Mach Natural Resources LP

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining today's call to discuss Mock Natural Resources' second quarter 2024 financial and operational results. During this morning's call, the speakers will be making forward-looking statements that cannot be confirmed by reference to existing information, including statements regarding expectations, projections, future performance, and the assumptions underlying such statements. Please note, a number of factors will cause actual results to differ materially from their forward-looking statements, including the factors identified and discussed in their press release this morning and other SEC filings. For further discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those in such forward-looking statements, please read the company's annual report on Form 10-K, which is available on the company's website or the SEC's website. Please recognize that, except as required by law, they undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. They may refer to some non-GAAP financial measures in today's discussion. For reconciliation from non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, please reference their press release, which is available on MOC's website, and their 10-Q, which will also be available on the website when filed. Today's speakers are Tom Ward, CEO, and Kevin White, CFO. Tom will give an introduction and overview, Kevin will discuss Mock's financial results, and then the call will be opened up for questions. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mr. Tom Ward. Tom?

Thank you, Kevin. Welcome to Mock Natural Resources' second quarter earnings update. I start each call describing our company framework or our four key pillars. These pillars are focused on being a distribution company as follows. Number one, maintain financial strength. Our goal is to have a long-term debt to EBITDA ratio of one times or less. By maintaining a low leverage profile, we give ourselves opportunities when markets experience high volatility. Number two, disciplined execution. We acquire only cash-flowing assets of a discount to PDP, PV10, that are accretive to our distribution. Number three, disciplined reinvestment rate. We maintain a reinvestment rate of less than 50% of our operating cash flow. By keeping our reinvestment rate low, we optimize our distribution to unit holders. Number four, maximize cash distributions. We target peer-leading distributions. This pillar drives all of our decisions. Now onto the second quarter results. In the second quarter, MOC averaged 89.3 MBOE per day of production. This production exceeded our high end of guidance. Our drilling program continues to perform in line with estimates. We achieved another quarter of successful expense and cost control. Lease operating expenses of $5.72 per barrel of oil equivalent were below the low end of guidance, and our new well costs have been below our initial projections, resulting in our drilling program dollars being vested more efficiently. We also divested a small portion of our western Andarco acreage for $38 million during the quarter. MOC controls approximately 1 million acres of land that are held by production. The Andarco Basin has become a focal point of many new and existing drilling programs, and these new ideas are spawning attractive prospects on lands that we have owned for several years. We're utilizing land as an asset that can be used in times of lower prices to enhance our distribution while not affecting our near-term drilling inventory. We captured some of the value from this asset in the second quarter by selling less than 13,000 acres in an area that we had not targeted for drilling. We continue to hold large land positions in the area for future development or divestiture. Also during the quarter, We used 21 million of cash to pay down existing debt. This debt payment was the first amortization payment on our first lien term loan. Lastly, we declared a quarterly cash distribution of 90 cents per unit. Mach is an acquisition company that focuses on investments accrued to our distribution. Through this model, we've been active acquirers since 2018. Over the past five years, we have actualized a multiple uninvested capital of 1.7 times. an average that cash received on capital invested of 31%, which we believe is best in class. Through 17 acquisitions, we've acquired vast land holdings that we did not pay for, but now have become valuable assets. In fact, we have many more potential drilling locations than we have operating cash flow to satisfy. Therefore, we have the ability to sell lands or grow our operating cash flow through acquisitions. We then use only 50 percent of our operating cash flow to drill with while distributing the remainder. In this way, we can pivot more towards drilling at times of higher prices when acquisitions become expensive, or more towards acquisitions in times of uncertainty. The largest driver to our distribution is the price we receive for our production. In the second quarter, we received a very low realized price of $1.33 per mcf for the natural gas we produce. Natural gas makes up 53% of our production and is important to our projected distributions. Obviously, we look forward to receiving a higher price for our natural gas production in the coming quarters than we received during this past quarter. Our drilling program continues to achieve results in line with our expectation. Mott currently has two rigs running. One of the rigs continues to drill the Oswego Formation in Kingfisher County, Oklahoma, and one rig is drilling the condensate window of Canadian County, Oklahoma. Since mid 2021, mock has drilled over 200 Oswego locations and continues to hold a large inventory of wells to be drilled. In the second quarter, mock spud 12 gross wells and brought online 14 gross operated wells across the combination of both areas. This drilling cadence is in line with our expectations through the end of 2024. Our CAPEX program continues to point towards a reinvestment rate of less than 50% of our operating cash flow for 2024. We reduced our rig count in the Oswego from two rigs to one rig during the quarter, which resulted in a reduction of CAPEX guidance by 15%. As mentioned earlier, our operations team continues to cut expenses on drilling, completions, and lease operating. We adjusted lease operating expense guidance down by 3% per BOE, Our drilling costs have improved due to efficiencies gained through days on location and cost cutting. We first projected our deeper locations in the condensate window to cost 8.6 million dollars per well and costs have been coming in at 7.6 million per well. This compares to our predecessor spending of 9.6 million per well. We moved our Oswego total cycle time per well down to 10.1 days and spend 2.6 million per location. We've added lateral length to further enhance our overall performance. Our average lateral length was extended from 5,400 feet to 6,000 feet during the quarter, and the overall cost was lowered by $32 per lateral foot. We continue to look for ways to lower expenses while maintaining our expected results per well. MOC's goal is to find the cheapest molecules to purchase and then convert those molecules into accretive distributions to our unit holders. In the past, the MidCon was the area where the most value could be found per dollar spent. Now the MidCon has become a highly sought-after drilling area. Therefore, the time has come for us to expand to other basins where production is less expensive for cash-flowing assets. We are actively reviewing projects outside of the MidCon as well as continuing to look at all MidCon opportunities. We believe in the next few quarters we will substantially add to our portfolio and distributions per unit. I'll now turn the call over to Kevin to discuss our financial results.

Thanks, Tom. I'd like to open with a quick reminder that the comparative income and cash flow statements for both the second quarter and year-to-date for last year reflect only the results of the predecessor entity, Mach 3, whereas the 2024 results capture all of the entities and assets of Mach Natural Resources. For the quarter, our production of 89,000 BOE per day was 23% oil, 53% natural gas, and 24% NGLs. Our average realized prices were $79.27 per barrel of oil, $1.33 per MCF of gas, and $23.83 per barrel of NGLs. Of the $232 million total oil and gas revenues, the relative contribution for oil was 65%, 15% for gas, and 20% for NGLs. On the expense side, as Tom has mentioned, our lease operating expense of $46.5 million, or $5.72 million, cents per BOE again came in lower than predicted and was a catalyst for us to lower full-year LOE guidance. Cash G&A was slightly over $9 million or only $1.12 per BOE. We ended the quarter with $145 million in cash. Our $75 million revolver was undrawn and our first lien term loan principal was approximately $804 million. Total revenues, including our hedges and midstream activities, totaled $240 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $136 million and $117 million of operating cash flow. After our CapEx for the quarter of $45.6 million, we generated $67.5 million of cash available for distribution, which we used to pay $21 million principal on the first lien term loan, and the remainder, plus the $38 million of proceeds received from the acreage sale mentioned earlier, gives us a total distribution of $85.5 million, or $0.90 per unit. This will be paid on September 10th to holders of record as of August 27th. Kevin, we'll turn the call back over to you to field questions.

Thank you. We'll now be conducting our question and answer session. If you'd like to be placed in the question queue, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. Our first question today is coming from Charles Mead from Johnson Rice. Your line is now live.

Yes, good morning, Tom and Kevin, and to the whole month team there. Tom, I wanted to ask about dropping the rig in the Oswego. It looks like you had a plan to drop that at some point this year, but with the CapEx guy down, you did it a little earlier than maybe contemplating your guidance from back in February. I wonder if you could characterize or tell me whether that's the right read on the change in your plan and give a little insight into your decision process about why drop the rig in 2Q as opposed to run it longer. Sure.

Sure. It's very simple. We want to stay under 50% capex to our operating cash flow. And so the Oswego rig, we had two Oswego rigs running. With that cut, then it moved us under 50% for the year of operating cash flow. I'd love to have two rigs running or three rigs running in Oswego once we get our operating cash flow up. Got it.

That's pretty simple. Thank you, Tom. And then the follow-up, you talked about your DNC performance versus acquisition case on those assets that you acquired from Paloma. I wonder if you could talk about the other side of the coin, how those wells are producing in the early days versus your acquisition case.

Yeah, in line with our acquisition case. And really anything we require that we drill on or new drills should just be in line with projections. Or if you look at Inverse or others, we shouldn't be outperforming others because usually we drill interior to other wells that have been drilled. So we don't do many step outs, thus selling the first part of the Cherokee acreage that we did because the wells are fairly new. So anything that we're drilling is in a fairly known area, and we really shouldn't outperform those around us. In fact, the risk would be that we have depletion, and so that's how come we're very careful with well spacing.

Got it. That is helpful insight. Thanks, Tom. You bet. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is coming from John Freeman from Raymond James. Your line is now live. Good morning, guys. Good morning.

First topic, you know, last quarter, Tom, you mentioned about the increased competition you've been seeing in Oklahoma and that, you know, others were willing to pay, you know, a substantial premium for, you know, undeveloped locations. And obviously you reiterated kind of those comments again on this call. And it sounds like what you're saying then is this, divestiture that you all did where you kind of took advantage of that kind of heightened competition by divesting some of those western anadarko package. It sounds like that may not be just a one-off that there could be opportunities in the future just given your massive acreage position to take advantage of that additionally going forward. Is that the right read?

Yes. So in the proven area of the At Cherokee Shale Play, we have probably another 40,000 acres inside of Mock and then inside of Oklahoma in the Cherokee overall area, closer to 100,000 total, including that 40, so 60,000 acres or so that are outside of the proven area and 40,000 in. As those wells are drilled, we only sold a small portion so we can watch wells that are being drilled and determine if they can then compete with other locations. The fact is that we have a large amount of locations to drill. and we need to increase operating cash flow in order to get to those locations. So we continue to look for ways to find PDP production or crude producing wells to bring in cash flow so that we can increase these proven locations we have in known areas with good rates of return. And the reminder is that we don't use our drilling program to try to grow our production. We use it to stabilize our declines.

Got it. And then, you know, you've talked in the past, Tom, about, you know, your bullish outlook on natural gas over the coming years with LNG, the increased kind of power burn, et cetera. As you kind of look at the gas strip and as we kind of start to roll through 2025, can you sort of talk about, you know, the flexibility that you've got on your properties from kind of a capital allocation perspective and maybe just some insight into how Is there a certain gas price level where you think you might shift more into some of your gasier assets?

Sure. It's all just rate of return driven. So we keep – we have a tremendous amount of acreage in the condensate window and then into the deep gas window if we choose to move that way. It's also in proven areas that have been drilled. So we watch pretty closely. The only issue we have is that we have two different types of rigs. We have a deep rig that works in the condensate and would also be in the deep gas window, and then the smaller rigs that work the Oswego or more up on the shelf. And so those are not interchangeable, but let's, for example, say that we got to a place that I think ultimately we'd like to have two rigs running in both areas. That's, I think, a near-term goal maybe in 2025 if we're fortunate enough to make some acquisitions that we're looking at.

Thanks, Tom. Nice quarter.

Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, that star 1 to be placed in the question queue. Our next question is coming from Michael Cella from Stevens. Your line is now live.

Good morning, guys. I wanted to try and understand your guidance a little bit better. Is that change on the production guidance going forward strictly due to the activity levels? And I think, Tom, you'd mentioned you expect the – The drilling, at least, to be similar for the second half of the year as it was in the second quarter, is that the same for the new wells you expect to turn in line? Is that kind of 12 net wells each quarter a good run rate for third and fourth quarter?

Yeah, this is Kevin, Michael, and yes, as far as the rate of drilling and the wells turned in line, I expect it to stay pretty consistent with what we had in the second quarter. And then you're spot on with regard to the reduction in the oil production guidance. You know, just as we, a couple things, we're dropping that down. rig late in the first quarter in the Oswego and then just combined with a little bit of delays in some of the deeper wells coming online is essentially what has driven that guidance down lower.

Okay, so nothing really with well performance that surprised you or the mix of oil versus gas. It was just the activity level.

That's correct.

Gotcha. And then, Tom, you mentioned the increased competition for deals within the basins got you thinking about or looking outside of the basin. Without giving away too much, can you say where you may be seeing opportunities where you don't have to pay for undeveloped acreage or at least characterize what kind of assets you might be looking for?

Yes, so we're just looking for cash-flowing assets. We have all of the drilling opportunities we need. So really, if we can buy something at less than PDP-PB10 that is a steeper discount than what we can find in Oklahoma and put that money, that operating cash flow, to work back into Oklahoma, into the line of drilling that we have. I think that's where we're searching. So anywhere that's dislocated could be for a number of reasons. You know, you might look in second tier, what would be considered second tier Eagleford or Permian. California is out of favor because of their regulatory environment. So, any of those types of opportunities to lower PDP, to where discounts to PDP are things we'll look at.

Appreciate the answers, guys. Excuse me.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Jeff Jay from Daniel Energy Partners. Your line is now live.

Hey, Tom. Hey, Kevin. It's kind of a curveball, but thinking very, very long term, obviously there's been a lot of attention to Refrax and kind of the Eagle for Bach and Barnett. I wonder if you think about your PDP assets over the next several years, if you think there might be an opportunity to do some Refrax on your acreage.

I've never had any luck with it. I don't know. Rick? Do you see? No. Rick's shaking his head.

Our accuracy doesn't really look like it could refract.

Maybe if other people came in and led the way. We will not be the instigator of refracting here. Excellent. Thanks, guys. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Jeff Robertson from Water Tower Research. Your line is now live.

Thanks. Good morning, Tom. On the competition question, do you anticipate more opportunities in 2025, 2026, as some of the consolidation that's taking place causes people to rationalize their portfolios? And then secondly, do you also think that would just bring in increased competition and have an impact on valuations?

Yeah, the mid-con right now is kind of the second hottest area for exploration that there is outside the Permians. It just has changed very quickly in the last six to eight months, something that surprises us. It's good for us because of how much acreage we have here, and as more people drill in different areas, it proves a lot of acreage of ours that we have held by production. But then I think the other part of the question is as consolidation happens, In the industry, people are looking new areas to go. They're looking more at the mid-con because it was a cheaper area than other areas with the same type of drilling upside. So I think that leaves us with maybe the ability to zig when others are zagging and move back into areas that are being left behind. That's our goal. Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. We've reached the end of our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any further or closing comments.

No more comments. We appreciate everybody's interest in the company and look forward to speaking soon. Thanks.

Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.