This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Intrepid Podash Incorporated first quarter 2024 results conference call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen only mode and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference, You may signal an operator by pressing star and zero. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ivan Mapes, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
spk04: Thank you, Rochelle. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss and review Intrepid's first quarter 2024 results. With me today is Intrepid's CFO, Matt Preston. And to be able to answer questions during the Q&A session is our VP of Sales and Marketing, Zachary Adams, and our VP of Operations, John Galassini. Please be advised that our remarks today include forward-looking statements as defined by U.S. securities laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be very different from those currently anticipated, are based on information available to us today, and we assume no obligation to update them. These risks and uncertainties are described in our periodic reports for the SEC, which are incorporated here by reference. During today's call, we referred to certain non-GAAP financial and operational measures. Reconciliation's most directly comparable gap measures are included in yesterday's press release, and along with our SEC filings, are both available on our website at IntrepidPottage.com. I'll now turn the call over to Matt.
spk02: Thank you, Evan. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate your interest in Intrepid and attendance for our first quarter earnings call. As we first announced in an April press release, our CEO, Bob Gernobis, is currently on a temporary medical leave of absence. We continue to wish Bob a speedy recovery, and while we anticipate and understand your interest, we don't have any new information to share with you today. We will, however, continue to issue updates on his recovery and status as it relates to Intrepid as we have them. Moving on to our first quarter results, our adjusted EBITDA totaled $7.7 million, a modest improvement sequentially, but down from $16.4 million in the prior year period. The key highlight in Q1 was robust demand for our fertilizer products for spring application, and we are pleased to report that our sales volumes and average net realized sales prices came in at the upper end of our guidance. For potash, we sold 74,000 tons at an average net realized sales price of $395 per ton, while for TRIO, our volumes totaled 91,000 tons at an average price of $300 per ton. Behind the strong demand, U.S. farmers have maintained their approach to yield maximization, even with key crop futures, corn and soybeans, coming back closer to historical averages. Also working to our advantage, potash pricing has seen relative stability over the past few months, which has been driven by several factors, including global potash demand returning to longer-term annual growth trends amidst a more balanced market, key international markets like Southeast Asia returning to higher potash application rates, and international crops such as palm oil, rice, cocoa, and coffee continue to trade well above historical averages. As for our first quarter segment margins in potash, our gross margin totaled $5.6 million, which compares to $14.4 million in the prior year period. The key drivers of the declining year-over-year financial performance were a combination of lower pricing and elevated unit costs due to our reduced production in the 2023-2024 production year. As we've emphasized on prior calls, improving our unit economics is a priority for Intrepid, and spreading our fixed costs across higher production will be instrumental in achieving this goal. To that extent, the recent projects we've already commissioned and will be commissioning in the coming months give us a higher degree of confidence that our potash production will be inflecting higher in the back half of this year, with increased momentum looking into the 25 production year. In TRIO, our gross deficit narrowed sequentially in the quarter to $1.1 million, but was down compared to our gross margin of $1.5 million in the prior year period, with lower pricing being the key driver of the delta. The 91,000 tons sold exceeded our expectations, with historically strong demand being supported by a number of factors, including a tight domestic sulfate market. In light of the strong demand, we increased our TRIO price by $25 per ton in the first quarter, and expect to see the continued benefits of the price increase in our Q2 realized pricing. The two new continuous miners are also driving higher operating efficiencies, which allowed us to move to a reduced operating schedule at ease, decrease our contract labor, all while maintaining our production rates. We expect to see continued benefits in our cost per ton in the second quarter as higher operating efficiencies and lower costs move through our inventory. For the full year 2024, we expect our cash production costs at East to decrease by approximately $8 to $10 million, or 12 to 15% when compared to 2023. While the segment outlook is improving, we'll continue to limit our capital investment into East and further evaluate options to improve our margins going forward. Lastly, for oilfield solutions, our segment margin of $2 million was a $1.5 million increase from the prior year. as higher water and brine sales prove increased revenues while we effectively manage our costs through decreased contract labor and fewer water purchases. For second quarter guidance, we expect our potash sales volumes to be in the range of 50 to 55,000 tons at an average net realized sales price in the range of $390 to $400 per ton. For TRIO, we expect our sales volumes to be in the range of 55 to 60,000 tons at an average net realized sales price of $310 to $315 per ton. Moving to project updates, we're excited to share that we've continued to show strong execution, and after higher levels of investment over the past two years, we're close to seeing tangible improvements to our potash production. Starting with Wendover, we started to fill Primary Pond 7 with brine, with this new pond increasing our total evaporative area by about 1.5 times. We expect the pond to be full by the end of the year, which will improve our production rates starting in 2025. At HB, the new replacement extraction well, IP30B, and phase two of the new brine injection pipeline continue to progress well. In April, we successfully drilled IP30B with commissioning expected by the end of May. This is a significant accomplishment for Intrepid and will allow us to continue to extract the already developed high-grade brine pool from the Eddy Cavern through early 2025. as we extract the brine, we'll backfill this cavern to create an additional brine pool for future production years, with IP30B serving as the long-term extraction well for the Eddy cavern. For phase two of the new injection pipeline, in April, we received the final permits necessary to operate the pipeline and expect to have this commissioned in early Q3. The new injection pipeline will allow our brine injection rates into our Eddy, North, and South caverns to be the highest in company history resulting in overall brine injection volumes that exceed our extraction volumes. This is key for increasing our brine availability and creating the necessary underground residence time to develop high-grade brine, which in turn helps sustain higher production volumes over the longer term. For the sand and lithium projects, we're still working with potential partners on various deal structures, but are committed in limiting Intrepid's capital towards these projects. And while we wrap up this period of higher capital spend, we still sit today with approximately $47 million in cash on the balance sheet and no long-term debt. To end my remarks, as fertilizer and agriculture markets look to be entering more of a mid-cycle environment, Intrepid is uniquely positioned, and we have catalysts on the horizon that should help drive value to our shareholders. First, we're only a few months away from seeing the first inflection to higher potash production. This will lead to better unit economics and allow us to fully capitalize on the many decade reserve lives of our potash assets. Second, we've taken a significant first step to improve our cost structure at the East mine with a 12 to 15% reduction in our full year cash production costs. And lastly, our debt-free balance sheet and solid liquidity puts Intrepid in a position of strength as a broader market continues to navigate higher interest rates and inflation. Operator, we're now ready for the Q&A portion of the call.
spk00: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press star one and we will pause for a moment as callers join the queue. Your first question. comes from the line of Joshua Spector with UBS. Your line is open.
spk01: Hi, yeah, this is Lucas Bowen. I'm from Josh. Just starting on potash. So your first half guide is pretty similar to what you guys did sort of last year, and it lines up really well with your production from the second half, 23. So, I mean, you had solid production in the first quarter. I was just kind of wondering what you're expecting for production in the second quarter relative to the last couple of years that have been sort of quite low. And then is that sort of a good proxy for us in terms of your volumes into the second half? So sort of, you know, that 100, 110 range, something like that.
spk02: Yeah, no, thanks for the question, Lucas. I mean, certainly Q2 volumes are always down as we enter the summer evaporation season. Wendover and HB are wrapping up right now. Moab wrapped up the season a few weeks ago. So we always see the drop down in April as we just enter that season. As far as kind of full year production, you know, we had guided on the prior call 10 to 15% higher production rates in 24 compared to 23. And we're happy report we're still really on track for that probably towards the high end of that guidance kind of 15 above 2023 volumes so we'll certainly see that benefit towards the back half of the year as we start to see those capital projects we've talked about the the eddy cavern ip30b and go back to moab cavern 4 last year really start to improve our brine grades and our production rates in in the second half of 24. yeah that's great so i mean if you i mean that probably implies about 150 production in the second half then
spk01: So you should get a sort of good step up there in your first half sales next year, you know, sort of being, get that 150 flows through sort of versus the 125 or so this year.
spk02: Yeah, certainly second half volumes can be impacted. Obviously got to get through the evaporation season, which is underway right now and can be a little affected by timing of startup, whether we start up mid-August or kind of the first week of September. But yeah, this is, as I said, kind of 15% above those 23 rates. We feel like we're, We're seeing the progress we hope to see here in the first quarter.
spk01: Great. Now, I guess just on the pricing side, so, I mean, you're expecting sort of flat pricing sequentially there. I mean, the benchmark prices have sort of started to come off a little bit. What are you guys, I guess, what's kind of driving your order book versus sort of where the market is and what sort of a seasonal reset are you expecting this year? Should we say sort of more of one in the third quarter or are you expecting sort of more mild seasonality this year?
spk03: Yeah, this is Zach here. So I think we see the global market as being very balanced and stable right now. You know, certainly there's always some seasonal price movements that you see as you kind of exit the application season and you go into that period of the summertime frame where where buyers kind of look to, you know, in season empty on inventory and kind of work on the timing of kind of when they're going to refill their positions ahead of the fall season. You know, as it relates to kind of second half, I think we're optimistic about demand there. You know, we think the prospect of ending the spring season empty on inventory will continue. And we think, you know, buyers will be ready to step in at some point this summer for volumes. And the crop economics today still support you know, our customers and farmers looking to maximize yields, so we think that's a positive bellwether for volumes in the second half and stable pricing going forward.
spk01: All right, thanks. I'll get back in the queue. Thanks.
spk00: The next question comes from Joel Jackson with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk05: Good audible there on the name. Okay, on TRIO, like your Q1 volume, sales volume is, I think, the best quarter you've ever done for a TRIO in any quarter as a public company. Pricing looks like it's rising a bit in Q2, whereas potash price looks stable. And your TRIO volume, guys, pretty good for Q2 as well. So if you talk about tapping in TRIO, it seems like you're getting really good uptake on it, value and volume.
spk02: Yeah, I'll let Zach touch on the volumes. You're right, it was record domestic sales there in Q1, but Zach, go ahead.
spk03: Yeah, no, thanks, Joel. Yeah, I think what we saw on the volume side was, you know, our customers entered the year with very low channel inventories on site. And, you know, across, you know, several regions in the U.S., we saw an early application period. So that really led to seeing some volumes that, you know, typically might transact in April, let's call it, kind of be pulled forward into March, excuse me. And so, you know, even with that, I mean, overall first half volumes look strong for us. And, you know, and Frio compared to Potash always has a little bit more of a tail on the application season to it, just because it's used in some side dress and top dress applications that kind of go out through late May into early June. So we expect to see good subscription really through the end of the second quarter. And certainly we've seen that quarter to date so far.
spk05: Okay, just on that Potash question, production clarification. So not that my model's right, but I have that you were expecting about a 13% increase in production in 24 and 23% production increase in 25. You're talking about 22% increase now. Is that the 24, 25 is my model, right? Or are things going a bit better than you thought? Or am I wrong?
spk02: Yeah, I'll go back to what we said on our Q4 call, which was a 10 to 15% increase in 2024 and another 15 to 20% in 25. As I was telling Lucas, I think we're closer to the 15% increase for 2024 right now. You know, we haven't given change really anything on 2025. That's still a ways out. But, you know, certainly 2024 volumes look very good and towards the higher end of that guidance.
spk07: Okay. I think that's my question. Thank you. Thanks.
spk00: The next question comes from the line of Jason . of Bumbershoot Holdings. Your line is open.
spk06: Hi, Matt. Thanks for taking the questions and nice to see the solid start to the year. Just grateful to you for deciding to stay, although wish it was obviously under better circumstances and hoping for Bob to have a full recovery and be back soon. On the potash side, I guess with the CapEx and IP30B sounding as if it's kind of reaching a conclusion, you know, you kind of mentioned seeing the progress we hope to see. It feels like kind of passed through the gauntlet with everything. Just qualitatively, I guess, at this point, what would be kind of the biggest hurdles to getting there? Or is it just at this point kind of slowly letting confidence build up and timing that, you know, things are all on the right track right now with the potash side?
spk02: Yeah, I mean, you're right, Jason. We certainly, you know, getting the IP30B well drilled, we're just completing kind of surface commissioning today. So kind of through the bulk of that capital spend and obviously where we ran the issues with IP30A. So it's so great to have that behind us. You know, it's obviously there's variability in a lot of our evaporation seasons. We've seen that over the years. And we need to continue to, you know, control our costs and execute on the projects in front of us. We'll see how the HB IP30B continues, as well as Moab Cavern 4, as well as the additional work we've done in Cavern 3. But I don't want to give the impression that we can sit back and sort of rest on our laurels now. We continue to stay focused on the project execution, kind of this two-year plan we've been on to get our production rates back to historical levels. And so, yeah, good progress so far, but still lots of work to be done. really get through this evaporation season. Hopefully we can give some, some better guidance towards the back half of the year and into the spring of 25. Okay.
spk06: And then got a couple of questions on the, I guess, volume side of the production, just maybe on the, on the cost side of production, if you could just remind us what you, assuming that it continues to make the progress, what you guys have been saying, and just, I guess at this point with a lot of the heavier listing behind you, you know, is there increasing confidence that the cost side of things is kind of lining up with where you guys were hoping?
spk02: Yeah, certainly as we see those production volumes materialize, we'll see an improvement in our unit costs. Certainly had a great first quarter for potash, around $350 per ton. That was probably a benefit a little bit for more sales out of our Utah facilities, which are at a lower per ton cost. So not sure we'll be quite there in the Q2, but As we continue to see more production tons in the ponds, we still expect to see a pretty equivalent improvement in our per ton cost. So if we're 10% to 15% improvement in production, 24% versus 23%, we'll see an equivalent improvement in our per ton cost as well.
spk07: Okay.
spk06: And then just, I guess, sitting here today, I obviously hope Bob is back, but just, I guess, from your perspective, maybe you could try to frame – I guess where the company over the next year or so might be headed. Obviously, having the cash on the balance sheet, you already spent a pretty good portion of this year's CapEx. Sand and lithium both sound like they're kind of coming together. So I guess, in your mind, what's the most important kind of thing besides the execution to focus on of where the company should be heading?
spk02: I mean, I think it's just that. It's the continued execution of the strategy. I mean, we've been talking about this for really the last two years now, getting our potash production back to the historic levels where it needs to be. You know, that path has been set for a while, and, you know, it's very clear what everyone needs to work on, from the capital projects we finished to the ones we're continuing to wrap up here in Q2. You know, the direction has been clear, and it's really unchanged going forward.
spk07: Okay, great. Appreciate the commentary. Thanks.
spk00: This concludes the question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Matt Preston for any closing remarks.
spk02: Thanks everyone for your interest and look forward to talking to everyone again soon. Have a nice day.
Disclaimer