This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk08: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Smartsheet fourth quarter fiscal 2022 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, please press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press star one. Thank you. Aaron Turner, head of investor relations, you may begin your conference.
spk09: Thank you, Josh. Good afternoon and welcome everyone to Smartsheet's fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 earnings call. We will be discussing the results announced in our press release issued after the market closed today. With me today are Smartsheet CEO Mark Mader and our CFO Pete Godwell. Today's call is being webcast and will also be available for replay on our investor relations website at investors.smartsheet.com. There's a slide presentation that accompanies Pete's prepared remarks, which can be viewed in the events section of our investor relations website. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and other factors, including but not limited to those described in our SEC filings available on our investor relations website, and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, our actual results may differ materially and adversely. All forward-looking statements made during this call are based on information available to us as of today. We do not assume any obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events, except as required by law. In addition to the U.S. GAAP financials, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures is available in the presentation that accompanies this call, which can also be found on our investor relations website. With that, let me turn the call over to Mark.
spk01: Thank you, Aaron, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to our fourth quarter earnings call for FY22. Before speaking to our results, I'd like to start by sharing that our thoughts and support are with the people of Ukraine and all those affected. Today we'll be sharing the results of an outstanding quarter that rolls up to an extraordinary year at Smartsheet. We'll also discuss our proven strategy that reinforces my confidence in our growth trajectory and will keep us positioned at the top of the CWM category. While Pete will provide details, I want to share some standout results, first for the quarter and then for the year. Smartsheet revenue for Q4 grew 43% year-over-year to $157.4 million, and billings grew 48% year-over-year to $224 million. We closed out the year with more than 10 million Smartsheet users. Q4 saw both a new quarterly record of 286 deals of more than $50,000 and a new quarterly record of 98 deals of more than $100,000, up 107% and 128% respectively year-over-year. Given the acceleration of billings in FY22, the momentum in the business is very strong, and I'm confident with the setup as we start FY23. According to Okta's 2022 Business at Work study, Smartsheet is now the most popular work management platform that businesses use alongside Microsoft 365. In fact, Smartsheet is the only work management platform to appear on Okta's list of the eight most popular apps used in conjunction with M365. We've also been included as a top performer on the 2022 Capterra shortlist of the highest scoring project management software products based on feedback from thousands of users. Additionally, we've earned the most five-star customer reviews in both the CWM and PPM categories of Gartner Peer Insights. By delivering a no-code enterprise solution in which more people and more teams can move more quickly to take action and drive outcomes that matter, Smartsheet customers are realizing significant returns on their Smartsheet investments. Our unique land expand and climb motion drives a category-leading dollar-based net retention rate inclusive of all customers of over 134%. We continue to make significant progress on improving the land motion. Between the introduction of the pro plan, simplification of our onboarding processes, and the success of our new business team has had selling advance to new customers New business volume is at record levels. In fact, Q4 was a record quarter for new business bookings and a record quarter for the number of licenses purchased by new customers. As customers graduate from basic productivity use cases to transforming larger operational workflows, we see uptake and acceptance across more departments. We also continue to enable viral growth inside and outside of customer organizations. By allowing free use of the product by anyone who's invited to collaborate, we pull our customers' extended teams, partners, and suppliers into that Smartsheet environment, letting them experience the benefits of Smartsheet firsthand. Today, with a best-in-class net expansion rate, our expansion motion continues to fire on all cylinders. In Q4, we saw expansions from companies such as Target, Lucid Motors, Herman Miller, Zendesk, Beyond Meat, PACCAR, General Mills, Daimler, and Goodwill. But our growth is fueled by more than expanding our user base. We continue to see success with Smartsheet climbing up the value chain as customers attach to mission-critical workflows across systems and people within their organizations. In FY22, we saw a global media conglomerate triple its ARR to over $2 million. This significant growth was driven by both paid license additions, of which they added over 1,000 paid seats, and Advanced Gold. This organization added $300,000 in ARR in Q4 alone. A global wireless communication provider doubled their ARR in FY22 through 14 separate transactions of $50,000 or more. These represented sales to new departments as well as expansion across existing departments, up-leveling their Smartsheet usage by attaching capabilities that allowed groups to scale and integrate Smartsheet workflows. This land expand and climb scenario repeats itself again and again, increasing the active user base within the Smartsheet ecosystem, which in turn leads to growth of our user license space and deployment in high value workloads. Now I'd like to underscore some of the product developments that are fueling our growth. In Q2 of FY22, we introduced Smartsheet Advanced and created a new tiered way for customers to unlock the full potential of Smartsheet to scale. Advanced Silver enables businesses to orchestrate sophisticated programs, projects, and processes using tools like Control Center. Customers can also create curated no-code applications to drive workflows across internal and external collaborators using Work Apps and Dynamic View. In Q4, the total number of created Work Apps grew 28% quarter over quarter to over 69,000. With Advanced Gold, Customers get a comprehensive set of data integration capabilities that enable the import and export of millions of records to