This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk06: Good afternoon. My name is Tommy, and I will be your conference operator for today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Southern Company second quarter 2023 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remark, there will be a question and answer session. At that time, if you have a question, please press the 1 by the 4 on your telephone. From the time of the conference, if you reach an operator, you may press the start by the 0. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded today, August 3rd, 2023. I would now like now to turn the call over to Mr. Scott Gamble, Vice President, Investor Relations, and Treasurer. Please go right ahead, sir.
spk00: Thank you, Tommy. Good afternoon, and welcome to Southern Company's second quarter 2023 earnings call. Joining me today are Chris Womack, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company, and Dan Tucker, Chief Financial Officer. Let me remind you we'll be making forward-looking statements today in addition to providing historical information. Various important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, including those discussed in our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, and subsequent filings. In addition, we'll present non-GAAP financial information on this call. Reconciliations to the applicable GAAP measure are included in the financial information we released this morning as well as the slides for this conference call, which are both available on our investor relations website at investor.southerncompany.com. At this time, I'll turn the call over to Chris Womack.
spk05: Thank you, Scott. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for what is such a pivotal and exciting time for our company. As many of you know, on Monday, we announced that Plant Vogel Unit 3 successfully achieved commercial operations. While work remains to bring Unit 4 online, this incredible milestone is something to be celebrated. This decade-plus journey, which involved developing a global supply chain, managing through a global pandemic, tens of thousands of American craft workers and engineers, and millions of labor hours, combined with a group of committed co-owners and regulators that had the courage to support new nuclear power as an option when others didn't, proves that we can accomplish monumental things when we share a common vision. Vogel Unit 3 is now serving Georgia customers with over 1,100 megawatts of 24-hour, seven-day-a-week carbon-free electricity. Turning now to Unit 4. Since our last call, the project team continues to make substantial progress as highlighted by completion of hot functional testing, receipt of all 157 fuel assemblies, submittal of all ITACs, and most recently receipt of the 103G finding from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission signifying that license acceptance criteria for Unit 4 have been met. The project team's current focus is on working through final testing and system turnover to operations that, when complete, will allow fuel load for Unit 4. Recall, as we contemplated in the VCM 17 order, Georgia Power can file its prudence request with the Public Service Commission following fuel load on Unit 4. Following fuel load, the project team will conduct final preparations and testing of systems primarily associated with the electrical power production side of the plant and achieving the pristine conditions in the nuclear island necessary for startup activities and initial criticality. Importantly, the project capital cost forecast is unchanged since last quarter, and we continue to project Unit 4 will be placed in service between late fourth quarter 2023 and the end of the first quarter 2024. The successful completion of this important project is critical for Georgia's and our nation's energy future. We look forward to these units providing reliable, carbon-free energy to customers for decades to come. Dan, I'll now turn the call over to you for a financial update.
spk01: Thanks, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. For the second quarter of 2023, our adjusted earnings were 79 cents per share, 4 cents higher than our estimate, and 28 cents lower than last year. The primary drivers of our performance compared to last year were milder than normal weather conditions, higher depreciation and amortization, and interest expense and changes in rates and pricing somewhat offset by lower income taxes and O&M expenses. A detailed reconciliation of our reported and adjusted results as compared to 2022 is included in today's release and earnings package. Weather in our electric service territories during the first half of 2023 has been the mildest on record. with the fewest aggregate degree days and the 129 year history of climate data reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, more commonly known as NOAA. The negative 16 per share EPS impact relative to our weather normal EPS guidance range is our largest ever negative weather driven variance for the first six months of a year, which is a significant headwind for the full year. While 2022 was the year in which we were able to fix the roof while the sun is shining and position the company well coming into 2023, we have been and will remain keenly focused on cost management, along with our constant focus on safety, reliability, and customer satisfaction in the second half of this year. Our adjusted earnings estimate for the third quarter of 2023 is $1.30 per share. Turning now to retail sales and the economy, Year-to-date 2023, weather normal retail sales were in line with sales levels for the first half of 2022. We've seen positive residential and commercial growth and strong commercial usage offset by lower industrial sales. Year-to-date, we've added nearly 24,000 electric customers and 13,000 natural gas customers, trends which continue to outpace pre-pandemic levels. Chris, I'll now turn the call back over to you.
spk05: Thank you, Dan. In closing, I'd like to take a moment to acknowledge that Southern Company was recently awarded the number nine overall spot on Forbes ranking of America's best employers for women, the highest ranking within our industry. We are honored to be selected to this list once again. Workforce and leadership diversity is a tenant of ours and ensures we have the variety of experiences and perspectives to better serve our customers. We will continue to emphasize a culture where all employees feel valued, respected, and able to accomplish their professional goals. Thank you for joining us this afternoon, and for your interest in Southern Company. Operator, we are now ready to take questions.
spk06: Thank you very much. And we'll proceed with our first question on the line. It's from Shariar Puretza from Guggenheim Partners. Please go right ahead.
spk10: Shariar, good afternoon. Hey, guys. Good morning, Chris. Chris, that was the world record for the fastest prepared remarks, so congrats there on that one.
spk05: Thanks, Sean.
spk10: There you go.
spk05: I always appreciate your comments and your analysis.
spk09: There you go.
spk05: And your perspective.
spk10: Thank you. Just starting on Georgia's economic backdrop, and obviously you guys have seen a step change in the pace that major industrial customers have been announcing this you know, new capacity needs. How many, I guess, new gigawatts are you seeing now in Georgia versus the prior update with the state? What is the prior IRP embed? How should we sort of think about any updates to capacity needs, including the viability of the remaining coal assets as you're thinking about this incremental demand? So could we see a drastically different IRP being filed? Thanks.
spk05: And Char, we're working through that analysis now. I think we have said to you before, and we've commented about all the wonderful economic development activity that we've seen across the state of Georgia over the past couple of years, some 250 plus projects, some 20 plus billion dollars of investment, some 60,000 jobs that I know the governor has reported. So I think, you know, we've talked about the impressive activity that we've seen. We've not turned that into the capacity needs at this time. That's some work that we're doing. And I'm sure forthcoming we'll work with the commission on what all that means and then figure out what it means for us in terms of capacity needs going forward.
spk01: But I think it's a little bit premature. Again, we're kind of going through the analysis, but it's fair to say what we've seen from an economic development announcement perspective in the past is hundreds of megawatts at a maximum in a given year. And now we're having instances where it's thousands, potentially, in terms of the announcements. And so just the pace has accelerated. And you mentioned industrial. There's certainly a lot of large industrials involved with that, particularly around the electric transportation sector. But it's also data centers. You know, it's a story that's playing out in a lot of places. Just as an example for ours, I mean, as we sit here today, data centers are roughly 2.5% of our overall electric load
spk05: five years from now that will be well into the double digits in terms of percentage of our load that that's the pace of growth we're seeing so i think bottom line is yeah no i think something we're very excited about no we're very excited about it i think it's a real positive contribution positive factor uh that we're excited about here in the state do you have a sense chris on when you and kim and dan and the team could update us around that potential opportunity
spk10: I know it's really early in the process, but we're obviously seeing the amount of customers that are moving to Texas, and it's very material. I mean, to Georgia, which is really material, so I'm just kind of curious on what the timing of that could be.
spk05: Yeah, sure. I think it's a little bit premature, but as soon as we get to that point and we figure out and have a conversation with the commission, I'm sure we'll share that with you, share that with the industry.
spk10: Okay, perfect. And then lastly, Chris, we're obviously approaching, you know, the prudency case once we see Unit 4 fuel load. Anything you can provide and how we should be thinking about a potential settlement or should we be thinking about this as like a rate case and whether the potential for like a special election could impact the process, if at all, especially if fuel load takes longer than planned?
spk05: Yeah, Charles, I think there are a couple of questions you embedded there together. First around prudence, we have to get the fuel load. Once we get the fuel load, we'll figure out what happens. Having transparency in the process is very important, but right now, once we get the fuel load, then we'll figure that out. We'll work with the commission and the staff on that process. I think you made reference to the makeup of the commission. The sense is that we'll get through prudence with the current commission. We have no idea what will happen in in the Rose case, so we're still waiting for that order, for that decision by the courts, but there's nothing more I can say about that decision at this point in time.
spk10: Okay, perfect. Thank you, Chris and Dan. Very helpful. I appreciate it, and congrats.
spk06: Thank you. Thanks, sir. And we'll get to our next question on the line. It is from Carly Davenport with Goldman Sachs. Please go right ahead.
spk09: Hey, Carly.
spk06: Carly, how are you?
