Intercorp Financial Services Inc. Common Shares

Q4 2023 Earnings Conference Call

2/13/2024

spk04: Good morning and welcome to the Intercourt Financial Services Fourth Quarter 2023 Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. After the presentation, we will open the floor for questions. At that time, instructions will be given as to the procedures to follow if you would like to ask a question. Also, you can submit online questions at any time today using the window on your webcast, and they will be answered after the presentation during the question and answer session. Simply type your question in the box and click submit questions. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Miss Valentina Porto of Inspire Group. Ma'am, you may begin.
spk03: Thank you and good morning, everyone. On today's call, Intercourt Financial Services will discuss its Fourth Quarter 2023 earnings. We are very pleased to have with us Mr. Luis Felipe Castellanos, Chief Executive Officer Intercourt Financial Services, Miss Michaela Casassa, Chief Financial Officer Intercourt Financial Services, Mr. Gonzalo Basadre, Chief Executive Officer Interseguro, Mr. Bruno Ferreccio, Chief Executive Officer Interligo, Mr. Carlo Stori, Executive Vice President of Payments at Intercourt Financial Services. They will be discussing the results that were distributed by the company yesterday. There is also a webcast video presentation to accompany the discussion during this call. If you didn't receive a copy of the presentation or the earnings report, they are now available on the company's website, .com.pe to download a copy. Otherwise, for any reason, if you need any assistance today, please call Inspire Group in New York at -940-8843. I would like to remind you that today's call is for investors and analysts only. Therefore, questions from the media will not be taken. Please be advised that forward-looking statements may be made during this conference call. These do not account for future economic circumstances, industry conditions, the company's future performance or financial results. As such, statements are made based on several assumptions and factors that could change, causing actual results to materially differ from the current expectations. For a complete note on forward-looking statements, please refer to the earnings presentation and report issued yesterday. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Luis Felipe Castellanos, Chief Executive Officer of Intercorp Financial Services for his opening remarks. Mr. Castellanos, please go ahead, sir.
spk02: Thank you. Good morning, all, and welcome to our fourth quarter and full year, 2023 earnings call. I want to thank you very much for attending. I want to start by making a brief summary of our strategy at IFS. You know that our aspiration includes to become the leading digital financial services solution for clients, providing profitable products and services in our key businesses with the best digital experience for our customers based on operational excellence and levered on advanced analytics and the best talents as our competitive advantage. This is the strategy we are employing and we continue to execute it with a long term vision. Regarding economic environment, 2023 was a challenging year in Peru with virtually no GDP growth and contraction in domestic demand, which translated into a deterioration of the payment capabilities of our retail customers. On the positive side, inflation decreased consistently during the second half of 2023 and the central bank has reduced the solace reference rate by a hundred basis funds during the year to 6.25%. Also, expectations of a strong El Nino phenomenon have decreased and for 2024, GDP growth of around 3% is now expected, which is a good recovery versus last year. Despite this challenging environment, IFS continues to show resilience in its core operations. In 2023, we grew our customer base and revenues and we continue to consolidate the results of our digitalization efforts. At Interbank, market shares across key business lines remain strong despite moderation in consumer loss as we are still digesting increased levels of cost of risk, mainly in the consumer finance segments. Despite of the challenging conditions, Interbank remains well-provisioned and well-capitalist. At Interseuro, in 2023, we continued growing in premiums of individual life and retail insurance while consolidating market leadership in annuities. Investment results continue to be solid in the company. Although global market conditions impacted negatively our investment results in our wealth management business, in 2023, Intellibus results recovered from the negative profit posted in 2032. Finally, on payments, despite growth in merchants, volumes have moderated in 2023 and this has taken a toll in ECPAY's results. However, Interbank and ECPAY continue working on creating synergies while playing continues to accelerate with a fully interoperable P2P system. We remain confident that IFS will continue generating sustainable returns in the coming years as we are being cautious with our operations. Given the scenario we're facing today, we continue working on our long-term strategy which is to ultimately empower all Peruvians to achieve their financial wellbeing. Now, let me pass it on to Michaela so she can give you a detailed review of our results. Thank you.
