This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk08: Hello, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the first quarter of 2022 Louisiana Pacific Corporation Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you'll need to press star 1 on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you require any further assistance, please press star 0. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Aaron Howald, Vice President of Investor Relations and Business Development.
spk00: Please go ahead. Thank you, Operator.
spk06: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining LP Building Solutions today to discuss our results for the first quarter of 2022 and our updated outlook for the second quarter and the full year. My name is Aaron Howald, and I'm LP's Vice President of Investor Relations and Business Development. I'm joined this morning by Brad Southern, LP's Chief Executive Officer, and Alan Hockey, LP's Chief Financial Officer. During this morning's conference call and webcast, we will refer to an accompanying presentation that is available on LP's Investor Relations webpage, which is www.investor.lpcorp.com. Our 8K filing is also available there, along with our earnings press release and other materials. We expect to file our 10Q in a few days. Slides two and three of the earnings presentation provide notices and detail regarding non-GAAP financial metrics and forward-looking statements. The appendix of the presentation also contains some necessary reconciliations that are further supplemented by this morning's 8K. Rather than reading those statements, I incorporate them by reference. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Brad.
spk02: Thanks, Aaron. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to LP's earnings call for the first quarter of 2022. The year is off to a very strong start for LP, with record quarterly net sales of $1.34 billion and EBITDA of $636 million. LP's ongoing share repurchases have reduced the share count by enough that the resulting quarterly adjusted diluted earnings per share of $5.08 was a record. I'll begin our segment review by recognizing and thanking our Siding Solutions business team for operating during Q1 with no recordable injury. Financially, Siding Solutions set another quarterly sales record of $330 million in Q1. This represents a year-over-year revenue growth rate of 17% and is the combined effect of 12 percentage points of price, including mixed effect, which you will get to in a moment, and 4% volume growth. Sales volume exceeded 420 million square feet with an average selling price of $784 per thousand square feet. Siding EBITDA margin was 25% in the quarter despite raw material inflation, freight cost increases, and simultaneous capacity expansion projects. Accelerated growth in siding has been remarkable, so let me put these results in a long-term context. In Q1 of 2019, much earlier in LP strategic transformation, SmartSide Strand generated $187 million in net sales on 284 million feet of volume at an average sales price of $659 per thousand square feet. The past three years have seen compound annual growth rates of 14% for volume and 6% for price, resulting in 21% compound annual revenue growth. EBITDA for the siting segment has doubled in three years, which is a CAGR of 25%. A significant component of this growth is a shift in product mix to higher value-added siding products. As you can see on slide seven of the presentation, Expert Finish, Smooth, Corners, Shakes, and Builder Series, all new since Q1 of 2019, accounted for 11% of total volume this past quarter and are the fastest-growing subset of the SmartSide product portfolio. This growth is driven by strong customer demand in new residential construction and, especially with the addition of expert finish, increasingly strong demand in repair and remodeling applications. To meet this demand, LP is making ongoing investments in capacity. I am happy to announce that Holton started SmartSide production in March on schedule and is shipping a great SmartSide as we speak. We are on schedule for a Q1 2023 startup for our next mill conversion in Segola, Michigan. There is a long runway of future capacity options after Segola, including conversions, expansions of existing facilities, and greenfield siding mills. We will share details about future capacity additions soon. We're also adding expert finish capacity by expanding our existing facilities while building a new one in Bath, New York. The bath facility is ideally located to receive prime SmartSide from Holton, finish it, and distribute it regionally to a market with huge potential for SmartSide. I will add that while this demand is gratifying, it is not surprising. We think that SmartSide is the best siding product available, and a growing number of homeowners, builders, and contractors seem to agree. As we announced last year, SmartSide is also carbon negative. in recognition of which GreenBuilder Media recently named it the most sustainable product in the siting category. The OSB segment, driving growth in the valued added structural solutions portfolio, supports LP's ambition to be recognized as the leading producer of specialty building products. Structural solutions volume exceeded 500 million feet in Q1, an all-time record. Structural solutions accounted for 55% of total OSB