spk03: Doing well. Thanks so much for taking the questions today. Appreciate it. Maybe just starting in terms of what we saw during the quarter for weather normalized demand, you know, a little bit weaker on the industrial side, but commercial still looks quite strong. Can you just talk about how things are evolving relative to your forecast and kind of how you could see that evolving as we continue to move through the year?
spk01: Yeah, absolutely, Carly. And we saw this earlier this year as well, you know, From an industrial perspective, we're seeing two different dynamics play out that are negatively impacting growth. One is the housing sector. So when it comes to things like lumber, stone, clay, and glass, to a degree textiles, particularly where it involves carpet, just given the broader trends in the housing industry, we're seeing that it impacts some of our usage in the short term. And then the other thing is chemicals from an industrial perspective. So we've had one particular facility in Alabama that has slowed pretty significantly. Again, some of that was anticipated very early in the year, and so it's just playing out as we anticipated. It just wasn't anticipated when we kind of put our forecast together right before the end of the year. What we're really encouraged by is what we're seeing on the commercial and residential side. You know, I spoke to the customer growth that we're seeing from a residential perspective. Again, we've seen sustained levels well above what we were seeing pre-pandemic. And from a commercial perspective, just a lot of different stories playing out in that regard. Some of it's economic development, some of it's this data center dynamic that I mentioned, and certainly a lot of it is just commercial naturally following the residential growth. As it pertains to how it's impacting our results, you know, what's important to remember is kind of the the revenue contribution of these two classes on a relative basis. A 1% change in industrial sales is only about $20 million of impact, whereas a 1% change in residential commercial is more like $40 to $50 million. So in terms of a net implication for us, we're getting the benefit of the residential commercial more than offsetting what we're seeing on industrial.
spk03: Got it. That's super helpful. Thank you. And then maybe just on the financing front, in the context of the current rate environment, you've got some financing kind of still outstanding for the rest of this year. Just how are you thinking about execution of the plan that you have as we move through 23?
spk01: Yeah, Carly, look, we're always going to kind of keep our options open. The flexibility you've seen us, you know, do the convertible debt instrument early this year. We typically lean, you know, on an ongoing basis toward just senior unsecured stuff with a parent. a lot of different instruments we've used across the utility franchises. I wouldn't characterize anything in our plans as out of the ordinary. We're going to be monitoring the market and making sure we're being thoughtful about, as we always are, maturities, about the mix between fixed and variable, and like everyone's doing, monitoring the rates as actively as we can to make sure we're getting to the market when it makes sense.
spk03: I appreciate the caller. Thank you.
spk01: You bet, Carly. Thank you.
spk06: And we'll get to our next question on the line. It is from Julian Dumoulin-Smith from Bank of America. Go right ahead. Julian.
spk09: Hey, good afternoon, team. Thanks for the time. Hey, great. Thanks so much. Really appreciate it. Hey, look, just coming back to the other subject here on procurement and renewables on the renewables front. I know we talked about this last quarter here. Curious to hear your latest thoughts both on the utility side and ownership. I think that had always been kind of back after this year. How's that looking on that front in Georgia? And then separately, I think, Dan, last time we connected here, you were talking about the Southern Power effort looking like it was a tad bit more competitive in this environment. in terms of your ability to actually win and accrue projects on that side of the house. You want to talk about some of the progress and maybe the evolution just with the rate environment where it is?
spk05: Yeah, Julian, let me start on the renewables front. As you know, in the 22 IRP, Georgia had another 2,100 megawatts of renewables approved during that proceeding. The first IRP would begin later this year. targeting some 1300 megawatts renewable resources with operation dates between 26 and 27. I think you may have also seen Alabama Power got its renewable generation certification modified some 2400 megawatts over a six year period. So I think that will also be later this year. So we're proceeding and we're looking forward to opportunities for us to own some renewables Clearly, we'll take advantage of the normalization of tax treatment between PTCs and ITCs and pursuing it from a best cost perspective. And we think we've got support from our commissions for us to own more renewables. So we're looking forward to those processes as they proceed later this year. I think your other question, Dan, you want to talk about pricing?
spk01: Well, I think the other question was around Southern Power. Yes, Southern Power. Yeah, Julian, the same continues to hold true. The radar screen of active, viable opportunities for Southern Power is as strong as it's ever been. And look, we fully expect to be able to continue to deploy capital in the right way there. We'll keep the same discipline we've always had in terms of the hurdles we look for, the risk profile, long-term contracts, credit where the counterparty, but I think my short message there on Southern Power would just be stay tuned. There's good things happening.
spk05: So bottom line, Julian, I think we're very optimistic on the regulated side of what the future holds for renewables, and we'll see how that plays out, begin to play out later this year.
spk09: Got it. Excellent. And then just as you think about the generation needs that the prior questioners have been really kind of poking at here, aligned with, as you alluded to a second ago, the added ability to own some of this renewable generation through utility tax credit optimization, if you will. Can you talk about that opportunity coming together and maybe specifically the timeline that you could see that starting to play itself out? I know we just alluded to the prior IRP cycle, but getting the CapEx proposals, RFPs, and ultimately just seeing that loaded forecast updated.
spk05: Yeah, Julie, once again, I think it's a little premature in that regard. As I spoke to you earlier about the renewable process and the RFPs, we see that forthcoming later this year. Clearly, we've got some more work to do as we analyze the implications of this economic development activity and what it means for loads. And so we simply right now need to let the RFP process play out. over the next few months and next few years. But we'll keep you updated as we move through the process.
spk01: Yeah, as we've said before, you know, what Chris just said, this will come together from a plan and capital deployment perspective in the latter part of our forecast horizon. So it's not a 23 thing in terms of capital deployment. Might, but probably not a meaningful 24 thing. But beyond that is where the real opportunity exists. And the other thing that's coming together to help drive this, and I think you mentioned the economic development aspect, Julian, as all these customers are choosing to locate in our service territories, they are increasingly demanding to be served with renewable generation, and that's just helping support everything we're trying to do.
spk09: Yeah, I hear you. Wish you guys the best of luck, and I hope to see you guys soon. All right, take care.
spk06: All right, Julian. Thank you very much. We'll get to our next question on the line. It is from Jeremy Tonnet with J.P. Morgan. Go right ahead.
spk07: Hi, good afternoon.
spk06: Good afternoon.
spk07: Thanks. Just wanted to see, I guess, with starting off Vogel here, some of the issues at the finish line here. Just wondering what learnings you take away from that, and do you see the same type of issues materializing for Unit 4, or are there learnings here that can kind of head off into issues like that?
spk05: And, Jeremy, one of the things we've commented for, you know, we've said it probably for a few years now, that there would be lessons learned if we transfer over from Unit 3 to Unit 4. Let me give you some examples of how that is playing out. On Unit 3, hot functional testing took 94 days. On Unit 4, it took 88 days. From 94, it took 42 days. Hot functional testing to complete to 103G was 371 days on Unit 3, 88 days on Unit 4. And from cold hydro to hot functional test start was 191 days on Unit 3. to 103 days on Unit 4. So I think you're seeing clear examples of how lessons are being learned from Unit 3 over to Unit 4. And that work, those lessons learned, will continue, I think, to show itself as we move through Unit 4.
spk07: Got it. That's helpful there. Thanks. And just kind of pivoting here, I think I saw that the D.C. Corps overruled FERC's approval of the Southeast Energy Exchange market. What do you make of this here, and what's the path forward?
spk05: Yeah, I mean, it remanded it back to FERC to clarify a couple of issues around the power pool. And there were some questions about, you know, who could participate in SIEM and seeing there has to be interconnections. So I think they're simply remanded back for clarification of a couple of issues, but nothing big there. I mean, SIEM continues to operate and perform very well. Everybody's very pleased with the results of SIEM. So it's going to be remanded back to FERC, like I said, with a couple of issues that they'll clarify for SIEM going forward.
spk07: Got it. That's helpful. Thanks. And just last one, if I could. What are you expecting on hydrogen regs from Treasury? And what do you think Southern Power's potential to participate could be with Vogel, the potential for green hydrogen here?
spk05: Let me say something quickly about hydrogen. Now that Dan touched on any rules from Treasury, we're participating in a number of processes DOE has with Hydrogen Hub, so we're excited about that. As you may recall, we did a 20% blend at our Platte McDonough gas site. So we're excited about all the technology activity and the considerations that are going on around hydrogen. You know, we look forward to seeing if we can develop this market, get the pricing right, get the transportation of the product right, and then we can find off-takers. I mean, so we're thrilled by the possibility and how Vogel can continue to serve customers in Georgia's hope. There are a lot of aspects of hydrogen that we get real excited about, including there's a lot of work that we've got to work through to get to that point to make it commercially viable.
spk01: Yeah, and Jeremy, in terms of the Treasury reg, certainly like most in the industry, I think for us it makes sense that those are as broad as possible going in to help kind of drive the deployment of the technology. Otherwise, it just may be cost prohibitive for a lot of people to get it out there. And whether that's a permanent broadness or it's a temporary broadness that transitions to something more specific, I think that's going to be in the hands of the Treasury Group. In terms of Southern Power's opportunity to play there, certainly Southern Power's wheelhouse is providing utility scale renewable generation to And to the extent that we find opportunities in this space to serve an electrolyzer or another entity with a long-term contract, and it's a credit-worthy counterparty, and it meets all of the same criteria, it certainly expands our universe of opportunities.
spk07: Got it. That's helpful. I'll leave it there. Thanks.
spk06: Thank you. And we'll get to our next question on the line. It is from David Arcaro with Morgan Stanley. Go right ahead.
spk01: Hey, Dave.
spk06: How are you, David?
spk11: Hey, doing well. Thanks for taking my questions. You know, wondering if you might be able to touch a little bit on form energy. You had an agreement reached at Georgia Power this quarter. I was wondering how you're thinking long-duration energy storage might play a role in your system over time.
spk05: Once again, we're excited about the relationship that we've established with FORM. We have utilized the kind of four- to six-hour batteries, but we think a 100-hour long-duration storage battery, some 15 megawatts, has got to be a part of the mix and has got to be a part of the system and the grid going forward. So we're excited about what FORM is doing. We were at their groundbreaking ribbon-cutting up in West Virginia last a month or so ago, so we are excited about FORM and looking forward to their development as we go forward, but we think this has got to be part of the technology mix as we go forward, and we're hoping they're going to be successful. As you know, we pay a lot of attention to research and development, and we think as we look at a lot of solutions, whether it's emissions control or just making sure we maintain a reliable and resilient grid. We think technology advancement is very, very critical, and so we're excited about the work that Forum is doing, and we're glad to partner with them.
spk11: Great. That makes sense. And then secondly, you know, obviously a big weather headwind that you're working through, and could you touch on the cost control? just your confidence level in being able to manage and find flex in your O&M budget for this year? And where are the key areas that you're looking at in terms of offsetting the headwind so far?
spk05: Yeah, I think, and Dan said it in the conversation early on, that we'll remain keenly focused on cost management. And so we know the weather we've seen is unprecedented. It's the the lowest, the warmest we've seen in history. And so we've got to correspond with that with similar focus on cost management. And so there are a number of efforts going on across the company to make sure that we are executing around cost management controls. And right now we feel good about kind of where we are, but we know we've got a lot more work to do as we go forward through the rest of the year.
spk11: Okay, understood. Congratulations on Volvo Unit 3, and thanks again. Appreciate it.
spk06: Thank you very much. Thank you. We'll get to our next question on the line. It is from Durgas Chopra with Evercore ISI. Go right ahead.
spk08: Hey, good afternoon, guys. Hey, good afternoon, Dan. Seven minutes and 58 seconds of prepared remarks. I'll keep it real brief, hopefully. Just following up on David's question, So this quarter we had $0.04 of unfavorable weather versus normal, but you actually delivered $0.04 higher than your estimate. Is that all just cost cuts, or are there other things that we should think about, one-time orders and other things?
spk01: Yeah, it's primarily cost reductions, Durgesh. I mean, you know, there's always some little puts and takes here and there that are a little different than our forecast, but overall it's just the fruit of our labor. And kind of going back to Dave's original question in terms of where – Frankly, it would be doing a disservice to highlight any particular area of the business where we're doing that because we're doing it everywhere. You know, this is a significant lift, and we're, you know, doing everything we need to do and pulling out all the stops to deliver.
spk08: Okay, solid. And then just maybe if you can, otherwise I'll just follow up with Scott, just any sort of initial takes on July weather?
spk01: It hasn't looked like the first half.
spk08: Okay. Thanks so much. Appreciate the time.
spk06: Thank you. Thank you very much. We'll get to our next question on the line. It's from Nick Campanella from Barclays. Go right ahead.
spk04: Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. Hope you're doing well, and congrats on the Unit 3 news. Thanks, Nick. Yeah, absolutely. So just looking forward to you know, Unit 4 soon and then, you know, knowing that we're getting closer to that $700 million uplift that you've detailed in slides here on the CFO. Dan, maybe you can just remind us, you know, your preferred use of those cash flows as you roll forward your plan in the fourth quarter. And I know we talked about improving balance sheet in the past, but I'm also cognizant you're talking up a lot of different CapEx opportunities in your region.
spk01: Yeah, and thanks for that question. It really is a kind of, all of the above strategy, if you will, in terms of the opportunity to use this cash. And it's the three things that we're primarily focused on. You said one, which is to fund the capital plan, right? So we'll be positioned, as we had been historically, kind of pre-penalty ROEs and heavy construction on VOGO 3 and 4, where our operating cash flow represents over three times the size of our common dividend. And so that leaves an awful lot of cash flow to deploy against this, you know, capital plan that we expect to continue to grow. So that's thing one, the number one priority of the things we're focused on. You also mentioned this is credit quality. And what this does is provide an uplift to our credit metrics such that, you know, we're more in the 17, 17 plus range for FFO to debt. And the, opportunity there is not to raise it to these levels well above our thresholds and then use that as some sort of currency to do things. That's the opportunity to just once again get back to being a premium credit utility and maintaining that position for the foreseeable future. So that's thing two. And then the third thing that we've talked a lot about is the opportunity that we'll have as our payout ratio is gets kind of sustainably at or maybe a little below 70%, so call that maybe 2024, but more likely 2025, an opportunity to go to our board and for Chris and I to make a recommendation to increase the rate of the dividend growth to be more aligned with our earnings growth. So it's, again, all of the above, but really important things that this enables us to do.
spk04: All right. Thanks for that. That's it for me today. Appreciate it.
spk01: Thank you.
spk06: I'll get to our next question on the line. Here's from Angie with Seaport. Go right ahead.
spk02: Angie, how are you? Very good, thanks. So just, you know, you guys have been in this combat mode for the last, well, for a decade almost, it feels like. And I know that there's still the Prudence Review ahead of you, but I'm just trying to picture Southern in a back to basics mode. So, I mean, what does it even look like? So that's one. And number two is, I mean, you clearly, the stock has re-rated somewhat. What is it that you think you can do? Well, besides just putting Unit 4 online to further re-rate the stock from here?
spk05: And, Andrew, let me start with the first part of your question in terms of being in combat mode during this vogal period. I'd say we're going to stay in combat mode in terms of execution. Yeah, hopefully we're going to be a little boring. We think boring is beautiful. But we're going to be incredibly aggressively focused on customers being at the center of everything that we do, focused on the circle of life. making sure we're maintaining a constructive regulatory environment, providing world-class service, and using your language of in combat mode, but doing that in a very aggressive way that makes sure we're giving customers what they need from a reliability but also a resilient perspective, but also making sure we're paying attention to issues around affordability. So we have a lot of work to do, and so we're going to be very singly focused on execution And I think that's going to be very important as we also make the case that we deserve that premium valuation and returning back to the days of old Southern Classic.
spk01: It is no mistake and no accident that the first page of our deck has Circle of Life on it.
spk02: Okay. And then just maybe a smaller point, but, you know, you guys – have, you know, just like everybody else, more violent and impactful storms going through your service territory. Is there anything from one investment perspective to regulatory setup that could help you, you know, harden the grid and also assure timely recovery of any costs associated with those, with the climate change, basically?
spk05: And I would say, I mean, if you look at our capital budgets today and I mean, getting past Vogel, there are no really large projects, but it's a lot of blocking and tackling with transmission distribution, with grid improvement programs, with undergrounding, with changing out circuits and improving technology, SCADA systems. So a lot of that work to enhance and improve reliability, but also improve resiliency so that storms are more different, paying attention to more extreme weather. So doing the basic work to prepare for these kind of conditions and help us to maintain our focus on reliability and the resiliency of our system. Great. Thank you.
spk06: Thank you very much. Thank you, Andy. And that will conclude today's question and answer session. Sir, are there any closing remarks?
spk05: Hey, once again, let me thank everybody for your calls today. It's a a wonderful time for Southern Company as we brought Unit 3 commercial and with the progress that we're making on Unit 4, and we'll continue to press ahead and move forward. But again, thank everybody for joining us today. Thank you very much, and everybody be safe.
spk06: Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the Southern Company second quarter 2023 earnings call. You may now disconnect and have a great rest of the day.
Disclaimer