This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk05: Greetings and welcome to STEM Inc. First Quarter 2024 Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Ted Durbin, Head of Investor Relations. Thank you, Mr. Durbin. You may begin.
spk13: Thank you, Operator. This is Ted Durbin, Head of Investor Relations at STEM. Welcome to our first quarter 2024 earnings call. Before we begin, please note that some of the statements we will be making today are forward-looking. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. We therefore refer you to our latest 10Q and other SEC filings. Our comments today also include non-GAAP financial measures. Additional details and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in our earnings release. We will be using a slide presentation today. Our earnings release and presentation are on the investor relations section of our website at www.stem.com. John Carrington, our CEO, and Bill Bush, CFO, will start the call today with prepared remarks. Rakesh Patel, Chief Strategy Officer, will also be available for the question and answer portion of the call. And now I'll turn the call over to John.
spk08: Thanks, Ted. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us today. Beginning with slide three in our agenda, we will cover our first quarter results, product announcements, and business updates. Then Bill will discuss our financial results in greater detail. Now let's turn to slide four on our first quarter 2024 results and highlights. We continue to execute on our three guiding principles in the first quarter. We delivered record non-GAAP gross margin and near break-even performance on operating cash flow. We also accelerated our pace of annual recurring revenue activations. And finally, we launched another software-only product offering. We're on a solid foundation to continue delivering against our financial targets for the full year 2024. In the first quarter, we recorded $25 million in revenue, down 62% versus first quarter 2023. Revenue this quarter was negatively impacted by a $33 million adjustment as a result of some legacy contract guarantees from 2022 and the first half of 2023, which were further impacted by accelerating market conditions, including extended project timelines and declining battery prices. It's important to note this change had no impact on our cash flows in the quarter and as a result of a legacy contract structure, which as previously committed, we have not offered such guarantees to customers since the first half of 2023. We achieved our record non-GAAP gross margin of 24% this quarter due to a higher mix of software and services revenue. In particular, our high margin solar revenue was up 16% year over year and storage software wins drove AUM of 66% year over year. GAAP gross profit was negative $24 million, primarily driven by the net revenue reduction. Bookings in the first quarter were $24 million. As a result of our expansion to large-scale front-of-the-meter storage projects, the timing of our bookings has become increasingly variable on a near-term basis. Our average project size has tripled over the past two years, and we have had a substantial number of projects in advanced stages of negotiations or that are expected to close in the near term. Given this strong commercial momentum, we remain confident in achieving our $1.5 to $2 billion bookings target for the full year 2024. Contracted annual recurring revenue, or CAR, was up 25% versus the first quarter of 2023. In the quarter, we implemented a proactive effort to upgrade the backlog to focus on the most profitable opportunities which caused a slight reduction to CAR. This underscores our unwavering focus on driving cash flow generation against our full-year target of more than $50 million for 2024. Adjusted EBITDA came in at a negative $12.2 million versus negative $13.7 million in the same quarter last year, excluding the impact of the revenue adjustments. Adjusted EBITDA improved despite a lower revenue base compared to the prior year. reflecting our focus on operating efficiency and gross margin improvement. And lastly, operating cash flow is roughly breakeven this quarter, a $35 million improvement over the same quarter last year. We are updating our revenue guidance solely to reflect the non-cash adjustment and otherwise reaffirming our guidance across our key metrics, including $5 to $20 million of adjusted EBITDA and more than $50 million of operating cash flow for the full year of 2024. Importantly, we are confident that we can achieve these goals and continue to grow our business without the need for additional equity issuance. Bill will provide more details on our financial results later in the call. We're also announcing today our next generation PowerTrack Asset Performance Management Suite for clean energy portfolios. Let's go to slide five for a deeper dive into this new and exciting product. The PowerTrack APM Suite is a software solution for centralizing and streamlining the management of storage, solar, and hybrid energy asset portfolios. It will help customers understand the commercial impact of technical decisions and the technical impact of commercial strategies. so they can more effectively manage risks and drive enhanced returns. Powertrack APM was built by experts in the storage and solar industry on a dual foundation of STEM's industry-leading solar asset monitoring software, Powertrack, and the company's award-winning Athena AI for energy storage forecasting and optimization. This solution was built for purpose in collaboration with many of our closest customers providing feedback on gaps in currently available alternatives. Some highlights on Powertrack APM. This product will continuously monitor the health of individual assets, holistically track commercial performance of a portfolio and individual sites, automatically manage energy storage warranty obligations, streamline operations center processes, and finally, measure commercial impacts of technical events to minimize risk and drive returns. PowerTrack APM will be released to select beta customers starting this summer, and we will generally be available at the end of the year. We have already received strong interest from existing and new customers for a comprehensive tool like this, which we believe does not currently exist in the market. For STEM, this offering will drive additional high-margin solar revenue, expand our addressable market, and allow for deployments on existing operating assets. The last point is important. Because by targeting existing assets, we can avoid the protracted permitting and interconnection cycles impacting the broader renewable sector. This is fully aligned with our objective of accelerating our CAR to ARR conversion. As we outlined in our last call, there's approximately $65 million of annual gross profit embedded in the full year 2024 CAR. Now, moving to slide six for an update on our progress against our guiding principles. As a reminder, in 2024, we're focused on three key items, cash flow generation, building software and services revenue, and extending our technology leadership position. First, our operating cash flow continues to improve, up $1.5 million versus the fourth quarter of last year, and by $35 million versus the first quarter of 2023. We made excellent progress on reducing our working capital intensity this quarter as well. Second, our software revenue grew meaningfully this quarter, up 4% for solar and up 6% for storage versus the fourth quarter of last year. Our outlook for software and services revenue growth remains positive, due in part to customer logos you see in the middle of the page. We're also making good progress in converting our car to annual recurring revenue, or ARR. As the chart in the middle of the page illustrates, Our expectation of storage ARR activation has improved materially since the beginning of the year. That improvement is partially driven by new software-only contracts. The improvement in ARR activation is also driven by better processes, as our team leverages our experience to help customers accelerate product timelines in the front of the meter market. We have also streamlined our interaction with our OEM partners, resulting in faster resolution of field commissioning issues. While our interconnection and permitting approval timelines remain protracted, our customer cancellation rate are in the low single digits, which translates into a high confidence in continued expected software revenue growth. Our focus on the municipal and cooperative market is also paying dividends. For example, the first sites of our 313 megawatt Our storage project with Amoresco will go live in May and will generate a significant uptick in recurring software revenue. The offtaker for this project is a cooperative in Colorado, and the timeframe from booking to first software revenue will be inside 12 months for this deal, much faster than our typical FTM cycle. This validates our focus on public power market and should accelerate ARR conversion going forward. Finally, we continue to extend our technology leadership position with software-only offerings, as evidenced by our recent product launches over the last several months, as I detailed in the prior slide. With that, I'll turn the call over to Bill.
spk15: Thanks, John. Starting on page 8 with our results for the first quarter of 2024. As John mentioned, revenue in the quarter was negatively impacted by an approximately $33 million non-cash adjustment as the result of battery hardware price guarantees we made to gain a foothold in the public power and large front-of-the-meter markets. These contracts gave customers certain price protection on their hardware purchases. Since we entered into those contracts in late 2022 and the first half of 2023, interconnection timeframes have extended in key markets, while the price of lithium-ion batteries has fallen significantly in 2024 due to the impact of new manufacturing supply entering the market. As a result, the price protection provisions resulted in additional non-cash adjustments to the revenue tied to those projects. In the third quarter of 2023, we adjusted our revenue based on estimates of the non-cash variable consideration embedded in those contracts. Given the protracted project timelines and decline in battery prices, we have updated our estimate of the non-cash variable consideration, which had the effect of reducing our revenue by an additional $33 million this quarter. Importantly, this adjustment has no impact on our operating cash flow in the current quarter. We have not issued such guarantees since June 2023, and we reiterate our commitment to not issue any hardware price guarantees in the future. We are actively advancing projects under fixed price contracts based on current market conditions that we expect will consume approximately 50% of the remaining batteries subject to these guarantees. We expect that these transactions will close in Q2 and Q3 of this year, and they will not be subject to future adjustment post-close. Overall, these transactions should enable us to convert accounts receivable into cash more quickly, providing us greater confidence in our free cash flow generation goals. Following these transactions and the $33 million adjustment, the remaining batteries subject to guarantees are currently valued at approximately $50 million. We intend to integrate these batteries into projects which we will expect will be available for sale in late second half 2024 and be operational in the second half of 2025. We will continue to evaluate the economics of these transactions based on the then current conditions. To the extent that we are not able to integrate the remaining batteries into future projects or market conditions further deteriorate, we may update our estimates of the non-cash variable consideration embedded in those contracts. This may result in one or more future impairments. As I said in the third quarter of last year, these were exceptional offerings that allowed us to enter and quickly build a leadership position in an attractive market segment where we have executed over a billion dollars in bookings. In addition, we expect that these projects will give us a long-dated revenue stream of high-margin recurring software revenue. And now on to our other financial results. GAAP gross margin was a negative 95% and was down as a result of the non-cash variable consideration adjustment to revenue I described earlier. We achieved record non-GAAP gross margin this quarter of 24% versus 19% in first quarter 2023. The year-over-year increase in non-GAAP gross margin was due to an increased mix of higher margin solar products and more favorable supply costs. Overall solar revenue increased 16% year-over-year And solar revenue was up 15%. Non-GAAP gross margin was adjusted to exclude the impact of the reduction in revenue. Adjusted EBITDA excludes the impact of the reduction in revenue and was a negative $12.2 million in the first quarter, keeping us on track to achieve our EBITDA goal for the full year. We continue to stay disciplined on operating expenses and reaffirm our target cash OPEX as a percentage of revenue for 2024. which we expect to be between 10 and 20%. Finally, operating cash flow was a negative $600,000 representing year over year improvement of $35 million and a sequential improvement of almost $2 