and from other systems using Data Shuttle and Data Table. They can also trigger data processing workflows based on events using Bridge, as well as continuously synchronizing data between Smartsheet and other systems using our real-time connectors. Data Shuttle is now transferring over 3 billion records every month, up from 1.7 billion in Q2. At the top tier, Advanced Platinum adds key capabilities for organizations that desire additional levels of compliance, governance, and advanced policy measurement. The advisory practice at BDO, one of the world's largest accounting networks, purchased Advanced Gold in Q4. Advanced will support many aspects of their business, including practice forecasting and planning, portfolio performance tracking, and standardizing cross-functional projects across practice areas. When we introduced ADVANCE, our expectations were that new customers would use Smartsheet for a period of time for simpler use cases before moving up to Smartsheet ADVANCE. Instead, we're starting to see a meaningful number of new customers choosing ADVANCE from the start. Just in Q4, over 20% of the ADVANCE deals we closed were to new customers of Smartsheet. ADVANCE features resonates with customers at organizations of all sizes, from million-dollar-plus ARR customers in the Fortune 500 to organizations like the Olympia School District in Washington State. The Olympia School District is using Advanced to scale as they add more projects to develop a process for grant management. They're looking to pave the way for other school districts to embrace technology solutions that can help them better serve their communities. Our innovation velocity continues to produce as well. Some highlights include work insights, allowing users to automatically analyze and visualize sheet data as a snapshot time series or crosstab, enterprise plan manager, ensuring all of an organization's Smartsheet plans follow security, governance, and compliance requirements, unified resource management, making it seamless to build the best team for the job all from within one core Smartsheet experience. And just last week, we announced deep integration of Brandfolder's top-rated digital asset management capabilities into the Smartsheet platform after working with a diverse set of beta customers. Enhancing the functionality between Smartsheet and brand folder helps customers better align their marketing and creative work by streamlining asset management. For example, a content development manager at IS Clinical can now manage the development of visual assets for the company's website in one unified solution. When creatives bring assets into brand folder, the integration is used to surface those assets in Smartsheet, manage approvals, and reflect the completion of deliverables. Customers can now see brand folder insights like asset views, downloads, and shares within Smartsheet, helping marketers make more informed, creative decisions. Since acquiring brand folder, we've extended the value of Smartsheet across a broad set of use cases with customers like Ethan Allen, Wynn Resorts, and U-Haul. On the security front, the threat landscape is rapidly evolving and intensifying. More and more CIOs and CISOs are deeply inspecting critical data governance and controls. Capabilities such as customer-controlled encryption keys, integrations with corporate directories and data loss prevention and classification systems, granular sharing, and egress controls are differentiating Smartsheet as the most enterprise-ready CWM platform in the market. An example of the security-first focus we're seeing comes from a top five investment firm. Earning the trust of the VP of Information Security was a key step in getting IT to adopt and promote Smartsheet across the organization. With securities buy-in, Smartsheet was deployed across a number of use cases, including investment management, capital analysis, and corporate strategy, representing a six-figure expansion in Q3. This was quickly followed by an additional expansion in Q4 to support several additional workstreams. We are in the middle of a massive greenfield opportunity with over a billion knowledge workers globally, where only a very small fraction of them have discovered the power of Smartsheet. And while most of our deals involve replacing the status quo of highly manual processes and primitive tools like spreadsheets, emails, and presentations, we are also displacing competitive CWM products as well. One such win was with a global production company that delivers thousands of events worldwide. The company initially engaged with Smartsheet while using a competitive CWM product, but their existing solution lacked the adaptability, scale, and integrations required to manage the full scope of their work. We were able to demonstrate Smartsheet's ability to meet their needs at scale. This includes delivering time savings and smoother customer handoffs from their sales organization using our Microsoft Dynamics Connector, making informed resourcing decisions with Smartsheet Resource Management, supplying their creative teams with best-in-class creative collaboration capabilities via brand folder, delivering a better customer experience with dashboards and a mobile app that connects employees in the field. Over the past few years, we've invested in high-potential markets like Europe, Asia-Pac, and the US federal government. In October of last year, we launched Smartsheet Regions, offering in the EU, enabling customers to establish plans with their content hosted in Germany. Already, we're unlocking opportunities and quickly gaining momentum with EU customers. One of them, a European biotech company, is using Smartsheet to manage the release of its cancer treatment therapeutics. The company started with our US-based region, but was unable to fully deploy Smartsheet on the Smartsheet platform due to EU data privacy requirements. But with our EU region, this company was able to invest in both Smartsheet Enterprise and Advanced Silver, leveraging control center and dynamic view to help scale out therapeutic development workflows. Building on our international investments, we established a sales office in Germany and will be expanding into Japan this fiscal year. To close, we're positioned in the right place at the right time as the market for modern work management grows rapidly. We're hiring exceptional people and giving them the tools, resources, and latitude they need to do great things. In a tight job market, We expanded our team by more than 600 people in FY22. I have never felt more certain about our success going forward. Customers are choosing Smartsheet in record numbers, and the investments we're making across sales, marketing, and product will directly support our growth for the years to come. Now I'll turn it over to Pete.