spk01: Thanks Luis Felipe. Good morning and welcome everyone to Intercor Financial Services Year-end 2023 earnings call. Today, we will review five sections of our earnings presentation, starting with the macro outlook for Peru. On slide three, complementing what Luis Felipe mentioned, the decrease in GDP and in inflation for four quarters in a row has triggered the first cuts in the solace rate, driving it down from the peak of 7.75 to 6.25 as of today. Inflation has decreased from a yearly 8.8 at the peak of June 23 to 3% as of January, already within the central bank's target. An exchange rate has remained relatively stable. 2024 is expected to be a year of recovery for the Peruvian economy with an expectation of 3% GDP growth, mainly due to the following reasons. First, the base effect versus the first quarter 2023, as no major disruption is expected now that El Niño seems to be cooling down. Recovery on public investment after the first year of the newly elected regional governments. And lastly, more political stability which should positively impact private investment. On slide four, we wanted to point out your attention on the latest news on El Niño. After an inflection point in the probabilities of a strong to moderate Niño as of the end of 2023, we have started the year with very high probabilities for a -to-week Niño. This is very good news for the country as the economic recovery could speed up if no further disruption takes place in the coming months. On slide five, we are providing the main operating trends for the year ending 2023, which are all within the latest guidance provided during September. First, we continue to register sound capital levels with core equity tier one ratio closing the year at .8% and total capital ratio at 15.5%. There has been further moderation in the yearly total loan growth to 6% as of December and 7% in consumer loans and a stabilization of NIM at 5.5%. We continue to see good efficiency levels both at IFS and at the bank level as we are strictly monitoring and managing costs, especially at the bank, which has reached a cost income ratio around 37% as of year end, a strong improvement versus last year, mainly due to the good operating leverage. Cost of risk continues to be high in consumer lending, pushing the bank year end cost of risk to .3% in the lower range of the latest guidance. IFS ROE for the full year 2023 stands at 11.3%, impacted by cost of risk at interbank and soft investment results at Intelligo, slightly above the latest guidance. Now let's move to the second section of the presentation, which focuses on profitable growth. On page seven, we see a continuous growth of customer base at IFS or 11% year over year in banking, 6% in insurance, 9% in wealth management and 25% in payment merchants. On slide eight, in line with the previously mentioned macro scenario in previous quarter, we have further moderated banking activity by tightening credit standards, which had an impact in credit and debit card purchases as well as in retail and SME loan disbursements. Reduced activity in banking and increased cost of risk in the consumer portfolio have impacted the banking earnings in ROE, while investment returns impacted wealth management results. This quarter though, we have positive news in the insurance business, which posted solid investment results. With this, IFS earnings are at 286 million soles and ROE at .6% for the fourth quarter, driving the full year earnings to 1,080 million soles and ROE to .3% as shown in slides nine and 10. On slides 11 and 12, good news in top line, as total revenues continue to grow, 4% in the quarter and 10% for the full year, thanks to the growth registry in banking of 10%, wealth management growing more than eight times from a low base in 2022, insurance growing 1% and payments 5%. On slides 13 and 14, we wanted to give you more details on the risk profile of the portfolio. First of all, we wanted to mention that 44% of InterBank's portfolio is focused on commercial banking, which continues to behave nicely, mainly due to our conservative approach, which has always focused on low risk clients and has had a small participation in small and micro companies. This conservative approach has allowed us to maintain a lower PDL versus our peers to balance our higher focus in the riskier consumer portfolio. On the consumer portfolio, we have three different risks. First, the unsecured consumer portfolio, which is the one being impacted by the macro scenario and which represents 22% of the total loan book. Second, mortgages, which are also 22% of the loan book and third, payroll deductible loans to the public sector employees, a low risk segment, which represents 12% of the total loan book. This quarter, cost of risk of the bank remains high at .2% with retail cost of risk at 8.3%. Coverage ratio for the retail portfolio remains strong at 194% and above pre-COVID levels. Commercial banking cost of risk has seen a slight increase with an improvement in coverage ratio. On slide 14, we are giving you an update of the reschedulings in the consumer loan book. During the last quarter of 2023, these reschedulings represent 20% of the unsecured consumer loans and have increased only 100 million soles. Payment behavior for performing loans is different for customers with reschedulings. The unpaid portion for regular clients is only 2% while it is around 14% for rescheduled clients for installments matured as of December. Finally, on this section on slide 15, we wanted to highlight the tight management of costs we continue to pursue, which shows a 5% decrease in total expenses at IFS for the fourth quarter of 2023 and 6% reduction at interbank versus the previous year. With this, total expenses for the full year have only increased 2% at IFS, maintaining the efficiency ratio below 37% and has increased only 1% at interbank, driving the cost income ratio down more than 300 basis points to 37.3%. Moving on to the digital performance section of the presentation on slide 17 and 18, we are continuously building 100% digital solutions for a customer journey across our businesses. We have positive news in our digital indicators, which continue to show nice trends when compared to the previous year. As of December 23, digital customers reached 75% of retail customers who interact with the bank during the last 30 days, up four points in the past year. Digital sales reached 63% and our digital self-serving indicator has improved sharply from 77% to 82%. NPS has seen a deterioration for the first time in many quarters, mainly impacted by reactions related to risk profiling. Insurance and wealth management digital indicators show positive developments as well, with digital self-service reaching 59% at Interseguro, SOAT sales reaching 82% and digital premiums still small, but reaching 10% at Interseguro and digital transactions for fund management reaching 48% at Interfons. Now let's move to some more details on the performance of our four key businesses on slides 20 to 30. On slide 21, we have seen a -over-year growth at the bank this quarter, with net interest income growing 13%. Let me go back, sorry. On slide 20, started with banking and in line with our focus strategy, we continue increasing market shares, reaching .1% in retail deposits, .6% in commercial loans and retail loans at .1% as of December, 2023. There are a couple of things that we have been working hard in the past month and that are bringing nice results, as shown in the market share increase to .7% in payroll inflows from .6% one year ago and the .7% market share in sales financing up from .7% just 12 months ago. Now on slide 21, we have seen a 10% -over-year growth at the bank this quarter, with net interest income growing 13%, coming mainly from increased volume and yield on loans, 2% growth in fee income and 4% in other income. On slide 23, there has been a decrease in yield on loans of 30 basis points, reaching .3% and NIEM decreased 10 basis points to 5.5%. Risk adjusted NIEM decreasing the quarter in line with the increase in the cost of risk of consumer loans. Good news this quarter is that cost of funds remained flat at .2% as shown in slide 24. As we start to see the first impacts of a decrease in the Soles rate. Cost of funds has been rising in the past at market level, mainly due to two reasons. First, a continuous migration of retail deposits to more expensive term deposits, both in Soles and dollars and the higher remuneration to commercial and institutional, mainly in dollars as rates have continued to increase. Correction in overnight deposits rate in Soles continues, though at a slow pace. Our loan to deposit ratio of 103% is in line with the industry's average. Positive news is that the deposits continue to increase its share in total funding and that retail deposit market share has continued to increase. Now moving to insurance, premiums were down 4% in the quarter and market share of annuities was .4% as of November 23. Individual life and private annuities business lines continue to grow nicely quarter over quarter or 6% and 40% respectively, increasing their contribution to total premiums. On slide 25, the quarterly return over in the investment of the portfolio came extraordinarily high at .2% compared to the previous quarter, mainly due to some dividends received from a particular investments. The insurance portfolio is composed of 86% fixed income, 9% real estate and 5% equity and mutual funds as of December 23. Let me move now to wealth management. Good news in wealth management with the yearly growth in asset under management and 4% growth on a quarterly basis. This quarter we saw a negative impact from investment results but the core business continues to grow On payments, we want to give you a summary of the developments of our payment ecosystem. Growth in merchants and volumes continues with some moderation. EasyPay merchants increased 25% year over year reaching 1.3 million while transactional volumes grew 3%. E-commerce transactions are growing at the same pace and represent 16% of our total transactional volumes as of the end of December. In the case of EasyPay YAR, our solution for micro merchants, growth in merchants was 35% and was very strong in transactional volumes or 70%, all of which are linked to an interbank account. On slide 28, EasyPay represents a growing and profitable operation and is working on creating synergies with interbank. Revenues continue to grow 1% on a yearly basis and 13% in the quarter supported by the increase in transactional volumes and merchants with some pressures on MDRs coming from increased competition. We have seen a moderation in the transactional volume this quarter in line with the decreasing economic activity as market share continues to increase reaching 57% in physical acquiring and almost 24% in virtual acquiring. EBITDA has seen a contraction in the quarterly figures due to margin compression in a more competitive landscape. We have been working to accelerate the growth of our payment ecosystem by having all of our assets work towards a common strategy. We are focusing on increasing transactional volumes, offering merchants additional services, continue to pilot low risk loans to merchants and use EasyPay as a distribution network for interbank products as well as a source to increase float. We are starting to see results from this strategy as evidenced by the following four key figures. 25% yearly increase in EasyPay flow coming to interbank accounts and 48% increase in average balances from merchants. 