SunCoke Energy, Inc.

Good day and welcome to the Suncoke Energy Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. To answer your question, please press star then two. Please note today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Shantanu Nagarwal, Vice President, Finance, and Treasurer. Please go ahead.

Thanks, Roko. Good morning, and thank you for joining us this morning to discuss Suncoke Energy's fourth quarter and full year 2024 results, as well as 2025 guidance. With me today are Catherine Gates, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Marinko, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Following management's prepared remarks, we'll open the call for Q&A. This conference call is being webcast live on the investor relations section of our website, and a replay will be available later today. If we don't get to your questions on the call today, please feel free to reach out to our investor relations team. Before I turn things over to Catherine, let me remind you that the various remarks we make on today's call regarding future expectations constitute forward-looking statements. The cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements in our SEC filings apply to the remarks we make today. These documents are available on our website as are reconciliations to non-GAAP financial measures discussed on today's call. With that, I'll now turn things over to Catherine.

Thanks, Shantanu. Good morning. Thank you for joining us today. Earlier today, we announced Suncoke Energy's fourth quarter results. Before I turn it over to Mark to review the results in detail, I want to share a few highlights from 2024. First, I want to recognize our remarkable achievement in safety performance. Suncoke ended the year with a record-setting total recordable incident rate of .5. Safety is our first priority, and I'd like to thank all of our employees for their continued commitment to exceptional safety performance. Turning to our financial achievements, we delivered consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $272.8 million, exceeding the high end of our increased guidance range of $270 million. Excellent performance from our logistics segment and the one-time gain from the Department of Labor agreement drove our results. We generated $96 million of free cash flow, exceeding the high end of our guidance range of $90 million. Our Coke plants ran full in 2024, and we successfully sold all non-contracted tons into the foundry and spot blast Coke markets, delivering adjusted EBITDA within our revised guidance range despite lower coal to coke yields. In addition, we extended our Granite City coke making contract through June 2025 with the option for the customer to extend through year end. In the logistics segment, we grew our barge business at our Kanawha River Terminal and benefited from the API 2 price adjustment at Convent Marine Terminal. We also signed a new three-year take or pay coal handling agreement at KRT and expect to see the benefit of that beginning in Q3 when the capital project is complete. We made great progress on our capital allocation priorities in 2024, returning approximately $38 million to our shareholders via our quarterly dividend, which was increased from 10 cents per share to 12 cents per share. We expect to continue our quarterly dividend throughout 2025. We ended the year with a gross leverage ratio of 1.83 times on a last 12 months adjusted EBITDA basis. Finally, the additional delays of the U.S. Steel Nippon transaction have unfortunately resulted in ongoing delays for an agreement on the GPI project. Despite this, we recognize the significant merits of the project and remain focused on its development. With that, I'll turn it over to Mark to review our fourth quarter and full year earnings in detail. Mark?

Thanks, Catherine. Turning to slide four, the fourth quarter net income attributable to Suncoke was $0.28 per share, up $0.12 versus the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily driven by lower depreciation expense. Our full year 2024 net income attributable to Suncoke was $1.12 per share, up 44 cents versus the full year 2023. The increase was primarily driven by lower depreciation expense, the one-time gain from the agreement with the DOL, and lower income tax expense. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter 2024 was $66.1 million, up $3.8 million versus the fourth quarter of 2023. The increase was mainly driven by lower planned outage-related costs in the domestic Coke segment and higher transloading volumes in the logistics segment. On a full year basis, we delivered adjusted EBITDA of $272.8 million, up $4 million versus $268.8 million in 2023. The year-over-year increase was mainly driven by the one-time gain from the DOL agreement, higher transloading volumes at domestic logistics terminals, and higher API2 price adjustment benefit at CMT, partially offset by lower coal-to-coke yields on our long-term take-or-pay contracts in the domestic coke segment. Turning to slide five to discuss the year-over-year adjusted EBITDA variance in detail. Our domestic coke business operated at full capacity, but was impacted by lower coal-to-coke yields on our long-term take-or-pay contracts. the domestic coke segment delivered full year adjusted EBITDA of $234.7 million within our full year revised domestic coke guidance range. Including Brazil, our coke operations delivered adjusted EBITDA of $244.6 million. Logistics segment adjusted EBITDA increased by $6.1 million year over year, driven by higher volumes at domestic logistics terminals from new spot barge business, and higher API 2 price adjustment benefit at CMT. The logistics segment delivered full year adjusted EBITDA of $50.4 million. Finally, our corporate and other expenses, which include results from our legacy coal mining business, were lower by $10.2 million year over year, mainly due to the one-time gain on the elimination of the majority of our legacy black long liabilities. Turning to slide six to discuss capital deployment in 2024. We generated operating cash flow of $168.8 million in 2024, including the impact of the $36 million payment to the DOL. Capital expenditures came in at $72.9 million, which was slightly below our guidance range of $75 to $80 million. We also returned capital to our shareholders in the form of a 44 cents per share annual dividend, which was a use of approximately 38 million of cash. In July, we increased our dividend by 20% from 10 cents to 12 cents per share. We ended 2024 with a cash balance of $189.6 million and full availability of our $350 million revolver, resulting in strong liquidity of approximately 540 million. Now I'd like to turn to our guidance expectations for 2025. We expect consolidated adjusted EBITDA to be between 210 and 225 million in 2025. Domestic coke adjusted EBITDA is expected to be lower by 43 to $50 million, primarily driven by lower margins at both Granite City and Haber Hill. Our guidance contemplates the lower economics from the contract extension at Granite City and assumes that the customer will execute the additional six month option to extend the contract through the end of the year. Currently, we have not reached an agreement on the expiring contract at Haberhill and have assumed that those tons will be sold in the spot market at lower margins. We are essentially sold out for all of our Coke products for the full year, but have reflected the margin compression driven by soft spot Coke market conditions in our guidance. Brazil Coke adjusted EBITDA is expected to be essentially flat year over year. As a reminder, the Brazil Coke facility is owned by ArcelorMittal Brazil, and Sun Coke provides the operating and technological services pursuant to an operating agreement. Logistics adjusted EBITDA is expected to be flat to lower by $5 million in 2025. The absence of the one-time gain on the elimination of the majority of our black lung liabilities will result in a year-over-year decrease in adjusted EBITDA of $9.5 million. Lastly, we expect our corporate and other expenses to be lowered by $3 million to $5 million. Moving on to slide nine to discuss the domestic coax segment in detail. In 2025, we expect our domestic coke adjusted EBITDA to be between $185 and $192 million, with sales of approximately 4 million tons, which includes contract, foundry, and spot blast coke. We have approximately 3.3 million tons contracted under long-term take-or-pay agreements in 2025. We expect to sell the approximately 875,000 remaining furnace-equivalent tons in the foundry and spot coke markets. Our outlook is impacted by the lower economics from the Granite City contract extension and lower margins on higher spot sales. Our guidance currently contemplates that the non-contracted tons from Haverhill will be sold on a spot market as we do not yet have an agreement in place to renew the expiring contract. While the current pricing environment for SpotCook is challenging, there is still demand for our products and we are essentially sold out for the year. Our guidance also includes the assumption that the Granite City Coke making agreement will be extended for an additional six months through the end of 2025. Moving to slide 10 to discuss logistics in more detail. 2025 logistics adjusted EBITDA is estimated to be between 45 and $50 million. Our outlook for 2025 is similar to our 2024 operating performance. We are pleased to announce that we recently extended the take or pay coal handling agreement at CMT. The contract is for 4 million tons in 2025 and 2.5 million tons in 2026. And the API 2 index based price adjustment has been replaced by an FOB New Orleans index based price adjustment. We expect approximately 4 million tons of coal to be exported through CMT and approximately 4.1 million tons of non-coal throughput such as iron ore, pet coke, and other products. We have not included any index-based price adjustment benefit from our coal handling agreement at CMT in our 2025 guidance. We expect our domestic logistics terminals to handle approximately 14.8 million tons with the year-over-year volume increase being driven by the new take or pay coal handling agreement at KRT. Moving to slide 11. This slide lays out Suncoke's historical adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow generation, and annual dividends paid on a per share basis. As evident from this slide, Suncoke has a strong tech record of generating steady free cash flow. We developed Foundry Coke as a commercially viable product and entered the spot blast Coke market while navigating through the challenges of COVID in 2020. This resulted in 2021 and 2022 being the two best years in Suncoaks history with solid free cashflow conversion. We continue to expand our foundry market presence and participate in a spot blast Coke market during 23 and 2024 while logistics expanded both their customer base and services. We also refinance our debt and prioritize deleveraging during this period which allowed us to significantly lower our interest expense while resulting in higher free cash flow conversion. With our leverage target in sight, we prioritize return of capital to shareholders by establishing a quarterly dividend and increasing that dividend each year for three years in a row. As laid out in our previous slides, we expect a drop in our adjusted EBITDA for 2025 due to market conditions, but expect to have solid free cash flow generation in the range of $100 to $115 million. We expect to have lower capex spend of around $65 million compared to our normal run rate of $75 to $80 million. Our deliberate and careful capital allocation decisions over the last several years have strengthened our balance sheet and financial position while continuing to reward our long-term shareholders with our dividend. Moving to the 2025 guidance summary on slide 11. Once again, we expect consolidated adjusted EBITDA to be between $210 and $225 million. Our domestic Coke business is expected to deliver adjusted EBITDA between $185 and $192 million, while the logistics segment is expected to deliver between $45 and $50 million in adjusted EBITDA. As indicated earlier, we anticipate our CapEx requirements in 2025 to be approximately $65 million, which is lower than our normal annual run rate. We expect 2025 operating cash flow to be between $165 and $180 million, and our free cash flow is expected to be between $100 and $115 million. With that, I'll turn it back over to Catherine.

Thanks, Mark. Wrapping up on slide 13, we see 2025 reflecting the broader challenges the steel industry is facing with lower pricing and demand. At the same time, we continue to reliably produce high-quality coke and are essentially sold out for the full year. As always, safety is our first priority. We are coming off a year of record safety performance, and the team is energized and committed to maintaining strong safety and environmental performance in 2025. Robust safety and environmental standards set us apart and are central to our reliable delivery of high-quality Coke and logistics services. In 2025, our focus will be on maintaining the strength of our core businesses as we navigate challenging market conditions, as well as pursuing new opportunities across all areas of our business. We continue to see Suncoke being well-positioned for long-term success. Suncoke has the newest coke-making facilities in North America with the leading technology. We continue to invest in our assets to ensure that they are safe, efficient, reliable, and environmentally compliant, putting Suncoke in the best position to grow and diversify our customer and product base. As we've demonstrated in the past, we will pursue a balanced yet opportunistic approach to capital allocation. From a growth perspective, we continue to work on developing the Granite City GPI project. While we are frustrated by the additional delays outside of our control, we continue to believe in the value of the project. As always, we continuously evaluate the capital needs of the business, our capital structure, and the need to reward our shareholders, and we'll make capital allocation decisions accordingly. With that, let's go ahead and open up the call for Q&A.

Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If your question has already been addressed and you'd like to remove yourself from queue, please press stars and two. Today's first question comes from Nick Giles at B Reilly. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. Guys, my first question is on the, really the longer term outlook for your fleet and maybe more specifically in the event of a non-renewal at Haverhill, how should we think about utilization at that asset in the outer years and your willingness to be incrementally exposed to spot?

Thanks for the question. As we've said, currently we've not renewed our Haverhill contract, and as we've said previously, we're in constant dialogue with our customers. We recognize that we find ourselves in a challenging market at this particular time. With CLIS, the capacity utilization rate, as you know, for both EAFs and integrated producers is at about 74%. So at the same time, we don't believe that the market as it stands today is going to continue in the long term. You know, this is really a cyclical industry. And what we've seen is that we really have an ability to adapt to any sort of changing conditions. So if you think about our trajectory, and as Mark talked about, You know, we've moved forward in developing Foundry Coke as a product. We now sell that into the market. We've sold Spot Blast Coke very successfully into the market, including record years in 2021 and 2022. And we'll continue to adapt and sell, whether it be Foundry or Spot Blast Coke, into the North American or seaboard markets. as well as continuing to work with our long-term customers like Cliffs and continue to pursue our long-term contracts with Cliffs and, you know, with other suppliers.

Catherine, I really appreciate all those comments. Maybe my next question, you know, you're still anticipating strong free cash flow this year. CapEx is moving down. How should we think about potential orders of magnitude from a debt pay down perspective? And what could this mean further down the road for increased shareholder returns?

Nick, I can take the debt pay down question and then turn it over to Catherine for the second half. I mean, you know, where we sit from a debt perspective, we only have that you know, $500 million of senior bonds outstanding. So, and, you know, we refinanced that in 2021. It's sitting at an attractive rate. So right now, given, you know, what we see in the future, there's no plan of any debt buybacks or anything like that.

Yeah, and I would say when you think about capital allocation, as we've always said, you know, we look to reward our long-term shareholders. And, You know, one of the ways in which we focus on rewarding long-term shareholders is through pursuing profitable growth opportunities. So the GPI project is something that we continue to see the merits of, you know, as I mentioned earlier. I mean, if we think about that project, it's, you know, we have well-positioned low-cost iron ore. We have blast furnaces that are in place at Granite City Works. Our Coke plant is adjacent to those furnaces to provide the necessary fuel to make premium grade GPI for Big River. So that project is something that we continue to support. And as we said before, in looking at capital allocation, we take that into account as we focus on capital allocation today. We also continue to pursue other profitable growth opportunities outside of GPI. In doing that, we are extremely disciplined in our approach, and we also, as you know, look at dividends or buybacks, and we'll continue to make decisions that reward our long-term shareholders.

Sean Tanu, Catherine, thanks again. Maybe if I could just sneak one more in. Met coal prices have been under pressure for some time, and I was wondering if you could just remind us, When the bulk of your contracting occurs throughout a typical calendar year, do these prices impact the way that you approach procurement?

So, Nick, this is Shantanu. I'll take that. For our long-term take-or-pay contracts, those are all finalized. That happens around the September to November time period, right? the coal prices there really does not affect our profitability, right? Because those are like kind of pass through in our contract. And then, you know, when we are doing our foundry and spot coke sales, obviously, you know, we're looking at the market and take that into account while we are pricing our those coals. So essentially, you know, while we are buying those coals or finalizing the purchase of that, that's all factored in our kind of business plan or the projections here. Now, you know, as we announced today that we are essentially sold out for the full year, so more or less our coal buys are finalized. During the time period where there is some unsold, right, like say we don't have clarity in the second half of the year where our spot coke is going, then we'll have a little bit of open position, right? We try to tie our coal buys with our coke sales. So that's how it works. But specifically this year, there should be no major impact on the profitability from the coal purchases. And you're right that the prices, we are seeing downward pressure on that.

Shantanu, that's very clear. Guys, again, thanks for all the comments and continued best of luck. Thanks, Nick.

And our next question today comes from Nathan Martin with the Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. Congrats on the strong finish to the year. I wanted to look at the domestic Coke business specifically as we're looking at the initial 2025 guidance, calling for a considerable step down and adjusted EBITDA, which appears to be essentially entirely driven by lower expected EBITDA per ton. You guys called out the lower economics and margins at Granite City. That was known before. on that contract extension, as well as lower margins at Haverhill on those higher spot sales. But did you help us better understand kind of the bridge from $58 a ton in 2024 to $47 a ton, I think at the midpoint of 25 guidance? It would seem like margins, maybe the other operations would also need to be down a little bit. Is that the case? And any color would be helpful.

Sure, Nate. You know, I mean, it's mainly driven by those two factors, what we outlined, right? I mean, if you look at our sales projections from 24 to 25 and our operations, they are more or less, you know, kind of are going to be similar. Actually, you know, as we outlined for 2024, we had some cold to coke yields degradation. And that impacted our 24 results. We expect to somewhat improve in those things in 25. So operations is expected to actually improve in 25. But the impact of the two items, which you outlined and we outlined here, the Granite City contract economics, as well as the contract expiry at Haverhill, which is now at this point of time, we are expecting to you know, kind of going to the spot market, that is the driver of this big drop-off in EBITDA and domestic coke.

Any thoughts then maybe on kind of the cadence of EBITDA per ton for that business? Would you expect it to kind of weaken in the back half of the year given those items we just talked about?

Are you talking about like from a quarter-to-quarter perspective?

Exactly. Exactly.

yeah i mean you know we are like you know we the way we produce is 24 7 right so we have to manage our sales as we produce so we are you know we're trying to you know manage uh from quarter to quarter that that you know we are able to sell this product when we produce it because you cannot store it really well uh but to coming back to yes we expect a slight you know decline in the second half of the year versus the first half of the year given you know, that contract expires in the first half of the year.

Okay, that's fair. You know, maybe shifting gears over to the logistics side, I think, Mark, you mentioned API2 price adjustment has now been replaced by an FOB New Orleans price adjustment. I think that's what I heard over there at CMT. Can we get some additional thoughts there? Maybe what was the driver behind that change, and is there any way we can track that index?

Yep, so the API 2 price index, the reason for the customer made the request to change the index was that index wasn't really reflective of the markets they were playing in. So I really wanted to change it more to a market that they, you know, more relates to, you know, the market that they're, you know, sending their product to. So that's really the reason for that change.

And is there any way we can track that on our side?

I mean, yeah, the index is published, you know, by Platts on a daily basis, right? Like, so right now, what we can say is that, as we said, that there is no price benefit built into our guidance from that index. So you can assume that the index is not in the money right now, right? So and beyond that, it's hard for us to kind of, you know, disclose that. But if that index comes into the money, right, if it goes higher, then we'll have some benefit from that. I mean, it'll work very similar to the API 2 index, if you think about it like, you know, the way it has worked. Now, the points that we get into money versus out of money are slightly different, obviously, with being a different index.

Is it fair to assume that the economics, though, are fairly... fairly in line with the API2 adjustment you guys had previously from your standpoint?

Yes, I mean, you can see that from the guidance, right? Like kind of in 2024, we, you know, we had a significant benefit from the API2 index, right? And that was kind of, that drove part of the results of logistics. And in 25, what we're saying is we are seeing an increase in the domestic logistics volumes, but the offset is that we are not assuming any this price benefit, right? So yeah, the economics are very similar.

Okay, perfect. Appreciate that. And then maybe just kind of wrapping up on CapEx, your guidance, $65 million for the full year. You know, as you guys mentioned, that's below your normal level. Plus, I'm assuming that includes probably some remaining CapEx for the KRT upgrades. Is it possible to get a breakdown of that spend, maybe a little bit more color, why it's coming in below normal levels, and then How should we think about the timing? Should it be heavier maybe in the first half, just given the wrap-up of that spend at KRT?

Sure. So with respect to the overall amount coming down, we had had some very large projects that had been occurring in the prior years. We have now finished those projects. So those projects being complete is really the driver overall for the drop in our regular M&R CapEx. In terms of the breakdown in the 65, 5 million of that is growth CapEx for the remainder of the KRT project. And so as we sort of look going forward, We are really pretty steady for all four quarters, so you should see the CapEx spend really be steady for the full year.

Got it. Thank you, Catherine. And that 60 million maintenance, is that a good way to think about things going forward?

I would say that our run rate CapEx has been higher in the past, and we may have additional larger spend going forward. So I think you can still think of 70 to 80 as being our typical run rate CapEx.

Okay, yeah, and that was the genesis of my question. Like, really, why is it lower than that 70 to 80? Okay, I guess it's just some of those other projects wrapped. I mean, just maybe a final question. Coming back to the Granite City GPI project, clearly the acquisition of U.S. Steel by Nippon was blocked, although I think there might be a couple more months left on that agreement, so some turmoil possible with litigation, etc. How has that impacted your conversations with U.S. Steel? If the deal does end up not coming to fruition, could that speed up a decision on the GPI project and then At what point do you guys think you could give us any kind of ideas on CapEx? Would I have to wait until that thing moves forward or any additional thoughts? That would be great. Thank you.

Well, you used the word wait, and I think wait is sort of the word of the day. And we continue to wait with all the other parties as the lawsuit progresses. The deadline, as you mentioned, was extended to June. And frankly, we've been negatively impacted, many others have been negatively impacted by how long this has taken. With that said, the project is as strong today as it was when we announced it. So looking at U.S. Steel, we started the discussions with U.S. Steel prior to any sale process for U.S. Steel. Again, the basis for the project has always been the fact that the economic fundamentals are so strong between the low-cost iron ore, the blast furnaces, our adjacent coke plant, and the fact that we could be making this high premium GPI for Big River. You know, the benefits can be there for all the parties going forward, right, whether we're talking about the miners, the Granite City Works employees, our employees, and then the vendors and businesses that support our plant and U.S. Steel's plant. So, you know, there's no change in our hypothesis about this going forward. Obviously, if the project doesn't – excuse me, if the sale doesn't go forward – Again, the fundamentals of the project are there, and we've always said that we would look forward to working with NIPON or any other party, U.S. Steel or otherwise, on this project.

One thing I think, Nathan, you also mentioned, like I think you asked about CapEx, you know, when we announced this project two years back, you know, June 2022, again, there's two years dated. But what we did say was, you know, the CapEx on this project would be around two years of free cash flows plus some revolver borrowing, right? So we kind of gave some kind of guidelines around what the CapEx would be. So just wanted to highlight that, like we did say that at that point of time.

Yes, Shantanu, I appreciate that reminder. I recall that now. Catherine, thank you for your answer as well. And Mark, I'll leave it there. Best of luck in 25. Thank you.

Thank you.

And as a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star then 1. Our next question comes from Abe Landa with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Good morning. This is Abe Landa. Thank you for taking my question. And maybe moving on to kind of one of your – which is going through EBITDA reconciliation and under that transaction costs. But no, I saw that spend kind of increase from $1.8 million in the fourth quarter versus $0.2 million in the prior nine months. And you also added this language of potential mergers and acquisition, I guess – What is the M&A that's being considered? Are you being acquired? Are you looking to acquire something? And kind of what are these areas of growth?

Well, as I mentioned before, we are always looking at potential profitable growth opportunities. And so, you know, in doing that, and this is obviously in addition to the GPI project, So in doing that, we will spend money in order to look at and potentially move forward with opportunities. Obviously, what we look at and whatever potential growth opportunities are out there are not something that we can discuss unless something was to come to fruition.

Are these areas that you're currently operating in or different areas?

You know, in terms of pursuing profitable growth opportunities, as I've said before, we remain very disciplined. So we obviously focus when we look at growth on areas where we think that we can add value. And again, you know, it would have to be something where we knew that it could be profitable and reward our long-term shareholders.

Okay. And then maybe the next question is just on your revolver, which is due in 2026. I think it actually comes current in about five months. Are you having any early discussions with banks about potentially extending or anything along those lines with the revolver?

Yeah. Yes, definitely. Right. Like, I mean, it, it, it, comes current in June of 2025, right? So we have had some early discussions and we'll address it as it comes along. So no red flags and no issues as we see there.

Those are the only two questions that I have. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. And this concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Catherine Gates for any closing remarks.

I want to thank everyone for joining us today and, again, thank the Suncoke team for their hard work and record-setting safety performance in 2024. We are well-positioned to meet our financial targets and create value for shareholders. Let's continue to work safely today and every day.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.