million. We continue to improve our working capital management and remain dedicated to generating positive operating cash flow without the need to raise additional equity or equity linked securities. Turning now to slide nine for a look at our operating metrics. Contracted backlog was 1.6 billion at the end of the quarter compared to 1.9 billion at the end of the fourth quarter 2023, representing a 16% sequential decrease. The decrease in the contracted backlog in the quarter was driven by a proactive effort to upgrade the profitability profile of the backlog, focusing resources on the most compelling opportunities. We canceled around $257 million of contracts that were lower margin or expected to utilize working capital based on this review. We realized bookings of 24 million dollars the year over year and sequential decrease in bookings was largely driven by an increased variability on a quarterly basis due to our focus on larger utility scale projects. As underscored by John, we continue to see strong commercial momentum and remain confident in our bookings goal for the year. We reiterate our overall guidance in the 1.5 to 2 billion dollar range and have sufficient pipeline to meet that goal. First quarter 2024 car decreased to $89.3 million, down from $91.0 million as of the end of the fourth quarter 2023, a 2% sequential decrease. The decrease in car was due to the previously mentioned backlog review that resulted in the cancellation of about $3.5 million of annual contract revenue. Storage AUM grew 5% sequentially to 5 gigawatt hours from 5.5 gigawatt hours in the fourth quarter of 2023. solar AUM ended the quarter at 26.9 gigawatts down 600 megawatts sequentially or approximately 2%. As part of the backlog review, we performed a comprehensive review of both storage and solar AUM. That review resulted in a small reduction to the storage AUM that was offset by new bookings in the quarter and a net reduction to solar AUM. Turning now to slide 10 in our 2024 guidance, We are adjusting our full-year revenue guidance downward dollar for dollar with the $33 million reduction in revenue we recognized this quarter. We are refirming our guidance across all other key metrics. And with that, let me turn the call back to John for some closing remarks.
spk08: Thanks, Bill. Wrapping up on slide 11 with our key takeaways. We are building a solid foundation for continued growth. We had strong performance with record non-gap gross margin of 24%. delivered near break-even performance for operating cash flow, and are solidly on the path to our EBITDA target for full year 2024. In addition, we took several actions to enhance the profitability and pace of cash flow generation, including trimming the backlog of lower margin opportunities. I am most excited by the continued strong momentum in our software business with an increase of 42% expected in the conversion of contracted annual recurring revenue for the balance of 2024 as a result of our activities in Q1 2024. This acceleration of ARR activation is a key focus of the organization, and as we highlighted in our prior quarter call, represents a substantial value unlock. At this run rate, there is approximately $65 million of annual gross profit embedded in the full year 2024 CAR. In addition, we continue to add software-only wins, signing up sophisticated renewable asset managers and energy market trading firms. The momentum in our software offerings is augmented by our accelerating pace of new product releases. We announced today the introduction of our next-generation Powertrack Asset Performance Management Suite, which we expect to further build on the strong uptake of our software-only offerings evidenced in the recent release of PowerBidder Pro. We continue to invest in our India Center of Excellence, which is driving enhanced productivity across our software development teams. We expect to continue the rapid pace of new product introductions, cementing our leadership position in the industry. Before I close for questions, I wanted to announce a couple people updates. Lars Johnson, our Chief Technology Officer, retired on April 18th. Lars shared his personal path forward with me almost two years ago, and since then, we've been working together on a succession plan to ensure a smooth transition with a particular focus on our software strategy. We hired Albert Hoffelt to serve as SVP of technology, who has extensive experience in shipping SaaS solutions and, in particular, building robust utility-scale software for next-generation distributed generation assets. Lars and Albert have been working closely together in developing the transition and strategy for the STEM technology team. Eight years ago, Lars joined STEM to lead the company's hardware and software engineering teams driving the evolution of our Athena platform. Lars has helped to scale our global technology team and has extensive industry knowledge and customer engagement has been instrumental to STEM's growth and recognition. Lars will continue to consult for the company supporting key product initiatives. We wish Lars and his family all the best in the next chapter, and he will always be part of the STEM family. During our last earnings call, I also mentioned that we were initiating a search for a board member with software expertise. I'm thrilled to announce that Gerard Cunningham has joined the STEM board effective April 19th. Gerard brings extensive experience in the technology, software services, and most importantly, the AI sector. He founded several companies in the data science space and most recently was a partner at McKinsey where he co-founded and led the global clean technology practice in addition to launching the AI for sustainability initiative. Gerard was also a leader of the McKinsey's digital business building practice. With that, I want to thank shareholders, employees, customers, channel partners, and suppliers. And now, operator, let's open the line for questions, please.
spk05: A question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your questions from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. The first question comes from the line of James West with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.
spk00: Hey, good afternoon, guys. Afternoon, James. So, understanding that you kept your revenue guidance and most of your guidance generally the same, ex the non-cash charge, A lot of it is back in loaded here. I'm curious about the confidence that you have in hitting those revenue targets that you've outlined. Given interconnection delays and hookup delays and things like that, are these projects that you have line of sight on or are these projects where they could slip?
spk15: Hey, James, thanks for the question. This is Bill Bush. So I think we're very confident in the revenue goals that we've laid out. And I think the reason for that confidence is based in the projects themselves. And so while I would agree it is possible that we could have some shifting, there's also other projects which we could move in. So I think we've got the ability to, I wouldn't say mix and match, but we certainly have the ability to hit the goals with the pipeline that we have. So we're quite confident in where we are. I mean, I think the first quarter is always a tough quarter because you have, you know, like we guided to the 8% revenue number. Net of the adjustment, we basically did a little bit better than that. But I mean, it's a small number. And that's been true for a long time. You know, this business has always been pretty cyclical and it hasn't really changed. And so I think the only thing that has changed is the size of the projects which we're working on, which we've talked about at length in other calls. So I think what you're seeing is a bit more variation. We certainly saw that in terms of bookings this quarter. But ultimately, what we're trying to make sure that we're focused on is positive EBITDA and generation of cash flow. So I think those are goals that we did reasonably well with this quarter. $600,000 negative operating cash in the quarter, I think, was really an accomplishment for us. And certainly where we are from an EBITDA standpoint is actually ahead of where we are. I think when we think about it every day, it's cash flow generation, gross margins. This quarter, of course, we had record non-GAAP gross margins, which I think is super important for us in terms of meeting those cash and income goals or really EBITDA goals. And so I think all things being equal, I think the business is on track to be able to achieve the goals that we laid out.
spk00: Okay, that's very helpful, Bill. Thanks for that. And then maybe just to follow up here, are you starting to see, as I know everybody's been talking about permitting challenges and interconnection challenges, are you seeing those lengthen further? Are they stabilizing? Are they possibly getting better? How do you guys feel about those issues?
spk15: You know, I think that interconnection and permitting have always been a problem. And I think this year in particular, I think we've seen some additional slowdowns to what we've seen in prior periods. But I think on the other side of that, I would say, you know, other things can happen as well. I mean, the United Project, which we've talked about at length, was actually some of the first, there's four total sites there on that project, 313 megawatt hours in total. And those sites have started to turn on here just within the last few days. And so from that standpoint, that system became a booking, a revenue event, and now a software event in a year. So I would say one of the things that we've talked about as well in the past is really shifting the business away from projects where the, you know, say the customer has less control over what's going on from a near connection standpoint. So really we've moved much more into the municipal power and public power markets. which have different interconnection schemes than maybe what some of the classic CNI projects have. And so for sure, I think the news is generally not great for CNI projects in terms of interconnection. I think we are seeing slowdowns there, but that's becoming a smaller part of the overall business of the company. And so that's how we're combating that negative headwind is by moving away from projects which are particularly susceptible to those sorts of delays. Okay, got it. Thanks, Bill.
spk05: Thank you. Next question comes from the line of John Windham with UBS. Please go ahead.
spk10: Hey, great. Thanks. I was wondering if you just sort of helped talk through your sales strategy points of differentiation going into the utility scale market a bit more, um, on, on the storage side and just, um, how you line up with competitors. Thanks.
spk02: Hey John, this is Prakash Patel. Uh, I think, uh, you know, the way we really differentiate ourselves in the market is through the project economics that we deliver for customers using our software. Uh, you know, we consistently talk about in prior quarters and, um, provide examples of how our software delivers much better project returns than competitive solutions. And so there's a multi-pronged approach to driving that uptake either by engaging with asset owners and having them specify or push down to project. You must use STEM software in projects that will finance or directly engaging with these project developers and engineering procurement firms and helping them through the bankability as well as advancing their projects. One of the things we talked about this quarter is the fact that we dramatically accelerated the activation of our storage projects. You know, if you look at for the balance of 2024, that's about a 42% uplift from what we thought would happen at the beginning of this year in January. A lot of that is blocking and tackling and helping those customers move through and advance their interconnection timelines and the like. So that subject matter expertise, the differentiated software economics is really what drives our competitive advantage on the storage side.
spk10: Got it. Thanks. And if you would allow me, I'd have one just sort of accounting question. The $33 million non-cash charge, I know we went through this in the third quarter as well. What's the mechanics of that? Is it like a reduction in accounts receivable?
spk15: That's right. Exactly. It's a reduction in accounts receivable, reduction in revenue. Got it. Perfect. Thank you so much.
spk08: Let me just add on to that to give everybody, this is John Carrington, give a quick explanation of the revenue adjustment to kind of level set everyone. We've been focused on warranty contracts from accounts receivable to cash. And there was a significant reduction in project values as a result of deteriorating market conditions. But we did transact with our customers to resolve about 50% of the hardware subject to these guarantees. And we expect to close those in the second and third quarter of this year and have updated the value of the remaining hardware. So I would also add, I think this is an important component of this, that this legacy guarantee structure enabled our rapid growth into the utility scale market And it resulted in over a billion dollars of executed customer contracts. And those contracts will drive significant recurring software revenue. So I just want to add that point if I could, please.
spk07: So let's go to the next question.
spk05: Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Andrew Pococo with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Great.
spk03: Thanks so much for taking the question. I guess I just wanted to start with this few questions on this backlog cleansing effort that you guys are doing. I guess, you know, first, you know, when were these projects booked? And I guess what's changed? Were there changes to the customer, maybe credit quality or credit worthiness? Or was it just more underlying underwriting related to the margin profile? And then I guess a second follow up to that would be, Are you done with that effort or are you still kind of evaluating the backlog and could there be additional attrition from here?
spk15: So I think, let me start with the last question first. Thanks for that question, Andrew. So this is Bill Bush on the line. We are done, but I would also say that we're constantly reviewing the components of the deal. I mean, I think we've done a lot of things in the last year, year and a half that have driven us towards a positive EBITDA outcome. And this is just one of those efforts. I mean, we cleansed the AUM, you know, on the solar side. Now, just about a year ago, we've done a number of things in terms of projects. And so we're always trying to make sure that we've got maximum leverage in the backlog. And these projects were really for a combination of reasons. We determined that they just weren't projects that the company should be working on. that they either had low margin profiles, were in territories where we didn't have enough leverage or concentration, were customers that we believed to be non-core to the total business. And so there's a lot of different reasons. And it was a pretty big effort across the team. But we're trying to make sure that we have maximum leverage across our employee base to work on projects which generate cash for the business. And so that's really the result of all that work.
spk08: I'd add, Andrew, that I think a lot of these were areas that maybe we didn't see as prospective markets that we could scale in as well. So getting rid of those one-offs, very high cost to serve, and very much around a focus, as Bill mentioned, on contribution margin. So it was the right thing to do for the business. And as Bill said, that project's complete.
spk03: Got it. Totally makes sense then. Okay. And then my second question would just be on margins adjusted margins were pretty strong in the quarter and i guess i would typically think of the first quarter as as the low point just given your seasonality on volumes but um gross margins on an adjusted basis were well above your your guided range for the whole year so can you just help us think about the cadence for the remainder of the year on margins and cash flow as well thank you yeah so andrew thanks for the that question so i think um
spk15: As it has been true for a while, the first quarter gross margin is typically the strongest. So you'll recall, you know, last year we were at 19%, we ended the year at a total of 15. So we kind of feel like we're, you know, obviously, again, this is a relatively small part of the total year, but we're, you know, we're trending in the right direction from the standpoint of margins, you know, so we're, you know, four or five points higher than we were last year. And so, you know, that, you know, when folks say, hey, do you have confidence in the guide? You know, doing things like that gives you the ability to have confidence in that guide, that you started five points higher on a comparative basis. Last year, we were at 19%, went to 15 for the full year. And this year, we're starting at 24. So we kind of feel like the midpoint of that guide is defensible. So we're feeling pretty good about where we are. Obviously, as we ship more hardware, the margin is going to decline. I mean, there's no doubt about that. The sale of hardware is a lower margin product than software, but software as a total part of the business is increasing. One of the things that John talked about in his prepared remarks was the car to ARR cycling, and we expect to see a lot more of that in the rest of the year. So all of those things, though, end up in a positive cash flow profile. And that's really where, yeah, I think when you think about margins, think about cost controls, all of that stuff, you think about like, what are the projects that you're working on? You know, are those, you know, positive in terms of the total guide for the business? And so we feel like, you know, the EBITDA number that we've given, you know, is definitely defensible and as is the cash flow number. I mean, we had a pretty, you know, we had flat cash on a sequential basis, which is fairly unusual for us. I mean, in that, you know, typically as you're coming out of the fourth quarter, you're starting to really pay down accounts payable as you, you know, hardware, you know, you know, understand your terms and we were able to maintain our cash position. And we feel like there's a lot of receivables out there that we can collect and build that $50 million number that we've talked about a bunch. So, so, you know, it's, it's always hard in the first quarter because it is a small part of the total year. But I would say, you know, when we look at where we are and what we have in front of us, you know, the goals that we've laid out are achievable.
spk07: Great. Thank you. I'll take the rest offline. Thank you.
spk05: Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Thomas Boyce with TD Cohen. Please go ahead.
spk11: Thanks for taking my questions. The first one, you know, great to see kind of power track announcement. I just wanted to get more insight maybe into the go-to-market strategy for the solution as it's deployed to customers exiting the year. You know, is kind of the goal to leverage it primarily first with hybrid deployments, or is kind of the key the flexibility to address both solar and storage and take advantage of some brownfield opportunities? The reason that I ask is, you know, just looking at the interconnection queue, exiting 2023, you know, around I think 80 percent of all of the new capacity requests were for solar for storage. I was just wondering how you were thinking about that.
spk08: Thomas John here. Yeah, I'd say the Powertrack APM suite in general is, you know, really a software-only solution that we are targeting to help the management of really storage solar and hybrid energy asset portfolios. So it's really across the board. You know, it's interesting. It's another one of these projects whereby our customers have asked us to build a platform that is not available in the market today. And we have a core team specifically focused around software only that is out talking to a variety of different types of customers, bringing that back to our developers. And that global development team is doing a tremendous job, particularly as you think about our India Center of Excellence, pulling all of that global network available that we have to develop these products. We're doing it much quicker and much more aligned to what our voice of customer that we're getting as far as what is missing in the market and STEM's filling that void and really excited about the Powertrack APM uptick and the interest by customers. And again, as we said, that's something that we'll have available at a demo this summer. Interestingly enough, we've got multiple customers interested in doing the demo and then more broadly at the end of the year. Prakash, you had something to add?
spk02: Yeah. Hey, Thomas. This is Prakash. As far as the market, definitely this is another example of a solution that can work in existing operating storage assets. So it's applicable for brownfield as well as new build. So it's another way for us to access software services growth without waiting for interconnection approval.