1.5 times yearly increase in transactional volumes from micro merchants thanks to EasyPay YIE and more than 5,000 new credits disbursing our test of the new lending model to merchants. On slide 29, Plynk has been accelerated by the new landscape of interoperable P2P system. Plynk reached more than 14 million users as of the end of December with interbank participation at 46%. The volume of transactions has continued its strong growth reaching 2.4 times the volume registered the same quarter one year ago. Plynk and YAPI interoperability started in April and QR code interoperability was added in September. This has been an important development for financial inclusion in the country which the central bank has encouraged and which should help to bring more Peruvians into the financial system, reducing the use of cash which continues to be high in the country. Number of transactions have increased 3.3 times since the interoperability started. On slide 30, moving to our ESG update, we have reinforced our sustainability strategy. Our efforts in the last 12 months have allowed us to reach 61 points in the 2023 corporate sustainability assessment with an improvement of 11 points on the environmental dimension. Moreover, we have been included in the standard and poor's global sustainability yearbook 2024 based on our 2023 CSA score. On the social front, ECPA and our financial services education platform, Appendemas, are positively contributing to financial inclusion. On the environmental front, we are increasingly involved in green and sustainable financing by helping our customers grow their businesses in a sustainable way. Interbank has obtained a green certificate from Enel that certifies the consumption of renewable energy in 2023 at our main headquarters. It has signed a contract to support it. Now, let me move to the final part of the presentation where we provide the guidance for 2024 and some takeaways. On slide 32, 2024 guidance goes as follows. First, capital ratios to remain at sound levels with total capital ratio above 14% and core equity tier one ratio at around 11%. Second, a continued path to recovery towards our midterm target in core profitability with 2024 IFS ROE above 12%. In terms of loans growth, for 2024, we expect mid single digit growth in total loans. For 2024, we are focusing the NIM guidance on Interbank. We expect Interbank NIM to be stable and above 5.5%. Cost of risk is expected to remain high in 2024 above pre-COVID levels and reach a number below 4.3%, thus below 2023. It is important to remember that we included a moderate NINU phenomenon in our forward looking variables during the second half of 2023. And last, we will continue to focus on efficiency and especially on positive operating leverage. IFS efficiency ratio is expected to be around 37%, one of the best in the region. On slide 33, let me finalize the presentation with some key takeaways. First, after a weak 2023, macro sentiment for 2024 is relatively positive with minor disruption expected from El Nino. Second, good performance in insurance business and positive investment results in wealth management. Third, retail and more specifically consumer finance cost of risk remains high, but with strong coverage ratios. Four, tight management of costs reflected in solid efficiency levels. Cost of funds stabilizing on solid rates outlook. And we are strengthening our digital positioning and presence in payments. Thank you very much. Now we welcome any questions you might have. Let me only just mention that we have recently been notified that IFS has been included again in the MSCI small cap index. Now we welcome any questions you might have.
spk04: Thank you. At this time, we'll open the floor for questions. First, we'll take the questions from the conference call and then the webcast questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press the star key followed by the one key on your touchtone phone. Questions will be taken in the order in which they are received. If at any time you would like to remove yourself from the questioning queue, just press the star key then the number two. Again, to ask a question, please press star then one. For the webcast viewers, simply type your question in the box and click submit question. We'll pause momentarily to compile a list. Thank you. And the first question will come from Ornesto Gabilundo with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk07: Thank you. Hi, good morning. This is Felipe and Michele and good morning to all your team and thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. I have three questions from my side. The first one is on your cost of risk guidance. So given that El Nino seems to have changed to a low non-impact, how should we think about cost of risk in the first quarter of this year? You have a very strong reserve coverage ratio so just wondering if there's a possibility that at some point in 24 we can have some reversal of provisions related to El Nino. And also, when do you expect the cost of risk to normalize to historical levels? Because the cost of risk for this year, above 4.3, it continues to be high, your historical levels. Then my second question is on your NIM expectations. Want to double check if I'm correct. Can we expect NIM to behave between stable and a NIM expansion of 20 basis points this year? And also, we'd like to hear from you what should be the key drivers for NIMs in this year. I don't know if it will be the recovery long road, probably more appetite on the consumer segment after leaving behind the impact of El Nino and also lower funding costs now that we are going through this easing cycle. And the last question is on expenses. We have seen that IFS has been doing an important effort to maintain costs under control. So how should we think about OPEX growth this year? Should it be in line with inflation, a little bit above inflation? Just wanted to understand if you will continue to do investments in technology or disruptive initiatives. I also wanted to break it down of how much of the OPEX will be related to that. And also related to this question, I will also appreciate if you can share with us in which part of the P&L should we start to see the results or the benefits of all these new investments. Thank you.
