This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Good day, everyone. Welcome to Western Alliance Bank Corporation's fourth quarter 2023 earnings call. You may also view the presentation today via webcast through the company's website at www.westernalliancebankcorporation.com. I'd now like to turn the call over to Myles Bundelic, Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Development. Please go ahead.
spk14: Thank you and welcome to the Western Alliance Bank's fourth quarter 2023 conference call. Our speakers today are Ken Beccione, President and Chief Executive Officer, Dale Gibbons, Chief Financial Officer, and Tim Bruckner, Chief Banking Officer. We'll join for Q&A. Before I hand the call over to Ken, please note that today's presentation contains forward-looking statements which are subject to risk, uncertainty, and assumptions, except as required by law, the company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements. For more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties that cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, please refer to the company's SEC filing, including the form I gave out yesterday, which are available on the company's website. Now, for opening remarks, I'd like to turn the call over to Ken Becchione.
spk03: Thank you, Miles, and good morning, everyone. I'll make some brief comments about our fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings before turning the call over to Dale, who will review our financial results in more detail after I discuss our 2020 24 Outlook, Tim Bruckner will join us as usual for Q&A. Western Alliance's diversified national commercial business strategy continued to drive strong momentum in the fourth quarter as we generated earnings per share of $1.33 or $1.91, excluding 58 cents of one-time notable items. The quarter featured both healthy balance sheet growth and additional balance sheet repositioning actions to further optimize our funding base. Looking past these notable items, which Dale will explain shortly, highlights for the quarter included solid loan and deposit growth, ongoing capital and liquidity accumulation, and continued stable asset quality. Deposit growth of $1 billion allowed us to continue to selectively reduce debt and borrowings. In Q4, we fully repaid $1.3 billion of advances from the bank term funding program, as well as a $300 million, 6.5% AmeriHome senior notes, which were not replaced with new borrowings. Regarding the AmeriHome notes, we seized an opportunity to repay this higher cost debt at a discount. Additionally, our portion of the industry-wide FDIC special assessment to replenish the deposit insurance fund totaled $66.3 million. Loans rose $850 million in the quarter bolstered by CNI growth within our regional footprint. West Alliance begins 2024 supported by a strong capital base and liquidity position. CDT-1 expanded approximately 150 basis points during the year to 10.8%, which equates to 9.8% when including AOCI. 80% of our deposits are either insured or collateralized, which ranks among the highest levels of the 50 largest U.S. banks. Despite the industry's challenges, our total deposits increased 3% year-over-year. Asset quality also remains in very good shape, with limited net charge-offs of only six basis points of average loans in 2023. Limited realized losses amidst a normalized credit backdrop is indicative, in our view, of the merits of lending with low advance rates, adhering to conservative underwriting standards, and approaching credit mitigation proactively. Continuing to shift our funding base from borrowings to core deposits better positions us to grow loans in a rate environment and flux likely to decline later this year. We have made investments and leadership additions in order to drive increased C&I growth in our regional footprint, expand fee income opportunities across client relationships, and complement the growth in our national business lines, particularly our leading deposit-focused vertical. Overall, in 2024, we look forward to consistent balance sheet and BPNR growth with higher liquidity and improving capital. This will empower Western Alliance to continue partnering with our clients on their most important projects. Dale will now take you through the financial performance. Afterwards, I will provide you with our 2024 outlook.
spk16: Thank you, Ken. For the year, Western Alliance produced net revenue of $2.6 billion, net income of $722 million, and EPS of $654 million. Net revenue increased 3% from the prior year, demonstrating the durability and flexibility of our business model. Net interest income rose $123 million, or approximately 6%, to over $2.3 billion, notwithstanding our curtailed loan growth and the completion of a series of asset sales earlier in the year. Non-interest income declined $44 million to $281 million from repositioning actions, the impact of fair value marks, as well as a slower mortgage purchase market. Non-nutrient expense of $1.6 billion increased $466 million year-over-year, primarily due to higher earnings credit rates and deposit costs driven by the rising rate environment. Turning to the fourth quarter trends and business drivers, we generated reported pre-provision net revenue of $220 million, net income of $148 million, and EPS of $1.33. As part of the balance sheet optimization efforts conducted earlier to support and improve our earnings trajectory, We repaid $300 million of AmeriHome senior notes at a discount. We utilized this gain to better position the balance sheet by selling securities as well as MSR fair value adjustments in sales, which combined produced a pre-tax loss of $4.5 million, in addition to the $66 million FDIC special assessment. When excluding these one-time notable items, we generated adjusted net income of $211 million and EPS of $1.91. Net interest income increased $4.7 million during the quarter to $592 million from higher average earning asset balances and reduced higher cost borrowings. GAAP non-interest income was $91 million, or excluding local items, $126 million, which was down approximately $3 million from Q3. During the quarter, Wall sold approximately $200 million of mortgage servicing rights, which improved our capital ratios, despite incurring a loss of $11 million on disposition. As prepayment speeds began to recover from historically low levels, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights moved lower at an accelerated pace, which resulted in a $14 million fair value adjustment net of hedging. We don't believe this aggregate $25 million charge is indicative of the earnings profile of our mortgage banking business. Lot volume has rebounded 29% year-over-year and may be indicative of continued momentum into 2024. Since the December rate rally and resulting lower mortgage rates, we have experienced incremental refinance volume and firming margins. Should mortgage rates trend lower in future quarters, we would expect this business to benefit, which has not been captured in our go-forward guidance. Additionally, income from equity investments was elevated by approximately $8 million due to outside gains from solar tax credit investments with higher than expected performance during the quarter. Gap non-interest expense was $462 million, or excluding noted items, $435 million, a quarterly increase of $9 million. Deposit cost growth slowed markedly, increasing $3 million in Q4 as our settlement services and homeowners association businesses bringing strong growth to new customers that surpassed seasonal declines in mortgage warehouse. Provision expense was $9.3 million, reflecting steady asset quality. Lastly, our effective tax rate of approximately 30% was temporarily elevated in Q4, primarily because of timing issues related to low-income housing units that were not placed into service in 2023. The 2024 tax rate should reset to 22% to 23%. Loan sales for investment grew $850 million to $50.3 billion, while deposits increased $1 billion to $55.3 at quarter end. Organ servicing rights declined to $1.1 billion from MSR sales and reduced valuations resulting from the lower rate environment. Overall, we continue to build high-quality liquid asset levels and unbalance cheap liquidity via strong deposit growth. Debt repayments previously discussed reduced investments in cash by $351 million from September 30th. Strong deposit growth over the last three quarters has allowed us to cut total borrowings and debt by half from the end of Q1. Finally, tangible book value per share increased $3.06 or 7% over the prior quarter and 16% year-over-year in 46-72 for retained earnings and reduced drag from negative all other comprehensive incomes. Loans held for investment growth was predominantly from CNI categories, some of which were rooted in higher-end line utilization. Construction and land loans are up $220 million, with a little under half of this contribution from lot banking. Given the national undersupply of homes and a greater likelihood of near-term rate cuts, we are still positive about the macroeconomics for this business. Deposit growth of $1 billion was achieved despite typical seasonal declines in mortgage warehouse deposits related to tax and insurance payments. We continue to experience broad-based growth from our specialized value-added deposit channels. HOA had its best Q4 ever, and we believe it will retain and possibly extend its leading market share in the country that it achieved in Q3 of last year. Settlement services, tech and innovation, corporate trust, and our digital consumer channel all grew materially and contributed to well-diversified growth. Noninterest-bearing DDAs comprise 26% of total deposits, of which 45% have no cash payment of earnings credits. The decline in noninterest-bearing balances was primarily driven by the expected $3 billion decrease from typical mortgage warehouse seasonality of property tax and insurance escrow funds. There has been no client attrition associated with these outflows, and this decline is recovering as anticipated this quarter. Printing out a net deposit net interest driver's HFI loan yield decreased eight basis points due to the full quarter impact of the $1.3 billion reclassification of loans from held for sale to held for investment at the end of Q3. This coincidentally resulted in held for sale yields climbing 31 basis points. Going forward, we anticipate HFI yields to continue to be supported by an average of $2.9 billion of loans repricing or maturing per quarter in 2024. The old bond total investments expanded eight basis points in Q4 to 4.99%. The securities portfolio grew $1.9 billion to $13 billion from the ongoing HQLA bill, which has increased Treasury from $900 million at the end of Q1 of last year to approximately $4.9 billion at year end. The cost of interest-bearing deposits increased seven basis points, markedly slower than the prior quarter, and the total cost of funds increased two basis points to 2.82%, due to an increase in demand deposits and lower short-term borrowings. The deposit growth enabled a $768 million increase reduction in average short-term borrowings, as well as six basis points of improvement in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. In aggregate, net interest income increased approximately $5 million, while the net interest margin of $365 came in at the midpoint of our Q4 guidance. As net interest income growth was exceeded by the growth rate of average earning assets. Non-interest expenses were impacted by $27 million in net notable items this quarter. Adjusting for these one-time items as well as deposit costs, our adjusted efficiency ratio rose 100 basis points to 51%. We expect deposit costs will experience relief from a cessation of rate hikes and should fall as rates decline. For historical context, average ECR balances were $19.9 billion in the fourth quarter, compared to $17 billion in Q3 and $15.4 billion in Q4 of 22. We expect ECR-related deposits to remain a consistent relative proportion of our deposit base as total deposits grow. Based upon our rate forecast and generally high beta repricing for ECR-related deposits, such pricing to largely decline and lockstep with rate cuts, offsetting any potential net interest margin declines. Asset quality metrics continue to remain stable and in line with what we reported last quarter. The aggregate net increase in special mention loans and classified assets was only $7 million from the Q3 level. Non-performing assets increased to $281 million, equating to 40 basis points in total assets, which is five basis points above the third quarter. Quarterly net loan charge-offs were 8.5 million, or seven basis points of average loans, which was aligned with Q3 net charge-offs. Provision expense of 9.3 million was a function of loan growth and a slightly improved Moody's consensus forecast. Though our consensus and severely versed weightings for our ACL still incorporated 80% recessionary outlook. Our allowance increased 10 million from the prior quarter to 337 million, and the ACL ratio with 73 basis points, covering 135% of non-performing loans. Looking at the reserve loss, you'll see an updated look on the contacts behind our allowance, which when considering insured loans and those in low loss categories, the allowance shifts up to 1.31% of loans. Our CEG-1 ratio rose 20 basis points to 10.8%, or 9.8% when adjusted for the AOCI debit. For tangible common equity, the total assets grew approximately 50 basis points from Q3 to 7.3% from earnings and the improved AOCI position. Tangible foot value per share increased $3.06 from Q3 to $46.72 from earnings and recapture of AOCI marks. The $220 million improvement in AOCI resulted from substantial decreases in intermediate-term treasury rates during the quarter. Our consistent upward trajectory and tangible book value per share has outpaced peers by almost 5x since 2013, including strong growth in 2023. Over most time periods, Western Alliance continues to generate a top quartile total short-run return relative to both asset size peers and the regional banking index. I'll hand the call back to Ken.
spk03: Thanks, Dale. Our guidance for 2024 is to build on the second half momentum of 2023 and progress towards returning to above industry returns. In the first half of 2024, the company will emphasize liquidity growth over loan growth, drive capital above 11%, and further build our HQIA portfolio, which will temper earnings growth for the first half of the year. As these goals are achieved, earnings momentum will accelerate in the second half of 2024 and into 2025. So for the full year of 2024, we expect continued thoughtful balance sheet growth driven by our diversified business model with an origination mix designed to drive net interest income above 2023 levels. Loan and core deposits are expected to grow $2 billion and $8 billion respectively for the year. Core deposits-driven growth should continue to push our loan-to-deposit ratio towards a mid-80% level by the middle of this year. Regarding capital, we are targeting a CEP1 ratio above 11%, reflecting steady organic capital accumulation in concert with balance sheet growth. Ventures income should grow 5% to 10% from a Q4 2023 annualized jumping-off point. This forecast assumes four 25 basis point cuts back-loaded in the year. We expect any future NIM compression resulting from the rate cuts to be matched by comparable deposit cost decline in non-interest expense, which will be accretive to earnings. Non-interest income should increase 10 to 20 percent from an adjusted 2023 baseline level of 397 million, which excludes 2023's mark-to-market adjustments and the impact of asset sales as we prioritize growing commercial banking-related fee income from holistic customer relationships. Mortgage banking-related income will be somewhat dependent on the rate environment and mortgage buying, I should say, and mortgage buying. But we're encouraged that with the recent low rate environment, application volume is picking up with firmer margins thus far in early 2024. Non-interest expense, inclusive of the ECR-related deposit costs, should rise only 0% to 2% from an annualized adjusted Q4 baseline of $1,740,000,000 and allow for continued operating leverage. In aggregate, these factors will enable WAL to consistently grow PPNR throughout the year. Asset quality remains manageable and we project continued of support from our sponsors. Based on our conservative underwriting and low advance rates, net charge-offs are expected to be 10 to 15 basis points a year as the economic cycle normalizes. Lastly, we expect the effective tax rate to revert between 22 and 23% starting in Q1. At this time, Tim, Dale, and I are happy to take your questions.
spk01: Thank you. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, you can press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. Please ensure you're unmuted locally when asking your question. Our first question for today comes from Casey Hare of Jefferies. The line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk06: Yeah, thanks. Good morning, everyone. So wanted to start on the four cuts and how that impacts the PPNR guide. Obviously hits you guys a number of ways. Dale, I think you said that it does not, your fees does not account for any upside in mortgage banking. It sounds like the deposit costs within expenses are 100% beta. Can you just confirm that and then The four cuts, how would that – what kind of deposit beta are you expecting for, you know, the non-ECR component and how that would impact NII?
spk16: Yeah, in aggregate, I mean, to getting to PPR, the net impact is fairly nominal. I mean, as we've indicated in the past, if you just look at net interest income, we're modestly asset sensitive, so that would be a little bit of a decrement. But, of course, you alluded to the ECR price deposits, which we expect to fall and fall in lockstep. So put those together. We think we're, again, now modestly liability-sensitive, and we'd have a net benefit then in PPNR, excluding the AmeriHome piece, which is the call option if things get much better in that space.
spk06: Okay, so AmeriHome would be gravy if it did, but obviously if it's back half loaded, it might be modest.
spk16: Yeah, so the mix might look a little different. I mean, if you had a more accelerated rate decline, maybe you're going to see a faster decline, perhaps in net interest income, reflecting the net interest income profile that we have. But again, when you layer in the deposit cost, I think it's going to eliminate that.
spk06: Okay. And then, so the loan-to-deposit growth guide for 24, you got $6 billion of liquidity to play with. What is the plan for that? Build the bond book, build cash, pay down borrowings? Just wondering what your plans are there.
spk03: Yeah, so when I think about the year, I think about it, the first half of the year, we're building the liquidity profile, as you mentioned. With that, we're really going to build our HQLA profile. And we're looking to drive our loan to deposit ratios, as I said, in the mid 80s. From there, it's growth towards a much bigger and better 2025. So we need to continue to reposition ourselves. We think we'll have that done by the end of the second quarter. And then it'll be a little bit more traditional earnings as you see them, as you have seen them historically from us. But, you know, I would say, you know, and when you think about it, the deposit and loans are more coming in across the year in a roundable fashion. About $500 million per quarter for loans and approximately $2 billion per quarter for deposits.
spk06: Gotcha. Thank you. And then just last one, Dale, you mentioned the DDA. Sounds like it's recovering seasonally within Mortgage Warehouse. Just any update you can share on how much of that $3 billion has come back in?
spk16: Well, so it's really based upon semi-annual property tax payments, largely in California. And so we would expect that we're going to get you know, half of that or two-thirds of that, you know, this quarter and then the rest that would start coming in. The payments due in May are less dramatic in terms of kind of the dip that we see. Meanwhile, you know, other warehouse funds, you know, look to be growing consistently, and we're also off to a good start in our HOA biz for Q1. Casey, let me just add, you know,
spk03: Right now, we're on track to beat the $2 billion for our Q1, and that's inclusive of the HOA deposits coming back in.
spk06: Great. Thanks, guys.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Steven Alexopoulos from J.P. Morgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk13: Hi, everybody. I wanted to start on the margin. So you were 365 in the quarter, right in the middle of what you had guided to. Dale, for you, how should we think about the NIM trending, the backdrop of four cuts? And then it's funny, when I look at where the NIM was, we had a more normal curve. I mean, you guys were like 450, but it's a completely different balance sheet today. So assuming we eventually get a normal curve, normal level of rates like What's a reasonable NIM for this balance sheet?
spk03: So, hello, Steve. That's Ken. What I would say is, you know, again, thinking about the year, the first two quarters of the year, NIM should track consistent with our Q4 NIM of 365. And then Q3 and Q4, the NIM will gently roll down as the price, as the rate cuts come into play. but offsetting that NIM decline will be the reduction in ECR expenses.
spk16: So what's transpired is we have and we expect to continue to have considerably more liquidity on the balance sheet, and that is going to kind of depress NIM in basically a permanent basis. Where can we be kind of going forward? I think we could be close to kind of where we are. Maybe the three and a half range is kind of sustainable, kind of over over a broader economic cycle than what we'd see. We'd probably have a little bit better return on the residential portfolio than we presently have. But for the most part, I think our numbers, rather than being in the fours, I think we're destined for the three level here going forward.
spk13: Got it.
spk16: Okay.
spk13: And then on the expense guide, so you guys were $437 million on the ECR deposit costs in 2023. What's assumed within this expense guidance for 2024 for the cost of ECR deposits? Like where is that roughly?
spk16: Yeah, so that's fairly stable until we get to, as we indicated earlier, you know, we have a back end loaded, you know, four cuts starting in June in the rate. And so that would kind of curtail, you know, based upon kind of how that plays out.
spk02: When Dale gives that answer, I look at it. Sorry, Steve, I talked over you.
spk03: You're on a choppy line a little bit, Steve. But I would say, to Dale's point, is he there? Yeah, I'm here. Steve? Gotcha. I would say, just keep in mind, you're thinking about, your question is based on total dollars. And so, the rate will be coming down. You know, total dollars may still rise as we continue to push up on deposit growth. So, just keep in mind the rate volume impact there. Okay? Yep.
spk13: Got it. Okay. Ken, can I just finally ask you a big picture question? So when I look at the company, right, years back we had the financial crisis, and you guys made quite a few changes after that, right, built out national businesses. You had top decile growth for a long time. Then we had March Madness. You again pivoted, right? You made adjustments, pushing up insured deposits, changing liquidity, et cetera. When I look at the 2024 guide, it looks like more of the same in the first half, but then when we get to the second half of the year and then 2025, what does this company then look like? Do you throttle up loan growth from where we are? Do you throttle that deposit growth? Are you back to a growth bank? Like how are you see the world right now and the longer term for the company? Thanks.
spk03: Yeah. Good question. You know, we started to pivot by the way in the third quarter of 2022 with higher liquidity, and higher capital. And we certainly were very happy that we did as we entered March Madness. It really served us well. And that's informed our decision making as to why we want to keep that moving forward. And as you said, we'll have that basically completed by the first half of 2024. Then I think what you're going to see is a little bit the same bank, but I don't think we're going to put our foot on the accelerator as hard as we used to push down on the throttle there. And one reason is we never got really paid for that. So, you know, up until the end of 2022, we were probably growing deposits and loans about 24% to 25% per year, and we didn't see that in our valuation. And in fact, people always got nervous with that and said, gee, there must be a credit problem that was lurking behind. But really, over that period of time, we only had $29 million of net losses. So what we're going to do is we're going to be targeting for above industry trend growth going forward in the back half of 24 and into 25. And we think we'll get rewarded for that and take away any concerns that will always linger about going way back even to 2006 and 2007 and 2008 that people bring up. And I think we'll run from there. But we should be higher in return on equity, higher on return on assets, but not to the old levels of coming back to 2010 to 2013, 2014, 2015. Okay? Got it. Yep, that's a great caller. Thanks for taking my questions.
spk02: You're welcome.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Ibrahim Poonawalla from Bank of America. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk00: Hey, good morning. I guess maybe just one bigger picture question around earnings if I have the math right in terms of your earnings outlook. You probably shake out around eight bucks in EPS for 24. Should we expect EPS to dip in the first half before re-accelerating in the back half of the year? How do you think about earnings growth relative to the 191 you printed in the fourth quarter? Just given the moving pieces around what you're doing with HQLA, the benefit of rate cuts in the back half, I would love to hear just the earnings trajectory that you're looking at.
spk16: That's a really good question, Ibrahim, and maybe implicitly in your comments. So the first quarter generally does have a dip, and you can see this in prior years relative to 4Q, and some of this is seasonal. Everyone pays higher FICA costs. Of course, there's a fewer number of days in Q1. So if we step into that, that should have a bit of a softer point at the beginning of the year. Moving into Q2 and Q1, it's going to be impacted by what Ken's talking about in terms of continuing to build out and finish, you know, by the end of the second quarter, early in the third, our H2LA, you know, positioning. So that would result in a little lower earnings growth during those first two periods as basically the deposit growth, which we think is going to be fairly strong, is diverted into an asset class that doesn't yield as much. As that changes and as our loan to deposit ratio is in the 80s, by summer, that's going to be a more proportionate growth rate in loans as well as deposits, and hence you do get a growth rate, you know, picking up through the end of 24 and carrying into 25.
spk00: That's helpful. And I guess the other question you mentioned about never getting paid for loan growth back in the day, when we think about how you're acquiring and what type of deposits you're acquiring today, maybe, Ken, Is it different? You've obviously emphasized the regions and the deposit growth from the regions, but I'm just wondering if your view around large, chunky deposits has changed given sort of the emphasis on liquidity. And as a result of that, should we expect you to kind of go about differently when it comes to deposit growth and client acquisition?
spk03: Yeah, thanks for the question. And I think... Your question is insightful because that's how we're changing around the business. So, you know, we've been working on a number of new deposit verticals that are really getting legs behind them. And the first is settlement services. And just this quarter alone, we grew settlement services $2.1 billion. And so there, the deposits are a little larger, but the growth rate is steady and consistent. As you get to a certain level, large deposits will flow off, and then you've got to bring other large deposits in. Additionally, we have our business escrow and corporate trust business. And that, too, is beginning to get some legs. And in this quarter, that grew by $350 million. Now, that business will continue to grow, but it really will be helped once we get our investment-grade ratings back. And go back to the pivot. The pivot is to get to our investment-grade ratings so that corporate trust could be a bigger contributor to our deposits. And we think with an over 11% CDT-1 ratio, mid-80s loan-to-deposit ratio, steady asset quality, we will position ourselves to get upgraded there. Now, HOA has been a long, actually was probably our first national business line. And that continues to knock the ball out of the park. And usually what is a slow quarter, the fourth that is, they grew $300 million. For the year, they grew about $1.2 billion. And those are steady, smaller deposits. They come in from either new business that we win and the existing clients growing their book of business. So we get that two ways. Then another business that we're very pleased with was the one we started in early January, January 4th of 2023, which is our consumer digital platform. This quarter alone that brought in nearly $800 million. And that's been a real home run for us. And that's where we see deposits more in the 53 to $57,000 range for each client. Now for going forward in, 24 into 25, we're going to try to shift the platform from an outside vendor to an internal platform. And so we're going to probably run two platforms for a while as we come up to speed with our own platform. But that will help us also longer term, and it will reduce, not in 24, but going forward, 25 and 26, it will reduce some of our maintenance expenses. And then, last but not least, let's not forget, you know, what we are in our traditional ballgame here, and that is the regions. And we've been rethinking, redesigning the regions. That was the reason why we moved Tim out of his chief credit officer role into the chief banking officer for the regions. That's why we've brought in Lynn Hurden to take over the chief credit officer role. And Tim's charge is to rethink and reimagine the regions and have them be more C&I focused, And with that focus in C&I, of course, there'll be more deposits. And I should mention that $600 million came in this quarter from the regions as well in deposits. But it will also help us grow our fee income. And so we're going to get a twofer there over the long term. It'll be easier to bring in the deposits first, and then that fee income as we continue to sell or cross-sell our treasury management services will help us towards the back end of 24 but again, pick up some steam into the new year of 2025. So I hope that kind of gives you a sense of what we've been doing. And we're looking at some other deposit verticals that are just early, early stages, and we'll probably work on them this year and hope to have them ready to go either in the back end of 24 or early 25.
spk00: So that is helpful. Thanks for the rundown, Ken. And what I didn't hear was, Does this change at all your view around doing any bank M&A where you pick up a retail franchise, bring in another deposit sort of generating engine, or is that not kind of part of the equation today?
spk03: So today it's not part of the equation. We're not talking about M&A at all. You know, again, we're talking about the 11% CET1, kind of move that upward. But it will at some point, the M&A question or conversation will come in play as we continue to get bigger and bigger. If we kind of do what we think we're going to do with deposits, then that will be brought into play as we approach $100 billion. But frankly, that's a premature conversation at this point. I think we still have a couple of years before we get to $100 billion.
spk00: Perfect. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Matthew Clark of Piper Sandler. The line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk11: Hey, good morning, everyone. Just the first one on the loan growth guide at $2 billion or $500 million a quarter. I thought we had previously talked about maybe some acceleration in loan growth in the second half. Is that just you all being a little conservative in the guide to start the year, or should we not necessarily expect to step up in loan growth in the second half?
spk03: So, you know, first let me say, you know, Q4, we thought Lone Grove was going to be between zero and $300 million. And so we were a little surprised that it came in at $850. And I'd rather be surprised on the upside as a general trend. But, you know, we're still going to be a little cautious about economic activity going forward. And so we're going to be mindful of this recession or slowdown that's always has advertised to come, but has not showed up yet. And then, you know, we have sort of de-emphasized certain asset classes for now, those being obviously CRE office and residential, just to name the two, some construction areas as well. And so we're just going to stay with the guide of $500 million a quarter. We think that's reasonable. And if the liquidity comes in faster than we think, then we'll look to deploy it in loan growth. As a general rule, we've never had problems deploying our liquidity and getting good, safe, sound, and thoughtful loan growth.
spk11: Okay. And then on the fee income guide, if you look at the fourth quarter run rate, I think when you make the fair value adjustments, exclude the securities losses. I'm coming up with a run rate close to 124 million. Correct me if I'm wrong. And you annualize that. You're talking about call it 492. And your guide at the midpoint is roughly 457 off the last year's base. So maybe correct me if I'm wrong. I'm at 124. And if it is but if that is correct, you know, it only implies, you know, it implies, you know, you're down 7%, um, this year. And obviously we, you talked about not, not assuming any uptick in mortgage, but just want to get the puts and takes there of what we might not be thinking about.
spk16: Well, so we have a few things going on in the, uh, on the non-interest income side. Um, some of which we're kind of implementing now, we've got to say, um, kind of a service charge revision, you know, that we're going to be undertaking. We think as rates decline and ECRs come down, that that puts more clients into a position where their earnings credit rate does not necessarily cover all of their consumption of internal services, and that could also kind of push that up. So we think that, you know, again, we're looking for growth in that category, certainly, kind of going forward, and You don't expect to see that.
spk11: Okay. And then just last one for me on the interest-bearing deposits. Can you update us on the spot rate at the end of the year? And it seems like the pressure there is subsiding. And kind of how you think about the beta on the way down on interest-bearing specifically?
spk16: Yeah, interest-bearing deposit spot rate was 363 at year end. In terms of the beta coming down, we think it's going to be very strong. We expect betas to be certainly no slower on the way down than they were on the way up. You may recall that our betas have been faster than industry norms kind of this entire time. And our clients are expecting that, that we're watching that closely, and so are they. So I expect that we're going to be able to pull down the interest rate costs. And for those that are ECR-related, pull those down as well on the imputed yields that some of them have, which might be tied to effective set funds.
spk11: Got it. Okay, great. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Chris McGrassy of KBW. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk17: Oh, great. Good afternoon. Ken, maybe a question on the balance sheet and capital. You talked about not wanting to be in the 98th percentile or so in terms of growth perspective because you weren't getting paid for it. But you're going to be at 11% pretty soon. Can you open the door a little bit on comments about an appetite for buyback maybe in the back half of the year?
spk03: Yeah, right now we have no plans to do a buyback. And 11% is a little more of a floor for us. I know we call it a target, but it's more of a floor. So we want to build above that. And then we'll have a growth capital. And as we enter 25, Well, we're going to have a lot of decisions to make. If we see a lot of internal growth in front of us, that's where I like to deploy the money first. You've got to tell me what the economic environment is, and I'll tell you if we're going to do a buyback. But really, the buyback conversation has not been on the table in this company. And again, 11% is a flaw for us.
spk17: Okay, so nothing for 24, but perhaps you'll weigh the alternatives between accelerating the growth and using the capital. Is that a fair for 2025 conversation?
spk03: You know, we spent a lot of time talking about 25 here. I don't want to get through 24 and make everything we just told you, but for 24, I can definitely tell you there's no buyback on the table.
spk17: Okay, thank you. In terms of the balance sheet, you mentioned the HQLA bill. Are you targeting a percent of your balance sheet in securities? How do we think about just the absolute kind of bridging the $8 billion, the $2 billion, how much will go to buying incremental bonds?
spk16: Yeah. So, I mean, you can impute this from kind of our guidance, whereby we're showing, you know, a billion and a half if you just did it ratably. of growth in deposits and excess of loans. And the preponderance of that is certainly going to go to HQLA. As we talked about earlier, you know, the first half of the year, kind of getting over that hurdle that we think will be added in the summer, you know, is going to do that. So if you just did, that would be $3 billion more in terms of HQLA that we take us to there. And then at that point in time, maybe there's a more proportional growth rate between loans and deposits. But that's kind of the range of the numbers we're talking about.
spk18: Okay, great. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Bernard Von Gezeky of Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk12: Hi, guys. Just a question on ECR pricing dynamics. I know you noted the ECR-related deposit costs are expected to decline with rates and volume. Just on rates, I believe you have some deposits that pay the SED funds and others that are in the lower 3% range. So if you get a 25 basis point cut with 100% beta, does that flow through all customers or just the higher cost ECR deposits? And then you need additional rate cuts to get to the lower threes before cutting them. Or will ECR rates decline for all ECR deposits regardless of relationship?
spk16: The preponderance of our ECR price deposits are of the type that you initially talked about, i.e. those that are really tied to effective VET funds. And we think the beta with those is going to be very near 100%. The second piece where rates are significantly lower, we probably have maybe a stutter step with the first rate increase. We're not necessarily going to be able to kind of fully kind of pass through. But after that, I think we can put them on a trajectory as well. But those betas will be significantly lower. Maybe we can get to 50.
spk12: on that on that piece of it but the uh but the larger piece um i think it's going to be out here 100. and if we think about the volumes between those two uh or the balances are they much higher for the the three percent like the lower ones so once we start getting the cuts even though you have the 100 beta uh for the ones paying fed funds is it just a smaller balance i'm not sure we could size it or give um a magnitude between the two
spk16: Yeah, so between what you're going to see in terms of warehouse lending, some of the things that are settlement services, some of our HOA deposits, you're probably approximately two-thirds of the number is going to have an elevated beta.
spk12: Okay. And then if I could just ask one more. Just on your outlook guidance, just so we think about net interest income, you have the up 5% and up 10%. Could you just give us the underlying assumptions, just the difference between the two? Like what gets you to the 10%?
spk03: The 10% on the manager's income is a combination of really the loan growth as we move forward. That's what's going to move us in that direction. And the additional liquidity we're bringing in and placing that into investments.
spk16: Yeah, what does the yield curve look like? I mean, if the yield curve tends to be flatter or remains inverted, that's going to probably look a little bit better on some of these commercial loans. What does that mix look like, and how is competitive pricing changing for all those items? We don't have a lot of insight into what that might be, you know, hence the parameters around a number that might be more median.
spk12: Okay, got it. Thanks for taking my questions.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Ben Gerlinger of CISI. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Hi.
spk15: Good morning, everyone. Good morning. Just had a question. It seems, obviously, a bit more technical in nature, but it seems like loan yields were down late quarter in almost every lending category. I was curious if you could just kind of touch base on maybe the nuance of why. It might be just a technicality, like I said.
spk16: Yeah, so I did talk about a little bit on what happened on the loans held for sale versus investment, whereby we did a transfer from held for sale to investment. It really was done on the last day or just before that of the third quarter. So that full effect there dropped loan yields back to some degree. There's also kind of been some mixed revisions in there going forward. we're still seeing pricing opportunity on the repricing elements. We talked about the $2.9 billion that on average we have rolling this year. And while the piece of that that is fixed rate, that's probably in about 20% of that number, those have a more rateable increase. So even on the variable side, we're still looking at elevated spreads relative to when those loans were originated two or three years ago.
spk15: gotcha yeah that's good so the next question i had was spreads you're seeing in the market today like it seems like a lot of the 100 plus billion dollar banks are stepping back in certain categories are you seeing better spreads because there's less lenders available or less lending being done from the bigger banks or is it kind of more just calling your shots and it does you're not seeing too many different um because i mean you you do bank solid clients, so they typically would have the best rate available because it's a competitive market. I'm just trying to think about the yields going forward and especially pricing in a couple cuts in the back half of the year.
spk03: Yeah, you know, it's almost market by market dependent. There are just things going on in different markets for us. You know, if you're talking tech and innovation, you know, spreads there really haven't moved, but a little more competitive because there's less deal flow because they're raising less cash there. If you're talking some very specific lot banking deals, spreads are strong and we were getting our pricing. And some of these banks are moving in and moving out. It's really hard to give one generic answer as to are they all pulling back or not.
spk15: gotcha okay if i could just sneak one more in it seems like you said 11 is a bit of the floor going forward in capital but you also reference the credit rating the moment we get a public announcement from a credit rating agency is that a catalyst event for you guys or is it more does you get to the 11 is kind of what you guys agreed upon and you once you hit at 11 you kind of operate a bit more autonomously autonomously well you know um
spk03: The 11% is, as I said, a flaw for us. We have to engage or continue to engage with the rating agencies. That's usually a two-step process. They usually put you on outlook positive and then come back and make a change. As far as I know so far, we got a change in our outlook from Fitch, but I don't know if there's any other bank that had a change in their outlook. So my sense of the rating agencies may be a little slow to pull the trigger, but when we go in there, you know, we want to go in there with great capital levels, firm, steady, stable asset quality, and very strong liquidity. And that's how we're positioning the company. In the meantime, our corporate trust group is still operating and bringing in good business. They could just bring in more business with the upgrade to an investment rating. So they're doing just fine. This would just accelerate their opportunities to bring in more business.
spk15: Gotcha. Okay, I appreciate it. You'll probably be at 12 by the time you get that announcement, but appreciate the time, guys.
spk01: Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Brody Preston of UBS. The line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk04: Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to follow up on the loan yields. I understand the move from the HFS to HFI, but I was hoping, Dale, if you could provide what the spot rate was for the loan portfolio at the end of the quarter.
spk18: Yeah, 703.
spk04: Okay, thank you very much. I also wanted to get a better sense for the BTFP. What was the rationale behind paying off the BTFP but not more expensive borrowings? I think the last time in your 3Q10Q, I think the rate on the BTFP was 476 versus the average short-term borrowing rate of 574 this quarter. I just wanted to better understand the thought process there.
spk16: We don't, you know, frankly, we just thought, you know, we didn't need to be, you know, borrowing from the Federal Reserve. And so, you know, so we did that. I agree with you. It's at a modest cost. It was going to mature anyway. This is something that we had acquired in March of last year, and it was a 12-month deal, so it was a couple months early relative to what it would have been. We thought we just, it was part of the 2023 situation, and leave it behind in 2023 to
spk04: Got it. Thank you. I wanted to clarify just on the ECR-related deposits. I think the slide says you have $17.8 billion of ECR deposits at quarter end, but you've got about $14.5 billion of NIB. So is there another component of the ECR-related deposits that's technically still interest-bearing but also gets compensated through ECR?
spk16: Yeah, correct. So what will happen is Depending on what type of client it is, we could have a situation whereby the manager gets the ECR and the owner gets the interest income. So you don't really see that in mortgage warehouse because those are really not interest-bearing deposits. But on an HOA, for example, it's a dual situation most commonly whereby the aggregator gets an earnings credit rate on the dollars that are owned by by the HOA itself. That is not interest expense because they simply have no claim on that liability to us and the deposits of that enterprise.
spk18: So that's why it's doubled up.
spk04: Got it. And then the last question I had was just on the MSR loss. I just wanted to maybe understand the mechanics a little bit. Dale, did you you know, throughout the course of this past year, did you maybe put a higher mark on the MSR and the correspondent production, you know, like capitalize it at a higher rate and did that impact the gain on sale margin at all? And then you'd have to take a loss on it when rates moved against you and you sold the MSRs this quarter. I just want to understand the moving parts there.
spk16: No, no, no, I wouldn't say that. I mean, it was kind of the volatility around what happened. So we saw, we saw CPRs decline to the slowest that I think I'd ever seen, and maybe somebody in the business had been around, but they were at like 3% to 4% constant prepayment rates, and that is exceptionally low. And then when rates picked up again, I mean, rates fell, CPRs jumped. and maybe it was a little bit of a catch-up from refis or whatever that had been delayed. And so as a result of that, we had a gain in our hedge that fell short of the loss in terms of the valuation. So the result was the value of those servicing rights fell by $100 million in the fourth quarter, and we were $14 million shy of what we picked up in terms of gain on the hedge. And that was because we had such a rapid velocity change between a very low CPR, maybe the lowest ever, to something that was more normalized.
spk03: So I... Brody, I just want to remind you that, you know, by the end of Q4, the 10-year Treasury dropped 69 basis points from 457 to 388 to just punctuate Dale's point. And, you know, the MSR balance, we have... several outside valuation firms that come in and look at that MSR and value it for us to make sure that we're within the appropriate range.
spk04: Got it. Understood. Thank you very much for taking my questions, guys.
spk02: You're welcome.
spk01: Thank you. Our next questions come from Andrew Terrell of Stevens. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk05: Hey, good morning. Dale, if I could start just, I hear your comments around the mortgage banking and kind of the potential upside there not being captured in the go-forward guide. Just to the extent the mortgage market does turn and we do end up seeing kind of upside on the fee income front over time, can you just remind us the incremental efficiency in that business and maybe just to give us a better sense of how the expenses would fluctuate with the lift in fees?
spk16: Yeah. I mean, so when they were a standalone enterprise, they were running about 50%. And when we acquired them, you know, we were in kind of the low forties and they came in and that took us to kind of the mid, the mid, um, the mid forties. I think that's, that's basically intact today. Uh, so yeah, so it's frankly, they're marginal, um, rate of efficiency is pretty close to the banks overall. Now is the bank has invested in, you know, elements of that, you know, that are higher costs with technology and some of this risk management infrastructure. and lower investment yields related to the building of the H2LA. So right now, our efficiency ratios are comparable at about 50%.
spk05: Okay. I appreciate it. And then just looking at the deposit cost expense line this quarter, if I compare the disclosed expense on deposit cost versus the average balance of ECR deposits, it looks like on a percentage basis, The cost ticked down a few basis points this quarter. Have you lowered rates anywhere in the product already, or is that more of a function of mix this quarter?
spk16: We haven't lowered rates, but what we have done is we have one-off clients and said, look, your spread relative to, say, effective debt funds has been X, and we're going to make it X-minus. And some of this is going to happen a little, maybe perhaps a little bit later if you want to do something today, but we've given them options. You know, if you want to take a rate cut now, we'll, you know, we'll skip the next, maybe the first one you get. So we're pushing those down on a, you know, basically individually as we kind of go through this. So we are picking that up now. I think that's going to continue into January, February.
spk05: And did you see any attrition as a result of those conversations? Or is there any in color there?
spk16: Well, there hasn't been any attrition. And I think that's an input point for us in terms of, you know, what is our pricing like relative to alternatives elsewhere. I think what it means is that, you know, the fever has broken on the rate cycle. Certainly, and the opportunity to move into either other financial institutions or to move into some kind of off-balance sheet thing that maybe is invested in treasuries, all of those have fallen in terms of what the opportunity is and what they might be able to migrate to and I think that has helped us in this negotiation. We do these one-off and to some degree sequentially in case we run into a situation like that where we're starting to see some attrition and we're like, okay, well that's an important point and then we'll ease off in terms of how many we're doing or what we're asking for for them to give up.
spk05: Okay, great. Really appreciate the time this morning.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from David Smith of Autonomous. David, your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk07: Thank you. I want to circle back to those normalized NIM comments earlier in the call. Are you saying that 3.5% should be a floor or more the middle range for NIM in a typical rate cycle?
spk16: Well, that was kind of an extended conversation of where might we head over time. And getting back to a number, a poor handle, I don't see that. So, I mean, that's an extended expectation of maybe kind of where we might be. I do feel like that we're approaching kind of an equilibrium level now. And so the three and a half number is not that far from that. But I'm not That isn't our guidance in terms of kind of where we're headed in 2024. David, go ahead. Yeah.
spk07: So if there's nothing else on the NIM, talking about capital, you're going to keep doing a high-teens ROTC, and with your loan growth guide, I think that only implies something like 4% or 5% RWA growth this year. So that just seems to imply a ton of excess capital being generated, and you should reach 11% CET1 pretty soon. I know 11% is the floor, but is there a level where – you think that it just starts to get excessive and even regardless of the change in ratings, it starts to make sense to turn on the buyback if you're still being measured with... As we climb above 11, I think it introduces optionality.
spk16: You can build capital and then that could be part of an M&A transaction. There could be multiple things that one could be done with it. But again, we're not there right now. And we're, again, cleaning up kind of the last few things that we want to change on our balance sheet. And by the summertime, I think we'll be there in terms of the profile we're looking for for liquidity.
spk07: And lastly, on deposits, can you share how much of the interest-bearing deposits are indexed? to a rate as opposed to having some level of discretion at the bank in terms of pricing?
spk16: Well, you know, I mean, so, I mean, if you look at our interest-bearing deposit cost, you know, you can see that that is not as large as, you know, a component relative to, you know, kind of some of these, you know, ECR elements we've been talking about. There's some that is a little bit higher beta, but it is less significant than on the ECR piece.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Tim Brazlia of Wells Fargo. The line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk08: Oh, sorry, Timur, your line is now open. Please go ahead.
spk01: Timur has disconnected at this time. We currently have no further questions. So I'll hand back to Ken Vecchione for any further remarks.
spk03: Well, thank you very much for joining us today. We look forward to talking to you about 2024 in a couple months from now. Thanks again.
spk01: Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer