This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk04: All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star, followed by number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. I would now like to turn the call over to Tiffany Samus, manager of investor relations. Please go ahead.
spk01: Thank you. Good morning and welcome to the Natural Resource Partners Third Quarter 2024 Conference Call. Today's call is being webcast and a replay will be available on our website. Joining me today are Craig Nunes, president and chief operating officer, Chris Zolis, chief financial officer, and Kevin Craig, executive vice president. Some of our comments today may include forward-looking statements reflecting NRP's views about future events. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to materially differ from our forward-looking statements. These risks are discussed in NRP's form 10K and other securities and exchange commission filings. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. Our comments today also include non-GAAP financial measures. Additional details and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our Third Quarter press release, which can be found on our website. I would like to remind everyone that we do not intend to discuss the operations or outlook for any particular coalesce or detailed market fundamentals. Now I would like to turn the call over to Craig Nunes, our president and chief operating officer.
spk07: Thank you, Tiffany, and good morning, everyone. NRP generated $55 million of free cash flow in the Third Quarter and $263 million of free cash flow over the last 12 months. While we realized lower prices for metallurgical and thermal coal during the quarter and significantly lower prices for soda ash, we continued to generate robust free cash flow and make noteworthy progress toward our goal of eliminating all financial obligations. Notably, we paid off the remaining $32 million of preferred securities during the quarter and are now free of all preferred and warrant liabilities. As of today, our total remaining financial obligations, which consists solely of debt, stand at $181 million, a decrease of 44% from one year ago. While we believe the current market softness for our key commodities will persist for the foreseeable future, resulting in a material drop in our expected free cash flow as compared to the last 12 months, we remain on track with our deleveraging plan. We will continue to pay down debt with internally generated cash in the coming months and look forward to the day when common unit holders will have no competing claims on the partnership's free cash flow. We remain steadfast in our belief that this is the best strategy to maximize intrinsic value per unit. Additionally, in October, we closed a five-year bank credit facility that extends our revolver's maturity date over two years to October, 2029. This extension provides us with greater financial flexibility and further de-risks our capital structure. We have an exceptional group of banks that have become more than lenders. They are trusted business partners. Our mineral rights segment generated $54 million of free cash flow during the third quarter. Soft global steel demand continues to pressure metallurgical coal prices and low-priced North American natural gas and high coal inventory levels at electric generating facilities continue to depress thermal coal prices. We do not expect material market improvement in the near term. Longer term, we believe secular demand trends for steel, industry labor shortages, higher cost of production, and limited investment in new coal supply will provide support for metallurgical prices at attractive levels when compared to historical norms. Long term thermal prices should benefit from input cost inflation, labor shortages, and limited new investment. But we expect the positive impact on thermal prices from those factors to be more than offset by the continued long term secular decline in North American thermal demand. Turning to soda ash, we received a $6 million cash distribution from CISJAM Wyoming in the third quarter of 2024, which is $17 million less than the distribution received for the third quarter of last year. This decline reflects significantly lower soda ash prices resulting from the massive influx of new soda ash production capacity over the last 18 months and softening demand for flat glass used in construction and automobiles. Soda ash prices are at their lowest levels in decades and while our long term outlook remains quite positive, we believe it will take several years for the market to reach an equilibrium that supports the higher price levels realized for most of the last decade. As a result, we expect distributions from CISJAM Wyoming to remain below historical norms for the foreseeable future. While our near term soda ash outlook may appear more pessimistic than that of others, we prefer to plan conservatively and be pleasantly surprised if the market outperforms our expectations. Long term, our soda ash facility remains one of the world's lowest cost producers of a commodity that has favorable fundamentals linked to growth in renewable energy, the urbanization of society and the electrification of the global auto fleet. These characteristics provide one of the most durable, competitive moats that we've seen in a commodity producer. Regarding our carbon neutral initiatives or CNI for short, we continue to explore opportunities to lease our mineral and surface assets for underground CO2 sequestration, forest CO2 sequestration, lithium production and the generation of electricity using geothermal wind and solar energy. We have observed a notable slowdown in the leasing of acreage for underground CO2 sequestration. Project developers are reluctant to invest capital in light of the uncertain regulatory and political environment. On a positive note, we are seeing increased leasing activity by lithium, solar and geothermal developers. While upfront lease bonuses from individual lithium, solar and geothermal leases are not material to the overall partnership, we do see these as positive steps in the expansion of our CNI portfolio. And with that, I'll turn it over to Chris to cover our financial results.
spk06: Thank you, Craig. In the third quarter of 2024, NRP generated 39 million of net income, 54 million of operating cash flow and 55 million of free cash flow. Our mineral rights segment generated 41 million of net income and 54 million of both operating cash flow and free cash flow during the third quarter of 2024. When compared to the prior year quarter, our mineral rights segment net income decreased 20 million and both operating cash flow and free cash flow decreased 7 million. These decreases were primarily due to soft coal markets resulting in lower metallurgical and thermal coal sales prices. Regarding our third quarter 2024 net thermal coal royalty mix, metallurgical coal made up approximately 75 percent of our coal royalty revenues and 55 percent of coal royalty sales volumes. Shifting to our soda ash business segment, net income in the third quarter of 2024 was 8 million, a decrease of 4 million compared to the prior year quarter. This decrease was due to lower sales prices driven by an oversupplied market and weakened demand for construction flat glass. Free cash flow from this segment was 6 million in the third quarter of 2024, a decrease of 17 million as compared to the prior year quarter. Soda ash pricing has declined from the record high scene last year and until demand for flat glass rebounds and the market is able to absorb the additional supply from China, we expect prices to remain muted and our distributions received from Sijian, Wyoming, to reflect the business performance. Moving to our corporate and financing segment, in the third quarter of 2024, we achieved another milestone towards our goal of eliminating our financial obligations by redeeming the final 32 million of outstanding preferred units. I'm pleased to note that we were able to redeem all of the originally issued 250 million preferred units at par with cash. Having the preferred units redeemed saves us $30 million in annual cash flow compared to when all of the originally issued preferred units were outstanding. We're also pleased to have settled the final tranche of outstanding warrants last quarter. In aggregate, we settled the originally issued 4 million warrants with $131 million of cash and by issuing just under 288,000 common units. For your reference, if all of the originally issued warrants were still outstanding today, this settlement amount would be approximately 265 million or 2.8 million common units. As a result of accomplishing these milestones, our remaining financial obligations consist only of debt and sit at just under 200 million at the end of the third quarter. As of today, our debt balance is 181 million as we continue to make progress, paying down our credit facility with internally generated free cash flow. And just last month, we further de-risked the partnership by menning our 200 million credit facility, which lengthened the runway of liquidity available to us by over two years to October, 2029 and gives us greater financial flexibility. For the segment's third quarter, 2024 financial results, net income, operating cash flow, and free cash flow, each decreased 1 million compared to the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of higher interest expense and cash paid for interest due to the increased barrings outstanding on the credit facility in 2024 that were used to permanently retire the preferred units and warrants. And lastly, regarding our quarterly distributions, in August of 2024, we declared and paid a first quarter distribution of 75 cents per common unit and a $1 million cash distribution to our preferred unit holders. And today we announced our third quarter distribution of 75 cents per common unit to be paid later this month. And with that, I'll turn the call back over to Danica, our operator, for questions.
spk04: Thank you. At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. We will pause for just a moment to compile our Q&A roster. It looks like we have one question from Mark Zand with Wexford. Please go ahead.
spk05: Greg, how you doing?
spk07: Hello, Mark, how are you? We're doing
spk05: well. We're good. It's good to hear you and congratulations. I missed the very beginning of the call, so I'm unclear on what exactly you need to do, if anything, in order to basically be unconstrained in your ability to pay dividends. I had heard part about wanting to pay down debt, but with the redemption of the preferred and the extinguishment of the warrants, is it just your desire? Just explain to me what your thoughts are going forward in terms of distributions.
spk07: Our goal is still to get to the point where we have eliminated or practically eliminated all of our liabilities, which currently stand at $181 million of debt before we consider doing other things with the free cash that we have generated. And as we've talked to you about in the past, we're not making forecasts of this specific date that we believe that that will happen. But it is, you can look at our run rate of cash flow, free cash, and you can look at the outstanding balance and you can see that we appear to be coming up on the cusp of reaching that point.
spk05: So is your goal really to get debt down to zero?
spk07: Well, yes, that is our goal. But the reality of it is that does it have to be exactly zero? Could it be $10 million? Sure, could be $10 million. Close to zero. Okay.
spk05: And then do you have a sense on what your payout policy would be after that?
spk07: No, we don't have a, we're not gonna tell you here in advance, a year in advance potentially, we're not gonna tell you now what, or decide now what our distribution policy will be. But I do think that we will approach it the same way we've approached distributions for the last 10 years, and that is, do we have a more intelligent use for the cash than paying it out as distributions to owners? And up to this point in time, we believe we have had a more intelligent use for the cash, be it redeeming 12% of preferreds or 10% debt or et cetera. When we get to the point where our debt balances are zero or practically zero, and we don't have as many opportunities to do more intelligent things, the decision to make a distribution becomes much easier. I would just say that we do not have a bias against distributions at all. The bias is that we need to have an intelligent use for the money internally to increase intrinsic value of the business, or else we send it out.
spk05: Okay, I mean, do you have any sense that you would do, that there'd be some line of business that you would invest in, something that you would use the cash for other than a distribution, and if so, what might it possibly be?
spk07: Do not have any ideas about that at the moment, and do not have any plans at the moment. Right now, we're trying to finish out the strategy that we've had in place for a long time, and as we get a little bit closer to the end of that process, we will be looking at the next step, and we'll be explaining to the public quite clearly what we plan to do at that time.
spk05: How many shares of stock are outstanding now, I guess, after the redemption of the warrants and so on?
spk07: Roughly 13.3 million.
spk05: Okay, that makes sense. Can you, and I don't know if anybody else has got any questions, but let me just ask one final one, and we can see. You'd said that you expect the sort of weak conditions in the Med-Call market to persist for an extended period of time. Could you just elaborate on what your thoughts are on the market?
spk07: Yes, we have excess capacity, and we have sluggish demand in all three of our key commodities. That's metallurgical coal, sub-ash, and thermal coal, and at the moment, I can't see any specific drivers that are going to change this environment here in the near to intermediate future. Now, I'm always surprised about that because I never do see the drivers that are gonna turn the market for these commodities, but they eventually do turn, but just right now, I cannot point to any of that. The good news that I think would be important to note here for us is that despite the fact that this is the, a very negative time in terms of the collective sentiment of all three of our, and the collective outlook for all three of our key commodities, it's actually a pretty robust time for the business outlook for our common equity. Simply because of the fact that we are coming to the end of eliminating our obligations, at which time there'll be a lot of free cash that's freed up for common equity. So it's sort of a tale of two cities. The bad time for the business outlook, actually collectively for all three of our commodities together, I would say that with the exception of COVID, this is the worst collective business outlook we've had in my almost 10-year tenure here at NRP, but it's certainly the best outlook from the standpoint of an equity holder that we've had in the almost 10 years that I've been at NRP. Yep,
spk05: well, you've gotten everything fixed. It's taken a while, but it's done, so congratulations.
spk07: Well, and thank you for that, but also thanks to all of our stakeholders and to you and everyone who's supported us along the way.
spk05: No, well, good for you. Thank you, and I'll just listen to you if anybody else has any questions, thanks. Thank you, Mark.
spk03: All right, our next question comes from John Mason with Aegis Companies, please go ahead.
spk08: Hey guys, thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to ask really quickly, how strict is the plan to eliminate all debt, including both the facility and the senior notes before you initiate a return to capital? I know you just mentioned it doesn't have to be zero. I'm just trying to understand the order of priority and the capital allocation flexibility, given how attractive the yield and the common is now, especially relative to the senior notes. Could you pay off the facility and just begin distribution then and let the senior notes roll off at maturity, I think in like December of 26? Or, I mean, if it is really strict on, we wanna get to that 10 or basically zero number first, totally understand this one to get a sense.
spk07: No, no, it's not that strict. It is as you described actually, we're gonna use a common sense approach and we're gonna pay off the highest cost debt first. And then when we, yeah, so it's a common sense approach. It's not strict to the penny. Great, thanks so much. You bet.
spk03: All right, we have a question from Neil Patel with Sawgrass Beach, please go ahead.
spk02: Good morning, everyone. Craig and Chris, thanks for answering my question, responding to my question. Very impressed with all the work you and the team have done over the past few years in terms of deleveraging and sticking to that discipline. So curious about, as now you kind of have the preferreds and the warrants out of the way and are now deleveraging debt at a rapid speed, if there's any thought put into repurchasing common units, especially when the current kind of yield as I'm calculating it could be around 15% or more. So curious, I know there's some language that's changed within the most recent credit agreement. Not sure if that's related, but it's mentioned equity interests. So curious about your philosophy on that, just given where the price is. And I know you've all bought back warrants kind of what the price was earlier in the year.
spk07: This is Craig, I'll take a first stab at that. In answer to your question, have we thought of and do we consider and would we consider in the future repurchases of units if they traded in material discounts to our estimates of intrinsic value? The answer is yes. I do wanna clarify, you made a comment about a 15% yield. I wanna clarify that what I believe you're referring to there is our free cash flow yield. It is not our actual current yield of our common equity at this point in time. Just wanted to clarify that. And then third thing, you mentioned the credit agreement. Yes, you did pick up on that. There were two main reasons to put the new credit agreement in place that Chris and his team did. The first was to extend the maturity to get us a longer period of time to a longer maturity. The second was to loosen up some of the handcuffs that had been put in place when we were a less credit-worthy borrower. And the loosening of the handcuffs frees up, makes it easier for us in going forward to do things such as repurchase units.
spk00: Got it. Thank you. You bet.
spk03: All right, at this time, I will now turn the call back over to
spk04: Craig Nunes for closing remarks.
spk07: Thank you very much, Danica. And thank everyone for participating in our call today. And thank you for your continued support of NRP.
Disclaimer