This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
Operator
Good afternoon and welcome to Ladder Capital Corp's earnings call for the fourth quarter and full year 2021. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. This afternoon, Ladder released its financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31st, 2021. Before the call begins, I'd like to call your attention to the customary safe harbour disclosure in our earnings release regarding forward-looking statements. Today's call may include forward-looking statements and projections and we refer you to our most recent Form 10-K for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements and projections. We do not undertake any obligation to update our forward-looking statements or projections unless required by law. In addition, Ladder will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures on this call, which management believes are relevant to assessing the company's financial performance. The company's presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. These measures are reconciled to GAAP figures in our supplemental presentation, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Ladder's President, Pamela McCormack.
Ladder
Thank you and good evening, everyone. For the fourth quarter, Ladder generated distributable earnings of $27.7 million or 21 cents per share. For the full year 2021, Ladder generated distributable earnings of $61.3 million or 49 cents per share. In addition to having another quarter of strong loan originations, our earnings were supplemented by gains from our conduit securitization and real estate equity businesses. After initially emphasizing raising liquidity and reducing leverage earlier in the year, we began making new loans again in March of 2021. We ended the year by having originated a total of $2.9 billion of loans, including a record 92 balance sheet loans totaling $2.7 billion, resulting in the highest annual production of Ladder's balance sheet loans in Ladder's history. The growth in our portfolio led to strong earnings momentum over the course of the year, and we are pleased with the risk-reward profile of the resulting portfolio, which continues to reflect our rigorous credit standards and return expectations. As of December 31st, over 65% of our $3.5 billion balance sheet loan portfolio was comprised of post-COVID originated loans with fresh valuations and business plans. The composition of the portfolio remains consistent and continues to be primarily comprised of lightly transitional loans with a weighted average loan to value of 67%. In the fourth quarter, Ladder originated $1.3 billion of loans, including 43 balance sheet loans totaling $1.2 billion, with a weighted average loan to value of 64% and a weighted average coupon of 4.43%. Approximately one-third of our balance sheet loan originations were made to repeat ladder borrowers. Since the start of the new year, we closed an additional $300 million of new loans, and we continue to have a strong pipeline of additional loans under application. In our conduit business, we securitized or sold $131 million of loans during the fourth quarter for total gains of $2.7 million, and we are continuing to build our pipeline, which we will target for sale or securitization over the coming quarters. In our equity business, the majority of our $1.1 billion portfolio is comprised of net lease assets, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants with necessity-based businesses under long-term leases. The portfolio contributed nicely to earnings again during the quarter, with $7.3 million of net gains further illustrating the embedded value within the portfolio. As of year end, our securities portfolio totaled $703 million, down from over a billion dollars at the beginning of the year as we reallocated capital into our balance sheet loan business, which we continue to believe is currently offering the best risk-adjusted returns. Our loan origination business was supported by $1.7 billion of capital raised during the year through two managed CLOs and an unsecured bond issuance. including a second managed CLO we closed during the quarter, the details of which Paul will discuss. As of year end, we have total liquidity of over $800 million, and our adjusted leverage stood at 1.5 times net of cash. 39% of our total debt was comprised of unsecured bonds, and 83% of our total debt was comprised of unsecured bonds and non-recourse financing. We continue to maintain a differentiated approach to our capital structure within the commercial mortgage rate space through our exceptional use of unsecured corporate bonds. In our view, this is the best, most balanced, and safest way to finance a mortgage origination platform for the long term. With the highest corporate credit ratings in the space and ratings only one notch away from investment grade from two of the three agencies, we are making substantial progress on our path towards becoming an investment grade company. As Brian will elaborate on more later, we are well positioned to benefit from a potential rising interest rate environment, both by way of our large and growing portfolio of floating rate loans, as well as our significant base of fixed rate liabilities. In conclusion, we continue to expect our strong originations momentum and our long-term investment in our capital structure to benefit a lot of shareholders in the quarters and years to come. With that, I'll turn the call over to Paul.
Ladder
Thank you, Pamela. As Pamela discussed in the fourth quarter, LIDAR generated distributable earnings of $27.7 million, or $0.21 per share. Originations and pipelines remained very strong and were accompanied by a CLO that generated $566 million of gross proceeds during the quarter. The CLO financing is a managed deal with a 78% advance rate on $729 million of collateral contributed. The CLO has a weighted average interest cost of LIBOR plus 165 basis points, and provides for a two-year reinvestment period and has an expected average duration of approximately four years. This type of match-funded, non-recourse, non-mark-to-market financing complements our strategy of utilizing long-term, unsecured corporate bonds to finance our business. Overall, 2021 saw significant and successful capital markets offerings in both the corporate unsecured bond market and the managed CLO market, which have further solidified and lengthened our liability structure while simultaneously reducing our use of mark-to-market financing as we continue to move towards our investment-grade rated goal. As of December 31st, we had total liquidity of over $800 million, and approximately 88% of our capital structure was comprised of equity, unsecured bonds, and non-recourse, non-mark-to-market debt. Our nearest bond maturity is in October of 2025. Our three segments continue to perform well during the fourth quarter, and the latter is well positioned as we head into 2022. Our $3.5 billion balance sheet loan portfolio is 91% floating rate, diverse in terms of collateral and geography with less than a two-year weighted average remaining maturity. During the fourth quarter, loan origination activity outpaced payoffs as we added $751 million in balance sheet loans. Our balance sheet loan portfolio continues to perform well and the general portion of our CECL reserve decreased to 34 basis points as two thirds of our balance sheet loan portfolio as of December 31st was comprised of 2021 originations with new valuations and sponsored business plans. In summary, we feel good about the underlying credit of our loan portfolio. As Pamela mentioned, our conduit business contributed $2.7 million of gains to distributable earnings in the fourth quarter, with the sale of $131 million of loans in two separate transactions. Our $1.1 billion real estate portfolio includes 160 net lease properties, which represents two-thirds of the segment. Seventy percent of our net lease portfolio is leased to investment-grade tenants with long-term leases, and the portfolio continues to perform well. During the fourth quarter, we sold four properties, contributing net gains of $7.3 million to distributable earnings, including three net lease properties sold significantly above our depreciated basis. In total, during 2021, we received $219 million in net proceeds from the sale of real estate properties, which contributed $23.6 million in net gains to distributable earnings. As we continue to demonstrate the embedded value in our real estate portfolio and to be consistent with our peers who own real estate equity assets, in addition to mortgage assets as we do. In the fourth quarter, we updated our definition of adjusted leverage to add back the impact of GAAP accumulated depreciation and amortization to equity. As of December 31st, 2021, our adjusted leverage ratio stood at 1.8 times. Turning to our securities portfolio, as of December 31st, our $703 million portfolio is 87% AAA rated, 99% investment grade rated, with a weighted average duration of approximately two years. portfolio continues to benefit from strong natural amortization and therefore liquidity, as the majority of these positions are front pay bonds. Further, as of December 31st, our unencumbered asset pool stood at $2.8 billion and is comprised of 76% cash and first mortgage loans, thereby continuing to provide us excellent financial flexibility. During the fourth quarter, we repurchased 8.5 thousand shares of common stock, bringing our share repurchases for 2021 to 823,000 at a weighted average price of $10.95. We have 44.1 million remaining under our $50 million Board-authorized stock repurchase plan. Our underappreciated book value per share was $13.79 at quarter end, while GAAP book value per share was $12.01. based on $125.5 million shares outstanding as of December 31st. We declared a 20 cent per share dividend in the fourth quarter, which was paid on January 18th. And for more details on the fourth quarter and 2021 full operating results, please refer to our earnings supplement, which is available on our website, as well as our 10-K, which we expect to file tomorrow. With that, I'll turn the call over to Brian.
Pamela
Thanks, Paul. We're pretty happy with the results of the fourth quarter and the earnings momentum that's been established quarter over quarter in 2021. As we restarted our lending activities in March of 2021, we knew that all we had to do was invest our large cash position into earning assets using modest leverage, and our earnings per share would increase and rising dividend coverage would follow. We originated $2.9 billion in loans in 2021, and that pace of originations continued into January of 2022 when we originated over $300 million of new loans. I'd also like to mention that so far in 2022, we received $76 million in payoffs on two hotel loans that we modified in 2020, deferring some interest until maturity, and all deferred interest and exit fees were collected. Our pace of origination should moderate somewhat, as markets have reacted to central banks pivoting into a decidedly more hawkish tone in recent weeks, along with higher interest rates. At latter, we have been waiting for this turn towards higher rates, as inflation has taken on a more structural than transitory feel in the last few months. By balancing our differentiated liability structure between a larger component of unsecured fixed-rate corporate borrowings and a combination of floating-rate CLO and a minor component of short-term repo debt, we have positioned Ladder to let the Fed do some of the work for us in the coming year. We expect that our floating-rate balance sheet loans will produce more income as short-term rates rise while our average interest costs stay relatively fixed. If short-term rates move up by 100 basis points, we project our net interest income to increase annually by approximately 16 cents per share. If they rise by 200 basis points, we project net interest income to increase annually by approximately 36 cents per share. That may sound like a lot of rate movement, but in the last 12 months, the yield on the two-year U.S. Treasury has climbed by a factor of 15 times. from nine basis points in February of 2021 to about 135 basis points last night, while LIBOR has only moved from nine basis points to 13 basis points. The Fed seems to be significantly behind where the market seems to indicate they should be, and recent forecasts from several economists are predicting at least four hikes in 2022, with some estimating as many as seven hikes this year. Also remember that in 2019, one month LIBOR was at 2.50% in a market that seemed to have only benign levels of inflation. Inflation forecasts look quite different today, and we believe ladder's earnings will feel a nice tailwind in the quarters ahead. As I look back over 2021, the lending business was rather difficult with astonishingly low prevailing interest rates and fierce competition. All lenders experienced high loan volumes and lower rates. However, those absolute rates allowed for credit spreads to be quite attractive relative to historical spreads. When we went into the pandemic, we had a floor of approximately 6.50% on our balance sheet loans, and we are now originating loans at a faster overall pace, but at rates with floors just under 4.5%. This comes as no surprise to us, and due to our decades of experience in the mortgage lending business, we made a decision about 10 years ago to accumulate a highly curated real estate portfolio that delivered double-digit returns year after year, expecting it to appreciate in value if rates moved decidedly lower, and they did just that. In 2021, we selectively sold real estate assets, generating gains of $23.6 million. The gains on sale supplemented our lower top-line interest income as higher-rate loans with Flores paid off, and as we ran the company with a higher liquidity profile appropriate for the times we were in. We have successfully deployed the liquidity we amassed prior to March of 2021, and we now expect our top-line interest income to increase as short-term interest rates rise throughout the year. Because of our growing loan portfolio, we saw our top-line interest income jump from $37.6 million in the second quarter to $46.2 million in the third quarter, with a further increase in the fourth quarter to $53.0 million. And the first quarter of 2022 is off to a great start. So we expect this growth in income to continue, even if the Fed does nothing. As we built up our loan portfolio, we took advantage of lower rates and sold some of our real estate assets at substantial gains. We expect to see some additional sales in the first quarter, but it's likely this activity will be somewhat curtailed toward the end of the year. We continue to believe that our real estate portfolio is not properly reflected in our stock price, even after we sold a small portion of our holdings at attractive gains. We believe the bigger gains in this book of business are not yet realized. To wrap it up today, I'll end by saying that we're back to fighting off the front foot, and we expect the quarters ahead to be very rewarding for our shareholders as the positive operating leverage we've designed will start to deliver the results we expect. We can now take some questions.
Paul
Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. The confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star key. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. Our first question is from Tim Hayes of BTIG. Please proceed with your question.
Tim Hayes
Hey, good evening, guys. First question, since you ended with kind of the comments around the pace of real estate sales, Brian, and the embedded value there, I would love to just kind of harp on that a little bit. Are you seeing a softening in bids for your net lease assets now that there's obviously a much higher expectation for rates over the course of the year? Or when you say that you expect that to curtail in the back half of the year, is that just kind of your estimate, or are you seeing that already? And then if you could just talk about the types of assets that you did sell this past quarter, if that's part of a bigger pool, a bigger portfolio of more that you think you can harvest in the near term, and just any comments around the embedded value that you think is there. Sure, Tim. Thanks.
Pamela
First of all, no, no softening in bid levels or interest in the net lease arena that we own today. However, I do expect it to soften a little bit only because of naturally with rates going higher in order to finance these things faster. You'll be borrowing at higher rates. Interestingly enough, though, when we first started selling some of our real estate assets, they were generally sold to people who had 1031 exchanges, where a guy with a first and a last name, and he wanted to avoid a tax payment. Whereas the publicly traded REITs would not usually buy these assets. And the reason why wasn't because they were not good assets. They just don't like to assume CMBS debt. And many of our assets have CMBS debt, all assumable. And they also don't, you know, the prepayment penalties were pretty high. Interestingly enough, the public companies, I think they've rallied quite a bit. So their dividends are quite a bit lower than they used to be. And as a result of that, they are now absorbing and literally paying the prepayment penalties for us to retire some of our CMBS debt. So what you're seeing in these gains on sale with our triple net properties are the net gains after expenses are taken out for prepayment penalties and things like that. The other thing I did was we wanted to see really what was our real estate portfolio worth because it's a little bit of a niche business, and it does very well at certain times, and then at other times it's not always so interesting. But it usually does very well in a low inflationary environment. And with our long-term leases, you know, we've been able to sell both assumed mortgage properties as well as paid-off properties. But what's interesting is we tend to go a little deep into the names when we own things. So I think we owned about seven or eight BJ's Wholesale Clubs towards the, I don't know, call it a year ago. I could be off by a quarter there. And I think we sold three of them. And we still have four or five of them. So we've got a very good idea that in that scenario, assuming there's nothing wrong with the BGs we're still holding, we're probably up about 30% on those. And I think we could sell them. In fact, we sold three to three different parties. The second thing we've witnessed is we also own a private grocer. We bought about seven properties out in Iowa with a company called Hy-Vee. And Hy-Vee, we purchased them with about a 6-3 cap rate, and they just sold a portfolio of similar properties with longer leases than we have because we've owned ours for seven years. But they sold them at a 4-2 cap. And so we think that we're up substantially there, and in order to prove that to ourselves, we actually sold one of them. And, in fact, that is exactly, you know, we did feel a big gain there. So keep in mind, we still own about five or six of those. I think that basis is about $55 million, but we can easily extrapolate and say we're probably up 20% to 30% on those. I don't usually go too deep into the individual statistics here, but I will say we own Dollar General's. We've been accumulating those. We actually haven't bought one in a while now, but we have about 140 million of those. And those we own at a 7-plus cap, and those are routinely trading in the market at about a 5, 4.5 cap in pretty good locations. So I think we've got a substantial gain there also, and we do own over 100 of them. So that's just a smattering. I'm giving you an example, not all of them. So we do expect higher rates certainly to impact the pool of borrowers. However, what is not showing any signs of deterioration is the public companies. that are bidding on these things. So it's kind of funny, and the reason we point out in our call today is that we really don't feel like our real estate is appreciated in our stock price, because we're basically a public company, and we're selling them to other public companies. And they're buying them from us at a gain, and yet their dividends are substantially lower than ours. So the price appreciation is different. And we have more to talk about, I think, and we're going to start talking a lot more about our real estate portfolio. Just one further example, we own a student housing portfolio out in Santa Barbara, and if you have any interest at all in staying up reading too much, Charlie Munger is trying to build a dorm out there called, and there's a lot of publication in the press on it, they're calling it Dormzilla because they are so pressed for housing in this college that they're looking to build a dormitory with about 2,000 rooms and most of them have no windows. So we own a substantial portion of assets there in the Isla Vista neighborhood in Southern California. And so as we look through our portfolio, some of them have stories behind them, some of them don't. But most importantly, I think, on the triple net side, we've been selling a couple of things that we own a bunch of. So we've got a pretty good idea now on what we think they're worth. So hopefully that helps.
Tim Hayes
Yeah, that's really granular, helpful information, Brian. I appreciate it. So it sounds like clearly a lot of embedded value in this portfolio, and you are proving it out. It seems like your appetite to continue doing that is still pretty high. I guess I'm just curious, you know, like, obviously, I'm sure the rating agencies like to see you guys have that sticky balance. income and how, you know, how that portfolio is financed is nice too. So, I mean, are you okay with continuing to harvest these gains and let that portfolio kind of run off to be a smaller percentage of the overall business? Like, where do we see that going over time, assuming that, you know, the bids are there?
Pamela
We don't try to figure out where interest rates are going over a 10-year period of time. We go into each of these investments with a view as to what we think they should yield over time. And when we begin to exceed those gains that we were planning for, we'll start to winnow them back a little bit and sell some of them. There's no wholesale sale. I will tell you, though, the sale that iStar conducted of their net lease portfolio certainly caught my eye, and a few of our shareholders have even indicated to us perhaps if we thought we could replace it, and we do think we can replace it, by the way, perhaps we should sell our entire portfolio or else put it off balance sheet in a net lease REIT that we manage externally. So these are all scenarios that we occasionally look through, but we haven't made any decisions in that regard just yet. But for the most part, net lease properties are best in our opinion, are best purchased when you have a fairly steep yield curve, and that's been a long time since we've seen that. I do expect to see more of that going forward, and I think that a lot of their net lease REITs don't use a lot of mortgage financing, so they're not impacted by... by the yield curve, but we are because, as you know, we'll write a CMBS loan into a trust, and then we'll take what we target double-digit returns for the next 10 years, and then when the loan comes due, we usually have another 10 years behind it, and at that point we make a decision to sell, blend and extend if we want to talk to the operator. But this all breaks down if you have bad credits in those pools. So we're very, very meticulous about who we will purchase 10-year assets from. And we focus on, as Pamela said, the necessity-based retailers. And, listen, there's always a time for a necessity-based retailer, but rarely has there been a time where, you know, the wholesale clubs and the grocery stores have done better than in the last couple of years.
Tim Hayes
Right, right. Well, if I could just rephrase my last question a different way, because it's not saying you're going to sell your net lease portfolio, but it sounds like you are potentially open to the idea and you're obviously also rotating capital out of the CMBS portfolio into loans. Like are you, ladder has historically been this diversified commercial real estate investment company, but are you okay with going more towards kind of like a pure play lending platform with maybe conduit on the side? Is that something, not saying it's going to happen, but like, would you be okay transitioning more to that model than where you're at today? I think so.
Pamela
I don't think there's anything wrong with our model today. And oftentimes we talk to people who are, for whatever reason, inquisitive enough to bring it up. But I think there's a possibility that our multifaceted approach has been a little too complicated, whereas I see some of the monolines, even though you've got to be very careful in those monoline businesses when you're – When it's not time to buy them, you have to keep buying them, and that's never a great idea. But I'm not against. I don't think anybody on the team is against it, you know, moving more towards a balance sheet, recurring earnings, you know, sustainable cash flow model. The conduit will always be something that we'll parachute into here and then because of the inherently high ROE and little use of capital, frankly. But everything's for sale. We own a fairly hefty real estate portfolio still. Would we sell the whole thing? Sure we would. On the other hand, I tend to think we're moving towards a an environment where if the curve doesn't steepen, we're going into a recession if the 10-year doesn't get moving. And in that environment, you know, in a flat environment, we would hang on to those net lease assets. In a rising rate environment, I think we would just as soon sell them and replace them with other assets we can buy because we think we can find them. The fact that we haven't acquired a lot in the recent past is not a statement as to we can't. It's a statement as to the conditions don't seem right.
Tim Hayes
Got it. Got it. Well, I appreciate the comments this evening. It was very interesting and in-depth, and I'll hop back into Q for now. Okay.
Paul
Our next question is from Jade Romani of KBW. Please proceed with your question.
spk06
Thanks very much. Just while we're on the subject, on the overall commercial real estate owned portfolio, Is the debt transferable, and how easy is it to refinance? Because another option would be to just increase the leverage since you have these unrealized gains out of those portfolios rather than selling the assets outright.
Pamela
That's a good question because we have actually rolled some of them over and refinanced them. And in nearly all instances, they turn into a cash-out refi. And in many instances, because of the cap compression that's taken place over the last 10 years with a rather stagnant low real estate environment – I mean low interest rate environment – we almost have no basis in some of these assets when we do that. So, sure, we tend to target a double-digit rate of return over the long term, and we think we can manage that, and we think we can find new ones that do that. So sometimes it's helpful to take gains and harvest, you know, 25%, 30% increases in valuation and then go do it again. However, if we were to stop selling them, because we won't sell them at a price that we don't like, But if we were to stop selling them, then we could easily, yeah, just in all likelihood put them into a lower rate refinance where there's cash out because the valuations have increased. The valuations are what they are. We don't control that. But by virtue of the fact we've been selling them at hefty gains, we would expect the appraisals to do the same thing. But, you know, it's always hard to say goodbye to a double-digit rate of return. But, yeah, sometimes it's time to let them go and do it again where you think you might have a better ROE situation. It's important in those environments. You have to remember these leases are getting shorter, not longer. And the companies are doing quite well. In fact, the market cap rate on Dollar General and BJ's and several of the companies we own has tripled in many cases. So they're much stronger credit. So we're not really in a credit conversation anymore, at least not now. But with rates expected to rise and lease terms getting shorter, I would expect there to be some view towards perhaps we'll sell them. But if we were to refinance them, it's gotten a lot cheaper to refinance them now because rates have gone up. I know that seems weird, but because the prepayment penalties have come down so much because of the 10-year movement and the defeasance calculations.
spk06
Okay. Thank you for that. You know, it seems like most of the non-bank lenders in particular, but the overall lending market was pretty gangbusters the last two quarters. Some of that momentum seems to have continued this quarter. Maybe it'll slow with all the volatility. But CMBS has significantly lagged. So I guess the two questions would be, one, what are your thoughts around the surge in originations? You know, why do you think that took place? But then why also do you think CMBS was such a laggard? And thanks so much.
Pamela
Sure. Let me take it in reverse order. I think CMBS has been lagging. The answer to both questions is the pandemic, but with different reasons why. To sign off on a 10-year CMBS loan, generally you need 12-month, trailing 12-month cash flows from tenants that are in occupancy and paying rent. And there was such an interruption in who's in an office building. And I can remember underwriting loans where we would write a loan on an office building And you go see the office building out in Indianapolis, and there's no one in it. So that presents a problem to a lender on a 10-year loan. Whereas under normal times and circumstances, of course, you show up, it's bustling, and people are downstairs ordering breakfast. And then you get the estoppel from the CEO, and you just go on. So I think CMBS was burdened by two things. One, it was tough to get a fix on trailing 12th. But as you can imagine, with everybody staying home, the apartment market did very well. So it wasn't hard to find 10-year loans in the apartment market. However, the apartment market is dominated by Fannie and Freddie. So as a result of that, the CMBS business suffered. And the second thing that hurt the CMBS business is the flat yield curve. With a 10-year, right now even, let's say it's 2% and you sell a AAA at 90 over, you get a 2.9% and you just saw an inflation print of 7.5, I think. So that's always a dangerous thing to be holding, a long-term piece of paper that might go upside down on you on funding, not because anything's wrong, just because spreads have moved out and rates are moving higher. Not a lot of people in the market are used to dealing with that. But in the old days, in the 80s and 90s, those were things that you had to, if you made a loan like that, you had to sell it almost right away. Otherwise, you risk having a negative carry situation. At the beginning of your question, you talked about how the leverage, the CLO lenders, I'll call it, have been having a hell of a time with a lot of volume here. Well, I think deep down inside, interest rates have been very low. And that's actually one of the things I mentioned while I was talking on the earnings, you know, the initial call there is that while rates were low when LIBOR was at nine basis points, spreads were high. And most experienced lenders in the space, if you're writing apartment building loans at 350 over LIBOR, you're doing pretty well on a historical basis. However, 350 over LIBOR is a 3.59% rate, and that's not terribly interesting. I think as rates go higher here, you will see spreads tighten. So just because LIBOR is moving up, don't naturally assume that the prevailing rate that the investors get will naturally go up. It will go up. It has been going up. Spreads have been widening now. But I think the spread widening is taking place because LIBOR hasn't moved. And I think the investors are rightfully building in some version of they should have moved by now, and it just hasn't happened. I mean, the two-year moved 25 basis points this afternoon. So I said in the original discussion there, I was afraid to say where the two-year was because I didn't know where it would close. But like I said last night, it was at 135. Right now it's at 155. So I think spreads will tighten in the CLO business as LIBOR begins to move. So it won't naturally be just this ratcheting higher in absolute interest rates. And the other reason that there's been a lot of availability there is I think in the post-pandemic era, there were a lot of people who thought about selling their assets and just didn't get around to it before the pandemic hit. And I think those people, especially the older folks that own small apartment buildings in New York, San Francisco, and some of the other bigger cities, they just sold them at that point. They got tired of carrying them for a year or two, and the investment has probably been very good to them over the last 20 or 30 years. But we did see a lot of old-time families selling assets that they've held for decades.
spk06
Thanks very much for taking the questions. Sure.
Paul
As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to take up your handset before pressing the star key. One moment, please, while we poll for additional questions. Our next question is from Steve Delaney of J&P Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Steve Delaney
Thanks, and congratulations, everyone, on a great close to a comeback year. Oh, and Brian, I just checked my screen. The two years at 161 up 26, so.
Pamela
If you walk away for five minutes today.
Steve Delaney
You can't. You got to stay glued to the screen, man, especially if you're a bond guy. I want to just ask a couple quick things. Cash, $549 million, down about $200 million from $750 at $930. So what would be sort of the minimum level? I know it fluctuates day-to-day and week-to-week, but as far as sort of a target, maybe I'll sit this way. $550 million, is some of that excess cash? And if so, you know, how much? Okay. Yeah. So maybe, you know.
Pamela
Yeah, I think I know where you're going here. So what's the carry rate? What do you want to go home every night with? In general, I think we generally say about $100 million. I personally think that number is probably a little high, and it probably comes out often when we say $100 million because we still own about $700 million in securities. However, and I do expect our securities portfolio to become much smaller as time goes on. They're paying off very rapidly right now. They're They're in that part of the – these are the A classes from CLOs from 2015. So those are kind of taking care of themselves. If we need to sell them for capital, we certainly will. We have no problem with that. The collateral is in excellent shape. But we also have a $250 million revolver that's not drawn. you don't want to draw the revolver for any reason other than a short-term reason. But so I'll tell you, with a lighter securities book, I would be comfortable with $50 to $75 million, although I believe we generally think $100 million is the overnight minimum that we'll go home with.
Steve Delaney
Yeah, that's helpful. Thank you. Rates, you know, I mean... They've obviously broken out, but volatility scares everybody. It scared the stock market, and it's looked to me just in the last week or so that the credit markets, that the fixed income credit markets are responding. In the last week, we don't see what you see on your screen. But it appeared that new issue AAA, 10-year AAAs widened by about 10 basis points on CMBS. I talked to a couple people this week that did CLOs in the last two or three weeks, and they said, thank God, I'm glad I got my deal done because what I'm hearing now is, you know, bankers are saying, you know, we're not taking anybody out. So I'm just curious. You hear all this chatter all day long, and has this – what impact has this – rapid move higher in rates. It was volatility a month ago. Now it's just one direction, right? So where do you see credit reacting to this rate move? Thank you.
Pamela
I think the two things that are driving the investor wider on credit spreads in the long-term fixed rate market, so that's the conduit, are the VIX. You know, it's been comfortably above 20 now for quite a while, and it was in the 30s for a little while. Those are pretty near panic levels, the 30s. So that naturally causes people either to not bid at all because there's too much volatility or else widen out their price. So that's one, just general volatility. The second, and by the way, there's plenty of reasons to be volatile, too. You know, I can go through a litany of them at this point, but, you know, it doesn't surprise me at all that people are a tad nervous when you think about what's going on, and the virus is only one of those things on a list of about seven. And the second part is the CLO market. The CLO market is simply oversupplied. And there were too many LIBOR-based loans trying to be sold to a rather large investor base, but large in dollars, not large in name. There's about five or six big accounts that if you're going to try to do a $1.5 billion CLO, you're going to need them in that transaction. And if they're not there, it's going to be a problem. So I think that they were inundated. There were too many deals going on. They couldn't catch up with them fast enough. And so they kind of gravitated toward the apartment loans, the ones that had the highest degree of apartments in them. which is what you would expect. And they've driven levels wider. I think there's a deal in the market today where the A-class is at 175 over. We did a CLO in June where the A-class executed at 120 over. A couple of years ago, there was a tight done at LIBOR plus 85 on an A-class. And what's interesting, the dynamic that's developed here in just the last few months, I would say, is that – A lot of people wrote a lot of apartment loans because they're considered very safe, and they probably are, but they were writing them in low 300s on the whole loan side called Libra Plus 325. And then they go to the CLO market with their pool, and they get about 83% or 84% leverage there. And then they have fees and they have LIBOR costs based on where the bonds trade. And for the most part, those multifamily deals were levering the equity with 84% leverage and across collateralized pool into about a 13%, 14% rate of return. Today, at LIBOR plus $175,000, and I don't think the apartment deals are at $175,000, so let me put that down to $155,000, $160,000 maybe. Those transactions are levering the owner, the seller of those assets into about an 8.5% or a 9%. rate of return for BP's equity on apartments, that might be okay. However, what I find fascinating in that market is if you buy the A class in that transaction, which has about 50% subordination on every single loan in the pool and they're all apartments, You can use 90% leverage on that, which is, I know that sounds high, but keep in mind the equity is at 84. So it's not that much higher. And they actually are levering, given a cost of funds of LIBRA plus 50, they're levering into a double-digit return. So the AAA portion is levering to a return much higher than the BP's. at 84% leverage. And that is a phenomenon that probably should not last for very long. And I think with these widening in spreads, we'll see some demand, I mean, some originators backing up those spreads in the whole loan market from 325.
Steve Delaney
Yeah, that's great, Collar. Thank you so much. I had not realized, but I heard this last week about the The CLO market is a mile deep, but, you know, maybe 100 yards wide. It's exactly what you were saying about the five or six guys. So thank you so much for the comments. And again, great, great, great quarter and wrap up on the year. Thank you. Sure.
Paul
We have reached the end of the question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Brian Harris for closing remarks.
Pamela
Just thank you, everybody, on a very interesting day in the markets. We are fortunate to be positioned not just to do well with a rising rate environment, but to do exceptionally well. And I think we haven't earned anything on that bet yet, but I think that we're about to. So I look forward to talking to you all again in April. And if you're to believe the pundits today, there should be another 50 basis points on the Fed funds rate at that time. So we'll look forward to it, see how we did. Dr. Singh, thank you.
Paul
This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a great day.
Disclaimer