Textron Inc.

Thank you for standing by and welcome to the Textron fourth quarter 2025 conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, again press star one. Thank you. I'd now like to turn the call over to Scott Hegstrom, Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasurer. You may begin.

Thanks, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Before we begin, I'd like to mention we will be discussing future estimates and expectations during our call today. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risk factors, which are detailed in our SEC filings and also in today's press release. On the call today, we have Scott Donnelly, our Executive Chairman, Lisa Atherton, our Chief Executive Officer, and David Rosenberg, our Chief Financial Officer. Our earnings call presentation can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Scott.

Thanks, Scott, and good morning, everyone. Textron closed out the year with another solid quarter, driven by significant revenue growth of 16% and segment profit growth of 34%, resulting in an adjusted EPS of $1.73. For the full year, Textron finished the year with revenue growth of 8% and segment profit growth of 14%, resulting in an adjusted EPS of $6.10. Looking at the segments, aviation had a strong year with revenue up 36% for the fourth quarter and 13% for the full year, reflecting higher aircraft deliveries and increased aftermarket volume as we recovered from the strike in late 2024. In the quarter, we continued to see solid order flow and customer demand across our portfolio, ending the year with $7.7 billion of backlog. In 2025, we delivered 171 jets, up from 151 last year, and 146 commercial turboprops, up from 127 last year. in 2024. Also in the quarter, we continued to upgrade the product portfolio, Citation Ascend, CJ3 Gen 2, and the M2 Gen 2 with autothrottles, all receiving FAA certification and beginning deliveries. During 2025, strong aircraft utilization within the Textron Aviation product portfolio resulted in 6% growth in aftermarket revenues. Bell also had a very strong year with revenue up 11% for the fourth quarter and 20% for the full year. At the acceleration of the MV75 program, 2025 marks Bell's second consecutive year of 20% growth in military revenue. We've talked a lot about accelerating the MV75 program in 2025. To provide some examples of our progress on this, we've completed over 90% of the engineering drawings, put nearly 2,000 Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers on contract, issuing 45,000 purchase orders, opened new manufacturing capacity in Wichita for the fuselage, and Fort Worth for the Advanced Manufacturing Center, the Drive Systems Test Lab, and the Weapons Systems Integration Lab. And we've done manufacturing components for the first six aircraft. So acceleration is not just design work, it's establishing real production capacity as we pull forward production by a couple of years. Earlier this month, we hosted the Secretary of the Army and representatives from the MV-75 Program Office at our Wichita Assembly Center, where we were building the fuselage for the aircraft. During this visit, we were able to demonstrate our production capabilities and progress on the first six aircraft that are currently in work. Across Bell's other sites, we're seeing the results of our prior investments in manufacturing process development, which led to efficient manufacturing of major parts like our wing skins and spars. On the commercial side, Bell continued to see strong order activity in 2025. For the year, Bell delivered 169 commercial helicopters compared to 172 in 2024. Moving to systems, the team also delivered revenue growth for both the quarter and the full year, with revenue up 4% in the quarter and slightly up for the full year. The team generated this revenue growth while facing headwinds that it had to overcome, including the challenging comparables resulting from the wind down in the shadow program. The ship-to-shore connection program has proven to be a real strength for the segment. We are now about 15 units into a 73-unit program record. The program has scaled up and is now running efficiently and has received over $450 million of awards this year. During the quarter, systems received an IDIQ contract valued up to $200 million for its ATAC business to provide airborne standoff jamming services to the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps. This program will support Navy fleet customers with a wide variety of airborne threat simulation capabilities to train, test, and evaluate shipboard and aircraft weapon systems. At industrial, the segment ended the year with a positive organic growth of about 1% in the fourth quarter after streamlining the portfolio with the divestiture of the power sports business. In summary, 2025 is a strong year for Textron. We continue to execute on our growth strategy of ongoing investments in new products and programs to drive organic growth and margin expansion. As we wrap up 2025, this will be my last earnings call. I want to express my thanks for all your support over the years. I feel very good about where the business stands, the team that we have in place, and the leadership that Lisa brings to the table. With that, I'll hand it off to her to talk about the business more broadly and our plans for 2026.

Thanks, Scott. And I want to extend my sincere gratitude for your exceptional leadership and your commitment to Textron over the years. And on behalf of the entire team, thank you for your many contributions and the lasting legacy that you leave. And we wish you all the very best. For those of you that may not know me, I graduated from the United States Air Force Academy. I was a contract officer and then a civilian contractor at the Directorate of Requirements at Air Combat Command. I left ACC in 2007 and joined Textron holding various leadership positions within Textron Systems and Bell. I was fortunate enough to spend several years leading systems before my last position as CEO of Bell. In these roles, I led numerous development and program activities, including the future long-range assault aircraft, now the MB-75 program. When we look across Textron, I am very excited for the opportunities that lie ahead. Textron Aviation, our largest segment, is a clear leader in general aviation with its Cessna and Beechcraft brands. It has a great product lineup, an unmatched installed base, driving a powerful aftermarket business, and world-class customers. 2025 was a very strong year for aviation, and the business is well-positioned for the future. In addition to our successful certification efforts, we continue to progress on the Beechcraft knowledge development programs. The Denali finished the year having logged over 3,200 hours of flight testing. On the defense side, Textron Aviation entered a contract to deliver the first two Beechcraft T6 to Japan's Air Self-Defense Force, with additional contracts anticipated. Deliveries of the two aircraft are scheduled for 2029. From a market perspective, the general aviation industry is very healthy. The business has nearly an $8 billion backlog, and we continue to experience strong order flow. As a result of the team's continued product innovation and operational execution, we remain at the forefront of the industry. Turning to Bell, the MV75 program continues to be a great success story. What began as internal research and development and turned into the V280 on the joint multi-role technology demonstrator program is now a core component of the Army's transformation initiative. Over the last year, we have worked closely with the Army as they accelerate the program. Bell is now poised to begin testing on the first unit later this year, deliver EMD articles throughout 2027, and then transition into LRIP deliveries in 2028. Our military opportunities are not limited to just the MV75 program. Earlier this month, Bell was notified of its selection to proceed to the next phase of the Flight School Next competition. This would be a new program to train Army aviators at Fort Rucker. This opportunity leverages our 505 helicopter and our expertise in flight training, where Bell currently trains nearly 2,000 pilots per year at the Bell Training Academy. Because of our long-term investment strategy, our defense and commercial product mix, and our agility in adapting to and embracing acceleration with a wartime footing mentality, we think Textron is demonstrating the characteristics valued by the Department of War in support of the arsenal of freedom. As I mentioned, I previously ran Textron Systems as well and believe that this business has long been one of the cool kids in the defense industry. We developed and have been flying unmanned systems for over 25 years with more than 2 million flight hours on our platforms. We developed our first unmanned surface vehicle in 2007. We have manufactured and fielded high temperature materials that operate in hypersonic environments dating back to the 1960s. We are currently on Mars as part of the Perseverance rover, Our technology is being utilized on the heat shield for Orion as it prepares to travel to the moon, and we are developing the reentry vehicle system for Sentinel, as well as working on various other hypersonic applications. We are also ramping our land offerings in support of the Ukraine with our MSFV platform, which is part of the Commando family, and continuing development on major opportunities like the Armed Reconnaissance Vehicle and the XM-30. We also have proven commercial business models that have demonstrated across multiple platforms, including Aerothond and ATAC, which are directly applicable to opportunities like Flight School Next. Thanks to our leading edge capabilities and recent program wins, Textron Systems is well positioned to drive future growth. Moving to industrial, the teams at Caltechs and TSV have done a good job executing and dealing with challenging end markets. At Caltechs, the hybrid volumes continue to grow, And due to our investments in the pentatonic offerings, we are gaining more exposure to pure electric vehicles. In fact, the pentatonic offerings present the opportunity for both fuel tank and battery enclosure revenue on hybrid platforms. At TSV, the team continues to introduce new products and work to address the cost structure. For example, TSV rolled out the Cushman Hauler XL with larger hauling capacity. And at EasyGo, our PACE technology is expanding beyond golf into new markets. Before we move to the outlook for 2026, I want to highlight that our $14.8 billion of revenue in 2025 is the highest we have ever had as a company. In 2026, we're projecting revenues of about $15.5 billion, up about 4.5% from 2025 for Textron's 2026 fiscal year. We are projecting adjusted EPS in the range of $6.40 to $6.60. Manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions is expected to be in the range of $700 million to $800 million. This cash flow outlook reflects approximately $350 million of higher capex and long-lead material to support LRIP on the MV75 program. With that, I'll turn the call over to David to walk you through a recap of 2025 financials and the 2026 outlook.

Thank you, Lisa, and good morning, everyone. First, Scott, I would like to echo Lisa's comments and extend my gratitude to you as well. It has been a pleasure working with you over the years. Turning to slide five of the earnings presentation, revenues in the quarter were $4.2 billion, up 16% or $562 million from last year's fourth quarter. Segment profit in the quarter was $380 million, up 34% or $97 million from the fourth quarter of 2024. During this year's fourth quarter, adjusted income from continuing operations was $1.73 per share compared to $1.34 per share in last year's fourth quarter. Manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions totaled 510 million in the quarter, up 204 million from last year's fourth quarter. For the full year, revenues were 14.8 billion, up 8%, or 1.1 billion from last year. In 2025, segment profit was 1.4 billion, up 14%, or 163 million from 2024. Adjusted income from continuing operations was $6.10 per share, as compared to $5.48 per share in 2024. Manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions was $969 million, up $277 million from 2024. Now on slide six, let's review how each of the segments contributed, starting with Textron Aviation. Revenues at Textron Aviation reflecting higher aircraft revenues of $400 million and higher aftermarket parts and service revenues of $67 million. The increase in aircraft revenues was primarily due to higher volume in mix, largely reflecting higher citation jet and commercial turboprop volume as we recovered from the strike in 2024. Segment profit was $208 million in the fourth quarter, up $108 million compared with the fourth quarter of 2024, largely due to higher volume in mix. On a full year basis, Textron Aviation generated revenue of $6 billion, up 13% over the prior year, and $694 million of segment profit, up 23% from 2024, backlogging the segment end of the year at $7.7 billion. Revenues at Bell of $1.3 billion were up $128 million, or 11% from the fourth quarter of 2024. The revenue increase in the quarter was driven by higher military revenues of $139 million, primarily due to higher volume on the U.S. Army's MB-75 program, partially offset by lower commercial revenues of $11 million, reflecting the mix of aircraft sold in the period, offset in part by higher pricing. Segment profit of $101 million was down $9 million from a year ago. On a full-year basis, Bell generated revenues of $4.3 billion, up 20% over the prior year, and $363 million of segment profit, down $7 million from 2024. Backlog in the segment ended the year at $7.8 billion, an increase of over $300 million from the prior year, reflecting growth in both military and commercial businesses. At Textron Systems, revenues of $323 million were up $12 million, or 4 percent, from last year's fourth quarter, primarily due to higher volume. Segment profit of $43 million was up $1 million from last year's fourth quarter. On a full-year basis, Systems generated revenue of $1.2 billion, up slightly over the prior year, and $175 million of segment profit, up 14% from 2024. Backlog in the segment ended the year at $3.3 billion, an increase of over $700 million from the prior year, related to awards across multiple domains, including ATAC, marine systems, and land systems. Industrial revenues were $821 million, down $48 million from last year's fourth quarter. Textron specialized vehicles revenues decreased $69 million, largely reflecting a $72 million impact from the divestiture of the power sports business. Caltech's revenues increased $21 million, or 5%, largely due to a favorable impact from foreign exchange rate fluctuations. On an organic basis, industrial revenues were up slightly from last year's fourth quarter. Segment profit of $30 million was down $18 million from the fourth quarter of 2024. largely due to higher selling and administrative costs and lower volume and mix. On a full year basis, industrial generated revenue of $3.2 billion, down 9% from the prior year, or down 4% organically, and $145 million of segment profit, down $6 million from 2024. Text-run e-aviation segment revenues were $7 million in the fourth quarter of 2025, as compared to $11 million in last year's fourth quarter. And segment loss was $15 million as compared to segment loss of $22 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. On a full year basis, e-aviation generated revenue of $27 million and a segment loss of $63 million. Finance segment revenues were $18 million and profit was $13 million in the fourth quarter of 2025 as compared to segment revenues of $11 million and profit of $5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in revenues and segment profit included a $5 million gain on the disposition of non-captive assets in the fourth quarter of 2025. On a full-year basis, the finance segment generated revenue of $75 million and segment profit of $49 million. Moving below segment profit, corporate expenses were $44 million, net interest expense for the manufacturing group was $31 million, LIFO inventory provision was $84 million, and intangible asset amortization was $8 million. And the non-service component of pension and post-retirement income were $66 million. During the quarter, we repurchased approximately 2.3 million shares, returning $187 million in cash to shareholders. For the full year, we repurchased approximately 10.7 million shares, returning $822 million to shareholders. Turning now to our 2026 outlook on slide 19, we're expecting adjusted earnings per share to be in the range of $6.40 to $6.60. We are also expecting manufacturing cash flow before pension contributions to be about $700 million to $800 million. As Lisa mentioned in her remarks, this cash flow outlook reflects investing approximately $350 million of higher capex and long-lead materials to support LRIP on the MB75 program. Before we move to the segment outlook, as you may recall, Textron is eliminating Textron eAviation as a separate reporting segment, realigning the eAviation business activities across Textron Aviation, Textron Systems, and Corporate. to leverage our existing sales, business development, and engineering capabilities. Our segment-level guidance for 2026 reflects this new operating structure. In the earnings presentation that is posted on our website, we recast 2025 so you can see 2025 actuals and 2026 guidance on a comparable basis. Moving to segment outlook on slide 20, and beginning with Textron Aviation, we're expecting revenues of about $6.5 billion. Segment margin is expected to be in a range of approximately 11% to 12%. The margin range compares to Textron Aviation's 2025 recasted margin of 11.1%. Looking to Bell, we expect revenues of about $4.4 billion, reflecting low single-digit growth over 2025. We're forecasting a margin in a range of about 8% to 9%. As the MD-75 program continues to accelerate, we expect that we will be awarded the long-lead, low-rate initial production or LRIP phase of the contract in late 2026 or early 2027. Upon award of the LRIP option, which is largely fixed price, we expect to record an unfavorable cumulative catch-up program adjustment, reflecting higher costs than originally anticipated when the program was bid in 2021, in the range of $60 million to $110 million. The overall MP75 program will continue to generate a positive margin after the adjustment. In light of the uncertainty of the timing of the award, this has not been reflected in our guidance for the year. At systems, we're estimating revenues of $1.35 billion, reflecting growth of approximately 7% over 2025. Segment margin is expected to be in a range of approximately 12% to 13%. At industrial, we're expecting segment revenues of about $3.2 billion. This reflects low single-digit growth when adjusting for the power sports divestiture in 2025. Segment margin is expected to be in the range of about 4.5% to 5.5%. At finance, we are forecasting segment profit of about $20 million. Looking at slide 21, we're projecting about $180 million of corporate expenses. We're also projecting about $140 million of net interest expense for the manufacturing group, $200 million of LIFO inventory provisions, 30 million of intangible asset amortization, and 280 million of non-service pension income. We expect a full-year adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 20.5%. Turning to slide 22, R&D is expected to be about 480 million, down from 521 million last year. As I mentioned, we are estimating higher capex million, up $383 million in 2025. Our outlook assumes an average share count of about 175 million shares. So for 2026 company-wide, we expect to see revenue of approximately $15.5 billion and segment profit of approximately $1.5 billion. All of this rolls up to an adjusted EPS forecast in the range of $6.40 to $6.60. That concludes our prepared remarks, so operator, we can open the line for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one in your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. Your first question comes from the line of Sheila. Please go ahead.

