This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Welcome to the Pebble Brook Hotel Trust first quarter earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If you would like to ask a question, you may press star 1 on your telephone keypad. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star 0 on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Raymond Martz, Chief Financial Officer Thank you, sir. Please go ahead.
spk08: Thank you, Donna. And good morning, everyone. Welcome to our first quarter 2021 earnings call and webcast. Joining me today is John Bortz, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. But before we start this morning, quick reminder that many of our comments today are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. These statements are subject to numerous risk and uncertainties as described in our 10-K for 2020. Our other SEC reports and future results could differ materially from the those implied today by our comments. Forward-looking statements that we made today are effective only as of today, April 30th, 2021, and we undertake no duty to update them later. Our SEC reports and our earnings release contain reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures we use, which are available on our website at pebblebrookhotels.com. When discussing our financial and operating results, we will in many cases also compare our first quarter results to the first quarter of 2019. We believe this is a more accurate representation of the comparable operating and financial performance rather than comparing to 2020. We provided these comparative performance measures for 2021, 2020, and 2019 in the financial statement tables as part of the press release we filed last night. Okay, on to the highlights of the first quarter. Last year this time, hotel demand was virtually zero. We only had eight of our hotels open. We were burning between $25 and $30 million of cash per month, and we also had about $450 million of liquidity. Today, about a year later, we have 48 hotels open, 11 more than when we started the year, and eight more since last quarter. In March, for the first time since the pandemic began, we achieved positive hotel EBITDA for the month. This exceeded our expectations due primarily to greater pickup in March from an extended spring break. Our total corporate cash burn in March was approximately 12 million, a significant improvement from January and February when we averaged over $21 million per month. And today we have over $900 million of liquidity. Progress on vaccinations combined with significant pent-up leisure travel demand provides us with more confidence and optimism in the path of recovery despite business travel and group demand still way off pre-pandemic levels. The crisis is far from over. but the hotel industry and our portfolio are heading in the right direction. And trends are improving monthly, which is very encouraging. As our song from the 70s indicated, yesterday is gone and tomorrow should be better. Same property total revenues of 83.2 million were 74.7% below the first quarter of 2019, but marked a 12.3% improvement from the fourth quarter of 2020 with revenues of 74 million. You'll recall when we spoke two months ago, we thought the first quarter would be slightly below the fourth quarter. Total hotel level expenses of 99.3 million were reduced by 58.5% versus Q1 2019. Expenses before fixed costs like property taxes and insurance were cut by 66.6% versus Q1 2019. Our total property level expense reduction was 78% of the revenue decline and 89% before fixed expenses. This highlights the tireless efforts of our operating and asset management teams who have been focused on maintaining enhanced cleaning and safety protocols for our guests and hotel team members, while also instituting cost controls and implementing new best practices to improve efficiencies. Our hotel operating teams are also trying to overcome the challenge we are experiencing with a lack of available workers in every market. We expect the shortage of hotel workers to remain a challenge for several months, but improve in September. As enhanced unemployment benefits are due to run out, children should be back in school full-time, and the fear of the virus is dramatically reduced due to widespread vaccinations. On a same property route part basis versus a comparable period in 2019, January was down 83%, February was down 76.4%, and March was down 70.2%. which represented the best performing month since the pandemic started last March. For the second quarter, we currently expect RepR to be down between 66 and 70% compared with the comparable period in 2019, which continues the improving trend. Our total portfolio generated 19.4 million of revenue in January with 37 hotels open, 26 million in February with 38 hotels open, and 38.1 million in March with 39 hotels open. We forecast revenues of approximately 42 million for April, slightly up for March with 44 hotels open. That 44 excludes the additional four hotels we reopened near the end of the month. Please keep in mind that as these last hotels reopen, they open with lower occupancies and they're reopening in lower occupancy and slower recovering markets. So ADRs also will be at lower levels. So they weigh down our overall statistics but increased our total revenues and hotel EBITDA numbers. For the first quarter, same property hotel EBITDA was negative 16.1 million compared with a positive 89.4 million from Q1 2019. However, it does mark an improvement from the fourth quarter of 2020 when we had a hotel EBITDA loss of 19.1 million. By month, same property hotel EBITDA was negative 11.4 million in January, negative six million in February, and positive 1.3 million in March. Our eight resorts have been the consistent bright spot in a portfolio throughout this pandemic, whether summer, fall, winter, or spring. They generated a positive $14.5 million of hotel EBITDA in quarter. This resulted from an occupancy of 41% and an average daily rate of $406, which was more than $93 and a 30% increase over the comparable 2019 first quarter. Vend at our resorts was also up meaningfully over the comparable period in 2019, resulting in total revenue per occupied room higher by more than 10%. As a reminder, leisure transient portfolio-wide has historically accounted for about 40% of our demand, with corporate transient at 35% and group at 25%. Not only do our drive-to resorts benefit from strong leisure, but all of our urban markets have strong leisure components. and markets like San Diego and Los Angeles are benefiting now. Washington, D.C., Boston, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Chicago, and Philadelphia should also benefit from this summer assuming the amenities and tractions are open in those markets. Our adjusted EBITDA was negative 25 million in the first quarter compared with a positive 90.5 million in Q1 2019. Despite the seasonally slower first quarter, This is an improvement compared with the negative 27.9 million of adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter ending December 31st, 2020, and shows a positive direction of the portfolio. Adjusted FFO per share declined to a negative 42 cents per share compared with a positive 46 cents per share in Q1 2019. Shifting to our capital improvements, during the first quarter, we invested 9.6 million in our portfolio. About a third of this capital was related to the redevelopment of La Berge in Del Mar, California. This transformation is expected to be completed several weeks, and the new lobby, outdoor restaurant, new cafe, and renovated rooms have reopened. For 2021, we anticipate investing an additional $60 to $80 million for a total of $70 to $90 million in our portfolio. We've decided to move forward on the $25 million redevelopment of Hotel Vitality in San Francisco into the one hotel. We will start this renovation later this summer and target to complete it by year end. As a result, we will