This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Dear all, thank you for listening in to Frontline's second quarter earnings call. In the second quarter, we had a very untypical spike for VLCC and Susmax towards the end. And this put us in a position to make some extra cash and also to carry some value into the third quarter. Most interestingly, this spike was caused by minor weather delays telling a tale of how narrowly balanced our market is. The macroeconomical headwinds seem to have a very muted impact on our little part of the global macro puzzle, and we'll get to that later in the presentation. I think it's worth mentioning that in the markets like these, Frontline's efficient and transparent platform comes to shine in effectively turning revenues to shareholder returns. Our running cost remains fairly stable, as expressed in our cash break-even levels, and all the incremental income goes straight to the bottom line and back to you shareholders. Before I give the word to Inger, let's look at our TCN numbers on slide three in the deck. In the second quarter, Frontline achieved $64,000 per day on our VLCC fleet, $61,700 per day on our SUSEMAX fleet, and $52,900 per day on our LR2 slash Afromax fleet. I hope you're all fairly comfortable with these numbers, and we are back to a somewhat reverted earnings relationship between our segments, where the VLCC makes the most. We have secured quite firm numbers as we progressed into Q3, with 74% of our VOCC days booked at $53,200 per day, 67% of our SUSEMAX days fixed at $48,800 per day, and 57% of our LR2 slash AFRA days at $40,500 per day. And again to remind you all these numbers are on a load to discharge basis and they will be affected by the amount of ballast days that we end up having towards the end of Q3. Now I'll let Inger take you through the financial highlights.
spk06: Thanks Lars and good morning and good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. Let's then turn to slide four profit statement and look at some highlights. In the second quarter of 2023, we recorded the highest second quarter profit since 2008 of 230.7 million or 1.4 cents per share. Adjusted profit came in at 210 million or 0.95 per share. Revenues came in at 513 million. We declare a cash dividend of 80 cents per share for the second quarter of 2017. I will mention that following the transition to IFRS, dry docking costs will be capitalized and subsequently depreciated over the period to the next scheduled dry docking, which is two and a half to five years. In the second quarter, dry docking costs of one million have been capitalized and one vessel was dry docked in this quarter. In addition, I will mention that the company revised the estimated use for life of its vessels from 25 years to 20 years effective January the 1st, 2023. Let's then look at some balance sheet highlights on slide five. The company has no remaining new building commitments as the company took delivery of the two last new buildings from Urkla in some time in January 2023. The company has strong liquidity of 719 million dollars in cash and cash equivalents including undrawn amount of unsecured facility. marketable securities and minimum cash requirements for bank as per the 32 June 2023. And we have a healthy leverage ratio of 51%. Then lastly let's look at the flow potential on slide six. We estimate industry-leading cash break-even rates of 22,700 fleet average, including dry dock cost for eight SUSEMAX tankers in 2023. Four in the third quarter and four in the fourth quarter. The Q223 fleet average bought excluding dry dock was $7,300 per day. We noticed from this Take a graph on the right-hand side. That free cash flow indicates strong potential return. If we assume we have to see TCE rates of $75,000 per day, it's five and a half year historic spread to be able to see for Zeus Max and LRQ tankers. The annual free cash flow potential is $1.4 billion or $6.34 per share, which translates into a free cash flow yield of 36%. With this, I'll leave the word to Lars again.
spk00: Thank you Inger. So let's go to slide seven and look at what's going on in the current market. So we've just been through a very volatile summer market. Hopefully it's coming to an end. The key themes have been Asia Pacific, continue to pull volume. We're seeing increased supply from what I refer to as new exporters, as you can see on the bottom right-hand side chart. This is United States and Brazil. They're not really new, but they are kind of growing at least. And then Guyana, which is like the added spice to the mix here. OPEC cuts production predominantly around the Middle East. And with the continuous pull from Asia-Pacific, we've seen ton miles increase, and benefiting, we also see ton miles in particular. Year on year, or quarter of Q2 last year versus Q2 this year, demand in the Asia-Pacific region is actually up 1.8 million barrels per day. That's quite significant, considering most of that oil is being freighted on tankers, And it represents about a 5% increase in tonnage or volume for going on shipping. And that those 5% is not taking into account a ton mile effect. We started to see that the Russian price cap started to bite in Q2. I'll come a bit back to that later. We are also seeing refinery margins improving as we move towards the end of maintenance season. And we have the background music of basically every analyst under the sun expecting oil demand to grow by about two million barrels per day for the second half. Let's go to slide eight and I'll go through the Russian price cap and what effects that has had on our markets. So the G7 oil price cap came into effect in December 2022, and it will set up $60 per barrel for Russian crudes. We're using on the bottom left-hand side the euros as a reference oil price, and it's predominantly the quality one discusses around Russian supply. With the price moving above the price cap, it's becoming increasingly complex to freight Russian oil. We've seen various kind of policies amongst owners, whether if they're willing to service the Russian market or not, year to date. But what we have seen now recently is that some of these owners are less lenient to lift Russian barrels, basically because it's very hard to argue you're doing it inside the framework of the current sanctions. These vessels are then returning to the non-Russian market or the plain Manila, Susmax and Afromax markets. And this has put pressure on rates as obviously the capacity then has increased, particularly in these fleet sizes. Product exports have been less. It hasn't yet traded above the price cap. It is actually flirting with the price cap now, where the price cap is actually at $100 for gasoline. Not that gasoline is a big product for Russian exports, but it's a product to represent where it is. And gasoline in Singapore is now trading very close to $100 per barrel. We've seen Russian exports kind of falling quite rapidly due to this. We've lost 1.7 million barrels per day of Russian exports since the peak in April. 400 000 barrels of that is products and we see that the fall there is less pronounced. But 1.3 million barrels per day of crude or fuel oil has been lost during the last five six months. It's going to be very interesting to see how this develops further. We're starting to see analysts arguing for the Russian controlled fleet or the Russian owned fleet struggling to maintain volumes, which is evident looking at the export statistics. The only way they can kind of replace the capacity there now would be to actually go into the non-Russian trading fleet and purchase more assets. There are actually, in fact, fairly high numbers of vessels that's needed, in order for them to maintain their export levels, should they want to do so. They're obviously a part of OPEC+, so the official argument will always be that they're working in line with the OPEC strategy, with the voluntary cuts, but we believe that it can be very interesting to see what happens in both the market for older purchases, the older vessels in the classes we trade, particularly then Afromax and Susmax as this progresses. Let's move to slide nine and look at what's going on in the refinery world. I think it's important, we almost forget because we've had so many black swans and whatnot in the tanker industry for the last few years. But the seasonal summer slowness or softness is in fact caused by the scheduling of refinery maintenance. On the bottom left hand side there we see kind of global refinery outages. These are basically refining volume that's been taken out due to maintenance work. And we see it's a very distinct kind of high in April. And, you know, likewise, there's also a distinct high in September, October, where refineries are shut in basically to do maintenance work so that they can run effectively, either for the summer season or for the winter season. This has, you know, fairly significant effect on demand for oil and also demand for tonnage What we see now is that we're heading in towards kind of on the refinery turnaround side, we're actually fairly low, but we're going, you know, we are going to go into the high turnaround season in September, October. So it's actually, you know, looking at it on face value, it looks, you know, fairly bearish for tank demand. But one has to remember that the tankers are fixed ahead. we'll see now it's being fixed for mid-September and the oil will land you know in the various refining regions by end September if you look at West African crude that's being fixed today will actually land in the beginning of October and in the US Gulf we're actually already fixing for oil that will land in the mid-October so basically it's Over the next few weeks, we will start to see the purchasing managers on behalf of the refineries starting to plan to bring more oil into the refinery as they come out of turnaround. Looking at the refinery margins, they are firming. This is obviously a result of refinery outages, but it's also a fairly strong signal of demand expected to look fairly okay. The diesel margins are leading the pace, and this is typical for the season. The winter season is kind of predominantly a diesel market, at least historically due to heating, whilst the summer market is more a gasoline market due to driving. We had a very mild winter last year in the northern hemisphere, Well, the jury is still out, but will we have that occurring again? Let's move to slide 10, and this should be known to everyone who's been on a front-line call before. Basically the fleets and order books. It's kind of the notable thing to comment on in this quarter is actually the increase in ordering for LR2s. We've seen 50 new LR2 orders being placed in the first half of this year, and that's bringing up the order book to close to 20%. We also use a measure of a 20-year effective lifetime for trading a tanker. This 20-year is actually more like a 15-year for an LR2. LR2s have coated tanks. and the coating in these tanks will kind of lose its quality over years. So the charters are very hesitant to book a clean LR2 above 15 years. If you use that as a measure, about 22.9% of the LR2 fleet, it's going to be above 15 years this year, then the order book actually doesn't really look that worrying. What is worrying is the lack of order books for Veal's disease and SUSEMAX. We have the highest percentage of kind of the population above 20 years we've ever seen. You know, 108 VLCCs will be either be above or past 20 years this year. 85 SUSEMAXs will be above or past 20 years this year. And on the order book side, if you go into the market to book a tanker now, and particularly on the VLCC, you're looking at the second half 2026 delivery. That's three years from now, and it doesn't really add up to the overall expectations of oil demand remaining fairly firm for the next three to four years. So with that, I'm going to move into the summary side on Guide 11. We're very happy to report the highest second quarter profit since 2008, $210 million and a cash dividend of 80 cents per share. In the last four quarters, if my record is correct, Inger, we've paid out $2.72. That's correct, yeah. And, you know, with an average share price during that period of $13.9, that's a 20% yield. So quite impressive, I believe. Asia demand continues to be supportive, and OPEC cuts are driving ton miles. The price cap on Russia crude is starting to bite, and what's going to happen next there. Seasonal refinery maintenance coming to an end, and margins are improving. And this is what we're going to kind of see reflected in particularly the VLC, and then secondly, the SUSEMax markets over the next few weeks. ordering is still muted for the bigger vessels for the one million barrel and the two million barrel vessels but LR2s we've seen a lot of activity in the last couple of months how the big question is obviously how the winter will play out this year but then I think kind of the background music and the absolute biggest question in the tanker industry going forward is represented by the chart at the bottom here The tanker order book has a percent of fleet. I've just taken it from 1996 to show kind of a little bit of the history behind us. We see the dark kind of blue line, which is the product tankers that started to react, but not to any extent so far. And then we see the gray one being the VLCC, which is supposed to be the pipeline of the world on crude oil.
spk07: virtually nothing on order so with that I think we can open up two questions thank you dear participants as a reminder if you wish to ask a question please press star one one on your telephone keypad and wait for a name to be announced to withdraw your question please press star one one again please stand by we will compile the Q&A roster this will take a few moments And now we're going to take our first question. And the question comes from the line of John Chappell from Evercore. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
spk01: Thank you. Good afternoon. Excuse me. Laura, you mentioned in this closing slide the question about the winter. Everything seems queued up pretty well from, you know, the inventories to the refinery maintenance coming to an end to the IEA's outlook for the second half sequential recovery. What can go wrong this winter? Is it just a macro event where oil demand continues to disappoint? Is there something related to Russia? Do the Saudis become more emboldened and keep more oil off the market so there's a bigger inventory draw but the tankers don't see the demand? Where can we miss the typical seasonal recovery that seems set up so well?
spk00: I think there's two key factors that needs to be watched. One is obviously China. You know, there's mixed signals kind of from, so in our little part of the world, as I mentioned, which is transport of oil, China looks to run on all cylinders. Their import numbers are kind of record high every month. And that doesn't tally up with kind of all the other macroeconomical data coming out of China. So if they're building a lot of inventories into the winter here, they have, at least historically, they've been able to kind of take the foot off the gas pedal and suddenly disappoint by one or two million barrels per day in their import program. And if that happens, that's obviously not going to be very, very bullish. So I think that's the big question. Are they running in preparation for other stimulus that will stimulate their economy to need basically all this oil? Are they importing in order to have the ability to export into the winter season? Or are they basically trying to hoard crude oil before an expected price increase on crude oil or others, you know, it's very difficult to know, but I think that's the thing to watch and, you know, kind of with the imports next to all the economical news we're getting out of China, it's, you know, one tends to become a little bit worried. Secondly, it's obviously the weather and the weather we can't really control. You know, whether if, you know, we're going to have a repeat of last year, which was fairly warm, or if we're going to, you know, have a proper full-on winter, which is going to kind of affect demand on the positive side. So I think those two are the key factors that at least I'm a little bit concerned about.
spk01: Okay. That makes sense. Just a follow-up question on strategy. I thought it was interesting you noted the dearth. I mean, we all know that there's not much of an order book, but you said that's even a concern. that there's not enough ships to offset some of the older ships. You know, it's kind of rare to see frontline without anything on your new building plan. You know, given that give and take of not getting a ship for three years or, you know, the economics of it versus maybe a need at some point in the back of the decade, how do we think about your capital investment on new builds or secondhand ships going forward?
spk00: Well, I think on the new build, we are definitely sitting on the fence. We've been kind of commenting on that before. You need flat out north of $50,000 per day every day for 20 years in order to make sense of going and ordering a new build at these levels. And then obviously you have the technology discussion kind of adding to that. So we don't see that as a good proposition. On the second-hand market, yes, we will always be looking. But I think, as you also know, there's been extremely little modern tonnage offered. There has been a couple of deals done, but it's been very, very slow. So it hasn't really been a big option. So this is where I've kind of alluded to in previous calls that, you know, maybe we are in a harvest period. It's difficult to say.
spk01: Would you harvest by selling any more older tonnage, or are you just happy with the fleet as it stands today?
spk00: I think we're fairly content with the composition of the fleet. Of course, we have some units that kind of further down the line would probably look to let go off, but we We're fairly comfortable. Some of the older vessels we hold are modified or derated and so forth. So they're actually holding pretty well into the things to come on the regulatory side. So we're fairly content.
spk01: Great. Thank you very much, Lars.
spk00: Thank you, John.
spk07: Thank you. And now we're going to take our next question. Just give us a moment. And the next question comes to the line of Amit Mehrotra from Deutsche Bank. The line is open. Please ask your question.
spk03: Hi. Good morning. Good afternoon. This is Chris Robertson on for Amit. Hi, Chris. Hi. Hi. Lars, I just wanted to go back to the discussions around the supply coming back into the market from the Russia trade. So as these ships come back in, are they in the penalty box at all in terms of returning to the quote unquote vanilla market? Are they trading normally? How much of that supply just won't ever come back? Can you talk about that a bit more?
spk00: Yeah, it's, you know, we've been kind of previously talking about the DART fleet, which is obviously the Venezuela and the Iranian trading vessels. And they are, you know, kind of in a penalty box forever. And then we have the grey fleet, which, you know, maybe kind of have questionable trading history and will struggle to get accepted by kind of compliant charters that way. And then, you know, we have the non-trading Russian fleet or the, you know, just touching the Russian oil, you know, on a few occasions fleet and whatnot. And it's, you know, it's... It's shades of gray, if that makes sense. What we've observed when some of these units come back to, say, the plain vanilla West African TD20 market is that they might have to discount a little bit in order to get going. But we haven't seen a huge resistance from charters to, you know, as long as they don't have kind of shady SDS history in their market, in their kind of papers or have kind of activity that can't be explained, they're actually fine to get back. And I think we need to remind everyone of, you know, transport of Russian crew that has, you know, it's legal as long as it's within the sanctions.
spk03: Right. Yeah, that was good color. My follow-up question is related to your comments around the order book, and then the lack of scrapping. As you think about 20-year-old vessels, could you give some commentary around how much of a discount those vessels are currently earning in the market compared to the average? Because if it's at a shallow discount, it would imply the ships might stick around for longer.
spk00: Yeah, no, I think it's a question of that portion of the fleet is not really engaged in the normal freight market that we at least compete in. It's been a long while since we've seen a plus 20 vessel fixed by any commercial party. I think the last one was IOC last fall. So I think the way we measure it is not the discount they have to accept, but it's more the efficiency they're able to offer. So this is why we kind of in our S&D model tends to cut their efficiency in half the minute they pass 20 years. But I think that question is probably coming, so I'm going to put that in there. As we proceed here, I think, yes, there is a scenario where ships will have to actually service the market for a longer period of time. And although not what we want, but we will potentially see more and more charters having to accept 20 plus vessels as a part of their, you know, to service them and to get oil moved. But that can only happen when we have a firm pricing. You know, we need earnings to get to a level where, you know, the charters like Chevron, BP, Shell, Total and all these guys And their vetting departments say, hey, okay, you know, well-maintained 22-year-old vessels, we can use that. But they're not going to use that until you have rates up in the $100,000, $150,000, $200,000 per day, I believe. Okay. Yeah, thanks for that, Collar.
spk03: I'll turn it over. Thank you.
spk07: Thank you. And now we're going to take our next question. And now the next question comes to the line of Omar Nocta from Jeffrey. So the line is open. Please ask a question.
spk04: Thank you. Hey, good afternoon, guys. I have a couple of questions just as a follow-up, I think, to John's questions at the beginning and your comments maybe first just on the order book and your thoughts about your disinterest, I guess, in ordering VLCCs. given the time frame and the cost. Is that commentary just based on the VLCCs, or does that also hold for the SUIS MAXs and LR2s?
spk00: I think for the VLCCs, that's more us, because we're We're quite content on the SUSEMax size we carry. And we also have very modern SUSEMax fleet, predominantly very modern SUSEMax fleet. So for us, it's been looking into the VLCC space. And I think also we've communicated quite clearly that we believe that VLCCs over time, basically due to the benefit of the size, kind of offers our investors more bang for the buck. But I think you could say it's the same for the Suez masses as well. The challenge we have actually in this market, if you look further into the shipyard industry, is that one thing is that the owners are not really interested in ordering them, but yards are not really interested in taking the orders either. As long as there are higher margin kind of ships to build, they will prefer that. So it's kind of a little bit twofold. I also had a look at, you know, kind of the overall yard capacity in the world. And, you know, it's probably anybody's guess, but it's somewhere between 150 and 200 shipyards in the world servicing, you know, kind of commercial segments that we care about and you know you have I think currently more than 100 yards building dry bulk vessels, you have more than 80 yards building container vessels, you have 13 yards I believe that currently has a tanker in the order book So it's quite peculiar and also you have the other thing is that if you take off those 13 yards that build an anchor there's actually very few that can build a VLCC. So it's a structural kind of issue we have at hand here as long as the Koreans are completely absent from the VLCC building side.
spk04: Thanks, Lars. That's interesting. Something has to give at some point. Maybe just one follow-up and also kind of what John was talking about and maybe the inverse of the question of what could go wrong. Maybe what could go right in terms of this market over the next few months? Clearly, you laid it out in your opening remarks. But just in general, we've seen, as you mentioned, the refining margins have gone up. We've seen LR2s push higher. And so, when we think about both crude and products here over the next few months, should we think that LR2s will outperform for now? And then what are you looking for in terms of, you know, laying the groundwork for crude tankers to start to get a bounce?
spk00: Well, I think kind of at the end of today we need – you know if we get oil demand you know anywhere near where EIA or IEA or OPEC or whoever you ask put it that we're gonna consume 103, 103 and a half million barrels per day in December I think that's basically all we need if that trajectory is true I think we're gonna kind of gradually come out of here and also you know Russia is obviously a big X-factor in addition to China. It's quite likely that with that demand projection, oil prices will behave fairly okay. And then I think there will be initiatives to start to get hold of assets that can actually transport their product. products, and that will kind of be the reverse of what we've seen just now, where a lot of Russian or former Russian trading vessels have started to compete with us in the Suez Max and Afro markets. They're basically going to go back I saw one headline from a broker that, you know, this fall, if that plays out, it's going to be, you know, very good for S&P brokers that deal with the kind of tonnage going in that direction, to put it that way. And this is obviously going to be the older tonnage in both the Sysmax and Afromax fleets. And then there is also an alternative story starting to develop on all the kind of headwinds coming out of China, because you can speculate, what will they actually do now? Will they allow the country to run at half steam until they get to some sort of natural recovery? Or will they actually start to stimulate in order to carry kind of their economy over this this gap and if they do so I think we'll get the same result you know we will have the two million barrels extra of demand and we will have a healthy kind of continued health import into China so I think it's very it's very easy to paint a bullish picture here I think it's more important to try and look for the cracks because it's almost too good to be true
spk04: Yeah, it certainly looks like it. The script is written, and we just have to follow through on it. Great, okay. Well, thanks, Lars. I'll pass it over. Thank you.
spk07: Thank you. Now we're going to take our next question. And the question comes through the line of Chris Tsang from Berber Research.
spk08: Your line is open. Please ask a question. Excuse me, Chris. Your line is open. Please ask your question. Hello? Did you say Chris?
spk07: Yes, Chris Chung. Your line is open.
spk02: Hey. Sorry about that. Hey, Lars. Hey, Inger. How are you? Hi, Chris. You're fine. I'm good. Thanks. I just have a quick question on your fleet. What are your plans for the two 2010 built VLCCs without scrubbers? Would you look to install scrubbers, or could those vessels be sold, and what would the timing be for those decisions?
spk00: Well that's a fairly specific question. I think it's very likely that they will have scrubbers, you know, in accordance with the dry docking schedule. But we don't have any, you know, apart from that, you know, it's funny how some ships are lucky ships, so they actually make money literally around every corner, and these have been very, very good good operators. So for now, they're in our fleet. I'm going to remain there. Okay, fair enough. And one for you, Inger.
spk02: Sorry, I missed the part earlier where you provided dry docking. Can you repeat how many vessels you plan on dry docking for the rest of the year?
spk06: For the next year?
spk02: For the rest of the year.
spk06: For the rest of the year. For the rest of the year, we plan to dry dock eight sucevaxes. Four in the third quarter, and
spk07: or in the fourth quarter okay that's it for me thank you guys thank you thank you thank you dear participants as a reminder if you wish to ask a question please press star 1 1 on your telephone keypad now we're going to take our next question And the next question comes from Lowe McGibbon from Frank Winnie. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
spk05: Hi. Two questions. The first is, when you went from 25 to 20 years on your depreciation, how much did that reduce the earnings per share?
spk06: It was about, for a year, it totals about $60 million. So that means, yeah. Help me divide it by 222 million shares.
spk08: Yeah, whatever, just a moment.
spk07: Excuse me, do you have any further questions?
spk05: Yes, a second question. This deals with the.
spk06: 26 cents, that's the answer.
spk05: Okay, thank you. It's a conservative mood, and I applaud you for taking that. The premium on the modern vessels, I was wondering if you could discuss that, and in particular, the IMO guideline, the regulatory side that you've mentioned. When does the next major change kick in? And I was curious what makes up the premium that Frontline gets such a benefit on because it has the world's youngest fleet?
spk00: Yeah, it's, you know, it's, you know, that's like five questions in one, two, five answers at least. Now, first of all, I think kind of the biggest, well, it's actually not really an IMO change that's going to happen. It's the EU ETS. That's the next in line for us or for everyone in the industry. It's basically that we need to start to pay carbon tax in Europe, trading in Europe or trading into Europe or trading out of Europe. with the carbon emissions related to those voyages. That comes into effect next year. And I think it's gonna, maybe not so much for the bigger ships, because it's... they're not that frequent inside the EU zone, but for SUSEMAX and AFRAMAX and LR2s, it's going to have an impact. And there, you know, we do believe that having efficient vessels help a lot. Also, I think kind of the discussion around alternative fuels is going to become more and more important. Right now you wouldn't really willingly you know put the use kind of partially buy your fuel in your fuel mix basically because it costs more but obviously if you put it against the buying carbon credits you know then it becomes kind of economically economically effective to do so. So I think that's kind of the biggest headline on the regulatory framework going forward. I think your question was around the premium we achieve on our vessels due to having the modern ships. Was that correct?
spk05: Yes, in particular I was curious if interest rates have an effect, because on a shorter vessel, it's less costly to hold a couple hundred million dollars worth of oil, and also the insurance rates, how that would have affected because of shorter time frame.
spk00: Okay, so that's more like the trading side of it. if our charters are being limited by the high interest rates, because they're the ones who own the cargo, and they're the ones who basically have to then finance themselves from A to B. We haven't really seen that having an impact in the stock market, to be quite honest. I think it's more a discussion for Had we been in a carrier market, meaning that oil was going to be stored on ships, it would have had a huge effect. The difference between having 0.5 interest per day and the 7% interest per day has a huge impact on the economics of storing oil. But I think, in general, the financing cost has affected the world's, in general, willingness to keep inventory. And I think that is probably partly why we see inventory levels fairly low across the globe.
spk05: Okay, one final comment. What percentage of your business is European that would be affected by that regulatory side change?
spk00: It varies. And it also varies a lot amongst, you know, between asset classes. But I think our kind of the headline number would be 10% to 15% of our voyage days would be affected by the EU VTS.
spk05: Thank you, and I congratulate you both for running the most efficient best tanker fleet in the world.
spk07: Thank you very much. Thank you. There are no further questions, and I would now like to hand the conference over to Lars Bastad for any closing remarks.
spk00: Thank you very much, and thank you so much for listening in. You know, we are, the markets are a little bit kind of in the doldrums right now, but I'm hearing bottoming kind of from various sides of the the marketplace. Over the next few weeks we're gonna hopefully start to chew into the winter season and we're looking forward to see what comes. Thank you.
Disclaimer