This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: which could cause actual results to differ materially. These risk factors are listed in the company's various SEC filings, including the 2022 annual report on form 10K, which should be reviewed carefully. The company has a form 8K with the Securities and Exchange Commission that contains the press release announcing its fourth quarter results. Kinsale's management may also reference certain non-GAP financial measures in the call today. A reconciliation of GAP to these measures can be found in the press release, which is available on the company's website at .kinsalecapitalgroup.com. I will now turn the conference over to Kinsale's president and CEO, Mr. Michael Kehoe. Please go ahead, sir.
spk10: Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Brian Petticelli, our CFO, and Brian Haney, our president and CEO, and I will each offer a few remarks, and then we'll move on to any questions you may have. In the fourth quarter of 2023, Kinsale's operating earnings per share increased by 49%, and gross written premium grew by .8% over the fourth quarter of 2022. For the quarter, the company posted a combined ratio of .1% and posted an operating ROE of .8% for the full year 2023. The company's strategy of disciplined ENS underwriting and technology-enabled low costs drive these results and allows us to make effective returns and to take market share from competitors at the same time. Specifically for those newer to the company, Kinsale focuses exclusively on the ENS market, being on writing smaller accounts. We provide our brokers with the broadest risk appetite and the best customer service in the business, and we use our low expense ratio to offer our customers competitively priced insurance while also delivering -in-class margins to our stockholders. Since much of this expense advantage is predicated on our advanced systems and our team of world-class technology professionals, we believe the competitive advantage of our technology model not only has durability to it, but has the potential to become even more powerful in the years ahead. As we have noted over the last several years, the ENS market continues to benefit from the inflow of business from standard companies and from rate increases driven by inflation and relatively tight underwriting conditions. Our growth in the fourth quarter was similar to the third and was largely consistent with the industry commentary about the property market becoming more orderly. We continue to be optimistic about growth in 2024. Finally, a reminder about our reserving process and approach. We collect premiums upfront and pay claims out over the subsequent several years. Accordingly, we post reserves now for claims we will have to pay in the future. We deliberately set those reserves in a conservative fashion. We set aside more than we think we will need to allow for some uncertainty in the process, the possibility of a changing tort system and the uptick of inflation we have experienced more recently in the last couple of years. Our 2016 through 19 accident years have developed favorably on an -to-date basis, but the level of conservatism in those years has been partially eroded by inflation. As a consequence of 2019, we have benefited from very significant rate increases above the watch-cost trend, and we have used some of that additional rate to add to the level of conservatism in our reserves. Investors should have a high level of confidence in the Conselhe balance sheet as we expect overall reserves to continue to develop favorably in the years ahead. And with that, I'm gonna turn the call over to Brian Petticelli.
spk02: Thanks, Mike. Another solid quarter with .8% growth in written premium, very low cat activity and net income and net operating earnings increasing by .7% and .6% respectively. The .1% combined ratio for the quarter included 2.3 points from net favorable prior year loss reserve development compared to 3.2 points last year and negligible cat losses in either period. The expense ratio continues to benefit from higher seating commissions from the company's casualty and commercial property proportional reinsurance agreements as a result of growth in both of those lines of business. The expense ratio can bounce around a bit from quarter to quarter, so we believe it's best to evaluate the components of the expense ratio over a 12-month period. For the year, we noted that the expense ratio decreased by 1.4 points from .2% in 2022 to .8% this year. Breaking this decrease down a little further, 1.2 points came from net commissions with the remaining 0.2 point from other underwriting expenses. On the investment side, net investment income increased by .2% over the fourth quarter last year as a result of continued growth in the investment portfolio generated from strong operating cash flows and higher interest rates with a gross return of 4% for the year compared to 3% last year. We're continuing to invest new money and shorter duration securities with new money yields averaging in the low to mid 5% range, and duration decreased at 2.8 years down from three and a half years at the end of last year. And lastly, diluted earnings per share continues to improve and was $3.87 per share for the quarter compared to $2.60 per share last year with that
spk09: I'll pass it over to Brian Haney. Thanks, Brian. As mentioned earlier, premium grew 34% in the fourth quarter and 42% for the year. We continue to see growth across our book of business with particularly strong growth in our property divisions along with entertainment, general casualty, excess casualty and commercial auto divisions. Submission growth continues to be strong and actually experienced a bit of an acceleration to the mid 20s for the quarter. This number is subject to some variability, but in general we use submissions as a leading indicator of growth. And so we see the submission growth rate as a positive signal. We sell a wide array of products and the rates in those products don't move up in lockstep, but if we pull it down to one number, we see real rates being up around 5%. Pleasing that we've been increasing rates above loss cost trend for several years now. And it's also important to stress that our rate change and rate adequacy are