keep Hotel Battaglia closed for the rest of this year to complete the redevelopment and transformation with less disruption than if the hotel was open. This will also allow us to complete the renovation more quickly and at a lower cost. We will also be moving forward on the $5 million redevelopment and renovation of the Grafton on Sunset in West Hollywood, California. We expect to start this renovation in the fourth quarter with completion in the first quarter of 2022. We will relaunch this hotel as the eighth member of the unofficial Z collection upon its completion with the new Z name yet to be finalized. Our decision to ramp up our reinvestment projects are a very positive indicator of our confidence in the direction of the travel recovery that is beginning to take hold and our strong overall financial condition and resources. We want our hotels to be in a position to take advantage of the substantial step-up in travel and hotel demand that we expect in 2022 and beyond, which is why we are moving forward with these renovations, which are transformational and should lead to outsized cash flow growth. Shifting to asset dispositions, on April 1st, we announced we completed the sale of the Sir Francis Drake Hotel in San Francisco. We generated approximately 157.6 million proceeds from the sale. Since the second quarter of 2020, we completed approximately $225 million of property dispositions. We intend to strategically reallocate this capital into new investment opportunities that we believe will provide enhanced returns and greater diversification for our portfolio as the opportunities become available. Turning to our balance sheet and liquidity, with the proceeds from the recent sale of the Sir Francis Drake, we have more than $920 million of liquidity. This includes cash of $279 million and $643 million available under our unsecured credit facility. Our net debt to book value is approximately 42% and excluding our convertible notes, which can be converted to common equity when our common share price exceeds $25.47 per share, this ratio is 27%. We're proud of the tremendous progress we've made strengthening our balance sheet, reducing near-term debt maturities, and increasing our liquidity. This should allow us to take advantage of new investment opportunities as they become available. With that, I now turn the call over to John. John? Thanks, Ray.
spk10: So I thought I'd focus on what we're currently seeing in our business and how we think this year is likely to play out now that it seems we have perhaps a more predictable path, though it continues to be a path with quite a lot of uncertainty. None of us has ever been through a pandemic. So the big variables include the progress we make against the virus, both here and around the world, and then how governments, individuals, and businesses in particular behave as the health issues recede, assuming we have no setbacks. We're certainly very encouraged by the reduction in our country's daily cases, hospitalizations and deaths, and the pace and general level of vaccinations. This year's recovery is being led by the leisure traveler who continues to be most of the demand currently traveling. While all segments will increase as the year goes on, leisure travel is a segment that is likely to remain the driving force behind the recovery for the second and third quarters as government restrictions ease and as more and more people feel safe and comfortable traveling. In fact, We've already seen the leisure recovery pick up speed since the beginning of the year when it was at its low point. Not only did occupancy pick up in February and March, but overall bookings consistently increased through the entire first quarter, including for future months. For us, demand consistently increased throughout all of our markets. For example, total hotel revenue per day in February averaged about 49% higher than in January, and March increased another 32% from February. And April is forecasted to be up another 17% from March based on the first 25 days of the month. Room revenues have improved even more. Average daily room revenues increased 55% from January to February, another 35 percent from February to March, and we're forecasting they'll be up another 17 percent from March to April, again, based on the first 25 days of the month. While the nominal numbers are still very low, averaging about $1.2 million per day in March for total revenues, the improvement in transit demand and occupancy have clearly been significant. Except for periods following holidays, our total transient bookings have increased week over week just about every week this year. We're also encouraged that we're seeing forward transient bookings pick up as well, as the leisure customer feels increasingly confident booking vacations and leisure trips further out than they've been doing so far during the pandemic. When it comes to rates, We've seen consistently strong growth in ADRs at our resorts, with seven of eight of them achieving significant increases over 2019 levels. In the first quarter, average rate at our resorts on a combined basis increased $93.88 over 2019's first quarter, or a whopping 30.1%. Weekday rate growth at our resorts was even stronger than weekend rate growth, up 31.5% on weekdays versus 20.6% on weekends. The leisure customer has plenty of money to spend, and a greater number are choosing upgraded and more expensive room types, including view rooms and suites, and this is helping to increase average rates. While the same cannot be said for rate growth at our urban hotels, The strength of our resort portfolio has been so great that it dramatically mitigated the urban rate decline of 31.5%. This decline was less on the weekends than on the weekdays. Not surprisingly, given our traditional weekday high-rated business in our urban markets comes from citywide conventions, corporate group, and business transients, all segments traveling in a very limited amount during the first quarter. Yet because of the huge rate increases in our resort portfolio, the entire portfolio only experienced a 4.7% rate decline from 2019's Q1. And we continue to focus our revenue management efforts on recovering ADR in our urban markets, particularly as demand improves. During last September and October, we saw the beginnings of a modest recovery in business travel. However, with the rise in the virus's spread, increased government restrictions, and the arrival of winter, transient business travel slowed significantly in the first half of Q1. We're encouraged that we've begun to see some business travel return again. Some examples include TV, movie and music production in LA, consultants, health care, pharmaceutical, and IT-related project travelers in various markets, including Boston, and some government, as well as sports and entertainment throughout the portfolio as those event venues reopen again with spectators and fans. We've also had some corporate groups actualize, primarily in Florida, including incentive groups and strategic planning meetings. We expect to see a gradual improvement in business travel over the course of the year, but we don't really expect a major increase until after Labor Day in early September. Growth in business travel between now and Labor Day will likely come from private businesses and small to medium-sized public companies. We've also hosted many social groups at our properties, especially related to weddings. In fact, wedding bookings for the second half of the year continue to pick up, and we may see a record number of weddings in the second half. In the first quarter, group accounted for 10.2% of our total room revenues. This does not include the university student business at the WBoston, but does include airline crew business throughout the portfolio, representing over 4% of total room revenues. Corporate group represented a little over 2% of total room revenues in the quarter. There are also a significant number of groups