spk02: Okay, thank you very much. And let me give a introduction to the answer and probably Michaela will go a little bit more detail. In terms of concept-based guidance, El Nino, actually what works well is we don't expect to have as strong rains and damage to certain infrastructure due to El Nino. However, we are living through an El Nino phenomenon. It's been the case for most of 2003 and we expect it to continue. As you see, temperature is really high. The sea temperature, the ocean temperature is also high. So even though we don't expect a strong disruption to infrastructure unless the rains are not expected now to happen strongly, do appear, that's something we can not completely rule out. The El Nino still impacts many of the industries of work in Peru, like fishing, like agriculture in certain ways. So even though, again, the rainfall, will be more moderate or not very important, we do see some disruption there. So we have to be careful when we talk about El Nino. Having said that, we do expect the second half to be better than the first half. Michaela will probably elaborate on that. Then on Nino, I think she also have some of the details. And in terms of expenses, the only thing I can tell you and she can do some of the breakdown, that what we know as management is that, what we can control is costs. And we're very focused on that. And that discipline will continue. And it's built into basic premises. Austerity in our operations, but the second premise is we continue investing in building our future. So we won't sacrifice the building of our real future for having this mindset of cost control. But do we run a very focused on austerity culture that as you can see is giving good results in terms of operating leverage. Having said that, let me pass on to Michaela, which I'm sure will give you a little bit more of detail on each of the subjects that you have raised. Thank you very much.
spk01: Thanks Felipe. Hi Ernesto, thank you for your questions. Let me go in order first with your question related to cost of risk. As you can see, the guidance that we are providing is to be below cost of risk of 2023. And if you see at the evolution of cost of risk during 2023, it has been going up during the third quarter and to a minor extent during the fourth quarter. Why is that? And we have discussed in the previous conference call specifically the consumer lending portfolio, the unsecure portion, and specifically related to the fact that with no GDP growth and sustained inflation, there has been a deterioration of the payment ability of Peruvian families. So now in the second half of 2023, we also included within the forward-looking variables of our provisions, a moderate Nino. And at the time it was something above 100 million Soles. For next year, what we are expecting is a first quarter which is still high, even with no Nino. And this is because the picking up of all the rescheduling that we have been doing during 2023, has matured a portion of it in the third quarter, fourth quarter, but we will still see some of that during the first quarter of 2024. After that, we should expect, we are expecting a downward trends in the cost of risk. And to the last question of the cost of risk part, not related to when should we see historical levels. I think we will not go down to below 3% as was pre-COVID. And this is just because of the portfolio composition. Yes, we are expecting 2025 to be a level with much lower provisions than 2024, but I wouldn't expect that number to be below pre-COVID levels. Now, let me move to NIM expectations. We are providing a guidance of above 5.5%, relatively stable NIM. And this is because there are opposing trends within NIM during 2024. There are some positive trends in that for sure, is related to cost of funds, specifically cost of funds in Soles, as rates have already started to go down. But there are also some negatives related to yield on loans. And this is coming specifically from higher percentage from commercial loans and lower percentage in the mix of consumer loans, given that we have been decreasing the portfolio in the last months of 2023. And we expect that portfolio to continue shrinking for some months in 2024. So putting all of that together, this is why we are giving a stable NIM expectation for 2024. The third part related to expenses, we are giving a guidance of a stable efficiency ratio at IFS. You know already that the efficiency ratio at IFS is particularly low at 37%. We are expecting expenses to grow mid single digit, both at the IFS and at the bank. And specifically talking about the investment and topics related to digital and financial disruption. What I can tell you there Ernesto is that the amount of investments that we do in technology and then it's very difficult to split between what is digital disruption and what is not. Because at the end of the day, all the digital investments that we are doing are related to data, the app and all our strategy, which is to become a digital bank. That amount has become like five times what it used to be five to seven years ago. Now it has remained at that level and will most likely continue to grow in the coming years. Now, where in the PNL can you see the positive or the benefits of all these digital strategies that we have been deployed? I think that it is in all of the lines of the PNL because if I start to think of all the things that we have done in digital, it has boost for sure number of clients, but it has also boost digital sales. So there you can think about more income. It has boost not only volumes because we have increased the capability to do loans both in more in retail, but also in fees because we have been able to do much more things in a digital way, fees, but also trading income. When we look at the penetration of products within the increased customer base, it has increased in most of the segments. So I would say that it is mostly related to a positive operating leverages. So more revenues coming from all the things that we are doing in digital. For sure, there is also an impact in marginal cost because all these new clients that we have brought to the bank, but also to Interseguro, to Intelligo and merchants at EasyPay, we would not have been able to do that without a digital strategy because at the same time where we have increased five times the digital investments, we have reduced the physical presence more than 40%. So when you put everything together, I think you cannot separate and analyze only what is the impact of some specific digital initiative, but is the impact of the overall digital strategy that we are deploying at IFS. And maybe just to comment a little bit more specifically on the latest investment related to payments. There, some of the things that we are monitoring very strictly and that we are pushing for is synergies with Interbank. So there the play is not only the fees that already EasyPay brings, but also all the synergies that we are creating in working, in making the ecosystem of Interbank stronger and attracting more inflows, and float to Interbank accounts. And on top of that with EasyPay, which is focused on the micro merchants, besides float and more inflows, also the possibility to start adding some new services that will provide additional fees. So let me stop there Ernesto to see whether I was able to answer the four questions.
spk07: Oh yes, thank you very much, Miquela and Miss Felipe. Just a last question in your ROE, you are getting an ROE above 12% this year, but when should we think about your medium term ROE? I think in the past you were saying that IFS sustainable ROE is around 18. So just wanted to hear from you, how are you seeing the ROE evolution in the next years? I understand this year will continue to be high in terms of cost to risk, but as you said, it could be normalizing to a cost to risk of 3% in the next years, that could be a driver. So just wondering how should we think about the ROE evolution over the next couple of years?
spk02: Sure, I think Ernesto, thanks for your question. ROE should start normalizing after 2030. So I'm not pretty sure maybe Miquela can tell us is according to our models, 2025 will already be there, but we'll be targeting that 18% medium term. So hopefully we'll be able to reach it. And it's all related to the performance of the economy. And we have done our work in terms of changing that profile of our new customer acquisition in terms of credit cards and consumer notes. However, it has to react according to how the economy goes in the future. So our base case is that starting to, 2025 will be returning to higher profitability levels. And obviously we have to pay close attention to the investment results and that will be subject to the evolution of the international capital markets. I don't know Miquela if you want to compliment something else.
spk01: At Ernesto, I mean, the cost of risk is not necessarily going down to 3%. It will go down to below 4%, but not necessarily 3.0. Somewhere between 3 and 3.5, I don't know exactly. In 2025, I mean, we could get back to the midterm ROE in 2025, actually the uncertainty there is if the bank goes back to the 17 to 18 ROE. Now, and that will depend on the speed of the recovery of the Peruvian economy, which directly impacts the consumer portfolio.
spk04: Okay, thank you very much.
spk01: You're welcome. Again,
spk04: if you have a question, please press star, then one. Our next question will come from Nicholas Riva with Bank of America, please go ahead.
spk05: Thanks very much, Miquela, Luis Felipe for taking my question. So I have a question on your tier two bonds, the ones issued at the interbank level, at the bank level. So the bank already announced that you guys are gonna be calling the outstanding of the 2029 tier two in March, just over a hundred million dollars. But you also have another tier two bond that you can call next year. The economics are quite different from the 29s, a lower coupon, a lower reset. So if you can discuss what we should expect regarding the call option on the 2030 tier twos next year. And then also earlier this year, to finance the call on the 29s, you issued a 10 non-call five tier two bond. And that's also like a legacy tier two bond in the sense that there's no coupon deferral and there's no CT one trigger for principal right. My question is, why does the bank regulator in Peru allow banks to issue, to still issue this legacy tier two bonds rather than Basel three tier twos?
spk02: Thanks Nicolás. That's a perfect question to be answered by Michaela. Go ahead, just Michaela.
spk01: Hi Nicolás, thank you for your question. Listen, first related to the tier two that will mature or will be callable during next year. It's something that we are expecting to renew for sure. Not we do need the additional $300 million sub debt for our total capital ratio. And as why the superintendency allows banks to issue all style bonds, that I wouldn't know the exact why, but what I can tell you is that, you know Peru has been for a long period of time in stage that we always describe at Basel 2.5. The latest regulation that was issued during last year brought us to Basel 2.95 to say it in some way. And the only feature that has not been implemented is the one that you're asking. So everything else has been aligned to Basel three, but the tier two bonds have remained with those characteristics. So basically the one that we issued in January is an old style, which at the end is pretty liked by the investors. And we are not sure really whether or not there is going to be additional regulation going forward, but if not, most likely the new that we will issue next year will also be in this way, unless there are news in the regulation.
spk05: Okay, understood. Miquel, I want to follow up on the prior comment. When you said we need the $300 million tier two capital from the 2030s, you mean in that sense, you mean that you expect to call that bond and to replace it with a new legacy tier two issuance?
spk01: I mean, we will need to evaluate of course, all the economics, no, but which we will need to be in closer to the call date of the bond.
spk05: Okay, I just want to ask a question on that. If you were not to call that bond, does it start losing capital treatment?
spk01: Yes, yes, yes it does, 20% per year.
spk05: Okay, thanks very much Miquel.
spk01: Thank you.
spk04: The next question will come from Carlos Gomez with HSBC, please go ahead.
spk06: Thank you very much for taking my call. Thank you Miquel, I was feeling good. I joined late and I mean, you may already have answered this, but can you tell us your views about the level of indebtedness of the SMEs and the consumers in Peru and what is a realistic outlook for credit growth, not only for this year, but for the coming two or three years? And second, during the COVID pandemic, you tried to make a push for SMEs, through the reactiva program, where do you stand there and do you have more ambitions to go into that segment?
spk02: Thank you. Okay, yeah, thank you Carlos for your question. The level of indebtedness, let me take a crack to you, to answering your question in two fronts. The first one, there's still lots of room in terms of increasing bankarization in Peru on the debt side. So I think we're still starting at 40% total loans over GDP and consumer loans is well below that. So the growth potential for the current system remains as strong as it has been in the last years. Obviously we're undergoing a negative credit cycle right now given economic conditions and the overall environment, but we know that that will pass and probably growth will return moving forward. And if that couple is coupled with the recovery of the economy, then growth will be even stronger. And the same happens for SMEs. I think one of the things in SME is the informality in Peru is an issue in order to be more aggressive. And so we are working on building digital capabilities and analytical capabilities to get to them. The push that we did during the last year and the pandemic working with Reactiva was very positive for us and allow us to learn very much about our clients in a segment that we are not really big. However, given current macro environment, we are not hereditary in terms of taking additional risk. We are very aggressive if you want in our retail portfolio. We don't need to do that in our commercial portfolio or that in your SMEs. So we do have a solid 3% market share. We are building digital capabilities and analytical capabilities to serve that market. And we've learned a lot and we see what's working with them. However, until the cycle does not turn around, we'll probably remain in our conservative approach towards SMEs. The easy pay acquisition has put us very close to merchants and that creates an avenue of growth for our customer segment that that company knows very well. And as Michaela mentioned, we are already seeing seniority. So we have good assets in terms of take a crack at that segment without disproportionately increasing risk levels. I think that's it from my side. I don't know Michaela if you want to compliment something.
spk01: The only thing I would add is that from all the new clients that we started working with during the reactiva loans, in the small business segment, we were not able to lend to many of them. I think it's somewhere below 15%, the percentage of loans that we were able to renew without the guarantee of reactiva. But what was really positive news from that was that the number of clients increased substantially in that segment and also the float with that segment, so deposits. And together with those deposits, fees coming from transfers and also trading income. So there was a side business coming from that segment with the reactiva program. And when we move upwards to the mid-size company, there the impact was even higher. We were able to replace reactiva loans there. I think it was around 40% or something like that. And also the collateral business trading income and fees was very important. And I think that that together with some other things that we have been doing in the mid-corporate segment has allowed us to reach the number three position in the market as of year end. We used to be number four, now we are number three in the market.
spk06: Thank you. You say your market share is, do you understand 3% or 13%?
spk01: No, in the small business is only 3%.
spk06: In the small business, but that's a small business, that's not the same, right?
spk01: It's a portion of both, mid-corporates plus small business, yes.
spk06: Okay. And I think my other question was in terms of, in actual numbers, yes, there is a lot of potential for growth. How much will you expect your portfolio to grow? Again, not only 24, but also 25, 26.
spk01: In that specific segment, sorry, or overall?
spk06: Both.
spk01: Okay, no, I mean, the guidance that we are giving for total loan growth for next year is mid single digit. Okay, actually we are expecting a little bit higher increase in loans in commercial banking and a little bit lower in retail banking because still the consumer portfolio will grow marginally, we believe.
spk06: Thank you so much.
spk04: At this time, we'll take the webcast questions. I would now like to turn the call over to the Inspire group. Please go ahead.
spk03: Thank you, operator. The first question comes from Daniel Mora of Credit Corp. In 2024, can we expect a stable NIM given that with the increases in rates, it remains stable at 5.5?
spk01: Let me take that, Daniel, thank you for your question. I guess we commented that before. Yes, we're providing guidance for a stable NIM, which is the result of decreasing cost of funds from the cuts in solace rates, but also some pressure in the yield on loans due to the portfolio mix and its evolution.
spk03: Thank you, and as a follow up to that, when do you expect to reach the peak in provisions and the peak in non-performing loans?
spk01: Picking provisions, we believe that the high quarters have been already the third and fourth quarter, but the first quarter of 2024 is still going to be a high cost of risk for the consumer portfolio. After that, we expect a cost of risk to start to go down and eventually normalize in the coming quarters.
spk03: The next question comes from Nancy Lopez of UP. What was the main trigger of a change on retail loans to a more expensive maintenance once?
spk01: Can you read it again, sorry?
spk03: What was the main trigger on retail loans to more expensive maintenance once?
spk01: To more expensive maintenance once, is that the question?
spk03: Yes.
spk01: Sorry. I mean, maybe if I can comment on the portfolio mix, what has been happening in the past two quarters is that consumer loans, the unsecured portion has been decreasing because of the risk profile. That is the main reason why. While we have seen a continuous growth in mortgages, in payroll deductible loans to the public sector employees, and also in commercial banking.
spk03: The next question comes from Daniel Merida of PUCP. Good morning, thanks for the presentation. Can you please give an update about your buyback program?
spk01: Sure. The buyback program was put on hold a few months ago. Actually, after the latest update that we gave during, I think it was three quarters ago, we have not pursued any additional purchases. And it is in kind of a wait and see position, given that we are now focusing more on maintaining the capital levels, given the macro outlook that changed, not dramatically, during the last half of 2023.
spk03: The next question, composed of Bank Of America. How should we think about the dividend payout ratio this year?
spk02: Hi Ernesto, I think you can hear me now, So I had some problem with my microphone. Well, it's basically our policy. You'll have to take into account 45% of the bank. And I think like 50% of the insurance company and a bit of the deli, which results are not very high. Then we take some cash into the operating company, sorry, into the holding company in order to cover expenses and debt service. So it should be, I think we're announcing it pretty soon. So you can work through the numbers. I don't know if we can tell the number right now. We still have to go through the process of IFS boards and shareholders meeting in order to prove it. But that's the way we build up our dividends and each base to remember on local government. So I work through the numbers, but we're going to actually mention it. But it's probably we'll have a dividend. So that's the news.
spk03: At this time, there are no further questions. I'd like to turn the call over to the operator.
spk04: Thank you. There appear to be no further questions at this time as well on the audio side. I would like to turn the floor back over to Ms. Katsassa for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.
spk01: OK, thank you very much. Thank you, everybody, again, for attending our call and for the questions. And we'll see each other again for our first quarter results. Thanks again. Bye bye.
spk04: This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer

This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

-

-