spk11: Great. And I appreciate the color there. I just wanted to dig in a bit on the solar AUM decline. Was this really for those legacy contracts that ended up not making the transition from the initial pruning efforts that you had kind of around the analyst day? Or is this exiting business with new customers that are just not hitting an even higher profitability threshold that you've kind of used?
spk02: That's really what, this is for Keshe again, it's really what Bill laid out earlier. We took a screen of, are there subscale customers that are difficult to serve? Is it a lower margin contract? And one other thing I would hit on is, and this was especially true on the storage side, will it tie up additional working capital? If any of those hit, then we would flag that and it was reviewed. And then unless it's a very strategic customer, we opted to cancel that agreement. So that's really what drove all this activity.
spk11: Got it. Understood.
spk06: I appreciate it. I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks. Thank you, Thomas. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Justin Blair with Roth NKM. Please go ahead. Mr. Clare, please go ahead with your question.
spk16: Yep, can you hear me? Now we can. Okay, great. Sorry about that. Yeah, so first wanted to just ask about the impact on ARR. So it would seem if you took the write-down, I guess, and lowered the value of ARR, it would have an impact on the cash flows that you would anticipate collecting this year if you had been anticipating essentially selling that legacy hardware within the year. So the question is, you know, does this have an impact on the cash flow for the year and an impact on your guide, and are there offsetting factors that, you know, would essentially offset this?
spk15: So I think when I think about the backlog generally, I mean, we're always taking a look at, you know, how durable that backlog is and really what I mean by that is saying from a margin standpoint. So I think that when the evaluation that we did was really targeted to that, like as we're looking at projects, you know, which are cancelable prior to a PO being placed, you know, are we able you know, particularly in this market for hardware, are we able to create a situation with a customer where we have a positive cash flow environment? And so that's really the gist of everything. And I think, you know, can we, you know, so if the question is, then can we refresh that backlog with better projects? I think the answer is yes. And, you know, when, you know, we've reaffirmed the guide of $1.5 to $2 billion in total bookings. And I think I think from that standpoint, I think we're in a good position. Ultimately, the question is going to be, you know, how quickly can you collect on that accounts receivable? And I think these are deals that, you know, we've really restructured such that the velocity of the cash flow is higher. So I think those, you know, it starts at looking at the first piece, which is what's the margin profile of the project? What's the timeline associated with the project? And then what's the cash flow velocity associated with it? And so we think that we're going to replace the backlog with projects which are more favorable for the business than those that went away.
spk16: Okay, got it. And then maybe just one more. Curious on, so it sounds like with the legacy hardware, some of it is being incorporated into development projects. And so wondering what stage are those projects in? Have you signed effectively PPAs for those projects? And then are those planned for sale in 2024? And is that a part of your cash flow expectations?
spk15: So, the projects are in development. They are expected to be sold this year. In some cases, those projects will, you know, they'll COD this year, but most will probably COD next year in 2025. you know, when we think about the cash flow profiles of those, they're definitely going to contribute to cash this year.
spk05: Okay. I appreciate it.
spk06: Thank you.
spk04: Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
spk09: Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. I had to hop around on a couple calls this afternoon, so I might have missed a couple things you said at the beginning. So apologies in advance if these are redundant. On the contracts you canceled, did you specify kind of the range of, you know, you called them low margin contracts? contracts? What's sort of the delta between what you canceled and what you are keeping in the backlog? Just trying to get a sense of what that kind of threshold is for, you know, not hitting your target, you know, target profit levels.
spk07: Yeah, Brian, this is John. Thanks.
spk08: Good to hear from you. I think, you know, the ones that we consider to be out of scope would be below the and a gross margin targets that we set for the business. And that was one of the thresholds. As I mentioned, I think the other important component is we've really looked at what kind of installations or total megawatt hours or what other metric you may have that would actually be enough to spread those costs out to make it compelling. To do 15 sites in Des Moines, Iowa is not a great outcome for the company. So that was another lens we looked at, but certainly the contribution margin to align with guidance and then obviously looking at markets where we had critical mass of systems. And by the way, that could change. I mean, if local legislation, state legislation changes, we could go back into that market. I mean, the nice thing about our model is there is a certain flexibility that we have if things change to move very quickly because A lot of these customers have multi-sites in a variety of states, and we're their preferred supplier, so we can go where they need to go wherever the market dynamics change in favor of that contribution margin equation that we mentioned earlier.
spk09: Okay, understood. That's helpful. And then on these hardware... revaluations. I think it might be maybe the second time you've seen some of this. And then you also cited there's another $50 million of contracts that could potentially need to be revalued. I mean, non-cash consideration, obviously, but still it is impacting kind of the outlook in terms of some of your KPIs that the market and investors follow. So can you... Just the thought process around identifying potentially $50 million still left through the balance of this year or early next year. Do you have a high confidence level of being able to remarket those? Is this more of an auditor decision, whether you get to actually pull the trigger on taking that out of the numbers or not? What's the thought process? Because it feels like you're still subject to another headline decision. risk on this number if it does, you know, get to a point later this year where you decide you have to, you know, take it out of the revenue outlook again.
spk15: So, thanks, Brian, for the question. This is Bill. When we looked at the variable consideration, you know, we're constantly and on a quarterly basis taking a look at all of the potential variable consideration components. So I would say it's not really an auditor decision, this is a management decision. We just looked at what we saw as the implied value of the underlying projects and how the equipment that we own interplays into that. And did that math, we determined that, you know, we were going to need to make an adjustment to that variable consideration. I mean, that analysis will continue. I mean, the good news is we do have a robust portfolio of projects because ultimately the equipment, while, you know, an integral part of any storage project, is not the only way you think about it. I mean, the other question, of course, is like what's going on in the revenue side of the project and other factors. So, I think the market for the equipment, you know, or say the valuation of the equipment reflects the current market conditions. I mean that, you know, and so that's how we did the analysis. And certainly I wouldn't disagree with you that there is more risk in that $50 million of remaining equipment. But I think we've got a portfolio of projects which we can place it into. And so we're confident that we can do that.
spk09: Okay, that's helpful. And then just last one for me. So it is a legacy issue. So we shouldn't, you know, it's nice to have it out there that, you know, you're kind of capping it at $50 million if it does come to fruition. Could you remind us, you know, some of your peers with, you know, lithium and battery prices continuing to remain volatile, you know, they've implemented like RMI index-based pricing and other strategies. How are you going to market with the pricing and cost management on the hardware side because you're not doing these legacy guarantees anymore? Could you remind us what the strategy is for the larger scale projects you're going after now?
spk15: Yeah, so you're absolutely correct.
spk14: First, we are not issuing guarantees like that anymore. So it's been a little while since we did them.
spk15: Since then, we've really gotten super short on contracts because I think one of the things that we've seen in, say, the lithium market is that there's been a lot of supply that's come into the market here in the last maybe six months and really starting to see the impact of that in the last couple of months. And so battery prices have, even though, I mean, it's almost become distanced from the lithium index. I mean, if you, I don't know how closely you follow it, but like the index has actually increased since March, almost 15%. Um, however, battery prices have declined pretty dramatically across all the major manufacturers during that same time period. So, and, and I would say, um, delivery timeframes have gotten probably more aggressive than they have been in the past. So this really, you know, which kind of went into the valuation of the variable consideration, you know, conversation that we're having before. So I think one of the things that we've done is we've gotten really close with our customers and said, like, when do you really need the equipment? Let's, you know, which is a difference from, you know, maybe a year or two ago when folks were more than willing just to buy things just to make sure that they had them for when the projects were ready. Now people are kind of holding off. and buying when they actually need the equipment. So the good news, I think, for us is that two things are going to happen. One, the battery delivery is going to be more reflective of the current market conditions. And because the batteries are purchased closer to their installation dates, you should see a speeding up of car to ARR, which is exactly what happened in the first quarter here. So I think one of the things that we're trying to do is really kind of shift the business From where we were, I mean, you know, depending on how long folks have been following the company used to be really a straight BTM company. And now we're really, we've changed both the model of moving to FTM, but also the type of FTM that we, that we pursue. And so I think one of the things that we're, you're going to be seeing from us is quicker conversions. From bookings to hardware revenue events and quicker, um, from car, you know, when, you know, basically when that, that hardware is delivered. to when the actual software starts working. And so I think for us, that's really our strategy is shortening those timeframes such that there's quicker conversion from a booking to revenue, and particularly on the software side.
spk08: And I think from a contract level, we're about 40% for 2024. Is that about right, Bill? Sorry, Brian, go ahead.
spk09: No, I was going to say I appreciate all that, Colin, and the additional percentages are helpful, too. Thank you, John.
spk05: Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Joe Osher with Hugenheim Partners. Please go ahead.
spk01: Hi there. Thanks for fitting me in. We've kind of talked a lot of numbers around, but I wanted to see if I could just make sure I understand it. You're talking about exiting the year at a CAR of 115 to 130. We've talked a lot about CAR to ARR conversion. So what should that 115... to 130 reflect in terms of an ARR annualized run rate at the end of the year, you think?
spk15: I don't think we've given that specific guidance, Joe. So, I think I'm going to stay away from that answer. And so, I'll apologize and go to your next question. Okay.
spk01: All right. Can we assume that the rate of conversion is going to improve? I mean, I know there's been lots of All right. Can you give us the signposts at least, right? Because I think one of the challenges here is that, you know, we do see the CAR metric moving, but the ARR is not. And you've chosen to talk a lot about on this call about how the conversion is improving. So, what kind of signposts can you give us to at least try and make a guess at that on our own?
spk15: Well, I think we had, you know, so in the fourth quarter presentation, we had a slide around CAR and ARR. where um you know we kind of laid out you know kind of didn't give specific numbers but certainly graphically you know showed kind of where things were and so i think one of the things that we have seen generally is you know around when we had you know the 91 million dollars which was of course the car number as of the end of 2023 about half of that was irr or so and so i think one of the things that we're trying to do is get that number higher as a percentage And, you know, so the numbers that John gave you or gave the call a few moments ago give, you know, give credence to the fact that there is an increasing rate of CAR to ARR conversion.
spk01: Okay, thanks. Second question, and, you know, you showed a, you know, quite a nice improvement in terms of the amount of working capital tied up in receivables, sequentially it's down to like 240. Just kind of wondering, given, you know, how everything you've talked about in terms of, you know, trying to improve the velocity cash and so forth, could we see the number trend back to, like, where it was in 22, where it was, like, 95 million and 144? Are we going to free up a significant amount of additional cash here, or should I still think about this receivables number bouncing along in the kind of low to mid 200s? How should I think about that going forward?
spk15: Yeah, I think we've been pretty transparent about that receivables number. I mean, last quarter, it was just over a little bit over 300 million. And I think we talked, you know, in the call, like we expected to be able to reduce that number by around $100 million and, you know, return that cash to the balance sheet. So that's really, that's the target for us. I mean, I think, you know, depending on what time of the year you're talking about, I think probably a number between, you know, kind of $175 and $225 million in receivables is probably the right number for us, depending on what period of time you're talking about. I mean, that's an important distinction. But, I mean, for sure, we got a little heavy on the receivable side. And, you know, our goal is to reduce that. One of the, you know, so one of the questions that we get a lot is like, hey, do you have to raise cash? And I would, I mean, I consistently answer that by saying we've got to collect our receivables. And that will be the way that we raise cash. So, yeah, I think we saw the first spots of that this quarter. Net of the adjustment that we've been talking about, receivables did decline by around $30 million. AP came down as well. And so, you know, I think we're going the right direction from a cash generation standpoint. And, you know, we feel really confident that we can make that $50 million number that we laid out for the year.
spk01: Yeah, and I wasn't casting aspersions. I was just trying to understand. None were taken. That's helpful. So 175 to 225, that's kind of helpful. Thank you. Yeah, and then my last question is, you know, we hear a lot, and I think we've, you know, some questions in this call alluded to it. We're hearing a lot about SunGrow, Canadian, some of these guys showing up with combination BESS, you know, inverter solutions and customers self-integrating, you know, CATL as well. Are you all seeing that? And I'm curious, does that potentially represent, you know, an opportunity for you guys as you think about the software-only part of your business as, you know, more of these Chinese guys show up and sell directly?
spk08: Yeah, Joe, John here. I think it is an opportunity for us. Some of the names that you've mentioned, certainly we've, they're either existing suppliers to us or ones that would have a need for the STEM system. Modular ESS is a good example that could integrate into their offering. So I think you're on the right track. And I think the breadth of the Athena platform is being recognized by these OEMs. And so we're excited about that opportunity.
spk02: So this is Prakash. One of the other things, and you highlighted this with the Chinese OEMs, is there's increasing cybersecurity and national security concerns by a lot of grid operators. And it presents a good opportunity for us to partner with these OEMs to use our software where a U.S.-based company can guarantee NERC, SIP, other compliance standards and have no, you know, we've worked with utilities. Actually, the first largest utility contract of any storage provider was STEM. So we have a lot of credibility there. opportunities for us as a result.
spk07: Okay, thank you very much. Thanks, Joe.
spk05: Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Kashi Hansen with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.
spk12: Good evening, Nando. Thanks for taking my questions. Just two for me. First one is on the gap gross margins for software and services. It looks like it got quite a bit better year over year, and I think quarter over quarter as well. Can you speak to what the driver was of that improvement and how sustainable the current software gross margins are?
spk15: We think that it is sustainable first. And I think the reason for that growth is a combination of effects, but principally it's you know, the newer, i.e., within the last couple of years, software contracts coming online and being fully effective, while the older, what we call the host customer systems, falling off. And so that mix is continuing. And I think the other part of it, of course, is the continued impact of the growth in the solar part of the business on the services.
spk12: Okay. Yeah, that's helpful. Thanks. And then my next question is on the booking side, specifically 23.8 mil. I get that it's lumpy, it's FTM, but that's still a pretty big drop from the 364 last year. And so I was just wondering if you could share some context on what happened with bookings this quarter. Are you seeing anything change in the market? Or was this about in line with what you expected? I know you shifted away from quarterly bookings. Just any sort of call on the market would be great.
spk08: Yeah, Hashie. John Carrington here. Look, I'd say a couple things. You know, it is lumpier for sure. As we have expanded into the larger scale front of the meter storage projects, the timing of these bookings has certainly moved around. It's exactly what I saw when I was at First Solar, incidentally. And so I've seen this playbook before. I would also add that our project size has tripled over the past two years. And we have a substantial number of projects that are advanced stages of negotiations that Bill mentioned earlier or expected to close in the near term. So I think we feel good about the total year, as we mentioned, the commercial momentum, and we remain confident in achieving our $1.5 to $2 billion bookings target for the full year. But yeah, it's It's just landing the plane every quarter on a bookings metric is tough as you get bigger and bigger projects.
spk06: Got it. Thank you.
spk05: Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor over to John Carrington for closing comments.
spk08: Thank you, Renju, and I want to thank everyone for joining our first quarter earnings call, and we look forward to speaking with you during our second quarter earnings call, which will take place in August.
spk05: Thank you. This concludes today's study conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Disclaimer