that have or intend to rebook into the second half of 2021 and into 2022 as well. We're very encouraged about how well Group is shaping up for 2022 at this point. While 2022 PACE continues to be significantly behind the PACE in 2018 for 2019, not surprisingly, it's down 28% in room nights. Activity has definitely picked up as meeting planners return to work and become more confident about holding meetings. There's more clarity and optimism on success against the virus, with restrictions on meetings being loosened or dropped altogether, and that's providing more comfort that groups will be able to meet or hold their events after they do book their business. Equally encouraging is that rate is holding as well. Our group rate for 2022 is currently ahead by 3.8%, versus the same time in 2018 for 2019, which was our last normal pre-pandemic year. When we look at the second half of 2021, we're definitely much more cautious about group and trying to forecast when businesses will move forward and meet in person. In the last four months, we're encouraged by the continuous improvement in activity related to the number of leads, site tours, discussions, and group bookings throughout our portfolio. Nevertheless, overall activity levels, especially bookings, are not yet at the levels of 2019, and they certainly vary meaningfully from market to market. Our group pace for the second half of 2021 is down roughly 45%, with ADR about flat, which is very encouraging. Group rates have generally held up or been rolled forward from previous bookings, and some have even increased if they've moved from a seasonally lower rated time of year to a seasonally stronger time of year. We certainly hope group will begin to pick up as the year moves along and progress continues against the virus. However, we're concerned that businesses will be more cautious about meeting this year, particularly before Labor Day. There are glimpses of hope, however, including the concrete citywide to be held in Las Vegas in June. Seems like a pretty scary idea, concrete in Vegas. Nevertheless, we should go forward. We have the ALICE convention scheduled for late July in LA, which should go forward if California and LA reopen. as announced and allow such a large conference. And I'm sure there are many other examples, so we'll get a better view of the willingness of business travelers to attend meetings, conferences, and conventions later in the second quarter. From an expectations perspective, if we assume continued progress against the virus, we believe the second quarter should be better than the first quarter. We should be able to achieve not only positive hotel EBITDA, but we should be able to generate positive corporate adjusted EBITDA for the quarter. And with further progress in the second half of the year, we're hopeful that we can eliminate our operating cash burn and generate positive adjusted FFO sometime in the third quarter. One important item about the first quarter I want to point out. Previously, we had indicated that we believed we needed to get to 30% to 35% occupancy in order to get to break even for the portfolio. In March, we achieved a positive $1.4 million of hotel EBITDA at an occupancy level of just 24.7%, obviously much lower than our prior estimates. So think about that, profitability at an overall occupancy level less than 25%. Pretty remarkable, I think. This very positive result was primarily due to a pretty healthy portfolio-wide average rate of $245, as well as our new operating models throughout our portfolio. While this average rate in March benefited from prime season rates in South Florida, that will come down as we move out of high season. Our average rate will be helped by increases in rates at our other resorts on the West Coast as they move into prime season in Q2 and Q3, and as we benefit from the redevelopments that recently took place at Mission Bay Resort, Chaminade, Skamania, Lobert's Del Mar, La Playa, Marker Harborfront Resort, and Paradise Point. That's all of our resorts except southernmost resort, which will undergo a major renovation this summer. In addition, most of our urban markets will be moving into stronger leisure months as we move into the middle of the calendar and into and through the summer, hopefully just in time for business travel to accelerate in the fall. So we're very optimistic that our overall operating model is much improved and should allow for enhanced results as revenues continue to recover. When we think about 2022, we're focused strategically on the year being a very strong recovery year overall. Groups should be as strong as we believe there's a great deal of pent-up demand, and it will also benefit from all the meetings being rebooked from 2020 and 2021. We also think leisure will continue to be robust with a lot of pent-up demand for vacations and getaways and outbound international probably still more limited. This means we don't expect significant rate discounting in 2022. Again, this is with the obvious caveat that we get to relatively normal behavior by the end of this year and it remains relatively normal next year. We believe we're in a great position to take advantage of this recovery in 2022 and beyond, based on the outstanding condition of our hotels and resorts. As we've reported, we're moving forward with the redevelopment of Southernmost Resort in Key West this summer, Vitale into a one hotel in San Francisco in the fall, Grafton into an unofficial Z Collection hotel in West Hollywood, also in the fall, and we're completing Lobert's Del Mar next month. As it relates to the few remaining redevelopment projects we deferred due to the pandemic, we're continuing to complete plans and permitting, and we'll pull the trigger on these projects when we have more clarity on the recovery and progress against the virus. Specifically, as it relates to the $37 million redevelopment and transformation of Paradise Point in San Diego's Mission Bay into a Margaritaville Island resort, we're still working our way through discussions with governmental authorities. At this point, we don't expect to be able to start construction until at least late this year, assuming we get the necessary approvals in the next six months. All of these completed redevelopments and transformation, including the large number in the past few years, and all of the upcoming projects and improvements will provide significant upside for our portfolio over the next few years as the recovery takes hold and rolls forward. Importantly, the vast majority of the dollars for these projects have already been invested. As we look at the silver lining of potential upside from this crisis, we expect there will be significant opportunities over the next few years to acquire properties in distress due to a large number of cash-strapped and over-levered owners and many properties that will go back to lenders. In this regard, we're actively looking for opportunities to reinvest the dollars from the hotels we've sold over the last 12 months. We believe we have significant competitive advantages as opportunities arise over the next few years. These include our ability to operate properties more efficiently than the vast majority of buyers, the additional cost benefits from the additional economies of scale that can be generated from Curator, our unique strength in redevelopments and transformations, as well as with independent or small brand lifestyle hotels. our vast number of operator relationships, and our high profile and positive reputation in the industry. We're confident that our industry and our portfolio are currently on a path to recovery that is becoming increasingly clear. And we believe we've got the team, the portfolio, the knowledge, and the experience to perform exceedingly well in this recovery. And we appreciate your patience, your support, and your confidence in us. And with that, we'd now like to move on to questions. Donna, you may proceed with the Q&A.
spk01: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the floor is now open for questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad at this time. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Once again, that's star one to register a question at this time. Our first question is coming from Neil Malkin of Capital One Securities. Please go ahead.
spk14: Hey, everyone. Good morning. Good morning. Hey, first question. You know, a lot of people have been talking about, you know, are there going to be people who want to come back for groups, you know, how that's going to look, rebookings, et cetera. But there's two sides of that coin because the cities, municipalities also have to give the go-ahead. And, you know, I'm just curious, you know, markets like San Francisco, New York, L.A., et cetera, you know, are you confident that, you know, let's say California reopens June 15th, that, you know, you'll have the okay from the cities to, you know, basically go and have full-scale normal capacity group events if they are, in fact, on the books, let's say, in the fourth quarter of this year? Or do you think it'll take some time for sort of headcount or density restrictions to kind of lift, therefore, you know, providing a temporary capacity constraint?
spk10: Yeah, boy, you're asking me to predict government, and I'm not terribly good at that. I would tell you, based upon the guidelines that have come out already in California and other markets, that there are many markets where we do believe that hotels will be able to have good-sized meetings with appropriate safety and cleaning precautions. But in terms of the big city-wide, and if those are handled in the same way as they were pre-pandemic, I'm not sure I'd have a lot of confidence in that, Neil, before the end of the year. But it's really going to depend upon where the cases are, where hospitalizations and deaths are. And so, you know, if we can look like Australia where they haven't had a death since October of next year and they have single digit cases a year or zero because people get vaccinated and we've protected those who are at greatest risk, then yeah, I see no reason why all of the governments wouldn't move forward with allowing normal behavior, normal meetings, normal commerce in their markets. And I don't think at this point, perhaps California might be behind Florida or Texas or some of the other southern states in their progress, but I don't believe they're behind any of the East Coast cities as an example who, again, I think are being more cautious about, you know, allowing normal commerce in their markets.
spk14: Okay. Yeah, appreciate that. Other one for me is it seems like, you know, since last quarter there's been a huge you know, shift or pull forward in when you get to not even hotel, but, you know, corporate, you know, cash flow positive. And then you made the comment about, you know, being profitable at lower occupancies. But I'm just wondering, you know, can you maybe expand upon that a little bit in terms of, you know, how that you see that playing out, you know, particularly in like the third quarter, for example. I mean, you're going to have essentially all of your urban hotels open at that point with lower occupancies and lower ADR, which will weigh on, you know, overall, I guess, you know, performance. You're going to have, you're going to be off-season on the resorts, so, and you're going to have more demand, like more occupancy, you know, as the recovery picks up. So wouldn't that require more fixed full-time employees and therefore making it kind of like that stepwise function where you, you know, you kind of hit that next level of demand and there are certain requirements from the staffing side that would weigh on margins or profitability at that next level of occupancy? Can you just maybe go through, especially if corporate isn't really back that strong, how you plan on or what gives you the confidence to get to that sort of profitability?
spk10: Well, first of all, we haven't said we're confident we're going to get there. We've said it's possible that we could get there in the third quarter. It does depend upon the progress on the health side and the return of some travel, particularly business travel when you get to the last four months of the year. But while we're going out of prime season, as I said in my remarks, Neil, in Florida, we are going into prime season in Q2 and Q3 with the other five resorts on the West Coast. And so those will see their rates increase. There's a larger number, and as a result of that, we should be able to maintain the kind of average rate that we've been delivering, even as we reopen these urban hotels. So when it comes to margins, when we look at where we're at, In order to get to that corporate break-even level, we need about $12.5 million, $11.5 million more monthly profit than we made in March. And in order to do that, we think we need about twice the level of revenues, which will come from both rooms and from other revenues. And keep in mind, as occupancies do ramp up, we are achieving greater profitability in our food facilities. We'll have more banquets and catering, which is more profitable than our outlet profitability. And so when we look at the overall profitability, again, we think with about a 50% flow through from the additional revenues, we'll get to corporate profitability. And so that means in all likelihood, getting the overall portfolio to the low 40s in occupancy and with much stronger leisure through the year and business picking up gradually over the next four months and then hopefully a quicker pace over the back four months. Yeah, we think it's reasonable to think that we can get there sometime in the third quarter. Okay, I appreciate the thoughts. Thank you. Yep, thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Smeece Rose of Citi. Please go ahead.
spk06: Hi, thanks. I was just wondering on the group bookings that you said you're starting to see some improvement on and some, albeit modest, gains in business transient. Are you hearing at all, besides the healthcare concerns, any sort of pushback from businesses of looking to not spend as much going forward and sort of take advantage of the fact that no one has been traveling, yet productivity has been apparently fairly robust over the last year or so? Just kind of curious if you're hearing anything on that front.
spk10: Yeah, we are. We're actually seeing the opposite. So we're seeing greater spend. Keep in mind, what we have right now are more limited numbers, but in terms of what folks are looking at for their activities, they're spending more on property, which is beneficial, so they're going off property less. They're providing more for their attendees. and their overalls expect to spend more. So we're not seeing any hesitation on the part of groups to spend. And that translates into the rates. There really isn't pushback on rates at all at this point on the group side. So you mentioned a couple of things about productivity, and frankly, I don't know that those are lasting But nevertheless, businesses are very profitable. They tend to be more stringent about what they spend when they're not so profitable and their business isn't good. And they tend to be pretty generous with their people. I mean, think about this for a second. And I know with the people who work in our company, people who work at our hotels, they need vacations. They need to relax. They need to be pampered. And That's what we're seeing and hearing from businesses. We had a big incentive group down in Florida earlier this month. They spent $30,000 on F&B over the course of three days. It was not a large group. They were spending over $1,000 a day per person on their people. Look, that's anecdotal, but it's an indication that businesses want to reward their people when they're getting out and meeting and traveling, and that seems to be translating into the kinds of activities they're booking around their actual meetings.
spk06: Okay, that's really helpful. And then I just wanted to ask you kind of more specifically on the conversion of the hotel, the Tali. Just looking at the EBITDA results for that property, you know, it looks like it peaked back in 15 and kind of just continued to trail down through 19. Is it your thought that with the $25 million investment, you can get back to the kind of that 2015 level of 11 million? Or would you expect to surpass that, you know, assuming kind of a normalization of business trends?
spk10: Yeah, I mean, looking at historical numbers, there's a lot of variables in those SMEs, particularly at Vitale, which was impacted by a few things in the market, right? You had the convention center go under the knife for the expansion and the renovation. That impacted the market overall, so Vitale was not alone. in peaking near and around 15 or 16. We also had the sale of destination hotels in Joie de Vivre to Hyatt, and then the changeover of operators as a result of that, which impacted the property. And then finally, you had sort of the natural part, which we do think we will make up in more, which is the property had not been renovated since it was built. So I think you're talking about 12 or 13 years. Now it's 14 or 15. And so we do think we'll get a double-digit cash yield on the investment that we're making in terms of improvement in performance. But that'll be dependent upon where the market goes over the next few years. And so we do think through higher rates, primarily, and a little bit of occupancy and events that will make significantly more profits and get an attractive return on those dollars.
spk08: And to me, also to add to that on Vitality, as you recall, when we acquired LaSalle, all the properties, the California properties had a step up in property taxes, so that impacted Vitality. as well as any of the legacy LaSalle hotels in California. So that explains also some of the 2019 performance relative to 2018.
spk06: Got you. Okay. Thank you. Appreciate it.
spk08: Thanks.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Rich Hightower of Evercore. Please go ahead.
spk12: Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks, as always, for the great detail. So a couple of questions. First one, just a quick housekeeping one, I think, for Ray. Can you remind us, I think there's a $500 million unrestricted investment bucket in your current waiver package. Does the conversion of the converts change that at all, or is there anything to look out for as that may happen in the future?
spk08: Nope. The conversion of the converts has no impact other than that in a way have $500 million less debt we have to worry about refinancing. But we have three investment baskets. One is $500 million of new investments that we can complete with any sort of equity raises. We have up to $500 million also from the reinvestments from any hotels that we've sold, and we've sold about $225 million, as we talked about. And then we have another basket of $100 million of other investments, which can entail a bunch of other things, whether that's looking at joint ventures, other sort of structures, and other special investments. So Plenty of flexibility right now, and the good thing is in this environment right now, our bank's been very supportive, so that's not a constraint. And with the improving trends, as we noted on our call, we will be more active on looking at some opportunities.
spk10: Hey, and Rich, if you have one more question, go ahead. We have a pretty long queue, so I think we're going to ask people just to pick their best question and then fire away so we can get through everybody.
spk12: Yeah, sure. Feel free to take it offline. Thanks, guys.
spk10: Thanks.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Ari Klein of BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk04: Thanks. Good morning. What are you seeing from a staffing standpoint at resorts where occupancy is a lot closer pre-pandemic levels? And has there been any pushback from customers maybe being impacted in some way from lower levels of staffing? And then just separately on the Villa Florence, I think it's the only hotel in San Fran that's still not open. If you can just update us there.
spk10: So as it relates to staffing at the resorts with higher occupancies, I mean, getting labor back is a challenge. There's a few primary reasons, and frankly, we're seeing it everywhere. It's not just where we have higher occupancies. In fact, it might even be a little bit less in those properties than it is at the properties with lower, the markets with lower occupancies. But there's really a few things inhibiting folks from coming back right now, which is why we think much of it's transitory. One is the enhanced unemployment insurance benefits. and the free COBRA that have come through in the various legislation passed by Congress. Second, when you compound that with kids in many places not in school five days a week and one of the parents needing to stay home to take care of those kids and help those kids learn, there are also folks who, so that's child care related, Some have generational issues with parents they need to take care of in this period of time. And so when we look at those issues, we think those mitigate dramatically when we get into the fall and the unemployment insurance runs out. Clearly there have been people who have left the industry and gone into other industries, but there's still What we hear from the employees we call, and we're, you know, we have the list, we go through the list, is, you know, those issues and the last one, which is some who haven't been vaccinated yet, you know, still fear coming back to work and interacting with their colleagues and guests in some cases who don't behave properly. So we think those mitigate and In the meantime, the industry is actively sourcing people from other areas, going back to colleges as an example, where many graduates are having trouble finding jobs in the hospitality or retail or other industries, as well as younger students in college who have had a hard time getting internships, who can come work for the summer and learn about the hotel industry. So there's a whole host of things our properties are doing differently to source folks because it's not necessarily, we're not getting the staff we need just from the people who've been previously employed. As it relates to Villa Florence, it's really the same boat as Vitali. Vitale's going to remain closed through the year because of the benefits of renovating while we're closed and then reopening as a one at the end of the year or at the very beginning of next year before the J.P. Morgan Conference. And we have a redevelopment plan for Villa Florence that is not only completed, we actually purchased the FF&E sitting in a warehouse in the Bay Area. And we're just waiting till we feel comfortable that the investment makes sense. And so in the meantime, we're keeping it closed because we may go through the same thing there. And we don't need to pull the trigger on the renovation yet because we already have the FF&E, which is usually your long lead item. That's why we needed to make a decision to move forward with Vitali because you got a 16 to 20 week lead on FF&E today. Thanks, appreciate the caller.
