This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Thank you for standing by. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Provident Financial Services, Inc. Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press star one Thank you. Adriano Duarte, Investor Relations Officer, you may begin your conference.
spk00: Thank you, Cheryl. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter earnings call. Today's presenters are President and CEO Tony Labazzetta and Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Tom Lyons. Before beginning the review of our financial results, we ask that you please take note of our standard questions to any forward looking statements that may be made during the course of today's call. Our full disclaimer is contained in last evening's earnings release, which has been posted to the investor relations page on our website, providence.bank. Now, it's my pleasure to introduce Tony Labazzetta, who will offer his perspective on our second quarter. Tony?
spk03: Thank you, Adriano. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Providence Financial Services earnings call. The disruption to the banking system and resultant volatility that we all experienced in the first quarter has abated, and Providence Bank fared well through the instability. These events, however, combined with more rate hikes by the Federal Reserve gave rise to new headwinds for the banking industry in the form of funding challenges as we headed into the second quarter. These funding challenges included more demands by customers for higher rates, needs for more insurance, a disintermediation from low-cost deposits to higher-yielding time deposits, and certain deposits shifting to Treasury securities. Consequently, we experienced higher deposit betas for the quarter, which increased our funding costs and compressed our net interest margin. Despite these unfavorable market conditions, Provident produced good financial results this quarter, which once again demonstrates the strength of our franchise and talented management team. As a result, we've reported earnings of 43 cents per share, an annualized return on average assets of 0.93%, and a return on average tangible equity of 10.75%. Excluding merger-related charges and normalizing the CECL provision for stabilized economic forecasts, we estimate our core return on average assets was approximately 1.07% for the second quarter. Our capital is strong and comfortably exceeds well-capitalized levels. Tangible book value per share expanded 3.6% during the first six months to $15.66 on the strength of our earnings. Our tangible common equity ratio on June 30th was 8.72%. As such, our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of 24 cents per share, payable on August 25th. Presently, Our uninsured and uncollateralized deposits are 2.7 billion or approximately 26% of our total deposits. Our unbalanced sheet liquidity plus borrowing capacity is 3.8 billion or 140% of uninsured deposits. Our core deposits are a valuable component of our franchise. During the quarter, our core deposits decreased 55 million or 0.7%. which we attribute to normal business activity and customers seeking higher yields on their deposits. For the second quarter, our deposit beta was 148% with the rising rate cycle to date deposit beta was about 25%. Consequently, our total cost of deposits increased and in large part drove our total cost of funds of 50 basis points to 1.71%. and compressed our net interest margin 37 basis points. Our commercial lending team closed approximately $516 million of new commercial loans during the second quarter. Pre-payments decreased 56% to $125 million as compared to the trailing quarter. Our credit metrics remain strong in the second quarter, and we continue to maintain prudent underwriting standards, particularly in Cree lending. As part of our normal CRE monitoring processes, we have performed targeted, in-depth analysis to evaluate portfolio and loan level risks. Our line of credit utilization percentage increased 4% in the second quarter to 35%, which is approaching our historical average of approximately 40%. As a result of the improved production, reduced prepayments, and increased line utilization, our commercial loans grew $315 million, or 3.6% for the quarter. For the six months, we grew $296 million, or 3.4%, which is pacing at an annualized growth rate of about 6.7%. The pull-through in our commercial loan pipeline during the second quarter was good, and the gross pipeline remained strong at approximately $1.7 billion. The pull-through adjusted pipeline, including loans pending closing, is approximately $1 billion. and our projected pipeline rate increased 47 basis points to 7.24%. We are encouraged by the strength and quality of our pipeline. In addition, payoffs have slowed. As a result, we expect to achieve our commercial loan lending growth targets for the remainder of 2023. Our fee-based businesses performed well this quarter. Provident Protection Plus had an outstanding second quarter. 82% organic growth, which resulted in a 34% increase in revenue and an 87% increase in operating profit as compared to the same quarter last year. The conditions in the financial markets were more stable in the second quarter, and as a result, Beacon Trust experienced growth in market value of assets under management and related fee income. Beacon's fee income remained stable compared to the trailing quarter, as the increase in advisory fees was mostly offset by a reduction in trust revenue. With respect to our previously announced merger with Lakeland Bancorp, we continue our engagement with the regulators and have provided additional information in order to further support our application for approval of the merger. The companies have made significant progress in various integration initiatives through outstanding teamwork from both banks. We look forward to receiving regulatory approval and combining our two great franchises into the best bank in New Jersey. As we look forward, we remain focused on growing our business. However, staying disciplined and committed to our risk management principles is critical during these challenging times. In addition, we expect to close and integrate the merger with Lakeland Bank in the near future, which we believe will create value for all of our stakeholders. Now, I'll turn the call over to Tom for his comments on our financial performance. Tom?
spk02: thank you tony and good morning everyone as tony noted our net income for the quarter was 32 million dollars or 43 cents per share compared with 40.5 million or 54 cents per share for the trailing quarter and 39.2 million or 53 cents per share for the second quarter of 2022. non-tax deductible charges related to our pending merger with lakeland bank corp totaled 2 million dollars in the current quarter and 1.1 million in the trailing quarter excluding these merger related charges Pre-tax pre-provision earnings for the current quarter were $55.3 million, or an annualized 1.6% of average assets. Revenue totaled $118 million for the quarter, compared with $130 million for the trailing quarter and $120 million for the second quarter of 2022. Our net interest margin decreased 37 basis points from the trailing quarter to 3.11%. The yield on earning assets improved by 10 basis points versus the trailing quarter as floating and adjustable rate loans repriced favorably, and new loan originations reflected higher market rates. This improvement in asset yields, however, was more than offset by an increase in interest-bearing funding costs. Increased funding costs reflected current market conditions, which resulted in an increase in borrowings accompanied by a decrease in deposits. Certain non-interest-bearing balances also moved to our interest-bearing insured cash sweep product, in order to obtain increased deposit insurance. In addition, lower costing demand and savings balance has shifted to higher costing time deposits. The average total cost of deposits increased 37 basis points to 1.42%. This brought our rising rate cycle to date data to 25%. The average cost of total interest bearing liabilities increased 59 basis points in the trailing quarter to 2.13%. prolonged inverted yield curve ongoing deposit competition and an increase in the attractiveness of investment alternatives continue to impact funding costs as a result we expect to see some continued net interest margin compression to the balance of 2023 and project the margin will stabilize at around three percent period end total loans grew 306 million dollars with commercial loans increasing 315 million for the quarter our pull through adjusted loan pipeline increased 109 million from last quarter to 1 billion dollars a weighted average rate of 7.24 versus our current portfolio yield of 5.24 the provision for credit losses on loans increased 4.4 million for the quarter to 10.4 million dollars primarily due to a worsened commercial property price index forecast as a result the allowance for credit losses on loans increased to 97 basis points of total loans at june 30th from 91 basis points at march 31st Current credit metrics, however, were stable, and annualized net charge-offs were just four basis points of loans for the quarter. Non-interest income decreased $2.8 million versus the trailing quarter, as a $2 million gain related to a prior quarter sale of REO was realized upon the satisfaction of post-closing conditions in the trailing quarter. In addition, deposit fees were down $612,000 versus the trailing quarter. and insurance agency income, while ahead of plan for the second quarter, was $255,000 less than the seasonally strong first quarter. Excluding provisions for credit losses on commitments to extend credit and merger-related charges, non-insurance expense decreased $4.5 million versus the trailing quarter, with $3.5 million of that decline coming in compensation and benefits expense, as incentive accruals, stock-based compensation, and employer payroll tax expense were all lower than the trailing quarter. Adjusted operating expenses were an annualized 1.83% of average assets for the current quarter compared with 2% in the trailing quarter and 1.92% for the second quarter of 2022. The efficiency ratio was 53.29% for the second quarter of 2023 compared with 51.85% in the trailing quarter and 53.83% for the second quarter of 2022. That concludes our prepared remarks. We would be happy to respond to questions.
spk01: To ask a question, please press star one. Your first question is from Mark Fitzgibbon of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
spk05: Hey, good morning, guys. Happy Friday. Good morning, Mark. Tony, I wondered if there's anything left that you all need to do or provide to the regulators, or have you sort of done all that? And do you have any rough sense what the timing might look like for a closing on the Lakeland deal?
spk03: Yes, I mean, I, you know, what I can say to that is that we have weekly meetings with calls with the FDIC to ensure that any questions that are open or anything that's pending has been provided. So we're, when I look at this, it's like we're on the back end of that, right? We've given them everything that they need to process the application. uh will a question or two arise during during their their what i would call that a final analysis sure but um you know from my perspective and i know i get guided by council not to not to be you know to to forward on this it just appears that everything is there and they have to go through their process and um so i'm expecting it to happen to happen relatively soon great
spk05: And then second question, Tom, on the expense trends, obviously they were great this quarter, and it sounded like expenses might take up a little bit in the third quarter. Did I hear that correctly?
spk02: I think we'll be able to maintain in the 64 to 65 million dollar range mark. I think like a lot of our peers, we're cognizant of the pressure that interest margins put on earnings, and we're looking carefully at all our expenses.
spk05: Okay. And I heard your comments also on the margin sort of bottoming out around 3%. Is that assumed in the third quarter? Yes, I think so, Mark. It comes in around three and stays there. Okay. And with the strong pipeline that you have and, you know, given sort of the softening economic situation, how are you thinking about provisioning levels for the back half of the year?
spk02: know i think about the total coverage at 97 basis points and i don't really see it going much higher than that um that was really responsive to the economic forecast in particular the commercial property price index um rely on moody's baseline for economic forecast and i think they were a little bit slower than some other uh forecasters maybe in catching up on on their view of cre potential losses um that said our own book is is quite strong as you saw um really strong in the asset quality metrics overall and and no concerns uh you know, reflected in the current book.
spk05: Great. Thank you.
spk01: Your next question is from Billy Young of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
spk04: Hey, good morning, guys. You can hear me okay? Perfectly. Great. Maybe kind of a two-part question here to start. First, you know, on loan growth, you know, it looks like you're set up to have, you know, continue nice growth into the third quarter with, with the stronger, uh, adjusted pull through pipelines. Um, kind of, you know, what are your thoughts? You know, I guess, yeah. What are the thoughts on growth in the back half of the year? And then secondly, um, you know, can you kind of give us an update on your thoughts on funding going forward from here? You know, uh, particularly given the, um, loan-to-deposit ratio at close to 103%?
spk03: Sure. I might give it a long-winded answer on the two-part question. So with regards to our lending, we think the pacing that I mentioned during the call at around 6.7% is something that is in the wheelhouse. We still guide to that 5% to 6% growth rate. Pipeline is strong. The activity is strong. Our underwriting is strong, so we feel pretty good about that sector. One other thing to point out that in the first half of the year, we've seen a substantive growth on the CNI side of the book as well, so there's not that, which is inconsistent with our plan, so not to rely so heavily on Cree lending. So just to give you a quick metric on that, we did about 40% of our production was in CNI versus 27% last year at the same time. The teams are doing a good job executing on that, and I'm feeling really good. In terms of funding, I guess our expectation, if I were to just throw it out there on a macro basis, is that our aim is to probably try to keep deposits stable for the rest of the year. There are, I don't think it's prudent to have strategies that, to attract, because it's very expensive to do that. That being said, we still grow a lot of our deposits through our business banking program. So we still expect some good activity there and growth. On the municipal side, I think that we hit new norms. A lot of the excess money that was in municipalities through stimulus has gone out. So therefore, we don't expect a lot of growth in that sector. And we're aiming to maintain consumer deposits on a level basis. And I think if we can do that, it's a good achievement. That being said, how do you funnel the growth? We're going to fund it through our business banking growth in terms of deposits. We're going to probably go to the wholesale market if needed, given that it's a better pricing play than trying to incrementally price your deposits through some campaign. And lastly, we'll use some securities cash flows that come in to divert those into the lending sector. I think that You know we're cognizant of loan to deposit ratios not going, you know, out of bounds, but our estimates show that they're still within the bands that we want to operate in. So we're comfortable pushing for that 5-6%, as long as it's good responsible growth, because it will also come with some self funding in that category.
spk02: I was just going to add, with some of our peers stepping back a bit in the lending arena, it affords us the ability to continue to be selective, both with regard to pricing and structure. So we're getting looks at some quality loans. Exactly.
spk03: Long-winded answer, Bill. Hopefully I gave you what you needed.
spk04: You did, and it wasn't long-winded at all. Thanks. And this, I guess, second question, to kind of follow up on Mark's questioning on the margin, you know, it sounds like, you know, Does it kind of feel like some of the, you know, deposit pressures that we saw in the second quarter are normalizing or getting better so far in the third quarter? It sounds like, you know, we're pretty close to the margin bottoming here. And, you know, with the Fed's hike earlier this week was the last one for this year. Do you guys feel better about, you know, your ability to kind of, you know, incrementally margin expansion as we get further out from this?
spk02: I do think that's the case, Bill. I think, you know, a lot of the industry and ourselves included have caught up to a degree on the lag that we had on deposits or we're much closer to or add in market rates. So I think that the funding pressure will abate some. I think we've been conservative in our NIM modeling in the assumptions around shift in composition within that portfolio, you know, to the higher costing CDs, which we've seen on the consumer side. and recognizing the ICS product, which has a rate to it, as being one of the areas where we've seen growth as well. And the beta that we've applied to the most current hike is pretty significant, too, to capture the rest of that lag, I think.
spk03: Yeah, and I would just add on that we're hearing that from the business lines as well. So if you kind of look back at the second quarter, the delta between where we were pricing and where the markets had moved just kind of widened to a place where customers became extremely aware. And obviously what happened in the first quarter around liquidity. So every time there was a Fed hike, the customers were almost ahead of the Fed hike looking for what's going to happen on their account. It hasn't happened this go around. So this Fed hike, there was silence. And so we're seeing a much, I'm not suggesting that there's not any of it happening, but was happening network wide and now it might be small pieces so uh the expectation is and i think it's consistent with some of what we're hearing from our our peers is that that that's slowed down so the customers close the gap between or the delta between market and and uh and where we were pricing so kind of feels like it's leveling off um secondly we're not seeing any unusual irrational behaviors from from our competition in the marketplace that would result in any dynamic of pricing and going into the third and fourth quarter. So that also gives me a little bit of solace to say, yes, we are kind of plateauing in that space. So I think Tom's projection on the margin, given that all of it is coming nearly from the funding side pressure, that's why we can make that statement. Secondly, there is another element here in terms of the Fed's hike that Tom and I talk about, and that is that, you know, our assets will continue to price up, and if the behavior on the deposits kind of subsided, we might add a little bit of benefit in that category to stabilize any further.
spk02: On the asset side, within the loan book, 52% of that is a variable rate with 24% within that being floating. We saw the on-rate move up to 6%. six and three eighths, I think it was roughly in the second quarter. So the portfolio rate at 724 and the, I'm sorry, the pipeline rate and the portfolio yield currently at 524. If you look at the average balance growth in loans versus the spot balance too, you can see the average balance is lagging. So some of that production we saw in Q2, we're gonna see greater benefit from in Q3. So all those things are helping to maintain that margin by so it's nice improvement in asset yield over the projection.
spk03: But I just, I think it's probably a good time for me to also express that as an organization, we're very cognizant on risk and we're not doing anything from a standpoint of trying to stretch in any areas to make up for this margin pressure. We're just going along doing our strong business. We like the nature and quality of the loans that we're putting on. And we feel good about a lot of things, except, you know, just that the funding cost is market driven. Other than that, we're staying resilient to our risk management processes.
spk04: Perfect. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Thank you.
spk01: Your next question is from Michael Pareto of KBW. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
spk07: Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Morning, Mike. Tom, were you able to... Maybe rehash or update us on kind of where, you know, obviously some time has passed, rates have changed. Do you have new kind of pro forma capital ratios for the bank, assuming, you know, Lakeland closes in the back half of the year at some point or a range or just some guideposts around how you're thinking about that?
spk02: Really trying to look where we stand versus total risk-based capital at the bank level. That's the weakest ratio among there, where we're in excess of well-capitalized levels on our pro forma projections. So they have improved over the course of the years. Both companies have managed their capital and had good earnings over the course of the first six months.
spk07: So, you know, relative to what you guys communicated when the deal was announced, it sounds like they'd be modestly higher just based on the capital build at both institutions? That's correct. Okay. And I wanted to also just ask on the non-interest income side, if you have any, I apologize if I missed this, but if you have any kind of thoughts on the near-term outlook here. And then, Tony, maybe a bigger picture question. I don't know, probably not, but there was a Midwest that actually sold its insurance unit for what I thought was a very, very healthy revenue multiple. I know it's a business historically you've been pretty dedicated to and happy with, but just curious about what your thoughts are there, particularly if we're you know, in a position where your loan growth is good and a little extra capital wouldn't hurt, is that an option you would consider or no? And then just, again, reiterate, just any thoughts on the near-term non-interest income guide would be great.
spk03: Sure. You know, it's not – we recognize the value of our insurance entity. However, you know, they're producing somewhere around 40% return on that investment. We don't see this strategy – peaking out, I think it can continue to elevate. And it's part of our strategic plan to have a greater percentage of our revenue be comprised of non-spread income. So I think it's an important part of our strategic planning direction. And while that's out there and I'm aware of it, I think it's a And it's also a great value add for our customers. So that's something that is entwined in there, and it's very hard to decouple relative to our strategy. So while that's out there, I think right now it's not a strong probability, but you can't ever say no to anything in our business.
spk02: Yeah, and we like the diversified revenue stream. We've got a 35% EBITDA margin in the business community. Contributing nicely, I wouldn't touch it. Just to add to that, Beacon Trust also had a nice quarter. We see AUM back up to $3.7 billion at the end of the period, $3.6 billion for the quarter. Net new clients of eight, about a 22.5% net margin on that business, too. So also contributing nicely. Correct. As far as outlook with total non-interest income, probably being a little conservative, but I just kind of peg it at about $20 million a quarter in the near term.
spk07: Okay. That's very helpful. Thank you guys for taking my questions and all the other callers this morning. Appreciate it. Thanks, Mike. Thanks, Mike.
spk01: Your next question is from Manuel Navas of DA Davidson. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
spk06: Hey, good morning. As the NIM stabilizes, do you think that NII dollars trough in the third quarter or more in the fourth quarter? On a quarterly basis, you know, Lakeland will shift things.
spk02: Yeah, yeah. Everything gets thrown up when the deal closes. But I think fourth quarter is when we were looking for the NII to trough.
spk06: Okay. And then what's the rough cash flows on securities if that's part of the funding profile?
spk02: It typically throws off between $16 and $20 million a month.
spk06: And with the kind of the movement of the NIM, in the NIM trajectory, what are you kind of assuming Through the cycle deposit betas and kind of where noninterest-bearing deposit mix ends up.
spk02: Yeah, we're at 25 percent through the cycle thus far. I think we're assuming something around a 32 for the full projection period. Sorry, what was the other question?
spk06: Noninterest-bearing deposit mix percentage, like where does it kind of settle out? How much more could it cross?
spk02: or 23, 24, I would agree.
spk06: That's really helpful. It's probably early. Do you have any thoughts on kind of how the environment may have shifted kind of the combined targets for Lakeland or kind of more to come on that, I guess? But just any initial thoughts on that?
spk02: Yeah, I think it's a little too early to go out there until we get the balance sheets combined and see where the environment stands at that combination date. It would be too speculative.
spk06: Okay, very fair. I appreciate the comments. Thank you.
spk01: There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call over to Tony Labosetto for closing remarks.
spk03: Thank you. Well, thank you everyone for being on the call. As we know, these are challenging times, but I feel really confident in the management team at Provident, and I think we'll tackle these challenges head on and outperform. So to that end, we look forward to getting together next quarter and sharing with you our results. Have a good day.
spk01: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer