Republic Services, Inc.

Good afternoon and welcome to the Republic Services fourth quarter and full year 2025 investor conference call. Republic Services is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RSG. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, then 2. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Aaron Evans, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. I would like to welcome everyone to Republic Services' fourth quarter and full year 2025 conference call. John VanderArk, our CEO, and Brian DelGaccio, our CFO, are on the call today to discuss our performance. I'd like to remind everyone that some information discussed on today's call contains forward-looking statements, including forward-looking financial information, which involve risks and uncertainties and may be materially different from actual results. Our SEC filings discuss factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. The material that we discuss today is time sensitive. If, in the future, you listen to a rebroadcast or recording of this conference call, you should be sensitive to the date of the original call, which is February 17, 2026. Please note that this call is property of Republic Services, Inc. Any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of this call in any form without the express written consent of Republic Services is strictly prohibited. Our SEC filings... earnings press release, which includes gap reconciliation tables and a discussion of business activities, along with a recording of this call, are available on our website at republicservices.com. In addition, Republic's management team routinely participates in investor conferences. When events are scheduled, the dates, times, and presentations are posted on our investor website. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to John. Thanks, Aaron.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. The Republic team delivered another strong year of performance, reflecting the resilience of our business model and the power of our differentiating capabilities. We maintained high levels of customer loyalty by consistently delivering premium products and services while effectively managing costs across the business, all while navigating a dynamic macroeconomic backdrop. Our solid earnings growth and meaningful margin expansion reflect our strategy in action and the dedication of our team to create long-term value for our customers and shareholders. During 2025, we achieved revenue growth of 3.5%, generated adjusted EBITDA growth of nearly 7%, expanded adjusted EBITDA margin by 90 basis points, delivered adjusted earnings per share of $7.02, produced $2.43 billion of adjusted free cash flow, and increased adjusted free cash flow conversion by 200 basis points to 45.8%. We remain well positioned to secure new growth opportunities by delivering our differentiated capabilities, customer zeal, digital, and sustainability. With respect to customer zeal, our customer retention rate remains strong at 94%. Our net promoter score continued to improve throughout 2025. This reflects our team's commitment to delivering exceptional customer value. Fourth quarter organic revenue growth was driven by solid pricing across the business. Average yield on total revenue was 3.7%, and average yield on related revenue was 4.5%. Organic volume declined during the quarter, reducing total revenue by 1% and related revenue by 1.2%. Volume declines were concentrated to construction and manufacturing end markets, as well as a continued shedding of underperforming residential business. Organic revenue in the environmental solutions business decreased total revenue by 2% in the fourth quarter. More than half of this decrease in the environmental solutions business related to an emergency response job in 2024 that did not repeat. Turning to digital, we continue to make investments in new technologies and AI-enabled tools that strengthen our competitive position and create measurable value. These capabilities extend across our organization and are expected to unlock incremental growth, enhance profitability, and drive sustained operating leverage. For example, we are deploying advanced analytics to optimize pricing based on specific attributes and local market dynamics. Over time, we expect this will strengthen price retention and reduce customer churn. We're upgrading our RISE digital platform, beginning with our large container business. By applying AI and algorithmic-based routing, we see meaningful opportunities to improve safety, enhance service delivery, and increase route level productivity, benefits that translate directly into cost efficiency and a better customer experience. Additionally, our digital tools are helping us optimize nearly all 11 million customer calls we receive each year. In fact, in 2025 alone, we delivered more than 70 million proactive service notifications addressing our most common customer inquiries such as holiday service schedules and weather-related delays. Within sustainability, we made great progress during the year in the development of our Polymer Center Network and Blue Polymers joint venture facilities. In July, we commenced commercial production at our Indianapolis Polymer Center. This facility is co-located with a Blue Polymers production facility. Commercial production began in the Indianapolis Blue Polymers facility during the fourth quarter. We continue to advance renewable natural gas projects with our partners. Three projects came online during the fourth quarter. In total, we commenced operations at nine RNG projects in 2025. We expect four more energy projects to be in operations in 2026. We continue to execute against our industry-leading commitment to fleet electrification. We had more than 180 electric collection vehicles in operations, supported by 32 commercial-scale EV charging facilities at the end of 2025. We expect to add another 150 EV collection trucks to our fleet this year to support the continued growth of this differentiated service offering. As part of our commitment to sustainability, we strive to be the employer where the best people want to work. In 2025, our employee engagement score, which consistently exceeds national benchmarks, improved to 87, and our turnover rate was our best performance on record. Regarding capital allocation, in 2025, we invested $1.1 billion in value-creating acquisitions and returned $1.6 billion to shareholders including $854 million of share repurchases. Our results clearly demonstrate our ability to create sustainable long-term value, even while managing through a dynamic market environment. We expect to deliver another year of profitable growth in 2026. More specifically, we expect full range revenue in a range of $17.05 billion to $17.15 billion. Adjusted EBIT is expected to be in the range of $5.475 billion to $5.525 billion. We expect to deliver adjusted earnings per share in a range of $7.20 to $7.28. And we expect to generate adjusted free cash flow in a range of $2.52 billion to $2.56 billion. Our acquisition pipeline remains strong and supportive of continued activity in both recycling and waste and environmental solutions. We expect to invest approximately a billion dollars in value creating acquisitions in 2026. We are already off to a strong start this year with over $400 million of investment acquisitions to date. Our guidance includes the financial contributions from these acquisitions. At the midpoint, our outlook for 2026 represents revenue growth of 3.1%, adjusted EBITDA growth of 3.6%, adjusted earnings per share growth of 3.1%, and adjusted free cash flow growth of 4.4%. As we have highlighted previously, our 2025 results benefited from landfill volumes related to wildfire and hurricane cleanup efforts. Absent difficult prior year comparisons created by these non-recurring projects, the midpoint of our 2026 guidance would indicate nearly a 4% top line growth, more than 5% growth in adjusted EBITDA, 50 basis points of EBITDA margin expansion, approximately 6% growth in adjusted earnings per share, and 7% growth in adjusted free cash flow. This level of performance aligns with our long-term growth algorithm, even as we continue to operate in an uncertain macroeconomic backdrop. I will now turn the call over to Brian, who will provide additional details on the quarter and the year.

Thanks, John. Core price on total revenue was 5.8% in the fourth quarter. Core price on related revenue was 7.1%, which included open market pricing of 8.7% and restricted pricing of 4.6%. The components of core price on related revenue included small container of 8.8%, large container of 7.4%, and residential of 6.7%. Average yield on total revenue was 3.7%, and average yield on related revenue was 4.5%. In 2026, we expect average yield on related revenue in a range of 4% to 4.5%, which equates to average yield on total revenue in a range of 3.2% to 3.7%. Fourth quarter volume decreased total revenue by 1% and decreased related revenue by 1.2%. Volume results on related revenue included a decrease in large container of 3.8%, primarily related to continued softness in construction-related activity and manufacturing and markets, and a decrease in residential of 3% due to shedding underperforming contracts. In 2026, we expect organic volume will decrease total revenue by approximately 1%. Keep in mind that landfill volumes from wildfire and hurricane cleanup efforts in 2025 creates a 60 basis point headwind to organic volume growth in 2026. Moving on to recycling. Commodity prices were $112 per ton during the fourth quarter. This compared to $153 per ton in the prior year. Recycling processing and commodity sales were flat compared to the prior year. Increased volumes at our polymer centers and reopening a recycling center on the West Coast offset the revenue impact of lower recycled commodity prices. Full year 2025 commodity prices were $135 per ton. This compared to $164 per ton in the prior year. Current commodity prices are approximately $115 per ton, which is the baseline used in our 2026 guidance. Fourth quarter, total company adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 30 basis points to 31.3%. Margin performance during the quarter included margin expansion in the underlying business of 80 basis points, which was partially offset by a 10 basis point decrease from net fuel, a 20 basis point decrease from recycled commodity prices, and a 20 basis point decrease from acquisitions. Our full-year total company adjusted EBITDA margin was 32%, which represents margin expansion of 90 basis points compared to the prior year. This improvement was driven by margin expansion in the underlying business. The 30 basis point increase to margin from wildfire and hurricane landfill volumes was completely offset by the impact of net fuel, recycled commodity prices, and acquisitions. With respect to environmental solutions, Fourth quarter revenue decreased $60 million compared to the prior year. Approximately $50 million of this decrease related to an emergency response project in 2024 that did not repeat. Adjusted EBITDA margin in the environmental solutions business was 20.1% in the fourth quarter. This level of performance was relatively consistent with our third quarter results. Total company depreciation, amortization, and accretion was 11.6% of revenue in 2025, and is expected to be approximately 11.6% of revenue in 2026. Full year 2025 adjusted free cash flow was $2.43 billion, an increase of more than 11% compared to the prior year. This was driven by EBITDA growth in the business and cash tax benefits resulting from recently enacted federal tax law. Total debt at the end of the year was $13.7 billion, and total liquidity was $2 billion. Our leverage ratio at the end of the year was approximately 2.6 times. Based on current interest rates, we expect net interest expense in a range of $575 million to $585 million in 2026. With respect to taxes, our combined tax rate and impact from equity investments in renewable energy resulted in an equivalent tax impact of 16.2% during the fourth quarter and 21.9% for the full year. The favorable tax rate in the fourth quarter was driven by the timing of tax credits related to equity investments in renewable energy. We expect an equivalent tax impact of approximately 24% in 2026 made up of an adjusted effective tax rate of 19% and approximately $190 million of non-cash charges from equity investments in renewable energy. With that operator, I would like to open the call to questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your touchtone phone. In the interest of time, we ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question today. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your request, you may do so by pressing star 2. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. The first question is from Tyler Brown with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon, guys. Hey, John, appreciate the comments on the M&A pipeline, but I'm just curious if you can talk a little bit about what you purchased with the 400 year-to-date and then what types of assets are in the other 600. And then, Brian, I assume the 400 in acquisitions is in the guide, but the 600 is not. I'm assuming that's The way it will be. And then just, can you provide what the acquisition contribution will be in 26 implied in the guide? Sorry. I know that's a lot.

Yeah, no problem. Yeah. The typically don't comment on individual deals, but it was public. So we bought a company called hams on the west side of Kansas city. Um, great disposal infrastructure, great opportunity for us to use that as a basis for further growth. Um, so that was the anchor tenant of the 400. And of the 600, an additional that we had directionally was we don't know. Again, we know some of the things that are likely in there. We don't know exactly what's in there because we haven't closed any of that stuff. So we'll update you on future quarters, but feel really good about that mix. It's predominantly recycling and waste, but we've got a number of attractive ES opportunities that we're looking at as well and I'll let Del talk about the mechanics of the contribution.

Yeah, Tyler, you're correct. So we've included the contribution from that which is already closed, which includes the $400 million. And there were other deals besides just HAM that we closed. With respect to the contribution, so rollover together with those deals, it's adding 70 basis points to 2026 growth.

Okay, perfect. Perfect. And then, Brian, if we can talk a little bit about margins, because I think the margin guide is call it 32-2 based on the midpoint, which I think is 20 basis point up. But there's quite a bit going on. So can we talk about at the core level, because we have commodities, we've got the landfill comps, we've got M&A. And then I don't want to get really near-term focused, but can you help us shape Q1 and Q2? Because I surmise, again, there's a lot going on. The majority of the landfill comp will be earlier in the year. So will margins actually move backwards in the first half? But, again, sorry, I know there's a lot there.

Yeah, let me just start with the components because you're right. There are quite a few moving pieces. So 20 basis points at the midpoint there. Call it 60 to 70 basis points of that expansion in the underlying business. With what we've guided to from $115 per ton, commodity prices would be a 10 basis point drag on margin. Acquisitions, another 10 basis points of drag. And then to your point on those higher margin landfill volumes, that's a 30 basis point drag on margin. So add all that up, that's the 20 basis points at the midpoint, but quite strong when you look at the underlying business in that 60 to 70 basis point zip code. When you think about the timing, so what I would just say, and more of this is having to do with what happened in the prior year. So think, you know, slightly positive in Q1, Q2, and Q3 flat to slightly negative just because we're comping those landfill volumes during those two quarters, and then most of the margin expansion happening in the fourth quarter.

Okay. Excellent. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Absolutely. Absolutely.

The next question is from Jerry Revich with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi. Good afternoon, everybody. I'm wondering if we could just talk about the polymer center performance. So nice to hear about the projects being on budget. Can you, John, just please provide us an update on how you're thinking about future polymer projects, what's the demand curve look like, and overall performance as you folks ramp?

Yeah, we're happy with the progress on Las Vegas. Again, we talked about that having some learning curve in terms of the startup, and that's moving up the curve very nicely. Indianapolis learned from a lot of that benefit, and then Allentown Steel is up in the air in our third Palmer Center. There certainly could be a fourth Palmer Center over time. As you know right now, plastics is a pretty challenge broadly. What has been nice is the spread between the bail we're taking on the front end and the PET we're selling on the back end has – been really stable, in part because we're producing a very premium product that's meeting our customers' needs on that front. So we're going to see how that market evolves. I don't think we'll announce any fourth polymer center in the very near term. I think that is more likely than not over time, just testing again how the market evolves. There's some macro factors, obviously, with China and both Virgin and recycled PET that are putting downward pressure on pricing that I'm hoping those trends are arrested here in the next 12 to 18 months, and I think we'll see some upward pressure on plastics.

And, Jerry, to your question just on performance, when you think about next year, we're expecting about a $30 million revenue uplift from the polymer centers and with about $10 million of incremental EBITDA.

Super. Thank you. And can I ask separately on the R&G side, nice to hear about the project's Coming online, can you just provide an update on performance from a royalty standpoint and operating efficiency? We're hearing in the industry projects are generally having a harder time getting to the targeted profitability numbers. I'm wondering how your projects are tracking in that regard, both from royalty standpoint as well as equity income, if you don't mind sharing.

Yeah, there was certainly a delay, which kind of pushed everything a little bit to the right. But now, as you heard in our prepared remarks, nine projects coming online in 2025. We expect another four in 2026. So now that we're seeing those projects coming online, we're seeing the financial contribution that we would expect from those projects. So next year, again, just the way the timing works, when you think about incremental revenue and EBITDA, about $10 million each of both incremental revenue and EBITDA from those projects with that accelerating then as we move 27 and beyond towards the end of the decade.

Oh, it's good to hear that the profitability is as planned as you're ramping. Okay. Thank you.

The next question is from Noah K. with Oppenheimer and Company. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking the questions. I want to ask about the organic growth outlook broadly, both from the volume component and the yield component. I know apples to apples is always a little bit tricky in this space, but it does look like a relatively conservative initial outlook, just comparing to some of the peers. Is there anything that you would call out, you know, either on sort of the yield side or what you're seeing in the environment on volumes? We need to take a relatively more conservative tack.

Yeah, I'd say from a macro economy standpoint, I think the macro economy characterized as stable. Now, moving pieces underneath that, manufacturing, construction have been weaker, which is leading to, you know, we're into three years, approaching four years of negative demand and recycling and waste. So that's been a challenging volume environment. I think in the context that the pricing environment has been broadly fairly positive. Now there's spots where you see people around national accounts or some landfill maybe getting a little aggressive on volume, but on balance, I think the industry has performed well over an extended period of really challenging demand. And in terms of our own outlook, you know, we're going to be pretty conservative until we see some momentum and Now, there are some positive signs around special waste, and certainly in January, the west side of the country will outperform the east side. Some of that is weather. So we're cautiously optimistic in terms of the early signs, but in terms of a guide, we're going to wait until we get through the normal seasonality that we see into Q2 before we would take a more optimistic approach to the guidance. Great.

Yeah, I guess the follow up to that. And that makes sense. It's just 40 bits underlying volume decline, right in the midpoint when you back out the landfill volumes. Maybe just help us understand how much of that is kind of further controlled shedding in resi versus anything else. And just if you're seeing, in general, your commercial service increases, outpacing decreases.

Yeah, I mean, to your point, we do expect residential to be negative in each of the quarters and for the full year in 2026. Okay, so that is certainly, you know, a headwind when you think about that 40 bps that you talked about excluding the landfill volumes, whereas we do expect some better performance with respect to volume in the other lines of business. And so, you know, again, when you just take the average of those, that's where you get to that negative 40 basis points for the year. Now, remember, there is some timing things that you have to take into consideration. So because of rollover as well as the in-year impact, we would expect to start the year negative, right? So we're guiding to that negative 1% for the year. We would expect to be negative in Q1, a little bit more than that 1%. Same thing for the second and third quarter just because you're comping. those landfill volumes in Q2 and three, and then to be somewhat flattish by the time that we exit the year.

That's great, Collin. That plays finally into my last question around ES. We obviously had the tough comp here from the ER revenues in 4Q. I know we've got a little bit left, right, $15 million or so in 1Q, so that makes a tough comp. But just help us understand, what have you assumed for that business in terms of total growth in 26, and how would you see that shaping?

Yeah, so for the year, we're relatively flat. As far as growth, and to your point, some of that's starting negative in the first half of the year because of some of those tougher comps, and then growth in the second half of the year. And on balance, call it relatively flat on a full year basis.

And now, broad across both businesses, we're going to pursue volume for sure and pricing, but when forced to choose, we are going to take price. We need to get a return on the work that we do. And we're going to continue to put upward pressure on pricing in both of those businesses over time. And so some of the implication of that would, again, be in national accounts, be in residential, be in landfill. We're going to take that disciplined approach and, again, broadly happy with how we've performed in the context of a pretty tough macro environment over the last couple of years.

Hey, thanks for all the callers, Trent. I'll turn it over.

The next question is from Brian Bergmeier with Citi. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. You know, I think you said you're looking for about 60 to 70 basis points of underlying margin expansion this year. Wondering if maybe just from a high level, you could touch on your sort of inflation expectations across some of the major buckets, you know, labor, maintenance, repair, you know, that'd be pretty helpful.

Yeah. Overall, we're expecting an inflationary environment around three and a half percent. So again, when you think about that yield, On related revenue, four to four and a half, you're getting that 50 to 100 basis points of price and excess of cost inflation. And by bucket, I would sit there and say they're relatively close to the average. Some might be a little bit above, some a little bit below, but on average, call it in that three and a half percent range.

Okay, got it. Got it. That's really helpful. And then maybe just following up on Noah's question, hopefully not too redundant, is just... getting a sense of ES kind of progressing from 4Q into the first half. I think you talked about kind of rebuilding the pipeline and maybe some sequential improvement from like August to October. Obviously, the macro is not our friend right now, but just kind of gauge that sequential recovery maybe into 26. Thank you.

Yeah, I feel really good about the team's actions and discipline. Keep in mind, a lot of this can be a longer sales cycle business, whether it's recurring revenues or event-based work because of the compliance nature of the business. So jobs that we are working on now or winning now may not show up until Q3, Q4, even into Q1 of next year, which plays into what Del talked about, the first half having a pretty conservative posture and seeing more momentum in the second half of the business. And keep in mind, like, you know, emergency response has always been part of the business. It was historically low emergency response here last year, right? We've seen little yet, but those things can emerge, and those are always nice tailwinds to the business. Again, they typically, you know, happen in, you know, not huge chunks, but in chunks. But last year across the industry, it was just a very low year. So we get a little momentum there, and we could certainly run past the guide.

Great. Thanks a lot. I'll turn it over.

The next question is from Kevin Chiang with CIBC. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Maybe if I could just follow on ES there. You've still held the margins pretty well, low 20% despite some of the revenue pressures you mentioned. As we think of that revenue recovering, how do you think about incremental margins? Do they come back maybe a little bit better than you expected? It seems like you're holding costs pretty nicely here in some of this tougher macro.

Yeah, I'd say they'll be strong. We're holding costs and we're holding, we've done a good job of cost control, but we're also holding people. Again, we have to be ready to serve our customers. And so our labor utilization is lower than we would expect over the last couple of quarters. And, you know, we've done some fine tuning in places, but have certainly not optimized for the short term because we know there'll be momentum and growth coming back in the business. And so I think you will see very attractive margins on the increment as we continue to grow in the second half of next year, or this year, really.

That's helpful. And then just, you spoke of, you know, some of the opportunities you're seeing on the technology side, you know, on the RISE platform using AI, you know, total cost of operations below 58% for... for 25 here. Just one, as you think about the, I guess, over the longer term and you utilizing this technology, just maybe where you think that can go from a cost efficiency perspective.

Yeah, we'll do a little more work here and give you specific numbers, but these are going to be, over time, this is going to be, you know, cost improvements measured in nine figures for sure. I mean, there is a lot of efficiency that we can drive through and One minute across our system a year of routing efficiency on our routing side is worth $4 to $5 million. So you can see how that can accrue as you get optimized traffic patterns and optimize disposal optimization on our routes. And there's a lot of variables today. We do a very good job with the set of tools we have today. AI is a game changer of taking a lot of complexity and designing routes in a more efficient fashion. You'll see some of this on the back office side, and we've talked about call centers and the prepared remarks and just being able to service customers digitally in the way they want, getting them an answer and saving the cost of having people answering the phone. And then pricing is going to be a third big lever for us, which is getting very surgical in how we price. Again, we do a great job today with our current set of tools, but as we're now deploying AI, we're getting... far more scientific and really understanding customer lifetime value as we price these customers to get a great price today, but also a price that incents them to stay with us for a long period of time.

That's super helpful. Thanks for taking my questions.

The next question is from Adam Bubis with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Sorry, good evening. Just wondering if you could parse out the high-level organic growth performance and environmental solutions across the different business lines, because there's a lot going on under the hood, and understand the $50 million impact from lapping the non-recurring emergency response project, but hoping to get some color on how the landfill business is performing there, industrial services, you also have EMP, so just trying to get the moving pieces right.

yeah adam so all three of those things you mentioned were down on a year-over-year basis what i would tell you is the concentration to the landfill and the emp volumes being down is where you're seeing that fall through at a very high decremental margin so that's what's having the largest impact on margin performance so uh but all three of those uh businesses being down on a year-over-year basis but You know, as John mentioned, we're well positioned that as those units return into the system, we'll capture those units and we'll capture that at a similar margin that they're falling out, you know, that you're seeing in our performance right now.

And then one more on landfill gas. I think you mentioned $10 million incremental EBITDA in 2026. But can you just mark to market us on where we are on your realization of the $100 million increase? runway EBITDA for landfill gas, is that still the right number to think about and how you think about timing and the base that we're at today?

Yeah, by the time we get done with 2026, we'd be at about $40 million of that $120 million that we expect of incremental EBITDA contribution. If you recall, right, the EBITDA exceeds the revenue contribution because of our equity pickup in those projects where we have a joint venture. So Full run rate revenue, $100 million, $120 million of EBITDA. Great. Thanks so much.

The next question is from Trevor Romeo with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thank you for taking the questions. I just had a couple of quick ones, I think, on the ES business. One, it's just your PFAS remediation business. Love if you could maybe talk about what kind of revenue you're expecting for that business, maybe this year. and the forward outlook based on what you're hearing from both the regulatory side and the customer demand side just over the long-term opportunity there?

I'd say this year we'll probably be in the $50 to $75 million range. Really good ongoing recurring projects with customers where we're going site to site to remediate some of their PFAS. And then in terms of regulatory environment, we're believers that this is going to be a big growth opportunity over time. I think it's going to develop more slowly than it would have under a different administration. And, you know, we're working through the regulations, and we're on both sides of this, obviously. It's a big opportunity for us on the environmental solutions side and a growth opportunity for us on the landfill side in recycling and waste. Also could be a headwind, depending on the regulatory framework on the recycling and waste side, and we feel, I'd say, incrementally positive there in terms of a set of regulations that make sense and that we're not going to be penalized as a passive receiver.

Okay, thank you for that. And then maybe just sticking with another sort of long-term potential opportunity for the ES business, I guess reshoring as well as infrastructure funding and things like that as a medium-term, long-term tailwind. What are customers saying about that? How meaningful do you think any of those benefits could be at this point?

Yeah, I think there'll be – Very real. You think about the cheap energy supply we have here and you think about the policy of reshoring manufacturing. I think what we've seen in the very short term is as tariffs have gotten in place and uncertainty around trade policy, there's been a paralysis in terms of investments. People are waiting for the rules to shake out in terms of making bigger capital decisions about where to locate production and their broader supply chains. We're very optimistic that the rules will get settled here over a period of time and that there will be a tailwind from a demand standpoint. Whether that happens here in the next three months or that takes a little bit longer, I think that's TBD. But we remain very optimistic about that as a demand driver for ES and then also the manufacturing portion of our recycling and waste business as well.

Okay. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

The next question is from Tony Kaplan with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Yehuda Silverman on for Tony. Just had a quick question about the landfill focused within the M&A strategy. So like recent acquisitions in Kansas and then late in 2025 in Montana, like the industry has been sort of trending towards like a net landfill closure compared to openings or a more pressed landfill airspace expected over the next couple of decades. Can you talk to us a little bit about how the environment has been to get landfill expansions improved or opening of new landfills and has that shifted the M&A strategy towards perhaps acquiring maybe more landfill assets?

We've always been interested in acquiring post-collection infrastructure, recycling centers, landfills, transfer stations, and they're hard to come by, but when we see those opportunities, we'll certainly compete for those. And then in terms of landfill expansion, I think it's two very different stories. Siting a brand new landfill is extremely challenging and difficult, not impossible, but very challenging. Expanding current landfills is very geography dependent, but on balance, we feel very comfortable with around our capacity on airspace that we have across our network of 200 plus landfills. And part of that will be over the coming decades, you're going to see more waste move by rail and We've got 30-plus years of experience moving waste by rail, and that will be a bigger part of the equation, but we'll feel really good about our capacity to operate in that environment.

Got it. And then just a quick follow-up on price-cost spread. Just wanted to hear some of the levers that have been made on the cost side to make it a bit more manageable as pricing continues to moderately step down.

What is just the macro inflation? I think what people sometimes lose the story, the rate of our price increasing is coming down from the peak of inflation in 2022. But our cost is also coming down. The wage increase, the price we pay for parts, the price we pay to expand landfills, improve recycling centers, all of those expenses are also coming down. So we are maintaining the spread between that price and cost. And that is the predominant driver. Now, There's other things we do around productivity like RISE we've talked about and the efficiencies with AI and other things we do to drive our underlying cost structure and afford us the opportunity to invest in new things like the Polymer Center's electrification. So we've compressed certain parts of our cost structure, right, and we've expanded other ones which we view as investment and future growth opportunities.

Great. Thank you.

The next question is from Seth Weber with BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. Just a quick one on the ES space. Can you just talk about how the Shamrock integration is going? I mean, do you need to pick up an industrial activity to really get that thing, to get that moving? Or can you just talk to how, you know, the early progress has gone with that, the integration? Thanks.

Yeah, the integration progress has gone well. We're really happy about that business. A reminder, we bought that because we were already in the business. We were taking industrial water and liquids from our customers, and Shamrock was one of our suppliers. We were also using them for some leachate as well. So we were familiar with that. We had a lot of that material on our back, so we liked to be vertically integrated. It really had a lot of respect for Shamrock and what they built. And we'll see future growth opportunities in that space, right? They're predominantly a Southeast-based company, so we'll look for other opportunities because we see the same value creation opportunity in other regions.

Got it. Thanks. And then just the first quarter volume outlook, are you haircutting that for weather? Like, have you seen a big impact related to the winter storms? I think you referenced the East Coast was relatively rough. Is that kind of baked into your guidance at this point?

It is baked into the guide, and yes, we have seen a pretty significant impact from that. So just in the month of January alone, we're estimating about $25 million impact from weather, and the first week of February experienced weather as well. So that could be a $30, $35 million number in the first quarter, but that is embedded in the guide itself. But to your point, from a timing perspective, then Q1 volume will look less because of that. That will be incorporated into our Q1 performance.

Appreciate it, guys. Thank you.

The next question is from David Manthe with Baird. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. First question on the emergency response. I think in addition to the lack of jobs that are out there, I think you said last year that you thought maybe there was a gap between the jobs you thought you should win and those that you were winning. Could you just talk about the that, that situation and have you addressed the main sources of, of the growth gap as you see it? Yeah, I don't think that was limited to just emergency response. I think that was true for all event based, uh, work and even recurring work. I think we were just getting the price volume equation, right? We'd put a lot of upward pressure on price and deservedly so, because we want to get paid for the value we deliver the same time the market had moved in terms of the volume situation. and people were getting more aggressive on price, so the team had to adjust. I think the team's done a great job of that. We feel really good about the pipeline. As I mentioned earlier, there's a longer sales cycle business, and so we'll see the fruits of that labor surface more in the second half of this year and then certainly in the next year. Okay, and then from a cost standpoint, I guess the maintenance and repair expenses have been trending well based on refreshing the fleet, but I was also wondering on transportation and subcontractor costs. They basically flatlined over the past three years. I was just wondering if you could outline what's been the cause of that.

I think some of that's just when you think about renegotiating some of those contracts, I think our procurement department's done a really good job of renegotiating those at favorable rates. Some of that, there was a reset a couple years back, you know, coming off the pandemic where you did see a pretty big increase, and now we've modulated into more normal year-over-year increases.

Thank you.

The next question is from Stephanie Moore with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you so much. I wanted to go back on maybe what you're seeing from an underlying environment. I mean, I think we all saw some of the industrial data points, notably ISM manufacturing, PMI kind of inflecting to expansionary for the first time in January for some time. You know, I think the hope is maybe that's a leading indicator for a bit of a recovery here. So curious if you saw or more so maybe had some conversations with any of your customers that would suggest that, you know, that we're maybe warming up a little bit on that side of the business. So any insight there would be helpful. Thanks.

I think there's certainly positive signs. I mentioned the West half of the U S you're starting to certainly pick up an economic activity. That'd be said. There's other signs where people are still waiting and they're still on the sideline waiting for stability of policy around capital investment. We're seeing still, you know, we're winning in terms of share on the manufacturing side, but that output in terms of units per facility is still pretty flat in So we're waiting some upside there. Same thing with construction. Now, construction, given the seasonality of it, we're not going to get a great read for that for another three to four months. Based on the macro picture of the United States needing more housing, you'd certainly feel good about that and some movement on interest rates. All of that would be a positive sign. Whether that unlocks growth yet, we've been waiting a while and cautiously optimistic we could see some momentum there as well.

Got it. Yep. No, that's super clear. And then I apologize if you said this, but did you give what your underlying kind of inflationary expectations were for 2026?

Yeah, it's approximately 3.5%.

Excellent. Thanks, guys.

Thank you.

The next question is from Shlomo Rosenbaum with Stiefel. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you for taking my questions. I want to talk a little bit about what's going on in the C&D with the yield spiking up like 6.5%. It's the largest we've seen in a couple years now. And what are you seeing in the service intervals, small container versus large container, quarter over quarter? And then kind of contrasting that with the volume being down so much. Was that the comp last year on some of the emergency stuff? Maybe you can talk about that, please.

Yeah, let's start with the volume on the C&D. Some of that's just comping some one-time event jobs that we had in the prior year. I would say when you take a look at that 6.5%, and mind you, this is off of a really small base, so small numbers can actually look a little bit larger than they are, but it's probably a little bit more mix-related than anything else. If you look at the trend of what we've seen on C&D yield in that circa 4% range, it's I think that's probably a pretty good indication of where we've been and where we would expect to be here over the next several quarters. Okay. And service intervals? Yeah, service intervals, if you take a look at that, they've continued to outpace service decreases on that front. There's a little bit of seasonality that we typically see coming into the fourth quarter, but the trend for the full year is we've seen more service level increases than decreases.

Okay, thanks. And then just following, can you talk a little bit about the contribution also from the polymer centers in 25 and what is assumed in that outlook? You talked a little bit about R&G, but if it was polymer centers, I must have missed that.

Yeah, polymer center in 25 added about $45 million worth of revenue and about $10 million of incremental EBITDA. Okay, and expectation for 26? would be $30 million of incremental revenue and $10 million of incremental EBITDA. Okay. Thank you very much.

The next question is from Toby Sommer with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I'm curious what you're seeing in terms of the healthcare vertical. Hospitals, you know, kind of healthcare activity seems to be running relatively hot And just curious to the extent you've got visibility in that industry that you could share with us, that'd be helpful.

Yeah, we compete there on the margin. We don't have a dedicated medical waste business, a small one in Las Vegas. And outside of that, we're not in that space. We certainly service hospitals and other healthcare providers with recycling and waste. And that's been a nice growth driver as we've seen the broader healthcare spend go up over time, but not a meaningful growth driver for us.

If we look at the spread in the margin expansion that you're able to achieve and kind of put the pricing and revenue volume to one side and really focus on the expense side, to what extent do you think you've got opportunities to invest more in tech, extract some savings and efficiencies through AI and other means to restrain your level of expense growth even further and contribute to a greater spread expansion?

Yeah, I mentioned earlier, right, we're spending a lot of money on technology because we see the return, clearly. Some of that is AI. Some of that is just modernizing our existing systems and updating that. And I mentioned we think there's nine figures of opportunity over time on productivity and how we route. We see real opportunities on pricing. I know this is on the cost side, but that'll be another growth driver. And then Every element of our support, including how we answer calls, how we process orders and invoices, everywhere on the chain, we're challenging how work gets done. And AI is going to be a very powerful tool that is going to show up in terms of compressing our inflation over time.

At this time, there appear to be no further questions. Mr. Vander Ark, I'll turn the call back over to you for closing remarks.

Thank you, Gary. I want to thank the Republic Services team for their great work in 2025. Their focus on safety, sustainability, and exceeding customer expectations led to another year of great results and positions us well for continued success. Have a good evening and be safe.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the conference call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.