two different things. As our results demonstrate, our rates are more than adequate. We're continually reviewing our rates, adjusting them based on a number of considerations such as our target return on equity, the market opportunity and shifts in the competition. But in any event, we feel that business we're putting on the books today is the most adequately priced business we've seen in our history. Another thing I'd like to note, we've seen in industry commentary a trend that some companies are seeing generally favorable development on workers comp that's offsetting to some extent adverse development in general liability. Just as a reminder, KinSale doesn't write any workers comp and general liability represents the largest share of our reserves. So when you see KinSale having favorable development, you should know that this is a result of diligently staying ahead of the trends in the general liability market and it does differentiate us somewhat in the industry. That being said, the notable industry trend of weakness in general liability reserves goes well for us and may serve to prolong the favorable market conditions. Finally, inflation is moderated, somewhat from a ties, but getting the inflation rate to the feds target is proving to be a much longer effort than many prognosticators and forecasts. The longer the elevated inflation persists, the more pressure the industry will see on reserves, particularly on longer tail lines. We are dedicated to staying vigilant about this so that we may continue to have reserves that are more likely to develop favorably than adversely. Overall, once again, a good quarter and we're really happy with the results. And with that, I'll hand it back over to Mike. Thanks, Brian.
spk10: Operator, we're ready for any questions in the queue.
spk01: Thank you. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press the star key followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one a second time. And we will pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. And we will take our first question from Bill Harkacci with Wolf Research. Your line is open.
spk04: Thank you. Good morning. I wanted to follow up on your comments about the conservatism implicit in your reserving. I was hoping you could offer a little bit more color on the loss emergence trends that you're seeing from that sort of 2019 and prior accident year period, particularly in this environment where as you described, some carriers are experiencing adverse development. And along those lines are latency effects associated with core closures during COVID resulting in tail elongation. Just curious how much that remains in focus.
spk05: Bill, this is Mike.
spk10: In general, I would say that there was some disruption with regards to the pandemic. It varies dramatically by accident year and by line of business. I mean, there's a level of complexity there that I think would preclude us from getting into too much detail on a conference call. But in general, I would say that Kinsale has done a good job over our, you know, this is our 15th accident year in business. And I think we've done a really good job in setting aside conservative reserves, not every single year, but effectively, I think 13 to the 14 prior years have developed favorably on an inception to date basis. So, you know, hopefully investors look at that track record of conservatism. You know, as we just talked about, we've been adding, raising our rates ahead of loss cost trend for a number of years in a row now. And that's given us the opportunity to add even more conservatism. I think the conservatism is warranted with the uptick in inflation in general, but, you know, changes in tort law and social inflation, et cetera. I mean, there's all sorts of reasons for caution. And I just think it's important for our investors to understand that Kinsale is very proactive and very conservative in setting aside reserves today to pay clients in the future.
spk04: That's helpful, Mike, thank you. And, you know, I understand you're probably limited in what you can say about that court judgment described in the AK that you filed at the end of last year, but, you know, following the thought process that you just described at a high level, as we sort of think about social inflation pressures and the risk that those could prove more pervasive in coming years than might have been contemplated at the time that the business was written, you feel like the conservatism, you know, that you contemplated from the outset sort of protects you from that dynamic?
spk10: Yeah, in a nutshell, yes. I would say, you know, we can't get into talking about that specific claim because, you know, it's active litigation, but we said in the AK, you know, we didn't think it would have a material adverse effect. Adequate provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements and existing reserves to account for any liability of the company related to claims such as this legal proceeding. I would say in general, you know, there's been a lot of commentary over the last couple years about social inflation. Some of that probably picks up this concept of nuclear verdicts and, you know, there has been a dramatic uptick. Can sales in E&S company, and we make frequent use of coverage limitations to help us control our exposure to loss. We also tend to focus on smaller accounts, which probably insulates us a little bit. And I think, you know, we run a very disciplined underwriting operation. We've got really good systems, which translates into robust data to manage profitability. So it's something that creates, I think, a challenge for the industry, but I think in sales very good at staying ahead of, you know, changes in the torque system. And added to, you know, when you add to that, the conservatism and how we approach reserving, again, I think investors should have a lot of confidence
spk04: in the concealed balance sheet. Understood, that's really helpful, Mike. Thank you. If I could squeeze in one last one, are you considering, for Brian, are you considering extending duration as the debate around the timing of Fed cuts continues? And maybe you could just frame how investors should be thinking about potential downside risk to earnings from a lower rate environment broadly.