volume which is 8 percentage points higher than last year. The OSB segment released two new specialty products in the first quarter, both of which will contribute to the structural solutions mix. The first is Legacy Premium Subfloor Adhesive, which is designed to contribute to insulation efficiency and improve the quality and durability of flooring systems. The second is NovaCore Insulated Sheathing, which combines the structural integrity of OSB sheathing with thermal and acoustic insulation by adding a layer of expanded polystyrene insulation. Ovicor can be used as a direct substitute for sheathing with standard stub spacing and other framing processes. OSP prices climbed sharply through Q1, ending the quarter at nearly double the level at year end. This produced just over $500 million in EBITDA, second only to Q2 of last year and better than most prior full-year results for the OSB segment. Obviously, this generated extraordinary cash flow, which LP will continue to return to shareholders. I want to congratulate Jimmy Mason, who has been named Executive Vice President and General Manager of the OSB business after several years as the Vice President of Siding Manufacturing. I am confident that Jimmy will excel in this role, as he has so consistently done in the past. And I'm very proud that LP's bench strength allows us to promote internally to fill such a critical leadership position. Engineered Wood in South America also had strong quarters. EWP generated $170 million of revenue and $38 million in EBITDA on strong demand for I-Joyce and laminated veneer lumber. South America delivered $67 million in sales and $25 million in EBITDA. It should come as no surprise that LP continues to face headwinds from raw material cost inflation, as well as logistics challenges with boxcar and truck availability in Canada as the most acute gaps. For freight, availability is the key issue with cost secondary. We are working with customers and logistics providers to get through this, but we expect these challenges to persist for some time. So far, freight availability has had limited impact on siting, but logistics challenges have forced some intermittent downtime at our Canadian OSB mills. Alan will provide more detail on these cost pressures and their impacts. And with that, I will turn the call over to Alan for a more detailed review of LP's financial results and an update on our capital allocation strategy before we take your questions.
spk04: Thanks, Brad, and thank you all for joining us this morning. As Brad said, the first quarter was exceptionally strong. The story, fundamentally, is that the things LP can drive and control, namely 17% siding growth and 55% structural solutions mix, more than offset the negative impacts of raw material and freight inflation. And the OSB price climb during the quarter generated significant cash, which we continue to return to shareholders. But before discussing the siding and OSB segments in more detail, I'll give a brief overview of total company performance. Despite my love for round numbers, I must point out that the $1.3 billion of revenue is actually $11 million higher than the same $1.3 billion we reported in the second quarter of last year, making this technically a record quarter for sales. EBITDA of $636 million was an increase of $174 million over last year, of which $130 million was the result of higher OSB prices. We generated operating cash flow of $425 million and spent $92 million of it on CapEx. Less obvious is that our record adjusted earnings per share of $5.08 would have been nearly a dollar lower, but for LP's significant share repurchases, which have reduced the share count by more than 20% over the last 12 months. The waterfall on page 8 details the quarter for siding. The selling price increase of 12% added $30 million in both revenue and EBITDA. Volume increased by 4% to 421 million square feet. And given that we were already operating basically at full capacity this time last year, this record performance was only made possible by impressive system-wide operations, including logistics. Naturally, having just started up, Halton shipped minimal volume in the first quarter, but it did start on time and it is ramping up quickly. Investments in growth of $12 million includes $9 million of Halton and $3 million of increased selling and marketing spend. The rising costs of crude oil and derivative chemicals drove up the price of resins and overlays as well as the cost of transporting logs to the mills. The resulting $26 million of inflationary costs was, however, more than offset by the aforementioned price increases. The resulting EBITDA of $83 million at a margin of 25% is remarkable, given the combined impacts of inflation and the simultaneous expansion projects at Holton and Segola. This demonstrates that even in periods with significant investments in growth, high inflation, and a mill startup, the siding segment can deliver both long-term growth and long-term margin expansion. The OSB waterfall on page 9 shows a $205 million year-over-year increase in revenue. About two-thirds of this came from higher OSB prices. The bulk of the remainder is driven by the combined impact of higher volume from increased capacity at Peace Valley and an eight-point increase in structural solutions mix. Despite the restart of Peace Valley, the volume of commodity OSB sold in the quarter fell by 4%, as structural solutions volume grew by over 30%. to reach 55% of total OSB volume. This shift to structural solutions consistent with LP's strategic transformation delivered $78 million of revenue and $47 million of EBITDA. As in the siding business, raw material inflation presented a $21 million headwind in the quarter. But while siding is sold at delivered prices, OSB freight is largely passed on to customers, meaning that increases in freight costs have minimal impact on OSB segment EBITDA. So, another incredible quarter of cash generation in the OSB business, the bulk of which we are in the process of returning to shareholders. Page 10 summarizes the quarter for LP as a whole. I've already mentioned the $130 million of OSB price impact in North America. A similar dynamic added $20 million in sales on EBITDA in South America. But I want to direct your attention to the middle section, which aggregates the impacts of LP's controllable strategic efforts and the less controllable inflationary impacts. Siding growth of $47 million, structural solutions growth of $78 million, offset by a decrease in commodity OSB volume of $12 million, resulted in a net revenue increase of $113 million. That is 47 plus 78 minus 12. The corresponding EBITDA impact was $76 million. That is 34 plus 50 minus 8. This $76 million not only offsets, but is nearly double the negative impact of inflation in North America of $44 million. Now, we can't control or predict future costs, and we do expect continued headwinds for some time. But the best defense is a good offense, as the saying goes. And in LP's case, that offense is a relentless drive towards specialty products, which is, of course, the core of LP's transformation strategy. Page 11 summarizes cash flow. We started the quarter with $371 million in cash. The $636 million generated by EBITDA was partly offset by a $180 million increase in working capital, the largest component of which, at $127 million, is the effect of rising prices on accounts receivable balances. The normal effect of seasonal log inventory increase and an inevitable inflationary increase in the unit value of inventory accounts for the remainder. After minimal other stuff, LP generated $425 million of operating cash flow. We spent $92 million in the quarter on maintenance and growth capital and returned $123 million to shareholders. The $59 million in business divestitures is the proceeds from the sale of our 50-cent stake in the iJoyst joint venture with Resolute Forest Products. As a side note, the associated $39 million gain has, of course, been excluded from both adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income. The net result of all this is a $266 million increase in cash, raising it to $637 million at quarter end. Which brings me to capital allocations. The $104 million spent on share repurchases lowered our share count from 86 million to 84.5 million shares. As of Monday morning, we spent a further $182 million to repurchase 2.9 million more shares, bringing our share count as of yesterday morning to 81.6 million. This leaves $214 million remaining under the pre-existing $500 million authorization. And we continue to believe that LP shares remain significantly undervalued. Accordingly, LP's Board of Directors has approved a further $600 million for share repurchases, bringing our total authorization, as of yesterday morning, to $814 million. Which brings me to page 12 in LP's updated second quarter and four-year guidance. CapEx for 2022 will be in the $400 to $430 million range. Given its remarkable first quarter and the ongoing ramp-up of Houghton, we are raising both our second quarter and full-year siding revenue guidance to year-over-year growth of at least 20%. As for OSB, without providing a price prediction, we will offer guidance predicated on a price scenario. Should random length prices remain unchanged from last Friday's levels and assuming no significant worsening of logistics availability, the OSB segment would generate about 7% less revenue in the second quarter than it did in the first quarter. Now, both Siding and OSB continue to invest in growth, including projects in the second quarter to add premium flooring capability to Peace Valley and improve the reliability of Clark County's emissions control technology. And, of course, both businesses continue to face headwinds from raw material and freight cost inflation. On that basis, and assuming no sudden reversals in demand or dramatic increases in costs, LP's consolidated EBITDA for the second quarter of 2022 should be at least $540 million. And with that, we'll be happy to take any questions.
spk08: Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you'll need to press star 1 on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. Our first question comes from John Babcock with Bank of America. You may proceed with your question.
spk10: Hey, good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. I guess starting now, it would be great if you could just talk about the housing repair and – sorry, repair and remodel markets and what you're seeing there. And then also on that point, are you seeing any indications of a slow and in demand with rising rates, higher home prices, and, you know, some of the other factors that exist out there in the marketplace?
spk02: Good question, John. And I would say for all three of the North American businesses, we're not seeing any let up of an ordered activity. You know, order files are strong all the way across the three businesses. I would say, generally speaking, or more than generally, specifically speaking, inventories are still lean across the different distributor types that we have. There was a little, I think, a little buildup in pro retail and pro OSB as the prices fell, but we're still across the board lean on inventories. And The outlook that we're hearing from our builder partners is still very positive, similar outlook for our distributor partners and our pro retail partners. So I do believe there's housing headwinds with mortgage rates and affordability, but it's certainly not impacting our order file today or our near-term outlook.
spk10: Gotcha, thanks for that. And then just on the siting growth outlook, you raised that obviously from greater than 15% to greater than 20%. You might have touched on this and maybe I missed it, but can you just talk about what's driving that increase? And then also, how does that new growth outlook impact your plans for the next siting project, if at all?
spk02: Well, yeah, I'll start with the last part of it. It does impact the plans for the next siting project in Segola because we need that as quickly as possible. And I would say also the one after that, which might have been the one you were referencing, John, we're full steam ahead on the planning for the one after Segola and then the one after that. So we are engaged in mill conversions just as quickly as we can do them and get parts ordered because of the growth that we're seeing. From an outlook standpoint, I mean, it's really pleasing to have such a good startup in Holton so that we'll have that extra capacity to sell beginning right now and certainly growing volume availability as we get confident there making A-grade production throughout the year. With Segola, a rather large mill, it will be a large mill for our system coming on in Q1. You're expecting to see good volume growth next year as well as a result of that conversion. and we're still on managed order file in our siding business. It's been over a year since we've been on managed order file. I could see us staying on managed order file the rest of this year, and then as we get into the Segola production next year, hopefully our capacity can catch demand a little bit, and we can get a little bit ahead so that our distributors can build some much-needed inventory, but the growth has been remarkably strong and resilient as we've moved through the last four quarters or so.
spk10: Okay, thank you. And then just last question before I turn it over. Just on South America, could you just talk about how market conditions feel down there relative to a quarter ago?
spk02: Yeah, the market has remained strong. You know, while LP South America pricing is not directly correlated with North America, there obviously is an impact as imported volume to South America moves in and out of the market. So we've seen good demand down there, and pricing has been more resilient than we were planning for, fortunately. So that resulted in a really good quarter. We are putting some capacity, some capital into that, into Chile to grow our capacity there with a full expectation that we'll be continuing to grow that volume over the next couple of years. So despite all the kind of the political changes turmoil down there and across South America, the OSP market has been really resilient.
spk10: Okay, great. Thanks for all the questions. All the answers. Appreciate it.
spk08: Thank you. And as a reminder, to ask a question, you'll need to press star 1. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Our next question comes from Ketan Mamdoura with BMO Capital Markets. You may proceed with your questions.
spk01: Thank you, and congrats on a strong quarter. Just very quickly, you've seen a pretty strong growth on the innovative product side in the siding business. I'm curious, Brad, how do you see the innovative products as a percentage of your total portfolio in siding as you look out over the next couple of years from the current 11%?
spk02: Keaton, obviously a key to our continued growth is our ability to innovate around new products. We see tremendous upside with our expert finish portfolio of products. Obviously the market is moving that way, and as we build capacity and have more substrate to sell, we'll be focused on expert finish as a growth platform for us. And then the other key driver to future growth is our builder series. That's a product that's been tailored for installation with large builders, national and regional builders. It does come with a price point that can be attractive there. And so those two will kind of be the workhorse innovative products that can drive incremental volume for us. But then we have a myriad of other ancillary products included, trim pieces, the whole smooth product offering that is also maybe not as much volume, but are certainly key to us being able to be a preferred siding supplier into our contractor and distributor base. So it's a really important part of what we're doing. As you mentioned, we're at 11%. right now as far as the innovative, and we see that going into 20 to 30% as we continue to innovate and we continue to find success with these potentially high-growth platforms like Builder Series and Expert Finish.
spk01: Okay, and then just as my follow-up, as you You know, as the siding demand continues to remain strong, and you mentioned you're up full steam ahead with, you know, thinking about post-Sagola capacity, is there any update in terms of, you know, you had laid out, you know, a few options in terms of capacity. Is there any update for us in terms of what might make more sense at this point, given how strong demand is?
spk02: No, Keaton, there's not. I mean, we continue to work on it since we talked about it on the last call. You know, as I've mentioned before, and I won't be repetitive unless I get a specific question around that, but we've got a myriad of options. Each of those options have different pros and cons, let's say, as far as capital intensity or regional location, ability of a particular press to make a certain product offering. And so we're continuing to do engineering. We're continuing to secure long lead time items, but we don't have to make that decision today. And because as we see our customer base shifts or our product preferences shift, we want to wait a little bit just to make sure that that next decision fits the current situation of the business. So we've got tons of options. We're working on it. But there's not a reason to make a decision today, so we want to continue to study the order file and order patterns before we make that call.
spk01: Got it. I'll jump back in the queue. Good luck for the rest of the year. Thank you, Keith.
spk08: Thank you. Our next question comes from Susan McQuarrie with Goldman Sachs. Can we proceed with your question?
spk03: Thank you. Good morning, everyone. My first question is, you know, on the siting side, thinking about the volumes there as Holton does ramp, can you just talk to how you're thinking of the cadence of growth, especially as we think about, you know, some of the comps that you face over the upcoming quarters relative to the incremental ramp that will come through as this new facility fully comes online?
spk02: Yeah, Susan, good morning. So the capacity of that That line for siting is about 220 million square feet. We plan and expect to be running at that rate by the end of the year. So there's a ramp-up curve that goes from basically zero in February to full capacity in December, pretty linear in that ramp-up. And then we would be at full capacity, obviously, for all of next year. So that's how we're thinking about it. We're certainly planning on having and selling that volume. It's much needed. So I hope you found that answer helpful.
spk03: Yes. No, that's definitely helpful. That's good. Thank you. And then my next question is, you know, when we do a lot of our channel checks around the home builders, especially as it relates to EWP and even for OSB, it sounds like inventories are exceptionally lean on the ground. You've got a lot of producers, especially on the EWP side, that I think are still on allocation there. And so as you think about some of those bottlenecks that you're continuing to face on the transportation side, as those do potentially start to ease as we get into the spring and the summer and some of that volume starts to come through, how do we think about those different kind of pushes and pulls as it relates to the supply and demand dynamics and what that might mean for pricing as we look to the back half of this year?
spk02: I'll tell you, I'm not going to give a specific price outlook, but just let me speak to product flow is I think the nature of your question. I believe, look, the OSP market and the EWP market are big markets, as you know. Builders are very busy, very active, have a nice backlog for the rest of the year. And so as the logistics challenges free up, if they do as we move through the year, and they will, Channel inventory is so lean that I think a good bit of production could just go into restocking, distribution, and look, even the warehouses at our mills to get to some kind of normal service level before demand capacity would be out of kilter. And then any kind of growth in housing, if other supply chain industries bottlenecks free up in the second half of the year so the builders can even build at a higher pace, that would be even more of a pull on OSB and EWP volume. So I really expect the market to remain, from a capacity-demand standpoint, tight for the rest of the year. You know, when we get to the winter, typically that has been a period of time where we see some inventory restocking happening, particularly on the OSB side. Some of that is dependent on building slowing during that part of the year. I just really struggle to see us getting too much of an imbalanced situation until we get to November. That's just my personal outlook on the capacity-demand ratio right now in the industry.
spk03: Yeah, no, I appreciate that, Collar. That's very helpful. Thank you, and good luck with everything.
spk08: Thank you, Susan. Thank you. Our next question goes to Mark Weintraub with Seaport Research. Can we proceed with your question?
spk05: Sure. Thank you. Congrats on another phenomenal quarter. A couple of mixed questions, too. On the OSB side, that's a big move towards structural solutions. Can you share with us what impact does that have on the business financially? Does it more reduce volatility or does it more increase margins? What type of color as you're increasing that percentage of the business to structural solutions can we see over time?
spk02: Two things. You mentioned both, but markets more improved and resilient margins. So one of the goals of our structural solutions push is to move into products that have a more sustainable incremental margin. And point there is that so that so that in a down OSP market and we have some margin resiliency around the structural solutions portfolio it does second as a secondary effect decrease volatility but but candidly we don't have enough of our structural solutions today that is disconnected in any significant way from random links commodity as a base pricing for the for that volatility to be impacted as much as we'd like it to be. And so it's more of a resilient margin play than it is a pricing volatility play. So there is some of that, like with FlameBlock, for example, we do price it off a price list. Some of the products that we have in our innovation pipeline, including this NovaCore product, we'll try to position it off of random, I mean, disconnect it from random, But, you know, for our big flooring SKUs and for TechShield, it's difficult to get that disconnection.
spk05: Okay, thank you. And Engineered Wood Plus, really nice pickup in earnings there. Any update on what's going on vis-a-vis the potential sale of the business and or change in thought process?
spk02: No change in thought process. We are running a process, and we are – you know, making progress on that process as we speak. So more to come on that morning.
spk05: Okay, super. I'll limit myself to one more, and then I'll get back in queue. But you talked about SmartSide being carbon negative. Can you give us a sense as to is that differentiated from alternative products that, you know, go into siting? And then also, is the OSB product, would that also be carbon negative?
spk02: Yes. So, Mark, we have a really good carbon story. And it's more than a story. It's reality when it comes to capturing carbon and nailing it up on the wall for a long time. In the case of siding with a 50-year guarantee, in the case of OSB, it's there as long as the home is there. And so, and being in this, you know, this composite wood business, you know, we are a carbon capture business. And, you know, we are very, from a carbon standpoint, our manufacturing process is rather friendly to that because we use almost all the material, 98 plus percent of the material that comes into the facility in the form of wood. And obviously, that is remarkably better than PVC siding or fiber cement. So from a carbon-friendly standpoint, like most of our competitors in the wood products business, we've got a really good story to tell there, and we think ultimately that will provide us a good competitive advantage as well.
spk08: Super. Appreciate it. Thank you. Our next question comes from Sam Stewart with TD Securities, and you proceed with your question.
spk07: Thanks. Good morning, everyone. A couple questions. With respect to input cost inflation, you gave us general trends for OSB and siding for overall year-over-year inflation. Can you give us a bit more granularity on how much of it was resin versus wood? And on resin specifically, Are there any issues securing supply right now? We're hearing that for other chemical inputs across the industry. I haven't heard anything with respect to resin, but is security of supply a concern at all?
spk02: I'll start with the security of supply. And while things are tight, I would say, you know, as we crossed into this quarter, we have not had any supply input challenges that we could manage through. So we feel like availability is good right now, or better than it's been in a while. Obviously, a hurricane in the Gulf can change that pretty quickly, but we haven't really had any supply chain issues as far as securing the material that we need. From an inflationary standpoint, most of that inflation has happened with resin. because it's an oil derivative, and most of those materials that we see big increases in that we've reported is due to the relationship to oil derivative and not driving that, mostly through index pricing. So on the wood side, we haven't seen significant stumpage price increases in North America, but obviously to get the material into the facility, the haul distances, the fact that it's on truck and primarily on trucks, some rail, diesel fuel pricing has impacted that. But I don't know if you want to add some more color to that.
spk04: Yeah, I mean, the primary source of the raw material increase is anything that is fundamentally oil-based. So, you know, our PMDI resin costs, you know, 55% or so. You know, wax that we use in siding is up 30-odd percent. So it's almost anything that is fundamentally oil-based is driving up the cost. There are some modest increases in the cost of fiber, but really the majority of it is oil-based, and it impacts, as I said, both the overlays, the papers, the waxes, the resins. So fundamentally, oil.
spk07: That's useful detail. Thanks very much. The second question, I just wanted to follow up on the structural solutions element of the OSB issue. business and you touched on the margin economics. I'm just trying to get a sense that the 55% of the mix that you reached in Q1, is there a target for the ceiling for that or the objective for that ratio and how fast do you anticipate getting there? If you could remind us of those dynamics.
spk02: Sean, we In 2017, we set a target at 50% as part of our strategic plan. In November, we revised that with our board to 75% of structural solutions. That's a three-year target from last year, setting it with our board. So we're full steam ahead on getting to 75%, and then when we get to 75%, we'll raise it again. And it would be awesome for LP to be in a position where and we're only running commodity OSB as basically between order changes at our facilities. And we're a way out from that, but that's certainly what we're focused on achieving ultimately. We want to add value. OSB is a great substrate. Obviously, we all know very vulnerable to commodity price swings, but it's a good substrate to build value off of. And as I've mentioned before on this call, you know, when you add an overlay or sand it or beef up the resin in the case of flooring, you know, you can get value there. And so we're really looking on the incremental margin as a value enhancer for our business.
spk07: That's great detail. Thanks very much, Brad. That's all I have.
spk08: Thank you. Our next question goes from Paul Quinn with RBC Capital Markets, and we proceed with your questions.
spk09: Yeah, thanks very much, Maureen, guys. I just want to start with siting. That siting 17% growth is pretty impressive given the managed order file. Just wondering where you're seeing that growth on a regional basis, which areas are sort of growing fastest and which areas are growing a little bit slower.
spk02: Off the board, Paul, except for one exception, we've seen really good growth year over year. So there's not a regional component that's any significantly stronger than another. And for most of the channel, it's pretty evenly distributed. We did see a softening off of the super good volumes last year in our consumer retail. No concerns there. It's just that we had such tough comps compared to Q1 of last year. But the strength is across the order file, both geographically and channel-wise or segment-wise. Q1 is a good inventory build for a shed, and so we saw that. So it's been really across the board, and Paul, if we had more volume to sell for this allocation issue, I think it could be even stronger. Maybe we don't have enough volume to be able to find where the different strengths and weaknesses are. It's just that across the board, our customers are taking all that we can allocate to them.
spk09: Okay, and then just in the whole startup set, it sounds like it's going well, and the linear projection, I guess with that 220 million square foot capacity, you expect to maybe produce just around 100 million square feet this year. Is it that that gets you the 20% growth in siding in 2022, or is it that plus running your existing mill charter as well?
spk02: There's two things that certainly the Holton volume helps, and you're ballpark right on your estimate for what the volume will be this year. But we've done a really good job, too, Paul, of getting all we can out of our system. And that's come from, you know, because we're on allocation, we can be a little more run optimal as far as the SKUs and the way we operate the facilities, the way we match what we produce to our ability to ship truck and rail into certain regions. And so we're optimizing our mill system to try to get just as much volume out incrementally as we can. Even though we're running at capacity, everything we have is running 24-7 except for scheduled maintenance or capital downtime. But our siting solutions team is doing a really good job of finding ways to get incremental volume out of the system through optimizing the order flow through the facilities. That's where we're seeing volume growth other than, of course, what we're going to get out of Holton.
spk09: Okay, so obviously this growth in siting is going extremely well. What competition areas are you running into in terms of other substrates? Is it vinyl in some markets? Is it fiber cement? Where's the competition for you?
spk02: Yeah, both of those. I mean, look in shed. And in DIY, there's still plywood, T111. We compete against every day, particularly in shed, as I mentioned. And then from a lap siding standpoint, it's vinyl and fiber cement. And then from trim, it's primarily actually solid sawn. Some PVC, some fiber cement, but solid sawn is a big part of the market that we compete against. So it depends a little bit on the product, but Yeah, it's plywood for the panels and then fiber cement and PVC for the vinyl for the lap and trim.
spk09: Okay, and then just last question, just on Segola, what's the capacity of that? Can you remind us again?
spk06: Hey, Paul, this is Aaron. It's about 420 for OSB, and as a siding metal, it'll be in the neighborhood of 3 to 320.
spk02: Oh, that'd be good to have that one online, yeah.
spk06: Definitely. Wish you had it right now.
spk02: That's all I got. Me too. Me too.
spk08: Thank you. Our next question comes from Ketan Mantour with BMO Capital Markets. He may proceed with your question.
spk01: Thank you. Can you give us a quick update on how Integra is performing?
spk02: Yeah. So, Integra, we continue to see good order intake for the facility. We are making progress operationally in the facility as well, though, you know, it's not where we want it to be. So, you know, I think the progress is slower. There's progress being made. It is slower than we would like to see. We're learning as we go, particularly, I mean, I'm kind of back to Paul's question on siting. The mix that we run through that facility has a significant impact on efficiency and cost. And so we're learning how to match that plant's capability to the reality of the market in the Northern California area. So I would say it's okay, Keaton, but it's slow progress towards a business that we would be ready to plow more capital into in order to grow it. We've still got some more to prove on the operations side.
spk01: Got it. Is there a way to kind of, you know, have some numbers around kind of what the revenues look like at this point, Brad?
spk02: Well, so we're talking around $93 million for the last 12 months. So the last 12 months is a trailing – well, it's not kind of. It is actually $93 million for the last 12 months, and we're losing a little bit of money in it.
spk01: Okay, that's – Understood. That's helpful, Kala. I'll turn it over. Good luck.
spk08: Thank you. Our next question comes from Mark Weintraub with C4 Research. You may proceed with your question.
spk05: Thanks. Three quick follow-ups. So, on Intecra, are we still expecting green light, red light sometime this year or not necessarily?
spk02: We are really focused on understanding our position in that business this year. Mark, and making the call on green light, red light, yellow light. Yeah, that's totally focused on that.
spk05: Okay. And second, on Segola, should we use a similar type of linear and expect order magnitude 150 million square feet? I realize it may start up a little bit later in the calendar, but about 150 million square feet for next year, or what would be a good ballpark?
spk02: Yeah, I'd say that's a good ballpark assumption for now, and As we get to the next quarter or two, Mark, if we need to refine that, we will. But, yeah, I agree that's a good number.
spk05: Super. And then lastly, Alan, I believe last quarter you talked about citing generally kind of maybe 25% EBITDA margins this year. You obviously came through with that in the first quarter despite some of the headwinds. Is that still a good number to use, or might there be reasons for it to be better or worse?
spk04: At the moment, I would say there's definitely a tailwind behind that long-term margin guidance, but I think that's the most that I'm going to say at the moment.
spk05: Okay. And when you say a tailwind, that was in terms of thinking about this year?
spk04: No, it was in terms of what our long-term margin for this business, for the deciding business, may be.
spk05: Okay. Maybe I misunderstood what you had said last time. I thought that was sort of a directional 420 thing.
spk08: 22 the 25 percent um what had you did i misinterpret no but it's still not unreasonable although i may have answered in the long term at the moment those aren't dissimilar okay super thanks very much thank you and as a reminder to ask a question you'll need to press star one on your cell phone our next question comes from john babcock with thankful america may proceed with your questions
spk10: Hey, so just sort of quickly touch on the structural solutions mix again. You know, there was a pretty big jump just from last quarter alone, and I was just wondering, so how much of this was driven by, you know, just the sheer lack of availability of other products? You know, I was wondering if that might have contributed to the mix this quarter or if there are any other factors at play here. You know, I also just want to generally get a sense for, you know, How we, you know, might think about this mix as the quarters go on. I would assume, you know, we might see some pullback from that 55% range. But I want to get any thoughts you could share there.
spk02: Yeah, good question. So several factors that helped. One is in these tight availability markets, we have the ability to push structural solutions, you know, into the market. People are willing to take what they could get. We did restructure our contracts or modify our contract volume for this year, again, to emphasize the structural solution product offering. And then also, let's not forget that, John, that Peace Valley, it does have a really good capability around TechShield, and that's a good product for the West Coast. So as we ramped into the Peace Valley ramp-up curve, we were able to ship go back into some markets on the West Coast where we had been strong in TechShield in the past. Now, look, Pace Valley still makes a lot of commodity, but certainly from an overall volume standpoint, for structural solutions, that didn't hurt. But it's really, you know, it's our strategy. Our product offering is extremely strong, but it is valid to assume that in a tight market, you know, we have some ability to stress that structural solutions are portfolio and get that into the market maybe a little more easily than we can in a down market.
spk04: But I might add that, as Brad said, the size of the increase year over year obviously is coming on the back of last year's resident problems. But we shipped over 500 million square feet, and Q on that is a record in an absolute sense.
spk10: Yeah, understood.
spk00: All right, that's all I have. Thanks.
spk06: Okay, well, seeing no further questions, we'll draw the call to a close there. Thank you, everyone, for joining us. This will conclude the first quarter earnings call for Louisiana Pacific, and we'll look forward to speaking with you again soon. Thank you, operator.
spk08: Thank you.
spk06: This concludes today's conference call.
spk08: Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer