Republic Services, Inc.

Good afternoon and welcome to the Republic Services Third Quarter 2024 Investor Conference Call. Republic Services is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RSG. All participants in today's call will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your touchstone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Aaron Evans, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

I would like to welcome everyone to Republic Services Third Quarter 2024 Conference Call. John Van Der Aark, our CEO, and Brian Delgatio, our CFO, are on the call today to discuss our performance. I would like to take a moment to remind everyone that some information we discuss on today's call contains forward-looking statements, including forward-looking financial information which involve risks and uncertainties and may be materially different from actual results. Our SEC filings discuss factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. The material that we discussed today is time-sensitive. If in the future you listen to a rebroadcast or recording of this conference call, you should be sensitive to the date of the original call, which is October 29th, 2024. Please note that this call is property of Republic Services, Inc. Any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of this call in any form without the express written consent of Republic Services is strictly prohibited. Our SEC filings are earnings press release, which includes gap reconciliation tables and a discussion of business activities, along with the recording of this call are available on Republic's website at republicservices.com. I want to remind you that Republic's management team routinely participates in investor conferences. When events are scheduled, the dates, times, and presentations are posted on our website. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to John.

Thanks, Aaron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. We delivered strong third-quarter results by effectively executing our strategy that supports profitable growth and value creation. The Republic Services team continues to deliver world-class service and innovative solutions to meet the needs of our customers. During the quarter, we achieved revenue growth of 7%, generated adjusted EBITDA growth of 14%, expanded adjusted EBITDA margin by 210 basis points, reported adjusting earnings per share of $1.81, and produced $1.74 billion of adjusted free cash flow on a -to-date basis. Through our differentiated capabilities, customer zeal, digital, and sustainability, we continue to be well-positioned to capture new opportunities and create long-term value for our stakeholders. Regarding customer zeal, our focus on delivering world-class essential services continues to support organic growth and enhance customer loyalty. Our customer retention rate remains strong at more than 94%. Third-quarter organic revenue growth was driven by strong pricing across the business. Average yield on total revenue was 4.6%, and average yield on related revenue was 5.5%. This level of pricing continued to exceed our cost inflation and helped drive 210 basis points of EBITDA margin expansion. Organic volume on total revenue declined 1.2%. Volume losses were heavily concentrated to the cyclical portions of our business, including special waste and construction activity. Turning to our expanding digital capabilities, we continue to advance the implementation of digital tools to improve the experience for both customers and employees. Deployment of M-POWER, our new fleet and equipment management system, is underway. M-POWER is designed to increase maintenance technician productivity and

enhance

warranty recovery. Deployment of the new system is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2025. We estimate M-POWER will deliver 20 million annual cost savings once fully implemented. We continue to benefit from innovative technology on our recycling and waste collection routes. Our platform utilizes cameras to identify overfilled containers and recycling contamination. This technology generated more than $60 million in incremental revenue in the first year of operation. Moving on to sustainability. We believe that our sustainability innovation investments in plastic circularity and renewable natural gas position us to continue, grow, and create long-term value creation. Development of our polymer centers and blue polymers joint venture facilities continues to move forward. Las Vegas Polymer Center production volumes continue to increase throughout the quarter. Construction is progressing on our Indianapolis Polymer Center with initial equipment commissioning underway. This operation will be co-located with a blue polymers production facility. We expect construction on this facility to be complete by the end of this year with earnings contribution in the second half of 2025. We recently broke ground on a blue polymers production facility in Buckeye, Arizona. This facility will complement the Las Vegas Polymer Center. We expect the completion of this facility in late 2025. We continue to bring decarbonization solutions to the market that will unlock value for all of our stakeholders, including the communities we serve. The renewable natural gas projects we're developing with our partners continue to advance. Two projects came online during the third quarter, bringing the total completed this year to four projects. We expect four additional R&G projects to be completed during the fourth quarter. We continue to advance our commitment to fleet electrification. We currently have 28 electric collection vehicles in operation and expect to have more than 50 EVs in our fleet by the end of the year. We have 18 facilities with commercial scale EV charging infrastructure. As part of our approach to sustainability, we are committed to being an employer of choice in the markets we serve. Our third quarter employee turnover rate improved more than 100 basis points compared to the prior year, and we are proud to be certified as a great place to work for the eighth consecutive year. With respect to capital allocation, year to date, we have invested $104 million in strategic acquisitions. Our acquisition pipeline remains supportive of continued activity in both recycling and waste and environmental solutions. We currently have more than $200 million of transactions that are expected to close by the end of the year. Year to date, we returned $834 million to shareholders, which includes $330 million of share repurchases. I'll now turn the call over to Brian, who'll provide details on the quarter. Thanks, John. Core price on total revenue was 6.2%. Core price on related revenue was 7.4%, which included open market pricing of .1% and restricted pricing of 4.8%. The components of core price on related revenue included small container of 10.3%, large container of 6.9%, and residential of 7.2%. Average yield on total revenue was 4.6%, and average yield on related revenue was 5.5%. As expected, average yields stepped down sequentially as we began to anniversary the impact of new fees implemented last year. The fees relate to overfilled containers and recycling contamination and were enabled by our digital platform. Third quarter volume on total revenue decreased 1.2%, and volume on related revenue decreased 1.5%. Volume results included a decrease in large container of 3.6%, primarily due to continued softness in construction-related activity, and a decrease in residential of 2.9%, primarily due to municipal contracts lost in 2023 that anniversary in the fourth quarter of this year. During the quarter, small container volume decreased 40 basis points, while landfill MSW increased 30 basis points. Moving on to recycling. Commodity prices were $177 per ton during the third quarter. This compared to $112 per ton in the prior year. Recycling processing and commodity sales increased revenue by 70 basis points during the quarter. Commodity prices are currently $160 per ton, reflecting a recent decline in the price for recovered cardboard, or OCC. Total company adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 210 basis points to 32%. Margin performance during the quarter included margin expansion in the underlying business of 120 basis points, a 40 basis point increase from net fuel, a 30 basis point increase from recycled commodity prices, and a 50 basis point benefit from an insurance recovery related to a prior year claim. This was partially upset by a 30 basis point decrease from acquisitions completed in the prior year. Now turning to our environmental solutions business. Third quarter environmental solutions revenue increased $60 million compared to the prior year, driven by the rollover contribution from prior year acquisitions. Adjusted EBITDA margin in the environmental solutions business expanded 290 basis points to .5% in the third quarter. Environmental solutions EBITDA margin was .6% in the prior year. Environmental solutions margin included a positive 110 basis points from an adjustment to an allowance for bad debts established in a prior year.

Excluding

this benefit, environmental solutions margin would have been 24.4%. Year to date adjusted free cash flow was $1.74 billion. Decrease from the prior year is primarily due to the timing of capital expenditures. Year to date net capital expenditures of $1.19 billion represents an increase of $256 million or 27% compared to the prior year. Capital spending is more rattleable in 2024, whereas 2023 was heavily weighted to the fourth quarter. Prior year capital expenditures were impacted by vendor related delays in truck and equipment deliveries. Total debt was $12.6 billion and total liquidity was $2.6 billion. Our leverage ratio at the end of the quarter was approximately 2.6 times. With respect to taxes, our combined tax rate and impact from equity investments in renewable energy resulted in an equivalent tax impact of .6% during the quarter. This favorable tax rate driven primarily by the timing of equity investments in renewable energy contributed nine cents of EPS benefit during the quarter. I will now turn the call back over to John. Thanks, Brian. With respect to 2024, we believe we are trending toward the low end of our full year revenue guidance due to continued softness and cyclical volumes. That said, we expect to more than overcome this revenue headwind and achieve the high end of our full year adjusted EBITDA guidance. As a result, we expect EBITDA margin to outperform our expectations. Looking forward to 2025, we expect continued growth across the business supported by pricing ahead of underlying costs, cross-selling our complete set of products and services, and capitalizing on value creating acquisition opportunities. We also expect financial contribution from the investments made in sustainability innovation, including plastic circularity and renewable natural gas projects. We believe that the fundamentals of our business remain strong and supportive of continued growth in revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow, along with margin expansion in the underlying business. Over the long term, we believe our business can consistently deliver -single-digit revenue growth and grow EBITDA, EPS, and free cash flow faster than revenue. Our initial perspective on full year 2025 is consistent with this long-term growth algorithm. We plan to provide detailed 2025 guidance on our earnings call in February. With that, operator, I would like to open the call to questions.

Certainly. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on a touchtone phone. In the interest of time, we ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question today. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your request, you may do so by pressing star, then two. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. And our first question today comes from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi, good afternoon and good evening, everyone. Nice quarter. Brian, I'm wondering if you could just expand if there were any other one-time type items in the quarter, really impressive margin performance. And as I look at the fourth quarter guidance, it looks like you're guiding to margins to step down a couple of points more than normal seasonality, four Q versus three Q. I'm wondering, is that just conservatism or were there any other embedded tailwinds in the third quarter beyond that item that you spoke about, environmental services?

Yeah, thanks, Jerry. Yeah, taking a look at the third quarter, we called out the two big pieces that you would sit there and say were somewhat large and unusual for the quarter. So the insurance recovery, which had an impact of a positive 50 basis points to the quarter itself. We called out the bad debt as well. So it was 110 basis points to environmental solutions, about 10 basis point contribution to the enterprise taken as a whole. So 60 basis points, we would say ex-fat, the rest. I mean, I called out the pieces about what fuel

and

commodity prices were doing, but the underlying business, you saw the strength of that 120 bips.

Really impressive performance. And then, if I can shift gears and ask you to talk about on the polymer center rollout, can you just expand on the performance so far? How has the production ramp played out versus the initial plan and any updates to the timelines that you folks previously shared?

Sure, yeah, you're really happy in terms of the pricing we're getting. We're beating our full form on that. Certainly happy on the volume ramp in terms of how that equipment is building. We got off to a little later start than we would have liked for things all unrelated to the equipment. So permitting of the facility, getting electricity in, just getting all the things around the construction and the building envelope. You know, those things take time. Maybe we were a little aggressive in our timeline to begin with. Little delayed from the start there about the underlying assumptions, other than a delayed start, we still feel very confident in. And we, you know, India's hitting its marks, including the construction timeline there. So we feel really good about that. Listen, we think we're producing some of the cleanest flake in the world. And so that's what the market needs. It's good for circularity and certainly gonna be good for our shareholders as well.

I appreciate it, thank you.

Your next question today comes from Trevor Romeo with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks so much for taking the questions. I had one kind of on pricing, thinking about open markets versus restricted. I think the last several quarters, your open market core price has been, you know, 400 basis points or more above restricted. Is that kind of a good spread for us to still think about going forward, even if some of the inflation indices kind of continue to ramp down? And then in your shift away from CPI to more of those open markets and alternative indices, how much further room do you think you have to continue that shift at this point?

Yeah, when you take a look at the spread and we certainly talked about the fact that we thought we were in an elevated pricing environment, you know, in part due to the fact that there was the backdrop of elevated inflation. And we said that throughout this year, that would step down sequentially. And as we look forward into 2025, we would expect that to step down as well. Now, if you take a look back historically, open market pricing has tend to run above that which you can achieve on the restricted portion of the business. I would say right now that spread is probably a little bit more than what I would think about through the cycle. But all that said, we would expect the price and excess of our cost inflation consistent with what we've done over the last couple years and drive margin expansion in the business.

Got it, thank you. And then in terms of moving

away from the industry or, you know, rotating away from CPI, you know, we continue to make incremental progress on that. So a couple of big contracts moving to water sewer trash, and it's really some moving to fixed and above. And it's really the portfolio that we think positions us well across the cycle. And we're about 61% of those contracts that were historically pegged to headline CPI that have moved to something that we would consider favorable.

Got it, okay, thank you both, that's helpful. And then just quickly, wondering if we could talk about labor availability a bit. I think based on the BLS data, wage inflation in your industry is kind of mid single digits. Curious if that's still what you're seeing as well. And then just kind of as the overall labor market has maybe cooled a bit the past few months, have you seen any changes in labor availability?

Yeah, we mentioned turnover down 100 basis points year over year, we continue to trend in a really positive direction there. Labor cost inflation is four and a half ish percent. We're hanging out right there and getting that cake is largely baked because we start, we give our people a wage increase at the end of February. On that front, we expect that to step down marginally as we move into next year, based on where the current numbers are pointing. And then yes, labor bill is improving, there's still categories like technicians, which have been historically tough in this industry and they are getting tougher. That's why we vertically integrated into technical education and sort of our own tech institute and are growing our own and having a lot of success fielding entry-level techs out of that center.

Okay, thanks so much, appreciate the color.

And your next question today comes from Tony Kaplan with Morgan Stanley, please go ahead.

Thank you so much. I was hoping to ask for some additional color on the core price deceleration this quarter. I know you mentioned the anniversary of the new fees from last year, obviously that was expected. Anything else that you would point to in the quarter to call out that was notable in terms of the price environment and how we should be thinking about it as we progress through the year?

Yeah, if you take a look at the sequential step down from Q2 to Q4, also point out that the restricted portion of our business went from 5.6 to 4.9, so and that's just on the price increase perspective. So again, that's just reflective of the indices themselves and again, as expected, right? We knew that it would step down sequentially as I mentioned previously, so is our cost inflation. And as long as we can maintain that spread, that's how we drive margin expansion in the business.

Great, and I did want to ask about volume as well. I know you mentioned the special waste and the construction softness. Should we continue to expect those trends to continue in the upcoming quarters and anything else to call out on the volume side to be helpful, thanks.

Yeah, look, I think across the industry in the last 12 to 18 months, we're in a flat, a slightly negative demand environment from a unit standpoint. So probably hasn't been talked about or well understood on that front and it's the cyclical portions driving that. It's also true a little bit in the industrial side of the business to where enlarged container permanent, right? We're gaining customers, so we're gaining share there, but we're seeing activity that has continued to be relatively soft at individual customers on that front. On the construction side, whether this happens in three to six months or it happens in nine to 12 months, I'm optimistic on that side of the business for both commercial and residential. Interest rates coming down certainly helps with that. You've got both sides of the aisle talking about housing policy. We've underbuilt single family homes in the United States in the last 15 years, and so there's a lot of pent up demand on that front. And then we're starting to see some really interesting signs here on special waste and the industrial activity. And there's always a little bit of paralysis in an election year, and we're starting to see a pipeline that's been actually quite strong all year, but jobs haven't moved, and those jobs are starting to move here in the fourth quarter. So we're pretty optimistic for the remainder of the year and certainly in the 2025.

Super, thank you.

And your next question today comes from Kevin Chang with CIBC. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Good afternoon, and I'm gonna congrats on some good results. I think on the Q2 call you mentioned, just on M&A here, you had mentioned, I think about a $300 million pipeline that was advanced stages. It looks like you've booked about 200 million in Q3 here. Just wondering if we think of that incremental 100 million, is that something you think you can close by year end or is there an update to that pipeline as you kind of work through that pipeline?

Maybe broader backdrop, coming off three really great years of M&A, our commitment to M&A has certainly not dwindled and our outlook and our optimism going forward hasn't changed. There's always some ebb and flow. So we closed a couple of really big deals in Q4 last year. First half got off to a little bit of a slower start this year. If you put together what we've already done this year and what we expect to close in the fourth quarter, we're more like 300 million, where we gave you an indicator of closer to 500 million at the start of the year. A lot of those deals are starting to build here and so I expect us to have a really good first half next year on that front. So that gives you a sense of kind of the movement on that front, but our outlook and our enthusiasm for M&A remains strong and we expect that to be a meaningful contributor next year.

Now that's helpful. And just my second question here, I think about a month ago you replaced an order for about 100 EVs and I think you're targeting, I think half of new purchases in 2028 will be electric vehicles. I guess when we hear other commercial fleet operators, there seems to be a growing pushback on, I guess adopting this technology, whether the argument is that technology's not ready yet or infrastructure's not ready yet. Just as you think of your EV strategy in that 2028 timeline, I guess how you see the OEM, their ability to keep pace I guess with the targets you have I guess looking out kind of four years from now.

Yeah, definitely there'll be people that move faster and people that move slower. I mean we've learned from all kinds of experience here that EV isn't just a truck, it's a system. So you need to understand how to put in the infrastructure and get after that early. You need to understand the incentive environment on that front because that certainly accelerates adoption and shortens the payback period. And we've had teams working on that for three years. And the unlock is somebody building a truly studs up EV vehicle. No one's ever done that in our space before until Oshkosh with their McNeil vehicle. And that's a game changer because that allows you to get enough battery power on the vehicle that you can run a full day without sacrificing payload. And that was always the design parameter we had which is we're not gonna sacrifice productivity to do that. So we're thrilled with the product that we have running. I think there'll be other OEMs hopefully that get there. This is incentive, this is incentive people to move but there's certainly gonna be winners and losers in the short to medium term in terms of pace of adoption.

Thanks for taking my question.

And your next question today comes from Conar Gupta from Wisconsin capital, please go ahead.

Thanks and good afternoon everyone. Just wanted to maybe touch upon the housekeeping items first on the M&A side. Did you talk about the rollover effect in 2025 based on what you have closed today?

Oh, the rollover impact, yeah. So we would expect right now to see relatively negligible to 25 growth, it's 10 to 20 basis

points at this point. Okay and obviously there's probably upside if you're to out-close some of the acquisitions you're talking about in Q4 maybe then.

That is correct because that only includes that which is actually closed through the third quarter. There would be rollover impact of anything that closes in the fourth quarter.

Makes sense, thank you. And then my question is on the margin side. So if I look at the trend this year so far, the margins have sequentially expanded and you talk to some of the nuances on Q3 for sure, but then Q4 the margin kind of drops on an implied basis. Heading into 25, I'm just thinking like, what are some of the puts and takes you're thinking about margin as some of the circularity projects are ramping up maybe and then some of these headwinds might fade away next year. What's the best sort of proxy for thinking about margin expansion next year?

Yeah, we're certainly not giving 2025 guidance but an outlook that we've talked about in the prepared remarks and we mention often to investors is that we wanna go revenue mid-single digits and then grow EBITDA margin or EBITDA slightly faster than that which implies EBITDA margin expansion and free cash flow slightly faster than that. And EBITDA margin across the cycle, kind of think 30 to 50 basis points. Obviously this year is gonna be stronger than that but we would certainly go into next year kind of in that zip code in terms of our expectations of how we're gonna expand margin in the business.

Okay, that's great. Appreciate

it, Simon, thank you. And your next question today comes from David Mancy with Barrett, please go ahead.

Thank you, good afternoon everyone. It's less than three years since the ECO acquisition and I believe you said that the EBITDA and environmental solutions is about 24%. Going back to 2021, ECO standalone targets were like 17 and I think 40 million of synergies probably picks you up 300 or 400 basis points. Is the delta there, the remainder, is that just improved pricing or is there any kind of acquisition mix benefit in that improvement as well, any help you can give us there?

Yeah, no, all above, it's in every lever. So starting out with on the revenue side, it's customer mix. So we're going through verticals and understanding willingness to pay and where we have pricing power and what the more profitable verticals are and less profitable verticals. So you've seen some customer churn in that space this year as we've certainly pushed price because our services are valuable and found lots of willingness to pay and a few people that want to experience lower quality for a period of time upfront. And then just the pricing of, it's a top line pricing, very tactical account level pricing, kind of looking at every lever there, still more upside. Certainly they're going forward as we put in the systems and technology to give our team members better tools on that front. And then good cost management, cost discipline, better labor utilization. And as we get bigger, especially on the field services side of the business, you're able to deploy labor in different markets and therefore get better utilization rates on that labor. So really proud of the team and the work we've done there. We said we thought we could get to 25% as a midterm target. And there's some ebb and flow across quarters, of course, but we've made faster progress than I think we originally anticipated and have high aspirations for that business to grow both units and margin going forward.

I appreciate it. Thanks very much.

And your next question today comes from Toby Sommer with Chua Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks, following up on the environmental services in the U.S. ecology business. Is there any changes in your view on the long-term margins that you think you can approach over sort of many years in that business? And I'd love to get your perspective on the disposal market digesting incremental capacity. I think there's an incinerator coming online.

Yeah, about 25% free cash flow converges with the recycling and waste business across the cycle, just given the lower capital intensity of that business. Over time, the longer term, we don't see a constraint of why even a margin in that business couldn't be very similar to the recycling and waste business, just given the nature of the products, right? These are very technical, complicated waste streams. Limited number of outlets requires a lot of environmental compliance to handle those appropriately on that front. And so we think that's very valuable service and we're gonna continue to price for that over time. In terms of new incineration coming online, it's welcomed. The industry has been short supplied for a long period of time. And we don't see that as a challenge or constraint. We see that as an opportunity because there's pent up demand that that new capacity will be able to fulfill.

Thank you. In terms of the pace of M&A, it's been a little bit slower than I had anticipated year to date. I was wondering if you could speak to that, as well as the margin profile of the targets generally. I'm wondering to the extent supply chain fleet, wage growth, technology and other factors have actually sort of pressured the margins of the targets that you're looking at.

Yeah, I mentioned the ebb and flow pace of M&A. Again, we're gonna stay disciplined. I think, in fact, we just looked at this, we're eight to one. For every eight opportunities that we look at, eventually we close one of those because we're gonna be very disciplined. First, it's gonna have to meet our strategic hurdle. Are we the natural owners for this? Is it a fit? A, and then B, does it meet our financial stream? And so we're looking for cash on cash returns, double digit, post synergy on that. So we're gonna remain very disciplined. And again, there's ebb and flow, lots of conversation. Sometimes those things break quickly and sometimes they take a little longer, right? In that front and that's the period we're in right now. But again, our enthusiasm has not changed. In terms of the margin profile, it's less about what it has today and more about what it can become because oftentimes in these businesses, we're going to park the trucks, right? We're gonna recapitalize the fleet. We are going to layer in to our IT systems, right? Some of those drivers will come over, some won't because we layer it right into our density and so we can take routes out of the system and do the same amount of work and that's why we drive so much value in these deals.

Thank you very much.

And your next question today comes from Tyler Brown with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon guys. How are you doing, Tyler? Hey, I got a couple questions here. So first, I wanna kinda come back to the implied Q4 guide. But if I use the high end, it implies that Q4 is around 1.2 billion, which I think is down high single digits from Q3. Which is just worse than normal seasonality. Now I get that you've got the 60 basis points from bad debt and insurance, but it still feels a little conservative or am I missing something?

I would say that the opening remarks we talked about, low end of the revenue guide, high end of the even immersion guide. We're getting towards the end of the year. We're focusing our plans on 2025 on that front. We don't put a lot of time and attention and energy in getting decimal level accurate on updating the guide. We gave you the markers for how to do it really good about where we're gonna end up Q4 and end of 2025.

Okay, that's fair. And then just to be kinda clear on the implied volume guidance in Q4, is there any benefit from hurricane cleanup efforts in there?

There may be a little bit. Again, we don't plan on that, certainly. Sometimes you get actually quite a nice lift coming out of these. Sometimes you get a little less than you think about. Our primary focus is first taking care of our people. Some of them have been deeply impacted, especially in a lean, and so we're gonna get them back on their feet. And when they're back on their feet, they can get back to work on that front. And then on the back end, oftentimes we end up making some money that helps pay for that more. But if that comes, that's just icing on the cake.

Okay, and then I wanna kinda come at 25 a little bit different, because I think there's actually quite a bit going on next year. There's actually a number of moving pieces, discrete pieces, if I'm not mistaken, because I think you have polymer, blue polymer plants coming online. You mentioned that. I think your Rise platform still has some incremental benefits that you should get. I think you have maybe 40 million savings to go there. I think Empower comes on. That's gonna be modest benefit. You should have at least some benefit from RNG. So Brian, I don't know if you can, but can you kinda maybe bucket all that together? But how much do those incremental drivers help 25? Is it 50 million, 100 million? Just any broad buckets would be very helpful if you can.

Yeah, let's take those. Let's just talk about sustainability innovation, which would include

the

RNG portfolio, Polymer Center and blue polymers, right? So next year, if you think about what we're expecting from an incremental, so this would be 25 over 24, it's about $75 million of revenue and 30 to $35 million worth of EBITDA. So again, coming in at a nice, incremental accretive margin to the portfolio, primarily driven by the RNG side of that. As you mentioned, we do expect some benefits from Empower, but remember, we're gonna deploy that in a phased approach. And we just started the initial business units that are getting that system. So that will be deployed throughout the year. And as we exit 25, we would expect to be fully deployed. So we called out $20 million of benefit at run rate. So you can kinda think about half of that or so, being realized in 25 with the other half then in 26. And to your question on the Rise platform and some of the fees that we're generating, we talked about from a fee perspective that we've realized over $60 million of those fees, but that's already in the run rate. So we've had that throughout the year and we're starting to comp that in

Q3 of

this year. From a productivity perspective, you can think we've got about 25 million more to go. You can think about half of that coming in 25, half in 26.

Okay, okay, perfect. So there's some in 25 into 26. Now, the other thing is, will there be, based on what we know today, an alternative tax credit sunset headwind?

You're talking about the CNG tax credit? Correct, correct. Yeah, we are not assuming that in 25 and we just follow the law. And so, again, right now that's set to expire so that is not included in our projection for 25. And that's about, for us, that runs about $15 million.

Sorry, one five? One five. Yeah, okay, perfect. All right, thank you guys. So.

And your next question today comes from Brian Butler with Stiefel. Please go ahead.

Hi, afternoon, thanks for taking the question. Just first one, can we talk maybe about where internal inflation has been running as compared to the CPI headline? Kind of what was that trending in the third quarter and how is that looking the fourth quarter and then I guess 2025, if you have any color?

Yeah, good story, right? You're seeing that inflation come down. So I mentioned labor about four and a half percent and that's pretty good indication of the overall cost inflation. There's some puts and takes in our categories. Maintenance has been a real highlight in terms of that category. Certainly it's run hot the last couple of years and that's improved from lots of different reasons. One, we're getting truck delivery. So the putting out or parking older trucks and taking on new trucks with less maintenance intensity. And then also turnover continues to decline. We're doing more work internally versus outsourcing it to third parties and that's a cheaper labor rate. Parts inflation certainly modulated as well. So all those pieces are helping on that side and we expect that continue to improve modestly into 2025. So continued deceleration.

Okay, great. And then when you went through the buckets kind of on what rolls into 25 for sustainability, the e-power ride, how should we think about the capital spending that's attached to that versus what was spent in 2024?

Relatively consistent. If you think, cause remember when you think about what we're doing when we're investing in RNG, when we're making those investments, that's in a JV structure. So that comes through more like an acquisition than it does CapEx. But when you think about, you know, polymer center and when you think about what we're gonna do from an E-mean perspective, we would expect those to be on par what we did this year, slightly higher, but nothing of note to change the CapEx as a percent of revenue.

Okay, great. Thank you.

And your next question today comes from Noah K. with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks folks. I think we said last quarter, 32% EBITDA margins could be achievable over time and well, here you are. So well done. I wanna ask about environmental solutions. I think in the prepared remarks you mentioned that was largely due to acquisitions that there was revenue growth. Can you just tell us a little bit about the organic friends in the quarter, maybe how you see the pipeline for ES shaping up?

Yeah, there's certainly been growth. There's also been some turn, which I mentioned, right? And we are gonna continue to pass the bounds of customer willingness to pay. We believe you have to do that as a leader in the marketplace, so when the services are highly valued. And we also know that customers come back around. They experience with a different provider and with high quality service, where we're engaged with them from a safety standpoint, sustainability standpoint, digital standpoint, that has value. Ultimately, those customers oftentimes come back on that front. So a little flat, more flat this year from a volume standpoint than we would have hoped. The pricing obviously exceeded our expectations and went forced to choose. I'll take that trade off all day. Now, I pushed the team that we wanna grow both units and price and we'll have a plan to do that in 2025.

And to that point, you talked about maybe some faster pace of margin expansion, reasonable thing about for ES versus overall, you talked about the 30 bips for the overall business. Sort of like 100 bips for the right level on an annual basis to be thinking about the segment.

Yeah, I think we've talked about 80 to 100 basis points kind of across the cycle. And some years that'll go faster and some years maybe slower. But if you look at the trend, I think that's a radical pace where we can take margin.

Okay, very helpful. Yeah, I'll leave it there. Thanks very much.

And your next question today comes from Sabahat Khan with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Great, just to follow up on that last question there, just in terms of the discussions you're having with your customers as the absolute level of headline inflation is moderating, just their willingness to sort of give that spread over the cost base. And are you finding it easier, harder than it was maybe a year ago? And it's sort of the directional rate cuts and things like that helping at all, thanks.

I would say broadly, if we're in a world of two and a half, three, three and a half, 4% inflation, that's a pretty good spot for us to be. We've seen what really high inflation looks like and that was certainly sustainable or workable for a period of time. Over time, that's very unworkable because of what the Fed will do and they'll end up crashing the economy to bring that down. We've lived in a period of incredibly low inflation and that's really hard because we're gonna give our people a wage increase every year.

We know that

their real costs are gonna go up on that front. So living in, again, that kind of three, three and a half percent zone is a really good spot for us to be.

Great, and then just on the volume front, maybe we can just give some perspective on, I think as these rates get cut, I think you're indicating you want pricing and you have volume growth next year, ideally. Maybe just some perspective on what you're seeing on the economic activity, the cyclical units. And then secondly, where you are on the volume churn front, if there's any more of that still to come in 25,

thanks. Yeah, I think I mentioned in the past that from a churn standpoint, every time we do M&A, there's always gonna be some work that we're gonna churn out of the portfolio. There's gonna be some municipal contracts. We know that we are gonna upgrade or replace in terms of pricing and we know that there's likely some broker work that we don't treat those as customers. We treat people who generate recycling and waste as customers. So that's gonna get churned out of the portfolio. We're seeing some of that this year for sure on that front. And the cyclical volume, listen, construction's down. Our large container temp business is certainly down. You're over your 10% from a unit standpoint, quarter over quarter. And so that's just a reflection of what's happening, the underlying construction activity. And I think what the really good news is, is given again, this broader demand environment, which is when you put all the pieces together,

right,

something south of flat, right, you're seeing really good pricing behavior and conduct and performance. And I think if you take a look 20 years back, you just would not have seen that. You would have seen people chasing units to try to keep trucks utilized. And what we're doing and others apparently are parking vehicles and understanding that, right, your people need to have a wage increase every year and it's important to go out and price. And so I think you're seeing a market that's behaving rationally and that's really beneficial. And as we see, you know, again, really good growth indicators on the horizon, whether that's three months, six months, nine months, but we're pretty optimistic on that front, a little bit of volume will be a really good place to be. You know, and some of the contract losses as well, as John mentioned, right, you know, some of this is just comping out some losses that happened earlier in the year. So for example, residential, we were down .9% year over year in the third quarter. Most of that is gonna anniversary as we exit the year. So it's not that we're necessarily expecting any sort of robust growth in residential. It's just the absence of a headwind that we've been experiencing all year long.

Great, thanks very much for the call.

And your next question today comes from Fiza Alwi with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi, thank you. I wanted to go back to the 3Q versus 4Q margin trend. And, you know, it seems like I get the 60 basis points of potentially one-time benefit, but is it just taking a step back? Is it just commodity prices that are coming down in the fourth quarter that reflects the change in year over year margins, or was there something in the prior year comp to be aware of, or is there any other factor?

Yeah, I would say, look, as you look at last year, you know, from a prior year comp perspective, historically, you've seen margins step down from Q3 to Q4, and last year they were flat, right? They were equal to each other. So there's certainly a tougher comp, but as John mentioned earlier, we feel really good about our prospects and how we're gonna finish up this year, and we'll be able to sit there and tell you how we finish out the year, you know, in February.

Understood, and then just a housekeeping question for 25, if you can. First, just wanna confirm if there's any level of rollover acquisitions that we should be keeping in mind for 25, and then, like, anything below the line, whether it's interest expense, I know you have some notes that are coming up, or the tax rate, or any of those -the-line type of things that we should keep in mind.

Yeah, from a rollover perspective, as we said earlier, you know, about 10 to 20 basis points of rollover based on that, which is already closed. Obviously, that would increase for any deals that we close in the fourth quarter, right? So again, we can give you some of that flavor when we get back together in February. As far as some of the other components, I mean, if you can take a look at the maturities of what's coming due next year, they are at lower rates than current rates. So we would expect some increase in overall interest expense just due to rate on the fixed rate debt, but nothing overly significant.

Great, thank you.

Your next question today comes from Stephanie Moore with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon, thank you. Good afternoon. Maybe just to, good afternoon. To follow up to actually Tyler's question, I appreciate maybe the quantifying the benefit of some of your digital efforts and the RISE platform, but maybe you could remind us what is left in terms of kind of rolling out some of those systems and capabilities. I know this year is putting a lot of tablets in the cabs and making sure you're capturing some of the overcharge and surcharges. What's next as we think about 2025 as you phase out, I'm sorry, phase in the next batch of capabilities. Thank you.

Yeah, I mean, now that you've got the platform in place, really kind of ratcheting up what you do from a route sequencing in order to sit there and optimize those routes and then ultimately adherence, right, to make sure that the drivers are running the routes as designed. So again, we put this flavor out there before, is that a minute across our system is worth about $5 million annually. So it doesn't take a lot of seconds and minutes to add up to something meaningful and that's what we think that the next rev of our digital platform can yield. And I said more broadly over the last four or five years, you know, we've done a good job of just radically replacing and modernizing all of our systems without taking some big one-time capex event or creating any institutional risk. And so we've done it with our marketing and sales, we've done it with HR, we've done it with procurement, we've done it now with our assets, we've done it on the operating side of our business and, you know, we're working on underlying order of cash and there'll be another wave of benefits there as we think about still a lot of transactional work that we can automate on that front. So those will be opportunities that won't hit necessarily in 25, we'll get some of those, but really into 26 and 27. So it's a great store and then it makes the employee value proposition stronger and provides better customer service and we're gonna be able to operate the business more efficiently.

Got it. It makes a lot of sense. And then maybe switching gears, just to, on the recycling side of your business, you know, not the polymer centers and the like, so when you just think of your traditional MERS, maybe talk about any kind of retrofitting or automation investments or anything that you might have planned or you feel like you might be implemented here in, you know, 2025 or the coming years.

Yeah, we're doing that every year. Every year we're putting in new optical sorters and taking out manual work and getting more automation. The primary investment we make in our recycling centers is to produce a better product. Now, in order to do that, you put in new capital and you end up taking out some labor, but taking out jobs is never our goal. Our goal is to provide the, to create the best product we can for the marketplace, which drives more circularity and drives a higher price for product on that front. And so, and we also, then we do M&A, we pick up some new recycling centers. There'll be, you know, a couple over the next few years that we're gonna go studs up because of the markets where we need capacity on that front, but most of our investment is the, you know, continued upgrading of the existing 75 or 75.

Yep, absolutely. Well, thank you so much.

At this time, there appear to be no further questions. Mr. Vander Ark, I'll turn the call back over to you for closing remarks.

Thank you, Nick. I wanna thank the entire Republic Services team for their commitment to exceeding customer expectations and the continued growth and success of our company. Have a good evening and be safe.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the conference call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.