KNOT Offshore Partners LP Common Units representing Limited Partner Interests

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us and welcome to the Knopp fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session with an opportunity for equity research analysts to ask questions. If you'd like to ask a question, please raise your hand. If you have dialed into today's call, please press star nine to raise your hand and star six to unmute when prompted. I will now hand the conference over to Derek Lowe. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Tyler, and good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Derek Lowe, and I'm the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Knott Offshore Partners. Welcome to the partnership's earnings call for the fourth quarter of 2025. Our website is knottoffshorepartners.com, and you can find the earnings release there along with this presentation. On slide two, you will find guidance on the inclusion of forward-looking statements in today's presentation. These are made in good faith and reflect management's current views, known and unknown risks, and are based on assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements. and the Parlour does not have or undertake the duty to update any such forward-looking statements made as of the date of this presentation. For further information, please consult our SEC filings, especially in relation to our annual and quarterly results. Today's presentation also includes certain non-US gap measures, and our earnings release includes a reconciliation of these to the most directly comparable gap measures. We begin on slide 3 with a comment on the unsolicited and non-binding offer from our sponsor, KNOT, to buy the publicly owned common units for $10 per common unit, which we received during the fourth quarter. As announced in a press release on March 19th, the mutual decision was made by the independent KNOP Conflicts Committee and the sponsor to conclude those discussions with no transaction recommended. All information provided by KNLB's conflicts committee about that process was included within the March 19th press release, and I'll not be able to comment any further during today's call. On slide four, we have the Q4 financial and operational headlines, certain of which reflect the impact of the non-cash impairment related to the Baird organisation. Revenues were $96.5 million. Operating income was $8.4 million on a fully reported basis, or $28.6 million. when excluding the impact of the impairment on Bodal. Similarly, net income on a fully reported basis was a loss of $6.2 million, whereas it was net income of $14 million when we exclude the impact of the impairment. Adjusted EBITDA was $59.3 million. And as of December 31st, 2025, we had $137 million in available liquidity, made up of $89 million in cash and cash equivalents, plus $48 million in under-owned capacity on our credit facilities, and that was $11.8 million higher than September 30th. We operated with 99.5% utilisation, taking into account the scheduled dry docking of Sinovac and Ipsen, which amounts to 96.4% utilisation overall. Following the end of Q4, we declared a cash distribution of 2.6 US cents per common unit, which was paid in February. On slide five, we have the developments during Q4. Early in the quarter, we entered into a 71.1 million senior secured term loan facility to refinance the Nova Knudsen. On November 4th, the Vigdis Knudsen transitioned from a time charter contract to a bare boat charter with the same customer, Shell, extending until at least 2030. We completed our second of two RCF refinancings rolled over on similar terms. Our next refinancings are in the late third and early fourth quarter of this year. And on November 21st, we agreed the time charter for Fort Laser Knudsen with KMOT to commence during the second quarter of 2026 and lasting between one and three years. Given the vessel's smaller size relative to the Suezmax that has become standard in the Brazilian offshore segment, the vessel is expected to transition to the much more diversified North Sea. Then on slide six, the principles of elements in the first quarter has been the termination of discussions around the offer from KNRT, which I described earlier. Turning to slide seven for a high-level summary of our positive momentum coming into the spring of 2026 with the tightening market and expanding backlog and the balance sheet continuing to strengthen. In both Brazil and the North Sea, we continue to see tightening markets, driven by FPSO startups, ramp-ups, expansions, new discoveries, and in a number of cases, technology-driven increases in production beyond mainplate capacity. In each instance, these increased volumes are the outcome of lengthy, often capex-intensive projects, such that there are not typically sudden, unanticipated step changes in shuttle tanker demand that catch the market off guard. Nevertheless, the increase in shuttle tanker service volumes across both markets has been both sustained and sufficient to tighten the supply-demand balance. Petrobras will continue to deploy its long-committed pipeline of FPSOs and to expand production capacity across its existing fleet. We've sustained our backlog as of December 31, 2025, with a $929 million of fixed contracts averaging 2.6 years and rather more if all the options are exercised. At year end, our fleet of 19 vessels had an average age of 10.2 years. We are continuing to repay debt at $90 million or more per year, which we think is prudent with a depreciating asset base. Having reliably addressed our refinancing needs, typically on very consistent terms, we now look to a $220 million five-ship facility in September 2026 and a $65 million single-ship facility in October 2026, secured by Lever Knudsen. Over slides 9 to 12, we provide the financials for Q4, the highlights of which we have covered already. On slide 13 is our debt maturity profile, on which you can see we have material repayment obligations later this year. While no guarantees can be made, we have historically benefited from our access to a wide pool of lenders, attractive bank finance and several key lender relationships with major players. Moreover, we've been encouraged by our refinancing experiences in recent years and the strong signal they provide regarding lenders' continued appetite. Notably, the average margin on our floating rate debt during the fourth quarter was 2.2% over SOFA. Moving on to slide 15 of our charter portfolio, I've covered most of the updates here. But I believe this is a very useful resource for investors looking to track the primary movements where a change can occur in a highly stable portfolio of cash flows. That is when charters turn over and when there are dry docks that will cause our fire and incurrence of capex costs. Based on current charter rates, we believe charter options are likely to be taken up given the strength of the charter market. On slide 16, you can see our strong coverage through the coming quarters. Some charterers' options that market conditions suggest have a good likelihood of being exercised and a small amount of open time. In all, we have 93% of vessel time in 2026 covered by fixed contracts and 69% in 2027. If all relevant options are exercised, this rises to 98% in 2026 and 88% in 2027. On slide 17, you can see the drop-down inventory held at the sponsor. Dropdowns have been the route to growth in the fleet throughout the life of the partnership and are the means of replenishing and rejuvenating the fleet given the depreciation in our assets. I would underscore both that our board has consistently acknowledged the importance of dropdowns for the partnership and also that any consummated dropdown would first have to be approved by the Independent Conflicts Committee. On slides 18 to 20, we include again some commentary from Petrobras, with relevant highlights from a five-year plan they have released for 2026 through to 2030, as well as a useful overview of their significant 2025 progress from their recently reported full-year 2025 results. We believe that these materials from Petrobras provide a useful insight into the Brazilian offshore market, and we'd encourage you to review the extensive materials that Petrobras regularly publishes. In short, though, from the shuttle tanker owner's perspective, PetroRef continues to deploy significant capex into a long-term FPSO pipeline in shuttle tanker service areas to find new ways to increase volumes from existing fleet and overall to continue expanding its aggregate production on time or in a number of instances ahead of schedule. As with the development we're seeing in the North Sea, this gives us comfort that shuttle tanker demand should readily absorb the current order book. Further, we believe that the current order book still trends towards a medium-term shortage of shuttle tankers when set against the forthcoming production. To summarise on slide 21, during Q4, we had strong utilisation and financial results. We refinanced the Sonoba Knutson facility and the second RCF. We secured additional charter cover and paid a quarterly distribution. And in Q1, we've seen the termination of the discussions around the offer from KNOT. With that, I'll hand the call back to Tyler for any questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session, which is open to equity research analysts. If you'd like to ask a question, please raise your hand now. If you have dialed in to today's call, please press star 9 to raise your hand and star 6 to unmute. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. And your first question comes from the line of Frederick Dubois with Fernley Securities. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. You can't hear me well. Hello. Can you hear me?

No, Frederick, can't hear you that well.

Okay, it is better.

Just do try us, yeah.

I'm going to have to speak a bit loud. So, yeah, congratulations. Good quarter. Solid cash flow. You're doing a good thing. Smartly, as I say, very firm. Since last time around, I have noted that the Knutson in the holding, on the holding level, issued a bond. In connection with that bond issue, has there been a valuation of KNOP?

To repeat for anyone who didn't hear that clearly, Frederick, I think you're referring to the TSSI bond, which is, I think, two corporate levels above K&OP. I think anyone interested in the circumstances around that bond would need to look at the offering materials and the disclosure related to it there. I'm not directly aware of evaluation exercises on K&OP, at least as far as the partnership was directly involved. But the offering materials will contain the disclosure related to that transaction.

Okay, got it. Thank you. And I also noticed that you reduced the useful life of your vessels from 23 to 20 years. Could you change the life on the Russian island? I thought it was a bit, you know, surprised me a bit.

Yes, so useful life is a measure of how long a vessel is expected to stay in the hands of a current owner. So it's not directly a measure of the economic life of a vessel per se. So in some instances, we see sharp tankers being deployed commercially beyond 20 years. but quite often it's outside the sector. So it's conventional floating storage or FPSO. What we are seeing is the typical scenario is clients will... wish to see vessels that are under 20 years and we'll seek those out before seeking to contract those that are older. And so it's a judgment around that overall situation, particularly operation in shuttle tanker form that led us to take that view that 20 years was a better judgment on that than 23.

Okay, thank you. And this is a bit limited visibility just for my own modelling. What do you price a new building to make that currently on a shuttle tanker?

I think that's too commercially sensitive for us to disclose at the moment. We don't discuss our new build contract pricing.

Not necessarily yours, but generically, how much would it cost to build a shuttle tanker in, for instance, China?

Well, given that our sponsors are quite active in the new build space, I think generically and commercially specifically are pretty much the same thing, so I don't have any comments on it, I'm afraid.

Okay, so around 140 million would be fair from my end.

As I said, I don't have any direct comments on that, I'm afraid.

Okay. Just a final one. Sorry, I said a bit of saturated on the question side, but... last one um back in 2023 when you kept the dividend uh you could i i can quote you that you said that until you have re-established a greater degree of over visibility and on earnings and on liquidity uh the quarterly distribution is uh it's reduced but will be increased once this is in place and hearing what you are saying now on the output for Tesla tankers, your balance is rock solid, and you're generating a significant cash flow over the quarter. What will it take for the dividend to come back when it seems like everything is in place for it to happen?

Yeah, thank you. Capital allocation is very much in the minds of directors on a continual basis, and whether it's distributions, buybacks, or investment in the fleet, so drop-downs, that's something that they're assessing on a continual basis and will continue to do so. We don't have a direct... formula that says there's a given time for one or other of those aspects to be selected, but it does remain under active review by the directors.

So would you say that your view on dividend distributions is changed from 2022 to today, or is it the same the way you look at it?

Well, we're clearly pleased with a stronger financial position now than back then. That's certainly the case. But the choice of how and when to allocate capital is something, as I say, that the directors keep under continual review.

Okay. I understand. I understand. I appreciate your comments, Derek. Final question. You tried to do the annual general meeting last year about the success. Are you going to schedule it again, for this year, or how should we think about that?

Well, we do obviously have a standing obligation to seek to hold a meeting each year, and we intend to satisfy that obligation during 2026 as well. Thank you.

That's it for me.

Thank you. Next question. Apologies. Your next question comes from the line of Liam Burke with B. Reilly Securities. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi, Derek. How are you today?

Hi, Liam. Good. Thanks.

And you?

I'm fine, thank you. Whatever happened to two questions per customer? Anyway, you've got a – your sponsor has quite a list of drop-downs, which create a nice opportunity considering you've got a very healthy end market there. Could you give us a sense on how you're prioritizing or any kind of timing or how you're thinking about adding vessels to the fleet?

That alludes to the capital allocation topic that we discussed just now. So directors are well aware of a range of potential deployments of capital whether it's distributions buybacks or drop downs and they will keep that continually in mind noting the financial position of the partnership and also the outlet from a chartering point of view as well. So there's no direct formula as to which of those will be chosen, which combination, and when, and so on.

Okay, that's fair. But, I mean, we're looking at your liquidity position strengthening. Your operating cash flow is up 13.5% this year. You've had a long history of successfully refinancing balloon payments, and those balloon payments are coming down, as we saw in one of the slides. So, I mean – How would we end drop-downs in this market look to be very good, considering we're looking at the long-term contracts? Is there any priority to the drop-downs vis-a-vis dividends or accelerated debt repayment?

No, there's no working priority as between those different places that capital could be allocated. Okay. The directors look at all of them at the same time.

Great. Okay. Thank you, Derek.

Great. Thanks, Ben.

Okay, and there are no further questions at this time, so I will turn it back to Derek for closing remarks.

Thank you, Tyler, and thank you all again for joining this earnings call for the KMOT Offshore Partners Talk Quarter in 2025. I look forward to speaking with you again following the first quarter results.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.