Morning guys. And Scott, congratulations on your career and building up Textron and handing the baton over to Lisa. Lisa, congratulations to you as well. Maybe if you could talk about your top priorities for the company now that you're a CEO.

Thanks, Sheila. Look, as I outline in the remarks, we are really starting from a very strong foundation. And so as I look at my priorities, I think about them in three parts. First off, execution. Each business has to deliver on their commitments with that operational rigor and cash discipline and have the accountability to do so. I have a phrase, it's we have to do what we say we're going to do. And so we're going to hold each business to that. You know, second will be a portfolio focus, how we allocate that cash return opportunities across our A&D assets. We have to be very clear about where we lean in and equally clear about where we don't. An example here of how we've been leaning in is on the MV75 long lead and factory investment to ensure success as the Army pulls that program forward. And lastly, we have to really keep building resilience. so that all of our businesses perform well across cycles. You could think about this as investing in our manufacturability, investing in our supply chain, and really investing in our talent. So that's what we have to do. I think the how we have to do it is with clarity. We have to very clearly define those execution goals, clearly define our allocation of our capital, and that strategic focus across our business. I think when we're having that rigor, it's going to result in us continuing to execute reliably while we make clear choices of what we invest in, what we protect, and frankly, what we don't pursue is equally as important.

Got it. Thank you for that. And maybe one for Dave. Dave, your guiding to aviation revenue is up 9%, but orders were down 3% over the last 12 months. Can you maybe just discuss how the buildup to aviation guidance and the cadence for aviation throughout 26?

Sure. So, you know, our overall guide is 6.5 billion. file of around 6%, just like we had in 2025. When you think about the margin cadence, I think you'll see a similar level of seasonality as we had in 2025. So we'll probably be about 100 to 150 basis points below the midpoint of the guide to start the year. And I'd expect by the end of the year, we'll be 100 to 150 basis points above the midpoint. And Q2 and Q3 will kind of be in between that.

Got it. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Arment from Baird. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks, Scott, Lisa, and Dave. Congrats, Lisa. And, Scott, thanks for all the support. I can't believe you want to leave all these quarterly conference calls. But anyway, Lisa, how should we be thinking about the MV-75 in the near and medium term, just given the Army's push to accelerate this program? And obviously you've been and you've probably seen a lot of different versions of what the plans have been. But how should we think about the current setup?

Thanks. Yeah, sure. So, I mean, I think the Army's been crystal clear about their desire to move faster. The mandate that came out from the Secretary and the Chief earlier in 2025 with the Army Transformation Initiative put this program as a centerpiece to what they want to execute for the warfighter in the really very near term. So as we mentioned in the prepared remarks, we had some exponential increase in the tangible output because of them kind of clearing the decks to allow the program team to work. We got the drawing releases out, tooling, we're building parts across the EMD aircraft. But equally as important, and you guys know this, sometimes just getting through the process is as cumbersome as building the product. And so the Army has kind of cleared the decks for the program team. And we've seen this at the program office in Huntsville. They have really accelerated the speed of acquisition. And so that has helped us get to a position where we can push these aircraft into testing sooner. And so at a high level, what that does is it pulls the entire program forward by about two and a half, three years. And so what we'll do is deliver these aircraft on the EMD through 2027, move right into, instead of having that gap, which the original program had, which, you know, we were going to kind of go into this testing phase and no production. So we would have two years of nothing. Well, that now has been filled in. So within months after aircraft number eight is delivered, you'll see aircraft number nine followed by 10, et cetera. And so that acceleration of production in and of itself gets capability out to the warfighter, gets the Army training with this tiltrotor aspect, and allows us to get the full rate production within about five to six years. So I think you're really seeing the Army lean in, and we're right there with them.

Great. That's great, Collin. I'll leave it at one. Thanks again.

Thank you. Your next question comes from a line of Christine LeWag from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Good morning, everyone. Congrats, Scott and Lisa. Lisa, you highlighted your focus on the portfolio and being deliberate about your investments. When you look at the portfolio today, do you intend to grow or prune? Where do you see incremental opportunities?

I really don't see that management as a binary choice. I think we have to have this ongoing process While I won't necessarily comment on specific assets right now, we do have to evaluate every single business against that same criteria. They have to have the returns, the cash generation, and the strategic fit for our long-term approach here. I certainly want to accelerate growth and scale in some high-quality aerospace and defense areas, but again, that's going to have to fit with the proper evaluation and strategic alliance to what we're doing in order to make sense. You know, we've had really historic success with aspects like ATAC that we talked about. It was a pretty small company when we acquired it. It was focused on some fleet exercises for the Navy, and now it's expanded into the Air Force Marines scope with the standoff jammer and adding, you know, over $450 million of backlog. So when we look at our assets, it doesn't necessarily have to be a big bang. It sometimes is these little assets that have really great long-term potential. So we'll look at that. I think we also, as I mentioned in the priorities, have to have some vertical integration efforts. We've seen a lot of success with that as we try to control our destiny when it comes to supply chain weakness, areas like actuators, interiors, key repair components that we have to have. And I think we need to really lean in and build on that to have that resilience that we need for the long term. And obviously, earlier in 25, we disposed of the power sports business. I think that was the exact right move. And so, you know, stated from the beginning, whether it's to grow or prune, we really have to have demonstrated performance by the business that we either are acquiring or continue to have that performance internal to our portfolio to make sure it's relevant to the future.

That's super helpful. And if I could add a second question. With your history at Textron Systems, I guess Textron Systems has historically been a disruptor in autonomous systems. And when you look at capabilities today, I mean, you have one of the broadest set of capabilities with unmanned ground, air, sea, command and control software. Now we're seeing more new players wanting to enter this autonomous space. I was wondering, can you give us the lay of the land of how to think about your offering, where you see your strengths are and how you think this market evolves and where Textron is differentiated versus these new players?

Sure. I mean, look, I think one of our key differentiators is that we have decades of experience here. We know how to manufacture with high rate affordably for our customer. We've seen, as I mentioned, millions of hours of this across various aspects. We've got aircraft on the backs of ships right now performing ISR capabilities. And so we know that in these austere environments, how to build products that are reliable for the warfighter And so I think because of that history and heritage, I'm pretty bullish on our opportunities there. And as you mentioned, we've done it not only on, I'll say, smaller unmanned drones in the air. It's actually harder to do it on land and in the sea because of the terrain environment. So we've demonstrated that capability as well. So I think as the government figures out the new way of warfighting, We need to be right there with our offerings and watching these entrants as they come in. And in some cases, there might be partnerships. In some cases, it'll be head-to-head competition. But I think Textron Systems has a strong offering to maintain as a key partner to the Army, Air Force, and Marines in this.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Miles Walton from Wolf Research. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning. Lisa, you just talked about investing in the supply chain, doing some verticalization. I guess the question I'd have on aviation, is that still, do you think you're limiting function to getting to higher production rates? And where are you in that recovery of supply chain control? And maybe how much cost extra is flowing through the numbers to facilitate your deliveries as you've otherwise planned by expediting supply?

Yeah, so productivity aviation is certainly a key focus for us as we go into 2026, and I think it's two parts, right? I mean, it is continuing recovery of the supply chain. I think in large part, and we saw this at Bell as well, the majority of it, I think we have gotten that recovery. It's still those key components that continue to be head-hurters, and so I think we're starting to see recovery. We're starting to see folks responding to the needs and the demands, but I mean, candidly, engines, just to call it a key component, which you have to have for these aircraft, has been a laggard for us. And we have to keep working with our partners there in order to get the engines to our aircraft. The other part, though, I think that we see is workforce. We've had a high attrition, I'll say, in the early workforce, folks that are, say, a year or two years into working with us. So the response of the team there, we created an in-house training program to upskill the talent there to create more longevity and resiliency of our workforce. And so those two pieces together is what we really have to have in order to improve the efficiency on the factory floor. And I would say that is broader than just aviation. It's also about we saw the same type of things that we need to work on and fix. Look, I would say it's both. I think the team has some good plans. And David, I don't know if you want to add any color there on whether or not we've priced that in, but I think there's a good progress and we'll hold them accountable to it.

Yeah, I'll just add, you know, if we look at 2025, you know, we certainly saw a modern improvement in the supply chain. We earned more hours in the factory. Did we get all the efficiency and productivity we hoped to get in the year? No. So there's still opportunity to drive better efficiency in the factory. So, you know, that can us as we go forward. And as you see from our guidance, we do expect to be able to deliver more airplanes in 2026 than we did in 2025. Okay.

Quick follow-up, Dave, on the CapEx for 26. Is that spike expected to continue beyond 26? So it's...

As we've talked about over the last, you know, six months as acceleration took hold, you know, essentially, you know, we're moving about two years to the left in terms of investment. So you'll probably see the elevated level in 2026 and 2027, all driven really by the MV75 program, simply moving investment that would have been in 2028 and 2029 to the left. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Stallard from Vertical Research. Your line is open.

Thanks so much. Good morning.

Morning. Morning.

And all the best, Scott, and congrats, Lisa. Welcome to the call. I wonder if I could ask a couple of questions about MV75. You've given us the additional capex cost or pulled forward capex cost that you're going to see in 26 and 27, and there's this potential charge when you get the LRIP contract sorted out later this year. But what's the flip side of this? I mean, how much could revenues go up by versus previous expectations as we look out to 27, 28, 29? And what could the returns be on those revenues versus what you might have expected before? Thank you.

So, you know, I'll talk on the, you know, as we've described this program, you know, ultimately the opportunity is between, you know, 40 and 60 units per year. And you can average that out. It's going to be a significant increase on the overall revenue profile of the business. And we expected that would start rolling in later this decade, much quicker than originally expected. The other point I'd make, you know, historically in the past, Bell was a double-digit margin business, and certainly as the program matures and we get into the initial lots of productions, our expectation would be that Bell would return to that. All these actions we're describing to you today means that's accelerated versus where it previously would have been, which, you know, it would have taken a lot longer time this decade.

Okay, and a quick follow-up, Dave. So if you take this charge later this year, Where would it leave booking margins on the MV75 going forward? Maybe like low single-digit and then eventually move up to those low double-digit levels?

Yeah, I mean, as you know, Rob, we're treating this as one program from a booking rate as new contract line items get awarded. If you look, for That resulted in us having to assume catch-up that lowered our booking rate, still in the low single digits margin percent. And in Q3 of 2025, we had an additional point awarded that actually resulted in us raising the booking rates. Again, still in that range. So this is still in the mid-low single digits as we go forward. And each time a new contract line item is awarded, we adjust it up or down. But this isn't, you know, the first time this has happened, and you can actually see that if you look at our EACs, you know, from, you know, Q4 of 24 or Q3 of 2025. But the program, we report and emphasize the program will continue to be profitable as we expect it to be profitable as we go forward.

That's great. Thanks very much. Your next question comes from the line of Seth Seifman from J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks very much, and congratulations to Scott and to Lisa. I wanted to ask, even with the CapEx that you're planning for this year, you know, still have some cash to deploy, no debt due this year. It seems from the release that the share count is down a bit. How do you think about using your cash here?

Yeah, look, I'll start, and Dave, if you want to pile on there, but we're going to continue to deploy that as appropriate. We're going to make sure that we do proper research and development where it makes sense across the business and get ready, as we said, for the MB75 acceleration, and we'll continue to share buybacks as it makes sense.

Our expectation is we'll continue to deploy the relatively similar percentage that we've had in the past in our from our free cash flow and we're really comfortable where we are currently on a debt level, our ratios, et cetera. You know, we're good in triple B rating and that's where we expect to continue to be.

Excellent. Excellent. Very good. And then Lisa, I've bugged Scott with this question a couple of times in the past, but just with the acceleration of the program, maybe I can ask you since you've been so close to it, how do you think about concurrency risk with moving straight into LRIP? And what gives you confidence that we won't see future charges?

Yeah, so we've been working on this program for 15 years. And so with the prototype and the over 200 hours of flight that we had on the demonstrator, the fact that we're seeing on the digital engineering yield that we have in these programs, I mentioned we've got parts that are already being built. We're having 100% first pass yield. What that means is the parts are coming out exactly as designed. And so the fact that we're seeing that kind of performance out of the program gives me the confidence that what we build is what we designed. And so when we put that through testing, we certainly will discover some things. But I mean, I think we have high confidence that we have wrung out a lot of the concerns that you might have seen in older generation type development programs.

That's very helpful.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Noah Popanek from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, everyone, and congrats, Scott and Lisa and Scott. Thanks for all the time you spent with us over the years. Thank you. I was hoping to talk more about the aviation margins. You know, we see the recast. taking 60 basis points out of the reported. I guess, Dave, I don't know if you could just sort of tell us what the incremental was kind of fully adjusted in 25 and in your 26 guidance. And I guess, you know, the 25 guide had been 12 to 13. If we take the 60 basis points out of that, you know, the guidance for 26 is flat to down, I guess. Are we just recasting the aviation margin, or are we also resetting the aviation margin expectation for some reason?

No, we're certainly just recasting. I mean, I think, you know, if you look about, you're correct, we guided last year at 12% to 13% and ended up slightly below that. I mean, I think that's largely around the volume story. While we did have higher volume year over year, we ended up with a little more you look at our incrementals this year, you know, depending on where you end up in the range, I mean, we're probably between, you know, 15 to 20 percent. We've often said that this business should have incrementals of 20 to 25 percent, and that view has not changed. You know, I think the key to just us getting there is continuing to have efficiency and productivity improvements in the factory that will drive higher volume. And of course, you know, we're where we've established the market over the last five years. Pricing remains solid, so the business should continue to convert at 20% to 25%. And also, I should mention, with a very strong aftermarket business. We grew 6% last year. We expect to grow 6% this year. So it's certainly not a restatement of what we expect the margins to be. We feel comfortable where we're at and plan to continue to grow the business as we go forward.

OK. And then, Dave, you've talked about holding Bell EBIT flat as you ramp MV75 and grow revenue, but work through the margin. With what you're telling us today on the LRIP and once you take the charge, is that still the view or do we think about that differently?

That's still the view.

Okay. So this year you're growing revenue and the guidance is for the margin to be flat, so that would grow EBIT. I guess, therefore, that implies the margin still goes down a little bit more before then eventually going back up?

I mean, we're going to be probably going to be in a relatively, you know, steady state over the next couple of years. And then, you know, with the acceleration, you'll start seeing more of the benefit of that. But I think this is a relatively steady state, which is consistent to the message we've been sharing.

Okay. All right. Thanks a lot.

Your next question comes from a line of John golden from city. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks for, um, thanks for taking my question. Um, Lisa, I wanted to just sort of brainstorm, you know, the, the world of a much bigger budget, you know, not necessarily 1.5 trillion, but, but obviously kind of those, those sound bites are, are out there. What I'm trying to think through is, you know, between bell and system. But by the math, you guys have a lot of defense exposure. But more specifically, where do you think the points of leverage would be to the upside in a world where the budget was much higher?

Yeah, look, I think what you see is what the Department of War is trying to prepare for. I mean, we have aspects of our business across all of that. particularly around the Sentinel program and what our team is doing at systems around hypersonics and the thermal protective materials. I think there's points of leverage there with their emphasis on the XM-30 and the Marine Corps' armed reconnaissance vehicle and where those programs are in terms of their development. I certainly think there's opportunity for growth and acceleration in those programs. And then, as we've stated multiple times already, with the MB-75 and their continued push quickly into full-rate production. And so that, along with the ship-to-shore program, will be steady. I mean, we're producing those. We're only about 15 through a program record of 73. And so there's just, I'll say, continued foundation and solid support for these programs across all of our defense portfolio.

Got it. That's very helpful. There was a bit of a discussion earlier about adding capabilities. In a world where the budget was higher, you know, is that part of, you know, a guiding light for adding capabilities, accelerating growth in what you call high-quality areas of A&D? I just want to connect the dots there.

Yeah, sure. So, I mean, particularly around the space side of things, I think the Department of War is also kind of leaning into that, and I would like to see us move into – areas of the space side of defense, either with assets that we have or, you know, as we look to the future. So I certainly think that that is a key growth area that we need to be focused on.

Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

Your next question comes from a line of Gavin Parsons from UBS. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good morning. Morning.

Morning.

Also, my congrats to Scott and Lisa. Does jet demand pretty strong overall, but it does seem like large cabin maybe is the strongest segment at the moment? Is there any opportunity there to add a larger aircraft to the Cessna family?

Yeah, look, I think, you know, this year we brought in three block point upgrades, and, you know, that wasn't necessarily the plan as we went into the year. I think that kind of all kind of jammed up towards the end of the year, which create a little bit of a bumpiness for us. I think our plan would be to try to do one of those at a time and do one clean sheet at a time. And right now, the focus on the Denali and getting that entered into service is the focus for the team.

And then if I could just dig into the industrial margins a little bit, light in 25 but expanding in 26.

Yeah, and I'll take that one. I mean, I think that, you know, obviously, I think Caltech's did a really good job last year, you know, despite where the market is. And they've continued to see improving their own profitability. You know, TSV still has some challenges, kind of where the end market is. You know, they've absorbed a certain level of tariffs recently. which has also been a headwind. But overall, you know, we do see, you know, golf continues to be a pretty steady business and along with their cost reduction activities that they've been continuing to do. Those are kind of the combination of the two that are driving the improvement. Thank you.

Your next question comes from a line of Ron Epstein from Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Good morning, and congratulations. Everybody, Scott, hard to believe. It's been a while. Thanks, Ron. So, yeah, so maybe a couple questions. Just a first one, and we haven't talked about much. On the MD-75, how are you all thinking about the logistics and support for the aircraft? Because once the aircraft is built, logistics and support can be pretty profitable. What's the model around that, and how are you thinking about that?

Yeah, sure. So, you know, if we model it after what we've done with most of our programs on the military aircraft side, there's typically kind of a performance-based logistics type approach that the military works with us on. I think the Army in this approach also has been very intentional on how they have gone with basically their purpose rights. They want to have some organic capability themselves, so we will work with them to help them stand up that capability. Obviously, service parts repair, a lot of that will be probably stationed near where a lot of the center of their aircraft are. They're likely going to be at Fort Campbell to begin with. So we'll be working with them to ramp that and how those spares packages would look as they lay the program out into the various aspects of the Army. They're different. than how we deal with the Marines. The Marines have kind of two centers of location. The Army supports their aircraft where the Army is, and so we will have to support them in a more disparate way.

Got it, got it, got it. And then maybe just, I'm going to pull something out of the garage, and you'll know what I mean in a minute. Something we should talk about a little bit and sort of fade it away was Scorpion. And the reason I bring that up, not that maybe there's an immediate demand for Scorpion, but You guys were ahead of the game doing something that was a lot of commercial on your own dime. And at the time, the DRD dropped the ball and didn't get them. And I think you all would agree with this. I think they should have. You probably think they should have, but they didn't. Things have changed. And given that you've got this awesome toolkit of a lot of commercial parts and you're doing a bunch of good military stuff and commercial stuff at Bell, a bunch of really good largely commercial, but some military at Textron Aviation. Is an environment come together for you guys to start doing something like a Scorpion or whatever, again, where it can be largely commercial with a military application at a cost point that's better? Is there receptivity for that? With Scorpion, just maybe a decade ahead of its time?

I think that's right. I do think it was just a little bit ahead of its time, but when you look at what we're hearing in the last eight months, it echoes exactly what we tried to do with Scorpion, which was take a commercial mentality, commercial practices off the shelf of parts and put together a low cost, affordable platform that is beneficial to the warfighter. And so I think because of that being a part of our DNA, I think that's something that we would lean into. We do that, frankly, now. with some of our aircraft at Hexron Aviation Defense and inside of Bell. We have militarized Bell commercial aircraft that go into certain special missions around the globe. But as we look to where the government currently is leading us with this, you know, I'll say their new arsenal of freedom is what they've titled that as, where we have aspects that we can lean into that we certainly will. I think that that's what they've asked of us, and I think we're well positioned to do that.

Got it. Got it. And then, sorry, just one last one quickly. Could there be a new life for Scorpion? I mean, you know, the role that you built it for is still out there, right? Just saying.

Yeah. I haven't heard of it yet, but you know, certainly if it comes out, you guys will be the first to hear about it. Cause we'll be, we'll be we'll be talking about it, but I think there's so, but look, I agree with the sentiment, right? It's that there is, There is opportunity here, and we are positioned as a company that knows how to respond to that.

Cool. All right. Thank you very much, and congratulations. Thank you.

And that concludes our question and answer session and also concludes today's conference call. An audio replay will be available approximately two hours following the conclusion of this call. To access the replay, please dial 1-800-770-2030 and enter conference ID 696. 9175 and press the pound key thank you for your participation you may now disconnect