spk09: Thanks, Ari.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Michael Bellisario of Baird. Please go ahead.
spk02: Good morning, guys.
spk13: Morning.
spk02: Morning, Mike. Sort of kind of back to that labor topic that you touched on a little bit, sort of combo labor market outlook question, but just on your view of the 100 to 200 basis points that you've talked about previously, the longer-term margin upside, How do you see that playing out in your better performing markets like Naples, for example, versus some of your more impacted urban markets? Basically, where do you see more upside? Where do you see upside? And then how does labor affect your outlook and play into that analysis today?
spk10: Yeah, I mean, it's hard to make that differentiation, you know, between the two different properties because I think the same The same benefits accrue in both places. Obviously, bigger properties will get more benefit, but the properties are being run more efficiently, and we've found different ways to do business, and we're using more technology, and we're providing the services in a way that the customer wants, and we have a lot more cross-trained people, which is good for them and their careers in terms of career development. So I don't know, Mike, that it really varies by urban versus resort when it comes down to it. I do think, and I think already asked this question, I mean, if you've eaten in a restaurant recently, you may be a little bit unhappy with the speed of service. And that's because everybody's struggling with having enough labor to deal with the periods of time when you get to max or near max occupancy, whether it's cooks in the kitchen or it's servers or bussers or just somebody to answer the phone if you don't have the technology to do it. It's going to be at a different level, I think, for the next four or five months in the country in a lot of different businesses. So I think we feel good about what we've said previously. We don't see this temporary labor issue as any kind of long-term issue. And we hope that all those folks who are sitting at home are going to come back to work sooner rather than later.
spk02: Got it. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Sean Kelly of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hi, everybody. Good morning. Ray, John, just maybe a fairly straightforward one, but I believe there was a $200 million ATM program that was filed. Could you just comment on that? And, yeah, any thoughts on potential opportunities or what that could be used for?
spk08: Sure. Well, this is similar. We had an ATM program that we let expire several years ago. And so we just renewed it. It's $200 million. Our last one is $175 million. This just provides us with another tool for capital in the event there is an opportunity. You should not expect that because we have an ATM in place that we're going to use it. There were many quarters. In fact, there were years when we had an ATM previously and we had zero usage on it. So it's just another tool in there. We have, as you know, sufficient liquidity right now. We have cash from the recent sales. So in terms of uses of cash for any investment opportunities, we would likely use that first given where we are.
spk10: And so I wouldn't read anything into it other than it's administratively a good thing to have in place.
spk03: Okay. And so, I mean, usage for like direct the leveraging is, is less likely. I think you guys have been pretty cautious about using, you know, I think straight equity, but obviously the stock has run. So I just want to make kind of make sure that that's still largely the plan.
spk10: it's not only less likely it's not going to happen. I think that's pretty clear. I mean, we don't have a deleveraging issue. So we don't have too much leverage. We need EBITDA to recover. So we see no reason to lower the leverage level in a recovery from low levels already.
spk08: And also the timing of that now is we We did it in concert with filing of our queue just because we save legal fees and audit consent fees and all those things doing it now versus doing it a month from now or two months from now or so. So that was the reason for the timing.
spk03: Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Yep. Thanks.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Bill Crow of Raymond James. Please go ahead.
spk09: Hey. Good morning, guys. I really want to focus on the recovery of group travel, which isn't here yet. But I'm curious when it does come back. It will probably be different for a while, especially in markets that were closed or more closed than others. And is that a disadvantage to smaller independent hotels as these meetings may fill up the host hotels first and maybe not have the same spillover or citywide effect? that they used to have. What do you think about that?
spk10: I think a lot of people would prefer not to stay in a host hotel for so many reasons. They tend to be large, impersonal, crowded, often inconvenient, long elevator waits, et cetera. So I don't know that particularly as we move forward, Bill, and it'd be interesting to see how people react from a behavioral perspective to what they've now gotten used to, which is limited number of people in the elevator, limited number of people in a room, in a space. I mean, that's a behavioral issue, and I'm not an expert in that area, but I think it's going to be something that gradually changes. It won't happen all at once. I actually don't have any concerns about that particular issue.
spk08: Bill, to be clear, when we say host hotel, we're meaning the convention center host hotel, not our neighbors upstairs. That's correct.
spk09: That is correct. John, if you could clarify for me, it sounded like you're still very, very optimistic about the acquisition opportunities and distressed opportunities. And that hasn't changed based on some of the prints that we've seen, which certainly seem fully priced.
spk10: No, because all you're seeing right now are the really good properties. At least those are the ones that get the newspaper headlines. There's properties trading at pretty crappy numbers that nobody wants to write about other than the occasional New York story that says somebody bought this for $100 million three years ago, and somebody new just bought it for $2 million. So we're a long way from seeing volume, and there's a lot of extensions going on right now. Forbearance, again, which is not abatement. And so loan levels are piling up. And liquidity is lacking. And I think as there was in the last cycle, you know, we really bought from the middle of 2010 after we had already come out of the recession through the early part of 2015. So I think this will be a multi-year opportunity. You know, to buy resort properties, I don't think the opportunity is about buying at a discount. If you're going to buy a resort property, I think it's about buying a good property. I think for us, Bill, again, it continues to be where and what we want to buy is going to be opportunistic. And what we look for are properties that we can make a difference in. from an operations perspective. We're not into spread investing or purely cyclical investing. We want to buy assets and invest in assets that we can get a better return because we can bring in expertise to those assets through redevelopment, transformation, brand change, operator change, best practices, efficiencies, those kinds of things. Not troubled at all by, you know, some of the headlines of assets that are trading. In most cases, they're not assets, you know, we have an interest in anyway. Yep.
spk09: Okay. Thanks, John. Thanks, Ray. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Jim Sullivan of BTIG. Please go ahead.
spk11: Yeah, thanks. John, just kind of following on a little bit from your answer to Bill's question, I'm curious how you think about the supply variable today versus where it was pre-COVID. And what I'm thinking of is, you know, pre-COVID, the industry appeared to be facing a situation of somewhat weakening demand growth in percentage terms and growth in supply in terms of hotels in construction and otherwise that was going to be running ahead of that demand growth. And we hear a lot of talk about hotels that are closed that won't reopen, number one. And then number two, there is this percentage of assets, and we can describe them as kind of the walking wounded, where they're not cash flowing. They're piling up deferred capex. They're not being maintained. therefore arguably they're not going to be competitive with a with a well-maintained portfolio so i just wonder as you think about the supply demand variable postcode how are you feeling about that and do you have a handle on how many hotels that are closed will not reopen and you know maybe what percentage of the prior inventory is really not going to be competitive for a while yeah um well i can i can speak
spk10: to your question, and I think it's a really good question as it relates to how maybe we take these things for granted that in the typical recovery, the first three, four, five years, we see very little new construction delivered. And that gives the industry, historically, the long runway to recover. from a downturn, as we're clearly cyclical. And in this cycle, in many ways, it's no different than others, and in some ways it's very different, because this was event-driven where you have an economy that actually, outside of a few affected industries, is really humming. And you've obviously had trillions of dollars pumped into into the economy from both the monetary side and the fiscal side. And so when you think about the next three to five years, we think about a period with little to no new supply, whereas anything that was under construction gets delivered, but you're seeing other properties, as you've said, become obsolete and leave the market. particularly in the urban markets. But you even see it in suburban markets that, you know, the lower end and older suite product that can be converted to residential as an example. So I think we feel very good about it and about how things are going to go that we're not going to have supply as a headwind. In fact, we might have supply as a tailwind in terms of flat to potentially negative supply. We have very little construction financing available over the next, certainly not very little today and likely for the next few years. It doesn't mean there'll be no starts, but there'll be very few. And we have huge increases right now from when we talk to developers, and I'm sure you hear this in other industries, but huge increases in costs of construction in development. whether it's steel and concrete or it's lumber, sheet board, labor, it's all working to make new development much more expensive, which will, again, provide a longer runway for the recovery of operations and values in the industry. And we do think this recovery will be quicker. because of the strength of the economy and, as I indicated, the amount of dollar. I mean, you look at the consumer today, they're at a position where you typically are at the end of a cycle, not the beginning of a cycle, with money in the bank and pent-up demand. So I think it shapes up pretty well, Bill, but clearly we've got to get past the health side of the pandemic and get back to a level of normalcy.
spk11: Great. Thanks, John.
spk10: Thanks, Jim.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Gregory Miller of Truist. Please go ahead.
spk05: Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I want to follow up also on the group front. How concerned are you that vaccination interest in the U.S. appears to be slowing in some parts of the country and that there may be a meaningful percentage of the population that intends to travel for work and remain unvaccinated? And I particularly think of the implications to convention demands and whatever health safety measures may still need to be taken next year to ensure events can transpire with normalized attendance and for most attendees to feel comfortable enough to show up in person before the true end of the pandemic.
spk10: Yeah, I mean, I think it's going to depend upon It's not just whether folks are vaccinated, but it's whether the virus is spreading in the community, right? So we know some people aren't going to be vaccinated for various reasons. And so we need to get to a level where it's not going from person to person in the community. And I think until we get there, You're going to continue to have, you know, our CIO just came back from a 70, oh, he said maybe 55-person meeting down in Florida. And it was an AHLA meeting of the hotel investment roundtable. And he said, you know, you had to take a test before, show that you didn't have the virus. You had to show your vaccination card. And so if you're two weeks past the supposed full effectiveness, then you didn't need to take a test. And then they also provided testing on site in case someone wasn't able to get their test before they got there. So I think you're still going to have protocols while the virus is spreading in the community. And clearly, that is more likely to spread less if more people get vaccinated. And so we're just going to have to see how it plays out. And hopefully we do get to the level of spread that's very minimal and people feel comfortable. And it doesn't matter whether you're vaccinated or you're not because it's not spreading.
spk05: Thanks, John.
spk11: Thanks, Greg.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Anthony Powell of Barclays. Please go ahead.
spk00: Hi, good morning. Kind of on the same topic, you know, there's a lot of talk about things improving after Labor Day into the third and fourth quarter, but some experts, including I think Dr. Scott Gottlieb, have said that they expect a seasonal kind of increase or resurgence of COVID in the late kind of fall to winter time frame, let's say Thanksgiving to February, just due to unvaccinated people, natural seasonality of respiratory illnesses and whatnot. Does that concern you? Have you heard that being brought up in any of your group conversations? Could that put things like the J.P. Morgan Conference at risk in January? Just thoughts about that seasonality risk that could still be around this year and even next year, to be honest.
spk10: Yeah. So, you know, interestingly, none of us have gone through a pandemic, including the pandemic experts. And so we continue to be concerned about the virus. That's why we're cautious about you know, an inability to make forecasts and provide confidence and guarantees. So we have to see how it plays out. You know, we've seen predictions that have come true. You know, there's going to be another wave following the holidays in November and December, and that happened. We've heard that the last winter would be disastrous because we were going to have the flu season on top of the pandemic, the virus, and we didn't have a flu season because, of course, everybody wasn't meeting with other people and it was hard to transmit. So, I mean, the answer to your question is I'm not an expert on this. I think there continues to be concern on the part of businesses and individuals about resurgence and We just have to see how it goes. Right now, we're seeing increases in leads and bookings, and I think that's evidence of people being increasingly confident. But we're not at normal pre-pandemic levels, which, again, suggests that some people aren't there yet. And I think that's why this is going to take some time and why the only way to get back to a level of normalcy is to really crush this thing And it really does mean people participating in society by getting vaccinated because what's clear is vaccinations work. And while they're probably going to need to be boosters and maybe an annual one and ones for variants and all those things, it seems like the science is pretty confident in its ability to deliver very quickly vaccines that work against this virus. It really comes down to humans who have to make these decisions for the benefit of society. And I don't mean to be preaching, but it's very selfish not to take a vaccine because it's for the benefit of society. And it's not just about you not getting sick. It's about you not getting sick and passing it along to somebody else. So I always urge people to go get a vaccine because because I don't think we're going to crush this thing unless most people do.
spk00: Agreed on that, but given the seasonality risk, shouldn't you be trying to pull demand forward as much as you can, let's say into the summer, if possible, as opposed to waiting for the fourth quarter, given just seasonality?
spk10: Anthony, we're not waiting for anything. We're trying to get the most amount of demand we can get as soon as we can get it, but you need the customers. It's not like we suggest to a business customer that they have their meeting in October. You should have it in July, August, and they say, no, we want to have it in October. That's all we can do. Just to be clear, we're trying to fill as soon as we can and encourage people to travel, but Folks are still going to make their own decisions.
spk00: All right, thank you.
spk10: Thanks.
spk09: Donna?
spk01: Yes, our next question is from Lucas Hartwick of Green Street. Please go ahead.
spk15: Thanks. So the ESG movement is starting to focus on the emissions related to business travel. I'm just curious if that's coming up in conversations with corporates and maybe just how you're thinking about that, looking out a few years. I know COVID is kind of the focus of the moment, but is that something you're worried about maybe three, five years down the road?
spk10: Yeah, that's a good question, Lucas. It's an issue that we're going to need to understand We've actually asked clients that question, and some of the larger folks in particular are increasingly focused on thinking about how that might affect their businesses and how they run their businesses and how they meet and how they travel. I think I'd be a little bit more concerned if I was an airline than a hotel, because One of the things we hear from folks is it may mean that we don't allow day trips on an airplane because the biggest producer in travel is not the hotel, it's getting to the hotel, it's the airline in particular. And so it may lead to longer stays, longer trips, but I think it's really too early to understand the dynamics of it But it's a real issue. We were talking to an account, and I haven't seen this announced, but I think we are going to see it shortly, is the airlines working with a number of the major corporate travel accounts where the corporations are committing to pay basically over current fares in order to subsidize alternative fuels for certain airline routes. So There's a lot of things that we're going to see. They inquire about our sustainability practices in RFPs, and I think that's becoming increasingly common and increasingly important. And, of course, we take our commitment to ESG very seriously, and we're moving to much more sustainable practices and you know, more interaction with all of our stakeholders, including the communities that we do business with. But I think, you know, your question related to, you know, are people going to travel less because of ESG, I don't know the answer to that, and I don't think the clients know either.
spk15: That's really helpful. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question is coming from Flores Van Dykem of Compass Point. Please go ahead.
spk13: Thanks for taking my question. I know it's a long line here, and hopefully we're close to the end. Can you maybe comment on Curator? We've talked about a lot of the other key issues here, but maybe touch on what you're seeing with – I know you signed up SAGE recently. Any updates you can provide on how that's moving? how the signing up of new partners is going and if you're feeling good about where that stands.
spk10: Yeah, so we are feeling good about the speed at which it is growing. The progress we're making in terms of building out the benefits, which are through attractive master service agreements with our product and service partners in the industry. And as we build those out, we're seeing increasing commitments on the part of folks who are in the independent side of the business. I think the one thing we've learned, Floris, based upon the number of leads we have of people who've contacted us and the number of properties they have is that the addressable market is actually probably more than double the size we thought it was. So I think we were thinking the market was, you know, 500 hotels or so. We think today we think it's probably 1,000 hotels or more just in the U.S. So I think we feel really good about where we're going. And we did provide an update in the press release on the number of members who've signed up. The hotels that have signed up now and the number of master service agreements we've completed and the number that are in process. So we feel good about the progress so far.
spk13: Thanks, John. Just you mentioned domestic. Is there a potential that you could take this abroad as well down the road? Presumably that would increase the market size significantly, but
spk10: Yeah, I think that's possible. We're not an expert on how things are purchased abroad, and so if it's anything like the U.S., the larger you are, the better pricing you get. We certainly know that with some of the service providers that that's the case around the world, but we don't know about some of the other products and services. It's not something we've investigated yet. We've got our hands full within the U.S. The one area I would say we're beginning to look into as an expansion of it is with restaurants, independent restaurants outside of hotels who suffer from the same sort of anti-competitive situation as independent hotels do. That's something we're beginning to look at and talk to some folks about, and that may be an opportunity to expand where Curator is focused. Thanks, John. Thanks, Floris.
spk01: Thank you. At this time, I'd like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Borst for closing comments.
spk10: Hey, thanks, Donna. Thanks, everybody, for taking the time. Long call. We wanted to get to everybody's questions. So we appreciate that and hope and wish everybody to stay safe and healthy and go travel if you've been vaccinated. It's a lot of fun. Go to a meeting. I think you'll find it's not a scary experience. So thanks for taking the time. We look forward to updating you 90 days.
spk01: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your interest in Pebble Brook. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.
Disclaimer