additional 2.2 million shares for $57 million at an average price of $25.78 per share. With more than $23 a share in net cash, we view the share repurchases as a low-risk means of investing EQC's capital. In total, since we began buying back shares in 2015, we have repurchased 18.5 million shares for just under $500 million at an average dividend-adjusted price of $22.13. We currently have $69 million remaining on our existing share buyback authorizations. Turning to the current market environment, leasing activity in our portfolio accelerated noticeably with more TERS and generally more activity in the fourth quarter. 2021 saw sales volumes recover for U.S. office properties. The $110 billion of sales marked a significant increase from 2020's level of $66 billion that was on par with sales volumes in 2018 and 2019. Clearly, there remains abundant equity capital targeting real estate assets. Debt capital remains readily available as well, and despite the recent move in base rates and spreads, debt remains priced at historically attractive levels. Against this backdrop, we continue to evaluate a wide range of investment opportunities, including portfolio purchases and corporate transactions, both public and private. As we've mentioned in the past, we're evaluating opportunities where the EQC team would steward the go-forward business as well as opportunities where the management team of the acquired business would lead the company going forward. For 2022, our focus remains capital allocation, leasing, and asset management. In addition, we expect to market one or more of our four properties for sale. Finally, we know that Sheryls would like more clarity on timing. It's reasonable to ask how much longer we'll continue the effort to find the right opportunity. While I don't have a clear answer, What I can say is that we're mindful of the cost of pursuing opportunity and continue to evaluate the best course of action to maximize shareholder value. Before we go to questions, I want to take a minute and acknowledge Jeff Brown's many contributions over the past eight years. As Chief Accounting Officer, Jeff has been a meaningful part of EQC's success. All of us at EQC wish you the best, appreciate your leadership, and thank you for your mentoring of our outstanding accounting team. I'd also like to congratulate Andrew Levy on his promotion to Chief Accounting Officer. Andrew has worked with us since we took over EQC in 2014 and is well prepared for this new opportunity. With that, David, Bill, and I are happy to take your questions.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, it's our one new ask a question. Our first question comes from the line of Manny Corchman with Citigroup. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks for all that, David, and thanks for leading with what I guess investors are asking about. Maybe if we dive in, you talk about increasing leasing in a few office assets that you continue to own. How does that maybe newfound momentum in leasing an office change your views on that asset class overall, and especially contrasting that to the fact that you're still talking about selling at least one of those assets?

Hey, Manny. It's David. That's a great question. I would say what we're seeing is consistent with the headlines regarding office in general. There's clearly been a flight to quality. If you dig into the lease economics with respect to the better assets, better markets, better locations, you can kind of see rents holding and, you know, higher concession packages overall just given the competitive environment and cost of construction. So we're still remain bullish on better assets and better markets. Um, and then, you know, I would say in the next year of assets, um, overall, it's still very competitive and there's still some sublease space that, uh, is a nice alternative for tenants looking at that price point. We're fortunate in that our portfolio, we've got assets in Denver to an Austin, which are clearly winners coming out of COVID. And our DCS, it's a nice asset, but in a very competitive market. So I think we remain bullish on office relative to perhaps many of our peers, but I'd also say we're cautious at the same time because we recognize there's a clear distinction between quote-unquote the good office properties and those that may be challenged for some time.

And maybe... It may seem obvious, but is that clear in the capital markets? If you wanted to buy the better office buildings, are they pricing appropriately in your view?

Well, I would say if you go back to our comments on office, those still hold. So if by better office buildings, you mean those trophy assets in growth markets with term and credit, they are pricing at pre-COVID levels. low four caps above replacement cost. So those other offices that, you know, in the secondary non-growth markets, commodity buildings, vacancy enrolled, where it's a little murkier in terms of how the capital markets are pricing it, and I would describe that as more hand-to-hand combat, and it's very deal-specific, and to be determined how that plays out.

Great. And then I think you guys gave a view on where G&A would be, if I caught this correctly, for 2022 at $30 million. What's specifically driving those G&A savings?

I don't think savings. I think if you adjust our 21 number, we're roughly flat to 21 with that $30 million estimate. Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Manny. As a reminder, it is Star 1 to ask a question. There are no other questions at this time. I'd like to hand the call back over to David Helfand for closing remarks.

Well, thank you, everyone, for joining us, and thank you to Manny for asking a question. Side note, we are definitely here for the donuts, but that's not all. Appreciate everyone's time. Look forward to catching up with you, and be well.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.