Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.

Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Sixth Street Specialty Lending Inc. Q3 2025 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising that your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Cami Van Horn, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Before we begin today's call, I would like to remind our listeners that remarks made during the call may contain forward-looking statements. Statements other than statements of historical facts made during this call may constitute forward-looking statements and are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time to time in Sixth Street Specialty Lending Inc's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Yesterday, after the market closed, We issued our earnings press release for the third quarter ended September 30th, 2025, and posted a presentation to the investor resources section of our website, www.sixthstreetspecialtylending.com. The presentation should be reviewed in conjunction with our form 10Q filed yesterday with the SEC. Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.' 's earnings release is also available on our website under the investor resources section. Unless noted otherwise, all performance figures mentioned in today's prepared remarks are as of and for the third quarter ended September 30th, 2025. As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I will now turn the call over to Joshua Easterly, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I assume everybody has seen my most recent letter in the 8K posted last night with our earnings. I'm joined by our newly announced co-CEO, Bo Stanley, and our CFO, Ian Simmons. Before covering our Q3 2025 results, I wanted to discuss the leadership changes that were announced yesterday. We are excited to announce that Bo has been named co-CEO, effective immediately. Bo and I have been working together for the better part of the past 25 years. As an early member of the 6th Street team, Bo possesses an unparalleled understanding of our industry, is a tremendous leader and investor. As a key member of the management team, Bo has also been a driving force in preserving and strengthening the investor-first mentality that defines the Sixth Street culture. After 15 years of leading the business and what is now my 47th public earnings call, I'll be stepping down from the CEO seat at the end of the year. This decision is made with considerable optimism for the future of the company. Bo has been integral in the investment leadership of the business for several years, and this transition formalizes our existing collaborative structure. Going forward, I'll continue to serve as chairman of SOX and co-president and co-chief investment officer of the broader 6G platform. As part of this evolution, Bo has joined SOX's board of directors. It has been a privilege over the lifetime to lead the company. I'm incredibly proud of what we have accomplished together and even more excited about what lies ahead under Bo's leadership. With that, let's turn to this quarter's results. After the market closed yesterday, we reported third quarter adjusted net investment income of 53 cents per share or an annualized return on equity of 12.3%, an adjusted net income of 46 cents per share or an annualized return on equity of 10.8%. As presented in our financial statements, our Q3 net investment income and net income per share, inclusive of the unwind of the non-cash accrued capital gain incentive fee expense, were a penny per share higher than the adjusted figures. The difference between adjusted net investment income and adjusted net income of 7 cents per share was largely related to the reversal of net unrealized gains in the balance sheet related to investment realizations. Yesterday, our board approved a base quarterly dividend of 46 cents per share at the shareholders of record as of December 15th, payable on December 31st. Our board also declared a supplemental dividend of 3 cents per share related to our Q3 earnings to shareholders of record as of November 28th, payable on December 19th. Net asset value per share adjusted for the impact of the supplemental dividend that was declared yesterday, $17.11. Since the start of the interest rate hiking cycle in early 2022, our net asset value per share has grown by 1.9%, representing a significant outperformance compared to the average decline of 8.5% for our public BDC peers through Q2. Focusing specifically on the last 12 months, this outperformance has continued, with SOS delivering NAV stability while other public BDC peers experienced an average decline of 2.8% through Q2. While dividend policies vary across industry, SOX's outperformance remains largely consistent, whether measured by reported net asset value per share or net asset value adjusted for supplemental and special dividends. Before passing it to Beau, I wanted to touch on one topic addressed in our letter, which is the stock market performance of the BDC sector. We view the September sell-off as a net positive for our industry. Let me be clear. We do not believe the market move is credit-related for us or the sector broadly. As we said in our last earnings call, we think credit issues are generally behind the industry. Our view is that the market woke up to the reality that the sector has been allocating capital based on a backward-looking view of higher-yielding backbooks in an elevated interest rate environment. This was the premise of our letter to shareholders in April, which illustrated four ROEs falling below the industry's cost of equity capital. While we believe this capital misallocation will have both near and long-term effects, in the short term, we expect to see dividend cuts across the industry as net investment income falls below dividend levels. For SOX, we continue to over-earn our base dividend with 114% coverage in Q3, allowing us to pay another supplemental dividend based on this quarter's over-earning. Long term, we believe downward pressure on BDC stocks will constrain further capital raising, specifically in the non-traded perpetually offered vehicles. For a number of managers, investors can simply buy the same or very similar product in a listed format at a discounted net asset value with daily liquidity. While this will take time to play out, we see this as an effective market correcting mechanism to addressing imbalance between supply and demand of capital that we have been talking about for several quarters. Ultimately, we believe this will create net negative flows for direct lending, similar to the experience in the listed and non-traded REIT products that occurred following the rate hiking cycle beginning in late 2022. There is more on this in my letter, but to wrap it up, we are optimistic that this environment will underscore the critical importance of manager selection in driving long-term shareholder value. With that, I'll now pass it over to Bo to discuss this quarter's investment activities.

Thank you, Josh. It's a pleasure to be your long-term partner in our business, and I'm energized by the opportunity to serve as co-CEO. My focus is simple, to continue executing the same discipline strategy and uphold the investor-first culture that has defined our success from day one. Turning now to the operating environment during the quarter, competition in direct lending markets remained elevated, fueled by persistent oversupply of capital, in historically tight spreads in the liquid credit markets. With broadly syndicated loan spreads reaching their lowest levels since the great financial crisis, borrowers have been active refinancing into public markets to capture lower funding costs. Tightened BSL competition and muted M&A activity have led to sustained spread compression across the private credit landscape. Against that backdrop, we provided total commitments of $388 million and total fundings of $352 million across four new investments, five upsizes to existing portfolio companies, and through selective deployment into structured credit investments. A key differentiator for SLX is that all four of our new investments were thematic off-the-run transactions, which we defined as uniquely sourced opportunities that require a combination of deep sector expertise, a differentiated capital solution, and the ability to commit in size to drive the transaction. These investments, which are driven by our thematic sourcing engine, create a unique portfolio for SLX shareholders relative to the sector, which largely focuses on conventional sponsor-backed direct lending transactions. An example of a thematic nontraditional transaction in Q3, which was also our largest funding for the quarter, was our investment in Walgreens. Sixth Street acted as an administrative agent and joint leader ranger on a $2.5 billion term loan to support the financing of Walgreens' U.S. retail business as part of Sycamore Partners' broader $23.7 billion take private of Walgreens Food Alliance. Our decades-long relationship with the sponsor, built on a track record of successful retail ABL deals, was instrumental in us leading the transactions. Our expertise in retail ABL space made us a credible partner to deliver a successful execution for what we believe was the largest non-bank ABL deal ever and also the largest retail buyout of all time. This transaction exemplifies our ability to create value for shareholders through differentiated investment opportunities. Our second largest investment during the quarter was a thematic investment in Velocity Clinical Research. Velocity is the world's largest fully integrated site management organization, which provides clinical trial facilities and site-based trial management services. The opportunity was driven by cross-platform effort across 6th Street and our longstanding relationship with the company's sponsor. It aligns with our pharma services sub-theme and followed an extended engagement in which we iterated on multiple structures to deliver a bespoke capital solution for the business. Our dedicated healthcare sector team continues to differentiate our ability to source and underwrite these off-the-run transactions. This investment extends a track record that has been a key contributor to SLX's returns, including prior investments in Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals and Biohaven that have generated alpha for shareholders. During the quarter, we opportunistically invested $100 million in BB-rated CLO liabilities. These investments, while representing a compelling use of capital at the time given the return profile, are not reflective of a change in the core investment approach or long-term strategy. We view these investments as an effective way to deploy capital, particularly given that in the current tighter spread environment, we can purchase double BCO liabilities at wider spreads than regular way direct lending loans, which are also subject to refinancing risk. Our Q3 CLO investments reflect a weighted average spread of 554 basis points. To the extent we see a shift in the relative value, the liquid nature of these investments allows us to rotate out of the positions. Our expertise in the structured credit market is underscored by our track record of investing in CLO liabilities, which has generated a weighted average IRR and MOM of 27.1% and 1.24X respectively for SLX shareholders. This track record is driven by Sixth Street's deep expertise in liquid credit markets demonstrated by having deployed approximately 16 billion in structured credit investments with an additional 13 billion in 30 CLOs managed by a team of 27 investment and research professionals. We believe this capability further highlights the benefits of the broader Sixth Street platform in terms of providing SLX with differentiated deployment opportunities. Looking ahead, we do not foresee a broad-based recovery in M&A activity in the near term. We expect spreads to remain tight as the supply of capital continues to outplace demand. In this environment, our thematic sourcing continues to drive origination, and the breadth of 6G's platform helps mitigate the effects of late market tightening. This is evidenced by our weighted average spread on new floating rate investments excluding structured credit investments of 700 basis points in Q3. While we do not have Q3 peer data available, this compares to a spread of 549 basis points on new issue first lien loans for public BDC peers in Q2. Moving on to repayment activity, we continue to experience elevated payoffs during the third quarter. Total repayments in Q3 were $303 million across nine full and one partial investment realization. This repayment activity was the main driver of the 14 cents per share of gross activity-based fee income earned during the quarter, which compares to our three-year historical average of 8 cents per share. To characterize this quarter's repayment activity, 75% of repayments were driven by refinancings at lower spreads in the private, credit, or broadly syndicated loan markets. The spread on refinance deals ranged from 325 to 525 basis points. We continued to adhere to our ongoing message of disciplined capital allocation demonstrated by only 12% of our investments by fair value as of quarter end, having a contractual spread below 550 basis points. To put this into perspective, as of Q2, 59% of BDC portfolios by count had spreads below 550 basis points, and we anticipate this percentage will increase further this quarter. As it relates to portfolio metrics and yields, at September 30th, the weighted average total yield on debt and income-producing securities at amortized cost was 11.7% compared to 12% as of June 30th. The decline primarily reflects the impact of change in the base rates from lower reference rates, resets, and from payoffs of higher yielding assets, excluding the yields of new investments funded during the quarter. From a vintage mix perspective, our exposure to pre-2022 vintage assets is less than half of the BDC sector. 22% of our portfolio is represented by these investments compared to 56% for the public BDC sector. We believe this is a positive differentiator for our business as a vast majority of our portfolio was originated at the start of the interest rate hiking cycle, positioning us well for the current environment. Moving on to portfolio composition and key credit stats. Across our core borrowers from whom these metrics are relevant, we continue to have conservative weighted average attach and detach points of 0.3 times and 5.2 times respectively. And our weighted average interest covers increased to 2.3x. As of Q3 2025, the weighted average revenue in EBITDA of our core portfolio companies was 376 million and 113 million respectively. Medium revenue in EBITDA were 150 million and 46 million respectively. Finally, overall portfolio performance is strong. with weighted average rating of 1.12 on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the strongest. We have two portfolio companies on non-accrual status representing 0.6% of the portfolio by fair value, reflecting no change from the prior quarter. Both of these investments included in the five rated category. With that, I'd like to turn it over to my partner, Ian, to cover our financial performance in more detail.

Thank you both. For Q3, we generated adjusted net investment income per share of 53 cents and adjusted net income per share of 46 cents. Total investments were $3.4 billion, up slightly from $3.3 billion in the prior quarter as a result of net funding activity. Total principal debt outstanding at quarter end was $1.9 billion and net assets were $1.6 billion or $17.14 per share prior to the impact of the supplemental dividend that was declared yesterday. Our average debt to equity ratio was 1.1 times down from 1.2 times in the prior quarter. Our ending debt to equity ratio increased from one spot zero nine times to one spot one five times quarter over quarter. We continue to have significant liquidity for the size of our balance sheet with nearly 1.1 billion of unfunded revolver capacity at quarter end against 174 million of unfunded portfolio company commitments eligible to be drawn. As of September 30, our funding mix was represented by 67% unsecured debt, and we have no near-term maturities, with our nearest obligation being $300 million of unsecured notes not occurring until August 2026. Consistent with previous quarters, we did not issue any shares through our ATM program during Q3. While SLX trades at a meaningful premium to net asset value, which presents the opportunity to grow our asset base by issuing equity, We remain steadfast in our commitment to disciplined capital allocation. We will only seek to access the ATM program when we identify compelling near-term investment opportunities that allow us to maintain our target leverage and when issuance is accrued to both NAV and earnings per share. Our guiding principle is to do what we should do rather than simply what we can do. We believe this disciplined approach as it relates to capital management has earned the trust of our investors and delivered consistent performance. We are committed to upholding that trust by prioritizing accretive growth and responsible capital management. Pivoting to our presentation materials, slide eight contains this quarter's NAV bridge. Walking through the main drivers of NAV growth, we added 53 cents per share from adjusted net investment income against our base dividend of 46 cents per share. There was a 8 cents per share reduction to NAV as we reversed net unrealized gains on the balance sheet related to investment realizations and recognized these gains into this quarter's income. The reversal of unrealized gains this quarter was primarily driven by early payoffs resulting in accelerated OID and call protection. There was a small one cent per share positive impact to NAV, primarily from the effect of tightening credit market spreads on the fair value of our portfolio. And finally, there was one penny per share of net realized gains, mainly from our equity realization in Clarity Technologies. Moving on to our operating results detail on slide nine, we generated $109.4 million of total investment income for the quarter, compared to $115 million in the prior quarter. Interest and dividend income was $95.2 million, down slightly from prior quarter, primarily driven by the decline in interest income from lower base rates. Other fees representing prepayment fees and accelerated amortization of upfront fees from unscheduled paydowns were lower at $6.8 million compared to $10.2 million in the prior quarter, driven by the elevated prepayment fees including Arrowhead in Q2. Other income was $7.4 million, down slightly from $7.6 million in the prior quarter. Net expenses, excluding the impact of the non-cash reversal related to unwind of capital gains incentive fees, were $58.4 million, down from $61.4 million in the prior quarter, primarily driven by lower interest expense. Our weighted average interest rate on average debt outstanding decreased from 6.3% to 6.1%. This was the result of a slight decline in base rates quarter over quarter and lower average debt outstanding in Q3. While liability sensitivity is limited for BDCs, we believe SLX is best positioned to benefit in a falling interest rate environment given our liability structure is entirely floating rate in nature. We estimate undistributed income of approximately $1.30 per share at quarter end. As always, we will continue to review the level of undistributed income as the tax year progresses to ensure we comply with the RIC distribution requirements. minimize potential return on equity drag from the excise taxes, and prioritize returns to our shareholders. We believe there is a misconception that spillover income protects the dividend. However, using spillover to cover the dividend simply reduces net asset value. This is a return of capital, not a return on capital, and ultimately diminishes shareholder value if earnings don't support the payout. Philosophically, If we can generate a return on that retained capital that is in excess of the cost of that capital, our shareholders will benefit through greater economic return. If we were below our leverage target, which we are not, and the cost of funder distribution was lower than the excise tax rate, which it is not, we could theoretically create more value for shareholders by distributing that spillover income. Given these conditions, and not present today, and we continue to meet our distribution obligations through our existing dividend framework. We believe retaining this capital remains the most appropriate way to generate value for our shareholders. Before turning it back to Josh, I'd like to briefly provide an update on our ROEs. At the beginning of this year, we communicated an annualized ROE target range of 11.5% to 12.5% based on our expectations over the intermediate term for our net asset level yields, cost of funds, and financial leverage. Based on our performance this year through Q3, we expect adjusted NII per share for the full year to be at the top end of our previously stated range of $1.97 to $2.14 per share for the full year. The potential to exceed the top end of that range will be driven by activity-based fees. With that, I'll turn it back to Josh for concluding remarks.

Thank you, Ian. That's pretty long-winded in my letter. but I still encourage all of you to read it. And as a result, I'll keep my conclusion brief and pass the baton to Beau. As a proud shareholder, we're in the right hand to drive our platform forward. Our heartfelt thank you to all of our stakeholders. It's been an honor. The greatest pleasure of the seat was learning from all of you. It made me and SLX better. A special thanks to my co-founding partners who trusted me with our public vehicle, our pre-IPO shareholders, and all of our shareholders over the last 11 plus years. I wanted to say thank you to Mike Fishman. I've worked with Mike for the better part of 25 years. Mike has been a mentor, a partner, and most importantly, a friend. Thanks, Mike. With that, over to Bo.

Thanks again, Josh. I'll close where we started. Today's leadership update doesn't change how we run the business or our capital priorities. We remain focused on discipline underwriting, proactive portfolio management, and delivering consistent investor-first results. We have great continuity with Ian and Craig Hamra, and of course, the next generation of talent. I have immense confidence in our team and the platform we've built, and I look forward to driving the next chapter of value creation for our shareholders. Thank you for your continued support. With that, thank you for your time today. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Thank you. At this time, we will conduct the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again, and please stand by while we compile our Q&A roster. Our first question will be coming from Brian McKenna of Citizens. Your line is open, Brian.

Okay, thanks. Good morning, everyone. First off, Bo, congrats on the new role. And Josh, I just wanted to say thank you for all the genuine perspectives and insights on these calls over the years. Um, so my first, so my first question is on the theme of evolving businesses over time. I wasn't totally shocked by the announcement last night. Um, although it also wasn't on my bingo card for third quarter results. Um, but Josh, Josh, it would just be helpful to get your perspective on why it's so important to have a deep bench, to always be thinking about the next generation of leaders. why it's critical to have such a strong culture, and really how all of this has played into the natural evolution of 6th Street over the past 15 plus years.

Yeah. Hey, Brian, it's a great question. Look, these things might seem kind of abrupt, shocking, or a surprise to the outsiders, but the reality is, you know, I think Bo's been, this process started eight years ago. Bo was named president in 2016, so nine years ago, whatever that math is. Ian's been here 10 years, but we started this transition, uh, you know, eight to nine years ago, or the beginning part of this transition. And when I look at, and it was only fair to Bo and the team to, you know, continue on that path and give them space to run. I ultimately, this is a people business and culture matters and I think what we've done is build a very, very strong culture around our franchise and around our shareholder orientation and Bo embodies that and he's going to continue that. I'm super pumped as a shareholder, super pumped as Bo's partner to see Bo and then quite frankly, the generation behind that because at some point, Bo will have to make that choice on who the generation is. I'm sure he'll do that in a collaborative way with me and my other partners, but he's going to have to make that choice and You know, this is, our shareholders have given us permanent capital. With that permanent capital comes the responsibility of building a culture that allows for these generational changes in leadership. Unlike a, you know, LPGP relationship, which those are, you know, relatively short-dated, five to 10 years, and it doesn't depend on having the next generation of leadership. So that is a responsibility for leaders of these permanent capital vehicles and make sure you have succession planning and make sure you build a culture where people can step up and we've done it. But I think it's different than the typical limited partnership relationship because these are permanent capital vehicles that belong to our shareholder and the shareholder trusts that we do this.

Got it. That's really helpful. Thanks, Josh. And then just a question on private wealth. I know this is extremely topical, but how is Sixth Street thinking about expanding into this channel? I'm assuming this is something you and your partners are thinking about a lot. And I know if you ultimately roll out a dedicated strategy, it will be in typical Sixth Street fashion. But what could this look like? I'm assuming you'll have to figure out a way to solve and really be able to prudently raise and deploy capital. But is there a way to create a strategy that caps quarterly or annual inflows? And then you're also able to invest across asset classes depending on the current risk rewards in the market. Any thoughts here would be helpful.

Yeah, I mean, look, I think, you know, it's obviously, you know, I talked about this in my letter in depth. You know, it's probably not, I would say, you know, we think about it, we debate it. You know, there's not a conclusion today. But if we did something, it would have to be in a different way. Uh, that, you know, I, I'm, I'm, I'm, I like the idea. And I said this on the last one is called the thought of the democratization of all allowing that the small investor access to great management and those stream of returns. I'm not sure the market has figured out how to actually give them the, give that investor the institutional. experience. And if we ever did something in the space, it would have to be to give them the institutional experience. And, you know, quite frankly, we haven't figured out exactly how to do that yet.

All right, I'll leave it there. Thanks so much.

So much. Thanks, brother.

And our next question will be coming from Finian O'Shea of Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open.

Hey, everyone. Good morning and congrats again on the promotions, leadership changes, and so forth. Just a small follow-up on that. Can you talk about how the focus may change? Josh, you'll remain CIO or co-CIO of the platform. Are you still focused on direct lending, or will it be something else? And then, Beau, I think you were, correct me if I'm wrong, split between the growth business and this. Will it be full-on on this or anything else in there interesting on what your day-to-day will be like?

Thanks. I don't expect either one of our day-to-day changes and I'll let Bo answer it for himself. What I love personally is investing. I'm going to continue to be an active member and voice on the drug lending investment committees, And so I don't expect anything to change. I think it's also, again, it's hard to see from the outside, but this, you know, day to day, this is pretty consistent with how we operate today. And so I, you know, again, you know, if I've made one mistake and if I can be self-critical for a second, you know, I've probably been more of a voice and an outside voice compared to how we operate. And the reality is how we operate the business is, you know, how it's going to operate going forward, which is, you know, I spend my time trying to invest and be helpful on the investing side and think about risk return. And, you know, so I don't think anything's massively changing. And, you know, on Bo, Bo can talk about how his responsibilities on growth changes, but, you know, I don't see that massively changing either.

Thanks, Josh, and thanks for the question, Tim. As Josh mentioned, I don't see a big change in my day-to-day responsibilities. The framework for this transition has been in place for quite some time, and as Josh mentioned, started nine years ago. I'll continue to split my time with growth. The great news there is, you know, Finn, I think you and I have spoken about this before, there's a lot of synergies across those portfolios. and a lot to learn by being across both of those businesses. I'll be spending more time with you all. I look forward to that. I look forward to driving the business forward and continuing on, you know, the journey that we've been on for quite some time. But day-to-day activities, I don't expect a vast change.

Yeah, I mean, this is a little bit of a joke, and it's surely not going to show up well in the transcript, but both getting the worst part of the transition is which is public earnings calls and, you know, tossing with you all, which makes us better ultimately. But, you know, I'm glad Bo is taking that off my plate, and I'm sure I'll do a better job than I have.

But we'll keep leaning on him here for these calls, though.

And we'll see who will do the shareholder letters as well. I mean, we might be happy to go away, but... Just a follow-up on the... I think, Beau, you gave color on the CLO liabilities. Is that something you're continuing to do, given it doesn't seem like direct lending spreads are bouncing back imminently? And these are... I think it was somewhere in the 550s you said, it's not like that's out of the park. So if you tie that to the spillover math you gave, does the sort of marginal dollar, the CLO debt investment, make sense to support through the marginal sort of source of capital that is spillover income? And yeah, I'll leave it at that.

Yeah, I'll take it. First of all, let me take a step back because I think it's helpful. We have a huge dedicated structured credit team and probably syndicated loan team. And if you look at the performance of both those teams, it's out of this park, top that's out. We're very good in those markets. And When, and so we have a structural edge where you see we've invested in this asset class and over time in the BBC, I think our average return in the twenties, uh, when we've done it, obviously it's not going to be a 20% return, but when you look at, and so you start there and our choices were just to put it out there, the marginal economics are a lot better than the spread because It would have, you know, it would have filled a investment income hole and was accretive to earnings this quarter, you know, you know, by probably a penny or so. And so, you know, is this a, and I don't expect it to grow. We're at, uh, what a hundred million today, you know, which is a very small part of air balance sheet or balance sheets doing half billion and a very small part of our capital. So I don't expect it to grow. But is it a nice placeholder and a relative value trade? The answer is 100%. And so, you know, what we don't want to do is tie up capital in long-dated illiquid 450 things that won't give us the opportunity to drive value and create that anti-fragility that we have over time. And, you know, the great thing about this is A, they're higher spread and B, they're liquid. And so, you know, they're, it works on a marginal basis. It surely works on a risk adjusted return basis and it's liquid. And so we get to change our mind when there's other opportunities. Awesome. Thank you so much. Thanks, Finn. Hey, Finn, personally, I want to say to you and Wells Fargo and your predecessor, thanks. And this is not calling out anybody else, but, you know, you guys have been at this for a long time covering the sector. And the work you've done is, I think, been extremely additive to the sector where the sector needs, you know, transparency. And so thanks, you've made us better, you've made the sector better, you and the institution and your predecessors, so thank you for that.

Okay. And our next question will be coming from Melissa Waddell of JP Morgan. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats again to both Beau and Josh on your maybe just formalizing the roles that have sort of been evolving that way for a long time. Wanted to follow up on credit. Obviously, there have been a lot of concerns about credit quality across the industry. And I think especially those have picked up, those fears have picked up in the last month or so. I think we heard a lot from investors about concerns around their pocket of weakness around auto in particular. We saw a couple of headlines there. It sounds like you're not especially concerned about any particular pockets of weakness, but it's more an issue of pricing and supply of capital in the market. Is that a fair characterization?

Yeah, I think that is fair. I think generally credit issues are behind. The idiosyncratic stuff will pop up. know who i love and respect a lot your boss had made a comment about uh ultimate boss made a comment about uh uh credit i think he was referring to generally credit and not private credit so i think you know one of my you know contemporaries took the bait on that and the story kind of got wild but what i would say is when you look at those instances that have been reported in the news That was not private credit. That was the broadly syndicated loan market that's been around for 30 or 40 years. And then was the other, I think, bank's balance sheets. And so I think private credit generally does a good job because the model is different where we do private equity. I can't speak for everybody, but I think the industry generally leans this way. It's slightly more concentrated. It's not fractional. They don't manage it as fractional risk. They manage it as idiosyncratic risk. They do private equity style due diligence. And I think that where people have got burned is they think about and not about idiosyncratic and they lose focus on the individual credit underwriting and diligence and they lean into the fractional nature of their portfolios and then bad things can happen. So I actually think this is a good check mark for private credit, at least in those two names that were public.

Thanks for that, Josh. You know, you just mentioned transparency, and that's also something you talked about in your shareholder letter. You know, I'm curious what you think that looks like. You think there's room for additional transparency across the industry. So what does that mean, and is that something TSLX could be taking the lead on? Thank you.

I actually think there's – look, when you look at the ecosystem of public BDCs, there's a decent amount of transparency, right? You have radio agencies, equity research analysts, and you have this process that provides tension and transparency. And what I was talking about was really transparency in the non-traded perpetually offered space or private space or those products. You don't have the equity research analysts You know, with buy cells, you don't have morning star yet with, you know, ratings on fund managers, like you do in, in mutual funds. And so the, there is, I think my hope is that transparency comes through that space and that space evolves from being, you know, what's being sold today to a space that's being actively bought. You can't have something actively bought without transparency. And so I think that evolution will take time. But, you know, I think I had heard, and it's going to be slightly unpopular, I think I had heard that my economics were wrong on or somebody said it came back to me to me to a reporter that my economics were, you know, wrong on the non traded space. And I'm in and that isn't exactly right. Because what it might that space might have lower management fees at the any level, but they have other fees that the investor eats a trailer on a dividend, etc. And so my math is exactly right in that space, too. But it's marketed different. And so I think there needs to be just time will happen. It will happen. It will happen slowly. It won't happen as fast as we want. But transparency is going to be the key to what economics ultimately eat, what investors ultimately eat and risk reward. And so I think that it already is in our space because you're on the phone asking questions and hard questions. investors don't have that process or that content on the non-traded space.

And one more question. Our next question will be coming from Aaron Zyganovich of Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Thank you. You know, maybe we could talk a little bit about the balance of, I guess, seeking yield. Um, you know, you, you have a few kind of unique investments this quarter and in CLOs and in ABL, um, with, you know, the traditional part of your business. And, and I don't know, I, I, historically when I think about, um, you know, spreads getting tight and loan yields getting tight, um, you know, as, as folks are looking to maintain that yield, you take on more credit risk. Um, maybe you could just talk a little bit about the balance of, of kind of the types of deals you're doing and what the risk profiles are relative to, you know, doing your kind of more played vanilla.

Um, you know, uh, I'll, I'll, I'll, I'll turn over the boat. We doing nothing different. ABL, has always been part of our portfolio. Like real-life returns, it's been an alpha-generating part of our portfolio. It literally provides only alpha, no additional credit risk. That's the historical math. We're navigating complexity. That has been our story. The great thing about the middle market and about investment is that it's still pretty inefficient, which is you can have, like SLX has, higher asset-level returns and lower losses. We have losses that are a fraction of the industry. We have had unlevered returns that are somewhere between 100 and 300 basis points higher than the industry. And so I would argue with the premise that we're taking, that we've taken more risk on the structured credit piece. That's double B. That probably has a WARF score, so weight average rating factor, that is, you know, somewhere between three and seven times less than the average in the idiosyncratic credit, which is probably somewhere between triple C and B minus in the middle market. And so it is that I think the premise is, is wrong, we actually have been risk adjusted seeking versus risk seeking. And you know, we've probably, we've most definitely, as it relates to structured credit investments, have reduced risk, not increased risk.

I don't know, Beau, you have anything to add? No, like, Aaron, thanks for the question. The only thing I would add is we have not changed anything. I highlighted our two, two of our two larger thematic originations during the quarter. Those are both themes that we've been pursuing for quite some time, five years plus on each of these themes. Our other two originations were deeply thematic. We continue to be very disciplined in this environment. It's with supply, demand, and balance, but we're not changing how we underwrite credit, how we think through credit, and how we structure credit.

Thank you. I appreciate that.

And our next question will be coming from Kenneth Lee of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Echo the congrats, Bo, on the new role. And Josh, it's been great working with you. And I hope you'll continue to be an outside voice and continue to share your industry insights going forward. One question I had, and what's really interesting from the letter here, you highlighted that TSLX has a much lower beta than the BDC peers. Wondering if you have any thoughts on what could have been contributors historically for that lower beta, especially given the outsized returns TSLX has been generating. Thanks.

Yeah, I think that's a function of credit losses. The beta on stock price, my guess, comes with blowups on credit. And we've had, you know, we've had 20% less beta than space, 20% less beta than the, you know, public equities. And, you know, beta comes from, you know, surprises. Those surprises are asymmetrical in credit. And, you know, we've done a good job of not having surprises.

Gotcha. Very helpful there. And one follow-up, if I may, wondering if you could just give us any kind of update thoughts around expectations for prepayments, especially given your expectations for M&A activity. Thanks.

Sure, I'll take that one. Thanks for the question. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks last quarter, We had elevated repayment activity, which has been the trend over the last couple of quarters. I think we generated 14 cents per share in activity-based fee income versus a historical average of 8 cents per share. It's a little early in the quarter to have the clearest picture, but what I would expect is that activity-based fee income to be closer to the norm this quarter. But as I mentioned, it's a little early. We usually have 30 to 60 days visibility on the forward of repayment activity. The great news, I think, as you've looked at our earnings historically, in quarters that there is less activity-based income, less repayment activity, we're able to grow interest rates we're able to grow, drive leverage, and drive interest income through the P&L.

Great. Hopefully that answers it. Thanks again. Yep, no, that answers it. Thanks again.

Thank you. And our next question will be coming from Robert Dodd of Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hello, everybody. Congratulations on the title, though, and condolences on inheriting the earnings calls. And, Josh, congratulations to you for getting off the treadmill. And hopefully your coach's advice on making your own luck continues to inspire you. On not related to the ladder, the largest deal this quarter, as you said, was Walgreens. It was an ABL. If there is credit concern in the market right now, it seems more around collateral monitoring, in my opinion. It's collateral monitoring and collateral quality when, you know, is a vehicle asset double pledged? Is a receivable real or not? So when you look at an asset-based structure, how do you make sure, right? It's kind of a softball question for both of us, I think, all. How do you make sure that your collateral is real? Because that has been a fall down in a couple of these credit, idiosyncratic credit instances that we've seen over the last couple of months.

Yeah, sure. I'll take that one, and then Josh or even Mike can add in. First of all, I would say this is a core competency of the platform. We've been doing this for over 20-plus years now. monitoring ABL collateral, understanding ABL collateral, understanding how it would liquidate. Our team is very focused on inventory counts, inventory appraisals, having those in a timely fashion, monitoring that borrowing base on a monthly, if not more frequent basis to understand where we're at in the collateral picture. We have an excellent track record in the sector. I believe we have over 20% IRRs historically in the retail ABL. You don't do that by happenstance. You do it by understanding who your borrowers are, what that collateral picture is, and monitoring that on a day-to-day basis. But it is a core competency. We have a whole team that this is what they're focused on, and we have a lot of confidence in them. Josh, Mike, anything to add?

Look, obviously we weren't a part of those names. So that tells you something about the score competency for us. The second thing I would say is both exactly right, which is this ABL loan, the predominant collateral is inventory in the stores where you're doing collateral audits to match inventory counts. and with GL, and you're making sure that there is no discrepancy. And so these are physical things. I would suspect if both those two instances, if people were reconciling cash to receivables, which we would have done, they would have picked up on it pretty quickly because the way that a fraud exists is that people create receivables, and by definition, those receivables have no cash collections against them. And so if you would have been doing your work, you would have saw the no cash collections or high dilution, and you would have sniffed it out.

Thank you for that. On your off-the-bump pipeline, I mean, over time, how... How fast do you think that kind of segment of the market can grow? Obviously, I mean, people put, to your point, the perpetuals, the market opportunity, people put big growth numbers on it, but that comes at the expense of a lot of spread compression. For your more off-the-run type deals where you are getting these higher spreads and you're getting more unique assets and often more free income, how fast is that? How penetrated are you in that market and what's the opportunity there for TSLX to continue to grow in a very controlled manner?

Yeah, look, I mean, A, we're not focused on growth. We're focused on shareholder returns. So I just want to put that out there. We're focused on shareholder returns and having the right architecture, which is managing the right amount of capital for the opportunity set. So what people are wrong now is that there's the same amount of those opportunities because we don't need to grow. And I think the one thing that people keep missing over and over again, and part of it is how they frame their business, which is growth, The only thing that really matters for industries, a growth or earnings or growth and earnings as it relates to a unit of economic interest, so a share. Like, you know, if you grow revenues by 20% or grow earnings by 20% and share count by 20 or 25%, you haven't created shareholder value. And so, you know, we're focused on creating shareholder value, which means that we might not grow. Fair enough. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will be coming from Paul Johnson of KBW. Your line is open.

Yeah, thanks. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Not to sound redundant on any of the management changes. I think they've been pretty well covered. But just wanted to ask, you know, as a part of those changes, were there any changes to the overall credit committee, investment committee, and any of the processes around that. Yeah, yeah. Got it. And I'd be curious to get your thoughts. I mean, just, you know, you guys have obviously made a lot of thematic investments in the software space and been very active there. Maybe it would be just good to hear kind of your thoughts on just the overall AI risk and concern and whether that's kind of the risk or opportunity that you see within the portfolio?

Yeah, I'll take that one. I'm going to start off by saying the portfolio continues to perform very well, both software and non-software names. We have not seen any impact today as it relates to AI to any of the software names. With that, I think the impact of AI is nuanced and still evolving. There's going to be a lot more questions than answers right now in the sector. I personally believe it will be a net positive for the sector overall, but it will be deeply nuanced. There's going to be winners and losers, just like there were winners and losers from the transition from on-prem to cloud-native businesses. I think what's important is this is a sector that we've been active in for two-plus decades, dating all the way back to Mike Fishman, who I think was one of the original folks that had a thesis around their credit quality. We focus then and now on businesses that have high switching costs, durable data modes, and provide meaningful downside protection in that they own their customer base, They have a very, you know, they own the distribution, if you will, of the customers, which is still, you know, a high barrier to entry. But as I mentioned, it is going to be evolving. I think the important thing is you think about the forward and not the historic, and that's where we're focused not only in portfolio management, but also in new opportunities. But, you know, that's my thoughts on the space. Mike, you should add anything or Josh.

No, I think, I think Bo hit it, which is, you know, AI will level the playing field on developer costs. And, but the reality is there's other modes and capital is never a real long-term mode of a business. And so it reduced the capital intensity of creating software, but that wasn't the most, the motor, the moat was data integration, you know, workflow. And so, you know, I think, I think that is, you know, capital is never a moat around a, or a competitive advantage or a barrier to entry. And what AI has done is just reduced the capital intensity, but that's never a moat. And we've always focused on the moats.

Got it. Appreciate it. It was, and appreciate the answer there. And last one for me, I would just be curious to hear, just recognizing spreads didn't change all that much during the month of October, but kind of around the time of just the negative credit headlines and the bankruptcy announcements in the month, I'd just be curious to hear if there were any sort of Bad balance sheet opportunities exposed or anything that was, you know, able to create kind of unique deal flow for the fourth quarter?

Yeah, I mean, I think there are things in our pipeline that are, like, very unique and that are thematic and complicated. You know, we committed to a large financing for a company that's coming out of a bankruptcy. that is in the energy infrastructure sector that like in that, you know, at some point we'll, you know, fund in Q4, Q1 of next year. And so there's some unique stuff that, you know, we continue to find that is consistent with our model, which is find things that is less trafficked, which requires industry knowledge, where we have an edge, or where we have a theme. And so, you know, you'll see some of that stuff in the next quarter, too.

That's right.

Thank you. And our next question will be coming from Mickey Schlin of Clear Street, LLC. Your line is open.

Yes, good morning, everyone. Like everyone else, congrats to Bo and Josh. I'm going to miss talking to you regularly. So thank you. I'm always here.

You have my number. Sorry? I'm always around. You have my number.

Yeah, I appreciate that. Josh, touching on spreads, I think there was a question recently about that. But my understanding is they actually did widen a little bit in October, which sort of makes sense given what we've seen in the market in terms of the macro and political backdrop. Do you foresee that to be sustainable, or is the large amount of capital available still just going to overwhelm the market and keep this equilibrium in place?

Yeah, I mean, spreads will be a function of flows both ways. And so I don't think we saw a material change in spreads. I mean, we found some really interesting stuff to do. So we had a higher spread, but syndicated loan spreads are tight. In October, I think, you know, they're tighter by five basis points. Maybe in the private credit market came out by basis points, but not anything in the world that's going to be functional, you know, close. So, but, you know, we've tried to, platform where, you know, we're a little insulated.

Sorry, that broke up a little bit, but I think I got most of it. I apologize, but I had to jump on late into the call. Did you mention anything about the impact of the government shutdown on the portfolio?

Yeah, we did not. It's a good question. There's no material impact in our business.

Okay, good to hear. And lastly, has Sixth Street discussed or considered listing SSLP to give those investors some liquidity?

It is kind of not on the table. We're still investing in that fund. We're halfway through the fund. We'll focus on making great investments and driving returns for those investors.

All right, thank you. Those are all my questions this morning. Again, congratulations.

This will be my last earnings poll that I'm active on, so thank you so much for everybody. I'm super excited about Bo and the leadership. Thinking back on this earnings poll, we spent a lot of time on management changes in the industry. What I do want to highlight is We had an awesome quarter. We've had an awesome year. And, you know, we found higher spread investments. We drove NII. The team has done an excellent job. And so, you know, hopefully, you know, I understand that people are focused on the headlines, but the reality is the business is in great shape And we keep on driving returns for our shareholders. I'm so excited about that. Bo, congratulations. It's well overdue. I stayed in the seat too long. And I'm excited for you. I'm excited for the platform. And, again, this is how we've operated together. And, you know, I'm around. So thank you, Bo, for being so patient with me. And I hope everybody has a great Thanksgiving with their family.

Thanks, everybody.

This concludes today's program. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.