spk02: Yeah, I mean, we certainly are, keep up with what's going on from an interest rate perspective and an inflation perspective. I think, you know, in the near term, we're probably gonna continue to invest in that three-year timeframe, but hey, it's something we look at every month and every quarter in working with our investment teams to ensure that we're taking, you know, being opportunistic, but being aware of a role of a risk and what have you. Very helpful,
spk04: thank you for taking my questions. Thanks, Bill.
spk01: And we will take our next question from Mike Zuremski with BMO. Your line is open.
spk05: Hey,
spk07: good morning. Maybe we can just start on, you mentioned this submission increased, a bit into the mid-20s. I know there's some variability you cited on that, but any other there, I feel like insurance investors have been grappling with a potential uptick in flow on the casualty side, given social inflationary pressures impacting everyone kind of maybe more than offset or offset by less property flow, to the extent property's gotten a lot of price and the wind doesn't blow too tough in 24, but any color would be helpful.
spk09: Yeah, I
spk07: mean,
spk09: one thing to note is the growth rate of the index has been relatively steady. So I think if you go back and read the commentary, it's been in that 20, low 20s range and slightly accelerated range. I think it just so happened, there was a little more acceleration this quarter. That could just be volatility. I would agree that we are seeing, I think, continued casualty submission in flow, which is probably stemming from some of the reserve issues that some of the other competitors are having. So, and you're right, Mike mentioned that the property market's more orderly, but we are still seeing a strong flow of submissions. It's just, there's more capacity and it's just, it's a little less distressed than it was last year.
spk07: Okay, on the comments about your technology and how your technology is evolving, it could become more powerful. How would that translate into KPIs we see as investors? Would you potentially get more submissions or just be able to act more quicker on the submissions or do you feel like it would just allow you to price risk better or all the above or any color would be great?
spk05: Well, I think one
spk10: of the, Mike, this is Mike. One of the interesting things about technology is it impacts multiple areas of the business in a material way. So can it speed up customer service? Absolutely. Can it allow us to incorporate more third-party data in how we evaluate an individual risk and segment and price risk and drive a more accurate underwriting model? Absolutely. Can it help us increase the productivity of our workers effectively lowering our expenses? Absolutely. Yeah, I mean, it's, you know, for all these reasons and probably others, it's the reason we prioritize that the way we have over the years and continue to make an enormous commitment. I mean, I think about 20, maybe slightly over 20% of our headcount is in our IT department. And I think that just anecdotally speaks to how important we think it is to our business model. And, you know, having made technology a core competency of our business 15 years ago when we started the company alongside of underwriting and claim handling, I think it just puts us in a very interesting position today compared to a lot of companies in the industry that maybe aren't quite
spk07: as far along. Okay, got it. I feel like, yeah, you've been talking about it a lot, but I guess you haven't been willing to say it could kind of decouple your long-term thoughts on growth because I know the company still expects growth over the long-term to decline along with the marketplace. Lastly, just quickly on your commentary. So I believe you made the comments in your prepared remarks, Mike, that you added some reserves, some conservatism, which seems prudent in light of higher inflation levels. I don't know if I understand that correctly. When we see the statutory data, are we gonna see some topping off of certain action years or anything you were trying to tell us there?
spk10: Well, I was really speaking more toward a general management approach to the business, which is recognizing that ours is an uncertain business to some extent. There's all sorts of quantitative methods that we use to drive more certainty, but there is an element of uncertainty and we collect premiums upfront, we pay the claims over a number of years. And so I think it's just prudent to be as cautious as possible within reason in terms of setting aside dollars today to pay claims in the future. When inflation picked up, that wasn't really anticipated, I don't know by anybody, but certainly not by us. And so I do think that had a negative impact in the level of conservatism from a couple of those years. But I wasn't really speaking to anything specifically, but we're gonna file our case soon and our stat statement soon thereafter. And there's a lot of very granular information that people can look at in terms of reserves by accident year and by statutory line of business.