spk00: Thank you, Mark, and good afternoon, everyone. As Mark mentioned, we finished the year strong with Q4 results that exceeded our guidance across the board and culminated in accelerating Billing's growth on a full year basis. We continued to experience strong momentum in our business fueled by increasing awareness of the Smartsheet platform, continued success with our advanced offering, and strong execution by our sales and product team. I will now go through our financial results for the full year and the fourth quarter. Unless otherwise stated, all references to our expenses and operating results are on a non-GAAP basis, and are reconciled to our GAAP results in the earnings release and presentation that was posted before the call. For the full year FY22, we ended with total revenue of $550.8 million, up 43% year over year. Billings of $661.5 million of 47% year-over-year. Operating loss of $34.2 million and free cash flow of negative $20.8 million. We ended the year with annual recurring revenue of $638 million, a year-over-year increase of nearly $200 million. Next, I will provide additional details on our fourth quarter financial results. Fourth quarter revenue came in at $157.4 million, up 43% year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $145.7 million, representing year-over-year growth of 44%. Services revenue was $11.7 million, representing year-over-year growth of 34%. Turning to billings. Fourth quarter billings came in strong at $224.3 million, representing year-over-year growth of 48%. Approximately 93% of our subscription billings were annual, with 4% monthly. Quarterly and semi-annual represented approximately 3% of the total. Multi-year billings represented less than 1% of total billings. Moving on to our reported metrics. The number of customers with ARR over $50,000 grew 55% year-over-year to 2,354, and the number of customers with ARR over $100,000 grew 74% year-over-year to 1,026. These customer segments now represent 55% and 41%, respectively, of total ARRs. The percentage of our ARR coming from customers with ARR over $5,000 is now 86%. Next, our domain average ACV grew 37% year-over-year to $6,977. We ended the quarter with a dollar-based net retention rate of 134%, a three percentage point improvement from Q3. The full churn rate dropped further and remains below 5 percent. For FY23, we expect our dollar-based net retention rate to be above 130 percent. Now, turning back to the financials, our total gross margin was 82 percent. Our Q4 subscription gross margin was 87 percent. We expect our gross margin for FY23 to remain above 80 percent. Overall, operating loss in the quarter was negative $14.5 million, or 9% of revenue. Pre-cash flow was negative $2.7 million, which overachieved against our guidance due to strong collections. Now let me move on to guidance. Starting in FY23, we will be reverting to our pre-COVID approach by providing billings and free cash flow guidance on a full year basis only. Given the growing seasonality in our business, we expect our quarterly billings cadence to be more weighted towards the back half of the year with the lowest percentage of billings on an absolute and growth basis occurring in the first quarter and then building towards the back of the year. The factors that contribute to this growing seasonality are the expansion of additional territories, internal promotions to quota carrying or management roles, the front-loaded hiring of new sales reps, and an in-person sales kickoff in March. For the first quarter of FY23, we expect revenue to be in the range of $162 to $163 million, non-GAAP operating loss to be in the range of $25 to $23 million, and non-GAAP net loss per share to be between 20 and 18 cents. based on weighted average shares outstanding of 128 million. For the full year FY23, we expect revenue to be in the range of 750 to $755 million, representing growth of 36 to 37 percent. Billings are expected to be in the range of 905 to $925 million, representing growth of 37 to 40 percent. We expect non-GAAP operating loss to be in the range of $90 to $80 million, and non-GAAP net loss per share to be between 70 and 62 cents for the year, based on approximately 128.5 million weighted average shares outstanding. We expect free cash flow to be between negative 15 and negative $10 million. Given the momentum in our business, combined with incremental investment opportunities we see this year, global field capacity, international expansion, and brand awareness, we expect continuing targeted investments with both short-term and multi-year impacts, while modestly improving pre-cash flow margins. To conclude, we finished FY22 with tremendous momentum, which we expect to continue into FY23. We have high conviction in our long-term growth opportunity and will continue to invest appropriately. Now, let me turn it back to the operator for questions. Operator?
spk08: At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, please press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Michael Turin with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
spk03: Hey there. Thanks. Appreciate you taking the questions. I guess first, you mentioned displacing other CWMs and some wins in the prepared remarks. Anything else you could share, Mark, around what's driving that? Maybe you can also just spend a moment on what drives competitive differentiation for Smartsheet today. Thank you.
spk01: Yeah, I think while the bulk of the business is still displacing, I would say, traditional tools and workflows, We are seeing opportunities as we land in more nodes within a business to really encroach on where other people may have presence. And as companies are looking at larger investments, they are looking to, in some cases, rationalize. If they can move to one platform that meets their security compliance and their functional needs, that's really a win. It drives efficiency for them. Again, it's more on the occasional front, but it was notable in the sense that we had a few really nice-sized wins and growth opportunities that either happened displacing a competitor or we were growing very tremendously around a competitor who was in an account. And again, I think as we look at why we're succeeding, it is really compelling to have a conversation with a customer when you have confidence in your portfolio when it's highly differentiated. It's not a discussion on faster, prettier, qualitative things. It's really things that are highly quantitative. I think the advanced offering where people can get their heads around scaled process with control center and such, integration with data shuttle, those are things others simply don't provide. And that I think is proving out really nicely in the advanced statistics we've been able to post.
spk03: It's very helpful. Pete, one more if I may. The free cash flow margin guide getting close to break even in the coming year. looks on pace for that 10% target level. The operating margin guide in that backdrop looks maybe a bit lighter than what we've expected. So could you remind us what might broaden the gap between those two margins in the coming year? And then maybe we can revisit, you ticked off a couple of things where those investments are heading.
spk00: So Michael, you know, you should think of billings and free cash flow as sort of going together and they're sort of lagged by revenue and off margin. So when you think about sort of the gap, we are going to be hiring sort of a fairly large capacity in the field to go after this opportunity Mark talked about. That's going to represent itself in billings growth and cash flow, which is what's reflected in our guide and the improving guide we've provided. There is a lag between the billings converting to revenue, and that's what's reflected in the off-margin guide. So you see that sort of following as a lag behind the free cash flow number.
spk03: Thanks. Nice job closing out the year. Appreciate it.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Stan Slotsky with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
spk10: Hi, guys. This is Ben Misodian for Stan. I think the first question from our end, maybe can we just dig into the investments, especially in this market environment, which seems to be paying more attention to profitability given sort of large market opportunity, how's your team thinking about the trade off between flowing through potential returns to top line beats of bottom line versus reinvesting back into business? Let's start there and then we can dig in.
spk00: So, Ben, you know, your question in terms of sort of where are we investing, I'll take that as a first partner. At the end, I'll cover sort of how we're thinking about it more broadly. So when you think of our investments, we're making investments in sales and marketing to go after this opportunity. And in rank order, we're making investments with first an increase in global field capacity. It's across the board, but it's focused on international with some greater emphasis on international and enterprise customers. And that's about ramping these people, getting them productive. That's the first part of it. Orders of magnitude, that's about three points. year on year, if you will. The second part of it is global awareness. Think about it as top of funnel and mid-funnel, getting our customers to know or people to know who we are. And lastly, we've got sort of a resumption and in-person customer engagement and field enablement spending that's starting to sort of get closer up to the pre-COVID level. So those are our three factors in sales and marketing that are driving it. To your question of, like, how are we thinking about it, you know, we're driving this business with, you know, a solid eye to our unit economics and the customer signal we've been getting. Mark talked about the tremendous momentum we've seen. That's really fueling sort of how we invest. And then we're looking at the specific numbers in terms of how we metric this thing, the LTD to CAC. Those are the ways we sort of think of that investment.
spk10: Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe one more on fiscal 23 billings guidance. Essentially, with billing guidance implying, let's say, roughly like 38 percent of growth, if net revenue retention stays between low to mid-130 range, it almost feels like there's limited implied new customer acquisitions. So, maybe just walk us through how you think about the pace of new logo acquisitions for fiscal 23 and what's implied in the guidance there.
spk00: Yeah, so, you know, you should think of, if you think of the total build for billings, it comes from, like, a few spots. It comes from new customers, expansion of new customers, and it comes from the numbers we captured on net dollar attention rate. So we've guided you to the numbers in terms of what net dollar attention rate expectations are at 130%. If we sort of stated those levels, we expect healthy sort of contributions from new and expansion in new. And as Mark said, you know, we're focused on both ends of the spectrum. We're thinking of enterprise growth, and we're looking at number of logos we land at the lower end as well as licenses we land there.
spk10: Got it. Thank you so much.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of George Iwanek with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.
spk12: Thank you for taking my questions. Pete, maybe just following up on the new business strength, are Are you seeing any changes in the use cases that people start with Smartsheet? And, you know, can you also give us a sense of, you know, once they do start, how quickly, you know, they start to cross across departments or start to expand across departments?
spk01: We really haven't seen it. This is Mark. We haven't really seen a deviation from what's driven demand over the last couple of years. This notion of programs, projects and process. I mean, that is those are the three big vectors. Those are very deep veins. It's where most people start. Project-oriented use cases are still the tip of the spear. The diversification that we see isn't really so much a difference in the process or the area. It's more the function that it serves. So it may come in in marketing and branch into operation or into finance. But we really have not seen a deviation from what we've observed in the last few years. It remains a similar land and expand and then climb motion.
spk12: And Mark, given the environment that we're seeing right now, are you seeing any changes with your European customers? Are they taking a bit more cautious view of spending or making any other adjustments?
spk01: We have not seen it yet, no. The motion we have around selling to existing customers, landing new, we have not seen a blip at all in any of our regions.
spk12: All right. Have you built in any conservatism in your guidance for kind of the geopolitical outlook?
spk00: So, George, you know, we've sort of assumed the environment we have today stays largely similar. So we have not assumed any big, you know, turns in the environment that turn negative. But we assume the current environment sort of persists is our assumption.
spk12: Thank you very much.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Terry Tillman with Truist Securities. Your line is open.
spk05: Yeah, thanks. First, can you all hear me okay?
spk01: Yeah.
spk05: We can, Terry. Okay, thanks. Hey, Mark, Pete, and Aaron, thanks for taking my questions as well. The first question for you, Mark, is as it relates to the introduction of ProPlan, what I'm curious about is, What are you seeing so far in terms of the customer adoption? Is it smaller organizations, or is this actually a lower friction way of actually getting midsize or bigger enterprises to get going? And then I had a follow-up for Pete.
spk01: It's all up and down the spectrum, Terry. And when we see people starting, it's not an S or an M or a large enterprise type state, but people start from all size organizations. And the effect that we're seeing is improvement in conversion rates. People have a faster start, and then it's our job to understand who's signing up and then to apply the field capacity that we have to make sure that if it is a large customer with high potential and interest to grow, that we're there and ready to support them. And if it's a small customer, putting the self-directed mechanisms in place where they can thrive. But, yeah, it's really neat to see both the conversion rate improvement domestically and internationally across those different segment sizes. Pete? Was there a question, Terry, you had for Pete as well? Got it.
spk05: Yeah, I did. I did. Thanks. Thanks for that, Mark. Yeah, so, Pete, just a follow-up question. And I don't have my notes from the analyst day in front of me, so I apologize. So part of this is going to need some help regurgitating kind of the guideposts. But you are talking about a pretty significant ramp in investing here for growth, and I think you've called out some of those areas, including international sales capacity. Does this change kind of the path to a billion or just, Anything more about what this could mean in terms of that longer-term kind of revenue ramp and getting to that target? Thank you.
spk00: So, Terry, we're not changing sort of anything relative to what we've shared with you. You know, essentially the only thing we've sort of given you is the guidance for fiscal year 23. And the key salient points to take away from that are, first of all, we've guided you to a free cash flow margin that will imply improvement year on year. And that's sort of a part of our trend, driving to sort of what I call responsible growth.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Steve Enders with KeyBank. Your line is open.
spk16: Hey, great. Thanks for taking the question here. I guess I just want to get a little bit better sense for how you're thinking about the investments that you are making in sales capacity. It seems like you and all of your closest competitors so far have raised the outlook and spend for this next year. So I guess what kind of gives you the confidence and the ROI of those investments that you're putting to work? Are you kind of pulling forward any sales hires that maybe you're thinking about? from 24 before, and how should we kind of think about the impact this could potentially have on the model going forward?
spk01: I think the confidence is really driven by a convergence of a few factors. There is a massive uptick in awareness of the category that's first The second is, based on some of the offerings we have, whether it's new packaging or new products we're bringing into the portfolio, the product market fit is proving out. And much like Advance was new in Q2 of last year, we're almost three quarters into this now. So the evidence is starting to really take root The other piece is from a go-to-market standpoint, we have figured out the mechanism for landing somebody, growing someone to modest contribution, and then up through the tiers of 25, 50, 100, half a million, and beyond. So that is a model that we feel very confident in, and that's reacting to customer signal as well, not just sort of the state of the market overall. And when you look at being deeply entrenched at the world's largest companies with a high ability to invest in this category, You have to feed that. So in the past calls, I've often talked about when you see the green light, you must go. Like the green light is on right now. We have to follow this. And when you look at the LTV to CAC, which has been improving over the last year, it's improved from the high single digits to like greater than 13. Now that's not going to manifest itself in sort of the in-year measures, but when you look at LTV to CAC, which is north of 13, that gives you great confidence in longer horizon investments. So we are very much pushing the throttle forward.
spk16: Okay, that's very helpful. So, I mean, I guess to put a kind of final point on it, it seems like it's becoming a more repeatable sales motion that the good marketing teams are going after, and Smartsheet Advance is kind of a part of that. Is that kind of the right way to kind of frame that?
spk01: Absolutely. You know, we have over 500 advanced transactions now at companies, both new, midsize, all the way up to our largest customer. So we're pattern matching off of that. And it's something we're doing domestically in all the segments up and down. And, again, just riding that momentum.
spk00: And one question you asked, Steve, is what's the future model look like? So, you know, we've talked about these field investments in the areas that Mark just mentioned. They're across, you know, all the major areas of opportunity. And as these resources become productive, we expect the resumption of scale across those OpEx line items. That's the way you would model it.
spk16: Okay, perfect. Thank you. Thanks for taking the questions.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Mark Murphy with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.
spk15: Yes, thank you very much. So I'm a little surprised. The sequential billings growth in Q4 – is just very strong. It's actually stronger than your seasonal norms. And we've kind of been seeing the opposite across the industry. So I'm just wondering if there was anything unusual. Were there any, you know, one or two unusual mega deals or, you know, discrete needle movers that might have affected that? Or is this something that was more broad-based in Q4?
spk00: So, Mark, the short answer is it was broad-based, just field momentum, customer interest, nothing unusual, nothing out of the ordinary, just solid demand as Mark referenced in his earlier comments. Customers are seeing the value of this. We're seeing, you know, progression across all elements of it, large deals, advanced, the dollar-based net retention rate is up. We're just seeing it across the board.
spk01: Yeah, but this quarter did not hinge on a mega deal. This is tens and tens and tens of 50 and 100 and 100-plus K deals. We welcome the mega deal, but this quarter did not hinge on that.
spk15: Yeah, okay, interesting. Mark, my second question is just from the perspective of building pipeline. Is it currently more effective for you to emphasize work management positioning or actually low-code, no-code positions? Just given there's so much buzz around low code and there's so much imperative to try to put those products into the hands of the people that are kind of the subject matter experts, so I'm just curious if you're kind of able to realize an extra tailwind due to your strength and your linkage on the low code side.
spk01: I would say that's building, but I wouldn't say that's the key tailwind. I mean, the key tailwind is people now recognizing there's an investment opportunity that helps them unlock value that sits within their business units. So they're saying, I have big opportunities to pursue. I'm stretched on my IT front. How do I unlock my business units to actually make progress? So when they call, they don't call up and say, hey, I'm looking for a work management platform. Hey, I'm looking for a no-code solution. They're saying, I have a business problem. I think you can help. And then our job is to map to that use case and that business case that they articulate. But I would say the predominant call on the inbound isn't centered around no code or work management. But the nice thing is it's starting to feel natural to people like, hey, this is the area of product and technology investment that can enable my business team. And that is, again, that's not a philosophical sale anymore. That's starting to hit mainstream.
spk15: One final one, Pete. If we're able to look within the sales and marketing budget, can you comment at all just on the spend on digital advertising or performance marketing? As a percentage of revenue, is that increasing or decreasing this fiscal year? I guess I'm just trying to understand that vector of investment versus direct field sales, if you will.
spk00: You know, Mark, we've taken the approach that we think of demand gen, we think of marketing spend as being a combination of various channels. The PPC is one of the channels. It's not our biggest. Our biggest channel is how we organically have people find us through content. It's through viral adoption. It's through sharing. So to answer your question, yes, our percentage of sort of spend is up, but it's sort of consistent the way we've ramped it up for Q4. That's the way we're staying with sort of our marketing investment.
spk08: Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Alex Zukin with Wolf Research. Your line is open.
spk04: Hey, guys. Congrats on the quarter. Most of my questions have been asked, but I guess the two that come to mind are If we look at the gradients both around retention and expansion, how much more room is there to go before we kind of hit the assent? I mean, sub-5% churn is among best in class at this point. How much lower can that rate go? And also the 134, I think you're almost back to your all-time highs of 135. Is there, you know, as you unlock these new advance motions as you unlock some of these new enterprise sales cycles and and the climb motion specifically like is there I know we're talking about 130 which is already I think an increase from what we had you had mentioned before was associated with next year but like aspirational ears are we at new peaks to some extent and then I've got a quick follow-up yeah like I would say we are still at the single dent single digit penetration within our customers as a whole so the upside is
spk01: But when I think of achieving greatness, you don't achieve greatness through expense saving or through reducing your loss from 5 to 4.2. You achieve greatness by expanding. And when it's paired with lower losses, fantastic. But when I look at even our largest accounts, We have a number of accounts that you would consider wall-to-wall, but so many of our big accounts still have massive upside. So, you know, we typically guide based on the signal we're seeing. As Pete just said, we're actually north of 130 this coming year. We're not capping ourselves to say, here's a max. You know, we will continue to do things, either expansion, cross-selling advanced capabilities, serving up adjacent offerings like DAM. Like, yeah, we're not capping ourselves at all, and I think we have a really exciting portfolio to cross-sell in Got it.
spk04: And then I guess this is a two-parter, but it's on everybody's mind. To the point that people have, I think, asked you about the investment dynamic for next year and investing to grow. Again, all three companies, public companies in this category and probably some of the private ones as well, have been spent, you know, are talking about spending more money investing to grow. Is this a race for share? Is this a... you know, coming out of COVID, the opportunity is even kind of higher. And to the point that you made, I want to connect this to the point that you made around replacing one of the vendors. It's the first time I think you've talked about that on an earnings call, at least. And I guess, do you do that because you see more opportunities like that in the pipeline and you're now investing to, you know, take share to some extent? I know those are two separate questions, but, you know, I guess humor the stream of consciousness.
spk01: Yeah, I guess the first thing I'll say is our investment posture and thesis isn't based on reacting to someone else's move. So when we think about investing in our field scale, investing in our non-PPC marketing, those are all plays that we have identified based on what we're observing within our base. Is there a race? I mean, we are clearly looking to continue to optimize and to add more and more logos, which we proved out starting in the second half of this year. I would say in terms of displacement, you know, it's our job to provide maximum value to our existing customers. If there happens to be another player who's present, we will gladly grow around them. We will try and displace them. But in terms of where we spend our time, It is, we don't think the best return on investment is to go hunting for displacement. If someone happens to be there, absolutely, take them out. Show greater value, consolidate. But I wouldn't say that the market is at the stage where that is the focal point for our company.
spk02: Perfect, thank you guys.
spk08: Yeah. Your next question comes from the line of DJ Hines with Canaccord. Your line is open.
spk13: Hey guys, congrats on the strong finish of the year. Mark, with the customers that are landing with Advanced, are you taking a more active direct sales approach there, or is that land still largely a self-discovery motion?
spk01: Those come, DJ, in an assisted motion. So we think it's our duty to land somebody in a really fulsome way, so that's helping them understand what almost the guidebook looks like to get started. So when you deploy an Advanced platform with Control Center, Dynamic View, Data Shuttle, super useful for people to understand what those best practices are. And I would say sometimes those are more sophisticated processes where customers are really hungry to say, hey, how have others done it? How can I de-risk and how can I maximize my investments? So whether that's through a sales rep or customer success or other functions we have, I would say there's a very strong customer appetite for that. And, again, one of the things that we're looking to do even more of is we build out our field capacity.
spk13: Yep, yep, got it. And then, Pete, the follow-up for you would just be around the numbers. So you grew headcount, I don't know, it was like 32%, 33% in fiscal 22. What are your targets for headcount growth this year, kind of implicit in the operating loss targets that you gave us?
spk00: So, DJ, you know, If you think about what Mark just mentioned, you know, the growth that we would get would be in various roles that help sort of customers grow. We're not sort of talking about reps anymore or, you know, how many we're adding. We're going to add a significant number of these field roles. And if you want to think of that in terms of dollar terms, I gave you a rough sense that field capacity will approximately be three points of operating margin change year over year as a part of the model.
spk13: Okay. Got it. Thank you, guys.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Brent Phil with Jefferies. Your line is open.
spk14: Thanks. Mark, the new business record levels you commented on, are you seeing any new dynamic there where you're starting larger, you're seeing, you know, multinational wins? What color would you add to that that could give us a little more granularity of what you're seeing on the new business side and And, Pete, no surprise I'm going to ask on the operating loss. I mean, a loss of $35 million to negative $90 million was almost 3x what the street was expecting. I guess many are asking us, like, at what point are you willing to kind of pull back the throttle? Where do you start to see leverage in the model? Are we two years out, three years out? How do you think about the long-term commitment to shareholders on returning to a positive bottom line?
spk01: I'll start on the new side. So we're seeing a modest improvement in contribution from new deals. So of the thousands of new transactions that happen every quarter, you know, we're starting to see some evidence. I think we had 20 advanced deals, or 20% of the new advanced deals were to new customers. So they're really, the average is still, while it's up 15, 20% year on year, it's still a sub $2,000 figure. So it's not a huge contribution. And we expect that to remain very speedboat-like in terms of the lands. Pete? You want to add some color on the second half of that question?
spk00: Yeah. So, Brett, you know, you asked the question about off margins. So let's start with sort of how we think of profitability. That's the broader question you're asking. When I think of profitability, you know, free cash flow and billings are sort of your leading indicator, Brett. And then off margin and revenue are the ones that lag, right? So we've guided on free cash flow to be sort of minus 1 to minus 2%. It's an improvement from where we exited this year at minus 4. And if I go and I sort of, I'm not giving guidance for FY24, but if I take current scores and speed and I assume macro stays the way it is, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume that we would be free cash flow positive in FY24. Now, the flip end of your question is what about off-margin? So because revenue lags, you should think of off-margin as following in periods after that is the way I would think of it. Did I answer your question?
spk14: Yeah, and I guess you're not given the quota carrying ads, but when you think about if you bucketed the international business sales and brand awareness, what Is the bulk of this going into sales, so 60% into sales, 20% international, brand awareness to the other 20? How would you put the incremental bucket? Is there an easy way to explain that to all of us?
spk00: Yeah, I would say that the biggest, in rank order, the biggest number is in field capacity. And within the field capacity, you should think it's across the board, but there's a slightly higher weighting towards international and as well as to enterprise co-occurrence. So think enterprise field capacity. So think of that as your first element. In smaller magnitude, then you've got awareness. So you think of awareness as being mid-funnel, top-funnel, getting people to sort of know who Smartsheet is and be aware of who we are. And then the smallest number of that is the T&EP. or the portion that's come about as a result of in-person resumption. So whether customer events like Engage, which we'll host this year, or it's field enablement activities like a sales kickoff we just launched.
spk03: Great. Thanks for the call. Thanks, Brent.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Arjun Bhatia with William Blair. Your line is open.
spk07: Hi everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. This is Jake on for origin. So it sounds like top of funnel activity has never actually been stronger, but just kind of curious how much of this is driven by more category awareness versus the introduction of the pro skew, which could actually remove friction from initial customer adoption. And then just on that front, how are you approaching investments in customer onboarding and success teams as that size of the funnel continues to increase?
spk01: I think with every card that comes out of the chute in terms of what we're able to do in moving people up the curve and improving that LTV to CAC, it gives you more and more confidence in investing early for the right profile opportunity. I would say in terms of how we weight the top of funnel, mid funnel, and the pro plan, I think the pro plan had immediate response when we had multiple sort of releases in the last two quarters. I would say the investments we deployed in the second half and as we make these investments in Q1 and Q2, there will be a bit of a delay on that. I think the pro plan packaging had, again, almost an instant overnight response. So I do expect those both to contribute significantly this year. And in terms of how we're applying the resource, the more we see people expanding beyond seats, expansion and into these other higher value areas, the more we say we think we can maximize it with an assisted motion. So, again, we're only 500 to 600 advanced deals into it. We have well over 100,000 customers. There's a lot of opportunity to put really capable people out there. And, again, with every quarter that passes, I think we refine how we deploy that capital.
spk07: That's great. And then just as a follow-up, so net retention, obviously – continues to be best in class kind of thinking about the expectation for next year how should we bifurcate that between obviously you're still growing into a massive market with seed expansions but also you're starting to see a lot of robust adoption for advanced so thinking about people actually climbing on the platform how should we think about the delta between those and how you're approaching your fiscal 23 guidance
spk00: Our guidance, as we gave you for billings, was 37% to 40%. It contemplates sort of an extension of the things we've been successful at. If you start thinking about advance, you know, we've done about 550 deals this year. We're expecting that to sort of continue into the next fiscal year. Think of it broader in terms of not just advance, but capabilities as a part for product suite. That's what's built in. The second part of what you were asking was around sort of how do we visualize the net dollar retention rate? You know, if you think of this market we're going after, we think the number is going to be bigger than 130 for next year. And it sort of contemplates the fact that, you know, we're going to get customers of different sizes. They're going to have different models of how they expand. But we're really bullish on the expansion potential that we have. And being an industry leader today with expansions, we think that trend continues.
spk07: Great. Thanks for taking my questions, and congrats again on the great quarter. Of course.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Scott Berg with Needham. Your line is open.
spk11: Hi, everyone. Congrats on the good quarter, and thanks for taking my questions. I guess I have two. Hopefully, they're generally pretty quick. The first one is on the replacement that you called out, Mark. I think it was Alex that mentioned it earlier. First time on a public call with How much of that is replacing a vendor just because their platform doesn't handle the scale moving from, I don't know, 10 seats to 100 seats or to 1,000 versus some of the capabilities, premium capabilities that you all have added over the last couple of years?
spk01: I think displacement is easiest when there's tremendous pain felt within a customer situation. So when there's breakage and they can't move past go, that's a problem. and that they are forced to change, you have other opportunities where you may see another player in there within a node, a small node, and they may see some synergies, some benefits, administration, what have you, security benefits. But when there's breakage or they're unable to proceed, that's the most pronounced. In this case, it was more of a breakage situation. The account that I mentioned on the call, which talked about those $14,000, $50,000-plus expansions, we expanded around another CWM player. And it's just a fascinating case of that other vendor being within one team and we are sprouting all over that company right now. And in that case, we may not displace that one node, but we're going to be in like 14 other nodes. And so it's, it's never quite as there's not one pattern that we follow and you basically read and react to the situation. But again, uh, When people tap out and they cannot scale or they cannot proceed, those are, I would say, the most straightforward replacements.
spk11: Got it. Helpful. And then, Pete, from a follow-up perspective, your share-based compensation expense increased greatly in fiscal 22 over 21, much faster than the rate of revenue growth. Your guidance for 23 implies that that – kind of growth rate in share-based comp accelerates even further to about, that's going to be up about 75% year-over-year, according to my math. Why such an expansion around share-based comp? It seems to be kind of an outside outlier, but also kind of, you know, I think there's some concern that there's some commonality between that and maybe some of the excess sales marketing spend that you all are going to spend this year. Thank you.
spk00: So, Scott, let's break your question into two parts. First, 22 over 21, and then we can sort of talk a little bit in direction about 23. So, you know, the reason the stock-based compensation expense goes up is because, first of all, you know, you're replacing people whose grants four years ago were at a fairly low strike price, and you're replacing that with personnel where the strike price is much higher. you're adding significant number of people to the equation. Like, as we've grown, we've added, you know, 600 people net this year. All of that becomes a part of the narrative on why stock-based compensation, FY22, is significantly sort of higher, as you stated, than FY21. Now, in FY23, the same trend, we talked about adding sort of what I call field capacity. This is going to be, in large part, personnel. You know, when we're adding people into the equation, we're adding people field roles and field sort of capabilities to take our customers to the next level. This is going to come with basically a stock-based comp that goes with it.
spk11: Excellent. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats.
spk00: Thanks, Scott.
spk08: Your next question comes from the line of Rishi Jaluria with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk02: Wonderful. Hey, Mark, Aaron, thanks so much for taking my questions. Nice to see continued momentum in the business. I guess starting out, I wanted to double-click on the investments incrementally that you're making in driving more market awareness. Can you be a little bit more specific about kind of the areas that you intend to invest, you know, what you're hoping to drive in terms of market awareness? And, you know, is that, you know, specific parts within organizations, specific types of customers? Or is this more broad-based that you're trying to go after? And I've got a follow-up.
spk01: Yes, we really split it across three phases of the game. We have our top funnel, we have our mid-funnel, we have our bottom part of the funnel. And when I look at the opportunity, as I spoke earlier, to call it single-digit percentage penetration within our largest accounts, The opportunity is not just to put a lure in the water on an expensive auction model PPC to get the next fish. It's how do you present yourself to the companies where you already have significant presence, where you have a really good set of use cases. So ABM is a big part of that. And again, that's like tailored ABM. So when we look at looking at the 90% penetration we have in the Fortune 1, so many in the Fortune 5, it's very, very specific marketing into those areas. I think there's opportunity also outside of the PPC realm, which is in content that is really helping customers understand how they can apply CWM and digital asset management to their businesses. And those have yielded really well for us over the years. I think the other areas around the events that Pete spoke to, you know, we've been two years now in the COVID world. We're very much looking forward to our in-person event kicking off again this fall. We plan to have Engage in person. We expect that to be a very large event. Customers have been asking about it. We just had our sales kick off, which was amazing. We're really looking forward to that in the second half of the year as well. But again, I think the takeaway on the marketing side is when you look at the investments we've made domestically, we are now looking to pair that with really smart international investments. So when we're talking about setting up the team in Germany and getting it in Japan, it's not just put people there. It's have the same type of support mechanisms, top, mid, and low funnel, to make sure those people are successful. So I would say the balanced attack we have next year, domestic and international, that's really sort of a signature point on the investment strategy.
spk02: All right, wonderful. That's really helpful. And then just going back to the topic that everyone was talking about on the call, which is the competitive displacement. You know, Mark, you gave the example of, you know, a customer where there was another competitor and you kind of grew up around them. Is that indicative of what you've seen? And again, I know it's a narrow part of the business, but this is something new that we're hearing about. You know, is that more indicative of it or are there actually... you know, existing customers where, you know, maybe one department was using a competitor, other departments were using Smartsheet, and it was more of a consolidation on let's do everything on Smartsheet type way. Thanks.
spk01: Yeah, those situations do happen occasionally. But when you look at where you get the return on your time, the return on your time in trying to knock someone out of one node versus landing in 14 nodes around that one, the return is fantastic on the 14th. And we're confident that over time, when you do become the dominant brand within a large company, and you can point to all these business units, eventually it will tip you away entirely. But again, I don't think the best return on capital is to try and replace that one if there, again, isn't breakage occurring. If they're moving along happily in that one area, let it be and just land everywhere else and grow like mad.
spk02: That's really helpful. Thank you so much.
spk08: Yeah. Your next question comes from the line of Keith Backman with Bank of Montreal. Your line is open.
spk06: Many thanks. And I'm going to ask my questions concurrently since they are related. Pete, to start with you, can you help us bridge to 10% in FY25 free cash flow margins, which you provided at your analyst day? In other words, you're guiding to a negative 1% to 2% margins today. Should we just be thinking gradual steps to that? And I know you answered this previously on the bridge to operating income. I'm still not clear what that means. You know, you said it follows revenue and billings. Does that mean if we thought about it's a pretty significant loss, you know, 3X what everybody was expecting, does that mean an FY24, given the billings guide you made, that comes back a little bit more quickly than free cash flow? And my broader, the reason I want to ask these concurrently, Mark, I want to bring it back to you. You've mentioned a couple times that you have single-digit penetration, which you can see by the average dollar per customer. And your competitors are spending a lot of money during the course of what is calendar year 22. Previously, you had established, I think, at a predecessor that you're going to do 20% pre-cash flow margins in 25. At the analyst day, you cut it to 10%. The question is, what do you tell investors if there's concerns a year from now that the free cash flow targets, because you have low penetration, there's great opportunities, the free cash and operating margins targets don't get pushed out again? You haven't generated free cash flow. We go back to 2016, so your company's been around for a while. What comfort can you give to investors that ultimately you will generate meaningful free cash flow if we look out into FY25 and beyond.
spk01: Yeah, let me start and I'll let Pete follow. I think it's really important here not to fall into the average trap. And what I mean by that is when I say single data penetration, I'm not thinking about that account that's approaching eight figures of revenue contribution. So we have some accounts where we are huge, like 100,000 people connected to our platform. When you see that evidence, and you see the ability in the go-to-market motion that can get you there, and you see an LTV to CAC, which is north of 13, you invest in that. If everyone was at 6%, yeah, that'd be a problem. If you had no evidence of being able to climb effectively and efficiently, that would be more of a bold investment posture. But because we are seeing it, because we are seeing record $100,000 deals, record million-dollar customers being established, that is what's giving us on the inside great confidence in leaning forward. Pete?
spk00: So, Keith, taking the sort of your question in two parts and sort of building on what Mark said, there's a clear signal. We have the metrics that support sort of what we're doing very specifically. They're improving year over year, and so we're seeing that. But to your question on free cash flows, you know, first, free cash flows we've seen as a leading indicator because it ties to billings. And the first explanation that you would need is why is free cash flow ahead of off margins? And the reason for that is when you hire a sales team, you get the OPEX, it hits you, you deliver the billings at the end of the year, you're able to collect the cash, but the revenue moves into the next fiscal year. So that's why I'm talking about it as a leading indicator. Now, we've shown that as a leading indicator, we've gone from minus 8% in 21 to minus 4% in 22, and we're guiding to 1% to 2% in 23. Negative. All these are negative numbers, so they're improving. Now, when you look at it and you say, what is this outlook? As I said, I feel comfortable in saying we're not giving a guide, but in FY24, there's, you know, with current speed and course, we should be cash flow positive. Now, the gradient from that point on, we're talking about something in FY25. That's two years out. We're standing by the model we shared with you at the analyst days. Nothing's changing there. We're just showing you some of the other building blocks along the way that gets you there.
spk06: Yeah, I guess just, Mark, to come back, sorry to interject, but if I take your comments, if you still see good growth opportunities, it sounds like, you know, you'll sacrifice margins and free cash flow if you still, you know, see good growth opportunities. So, you know, what I take from your answer on your current penetration rates and growth potential is, as long as that potential is there, then you'll optimize for billings growth even over margins, or perhaps I'm reading too much into your answer.
spk01: Yeah, I think that's precisely what we're doing in this coming year. And I think, so when you think about the opportunity that's ahead of us in this category, this is not the time to be a 20% grower with 20% off margins. This is not the time. And our investment thesis and our desire, our confidence in taking on the field capacity is grounded in the demand we're seeing with new the demand we're seeing within existing, domestically, internationally. I mean, this is, I would say, a diversified, pretty de-risk situation for us. And again, being in my 17th year at the firm now, I've seen a lot. I've seen a lot of demand environments, seen pullbacks, and I have not seen a demand environment like we've seen right now.
spk06: Okay. I will cede the floor. Thank you.
spk08: That is all the time we have for questions. I'd like to turn the call back to Aaron Turner for closing remarks.
spk09: Great. Thank you, Josh. And thank you, everyone, for joining us today, and we'll speak to you again next quarter.
spk08: This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer