This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk13: Good morning. Welcome everyone to the Vulcan Materials Company third quarter 2023 earnings call. My name is Angela and I will be your conference call coordinator today. Please be reminded that today's call is being recorded and will be available for replay later today at the company's website. All lines have been placed in a listen only mode. After the company's prepared remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Now I will turn the call over to your host, Mr. Mark Warren, Vice President of Investor Relations for Vulcan Materials. Mr. Warren, you may begin.
spk04: Thank you, Operator, and good morning, everyone. With me today are Tom Hill, Chairman and CEO, and Mary Andrews Carlisle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Today's call is accompanied by a press release and a supplemental presentation posted to our website, VulcanMaterials.com. Please be reminded that today's discussion may include forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks, along with other legal disclaimers, are described in detail in the company's earnings release and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures are defined and reconciled in our earnings release, our supplemental presentation, and other SEC filings. During the Q&A, we ask that you limit your participation to one question. This will allow us to accommodate as many as possible during the time we have available. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Tom.
spk10: Thank you, Mark, and thank all of you for joining our call this morning. In September, we officially surpassed our prior goal of $9 per ton cash gross profit on a 12-month basis. And that was before reaching the 230 million tons on the same store basis and despite macro challenges over the past four years that none of us likely anticipated back in the fall of 2019 when we initially set that target. This accomplishment perfectly demonstrates the durability of our Irish-led business. And I'm really proud of how our teams continue to execute at a high level. Compounding profitability through the solid execution of our Vulcan Web Selling and Vulcan Web Operating strategic disciplines is at the core of who we are across our coast-to-coast footprint. Today, our teams are intensely focused on our new target of $11 to $12 of cash gross profit per ton. Cash gross profit per ton growth is key to increasing our free cash flow and continue to create value for our shareholders. In the quarter, we generated $602 million of adjusted EBITDA, which is a 19% improvement over the prior year. Our aggregate asphalt and concrete product lines all posted another quarter of year-over-year growth margin improvement. In the aggregate segment, gross margin expanded by 200 basis points, and cash Gross profit per ton improved by 18% despite lower volumes. Shipments declined 2% in the quarter with variations across end uses and geographies. Residential weakness impacted the majority of our markets, while at the same time, many of our markets are seeing improving momentum in highway shipments. Private non-residential construction activity related to large industrial and manufacturing projects continue to drive healthy volume growth, particularly in Georgia and the Carolinas. Remember, footprint matters in the Irish business. Ours is unmatched in the southeast where private demand dynamics are currently strongest and across the country in states where IIJA investments will be the most significant. Pricing momentum continued across our footprint with all geographies achieving healthy year-over-year increases. Average selling prices improved 15% in the quarter and 3% sequentially, more than offsetting continued inflationary cost pressures. In asphalt, gross margin improved 660 basis points. Shipments increased 11% and across most geographies with particular strength in California. Average selling prices improved 2% and cash unit profitability improved over 50%, benefiting from lower liquid asphalt costs and solid manufacturing cost control. Concrete gross margin improved 120 basis points. cash unit profitability improved by over 30% despite lower volume that continued to be impacted by the slowdown in residential construction activity. Remember, prior year concrete segment earnings benefited from the contribution of the now divested New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania concrete operations. Through the first nine months of the year, we have executed well and successfully navigated evolving macro dynamics. Let me comment briefly on what we're currently seeing in each end use. Starting with residential, we're encouraged by the recent growth in single-family permits and starts in many geographies over the last three months. On the other hand, after providing some support for overall residential demand, multifamily starts have now began to pull back from historically high levels. Affordability and higher mortgage rates are likely to continue to have some impact on residential activity. But the underlying fundamentals remain firmly in place. Vulcan markets have low housing inventory levels and favorable demographics driving the need for additional housing. In private non-residential construction, trends differ across categories. As expected, warehouse activity, the largest non-res category, has softened. But manufacturing activity remains at high levels and is concentrated in the Balkan states. We have booked and are shipping on numerous large manufacturing projects where we offer customers a differentiated solution with our advanced footprint and logistics capabilities. On the public side, leading indicators remain supportive of continued growth in both highway and infrastructure. Trailing 12-month highway starts are up 18% and 2024 state budgets are at record levels. We continue to expect accelerating growth in public construction activity into next year and continued growth for the next several years. Our nimble sales and operating teams are well prepared to deliver value for our customers in any demand environment and to continue to improve unit profitability and drive value for our shareholders. Now, I'll turn the call over to Mary Andrews for some additional commentary on our third quarter performance and upgraded 2023 outlook. Mary Andrews?
spk12: Thanks, Tom, and good morning. Over the last 12 months, we have improved our adjusted EBITDA margin by 220 basis points, posted a 97% free cash flow conversion ratio before our strategic reserves purchases, returned $275 million to shareholders via dividends and repurchases, improved our return on invested capital by 180 basis points, and reduced our net debt to adjusted EBITDA leverage to 1.8 times. Our robust operational performance that Tom highlighted, coupled with our sound capital allocation and strong balance sheet, position us well for continued success on our strategic objectives of further enhancing our core and expanding our reach. As part of our ongoing portfolio optimization, we are currently working to finalize an agreement for the disposition of our Texas concrete assets. As a result, during the quarter, we classified these assets as held for sale and recorded a $28 million pre-tax charge to adjust the carrying value to fair value. During the first nine months, we have invested $411 million in maintenance and growth capital. We continue to expect to spend between $600 and $650 million on maintenance and growth capital and $200 million on strategic reserve purchases for the full year. Year-to-date, our SAG expenses have increased a modest 3% and improved by 30 basis points as a percentage of revenue. Year-over-year increases are due mostly to higher incentive accruals congruent with improved earnings. Our investments in talent and technology to support our business objectives are paying off in operational results. After another quarter of strong operational execution and financial results, we now expect to achieve between $1.95 and $2 billion of adjusted EBITDA for the full year 2023, a greater than 20% improvement versus the prior year at the midpoint. We plan on carrying this strong momentum into next year, So I'll now turn the call back over to Tom to provide some initial commentary on 2024 and a few closing remarks.
spk10: Thank you, Mary Andrews. While we're still finalizing our operating plans for 2024, let me offer some early commentary on our expectations. And I'll start with the two things I'm most confident in regarding 2024. First, aggregate pricing momentum. For the last seven quarters, aggregate prices have exceeded historical norms. And the pricing environment remains quite positive. Our vocal way of selling is driving our commercial execution. We expect prices to improve at least high single digit in 2024. Second, public demand. We are confident in growing public demand supported by the recent growth in contract award activity and healthy state DOT budgets for 2024. We expect public construction activity to accelerate next year. Now, there's more uncertainty regarding the impact of the microeconomic environment on private demand that makes it, frankly, a little bit too early to call. While current trends in single family residential activity are positive, uncertainty remains as to how higher rates and affordability challenges may impact that sector overall and influence whether or not it returns to growth next year. In private non-residential demand, similar uncertainties exist as to how a higher rate environment could impact the sector overall. Additionally, if warehouse activity continues to pull back from the recent historical high levels, it may further mask the current strength in manufacturing activity and will be a key driver of the degree of decline in non-residential demand. We'll give you an update in February as to how we see these dynamics unfolding and what that means for aggregate shipments in 2024. I am confident that our teams are well equipped to deliver unit profitability growth in any macro environment, and they have a proven track record of doing so. Over the last 12 months, even in the face of a volatile macro backdrop and lower aggregate shipments, our average cash gross profit per ton has expanded by 18%, and our adjusted EBITDA has improved 17%. As we work to finish this year strong and finalize our plans for 2024 over the next couple of months, we'll remain focused on keeping our people safe, stay committed to our Vulcan way of selling and Vulcan way of operating disciplines, and continue to deliver value for our shareholders. And now Mary Andrews and I will be happy to take your questions.
spk13: At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. You may remove yourself from the queue at any time by pressing star 2. We do ask that you limit yourself to one question. Once again, that is star 1 to ask a question. We will pause for a moment to allow questions to queue. The first question comes from Trey Grooms with Stevens. Please go ahead.
spk14: Hey, good morning, everyone. So, Tom, I wanted to kind of follow up on the last bit of your commentary here. And I appreciate, you know, some of your high-level comments around demand and the end markets. But, you know, could you maybe give us enough color where we could try to triangulate maybe the possibilities if it is possible to call at this point of you know if volume could be in positive territory next year's you kind of look at those three or four in markets and and understanding there's a lot of uncertainty here but any additional color you give us around that would be helpful yeah great good morning probably a little early to call specifics I'd say that footprints gonna matter and I like ours because of a position the southeast
spk10: It wouldn't surprise me if we saw a modest decline next year, similar to what we've seen this year. But we get there a different way. Some challenges on the private side. Single family, we think, has hit bottom and is improving. And I think we can get to growth when looking at the full year for 2024. Multifamily, as you know, will be a headwind. So... In non-res, I think we've got some – it's a mixed bag. We've got some challenges on the light side and on warehouses. Warehouses starts have gotten a little weaker. The headwinds in light warehouses will be partially offset, I think, by the big industrial projects, which really fit us. Now, we'll see – you'll definitely see growth on the private side, both in highways and non-highway infrastructure driven by, you know, state, local – and the big IJ funding. All that said, to your point, I think I could make a scenario to get flat volume next year, but at this point, I'd probably lead us to a modest decline. But all that being said, remember that summer of this year, we should still realize really strong earnings growth next year, even if we do have a modest decline in volume. Got it.
spk14: Okay, thanks for those thoughts, Tom. I appreciate it. I'll pass it on. You bet.
spk13: The next question comes from Tyler Brown with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
spk05: Good morning, Tyler. Hey, good morning. Hey, good morning. Hey, I know there's obviously going to be a lot of chatter about volumes, but I kind of want to come back to this idea about unit revenues versus unit costs because it feels like costs are just remaining stubbornly sticky. Volumes are stubbornly opaque. So despite both of those, though, you guys have expanded unit margins. So can you just talk about your confidence in the durability of expanding those margins into next year, kind of regardless of what the market throws at you? And, Mary Andrews, just any thoughts on what unit cost inflation ex-fuel could be? Thanks.
spk10: Yeah, let me take – I think I'll take price first. And you're right, we'll expand margins, and I think we'll see another year of really strong unit margin growth, even in the face of inflation. And it's really because we carry really good pricing momentum into 2024. You know, that visibility into healthy public demand growth, and you couple that with rising energy prices, really sets up a good environment for price. Our conversations with our customers for January price increases I think have gone very well. If you look at our backlog prices, I think they're very healthy. And as we look at 2024 prices, I'd expect at least – high single-digit, but I could also see a path to low double-digit pricing. So, you know, at this point, we carry really good, we carry excellent pricing momentum into 2024, and we'll more than offset inflation and see strong unit margin growth.
spk12: Yeah, Tyler, and in terms of cost and evaluating next year, I think it's probably helpful to think about our recent trends, you know, on a trailing 12-month basis. You'll remember on a year-over-year basis, trailing 12-month total cash cost of sales began rising in the first quarter last year. And, you know, we saw it ramp considerably, that delta, for five quarters before peaking in the first quarter this year. You know, it's since moderated for the last two quarters, modestly, and we expect that trend to continue. We just think it's going to be gradual. So as we think into next year, I think what that means is, you know, higher than historical average cost increases in 2024, you know, possibly even high single digits, but as you've started with the pricing momentum that Tom described, we can still deliver attractive gross margin improvement and definitely unit profitability improvement next year.
spk05: Okay. Excellent. Thank you. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Garrett Schmoy with Loop Capital. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hi, Garrett. Hey, good morning. Thanks for having me. I'm wondering if you can expand on just that last comment, Tom, with respect to seeing the path to low double-digit pricing next year, you know, recognizing you don't have a formal guidance just yet, and you do expect pricing to be on at least high single digits. Is that based on the conversations that you guys are having now with your customers and perhaps better than expected discussions? Does it require carryover from any mid-year increases you got this year? Does it require any additional mid-year pricing next year? Just any additional color on how we get to low double digits in 2024. Yeah.
spk10: On price, first of all, I would say that it's high single-digit, low double-digit. The January price increases conversation has gone very well. And as you pointed out, I think as we've seen for the last few years, we'll have mid-year price increase discussions with our customers. It's just part of the norm now. Well, I guess we'll check back in in February with a little more color on that and have a lot clearer view of it. But again, I think as we look forward, it looks pretty good from a price perspective. On cost, as Mary Andrews said, the place is just stubborn for us. And, you know, where we've looked past had low single-digit each year, you know, this year up until 2022. This year we're at low double-digit, but as Mary Andrews says, starting to fall off. But I think it's slower than maybe I would have expected six months ago. Got it. Okay.
spk06: Thank you, Nick.
spk13: The next question comes from Anthony Pettinari from Citigroup. Please go ahead.
spk07: Hey, Anthony. Hey, good morning. Tom, on private non-residential, you talked about some of these large manufacturing projects in the southeast helping to offset weakness in some of the wider categories. And I'm just wondering, as you look over the past few months and as we think about 2024, Have you seen any kind of incremental slowdown or delays in some of these megaprojects, or are they coming kind of on time or maybe faster than expected? I guess we've seen some news stories about maybe availability of skilled labor and contractors in some cases impacting individual projects, but I don't know if that was something that was widespread or something that you're seeing with your customer set.
spk10: Actually, I think just the opposite. We've seen them come on strong. 11 of those very large projects and, you know, starting to ship those, it'll be more of a 2024 play. Those 11 that I'm thinking of make up about 12 million tons. As we look out, I think we're probably over the next year, we'll bid another six, seven, eight of these big projects that would constitute another 14 million tons. So the large industrials are going to move the needle for us in 2024. Geography really, really helps here. There's Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, where a lot of those are right in our footprint. So our geography has really helped us here. But from our perspective, they've gone probably a little faster than maybe we've anticipated. But remember, we're first coming out of the ground, so supply chain probably impacts us less than maybe others does. Okay, that's very helpful. I'll turn it over to you. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Stanley Elliott with Stiefel. Please go ahead.
spk15: Hi, Stanley. Hey, good morning, everybody. Thank you for the question. Hey, Tom, could you all talk a little bit more about kind of what you're seeing at the state budget level? You know, it seems to be kind of a different part of the story maybe, you know, from prior years and just how that can help the public markets, you know, accelerate into next year.
spk10: Yeah, good question. And actually, it's going well. As you know, we always say it takes two years for the money to go to work. And if you remember, IJA was passed November of 21, so we're at the two-year mark, and we're starting to see it come on. It'll be a gradual growth rate over time. We will see growth in 2024. We see it in the awards, trailing 12 months. It's up 70%. But if you look at the, to your point, if you look at the state DOT capital budgets for 2024, they're actually really big. You probably won't see all of that in 24, but it'll sure sets us up well. For example, I think Alabama's up 29% capital budget. California's up five, but 50% over three years in California. So we're starting to see that money flow through. Florida will be up 20%. Tennessee's budget doubles. And Texas is up 21%. So this will be a multi-year play. They can't put all that money to work in 2024, but it sure sets us up. Some of it will go to work in 2024, but it sets us up also for 2024 and 2025. I think that, again, all this is really setting us up well for 2024, 2025, and 2026. Perfect. Thanks so much. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Catherine Thompson with Thompson Research Group. Please go ahead.
spk10: Good morning, Catherine.
spk11: Good morning. Thanks for taking my question today. I know there's a lot of questions just about the rest of 23 and the outlook for 2024, but stepping back and looking at the big picture, there's been a bit of activity in the industry from an M&A standpoint, and some rumblings of a greater slowdown in the economy in 2024, which can be opportunities for growth for companies as well as positions yourself. As you think about these type of opportunities and just areas of growth for Vulcan, how do you position yourself and what geographies and or products are top of the list in terms of growth initiatives for Vulcan? Thank you.
spk10: Yeah, well, aggregate is always going to be the top of the list. And, you know, bolt-ons in our footprint will give us the best returns. As I look at the M&A market right now from, you know, say six or eight months ago, it's actually picked up. I think over the next several months, over the next several quarters, we should see some strategic bolt-on acquisitions. and I think that we've got some really good opportunities there. I think we'll also, over the next two years, see a marked pickup in greenfield starts as we've got some really good opportunities in adjacent markets to add some new facilities that we've been working on for the last five to ten years. So I think both will pick up. As always, our biggest growth engine is going to be improving cash growth, property, and aggregates. And I think as we've heard earlier in this conversation, while we've had a great year in 23, I think we'll also have a really strong year because of pricing momentum and our operating disciplines as we look out to 2024. So I'm very encouraged with growth on all fronts at this point.
spk13: Great. Thank you.
spk10: Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Jerry Rivich with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Good morning.
spk17: Hey, Tom. Mary Andrews. Good morning. I'm wondering if we could just talk about the opportunity that you folks have from the logistics services and other initiatives outside of price cost. You've had over the past 10 years, you know, 10% compounded CAGR and profitability. You've had some contribution outside of price cost from those initiatives. And can we just ask you for an update on how that's tracking and the opportunities over the next couple of years?
spk10: Yeah, it's quietly gone very well for us, and it's been, I think, a strategic advantage to service our customers, particularly on these very large projects. They're complex. Quality and delivery makes a big difference because those projects have a time frame, and some of them have damages if you're not on time, and if you can't get it there and get the right product there to hold the project up, it's worth more than the price of aggregate. So I think that both from a price perspective and a volume perspective, quietly it has been a strategic advantage for us.
spk17: And the outlook from here, Tom, any particular acceleration? Because it seems like it's contributed to the unit profitability, Kager, you know, about want the two points generally.
spk10: Yeah, I think that it will continue to grow. I think we continue to add new features to that, including back office features that make it easier for our customers to do business with us. So I think, again, we're not done with it, and we continue to learn and improve upon it. Thanks. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Mike Dahl with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk08: Morning, Mike. Morning. Morning. Thanks for taking my question. We'll talk about the downstream businesses, maybe give us an update on how you're thinking about them for this year within the guide, and then if you do have any initial thoughts on kind of the volume and price or price-cost outlook and more to how you outline for your downstream businesses next year, that would be great.
spk10: Yeah, so asphalt, you know, it's been a great year. It was a really strong quarter. Volumes were up 11%. Margin was up 50%. And we really helped. First of all, we're in really good asphalt markets, but we're also obviously helped by liquid, you know, falling liquid. And on top of that, really good pricing momentum for hot mix. As we look to 2024, I'd say we're still doing the work. I think there's potentially some challenges from liquid pricing going up. I think demand will be okay, but I think we'll give you a lot more color in February. As I looked at ReadyMix, as we called out kind of early in the year, where we struggled with unit margins because of inflation and energy last year, we got past that with price as we predicted. Volumes in the quarter were a little challenged on a same-store basis. um and that's really driven by single family construction the prices were up 10 percent and your margins were up over 30 percent next year i think it's a little early call because of the volatility in the private side we just got to see more that said i think we do have um pretty good pricing momentum going into 24 on concrete and i think just longer term
spk12: You know, we think about that ready mix business as, you know, kind of low double-digit gross margin. And I think as we, you know, move ahead, we'll continue improving back towards that. On asphalt, you know, same thing probably through the cycle, high single digits, maybe, you know, low double digits. You know, we're ahead of that right now because of timing on energy. But, you know, the margin recovery in both businesses is exciting, and we'd expect that to continue.
spk08: Great. Thank you. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Timna Tanners with Wolf Research. Please go ahead. Morning, Timna.
spk01: Morning, guys. Thanks for all the great detail. I guess I know I figured I'd touch on the Mexican quarry updates because there was some news recently that the government offered you something north of 300 million and that was not accepted. So just wondering what the latest there is, what you're holding out for. I know you've quoted some press reports of closer to over a billion, but just trying to get a sense of maybe any timing there or the latest in that process. Thanks.
spk10: Yeah, as far as you got to remember, as far as a number is concerned, we have a confidentiality agreement with the NAFTA tribunal, so we can't quote numbers. There's been some quoted in the Mexican press. As far as the business value of that business is concerned, the simple story is that we're waiting for the results of the NAFTA claim. The NAFTA tribunal heard the case in August. We like our position. We like how that hearing went. We should get those results sometime next year. And as far as the property rights in our property down there, we'll protect our ownership. We'll simply protect the ownership of our land in Mexico.
spk01: So them offering you something before the results of the NAFTA panel was just what to try to get around that ultimate result maybe? That seems strange.
spk10: I can't – I don't want to predict the dealings of the Mexican government. I can't explain that to you.
spk01: Understood. All right. Thanks again.
spk10: Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Phil Ng with Jefferies. Please go ahead.
spk00: Hi, Phil. Hey, guys. You guys call out some cross-currents in your non-res business, notably between manufacturing and warehouse. Can you help size up these two end markets for you from a percentage of your business or tons? And any nuances between the aggregate intensity of these two different end markets?
spk10: Yeah, well, I would tell you, first of all, both of them are really aggregate intensive because they're big and they're flat. But let me just kind of see if I can size up the non-res sector for you. I think... First of all, non-residential demand has been much better in 23 than we originally anticipated back in February, really supported by warehouses and the large manufacturing projects. As we look to 24, I think non-residential construction demand will have some segments up and some segments down. The larger manufacturing projects, which you pointed out, are really good for aggregates and particularly good for Vulcan. As I pointed out, so many of those are right in our footprint, and we've already backlogged almost a dozen of them. So we'll service a little bit of that this year, but most of it will go into 24. Warehousing demand held up really good in 23. It's at record levels. But we see some risk as starts are now slowing as we had anticipated. We thought we'd get hit with some of that at 23, but so far so good. But I think, you know, we're probably anticipating some of that for 24. We'll continue to see some challenges to light because of macroeconomics. But, you know, even with some challenges to non-res, I think our markets outperform because of the big, large industrials and how many of them we backlog.
spk12: Yeah, and Phil, in terms of, you know, composition of shipments, we don't necessarily track shipments to that level, but I think you could think about it in terms of contract awards. And so in private non-res, you know, warehouses now make up probably close to 50% of the contract awards and the industrial manufacturing probably 10 to 15%. Okay.
spk00: And then you guys gave us some good color for 2024 in terms of the big drivers, low single-digit volume, the quantities potentially in ags, double-digit price, and potentially high single-digit cost inflation. Mary Andrews, I guess if I had to unpack that, I get to low teen cash growth, gross profit per ton growth next year. Am I generally in the strike zone?
spk12: Well, I think, you know, it's too early for us to go there, really. We'll, you know, come back in February with more specifics. But as we've talked about, you know, we definitely see good opportunities for continued unit profitability growth next year.
spk10: Yeah, I think, you know, I think overall your assumptions aren't, you know, again, some of that could fluctuate by the time we get to February. But at this point, I don't think your assumptions are way off. Thanks, Tom. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Keith Hughes with Truist. Please go ahead.
spk18: Yeah, a question on diesel. What role is that playing in the guidance for the fourth quarter and current prices? What would that look like to start next year?
spk12: Yeah, so in the third quarter, diesel was really up and down, but was a net benefit. Thinking, you know, as we move forward, if diesel stays at the levels we saw in September, fourth quarter would probably be essentially a push. Looking into next year, we think on average, you know, diesel will be higher year over year, but it's, you know, probably too early to call exactly what that will look like. As you know, for us, Diesel can be a temporary challenge, but it's also an opportunity.
spk18: And while we're on cost, one other question. I know a lot of your other inputs, components, and kind of the world has continued to stay high. Are you hearing from your suppliers more potential increases to begin calendar 24th?
spk10: Yeah, I think, you know, everything is sequentially staying up. We're in those negotiations. I think a little early to call that right now for the big movers. The one we think will be up will be energy, both diesel and electricity will probably be up. But as far as the other inputs, I think that, you know, it's stayed a lot more stubborn than we would have anticipated. I don't think we're – At this point, we'd call up, you know, probably high single for next year, but it's really too early to call as we're doing the operating plans and the negotiations with our suppliers at this point.
spk18: Okay, thank you.
spk10: Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Michael Dudas with Vertical Research. Please go ahead.
spk09: Good morning, Mary Andrews, Mark, and Tom. For Tom and Mary Andrews, When you talked about you allocated capital towards the land acquisitions here this quarter, up to $200 million, you talk about 2023. Maybe can you share how that progress is and what's the medium, longer-term timing on some of the greenfield opportunities? Are there some that are closer rather than others? And, you know, on a big picture basis, how much is that kind of think about relative to investing the capital into those types of projects?
spk12: Yeah, so this year, those strategic reserve purchases, as you would have seen, we completed the majority of that in the third quarter. And we're working on our capital planning for next year right now. And Tom mentioned earlier, we do have a healthy pipeline of greenfield opportunities at varying stages. So we're working now to define what that spending will look like for 2024. I think if you think of CapEx, You know, overall, if we go into next year, we think that the current levels for, you know, operating and maintenance CapEx are appropriate for our current business needs and kind of where we are in the cycle. The growth is the part that will move around a little bit more, but we wouldn't expect the same, you know, level of land purchases next year as this year.
spk09: Okay, and you would add – so there's capacity, growth potential in those states or others as you're looking out medium to longer term as those markets continue to be attractive for you guys?
spk10: Yeah, I think the answer to that is yes. It's also what you're looking at is where are the growth quarters and how do you get the most effective logistic position to those future growth quarters and what's the timing of – putting the capital in. And that's the beauty of a greenfield is you can time the capital and you don't have to go in all at once. So, you know, if you've got a faster growing market where your greenfield is, you'd put a big plan in. If it's out there and you just want a slow growth, you'd put maybe a portable or smaller plan in. But I think that in a number of these, it is getting the most strategic position in those markets at the right time. Thank you, Mary Andrews, Tom.
spk13: The next question comes from David McGregor with Longbow Research. Please go ahead.
spk02: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for the question. Good morning, Tom. Good morning, Mary Andrews. I guess my question is just on the timing on project starts. And, you know, I guess are you seeing much in terms of change in the lag between awards announcements and aggregate shipments? I mean, is that lag greater than you would have otherwise expected at this point? And we've had quite a bit of inflation, obviously, in materials and labor and services. I'm guessing a number of these projects are running above engineers' estimates. Any projects being held back or delayed as a consequence of inflationary concerns and expectations that if they were to defer, they might get better economics further down the road?
spk10: As far as delay, as far as people probably just getting pushed back, we saw a little bit of that in a couple of states. I'd say nine months ago. We're not seeing that today at all. In fact, states are working hard to get projects out. Inflation has definitely had an impact on project costs, but we're still seeing growth in demand this year, and we'll see growth in demand next year despite inflation. And as you heard me talk about earlier, budgets are up in a number of states, what I'd say dramatically. So I think they understand that. I don't I worry about projects being pushed back from a cost perspective. If it is delays to projects, it's really delays to getting into lettings because of capacity of DOTs growing into the funding. But, again, I think all that taken in, we continue to see gradual growth in highway demand next year and the next year and the next year and the next year. Is he much in the way of revisions to engineers' estimates? I'm sorry, I misunderstood you.
spk02: Are you seeing much in the way of revisions to engineers' estimates?
spk10: Yeah, they're going up, and I think they're adjusting to it appropriately. But there's a lag there, and, you know, they're playing a little bit of catch-up because of inflation. Thank you, Tom. Thank you.
spk13: The next question comes from Michael Finneger with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk06: Good morning. Good morning. Morning. Thanks for taking my questions. You gave some great color on 2024. Just to kind of put a finer point on it, when you think of the price versus cost spread you guys achieved in Q3, is that price versus cost spread expanding in 2024 or staying the same given kind of the moving pieces you are you were indicating earlier?
spk10: I think the simple answer is, and you have to like it, it was a little early to call. We're still figuring that out. We're trying to give you color very early on price and cost. And I think, you know, on price, we said, you know, high single digit, maybe in the low double digit on cost. really early on cost because, you know, we're estimating high single-digit, but we're doing the work right now, including negotiating with our vendors and doing the operating plans. I think what I am encouraged about on the cost perspective is I think we'll see improved operating efficiencies because of the automation and what we've done in the plants, but also the complete program of the Vulcan way of operating. But to call that margin growth at this point, I think we're just a little bit early. We'll be back to you in February.
spk06: Appreciate that. And when we think of next year, how you kind of outlined potential movement in shipments, when we think of the cadence, residential, public, light versus heavy, I'm just curious if you kind of help us understand how you think the cadence kind of plays out for next year. Do you start strong or does it actually kind of get better through the year? You know, you have kind of easier comps potentially in the second half. Just how we kind of think of these moving pieces, how that rolls through next year.
spk10: I don't know that I have got that down yet. I think the puts and takes for next year go like this, and I'm not answering your question as far as sequencing the quarterly, but more what would be on the high side and what would drive us lower, and I think number one, speed of, and really important, speed of highway dollars going to work and going to shipments will be at the forefront. Second would be does single-family come roaring back, or is it maybe a little slower? I think we'll see growth in single-family. It's how fast and how far. And the macroeconomics, the macro, the demand, the fundamentals for demand in single-family is there, but you're fighting, obviously, cost and inflationary pressures and the price of a house. On non-res, it will be the speed of the big projects versus what happens with warehouses. So I think those are kind of the puts and takes. I'm not sure that as far as the sequencing quarter to quarter, I think we've got to do some work on that. But those will be the puts and takes of if we have the high end, the low end, we get the guidance in February. Perfect. Thank you. Sure.
spk13: The next question comes from Rohit Seth with Seaport Research Partners. Please go ahead.
spk16: Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Good morning. My question is on the Vulcan way of operating. You guys had mentioned on past calls that you had made some investments over the past couple of years. I know you touched on the logistics side, but I think there's some plant-level stuff that – we had in the works and we're looking forward to potentially being needle movers in 2024. Do you still think those are going to be needle movers next year? And if you can help us think about what to expect and if you can quantify any impacts, that would be great.
spk10: Yeah, it's really hard to quantify, particularly at this point, as those operating plans are being developed and will be presented to us in December. From a high level, the investment we did and, you know, the top probably 70% of our operating facilities are tons from a volume perspective. That investment's in place. Now, once you get it in place, you've got to get the technical piece for each plant has to come out. We're working on that as we speak. I think we'll be through that. by the time we get to the first, second quarter of next year, or at least mid-year next year. So we'll see some marked improvements, I believe, in operating efficiencies, putting that to dollars and cents. That work's going on right now, and we won't be done with it until December, so we'll have to get back with you in February.
spk16: All right. Thank you. Thank you.
spk10: Thank you.
spk13: It appears we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back over to our presenters for any additional remarks.
spk10: Thank you very much for your interest in Vulcan materials. We look forward to talking to you throughout the quarter. Please keep yourselves and your families safe and healthy. Thank you.
spk13: This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.
Disclaimer