This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk03: Good morning and welcome to the Wabtec first quarter 2024 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero on your telephone keypad. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Kyra Yates, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
spk00: Thank you, Operator. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Wabtec's first quarter 2024 earnings call. With us today are President and CEO Rafael Santana, CFO John Olin, and Senior Vice President of Finance John Mastelers. Today's slide presentation, along with our earnings release and financial disclosures, were posted to our website earlier today and can be accessed on the Investor Relations tab on webtechcorp.com. Some statements we are making are forward-looking and based on our best view of the world and our business today. For more detailed risks, uncertainties, and assumptions relating to our forward-looking statements, please see the disclosures in our earnings release and presentations. We will also discuss non-GAAP financial metrics and encourage you to read our disclosures and reconciliation tables carefully as you consider these metrics. I will now turn the call over to Rafael.
spk04: Thanks, Kyra, and good morning, everyone. Let's move to slide four. I'll start with an update on our business, my perspectives on the quarter, and progress against our long-term value creation framework, and then John will cover the financials. Last quarter, when we met, we talked about the strong momentum that we had when we exited 2023. Well, that momentum continues. Sales were $2.5 billion, which was up 13.8% versus prior year. Revenue growth was driven by strong performance, largely from the trade segment. And adjusted EPS was up 47.7% from the year-ago quarter, driven by increased sales and margin expansion. Total cash flow from operations for the quarter was $334 million. The 12-month backlog was $7.7 billion, up 11%, signifying continued momentum and visibility across the business. In total, multi-year backlog was $22 billion. Overall, we had a strong start to the year, the underlying strength and momentum across the business is evident. We remain confident in our ability to execute, to deliver for our customers, and to continue to make progress against our long-term growth strategies. Shifting our focus to slide five, let's talk about 2024 and market expectations in more details. While key metrics across our freight business remain mixed, we are encouraged by the strength of our business, the strength of our international markets, and our robust pipeline of opportunities across geographies. North America car loads were up 1.8% in the quarter. Despite this car load growth, the industry's active locomotive fleet was down when compared to last year's first quarter, while WAPTAC's active fleet was higher. As we look forward, we continue to see significant opportunities across the globe in demand for new locomotives, modernizations, and digital technologies as our customers invest in solutions that continue to drive reliability, productivity, safety, and fuel efficiency. Looking at the North American rail car builds, last quarter we discussed the industry outlook for 2024 to be about 38,000 cars to be delivered. which has now been lowered by the industry sources to reflect an expected 36,000 cars. Internationally, activity is strong across most of our core markets. Significant investments to expand and upgrade infrastructure are supporting a robust international orders pipeline. In mining, commodity prices and an aging fleet are supporting activity to refresh and upgrade the truck fleet. Finally, moving to the transit sector, the megatrends of urbanization and decarbonization remain in place, driving the need for clean, safe, and efficient transportation solutions around the globe. Next, let's turn to slide six to discuss a few business highlights. Late in Q1, we signed a $270 million strategic order for new locomotives with a large mining customer in Africa. This, coupled with a recent service order in the region for $64 million, highlights the significant opportunity that we believe exists in Africa. Within mining, we're seeing continued strength in the business, in particular aftermarket, and the team has signed orders totaling over $250 million in the quarter. In Indonesia, We won a long-term parts agreement with PTK. And finally, our Maintenance Away team launched its Shuttle-Aggle Commander NXT, the next generation of railcar movers. The new model was specifically designed for the needs of the customers to optimize tractive effort, reduce wheel slipping, and extend tire life. All of this demonstrates the continued momentum across the business the team's relentless focus on execution, the strong pipeline of opportunities we continue to deliver on. WAPTEC is well positioned to capture profitable growth with innovative and scalable technologies that address our customers' most pressing needs. Moving to slide seven, before turning it over to John, I want to briefly discuss our progress that we're making against one of our company's key strategies, which is to lead the decarbonization of rail. Our highly capable team, our installed base of locomotives, and our advanced locomotive technologies puts Wattek in a unique position to lead the industry on fuel efficiency and to reduce carbon emissions. With this in mind, we're driving progress on two fronts. First, is to enable our customers to transition to a near-zero emissions using their current installed base of locomotives. Our focus here leverages our customers' existing fleets and wayside infrastructure. Our customers can improve fuel efficiency and carbon emission by up to 18% through replacing the older fleets with our Tier IV and modernized locomotives, along with realizing improved durability eligibility, reliability, and fuel efficiency. We're also enabling our existing locomotive portfolio to be capable of reductions of up to 60% in carbon through the use of bio and renewable fuels. And when further mixed with hydrogen in the locomotive's internal combustion engine, up to 80% total carbon reduction. In addition, we believe we have a competitive advantage given the fact that our locomotives are more fuel efficient. And our four-stroke engine architecture facilitates the use of hydrogen in our internal combustion engines. And the best part of this approach is that it provides significant optionality for our customers. And this approach is completely reversible back to diesel if supplies of alternative fuels are not available or not economical. On our second path to decarbonization, we're developing zero emissions technology and equipment. As you are aware, we recently introduced the world's first heavy haul battery electric locomotive to a mining customer in Australia. Given the customer's application, they plan to operate this locomotive relying on regenerative braking to charge the batteries. And later this month, we will ship our first battery hybrid locomotive. Finally, we are investing and partnering with government agencies to develop heavy haul locomotives powered by hydrogen fuel cells. We believe that the commercialization of hydrogen fuel cells for heavy haul locomotives is farther down the road. Consequently, we are facing our investments with our customers' readiness to adopt the technology. With that, I'll turn the call over to John to review the quarter, segment results, and our overall financial performance. John?
spk02: Thanks, Rafael, and hello, everyone. Turning to slide eight, I will review our first quarter results in more detail. In the first quarter, we continued to see the underlying momentum that we experienced as we exited last year. As expected, both revenue growth and operating margin growth were overshared in Q1 versus our expectations for full-year growth. As we discussed in the last quarter call, we expected both revenue and margin growth to be higher in the first half versus the second half. While we continue to expect growth in the second half, we expect it to be at a much more tempered pace than the first half. Sales for the first quarter were $2.5 billion, which reflects a 13.8% increase versus the prior year. Sales growth in the quarter was driven by the freight segment, especially in our equipment and services groups. For the quarter, GAAP operating income was $412 million, driven by higher sales, improved gross margin, and focused cost management. Adjusted operating margin in Q1 was 19.8%, up 3.4 percentage points versus the prior year. This increase was driven by improved gross margin of 2.4 percentage points, and driven by operating expenses, which grew at a slower rate than revenue, increasing our Q1 margin by an additional 1.0 percentage points. GAAP earnings per diluted share were $1.53, which was up 64.5% versus the first quarter a year ago. During the quarter, we had pre-tax charges of $10 million for restructuring, which were primarily related to our integration 2.0 and our portfolio optimization initiative to further integrate and streamline Webtek's operations. As you may recall, integration 2.0 is expected to drive $75 to $90 million of run rate savings by 2025. And our portfolio optimization initiative will eliminate roughly $110 million of low margin non-strategic revenue while reducing manufacturing complexity. In the quarter, adjusted earnings per diluted share was $1.89, up 47.7% versus prior year. Overall, Webtek delivered another solid quarter, demonstrating the underlying strength of the business. Turning to slide nine, let's review our product lines in more detail. First quarter consolidated sales were up 13.8%. Equipment sales were up 30.2% from last year's first quarter, driven by robust sales of mining equipment and higher deliveries of new locomotives. Component sales were up 13.6% versus last year driven by increased sales of industrial products, higher international sales, and the acquisition of L&M in late Q2 of 2023, partially offset by lower North American railcar build. Digital intelligence sales were down 5.9% from last year, where we continue to experience lower revenues in our North American market, but we do see growth in our next generation onboard locomotive products and digital mining. Our services sales grew 17.3%. Services growth was driven by significantly higher year-over-year deliveries of mods, increased overhauls, and parts sales. Our customers continue to recognize the superior performance, reliability, and availability of our fleet. Across our transit segment, sales increased 5.5% behind growth in our products and services businesses. The momentum in the transit segment remains positive as secular drivers such as urbanization and decarbonization accelerate the need for investments in sustainable infrastructure. Now moving to slide 10. Both GAAP and adjusted gross margin were up 2.4 percentage points during the quarter. In addition to higher sales, gross margin benefited from improved pricing and favorable mix between segments. Mixed within the freight segment was also favorable despite significantly higher new loco and mod deliveries in the quarter. During the quarter, we also benefited from favorable fixed cost absorption and benefits from Integration 2.0, as well as comparing against higher next-generation digital development costs in the first quarter of 2023. Our team continues to execute well to mitigate the impact of continued cost pressures by driving operational productivity and lean initiatives. Turning to slide 11, for the first quarter, GAAP operating margin was 16.5%, which was up 3.9 percentage points versus last year. Adjusted operating margin improved 3.4 percentage points to 19.8%. GAAP and adjusted SG&A expenses were down as a percentage of revenues as we leveraged higher sales with a strong focus on managing costs. Engineering expense was $48 million, modestly lower than Q1 last year. We continue to invest engineering resources in current business opportunities, but more importantly, we are investing in our future as an industry leader in decarbonization and digital technologies that improve our customers' productivity, capacity utilization, and safety. Now let's take a look at the segment results on slide 12, starting with the freight segment. As I already discussed, freight segment sales were up 17.2% during the quarter. GAAP segment operating income was $368 million for an operating margin of 20.2%, up 5.7 percentage points versus last year. GAAP operating income includes $3 million of restructuring costs, primarily related to integration 2.0 and portfolio optimization costs. Adjusted operating income for the freight segment was $439 million, up 48.3% versus the prior year. Adjusted operating margin in the freight segment was 24.1%, up 5.1 percentage points from prior year. The increase was driven by improved gross margin behind strong operational execution, favorable mix, improved pricing, integration 2.0 savings, and as we lap last year's investment in our next generation digital development costs. At the same time, SG&A and engineering expenses were lower as a percentage of revenue. Finally, segment 12-month backlog was $5.67 billion, up 14.5% from the same period a year ago. The multi-year backlog was $17.9 billion, down 2.3% from the prior year. Both our 12-month and multi-year backlogs demonstrate good visibility in 24 and beyond. Turning to slide 13, transit segment sales were up 5.5% to $673 million. When adjusting for foreign currency, transit sales were up 4.9%. GAAP operating income was $74 million. Restructuring costs related to integration 2.0 were $7 million in Q1. Adjusted segment operating income was $86 million. Adjusted operating margin as a percent of revenue was 12.7%, down 0.2 percentage points from last year, driven by unfavorable mix and higher input costs, partially offset by integration 2.0 savings. Finally, transit segment 12-month backlog for the quarter was $2.04 billion, up 3.3% versus a year ago. The multi-year backlog was also up 4.2%, to $4.19 billion. Now let's turn to our financial position on slide 14. First quarter cash flow was $334 million. During the quarter, cash flow benefited from higher earnings, improved working capital, and increased securitization funding. We continue to expect greater than 90% cash conversion for the full year. Our balance sheet and financial position continue to be strong. we ended the quarter with liquidity of $2.13 billion. And our net debt leverage ratio was 1.7 times at the end of the first quarter, which was favorable versus the same quarter a year ago at 2.3 times debt leverage. We continue to allocate capital in a disciplined and balanced way to maximize returns for our shareholders. During the quarter, we repurchased $175 million of our shares and paid $36 million in dividends, which was recently increased by our board of directors of 17.6% per share versus prior year. With that, I'd like to turn the call back over to Rafael to talk about our 2024 financial guidance.
spk04: Thanks, John. Now let's turn to slide 15 to discuss our 2024 updated full year guidance. As you've heard today, our team delivered a very strong start to the year. We believe that the underlying customer demand for our products and solutions continues across our business. Our orders pipeline and 12-month backlog continue to be strong, providing visibility for the profitable growth ahead. With these factors in mind, we are increasing our previous guidance. We now expect 2024 sales of $10.4 billion at the midpoint, up 7.5% from last year. and adjusted EPS to be between $7 and $7.40 per share, up about 21.5% at the midpoint. Finally, we continue to expect cash flow conversion to be greater than 90%. Looking ahead, I am confident that Wabtec's well-positioned to drive profitable growth in 2024 and beyond. Now let's wrap up on slide 16. As you've heard today, our team continues to deliver value for our stakeholders, thanks in large part to our resilient install base, world-class team, innovative technologies, and our continued focus on our customers. Overall, we believe we have an opportunity to continue building significant long-term momentum with growth in modernizations, in new locomotive sales, in digital solutions, and in transit systems. With solid underlying demand across the portfolio, increased visibility through our backlog, and intense focus on continuous improvement and cost management, WAPTAC is well-positioned to drive profitable long-term growth and maximize shareholder returns. With that, I want to thank you for your time this morning, and I'll turn now to call over to Kyra to begin the Q&A portion of our discussion. Kyra?
spk00: Thank you, Raphael. We will now move on to questions, but before we do, and out of consideration for others on the call, I ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question. And if you have additional questions, please rejoin the queue. Operator, we are now ready for our first question.
spk03: We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Our first question comes from Justin Long with Stevens. Please go ahead.
spk06: Thanks and good morning. Good morning, Justin. So I think the most surprising part of this quarter was the big sequential improvement in freight margins. And I wanted to ask if there was anything unique to this quarter that drove that improvement? Or does this just speak to the operating leverage in the business as equipment revenue ramps? And John, if there's anything you can share on how freight margins are expected to progress over the rest of the year, what's baked in the guidance versus what we just saw in the fourth quarter, the 24%.
spk02: Great, Justin. When we look at the freight margins up 5.1 percentage points, We do not expect to end the year of 5.1 percentage points. There are a few things in there that are going to bring it down over the course of the back half. But overall, our margins are building from our guidance, from the last guidance to this guidance. We feel very good about the way the year is going. But specifically, Justin, on freight margins, let's talk about a couple of those pieces. One, there was great operational execution that led to increased productivity. That, we would expect, would continue. When we look at a couple other things, one, mix was very favorable. And we expect mix to be favorable in the first half, but we do expect mix to turn unfavorable in the back half. So that will be a drag on freight margins a bit in the back half of the year. The second piece is that there was a fair amount of absorption in the quarter, given the 17.2% growth of the freight segment. We don't expect the back half of the year to have such rich revenue growth, and therefore we would expect that to be more neutral in the back half. And then finally, during the quarter, Justin, we lapped an investment that we made in the year-ago period, if you remember, for our next-generation digital development of a PDS software. And as lapping that in the first quarter of this year, that's adding about a third of the overall margin benefit to the enterprise overall, so a little bit more in the freight group. So we don't expect that to repeat. But again, as we look to the back half of the year in freight, we expect margins to be up, but just not the same extent as you're seeing in the first quarter.
spk06: Okay, got it. Thanks. And I guess, secondly, we have the proposed locomotive regulations from CARB. I know The public comments around that were due to the EPA earlier this week. But do you have any color around the timing of a final decision on that front? And if the current proposal does pass, any initial thoughts on how quickly this could impact your business based on some of the recent conversations you've had with customers?
spk04: So, Justin, you're right there. I mean, the public comment period was due last Monday. They had a public hearing. I think the outcome here of the rule remains, I'd say, quite fluid. What I'll tell you is we're technically very well positioned here to support customers for all outcomes. We've got the best-in-class products. We've got the lowest emissions, the lowest fuel consumption, best reliability, ultimately best availability and value for customers there. One thing that I would want to highlight is the EPA also recently finalized the new standards for highway vehicles, which requires manufacturers to reduce greenhouse gas by 25% for the heavy truck fleet. And the EPA also defined through that that liquid hydrogen for internal combustion engines would be classified as zero emissions, despite of using some oil. And this is important as it allows first for our install base of internal combustion engines to use hydrogen, which can be a transition to fuel cells ultimately. But I call this out because this definition of zero emissions I think plays well into our plans to help railroads transition to near zero emissions with really a reversible solution here through that period.
spk06: Okay. Thanks for the time, and congrats on the quarter. Thank you.
spk03: Okay, the next question comes from Bascom Majors with Susquehanna. Please go ahead.
spk09: Thanks for taking my questions. Just to follow up on that, John or Raphael, less about this year but more long-term, can you go a little bit deeper into the favorability of mix given the growth and some of the sub-segments, be it equipment? or the modification side of services that you've typically talked about as being a little bit lower mix than some of your businesses and how that was able to drive such meaningful gross profit expansion, not just the fixed cost absorption and just how you view that in a longer term context relative to your long term incremental margin guidance of the 25 to 30%. Thank you.
spk04: Let me start here because number one, we're confident on the fundamentals of the business. I mean, we've had a strong performance over the last years and now in this quarter, and hopefully comes through here, the team's commitment and the robustness of the strategy. I think we're continuously innovating. I think that's been a key piece, even if you think about mods or new locos. We're continuously adapting to some of these market changes to ensure we remain in a good We've been actively managing our pipeline to really convert some of these opportunities into tangible results. I think we've also continued to take proactive steps when challenges arise in this process. I think it's important to highlight that you're going to continue to see variation on quarters, yearly results. But we're confident here in our ability to continue to drive profitable growth over time in the business. I'll let John comment on the specifics of the quarter and the half.
spk02: Yeah, Baskerman, and when we look at locos and mods over the long term, we would expect it to provide a headwind on overall mix. And again, we've talked about this. There's good mix and bad mix. And this is a really good mix because it puts an asset out there that we're going to make money off of for decades to come. But if we look more nearer in, when we look at in the first quarter, as well as the first half, we are actually getting some mixed favorability from locos and mods because of what we're comparing to in the year-ago period. If you remember in the year-ago period, we had talked about an international order that we delivered over four quarters, the back half of 22 and the front half of 23. That was very low margin as we moved into a market. So that's providing some of the mix that you're seeing. And that'll just be in the first half. And again, as I mentioned to Justin, we'll start to reverse in the back half. I think, Baskin, the other thing I'd like to point out, as we look at the overall cadence of the year, we talked about this last quarter, but we do expect the significant majority of our revenue growth and our profit growth to be in the first half of the year. And this is really due to the production of those locos and mods. You know, as we came out of last year in the strike, we had the production or deliveries of our locos and mods being significantly lower in the first half of the year versus the back half of the year. And our aim this year is to more level load our quarters in that production. So with that, we expect locos and mods to be up about 30% in terms of deliveries in the first half of the year and down slightly in the back half. And what that's going to do is shift a fair amount of revenue into the first half. And with that will come that absorption that we talked about. And again, the mix is favorable in the first half and a little bit unfavorable in the back half. When we look at the back half, we expect it to be favorable on a year-over-year basis, both for revenue growth and for margin growth, but at a much more tempered level than we see in the first half. Overall, leading to the guidance that we delivered which is an improvement in revenue growth as well as more profit margin growth.
spk03: Thank you.
spk02: Thanks.
spk03: The next question comes from Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
spk01: Thanks for taking my question, and congrats on the solid quarter. Just wanted to talk about your decarbonization slide. Very strong performance there in just the second half deliveries. in terms of your targets for some of the alternative fuels is very impressive. So just curious, as you think about or you have conversations with customers, what are you hearing in terms of the benefits of some of these improvements that you're making in enabling your engines to deliver some of these savings? How is that impacting overall discussions, order patterns, and expectations as we think about second half and then flowing into 2025?
spk04: Yeah, so a couple comments there. Number one, this has been really part of a long-term strategy on making sure that we have the most really fuel-efficient, and fuel is a significant part of the expenses for our customers. So we continue those investments there. I think there's continued opportunity to take advantage of both the Tier 4s and the mods, and I do believe we have some of the best products there in the market. We see that playing not just in North America. We see that playing internationally as well. We really like the opportunity here, and I think customers welcome the ability to transition from a known core product and be able to really take advantage of that to significantly reduce carbon emissions. And our engines, I'd say, are well prepared to take on both renewable and biofuels industries. and uh we're progressing here on really making sure hydrogen uh is also a part of that solution so with that i think we're very well positioned uh to support customers through that transition but we're also working on what i call zero emissions technologies which start with uh some of the elements of the hybrid units that we're delivering this quarter uh to new york and uh we're also delivering later this year the first really heavy haul battery electric locomotive that's going to Australia, which one we unveiled last year. So I think we're, with that, continuing to pace some of our investments here in the light of adoption. But with Bell, we're very well positioned in that regard. And we really try to make sure we make our engines as agnostic as we can to make sure that we provide that reversibility for customer authorization.
spk01: Very helpful. Thank you. And then shifting over to capital allocation, just strong performance in the first quarter, strong performance around the cost management. But as you think about the strong balance sheet that you have and ability to return cash to shareholders, Should we expect that there's potential for bigger buybacks and deploying more capital to shareholders? Or how are you kind of seeing, you know, you talked about the raise of the dividend, but kind of the other outlets of cash, how should we kind of think about that for the full year?
spk02: Yeah, Angel, number one is we expect a fair amount of free cash for the year. But we've got the balance sheet where we want it. And when I say that, it's in that zone of two to two and a half times net debt leverage ratio, right? We're toward the low end of that, and we feel comfortable with that at this point as well. Having said that, the cash that we generate, we will prioritize, or the free cash, we will prioritize first M&A if we find good, accretive, strategic M&A. And then, if not, we'll return the excess cash to our shareholders in the form of share repurchases. and feel good about the start to the year in terms of share repurchases with 175 million purchased. But we're looking to return all of our excess cash to our shareholders throughout the year.
spk01: Very helpful. Thank you.
spk03: Our next question comes from Scott Group with Wolf Research. Please go ahead.
spk08: Good morning. This is Ivan Yee on for Scott Group. Good morning. Morning. I want to touch on pricing here, and I know you guys don't really give out any core pricing numbers, but can you directionally talk about how the pricing trends are kind of going, and what are your expectations for pricing sort of the rest of this year? Thank you.
spk02: Hi, Ivan. You know, when we look at overall pricing in the quarter, pricing was up slightly, and our costs were slightly favorable, and so that helped provide a little bit of margin improvement in the quarter.
spk03: The next question comes from Matt Elcott with TD Cowan. Please go ahead.
spk12: Good morning. Thank you. Raphael, I think you mentioned industry locomotive fleet in North America was down, but WAPTEC was up. Is this just a matter of what we already know, the railroads are coalescing behind WAPTEC locomotives increasingly? How much is trip optimizer a factor in that and Any other thoughts on that would be helpful?
spk04: So I think first, I mean, I think there's certainly an element of alcohol overall life cycle cost that those units provide. And that's how you got to keep that in mind. And those are investments that have been done over time that have really positioned our fleets to number one, be the most efficient fleets at an engine level. So it starts there. It's continuous. If you think about our ability to provide service and support to those fleets. So our customers ultimately get not just the fuel efficiency, but they get the reliability and availability of those units. And that goes with significant investments we've made over time on an engineering team that are able to really drive what I call continuous improvement to those fleets. over time, and really the service network that we've got and our ability to support customers across the globe on that. On the top of that, you include some of the elements of really the digital investments we've made and we continue to make to help customers improve not just fuel efficiency, but to improve safety and to improve the various elements that they need. So, I think this is really a validation of the investments we continue to make and the differentiation we continue to create in the product.
spk12: Got it. That's very helpful. And just one follow-up question. I think, John, you know, back in February at the plan tour, you mentioned $110 million of revenue this year that could be discontinued to optimize margins. Could you provide an update on that?
spk02: Yeah, we're moving forward with the exit of what we call low-margin revenue from the business, right? So, Matt, when we look at that midpoint of our new guidance at 7.5%, it actually is higher than that, given the fact that we're taking out that $110 million. The majority of that will come out this year, but some of it will move into next year as we're working through exit strategies for different product lines.
spk12: Great. Thanks, John. Thanks, Rafael.
spk02: Thank you.
spk03: The next question comes from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
spk05: Hi, this is Clayon for Jerry. Quick question on the transit segment. You know, you've had steady margin improvement in transit over the last couple of years. Do you view the bulk of the operational improvement in the business as now complete?
spk04: No, we don't. In fact, I think there's continued opportunity here to drive profitable growth in the business. First, some comments in the quarter. I think they were very much in line with the expectations we had, and those were some of them tied to the higher OE growth. We had high input costs, and some of that was offset by integration to that old savings. But On one hand, while we're pleased with the overall progress that the business has had, we are continuing significant work there to simplify the footprint, to further improve and sustain margins. So I think we're going to continue to see that variation quarter to quarter, but the team here is very much committed to continue expanding margins taking action to drive profitable growth and being more selective, too, in terms of the opportunities we tackle, in terms of the differentiation we're able to provide in the products that we have.
spk05: Thanks. And along the same lines, in transit on top line, you've had solid book to bill for a while now. Based on your upcoming bids, what level of sales growth is sustainable for this segment over the next couple of years?
spk04: As we look at longer term and over time, it's probably a range of 3% to 5%. It's probably a range that we should keep it in mind. But we continue to see a favorable book to build there. And I just would emphasize the first comment I made in terms of us being more and more selective about the opportunities that are out there.
spk05: Thanks. I'll pass it on.
spk03: The next question comes from Sari Boroditsky with Jefferies. Please go ahead.
spk07: Good morning. This is James. I'm for Sari. Thanks for taking questions. So I wanted to go back on alternative fuels here. So I think rails are – I mean, while rails are focused on reducing CO2 emissions, I think fuel cost and efficiency also play a critical role here. So can you kind of talk about the economics of using alternative fuels such as biodiesel and renewable?
spk04: They vary, really, across the globe, depending on both the availability and the elements of alcohol subsidies that could play out there. And I think that's really been a key piece of our strategy, which is ultimately making sure that we've got that flexibility to support customers. So you might have a renewable diesel available in a certain part of the country. You might not have it in all parts of the country. How you make sure you ultimately have an engine that's agnostic to that And playing right into it, we're seeing also government support in terms of creating potentially some areas where you might have hydrogen that might play a role. And we look at this being, again, how you help our customers transition as some of that I'll call a place over time with reversible technology. And I think that's a key piece. without really making sure you don't lose sight of the development of what I call zero-emission technologies, which plays into the battery electric. It plays ultimately into utilizing higher and higher hydrogen mix, which could lead to fuel cell. But some of those are much farther out in terms of the opportunity to adopt, in terms of the maturity of the technology, and in terms of the economics that it needs to get to.
spk07: Got it. Thanks for the caller. And as a follow up, I kind of wanted to go back on the margins again. So back in investor day, you kind of talked about expanding margin by 250 to 300 BPS in the next five years. But given such a strong margin performance in first quarter 2024, despite like more temporary expectation for the back half, are you kind of thinking differently about the long term margin target? Or are you still kind of like looking for 250 to 300 BPS margin expansion? Thank you.
spk02: Yeah, James, as we look forward in the business, we believe we see the mid-single digits on the revenue side and the double digits on the EPS side. Nothing has changed based on our performance of this year or last year in terms of our longer-term view of the industry and our performance within that industry.
spk04: I think we continue to see opportunity to drive a profitable growth ahead. I think that's important, and At the same note, you're going to have, again, variation, whether it's quarter to quarter, half over half. But there's strong momentum here in both the pipeline and both North America and internationally. And I think the other piece we sometimes don't talk enough is just the ongoing lean initiatives, the progress on integration 2.0, the portfolio optimization efforts. I mean, those two things combined really provide us an opportunity here for both margin and revenue expansion.
spk03: Great, thank you. The next question comes from Adam Roszkowski with Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk10: Hi, it's Adam Roszkowski. I'm for Ken Hexter. Question for John. Could you provide an update on the 75 to 90 million run rate cost savings by 2025 and where you are now?
spk02: Yeah, Adam, when we look at the cost from a cost standpoint, we are about $125 million down the runway of what we were expecting of 135 to 165. And that's kind of realized in the first two years. And from a standpoint of savings, we were on a run rate savings base at $22 million a year as we exited 2023. And with that, Adam, we are ramping up to that 75 to 90 million that you mentioned as we exit 2025. So we would expect an escalation of, you know, the 60, midpoint, 60, 65, wherever the midpoint is over the next couple years. And we'd expect that to be somewhat linear. But most of the projects have all been approved and are in different phases of execution, and some are actually completing as well. And so we would expect those savings to ramp pretty quickly over the next two years.
spk10: Helpful. Thank you. And then you've given some good kind of one half, second half margin and profit commentary. You know, given the sort of elevated impact from last year, you called out about a third of the gain was due to that one time item. Should we expect the same magnitude of freight margin kind of year over year expansion to continue into the second quarter? Should that, you know, drop off a bit? Any color you could give us there? Thanks.
spk02: Yeah, when we look at from a growth perspective, margin growth perspective, we would expect the preponderance of that growth to be in the first half. We do expect growth, Adam, in the back half, but not nearly at the level that we're seeing in the first half. And again, the first half is aided by the fact that revenue is is going to be significantly, the significant majority of revenue will be in the first half. And therefore, the P&L leverage will follow that. And as we've talked about, mix is going to be favorable in the first half and the second half. So we will see a step down in the revenue growth. It will grow and we'll see a step down in the margin growth. But on a full year basis, you know, we'll exit at our revised guidance and we feel good about that. When we look at the second quarter, We expect the second quarter to be a strong quarter, again, based on the production shifts that we've made, as well as the mix that we've talked about. I don't think it'll be at the same level of revenue growth or margin growth, but it'll be certainly a good quarter. And then, again, back half will be more tempered growth.
spk03: Thank you.
spk02: Thank you, Adam.
spk03: The next question comes from Steve. Barger with KeyBank Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk11: Thanks. If we do get an accelerated domestic locomotive cycle driven by regulatory changes, would you anticipate change orders and cancellations for mods, or would you think that would all be additive to the backlog?
spk04: There's certainly a choice to be made, but it's really very customer-specific. So I wouldn't say... There would be necessarily a complete reversal of that, and I do not expect cancellations in that regard, but there would certainly be an element of more thoughts towards really moving forward with the newer technology, especially as we include in that technology the ability to take on those alternative fuels. I think that really provides the customer here what I call the safe net to transition over time with the reversibility they need.
spk11: understood thanks and raphael following up on the hydrogen conversation you said wab is pacing investment to market adoption rates but it's also come up several times on this call do you expect to see hydrogen equipment on track within the next say five years or is that mainline hydrogen equipment more 2030 and beyond just to kind of level set expectations
spk04: So two comments. I do expect hydrogen to be, I'm going to call, both tested and there could be an element here if government potentially steps in to create some corridors where you might be able to introduce that as an alternative fuel into the internal combustion engine. If your question is more around 100% hydrogen utilization, that's later down the road. And that goes with fuel cells. That goes with irreversible technology. So that's going to take a bit more time on that. So that's not in the near or mid-term.
spk11: Yeah, I wasn't even thinking about 100% adoption. I was just thinking about the idea that you can have a legitimate freight hauling piece of equipment on the tracks in, say, five years? Is the technology there?
spk04: So we do that similarly. We do that today with LNG. We have a deck car that ultimately you have an engine that's able to mix up to 78% of LNG. So you should think along the same lines. At the same time, if there's any issues as you're running or the availability of fuel is not there, you're still able to complete the mission with the current engine that you have on. So I think you could expect to see some experimentation there. There could even be some corridors, but I think it's still going to be a niche application.
spk11: Understood.
spk03: Thanks.
spk04: Thank you.
spk03: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Kyra Yates for any closing remarks.
spk00: Thank you, Dave, and thank you, everyone, for your participation today. We look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Goodbye.
spk03: The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer