This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
Parsons Corporation
10/30/2024
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the third quarter 2024 Parsons Corporation Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in the listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you would need to press star 11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would like now to turn the conference over to your speaker today, Dave Spiele, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Thanks, Michelle. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today to discuss our third quarter 2024 financial results. Please note that we provide the presentation slides on the Investor Relations section of our website. On the call with me today are Carrie Smith, Chair, President, and CEO, and Matt Opolis, CFO. Today, Carrie will discuss our corporate strategy and operational highlights, and then Matt will provide an overview of our third quarter financial results, as well as a review of our increased 2024 guidance. We then will close with a question and answer session. Management may also make forward-looking statements during the call regarding future events, anticipated future trends, and the anticipated future performance of the company. We caution you that such statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. These risk factors are described in our Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and other SEC filings, including the quarterly report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2024 on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Please refer to our earnings press release for Parson's complete forward-looking statement disclosure. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements. Management will also reference non-GAAP financial measures during this call. We remind you that these non-GAAP financial measures are not a substitute for the comparable GAAP measures. And now we'll turn the call over to Carrie.
Thank you, Dave. Good morning, and welcome to Parson's third quarter 2024 earnings call. We are very pleased with our third quarter and year-to-date performance as we delivered record Q3 results for total revenue, organic revenue growth, net income, adjusted EBITDA, operating cash flow, and contract awards. We also achieved strong growth across the portfolio, delivering over 20% organic growth for the sixth consecutive quarter, while efficiently managing the business as bottom line growth continues to outpace our robust top line growth. In addition, we continue to leverage our strong balance sheet to invest in software and integrated solutions, as well as execute accretive acquisitions that either provide distinguished defense capabilities to counter near-peer threats or strengthen our engineering expertise and increase our geographical footprint in high-growth infrastructure markets. As a result of our strong operating performance in our Black Signal acquisition, we are raising our four-year revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and cash flow guidance ranges. Our record results reflect the hard work and dedication of the entire person's team to deliver on our customers' national security and infrastructure missions with the urgency and operational relevance required in today's fast-paced and dynamic environment. For the third quarter, we generated $1.8 billion in revenue for the first time in our company's history and delivered organic revenue growth of 26%. During the third quarter, We also deliver double-digit total revenue growth in both business segments, illustrating the strength of our portfolio. This is now the 11th consecutive quarterly record for revenue and 12th consecutive record quarterly for adjusted EBITDA. I will also note that for the third quarter and for the first nine months of 2024, total adjusted EBITDA growth exceeded revenue growth. In the third quarter, total revenue increased 28% while adjusted EBITDA grew by 31%. And for the first nine months of 2024, total revenue grew 27% and adjusted EBITDA increased 36%. By driving EBITDA growth faster than our robust revenue growth, our margins expanded 20 basis points in the third quarter and 60 basis points for the first nine months of the year. In addition, We had an exceptional quarter for operating cash flow and increased our trailing 12-month cash flow by more than 90% from the prior year period. Our strong free cash flow and balance sheet support our ability to continue to make internal investments and accretive acquisitions to strengthen our capabilities and drive long-term growth and margin expansion. These investments are enabling us to win larger and more profitable contracts, as well as new business across both segments and all six end markets. During the third quarter, we won four single award contracts over $100 million each and reported a book-to-bill ratio of 1.0 times, which represents a 24% increase in contact award activity over the prior year period. In addition, the critical infrastructure segment achieved a book-to-bill ratio of 1.0 or greater for the 16th consecutive quarter. In critical infrastructure during Q3, we were awarded strategic transportation and Middle East projects. In North America, we received a new award for the Georgia State Route 400 express lanes, where Parsons will serve as the lead designer. This $4.6 billion project will add new express lanes and use state-of-the-art traffic, incident management, and digital twin systems. Under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Georgia is expected to receive at least $11 billion for roads and highways, bridges, public transportation, airports, and resilient infrastructure. We were awarded a new lead design contract for the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation. On this $1.66 billion project, we are the lead designer for the city center, gateway, and stations. The scope of work includes the design of six rail stations and approximately three miles of elevated rail guideway and engineering services during construction. Over the past 16 months, we've won five of the largest North America transportation design projects in our company's history. The two wins this quarter, along with the recent Hudson River Tunnel Project, JFK International Airport Roadways, and Newark Bay Bridge wins, demonstrate the success we are having in the transportation market. These awards also show that federal, state, and local funding continues to flow at a healthy pace. Our momentum in the Middle East continues, as we achieved a book-to-bill ratio of 1.2 times in the third quarter. And we currently have the largest qualified pipeline in our company's history in both the Middle East and Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, we were awarded contracts valued at more than $200 million, including two large program management awards. In addition, third quarter headcount in both the Middle East and Saudi reached an all-time high and continues to grow. We are very excited about the future growth opportunities in the region and continue to invest to capitalize on this unique opportunity. In our federal solutions segment, We received option awards totaling $287 million with a confidential customer during the third quarter. We also booked an option period totaling $245 million on our general services administration contract. This contract supports the Department of Defense and its strategic partners in delivering global quick reaction capabilities, leveraging advanced technology solutions across the all domain battle space. We were awarded $134 million of contracts in the Indo-Pacom region. We won a three-year $69 million contract on Kwajalein, the Marshall Islands, to provide Army family housing. We also were awarded $37 million in signals intelligence and cyber operations work. In addition, we received two contracts worth $28 million to perform advanced geophysical classification and unexploded ordnance work on Guam and upgrade utility monitoring and control systems. Parson's presence in Guam, Kwajalein, and Hawaii continues to strengthen and is aligned to the fiscal year 25 Pacific Deterrence Initiative of $9.9 billion for targeted investment to enhance force posture, infrastructure, presence, and readiness of the United States and its allies in the Indo-Pacific region. Finally, we booked an option period totaling $54 million on the Combatant Command's Cyber Mission Support Contract. This contract includes support of multi-domain operations across cyber, space, air, ground, and maritime. During the third quarter, we announced and closed our Black Signal Technologies acquisition in an accretive deal valued at $204 million. This company is a next-generation digital signal processing, electronic warfare, and cybersecurity provider built to counter near-peer threats. Black Signal expands persons' customer base across the Department of Defense and intelligence community and significantly strengthens persons' positioning within offensive cyber operations and electronic warfare, while adding new capabilities in the counter-space radio frequency domain. This strategic acquisition provides a strong, cleared workforce, 90% intellectual property-enabled offerings, 67% directed sole source work, and an expanded customer set, enabling immediate revenue synergies. After the third quarter ended, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire BCC Engineering, one of the Southeast region's leading transportation engineering firms, in an all-cash transaction valued at $230 million. BCC is a full-service engineering firm that provides planning, design, and management services for transportation, civil, and structural engineering projects in Florida, Georgia, Texas, South Carolina, and Puerto Rico. This acquisition will strengthen our position as an infrastructure leader while expanding our reach in the southeastern United States. an area where the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act has provided approximately $100 billion in Federal Highway Administration formula funds for fiscal years 2022 through 2026. BCC was our top-ranked acquisition target for geographical expansion into the Florida market and will enable us to become the number one consultant in South Florida. BCC will also double our presence and resources working with the Georgia Department of Transportation. These two acquisitions are consistent with our strategy of completing preemptive accretive acquisitions of companies we know well and have revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA margins of 10% or more. We continue to have an active M&A pipeline in both segments. and we will use our strong balance sheet to complete accretive acquisitions that provide technology differentiation and drive both growth and margin expansion. In summary, our record performance so far this year demonstrates we are executing on our strategy to move up the value chain to drive exceptional revenue growth, margins, and cash flow. For the first nine months this year, we have achieved 25% organic revenue growth expanded margins by 60 basis points, and increased operating cash flow by 82% to $397 million. We continue to leverage our strong balance sheet and free cash flow to make internal investments and acquire strategic assets that differentiate our solutions through software and advanced technologies. We are capitalizing on the market tailwinds and unprecedented global infrastructure spend and the evolving geopolitical environment that is driving increased demand for our national security solutions. Given our strong operating performance and our outlook for the remainder of the year, we are raising all guidance metrics. With that, I'll turn the call over to Matt to provide more details on our third quarter financial results and our increased fiscal year 2024 guidance. Matt?
Thank you, Carrie. As Kerry indicated, our momentum continued through the third quarter of 2024 and was highlighted by record third quarter results for total revenue, organic revenue growth, net income, adjusted EBITDA, operating cash flow, and contract awards. We're very pleased with our results, particularly against tougher comparable periods given the significant growth realized in the second half of 2023. Our revenue growth remains strong across the portfolio with double-digit growth in both segments. Turning to our results. Third quarter revenue of $1.8 billion increased $392 million or 28% from the prior year period and was up 26% on an organic basis. For perspective, the significant growth was achieved off our record third quarter in 2023 where we grew $284 million or 25%. Organic growth for the third quarter was driven by the ramp up of recent contract wins and growth on existing contracts and our critical infrastructure protection and cyber intelligence markets. SG&A expenses for the third quarter were 13.6% of total revenue compared to 15.6% in the prior year period as we continue to focus on efficient growth across the portfolio while investing in the future through technology, business development, and hiring and retention initiatives. On a year-to-date basis, SG&A as a percentage of revenue was 13.8% compared to 16% in 2023. Adjusted EBITDA of $167 million increased to $39 million, or 31%, and adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 20 basis points to 9.2%. These year-over-year increases were driven primarily by higher volume on margin-accretive contracts and a deliberate focus on indirect cost management. As with revenue, our adjusted EBITDA growth was compared to a very strong third quarter in 2023, where we experienced growth of 24% over the prior year period. On a year-to-date basis, adjusted EBITDA margin at the Parsons level increased 60 basis points to 9.1%, compared to 8.5% in 2023. I'll turn now to our operating segments, starting first with Federal Solutions, where third quarter revenue increased by $325 million, or 42% from the third quarter of 2023. This increase was driven by organic growth of 39% and the contribution from our ceiling tech and black signal acquisitions. Organic growth was driven primarily by the ramp-up of recent contract wins and growth on existing contracts in our critical infrastructure protection and cyber and intelligence markets. Federal solutions adjusted EBITDA increased by $55 million, or 84%, from the third quarter of 2023. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased 260 basis points to 10.9% from 8.3% in the prior year period. These increases were driven primarily by increased volume on accretive contracts, contributions from high margin acquisitions, and improved program execution. Moving now to our critical infrastructure segment. Third quarter revenue increased 10% from the prior year period on both an organic and inorganic basis. Growth was driven by higher volume in both our North America and Middle East infrastructure portfolios. Critical infrastructure adjusted EBITDA decreased by $16 million, or 25% from the third quarter of 2023. Adjusted EBITDA margin decreased 6.7% from 9.8% in the prior year period. The adjusted EBITDA decreases were driven by a write-down on the legacy program that is expected to reach substantial completion in Q4 of 2024. On a pro forma basis, our CI adjusted EBITDA margin would have been 9.7%, excluding this $23.5 million write-down. Next, I'll discuss cash flow and balance sheet metrics. During the third quarter of 2024, we generated $299 million of operating cash flow, compared to $204 million in Q3 of 2023. On a trailing 12-month basis, we generated a record $587 million of operating cash flow, a 91% increase over the prior 12-month period. These increases were primarily driven by strong collections across the portfolio and improved profitability. During the third quarter, net DSO declined year over year by 14 days to 51 days, a record low. Capital expenditures totaled $12 million in the third quarter of 2024, which is relatively consistent with prior year periods. CapEx continues to be well controlled and remains in line with our planned spend of less than 1% of annual revenue, while continuing to invest in strategic areas like expanding classified facilities and space technology to support future growth. Free cash conversion was 247% for the third quarter and 139% on a trailing 12-month basis, with an intentional focus on contract execution, settlement of legacy claims, and improved cash management and collections. Our balance sheet remained strong as we ended the third quarter with a net debt leverage ratio of 1.2 times to include the impact of the all-cash acquisition of Black Signals. On a pro forma basis, net leverage would be 1.6 times after the recently announced $230 million all-cash acquisition of BCC. A strong cash flow is enabling us to continue to make strategic internal investments and accretive acquisitions to support our long-term growth objectives. Turning to bookings. On a trailing 12-month basis, contract awards increased 13%, and our book-to-bill ratio was 1.0 times. In our critical infrastructure segment, we achieved a book-to-bill ratio of 1.1 in the third quarter, marking the 16th consecutive quarter with a book-to-bill ratio of 1.0 or greater. Third quarter contract award activity increased 24% year-over-year to $1.8 billion for a book-to-bill ratio of 1.0 times. With $8.8 billion of backlog, 66% of which is currently funded, and $13 billion of awards not reflected in book-to-bill or backlog, We continue to have confidence in our ability to deliver growth. Now let's turn to our guidance. We are increasing our 2024 guidance ranges as a result of our record third quarter performance, black signal acquisition, and our favorable outlook for the remainder of the year. For 2024, we are increasing our revenue range by $250 million at the midpoint to $6.6 to $6.8 billion. This represents total revenue growth of 23% at the midpoint, and 22% on an organic basis. Additionally, we are increasing our adjusted EBITDA range by $30 million at the midpoint of the range. We now expect adjusted EBITDA to be between $590 and $620 million, which represents 30% growth at the midpoint of the range and continues to exceed revenue growth. At the midpoint of our increased revenue and adjusted EBITDA ranges, we are increasing our margin outlook by 10 basis points to 9.0%, which is a 50 basis point improvement to fiscal 2023 results. We are also increasing our cash flow guidance. We now expect operating cash flow to be between $425 and $465 million. At the midpoint of the guidance range, we expect free cash flow conversion to be approximately 100% of adjusted net income. Other key assumptions in connection with our 2024 guidance are outlined on slide 11 in today's PowerPoint presentation located on our investor relations website. In summary, we've had an exceptional first nine months of the year with great top and bottom line and cash flow results. We're putting the balance sheet to use after announcing two strategic acquisitions over the last two months, which we believe will further enhance our technology offerings, geographical footprint, and support long-term growth. Our execution has been strong across all business units and major geographies, and we are confident in our ability to achieve our increased 2024 guidance ranges. With that, I'll turn the call back to Kerry.
Thank you, Matt. In closing, I'm very pleased with our company's performance through the first nine months of the year. Our operating results continue to exceed our expectations as we once again delivered record results across all guidance metrics. Our 19,000 employees are consistently executing and taking advantage of the strong tailwinds that are positively impacting both of our business segments. I am thankful to be leading such a great team And I expect our momentum to continue, given our portfolio is well aligned to important macro environment trends and two well-funded segments and six growing and enduring markets.
Thank you. And as a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. And the first question will come from Sheila Kayaglu with Jeffries. Your line is now open.
Good morning, guys, and great quarter as always. If I could ask two questions, maybe first on the top line, just given the performance has been so stellar. That $13 billion unbooked pipeline is relatively unchanged, but still a very significant Good book to bill of one times, which seems nearly impossible with your growth rate. How do we think about as we enter 2025, what your growth rate could potentially look like?
Thank you, Shaylin. Good morning. So the top line has remained relatively flat on the awarded not booked. And the reason for that is that we booked four of our repeats between July 2021 and January of 2023. So it kind of reached a peak because they were all greater than $2 billion each. What I think is important to look at is a combination of the $13 billion awarded not booked plus the $8.8 billion in backlog, which is up significantly over 2022. I would also recommend that the 66% of funded backlog, and that's the amount that we expect to convert within the next 12 to 18 months, is very strong and probably close to an industry high. Looking forward from a top-line perspective, we anticipate being at mid-single digits or better, as we've indicated.
Great. And if I could ask one more, if you don't mind. On CI, the margins extra charge were closer to 9% once again. They fluctuated quite a bit, Matt, over the past few quarters. What's the right way to think about the run rate margin once legacy programs are run off?
Yeah, thanks, Sheila. I'd say, you know, we talk a lot about CI with the underlying business kind of performing in the 9 to 10 range. Long-term goal, of course, is double digits. We have, you know, a path to get there, but it's, you know, it's kind of a slow trudge as we get through these programs, to your point. You know, we were expecting kind of wrap up that program. We have a couple-week delay, which is not unexpected as you kind of get to the end of these programs, but, you know, the $23 million charge within the quarter was a little bit of the schedule slip, and then As we get to close out and kind of negotiations with customer on closeout, that was the biggest driver behind the charge. But generally speaking, we think, you know, that underlying margin for the backlog that we've recently booked and the work that we're really performing on is kind of north of 9%. So it's kind of just at a slope at which we can get there. I've kind of said, you know, 20 to 30 basis points per year of margin expansion. If you think about the federal business being kind of stable, you'd think 40 to 60 basis points from CI per year. So that's the way we're kind of looking at it, Sheila.
I would also add we're really excited to get rid of these legacy programs. These were jobs that were bid back in the 2010 to 2015 timeframe. As we entered the year, we only had two of these remaining. We wrapped one up in the first quarter, and this last one, as Matt indicated, is just a couple of weeks away. We're 98% complete right now. So it's really exciting to have those in the rare view mirror because improved performance execution on a critical infrastructure site is going to be the biggest driver of margin expansion. Thank you. Thank you.
And our next question comes from Andrew Whitman with Bayard. Your line is now open.
Oh, great. Good morning and thank you for taking my questions, Matt. I guess I wanted to just understand the quarter a little bit better here because I was reading some stuff in the queue that it seems like it relates to the CI, equity and income charge. You said on your comments here $23.5 million write-down. In the queue, it says $6.7 million write-down. And so I was hoping you just could bridge the gap. Maybe there were some positive write-ups or closeouts that were offsets. Maybe can you just help explain some of the movie pieces so that we can understand that segment's performance a little bit better?
Yeah, sure. Good question, Andy. So we'll talk about equity and earnings first. So to your point, we did take a smaller, obviously the $23.5 million was the outsized impact for the quarter, so that's why we kind of gave the pro form off that. But additionally, the program that we had, so supply chain risk last year, we've kind of been fighting our way through completing design and kind of a little bit of a schedule extension, some approvals around the Parsons design there has kind of extended out. So we did take a $6 million charge within equity and earnings, to your point. The 23.5 would roll through the CI operating results, so it wouldn't be in equity and earnings. It would be in the normal profit. So kind of combined, to your point, maybe you could think about it as $30 million worth of total impacts. There were some favorable adjustments as well to a smaller extent. But all in all, if I did kind of a pro forma on both of those, excluding the 23.5, we'd go from 6.7 to 9.7. And then if we also excluded the 6.5, we'd probably be in the 10 and a half range. But again, I think I would say, you know, some of the smaller ones, there'll be fluctuations any given quarter.
Got it. Yeah. Including some of those positives, maybe some of those positives eat into that six. Then we play this mental accounting game of what's in and what's out. But I appreciate the color on that one. And I just Kerry, it's coming up a lot in investor conversations. You addressed it in your prepared remarks, but I think it's probably worth some airtime on the Middle East. Some of your competitors have slowed some of the scope there and have talked about being slow walked on some of the projects. Maybe you could just, I mean, you talked about the growth there. You talked about the book to build being in the Middle East being better than your segment average. But maybe if you could just talk about what you're seeing there and the confidence that you have and the work that you're on today continuing at full steam ahead, as well as the prospect of future wins there as you head through 2020 to backfill the good work that you're doing today.
Sure. Thank you, Andy. I actually just returned from there, so it's a perfect question for this time. And Matt leaves to go there next week. So it was terrific to be on the ground and see firsthand the tremendous progress that we're making, both in Saudi Arabia programs as well as in the UAE. Overall, the region is performing as expected. There's always going to be fluctuations from one quarter to another. But if you look at year to date, our Saudi business has grown 17%. And this is following a year in which the Middle East revenue grew last year 33%. We expect to have for the full year double digit growth within the Middle East as well as year to date. their meeting and exceeding all their key performance indicators as expected. We continue to win our fair share of work. We highlighted in the second quarter we won over $160 million in Saudi wins, and we won more than $200 million in the third quarter. So our book to bill was 1.2 for the Middle East and 1.3 for Saudi. And again, this is part of the critical infrastructure group continuing to have 16 consecutive quarters of want to book to bill or better. I'll also highlight that the funding is still on the uptick. So when you look at the ramp up, we don't even expect the funding in the Middle East to peak until about the 2030 to 2032 timeframe. We're at an all-time high this quarter for both the pipeline and for headcount. Saudi's going to be on the world stage many times coming up over the next decade. They're hosting major events like the Asian Winter Games in 2029. They've got the World Expo in 2030, and they have the FIFA World Cup in 2034. So a lot of these projects need to be done in time for those critical events. And infrastructure is going to continue to get prioritized and receive significant funding in Saudi Arabia. I'd also highlight we're on pretty much all the premier programs over there, which is very exciting. I had the opportunity to visit Qadiyah once again, the world's largest entertainment city. We're working on NEOM. Matt's going to be visiting that next week. We just were awarded a repeat for the King Salmon Park. We're involved in King Abdullah Financial District. We're involved in Daria Gates. We're involved in Al-Sadah. So almost every major contract over there, Parsons is program manager, and these projects continue to come. So we've got a really bright future. I would mention in addition to Saudi Arabia, though, we've also seen growth in the UAE and Qatar. And that's basically on the back of other infrastructure investments. If you'll recall, there was this big storm event, which was very unfortunate this year. So Parsons is involved in a lot of stormwater drainage improvement programs in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar. And then we've seen a resurgence in the UAE property market that remains very robust and a lot of associated development since there's a lot of people that are moving into the country. And this doesn't even include an area that we're starting to look at, which is opportunities for the federal business defense in Saudi and in the UAE, because we do have such a great reputation. So bottom line, they're performing as expected. They're going to exceed their plan, and I'm very excited about the opportunities there.
I appreciate that. One last technical question. In the past, you guys have commented on your various win rates, but maybe – you could inform us what your win rate was in the quarter. You have it by segment. That's interesting as well. But just overall, it would be good to understand the character there.
Yes, the win rate for the quarter is 74%. The win rate year-to-date is 75%.
Thank you very much. Have a good day.
Thank you. And our next question comes from Kaivon Rumor with TD Cohen. Your line is now open.
Yes, thanks so much and terrific quarter again. Your engineering portion of federal solutions grew 70% and you mentioned critical infrastructure protection. I mean, is that that one very large contract that you have with a confidential customer?
Yes, so we're seeing growth on that contract, but we're also seeing growth in other areas. I would highlight industrial-based modernization as an example, where we're doing a lot of the Army ammunition plant work. We're also seeing some growth in the biometrics efforts that we have in place. And then we had the wins in the Indo-Pacom region, particularly excited about the Kwajalein win. We had been performing Kwajalein airfield. We won the first Kwajalein housing contract. Now we just won the second Kwajalein housing contract. And we want some additional work in trying to clean up the island of Guam so that the Missile Defense Agency come in and put equipment in for defense of Guam. So excited about our whole engineering systems business.
So you've been doing great, but I think you mentioned at one point that the time, you know, the duration of engineering contracts can be a little bit shorter than normal fed solution contracts. Is there any worry that, you know, particularly this one critical infrastructure protection contract is very big, but it could sunset relatively quickly at some point, or should it just continue on at a relatively stable rate?
Yeah, I would say that's a great question. So where we're at on that contract, right now the first option period extends through February 2025. We do have a second option period that if it's exercised, would run through February 2026. The customer did recently advise that even though we have very strong performance, that they're considering whether or not they're going to exercise the second option period to extend it or otherwise repeat the contract. If they do repeat the contract, we intend to submit a proposal for the continued performance of the work. And I will note that we have an average of 95% repeat win rates. including 98% year-to-date re-compete win rates. At the present time, though, there's no announced acquisition strategy, and there's no draft or final RFP. So what this means, we had indicated that we expected our 2025 re-compete percent to be around 10%, which is what we have in any given year. So I would say right now we anticipate our re-compete for 2025 to be somewhere in the range of 5% to 15%. And it's dependent on that contract plus one other contract that we continue to receive extensions. I mean, what I'm excited about as we look into next year, you know, hopefully we'll be around the 10%, but at the high end, 15%. We've got a very strong repeat win rate. We continue to win extensive work off a higher base, 1.1 times booked a bill year to date. Continue to acquire more companies, two this year, potentially three. And we've had six quarters of greater than 20% organic growth. And our awards activity, as Matt highlighted during his script, has increased 24% over the prior year period and 13% on a trailing 12-month off a higher base. So we have a lot of momentum in the business.
Terrific. Great answer. Thanks so much.
Thanks. Thanks, Scott. And our next question comes from Toby Summer with TruWisp. Your line is now open.
Thanks. When we think about the guidance raise, could you break down the contribution from organic performance in acquisitions? And at this point, with the acquisitions already in hand, what is the acquired revenue that will fold into the P&L in 2025?
Yeah, so Toby, let me give you a kind of a, so final three months of the quarter or total revenue growth at the midpoint is just under 13%, of which about, you know, 12% is organic, so relatively minor contribution within the fourth quarter. When we look at next year, we expect Black Signal will contribute just over $100 million. And then BCC, which is not in any guidance yet, would be an additional, you know, over $100 million. So you can probably think about $200 million worth of inorganic, maybe a little bit lighter than that because we have black signal for a few months this year. So I'd say somewhere, you know, call it the high 100s to low 200, but we can give more details in the later. So about $80 million is from our black signal. $80 to $90 million is black signal. and then BCC would be another 100 plus.
Thank you. Could you talk about what the outlook is for revenue synergies associated with BCC and Black Signal? Historically, you've acquired firms with whom you have a relationship. You've either worked or bid on things together or competing and sometimes had line of sight into near-term opportunities.
Yes, I'll start with Black Signal. As I mentioned, they provide digital signal processing, electronic warfare, and cybersecurity. When you look at their capabilities, they fit in very nicely with Parsons' capabilities. We're both doing digital signal work, but we look at different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum and also for different customers. On the cybersecurity side, we're both involved in offensive. The legacy Parsons was more historically on the Department of Defense side. Black Signal is more on the intelligence community side. And then when you look at space, we see a lot of synergies to develop a space training range. Black Signal is the hack-a-set market leader. They use on-orbit digital twin technologies, and they basically create a cyber wargaming platform for space systems. This is complementary with Parsons capability, a system that we have called T-REX, which is an emulator system. So we're combining those capabilities. As you noted, we do buy companies that we've worked with quite a bit. We've known Black Signal for a long time and also their legacy companies, and it really fit in nice with us. We've already been able to capitalize on synergies, particularly on the GSA growth that I mentioned. BCC is very exciting. They will be adding about 450 employees to our business. We both have presence in Florida. We both have presence in Georgia as well as Texas, South Carolina. I would say they are much stronger in Florida, and we're going to be consolidating the Legacy Persons Florida activities under them. Their headquarters is in Miami. They're involved in four areas. They do design services. They do construction engineering and inspection, design build, and general engineering capabilities. Also, I mentioned during the script, but they double the amount of resources that we have working in the Georgia Department of Transportation. We're really excited about that, particularly with our recent win on the state Route 400 job, because there's a lot of big opportunities coming up within Georgia. I will note on BCC, they also have 50% fixed price, 50% time and material. So we anticipate that that's going to help us on the margin side as well on CI.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. Thanks, Toby.
And the next question comes from Alex Dwyer with KeyBank Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Hi, Carrie, Matt, and Dave. Good morning.
Morning, Alex.
Good morning. So I think Parsons has now won five of the largest North American transportation projects in the history of the company over the past year or so. Can you talk about the pipeline of seeing more of these large transportation projects? Are you still seeing many more of these out there that could be awarded in the next year or so? And kind of what your capacity is to take more of these on?
Yeah, thanks, Alex, for that question. We have five of the largest. We had mentioned the Gateway project. That's the largest rail and transit project for the Hudson River Tunnel. It's the largest infrastructure project occurring in the United States, and we're really proud to be the program manager there. We were awarded the JFK Roads and Highways. Those of you living in New York City will be happy that we're improving the area around the airport. And we were awarded the Newark Bay Bridge, over $140 million project for us. We are a world leader in bridge design, having designed over 4,500 bridges, and particularly a leader in long-span bridges. And then the two awards that we just highlighted this quarter with Hawaii Heart Rail and Transit System, which is the next phase of that extension, as well as State Route 400 job. What we're particularly excited about is we've had 16 consecutive quarters of greater than one note booked a bill. And the IIJA is still on the ramp up. Recent data shows there was, out of the total, $1.2 trillion of funding. $550 billion of that was new. And we're nearly three years into the five-year law. Actually, May of this year was the halfway point. Forty percent of the IIJA funds have been announced, and that covers 60,000 projects. So this leaves $720 billion yet to be allocated. And I would note that they're announced. That means they're captured from agency press releases, but that doesn't mean they're yet awarded, which is an actual obligation. So we're still very much on the upramp here. I would also indicate that state and local are contributing quite a bit of funding as well. Once they saw the certainty of the IIJA passage in November of 2021, they started to contribute. As far as capacity, we're doing a terrific job hiring, terrific job retaining. We have our lowest retention rates that we've ever had within the North America critical infrastructure business. So we're going to continue to pursue and win these large jobs throughout the United States, particularly focused on our Tier 1 states.
And, Alex, just to add some numbers to what Kerry mentioned, I'm looking at kind of Q1 2023, about $17 billion worth of pipeline within infrastructure. Right now we're almost at $21 billion, so you're up about 23.5% over the 18 months. So really strong evidence of continued growth there.
Got it. Okay. Thank you so much. And then I guess just I wanted to ask about just the general hiring needs across the entire company as we think about the next 12 months. I guess like over this past year, has there been areas of the business where it's been more challenging to hire or less challenging to hire? And then just talk about where the business development teams are most focused on hiring for the next year plan.
Yes, I would say we've done a great job on both hiring and retention. The easiest area to hire will be the critical infrastructure business, Middle East. We actually hire from about 50 countries around the world today. and also critical infrastructure North America would be pretty easy. When you get to the federal side, part of the engineered systems, particularly the group that is not cleared, is not very difficult to hire. So the highest bar is always going to be that cleared area of our portfolio. But again, I'm happy with what we've done there. From a retention perspective, we measure ourselves against PWC industry benchmarks. We are lower than the benchmarks, so we're doing better than the industry average in both the federal and the critical infrastructure segments. From a business development perspective, we're going to be focused, I'm going to say, in the same areas that we have been. Our six core end markets, all of which are growing between 5% to 12% compound annual growth rate and continuing to hire their both BD talent as well as performance execution talent to get ahead of winning these large jobs.
Thank you.
Thank you so much. And the next question comes from Josh Sullivan with the Benchmark Company. Your line is open.
Good morning.
Good morning.
Good morning, Josh. Carrie, to your credit, you know, you've been very deliberate in your willingness to invest in any geographic region, you know, especially when growth wasn't obvious. But, you know, in your opening comments, you know, you call it a geographic expansion. So just curious what the current philosophy on that global expansion is. Should we expect you're just looking in the same regions which have been delivering, or are there any new opportunities opening up? And I'm thinking of Europe there.
Yes, so I would say we have been very deliberate. We're fortunate that we're in the right places right now. If you look at the North America growth with the infrastructure bill not peaking until the 27 timeframe, if you look at the Middle East not peaking until the 2030, 2032 timeframe, I would say there is, if I talk about any expansion within federal, we highlighted Indopaycom. That's been a very big focus for us because we have a purpose-built federal solutions company that we've put together to basically outpace near-peer threats. So the type of work that we're doing, whether it's on the defense and intelligence side, signals and intelligence, electronic warfare, information operations, cybersecurity, or it's on the engineered system side with environmental remediation and infrastructure builds, INDOPACOM is going to be a significant area of focus and expansion. And as I mentioned a little bit earlier, we're also going to start to look at opportunities in the Middle East because we have such a strong branding and such high win rates, we feel that we can take our federal portfolio there as well. Within critical infrastructure, we're going to stay laser focused on North America as well as the Middle East. We have a small presence in Europe. We do some rail and transit work in Marseille and Paris, France, and also in the Netherlands. So we might see a little expansion off of that. But when you're in a position where your growth is so strong, we just really need to continue to focus and deliver.
Great. And then kind of a similar question on software capabilities that you mentioned. You know, how are you approaching this? You know, obviously, you know, it can be a difficult expansion, but also a very fruitful one. But, you know, we're seeing other partnerships announced, like with Palantir and L3. Or should we think of, you know, your approach being more organic?
Yes. So I would say we partner on a selective basis to win certain pursuits. We have such a strong software base. It's really our key differentiator. And when we talk about kind of purpose building the federal solutions portfolio, it's all been about software. I think hardware is going to become more commoditized, and it's really key areas like digital signal processing where we're one of the industry leaders. Artificial intelligence, again, where we've had a strong presence for the last couple of decades, and we applied almost every program that we do. Software is going to be the nugget. In addition to federal, I'd highlight a couple areas within critical infrastructure, mostly our intelligent infrastructure transportation business and our advanced traffic management system work, our intelligent intersection as a service work. Those are also heavily software driven. We use an agile approach. We have a DevSecOps secure capability, and we're going to continue to lean in on software.
Great. Thank you for the time.
Thank you.
And our next question comes from Louis de Palma with William Blair. Your line is now open.
Carrie, Matt, and Dave, good morning and congrats on the results.
Thank you very much, Louis.
Carrie and Matt, investors often ask about the difference between your recent string of 20% plus organic growth and the long-term guidance for mid-single-digit growth. And we were wondering, is there anything specific that would prevent this year's momentum and last year's momentum from continuing next year?
Well, I did mention the one confidential contract we're awaiting to see if the customer is going to exercise the option here or if they're going to keep it. I think the key thing is for us making sure that we beat and raise and set guidance that's realistic. We anticipate as we go into next year, we'll probably have our usual runoff of programs in the amount of about $80 to $100 million, which is typical for us. Recompetes, as I mentioned, about 5% to 15%. But I would say continue doing what we're doing. We've got to get the high win rates. as we've been able to deliver and move up the value chain, bid and win larger jobs, and continue to execute.
Great, Carrie. And at the AUSA conference, you showcased your digital twins software. And we were wondering, is this software being utilized for several of these recent large transportation, infrastructure, IIJA contracts, such as the Newport Bay Bridge, JFK Airports, Hudson River Tunnel, Englewood Project. And are you able to use this digital twin software for both federal solutions and infrastructure?
Yes, so we are able to use digital twin capabilities for both federal and infrastructure, and we share those capabilities across portfolio. I would say our biggest application is with the Missile Defense Agency that we've been applying it. We have a framework that we've built out called Parsons Digital Engineering Framework, and we've been applying it there for quite a while. We also now have digital twin capability on orbit with the Black Signal acquisition. On the infrastructure side of the house, we've been applying digital twins mostly to our airport projects.
Great. And following up on these transportation infrastructure projects, how should we think of the revenue trajectory and duration as, you know, it seems that these are fairly long-term contracts and also related Is the scope of work for these contracts significantly different from your legacy contracts that have featured write-downs? And are there any risks for write-downs for these types of IIJA contracts?
Yeah, let me take the second part first. We have de-risked our portfolio starting when I took over as Chief Operating Officer November 2018. And we've gone back to what I'm going to call our core roots. The core roots of the company is that we're a designer. We do program management, and we do owner's engineer, where we help the owner deliver the technical design. So we have stopped bidding those legacy programs back in the 2015 timeframe. That's why we're really happy this year to be wrapping up the last one of those. So the projects that we've won, the one in Hawaii, the rail and transit system, and the State Route 400, We are the lead design subcontractor on both of those. Again, it's what Parsons has done for 80 years since the company was created. So no, we don't anticipate write-downs like we've had on some of these legacy construction programs. When you look at our scope, because we are the designer, the majority of our work does get done early in the project. So if a project is five to eight years, we'll be done in the very early parts of that project. Good example is JFK. We're nearly done with the design on that project that we won about 16 months ago.
Great. Thanks, everyone.
Thanks, Louie. Thanks, Louie.
And our next question comes from Noah Poppenack with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
Hey, good morning, everyone.
Good morning, Noah.
kerry it sounds like you're saying there are uh two contracts mainly that are creating that um range that you're referencing of five to fifteen percent of re for recompete next year and you were talking uh about the one large confidential in the engineering business are you able to say what the second one is uh the second one is a contract that we continue to receive extensions right now we're extended through february
Those extensions may or may not continue indefinitely. We're waiting on some actions from the customer.
Okay. Okay. And, Matt, what's in the fourth quarter margin by segment approximately just to get to the full year EBITDA range?
Yes, right now, no, we have federal just call it kind of high nines, low tens, and then CI in the low sevens. So think of that as kind of constant quarter over quarter and a federal kind of a little bit lower than where they've been.
Okay. And maybe you could update us on what you're now expecting as the end timing of the remaining legacy work in CI and maybe also just talk about how you would expect that to progress sequentially from here?
Yes, so we really have just the one project, and we're expecting to meet with the customer within the next few weeks to achieve substantial completion.
Okay. So, Carrie, that had previously been expected inside of the third quarter, and now it's expected in the fourth quarter.
That's correct. There were some additional systems that were added that we had to process.
And I guess once that's complete, does the CI margin just kind of flip to what it's been adjusted for charges? Or is there, for some other reason, some more gradual ramp to it?
Yeah, I'd say no. Our goal is, of course, to kind of get to the adjusted number, but Carrie and I are kind of cautious. You know, substantial completion has some kind of trail to it where you're negotiating with customers and kind of completing the job. So I would say kind of that 40 to 60 basis points per year should get us there within a couple of years. But generally speaking, you know, the substantive write-downs that we've had will be behind us with substantial completion.
We've indicated 20 to 30 basis points at the person's level for our long-term guidance, and as Matt mentioned, we're expecting that to come from the CI segment.
Okay. Okay, great. Thank you so much. Thank you, Noel.
This is all the time that we do have for questions. I would like to turn the call back over to Dave Spilly for closing remarks.
Thank you for joining us this morning. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call. And we look forward to speaking with many of you over the coming weeks. And with that, we'll end today's call. Have a great day.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.