This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk03: Thank you for joining the Natural Resources Partners LP's second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question during this time, press star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you'd like to withdraw your line, press star 1 again. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. I will now hand today's call over to Tiffany Sammis.
spk06: manager of investor relations please go ahead thank you good morning and welcome to the natural resource partner second quarter 2022 conference call today's call is being webcast and a replay will be available on our website joining me today are craig nunez president and chief operating officer chris zolas chief financial officer and kevin craig executive vice president Some of our comments today may include forward-looking statements reflecting NRP's views about future events. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to materially differ from our forward-looking statements. These risks are discussed in NRP's Form 10-K and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. Our comments today also include non-GAAP financial measures. Additional details and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our second quarter press release, which can be found on our website. I would like to remind everyone that we do not intend to discuss the operations or outlooks for any particular coalesce or detailed market fundamentals. In addition, I refer you to CISAJAM resources public disclosures and commentary for specific questions regarding our soda ash business segment. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Craig Nunes, our President and Chief Operating Officer.
spk00: Thank you, Tiffany, and good morning, everyone. NRP generated $64 million of free cash flow in the second quarter, which when combined with the $52 million generated in Q1, resulted in the best start to a year in the history of the partnership. Performance over the last 12 months has been equally impressive, with our business generating $202 million of free cash flow. While inflationary pressures, weakening demand in China, the war in Ukraine, and slowing global economic growth pose increasing risks to our business, we believe the supply-demand balance for Metcold, thermal coal, and soda ash will remain well-supported relative to historical norms for the foreseeable future. We expect continued strong performance for the partnership in the second half of the year. In line with our long-term strategy, we are taking advantage of this opportunity to make significant progress toward our goal of becoming debt-free and redeeming our preferred stock, which will in turn maximize future free cash flow available for common unit holders. With the retirement of $118 million of debt in the second quarter, our leverage ratio ended Q2 at 1.2 times, a dramatic improvement from 4.6 times just 12 months ago. We remain committed to delevering and de-risking the partnership in the months ahead and have already retired an additional $39 million of debt so far in the third quarter. Metallurgical coal prices remain high by historical standards, and have been quite volatile in recent months, with benchmark prices down from record highs set earlier in the year. Slower global economic growth and falling demand for steel, particularly from China, are the key drivers behind the decline, with trade flow disruptions from the war in Ukraine and the ongoing Chinese import ban of Australian coals injecting additional uncertainty and volatility in the global market. After years of underinvestment and new capacity, MET producers continue to have difficulty bringing additional supplies online to replace maturing operations, and historically high thermal coal prices are pulling lower-quality MET coal into the thermal market, providing additional support to MET coal pricing. We believe the supply-demand balance for MET coal will remain well-supported for the foreseeable future, albeit with continued price volatility. Thermal coal markets continue to benefit from strong electric power demand and constrained growth in thermal coal supplies. Operators continue to struggle with labor shortages, supply chain disruptions, logistical challenges, and pressure from governments, regulators, activists, and financial institutions limiting their ability to increase thermal production to meet demand. The war in Ukraine and boycott of Russian coal exports are forcing European buyers to source coal from other regions. providing further support for U.S. thermal producers. We expect these factors to keep thermal prices and demand elevated for the foreseeable future. Our investment in Tsitsijam, Wyoming continues to benefit from historically high export soda ash prices. Though global soda ash demand has weakened modestly over the last month in response to slowing global economic growth, the industry remains supply constrained due to primarily to lingering COVID effects in China, a force majeure event at a competitor in Green River, Wyoming, and ongoing delays with shipping and logistics. Higher soda ash prices have more than offset cost inflation, resulting in higher margins and cash flow. We continue to believe the long-term outlook for SysAjam remains favorable given secular trends of renewable energy, the electrification of the global auto fleet, and urbanization. We continue working to identify opportunities on our large acreage footprint to capitalize on the transitional energy economy. As you'll recall, we announced our first forest CO2 sequestration transaction in the fourth quarter of last year and our first subsurface CO2 sequestration lease in the first quarter of this year. Consistent with our royalty business model, we anticipate little no capital investment will be required of NRP related to these opportunities. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Chris to cover our financial results.
spk01: Thank you, Craig, and good morning, everyone. During the second quarter, we generated $63 million of operating cash flow and $67 million of net income. Our mineral rights segment generated $70 million of our operating cash flow and $69 million of our net income in the second quarter. When compared to the prior year quarter, segment free cash flow and net income improved 39 million and 44 million respectively, primarily driven by stronger demand and pricing from metallurgical coal, which made up approximately 45% of our total coal royalty sales volumes and 75% of our coal royalty revenues during the second quarter of 2022. Moving to our soda hash business segment, Net income in the second quarter of 2022 was $15 million. This was a $12 million improvement compared to the prior year quarter, primarily driven by higher international sales prices. Free cash flow from our SOTASH business segment in the second quarter of 2022 improved $10 million as compared to the prior year period due to CISIJAM Wyoming reinstating its regular quarterly cash distributions beginning in the fourth quarter of 2021. Shifting to our corporate and financing segment, during the second quarter, we used free cash flow that had been generated from our mineral rights and sodash business segments to retire early $118 million of our 9-1-8 bonds to 2025 at a weighted average price of $102.275, a discount to the current redemption price of $104.563%. So far in the third quarter of 2022, we've retired an additional $39 million of the bonds. resulting in total redemptions of 157 million of these bonds, which will save us approximately $14 million in annual interest savings. We plan to strategically take advantage of our strong pre-cash flow generation to continue the leveraging and de-risking the partnership. Our corporate and financing segment costs for the second quarter of 2022 increased 4 million as compared to the prior year quarter, primarily due to costs associated with our early extinguishment of debt. This increase was partially upset by lower interest expense as a result of less debt outstanding compared to the prior year quarter. Corporate and financing segment free cash flow improved $1 million as compared to the prior year quarter, primarily due to lower cash paid for interest because of the less debt we had outstanding. Regarding distributions, in May of 2022, the partnership paid a quarterly cash distribution of 75 cents per common unit. and a quarterly cash distribution of $7.5 million to our preferred unit holders. And today, we announced distributions of 75 cents per common unit and $7.5 million of cash to our preferred unit holders to be paid later this month.
spk05: And with that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for questions. Thank you.
spk03: As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, press star 1 on your telephone keypad. Again, if you would like to ask a question, press star 1. If your question has been answered and you would like to remove yourself from the queue, press star 1 again.
spk05: Please hold for your first question. Your first question is from the line of Clay Nobler for Imperial Capital. Hi, guys. This is Amir.
spk02: Good morning, Craig and Chris. Great quarter. My question is, how should we think about the balance sheet? You guys are paying down debt aggressively. Is it now pretty much set in stone that you want to get rid of debt? basically have an equity capitalization.
spk00: Good morning, and thanks for your question. First of all, I would say, this is Craig, I'd say nothing's set in stone per se, but we see no change to the strategy that we've had now for going on five years. We've been quite clear on that we're going to use our internally generated cash flow really for three things. Number one, we attempt to provide distributions to our unit holders that are sufficient to cover their tax liabilities and that result from the taxable income generated at the partnership. But then we want to use the remainder of our free cash generated to pay down debt. And then at some point, we're going to start tackling the preferreds as well. In this environment and the trends that we see with respect to capital availability for companies that have exposure to fossil fuels such as us, we do not want to be relying in the future on the capital markets for funding, and so we want to eliminate those refinancing risks. We also believe that by deploying excess cash To pay off the bonds and to pay off preferreds, we are essentially earning a risk-free return on our money that ranges from 9% to 12% based on the stated coupon rates on those securities. So for the foreseeable future, that is our objective, is to continue to make sure our unit holders receive a distribution that provides for their tax liabilities at a minimum, and then we're going to still aggressively pay down debt and eventually tackle the preferreds, and the goal being that we will be a debt-free and preferred-free company at a point down the road, at which point we believe that there will be significant additional cash available for common unit holders.
spk02: That's great. My second question is regarding carbon sequestration. I know you've received, if I'm correct, $14 million so far. Are there any additional payments that you expect, or was that a one-time deal for now, and you'll see how it goes and whatever cash flow generation occurs maybe in the foreseeable future from it?
spk00: I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand. What were you asking about?
spk02: Carbon sequestration.
spk00: So we've done two carbon sequestration transactions to date. The first was a transaction where we agreed to sequester carbon in some forest lands that we own in West Virginia. for which we received just about $14 million last fall. And so that was a one-time transaction with respect to the $14 million. However, that forest that we have will continue to grow and mature. We do expect that over time, we will have the opportunity to agree with counterparties to sequester more carbon on that forest land, and we will be able to receive additional income in the future. but as the forest grows and sequesters more CO2. However, we don't expect to receive payments in the range of the $14 million that we received before, probably payments that are considerably less than that, maybe 5% or 10% of that on an annual basis. But that is dependent, of course, on the development of the carbon markets and the prices for carbon credits that are quite volatile.
spk02: Got it. I understand. Thank you very much. That's all I have.
spk00: Thanks for your questions.
spk03: Your next question is from the line of Mark Zinn from Wexford.
spk04: Greg, and hello, Chris. Could you, just going back to Amr's question about sort of the sequence of tackling the preferred, or excuse me, retiring the debt and tackling the preferred debt, In your mind, does all of the debt have to be gone before you tackle the preferred and then in order to tackle the preferred, is it simply calling it or is there some other option and what's the current call price on the preferred?
spk00: Sure. I'll take a stab at it and then let Chris chime in as well. By the way, good to hear from you. So we have stated for years now that our goal was to pay our debt to zero, then hit the preferreds. But we've also pointed out that there could come a point in time when our leverage becomes so low that it might make sense to go tackle the preferreds because the preferreds have a 12% coupon and our parent co-bonds, for example, have only a 9 and an 8 coupon. So we are continually evaluating whether to tackle the preferreds today or whether to buy bonds. So every time we make a decision to buy a bond back, we're comparing that to buying the preferreds. And that relates to the second question you asked, the follow-on part, which was what is the cost of buying the preferreds now? And that's an important factor in our decisions. There is a redemption premium, is one way to think of it, associated with the preferreds. And just like there's a call premium associated with calling bonds, there's a redemption premium with the preferreds. And it's quite sizable. at present. Currently, today, it's about 20%. So if we were to buy back, we were to redeem the preferreds by providing notice to the preferred holders that we wanted to redeem a portion of their preferreds, they would be required to sell it back to us. But we'd have to pay them the par amount plus about 20% premium on top of that. And so when you compare that to the market value of our parent co-bonds, as an example, Or the call premium of our parent co-bonds, say, at the end of October when it drops down to $102,500, I believe it is. And you do the math, it actually is more attractive at this point in time to buy down bonds than it is preferred, just from a mathematical standpoint. Additionally, you have the qualitative benefit that Bonds can default if your business turns south, and you'll be in an event of default, and it can undermine your business. Our preferreds have no events of default in them at all. So they are true equity securities, and they give us tremendous flexibility. We can just stop paying those distributions on the preferreds if we have to. Now, we certainly, at this point in our life evolution, we don't envision being in that type of a situation. but there's a qualitative benefit to having them as well. Now that redemption premium on the preferreds drops over time. Every quarter when we make a distribution to the preferred unit holders, it gets credited against that redemption premium. So each quarter, that 20%, what is now a 20% premium, will drop. And this next quarter, I believe it drops to perhaps 17%. And the quarter after that, it will drop a little bit further. So there's a point at which you come in the not-too-distant future where there's a – a crossover, as I like to call it, where it actually does get economically more attractive or at least as attractive to buy back the preferreds as the parent co-bonds. And then the real key is the qualitative factors that you have to weigh as to whether you want to retire back a dead instrument that hasn't been to default or whether you want to buy back a preferred, which... gives you significant equity flexibility. And then as far as the mechanics that you asked With the preferreds, it is simply providing them a notice that we plan to redeem portions of their preferreds. There are minimum amounts we have to redeem. I believe it's $25 million increments. All that's in the documents that are filed as record in our filings. But it's a pretty straightforward, simple process. We've not redeemed any preferreds yet yet. except for pick amounts that we had picked in earlier years that we later redeemed. But it's pretty straightforward. Chris, do you have anything to add on that?
spk01: No, I think you hit all the high notes on the preferreds. I think the only other thing, just to answer your questions, Mark, on our bonds, the current redemption price on our bonds is 104.563% of FAR. And as Craig alluded to, that call premium is drops in half at the end of October this year to 102.28% of par.
spk04: Okay, no, thank you. Just to kind of make it as simple as possible, though, it's a 12% preferred dividend. Would it be accurate, then, that each quarter the redemption price drops by 3%?
spk00: I think that's a decent rule of thumb, yes.
spk04: okay good enough for good enough for my purposes uh i guess i'm curious if there's anything uh oh can you pay any more than 75 cents on the common uh given the whatever limitations are in the preferred and the bonds or any other risk any other limitations or 70
spk00: At the current time, our leverage ratios and all of the credit metrics and statistics that we have to satisfy in order to have flexibility with distributions under the preferred documents are being met. So we don't have limitations per se on what we can pay out in distributions. Chris, any other comments on that?
spk01: That's exactly right.
spk04: Okay, well, good, good, good, good. Can you just make any comments on sort of the underlying business in terms of leasing activity? Is there anything going on or is pretty much everything leased and you're just sort of waiting for people to produce? Is anything being turned over or anything being turned back? Can you just give us any color on that?
spk00: Sure. And I think, Mark, your question is primarily directed to the coal space. Yeah, of course. It's interesting, but I have a comment outside the coal space regarding this question I'd like to make, too. But with regard to coal leases, no, we really don't have any new leases being put in place. We have a lot of lease amendments that are always required. going on with so many assets that we have, so many properties, so many lessees. There's always amendments that you're making to leases, and you may put a new lease in to replace that one, etc. But we're not seeing any – we don't have any company coming to us and saying, hey, we want to put in a new coal mine. And I think that's insightful because unlike operators, we've told you in the past, we really don't have as much insight into the markets and the trials and tribulations of the actual coal mining operation because we're just a lessor. But since we have such a broad, I'd say massive footprint in the coal space with our acreage and such a view of a breadth of operators just across the whole coal patch, We are able to see that the practical impact of the difficulty operators are having getting people and sourcing capital. We're just not seeing, based on the activity, the lack of new activity on our acreage, we're just not seeing that there's new supply coming on to meet the demand and the higher prices that we've seen over this last year. And that is something that is different from every other cycle in the past. And until operators are able to source capital, we hear this from all of our lessees, until they're able to get new capital to expand new mines, and in some cases when they have the capital because maybe they've gone through bankruptcy or they've run their business very well and they have no leverage to speak of, and they're generating a lot of free cash flow, a lot of times those are public companies, and they have their public investors tell them, we don't want you putting in new capacity. So we're not seeing new supply coming online. I do want to say, though, with respect to this question on our carbon neutral initiatives, we are seeing a significant amount of activity online. with multiple, numerous developers, would want to be developers for CO2 sequestration subsurface. We are having significant discussions with counterparties regarding our acreage footprint on that regard. And we hope to duplicate the transaction that we announced earlier this year with Denbarie in the future with others. But that's a whole new world. It's a brand new environment. The Denbury deal was probably the first of its kind ever, but certainly one of the first of the CO2 sequestration transactions of any scale, of that type of scale. So anyway, that's my comments. Kevin, do you have anything to add on the coal leasing?
spk05: No, Craig. I think you covered that very well. All right.
spk04: Can you remind me, Craig, when... I just... I don't remember. When do you expect to get money from Denver?
spk00: Well, we've not... We're under agreement not to disclose the terms of that, so I'd prefer not to... So we're not allowed to tell you about the early payments we received, et cetera. I will say, though, that... It's fair to say that the development of that nature will likely take anywhere from three to five years before you will have what I will call first production, first injection. So you start receiving monies from injection. There are, of course, bonus payments and rental payments that we receive before injection. before production. So I don't want to get into the details of that.
spk04: That's fine, thanks.
spk00: I think it's fair to say, to give you clarity on that, I would say you want to assume you've got to look out five years before you start, before the potential for what I will call, I don't know if material is the right word, or significant potential cash flows is the right word.
spk05: All good.
spk04: I assume that you're not contemplating doing any more deals where you basically finance infrastructure.
spk00: Is that correct? That's correct.
spk04: Craig, good to get caught up. Thanks very much.
spk05: Thank you, Mark. Take care.
spk03: At this time, there are no further audio questions. I will now hand the call back over to Craig Nunes for any closing remarks.
spk00: Thank you, operator. And I'd like to thank everyone for participating in the call today. We're firing on all cylinders right now. It's a good time in the business. Everyone in the sector is in coal sector and the sodash space is doing well now. Rising tide has lifted all boats. So it's a nice time to be invested in NRP. But I do want to thank all of you that have been with us for quite a while. It's been a significant journey here over the last seven years that we've had together. And a number of you that are on this call and that will be reading the transcripts later I know have been stakeholders in NRP throughout that entire time. And you've re-upped at times when you've had the opportunity to do so. I'm glad to see that things are paying off for you now. And I hope that you'll continue to stick with us because I do think the future is bright for NRP. And I think we are very well positioned for whatever comes next with the evolution of the global economy and the transitional energy economy. So with that, thank you, and look forward to speaking with everyone next quarter. Thank you, operator.
spk03: You're welcome. This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.
Disclaimer