spk07: Okay, but just to be clear, I think in the past you said that every year it's developed favorably, or most of your years. So are you saying we might see something a little bit different, like as many we'll see probably for many peers and when you file the case?
spk10: Wait, our 2011 year developed adversely. It was the first full year we were in business and the company was tiny. I think our losses at the end of 2011 were 12.4 million and it's developed up to 15. So it's, yes, we had one bad year, but in general it's immaterial. The last several years, I think it was Brian Haney made the comments about the fact that we've been getting great increases ahead of loss cost trend. So again, these are the most conservatively reserved years in our company's history. And it coincides with the market becoming a little bit tighter, if you will. Insurance companies having more pricing power. So in that favorable pricing environment, yeah, we leaned into it and grew our business in a pretty dramatic fashion. But the reserves reflect, the net of all this is I think our reserves are
spk07: in a great spot. Okay, got it. Thanks for bearing with me. Thank you.
spk01: We'll take our next question from Mark Hughes with Truist. Your line is open.
spk06: Yeah, thank you. Good morning. The expense ratio, quite good in the quarter, below 20%. With the mix of business you have now, I know you mentioned, I guess the seating commission's 120 dips and better acquisition costs. I assume that's the seating commission's. Is 20% a good bogey given the current mix, et cetera, for 2024?
spk02: Mark, I think that's consistent with what I said. I think looking at the expense ratio over the 12 month period probably gives you a very good indication of where we expect to be going forward.
spk06: Yeah. Was there anything else, anything in the fourth quarter that was unusual? I hear what you're saying, but trying to recall whether the fourth quarter has some seasonality that makes it lower than the full year.
spk02: No, I would say quarter to quarter, there's always gonna be a little bit of variability, but there wasn't anything in particular to note in Q4.
spk06: Understood. And then the seated premiums, .5% is, I assume that goes along with your property exposure. If a casualty maybe outgrows property a little bit in coming periods, should that come down or what's some rough thoughts there?
spk10: Yeah, Mark, it's Mike. The mix of business is always gonna impact that. We buy a little more reinsurance on the property side because of some of the volatility that goes with certain accounts that are exposed to natural catastrophe and we buy more reinsurance when we put up larger limits. So our excess casualty book, the primary policy is we typically keep net.
spk05: Yeah,
spk06: yeah. And then Brian Haney talked about the accelerating submission, would that be accompanied by a little more pricing? Are you pushing a little bit more on the rate in this environment?
spk09: It's not gonna affect how we look at pricing. We are pushing pricing up, but that's less to do with the submission flow and more to do with kind of optimizing the wealth building. So we're taking into account all the market conditions and what the competitors are doing and coming up by a line with where we're gonna push rates. So I know going from 20 to low 20s to 25 would not affect how we rate the
spk06: business. And then just a final question. Property is more orderly, is it as attractive now? Pricing still seems like it's going up and if it was attractive last quarter, still is attractive now. How are you looking at your appetite for property given your current mix and the price level?
spk09: Well, I guess I would say, this is Brian Haney, I would say that prices are still going up. So it's more attractive than it was last year when it was less orderly. So we
spk05: still see a great opportunity in property. Excellent, thank you.
spk01: As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, press star one and we will take our next question from Andrew Anderson with Jeffries, your line is open.
spk03: Hey, good morning. Maybe going back to pricing and competitive positioning, trying to think about the underlying loss ratio from 21 to 24 and how I've been thinking about Kinsell over the past couple of years is you haven't had to compete much on pricing and I suppose one way of looking at that is the bound policy to issue quote ratio, which hasn't moved much. So it sounds like if you're not competing more in a relative position with pricing versus peers, we could still see flat underlying loss ratios into next year. Is that a fair way to think about the competitive market and underlying margins?
spk10: Andrew, this is Mike. I would probably take issue with the idea that we don't compete on price. I mean, we buy in 10, 12%, I think it varies a little bit by line of business, but we buy in 10 or 12% of our new business quotes. And I would say price is the biggest driver. You know, it's a huge concern to our customers. You know, it's clearly the last few years have been a little bit more of a seller's market, so that's given us the ability to raise rates and at the same time grow the top line at a really good clip. But you know, you're not completely divorced from sensitivity around price. So, you know, it's still a competitive business in terms of where loss ratios could go from here. I mean, we don't really forecast that publicly, but you know, if you take into account all the information we're providing, I think you can probably come up with a good guesstimate.
spk03: Okay, and in the context of submission flows and maybe rate coming down a little bit in property from some industry data, just trying to get an idea of the average premium in property versus casualty. And you know, if you were to lose some property business because of the pricing dynamic, does the casualty transaction flow over weight that because the average premium there would be higher? I
spk09: would say the average premium for property depending on what sort of property we're talking about, commercial property would have a relatively high average premium, but our small property team, our high value homeowners team, our personal insurance book all have relatively low average premiums. I don't, I wouldn't anticipate a huge impact from, you know, I mean, the market is becoming more orderly, but I don't think it's, you know, it's not a dramatic effect. It's just, it just explains why the property growth rate went from a very, very large number in the fourth quarter of 2022 to a still large, but less large number in the fourth quarter of 2023.
spk03: Thank you. And Mike, maybe just one clarification. You mentioned Accineer 16 to 19 favorable inception to date. Just want to be clear that is on both a consolidated basis, but also on a general liability slash casualty basis as well. And it's not, you know, over. That's on a
spk10: consolidated basis. As you get down to, I think we've got about a dozen statutory lines of business, you run into more variability because you got smaller numbers, but on a consolidated basis, we've got a really good track record of posting reserves in a conservative fashion that developed favorably over time.
spk03: Yeah, I guess I was trying to get at, it's not, you know, benefiting from, you know, property outweighing casualty because you weren't really writing much casualty back then to begin with, or property back then to begin with.
spk10: Yeah, it gets pretty complex though, Andrew, because property is a short tail line that develops pretty quickly. Some of our casualty business, I'm not an actuary, but I call it medium tail, right? It's kind of in the middle, and then we write a lot of long tail casualty. I think candidly, our book of business is a nice mix of short, medium, and long. But in general, I would say the casualty business has performed well. We don't have one line of business for general liability. It's other liability occurrence, other liability claims made, products liability occurrence, products liability claims made. We may even track the excess separately from the primary. So, again, I think that's a kind of complexity run amok for a conference call, but in general, I think the takeaway for investors is they should have a lot of confidence in the concealed balance sheet. And the reason we're reiterating that is kind of to Brian's point earlier, there's a lot of companies coming out saying, hey, we need to take a big charge because we didn't put enough away in past years. And then we're trying to
spk05: give
spk10: our investors confidence that,
spk05: hey,
spk10: that's not coming
spk05: here.
spk03: Understood, thank you.
spk01: And we will take our next question from Pablo Singzon with JP Morgan. Your line is open.
spk08: Hi, thanks for squeezing me in. So, first question, maybe for Brian Haney. Appreciate the disclosure and submission con growth, but I was hoping to get some perspective on how policies and force are growing. Just given that your book is more weirded than you business than others, would it be reasonable to assume PIF growth is in the same neighborhood as submission con growth, and if not, how much lower?
spk09: I don't have those numbers off the top of my head. I think the one other way to look at it is, if you look at our average premium, it's probably going up a bit. And then if you look at our premium growth and back out our average premium growth, that's gonna give you a pretty good estimate of PIF growth. So I would probably say it's going up, it might be close to submission growth. I don't be guessing if I said anything. It's probably going up somewhere between 20 and 30%.
spk08: Yep, thanks, that makes sense. And then another one for you, Brian Haney. If we assume con sales lost cost increasing the mid single digit neighborhood, right? And a couple of that with the 5% pricing metrics provided, would it be fair to assume that nominal premiums are going maybe high single digits, assuming flat risk exposures?
spk09: Yeah, so the, yes is the short answer. You've got the competing effects of the real rate, the premium trends. So we get with inflation being elevated, we do get more premium just by virtue of prices of the underlying products going up, and then the lost cost trend offsetting that. So yes, that's what you said was fair.
spk08: Got it, and then a third question for maybe for Brian Petruccelli. The 1.2, the 120 bits benefit from that commissions in 24. Was that the full run rate or will there be some more of that in 25?
spk02: Again, I think that depends on, as Mike mentioned earlier, mix of business, but as that property book grows and becomes a larger percentage of the overall premium base, we are seeding off more of that business than we do on the casualty side. So it's
spk10: probably important to remind people that even the business we seed away, we do get a seeding commission back, if you will, from the re-insurers that has some embedded
spk05: profit in it for us.
spk08: Yep, yep, and then last for me, maybe for Mike or Brian Haney. I know this is something we'll see in the filings, but I was hoping you could provide a preview on the components of premium growth this quarter compared to the third quarter, right? And I'm thinking specifically of the breakdown between property, which I think grew more than 80% in the third quarter and casualty, which grew about 20%. Seems like the growth rates for those lines are fairly consistent in fourth quarter. Would you agree or disagree with that?
spk10: Well, I mean, property grew at a robust clip in the fourth quarter. Casualty, as Brian said, was pretty steady, but very strong double digit growth.
spk09: Transportation segment grew fairly well. Professional lines probably grew a little bit less than the rest of the book. So I think what you said
spk05: was accurate.
spk08: Okay, all right, thank you for the answers.
spk05: Thanks, Pablo.
spk01: And we will take some follow-up questions from Mark Hughes with Truist. Your line is open.
spk06: Yeah, thank you. The current accident year losses XCAT were flat for the full year compared to 2022, given what you see in terms of mixed business, loss cost trends, all of that. Is that a good starting point for 2024? Understanding that you do have seasonality in that, probably higher in the early part of the year and lower in the year for granted.
spk05: Well, we don't forecast
spk10: that,
spk05: but if you said that's what you're going to do, I don't think we'd take issue with that. Fair enough, thank you.
spk01: And we will take follow-up questions from Mike Zuremski with BMO. Your line is open.
spk07: Hey, thanks, real quick. I know you gave us some nuggets on the, expense ratio pushes and pulls and the prepare remarks. So I guess we can just use that to think through the forward 24 numbers, unless you wanted to kind of maybe hold our hands a little bit more and help us think through how much of is going to run rate into the coming quarters.
spk06: Yeah,
spk07: I mean, I
spk02: don't think we can say any more than we did. Look at
spk05: the annual expense ratio. Take
spk02: a look at the annual expense ratio and that should be a pretty good guide for you.
spk05: Okay,
spk07: that's all I had. Thank you, helpful.
spk05: Thanks
spk07: Mike.
spk01: And we will take follow-up questions from Pablo Singzon with JP Morgan. Your line is open.
spk08: Hey, I thought I'd just throw in one more on reserves. So recognizing that the overall reserve position is good. Maybe this one's for Mike. I think in the past, he had call-outs pressure and specific lines, if I remember correctly, it was construction, right? I was wondering if you could provide perspective and sort of where, you know, recognizing that the revolve book is in a good spot, but are there lines of business or classes where, you know, you're probably more at risk than others?
spk05: Well, what's
spk10: unique to construction, Pablo, is the fact that it's one of our longer tail lines of business, specifically a component of the construction business, which we call construction defect. They're typically water intrusion claims. Sometimes the water intrusion is so slow that the property owner isn't even aware of it for a number of years. And by the time it's discovered, it could be, you know, an extensive renovation, a million dollar claim. And those claims can come in late, five, seven, nine years later sometimes. California, I think, has a 10 year statute of repose. I think Colorado, maybe like seven years. You know, other states like Virginia, I think it's one year. So it varies a little bit depending on where you are, but the long tail nature of that business combined with, I think we hit 9% inflation a couple of years ago. You know, that inflation hit labor costs. It hit, you know, building supply costs. So, you know, there was definitely an impact on the construction book at Conceal.
spk05: Does that answer your question?
spk08: Yeah, and I was wondering, aside from construction, are there any other lines or paths where you sort of see, you know, not major issues, but sort of these, like, I guess latent issues emerging, or is construction sort of like pop of mind for you and the rest of the lines are, you know, broadly okay?
spk10: You know, I would say construction is probably the most material, you know, it's a big part of our business. So that kind of stands out to me. I mean, you know, in general, our book of business is performing at a really attractive level. That's why we're publishing these kinds of results, not just in the fourth quarter, but, you know, for the last several years. Those results are a reflection of a high-performing business, even in the face of a lot of conservatism in the reserving. And so even the construction business is generating a healthy return for us. It's just that, you know, some of those claims have developed a little bit later than maybe we originally anticipated.
spk08: Okay, yep, that makes sense, Mike. Thank you. Okay.
spk01: And we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Mr. Michael Kehoe for closing remarks.
spk10: Okay, well, thank you, operator, and thanks everybody for joining us today. And we look forward to speaking with everybody again here very soon. Have a great day.
spk01: And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer