This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk02: Good morning and welcome to the ProPetro Holding Corporation second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing star then zero on your telephone keypad. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Matt Augustine, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
spk07: Matt Augustine Thank you, and good morning. We appreciate your participation in today's call. With me today is Chief Executive Officer Sam Sledge, Chief Financial Officer David Shorlimer, and President and Chief Operating Officer Adam Munoz. Yesterday afternoon, we released our earnings announcement for the second quarter of 2022. Please note that any comments we make on today's call regarding projections or our expectations for future events are forward-looking statements covered by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties. many of which are beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. We advise listeners to review our earnings release and risk factors discussed in our filings with the SEC. Also, during today's call, we will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our earnings release. Finally, after our prepared remarks, we will hold a question and answer session. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Sam.
spk04: Thanks, Matt, and good morning, everyone. We're excited to report another quarter of excellent operating and financial results generated by the ProPetro team. Our margin over market share strategy continues to prove to be the prudent way to navigate this cycle as our financial performance continues to improve. Major thanks to the entire ProPetro team for remaining focused and executing well during what is a dynamic time. Before we go into our highlights for the second quarter, I want to take a moment to provide our view on the state of the global energy industry and the North American pressure pumping market. It is apparent that liquidity issues coupled with higher risk-free rates and concerns of a Main Street recession have caused recent weakness in the energy equity and commodity markets. Despite these near-term issues, our forward view is that global crude oil markets is structurally undersupplied with short-cycle energy investment in crude oil production, particularly in the Permian Basin, at less risk of recessionary impacts than in previous cycles. Moreover, we believe energy markets are currently more at risk of a supply crisis than a demand-side downturn. We see clear evidence of that from the shape of the forward WTI crude curve, which is currently backward-dated in an unprecedented manner. It is important to acknowledge this given the shape of the WTI crude curve today differs materially from that of periods of prior weakness in the global economy. Consequently, our confidence in a sustained crude oil upcycle remains high, and we are planning our business accordingly, as are the largest and most sophisticated producers in our area, many of which ProPetro currently serves. In the North American pressure pumping market, we see continued evidence of an effectively sold-out market. This is most obvious in the recent trajectory of spot pricing for vintage Tier 2 equipment, where we see robust inquiries for future deployments. Moreover, we see bifurcation in demand for pressure pumping services, where our ability to reduce risk and bring forward the present value of high-priced oil production in a predictable manner is priced at a premium. Because of these variables and others, our forward view of pricing for our services and for the oilfield services sector remains positive. Now moving on to the second quarter highlights. I'm proud to report that our team achieved the highest level of fleet utilization for a quarter since the pandemic. Equally important, we did this without marketing any additional capacity. Our returns-focused strategy has revived intentionality around internal optimization as we move forward in the cycle. We'll continue to challenge our team in taking a holistic and inward approach to do more with less. I'd like to thank our team and employees for their focus and efforts around optimization and striving to improve our business every day. In the second quarter, our team continued to take delivery of more Tier 4 DGB or dual fuel units and successfully converted a third Tier 2 conventional fleet into a Tier 4 dual fuel fleet at the end of the quarter. We expect this transition to develop further over the next couple of quarters with four to five fleets expected to be in operation by the end of this year. Including the additional units announced in our earnings release yesterday, we expect to have capacity of at least six Tier IV DGB fleets early in 2023. Our ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and lower fuel costs with this technology is proving to be valuable to our customers and shareholders alike. We're also delighted to report that mid-cycle return levels were achieved in the quarter on a minor amount of repositioning and repricing. The current operating environment, coupled with continued capital discipline in our industry, gives our team confidence in the sustainability of pricing that supports returns above reasonable investment hurdle rates. This is a great time to be in our industry, and we look forward to being able to support our customers in a mutually beneficial manner. Lastly, I want to comment that the demand for electric solutions from efficient frac providers is gaining momentum, and ProPetro plans to play a significant role in the electric future of the Permian Basin. We have assessed multiple electric frac offerings with plans to deploy an electric solution in 2023, therefore putting our team and our company in a position to participate directly in the electrification and industrialization of the Permian Basin oil field. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to David to discuss our second quarter financial performance and capital resources. David.
spk06: Thank you, Sam, and good morning, everyone. During the second quarter, we generated $315 million of revenue, an 11.5% increase from the $283 million of revenue generated in the first quarter. The increase is largely attributable to additional net pricing gains, increased fleet utilization, and our team's ability to consistently outperform for our customers. We also had our highest revenue month in July since February of 2020, with more pricing improvements expected in this quarter and going forward. Our effective fleet utilization for the second quarter was above our prior guidance of 13.5 to 14.5 fleets, coming in at 14.8 fleets, which increased 8% from the 13.7 fleets utilized during the prior quarter. Our guidance for second-half effective fleet utilization is a range of 14 to 15 fleets. As Sam mentioned, we believe our capital discipline approach continues to pay off. We have achieved healthy sequential top-line and bottom-line growth for the past two quarters without deploying any additional fleets. This disciplined foundation that we've currently instilled at our company will propel the ProPetro team forward as our asset base shifts to a higher percentage of of ESG-friendly equipment by the end of this year and again in 2023. Cost of services excluding depreciation and amortization for the first quarter was $219 million versus $197 million in the first quarter, with the increase driven by higher activity levels and inflationary impacts, including labor and material costs. Second quarter general and administrative expense was $25 million compared to $32 million in the first quarter. Adjusted G&A was $20 million and excludes $5 million relating to non-recurring and non-cash items. Depreciation was $31 million for the second quarter. The company posted a net loss of $33 million or $0.32 loss per diluted share compared to our first quarter net income of $12 million, or $0.11 of income per deleted share. The net loss recorded in the second quarter of 2022 was primarily driven by the non-recurring and non-cash impairment expense of $57 million in connection with the evaluation of our DuraSTEM equipment as part of our quarterly financial review process. While we determined an economic impairment of the equipment was appropriate, The equipment remains on our books with residual value of approximately $11 million, and at the appropriate time, we may consider further evaluation. Operating income, excluding the impairment, increased 200 percent to $17 million. Margins expanded again in the second quarter, with adjusted EBITDA coming in at $76 million, or just over 24 percent of revenues for the first quarter. representing over 900 basis point increase from the fourth quarter of 2019. Adjusted EBITDA increased 13 percent sequentially compared to 67 million for the first quarter. The sequential increase was primarily attributable to additional pricing gains, increased activity, and continued fleet repositioning, while also being partially offset by rising cost inflation and other supply chain issues. Our steady focus on achieving full-cycle cash-on-cash returns across our operating fleet paired with additional operating leverage in the form of a 15th active fleet in the fourth quarter of this year gives us confidence to guide to a full-year 2022 EBITDA expectation of at least $300 million, an over 100% increase from last year. During the quarter, we incurred $89 million of capital expenditures. Of that amount, $36 million was related to Tier IV dual-fuel upgrades, with the remaining balance predominantly related to maintenance CapEx. Actual cash used in investing activities, as shown on the statement of cash flows for capital expenditures in the second quarter, was $78 million, with positive cash flow of approximately $1 million. This figure differs from our incurred CapEx number due to differences in timing of receipts and disbursements. Based on projected activity levels and our plan to purchase additional Tier 4 DGB units, our outlook for full-year CapEx spending has changed with new guidance ranging between $300 million and $350 million. Given robust industry fundamentals and our desire to transition our fleet to more gas-burning and electric offerings, which command higher relative pricing, we are confident in our capital allocation strategy. Accordingly, on the backdrop of completing our 2022 equipment reinvestment cycle, capital expenditures in 2023 are expected to come in meaningfully lower than 2022, setting the company up for strong free cash flow next year. As of June 30, 2022, total cash was $70 million, and the company remained debt-free. Total liquidity at the end of the second quarter of 2022 was $185 million, including cash, and $160 million of available capacity under the company's asset-based credit facility. Despite our aggressive reinvestment this year, our cash position and total liquidity have remained strong, which in turn sets a strong foundation for us to execute on our strategy moving forward. On that note, and as we have previously stated, we will not waver from our commitment to direct capital in support of transitioning our fleet to lower emissions and natural gas burning alternatives that not only further our ESG efforts and the goals of our customers, but also generate improved profitability. And with that, I'll turn the call back to you, Sam.
spk04: Thanks, David. We're very excited about the future of our company. The purchase of the additional Tier 4 DGB units announced yesterday reinforces our commitment to meet our customers' urgent desire for gas-burning engines that can lower their completions cost and lower their emissions. Accordingly, we are seeing higher demand and higher pricing for this equipment today and in the quarters to come. This should provide ProPetro with an early catalyst in achieving a healthy cash-on-cash return for these investments. We did the same thing last year around this time and our investment has paid off handsomely with significant margin expansion earlier this year and continue. Market conditions today are even better than they were then. Given our view on the state of the global energy industry and the associated severe undersupply of crude oil, we at ProPetro are convinced that we are in the early stages of a sustained multi-year long cycle. For that reason, Repetro is committed to playing a critical role in the next phases of industrializing our energy through initiatives like electrification of the region. Our conversations with our customers suggest that demand for this equipment is high and sustainable. We're expeditiously working to meet that demand and expect to provide a reliable electric solution for our customers in 2023. Also, it is important to acknowledge that the equipment discussed today will be deployed under our existing margin over market share strategy. While it's too early to project our total fleet count for 2023, we will make certain that we are striving to achieve proper cash-on-cash returns for our entire deployed portfolio of assets. Lastly, I'd like to mention how proud we are here at ProPetro to be a vital part of an energy value chain in the Permian Basin that is one of the best sources of reliable energy in the world. We believe that the oil and natural gas produced in this region and across the United States will be fundamental to producing products and powering all other industries here at home and across the globe for decades to come. We, along with our peers and customers across the oil and gas value chain, will continue to innovate and improve as we continue to provide the most reliable and secure energy for the foreseeable future. Finally, I'd like to thank my ProPetro teammates once again for another quarter of reducing risk and creating value for our customers and other stakeholders through the safe, reliable, and predictable operational performance. We'd now like to open it up for Q&A.
spk02: We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from John Daniel with Simmons. Please go ahead.
spk09: Hey, guys. Thank you for putting me on. Sam, you know, you guys, you'll have the six DGB fleets and at least one electric, but you work for some really good customers who I assume are seeing the value of the fuel-efficient fleet. So it does beg the question, like, what's the optimal – fleet mix at ProPetro in terms of DGB, electric, and legacy? If you could just opine on that, and the timing, too.
spk04: Sure. That's a fantastic question, John. I think the answer is slightly different for what we think the right mix is short-term and what we think the right mix is long-term. And on the short-term basis, we feel, given these most recent orders we've placed on the dual fuel side and what we're working on on the electric side, we feel really good about our portfolio going into next year. I think this most recent order we placed kind of finishes off the mix of equipment that we think is optimal. I can't say that without mentioning what's going on in the Tier 2 diesel-powered space. Given the market's effectively fully utilized, and I think you'll find many of our competitors that agree. The pull on conventional diesel equipment is also very hard, you know, if not very differentiated from some of these next-gen solutions. So we feel really good about where we're positioned there. Just a brief comment on the long-term, John. You know, I don't know what the right time frame is. Is it five years or ten years? But there's going to be a lot more natural gas burned through frac equipment as we go into the medium and long term. And we're positioning ProPetro today to be, you know, a very strong participant in that natural gas future of frac equipment.
spk09: Just one more for me, and I'll turn it over for Adam. But on the Durastem, is there another application – where the technology might work, you know, vertical frack or pump down, just any color on what a potential use of the asset could be.
spk08: Yeah, John, I would say right now, you know, no, we're not really focused on that either. As we've mentioned in the past, we just wanted to, you know, focus on, you know, getting our margins back on the tier two and then, you know, converting our fleet going into the future to this gas burning equipment. But, for the time now, I would say.
spk09: Fair enough.
spk08: Just curious.
spk09: Thanks, guys.
spk02: The next question comes from Scott Gruber with Citigroup. Please go ahead.
spk01: Yes, good morning. I wanted to ask somewhat of a follow-on question to John's question. Fleet renewal is an ongoing dynamic. You laid out where you'll be at at year end and into next year. But Sam, how do we think about fleet renewal over the long run? You know, if rates stay healthy, you know, do you go out and, you know, maybe order two EFRAC fleets a year, or maybe it's one and a few DGB based on customer preference and gas availability, or maybe it's a dollar amount like you're willing to commit. $100 million to fleet renewal every year. How would you frame up the kind of multi-year fleet renewal program for you guys?
spk04: Scott, great question. This is Sam. I think as we think about that today, and this has been pretty topical here within our team in terms of trying to figure out the most appropriate long-term capital allocation, but today it's based mostly on specific customer conversations and So we're seeing, as it pertains to gas-burning equipment, both dual-fuel and electric, we're seeing a very high willingness from the sophisticated customers, EMPs in the Permian Basin, to contract this gas-burning equipment. So right now, most of those conversations are led by that customer willingness to commit more commercially around that. Long term, as more gas-burning equipment comes into the system, there might be a more specified year-over-year allocation to capital allocation to converting the fleet.
spk01: Gotcha. It sounds like as long as the contracts are in place, you would place the order for additional equipment if it meets your payback or return hurdle? Is that the way to think about it at this juncture?
spk06: Yes, Scott, this is David. I think the way we look at it is, you know, we're wanting to facilitate the industrialization of this business, and we think that lower cost, lower operating cost solutions are really going to be part of that. So I think that, you know, whether or not we get contracts and is really secondary. I think our primary pursuit is ensuring that we're putting in place a model that's sustainable going forward and that enhances margins over the long term. And I think when you think about ProPetro, we've done that in a very disciplined way. We're utilizing the resources that we have and not going beyond that. And I think we'll continue to do that. Moving forward, the pace will be dependent on market conditions, on customers, and a variety of different things. But over the long term, as Sam mentioned, we believe these technologies are really the solution long term.
spk01: Gotcha. If I could squeeze one more in just kind of at the other end of the spectrum. Sam, you mentioned strong pull for Tier 2. How many idle Tier 2 fleets? do you have on the sidelines? And, you know, we saw one of your competitors reactivate some. Any opportunity for ProPetro to reactivate and get some nice paybacks on that reactivation spend?
spk04: It really depends, Scott. And anything we have sidelined is it, you know, requires varying investments to get it back off the fence. I think in our scripture remarks, we mentioned the 15th Fleet. Putting a 15th fleet into the system this year, we've been operating 14, right around 14 fleets since the beginning of the year. That'll be one of those fleets that will be somewhat created by, you know, the additional Tier 4 DGB program that we continue to execute on. So at the minimum, we think we will get a 15th into the system at the end of this year, and I think we'll see what the market gives us. going into next year, but with what we know today, we're looking at 15 going into next year.
spk01: Got it. Appreciate the call.
spk02: Thanks, Sam. The next question comes from Arun Jayaram with JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
spk10: Good morning. Sam, you know, one of the trends that we saw from public ENPs, call it, you know, starting in the 2014 timeframe was the fact that they were de-bundling their service offering. And so if you're a vertically integrated FRAC supplier during that time, you're kind of forced to discount, you know, some of your ancillary services to compete. And obviously, I think that serves, you know, pro-petro well as you just essentially were a pure play on FRAC. But it feels like the market is changing a little bit, maybe given the rising role of privates. And we are starting to see some margin benefits accrue to, at least in this cycle, to more integrated FRAC service providers. So I wanted to get your thoughts on where your head's at and potentially for ProPetra to expand its service offering just beyond pure FRAC sand and things. And so what's your thoughts on that? What are you thinking about from an R&D perspective?
spk04: Yeah, good question, Arun. And I think you've described the circumstances of the past and the present fairly accurately. We were very competitive against some of our bundled competitors and peers back in prior cycles because of exactly what you described. We have really, really strong convictions about the length of the cycle that we're in right now. And as we look through that lens, I think it's forcing our team to evaluate other strategic opportunities a little bit differently than we have in the past. And I personally look at that in kind of two different ways. You can integrate vertically or you can integrate horizontally. And when I say horizontally, I'm talking about different services that are out on the well site with, say, our FRAC services right now. I guess my short is that there's probably more to look at there for a company like ProPetro than there has been in the past. That said, there's a lot to choose from in the Permian Basin. This is, from a services standpoint, the most well-equipped resource play in North America by a long shot. So I think if you're talking about bundling services, say, in South Texas and East Texas or somewhere like the Bakken, it might look a little differently than bundling services in the Permian Basin. So we have to kind of account for that as well.
spk10: Great. And just my follow-up, maybe a difficult question to answer, but I wanted to get an update on kind of where we stand with the negotiations with Pioneer. You know, they had a nice slide yesterday. highlighting some of the efficiency gains that they're citing. If you go to slide 13 in there, a deck from last night. So it seems like you guys are executing really well for them in the field. But where do we stand with that? And are some of the investments that we're seeing in next generation technology with Pioneer in mind as a key customer as you move into E-Fleets and a higher mix of Tier 4 equipment?
spk04: Sure. Yeah, I usually, when talking to investors or analysts, Arun, have to remind them of the historical context of what Pioneer and ProPetro have achieved together. But you've done it pretty efficiently for me by pointing towards how Pioneer presents their own operating efficiencies that we've played a large part in. And we're really proud of that. We're proud of what the Pioneer and ProPetro relationship is. has done over the past few years in terms of creating value in a very mutual way. We're talking to Pioneer almost on a daily basis as we have for the last few years, and we'll continue to do that as we plan going into next year. That said, I personally and I think our leadership team is highly interested in ensuring that we're putting our equipment and our people in the greatest opportunities to succeed and create value. We think that Pioneer will be We'll be definitely a part of that going into next year. But there's a lot of work going on in that arena right now to ensure that we're exposing our offering and our company to all the best value-creating opportunities in 2023 and beyond. Great. Thanks, Sam.
spk02: The next question comes from Walker Syed with ACB Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk00: Thank you, and good morning. Sam, there's a slide in your presentation deck where you guys give your pumping hour productivity. And if I remember correctly, I think last quarter it was around 71%, and now it's around 53%. And if I understand correctly, that would mean that there was a big dip in productivity in Q2. Am I understanding it right, or is there something that I'm missing?
spk06: I think when you look at it, and this is pretty consistent with the slide that Arun just referred to, pumping productivity has increased nearly 100 percent over the period that we show. So, I think that's what we're looking at. The numbers you might be looking at are annual versus quarterly, but When you look at it back at the period that we're reflecting, and again, this is also shown by Pioneer, pumping our productivity has increased pretty significantly and continues to.
spk00: Right. Now, for our own modeling purposes, because we actually use that in our models, was there a dip quarter over quarter then? Is that fair to assume?
spk06: No. No.
spk00: There wasn't. Okay. Fair enough. And then one of the questions, you know, you mentioned next year would be very strong free cash flow. How do you define strong? What would you be happy with in terms of the use of the word strong, whether you want to describe it as a percentage of revenue or EBITDA conversion or anything like that?
spk06: You know, I think in the neighborhood of 40% to 50% of EBITDA conversion, to me, represents strong, and when we look at EBITDA per fleet and the cadence that we're expecting next year, we could see that up 25% to 40%. So that's kind of how I would expect strong to play out.
spk00: Okay. Great. And then in terms of your total hydraulic horsepower, we've been using number of about 1.4 million hydraulic horsepower. So number one, is that the correct number? And number two, any of these upgrades that you're doing right now, is that bringing in any incremental horsepower? Or is it mostly oil replacement engines?
spk06: Okay, this is David. Let me answer that. One of the things you should know is prior to this quarter, we did include the durastim in the available horsepower that we had. We have since removed that. So, you know, we're down to 1.3 million of capacity, and the investments that we're talking about essentially are replacing investments that otherwise would have been in legacy equipment. Now, you know, I think Sam talked about The fleet cadence for next year, we do think that we'll be able to generate growth, but we haven't laid out our full investment plan for 2023 yet either.
spk00: Okay. That's great. And just one final question. Following the impairment charge, could you provide some guidance for DDNA for Q3? Okay.
spk06: Yeah, that number is going to be right around $32 million. Call it 30 to 34.
spk00: Okay, great. Thank you very much. Appreciate all together.
spk02: The next question comes from Steven Gingaro with CIFOL. Please go ahead.
spk05: Thanks, and good morning, gentlemen. So two things for me. The first just is you talked about July. I think you said record revenue quarter, record revenue month. And when we think about the puts and takes in sort of profitability per fleet, I'm just kind of curious if what are the headwinds versus pricing as we think about profitability per fleet? Because it feels like your guidance is solid but beatable. And I'm just trying to understand if there's anything that is sort of offsetting what appears to be continued price momentum as we get into the second half of the year.
spk06: Steve, this is David. You know, there are continuing headwinds that Sam and Adam and I have spoken about, inflationary pressures, I think that some of those are receding a little bit, but we're going to continue to face those. However, the demand for services and the tightness in supply of FRAC equipment is such that we believe that the pace of change on the pricing side is going to be greater than the inflationary pressures that we would have to absorb. So I think that we feel good about that.
spk04: Yeah, it's Steve and Sam. I'll just add to that. Over the last eight, ten months as we've tried to employ a more aggressive pricing strategy in our kind of what we call margin over market share approach, it's been kind of baffling as, you know, you might be working with one customer in particular to get their pricing in the right spot, and it takes you a month to do that, and in the meantime – something pops up in the supply chain that was very unpredictable, either from a delay or from a cost inflation standpoint or both. So I think we're trying to be kind of prudent, conservative, and trying to factor in some expectations that some of that will continue, as David said, hopefully to a lesser extent. But just trying to be realistic with ourselves around the headwinds and crosswinds that still exist and that may come, say, in the next six months to a year.
spk06: Yeah, Stephen, the last part of your question regarding conservatism, I think what you've seen out of ProPetro is we've typically provided pretty minimal guidance and tried to be very conservative around that. So we are coming out with a bit more guidance regarding EBITDA and our full year. So I think conservatism is something that we'd like to stick with.
spk05: No, that's fair. That's fair. I appreciate the commentary. And just as a follow-on, when you are – you may have mentioned a little bit in the prepared remarks. When you're looking at the Tier 4 DGBs and when you're thinking about the electric fleet, are you looking for strong commitments and or contracts beforehand? the build or are you pretty confident in the visibility you see that there's customer demand?
spk04: Stephen, Sam, it's a little bit of both, actually. We have a strong willingness for multiple customers to contract any gas burning equipment, whether it be electric or DGB. That said, as David mentioned earlier in an earlier question around our idea of trying to participate in industrialization, of the sector and of the Permian Basin, some of this next-generation equipment that burns more natural gas is just more cost-effective solution. So as we talk about capital allocation moving forward, we want to do our best to be allocating capital to the most relevant technologies and tools to do our job that brings the best returns profile. So we do believe that we will be securing contracts for many of these different gas-burning offerings. That said, we think it's going to be prudent for the top-tier pressure pumpers like ProPetro and its larger peers to be pulling equipment into the system that plays to that industrialization and is more efficient, cost-effective, and brings better emissions profiles.
spk05: Great. Now, that's very helpful, gentlemen. Thank you.
spk02: Again, if you have a question, please press star, then 1. The next question comes from Derek Podhazer with Barclays. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hey, good morning, guys. I wanted to go back and address the Pioneer contract and if it could be potentially limiting exposure to the rapidly rising pricing environment. Can you talk about your profitability outlook for 2023 when these contracts roll off at your end? How much pricing leverage could this allow you as you roll into spot market rates? Plus, you're high-grading the fleet with a Tier 4 DGB and EFRAC. Just a little more color around the potential profitability uplift would be helpful. Sure.
spk04: This is Sam again. I think our – Our addition of more dual fuel units, our commentary around E-fleets next year is really directed towards what we believe is happening in the broader market and maybe even more so directed towards what we think the medium and long-term circumstances are going to be in the North American pressure pumping market for really the years to come. We're extremely confident. about what the market is going to look like, really the back half of this year and going into next year and beyond that. And this is no news to most informed people listening to this call, but the structural undersupply of oil and gas globally we think is going to take many years, many years to fix. So as we look through that lens on a top-down basis, we want to give our company the best tools to work with going into that. You mentioned in your question something like exposure to spot market. Not that we don't do spot work here and there, but it is an extremely small portion of our work. So when you see our operating and financial performance It is a direct look into a very committed, dedicated model, and we look to keep it that way going into 2023 and beyond. We just think that's the best way to run one of these businesses and make it as predictable as possible. Will Pioneer be a part of that? Yes, yes, we believe they will. What will the right mix be of all of our customers? We're working hard, as I mentioned earlier today, to figure that out. One interesting thing that that has happened this year that's been different from many cycles past is that we're sitting here really from June through today is the bidding and tendering season for 2023. That usually happens in November. So it's four to six months accelerated. And that's a fantastic indicator we think of demand and how tight the market is. And we've had more inbounds from different operators than we've ever had, really, maybe in the history of at least my tenure here in the last 10 years at ProPetro. So we're taking a close look at every opportunity that we think plays towards that dedicated, efficient, predictable model that we at ProPetro like to put our equipment and our people into.
spk08: Okay. Yeah, Derek, this is Adam. The only thing I would add to that is, you know, as we look into going into next year, any contractor, regardless of customer, definitely has to compete with our opportunity cost. So, you know, we're looking really hard, as Sam mentioned, at that. We're looking at all our opportunities, especially in the tight market that we sit in today.
spk06: Yeah, Derek, this is David. Just to chime in on top of Sam and Adam's comments, which they've communicated well, I think you've actually characterized it quite well in your commentary from last night. I think that just like every other management team, we're going to be commercial. We owe it to our shareholders. We owe it to our employees. We're going to be looking to put our assets in the best place to generate the appropriate returns. Our business development team is very excited about that. We feel like we've got the best services in the basin, and we've proven that. And, you know, we're going to take advantage of that going into what we think is going to be a very tight market, latter half of this year and into 2023. That's great.
spk03: I appreciate all the color. Switching over to the CapEx outlook for 2023, sounds like growth capital is still up in the air, but maybe we can address maintenance CapEx. Still running at a very high level, almost double that of your peers. You're folding in a few more Tier 4 DGBs. You're bringing in a new electric practically. I'd imagine that's going to drive that number down. Is that how we should be thinking about it, that we can cut that back down to the $3 million to $4 million range that we're seeing from your peers? If you could just help bridge us from where you are today to what you could see next year as you continue to high-grade the fleet.
spk06: Yeah, I think you're right. This is something that I think is happening and may not really be recognized by the market. You know, we have been converting – assets, legacy assets into like-new equipment with new technology. What we announced today is an additional down payment on that, not only in our Tier 4 DGB, but electric. So, you know, I think what's happening at ProPetro is a recapitalization of the fleet where we're going to be providing very relevant assets to the marketplace along with the efficient and effective FRAC performance that we've delivered historically to top providers, top operators. So in terms of completion performance and, you know, our overall capital spend, I think it's going to be trending in a very favorable way getting into 2023 as we're able to take advantage of those investments that we've made this year and prior to that.
spk04: I'll just add on top of that. I think it's going to be very important for ProPetro as well as our entire sector in the pressure pumping space to fix this problem and convert as much EBITDA into cash as possible. We have very intense internal efforts to do that this year and going into next year. which we think will bear fruit on something like the maintenance CapEx line item. We also believe that we're in the early innings of what I continue to call the industrialization of our business and our sector to migrate to technologies and tools that are just more efficient, more effective from a cost and equipment life standpoint. So we're really excited to be playing a part in that, and we'll look to continue to do so. because really there hasn't been significant innovation or change in pressure pumping equipment maybe the last 30 years. So it will take us a while as a sector to get the equipment offering right where we can do something like minimize maintenance capex significantly and make the investment rationale much more competitive and compelling.
spk03: That's great. If I can squeeze one more, and I want to ask about your new EFRAC offering, if you could. How is it different than Durastim? Can you give us maybe some text or specs about what it looks like? And then, secondly, on the power generation side, I know you sold your previous turbines, but those are not necessarily oil field ready. Will you be considering power generation ownership, or will you be using the third-party powers of service as you start to go into the EFRAC space starting next year?
spk04: Sure. I guess on your first question around the eFRAC offering, I guess I would say stay tuned there. We're working on some things that we'll hopefully be able to tell you more about soon. On the power side, it's really, I think what we've learned is that it's very customer and geographic dependent. So our strategy currently on the eFRAC power side is to remain flexible. study all of the options out there and work with our customer to make sure that we have the best purpose fit option. So it could be a little bit of a couple different things for us. Got it. Good, Collar. Appreciate it, guys. Thank you. Thanks, Derek.
spk02: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Sam Sledge, Chief Executive Officer, for any closing remarks.
spk04: Thanks, Andrew, and thanks, everyone, for joining us on today's call. As I mentioned earlier, we're very proud to play a part in an innovative energy industry where oil and gas remain critical to our everyday lives across the globe. We enjoyed talking with you today, and we hope to talk to you again soon. Please join us on our next quarterly earnings call. Have a great day.
spk02: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer