This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Good day and welcome to the Essential Utilities Incorporates Quarter 2 2022 earnings call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Brian. Please go ahead, sir.
spk14: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's conference call. I am Brian Dingardus, Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasurer at Essential. If you did not receive a copy of the press release, you can find it by visiting the Investor Relations section of our website at essential.co. The slides that we will be referencing and the webcast of this event can also be found at that website. Here is our forward-looking statement. As a reminder, some of the matters discussed during this call may include forward-looking statements that involve risk, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Please refer to our most recent 10Q, 10K, and other SEC filings for a description of such risk and uncertainties. During the course of this call, reference may be made to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures is included in the presentation and also posted in the Investor Relations section of the company's website. Here is our agenda for today. We'll start with Chris Franklin, our Chairman and CEO, who will discuss the highlights from the quarter and provide a company update. Next, Dan Shuler, our CFO, will discuss our financial results. Following Dan, Matt Rhodes, our EVP of strategy and corporate development, will provide an update on our acquisition program. Lastly, Chris will conclude the presentation with a summary of our guidance before opening the call up for questions. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Chris Franklin.
spk06: Hey, thanks, Brian, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. As Brian said, let's start off with some highlights of the quarter. First, we reported year-to-date net income growth of 6.5%. and our quarterly earnings per share were in line with expectations. And Dan will take you through that in a little bit more detail in a moment. We continue to enhance shareholder value as the board approved the 7% increase in the quarterly dividend this week, marking the 31st consecutive year of dividend increases, something we're very proud of. We currently have asset purchase agreements signed for seven municipal acquisitions, totaling more than $418 million in purchase price. And each of those continue toward regulatory approval and closing. Now we shared some pretty exciting news just a couple of weeks ago, that after a lengthy bid process by the Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority, we were selected by the authority board to engage in exclusive negotiations to purchase their substantial wastewater assets. And Matt's going to take you through that in a little more detail as well in just a few moments. Now, as part of the company's ongoing commitment to the renewal of critical infrastructure, we invested approximately $424 million, $424.6 million to be exact, throughout our water, wastewater, and natural gas systems in the first half of the year. This compared to $404.6 million from the same period last year. And I'm going to give you a little sense of those projects that we undertook in the quarter in just a few minutes. Now lastly, we remain on track to achieve our ESG targets and our commitments to ESG as well. You can read more about our progress in our 2021 ESG reporting update that was just posted this week. For those of you who follow ESG metrics closely, those updates can be found on our ESG microsite. Now, when we talk about investing a billion dollars in infrastructure each year, it often goes unrecognized that to achieve this level of spending, we have to plan, execute, and account for thousands of projects each year. And this is different from a lot of large utilities. You know, think about the electric utility industry, where they have a very few but very large high-dollar projects that make up their capital budget. So I want to provide a few examples of the work that our operations team has accomplished already this year. Execution of a vast number of projects in a large capital plan has become one of our core competencies at the company. Investing in our infrastructure is key not only to our company's growth, but critical to protecting our environment and ensuring reliability of service. Now, starting on the water side, in Pennsylvania, we're working on the Valley Forge National Park Transmission Main Replacement Project. This consists of installing a large, 9,100 linear feet, 30-inch transmission main to replace an existing 98-year-old cast iron main. This main helps convey water from one of our largest plants, the Pickering Water Treatment Plant, to roughly 670,000 people. And it's being completed in coordination with all of the services you might imagine, the National Park Service, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, local townships, and other utilities. all to ensure that we have minimal disturbance to this really historic area for our country. This $4.4 million project is expected to be completed in 2023. Now in Ohio, we completed the Ashtabula Water Treatment Plant upgrades. which includes the first plate settler water treatment plant process in our Ohio fleet. This allows us to use a smaller footprint to process even more water, obviously making it much more efficient. We also added new flocculation and renovation improvements to our existing conventional filters. Our filter improvements include automation of valves, which is also much more efficient. This $14 million project has yielded improved settled water quality at the front end of the plant, which ultimately yields in savings in power and chemicals, along with improved water quality, just bringing overall efficiency through reduction in O&M costs. A really good, strong project. And finally, in Illinois, We're making significant upgrades to our Kankakee water treatment plant. These are largely compliance-driven updates to meet federal requirements, specifically the cryptosporidium compliance. Ultraviolet disinfection was our selected method. and we believe that's the optimal treatment process for this situation. The design includes three parallel UV reactor trains with a capacity of 24 million gallons a day. We also made accommodations for future upgrades that could actually increase our plant to about 36 million gallons a day. The project includes four intermediate pumps to accommodate the hydraulic profile requirements of this new UV treatment process. Construction is already underway, and upgrades are planned to be online by December of this year. Additional water treatment plant improvements also include filter upgrades and some upgrades to our backwash pump, but this is also a really strong upgrade to our plant there in Illinois. Now these details might not necessarily be important to you, but this is really important work that our people are executing, and it continues to build the reputation that's so important as we talk to municipalities who are considering a sale of their assets. Because we know that our expertise, our compliance record, and our overall execution act as our resume as we continue to work to grow our company. So now on the gas side, there are a couple of examples that I'd like to highlight as well in the Pittsburgh area. Now the Fern Hollow Bridge project in the Squirrel Hill area of the city is a $5.5 million project that not only includes replacing the pipeline that was severed, and you may remember this from the last winter, when the bridge collapsed in January. but also includes replacing an additional 3,800 feet of 1927 vintage cast iron pipe on each side of the bridge. You might recall this was national news. President Biden was visiting the collapse shortly after it happened. He just happened to be in Pittsburgh that day. And the project is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of this year, which is a pretty big, pretty fast timeline given what we experienced out there. Now, another project, the Fort Pitt Boulevard project in downtown Pittsburgh, and for those of you who know Pittsburgh, this would be in the Golden Triangle area. This is a $3.5 million project installing about 2,210 feet of 16-inch coated steel pipe replacing 1936 and 1939 vintage 16-inch bare steel pipe. This project will also be completed this calendar year. Now, these projects improve the reliability of service, they reduce risk, and they reduce emissions to the environment and obviously support our ESG commitments as well. Now, let's talk about ESG for a moment. We recognize that transparent and detailed ESG reporting is important to many of our constituencies, including many of you who are on the line today. On August 1st, we published our 2021 ESG reporting update to our microsite. For those of you who know it, it's at esg.essential.co. You'll recall last summer, we refreshed our microsite and published an expanded 2020 ESG report alongside supplemental reports that summarize key metrics. Now this year, we're updating just the supplemental reports. Then next year, we'll look to publish a new version of our full ESG report. We arrived at this reporting cadence after dialogue with many of our stakeholders, including some of you. Now, through June of this year, we're reporting strong progress on each of our major ESG announcements. These were initially announced in 2021, and it includes large jump to 14% Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reduction. Now this is driven in large part by our January 1st switch to nearly 100% renewable electric power for our water segment operations in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and New Jersey. We expect this figure to continue to rise in the right direction as the remaining six months of the year actualize. We also continue to replace aging gas main, as I just was describing, each year, which is the greatest contributor toward our targeted 60% reduction by 2035. Now, lastly, it's not on this slide, but I did want to briefly revisit what I call our industry-leading PFAS commitment, given the recent federal proposed health advisory limit. We consider our 2020 commitment a great example of strong ESG in practice. We were the first and the only multi-state utility to set its own company-wide PFAS standard And I think we're uniquely positioned to address PFAS because of our experience and our capabilities with analytical testing and building and operating treatment systems, spending nearly $40 million to meet the company-wide standard of 13 parts per trillion. You know, the EPA's recent announcement about its revised, you know, the non-enforceable health advisory limit recommends that utilities considering addressing PFOA at a level over .004 parts per trillion, which is more than 1,000 times lower than the previous advisory limit set in 2016. It's also 1,000 times lower than the technical capability to detect this contaminant, which is currently at 4 parts per trillion. So, largely, we see this as a political action by the federal EPA and not necessarily based in science. So I think we all know at this point that the EPA will be proposing a true PFAS enforceable limit in the fall of this year, which is based on the legal process and requires a cost-benefit analysis. We believe that the MCL, or maximum contaminant level, that will be issued this fall will require a much higher concentration than the health advisory level they recently announced. We have our key people from the company who are involved in organizations that we'll be reviewing and discussing this proposal with the EPA up and through the fall. So I think we're well positioned to have adequate input into this decision that the EPA will make. And with that, Dan, let me turn it over to you for the financials.
spk07: Thanks, Chris, and good morning, everyone. Let's move to slide 11. We ended the second quarter with revenues of $448.8 million, up about 13% from last year. Our regulated water segment contributed $269.4 million, and our regulated natural gas segment contributed $167.7 million, with the balance coming from our limited non-regulated operations. Purchase gas costs increased by $30.2 million due to higher natural gas commodity prices. Thus, gross margin increased year over year by $21.5 million. The largest contributors to the increase in gross margin for the quarter were additional revenues from rates and surcharges, customer growth, and increased volumes from both our water and natural gas segments. O&M expenses increased to $135 million for the quarter, up from $127.5 million in the second quarter of last year. Recently added acquisitions, increased maintenance expenses, and higher water production costs, primarily as a result of inflationary pressures, were the main drivers for the quarter. Net income was up 1.7% year over year from $80.9 million to $82.3 million, and GAAP earnings per share decreased to $0.31 from $0.32 for the quarter, given the increase in shares due to the August 2021 settlement of our 6.7 million share forward sale that we did in 2020. Next, we'll walk through the waterfall slide, starting with revenue. In the second quarter of 2022, revenues increased 51.7 million, or 13% on a GAAP basis. Similar to the first quarter of the year, you'll notice the primary driver was the recovery of higher purchase gas costs of 30.2 million, due to the significant increase in natural gas commodity prices. Rates and surcharges, organic and acquisition growth, and increased volumes from both our regulated water segment and our regulated natural gas segment provided an additional $23.7 million toward the revenue increase, which was then offset slightly by other. Next, let's look at the operations and maintenance expenses on slide 13. Looking at the operations and maintenance waterfall, expenses for the second quarter increased to $135 million compared to $127.5 million for the same period in 2021. Other expenses contributed $3.5 million for the quarter. Other reflect higher outside services costs in the water segment, some of which will be capitalized in the third quarter, offset by higher capitalization in the gas segment aligned with the accelerated pace of capital projects this year. Growth, which reflects the O&M costs of acquired systems in Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Texas, contributed $2.2 million, and increased production costs in our regulated water segment added an additional $1.5 million. In production costs, the largest inflation-related increases we are experiencing are for chemicals, many of which have seen significant increases year on year. Employee-related costs added $554,000, And the gas customer assistance program expenses, which are recoverable through a revenue surcharge, increased $524,000. These increased expenses were offset by decreased bad debt of $788,000. Next, we'll spend a minute on the earnings per share waterfall. Beginning on the left side of the slide, GAAP EPS for the second quarter of 2021 was 32 cents. Rates and surcharges contributed 3 cents, and growth and increased volume from our regulated water segment added another 2.1 cents combined. Continuing on, increased volume from our regulated natural gas segment contributed 0.6 cents. These were offset by 4.4 cents of other items, including increased depreciation, interest, and taxes, and 1.7 cents of expenses. The result is a gap EPS of 31 cents for the second quarter of 2022, which was in line with the street's expectations. As I noted earlier, the 31 cents also includes the impact of 6.7 million additional shares from the forward equity sale that we settled last August, August of 2021. These shares were thus not in the denominator when the 32 cents from the second quarter of 2021 was calculated. We remain confident in our full year guidance and our ability to deliver on the 5% to 7% earnings growth per share expectation that we set at the beginning of the year. Moving on to rate activity and other regulatory matters on slide 15. In 2022 so far, we completed rate cases or surcharge filings in our regulated water segment in Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. And we completed a rate case in a regulated natural gas segment in Kentucky. The combined total annualized revenue increase is $83.3 million. As many of you are aware, we received our final order in the litigated base rate case for a regulated water segment subsidiary in Pennsylvania. Just to recap, we filed the rate case for our Aqua Pennsylvania subsidiary in August of 2021. which included six acquisitions, as well as the request for the first water-focused universal services program in Pennsylvania. The primary driver of the rate case filing was the $1.1 billion in capital investments since the last rate case. We were awarded an ROE of 10% by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and additional authorized revenues of $69 million, with new rates effective on May 19th of 2022. And with that, I'll hand it over to Matt to discuss developments in the municipal acquisition program.
spk08: Matt? Thanks, Dan. I appreciate it. I'll start on slide 17. Many of you are familiar with the seven signed asset purchase agreements pending that are shown here in the dark blue boxes, which together add nearly 224,000 customers or customer equivalents and total over $418 million in purchase price. We are pleased to report that last month we received approval by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission for the East Whiteland and Willistown wastewater transactions, which is reflected on this slide. We anticipate closing both of those transactions over the next month. Regarding Del Cora, many of you are aware that we submitted a request to the Pennsylvania PUC earlier this year to restart the regulatory approval process after the Commonwealth Court decision on March 3, 2022. wherein the court acknowledged the enforceability of our asset purchase agreement with Delcorra. We are now currently awaiting an order from the Common Pleas Court that is consistent with the Commonwealth Court's decision. On July 14th, the Pennsylvania PUC also remanded the approval proceeding back to the administrative law judge for review in a prompt manner. The order for this was then formally entered on July 26th. Given these developments, we remain comfortable in the closing timeline we laid out earlier this year and continue to have Delcorra included in our long-term guidance starting in 2023. We expect to close the other four transactions on this slide by later this year or in the first half of 2023. Moving on to slide 18, I would like to cover the exciting development with Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority. As Chris referenced earlier, Last month, it was announced that we were selected as the sole company to move forward with discussions regarding the sale of the Authority's wastewater assets. Aqua Pennsylvania was granted a one-year exclusivity agreement based on the Authority Board's determination that our terms were the most beneficial to its customers, employees, and other constituents, along with the residents and taxpayers of Bucks County. We have not yet signed an asset purchase agreement, Therefore, it is not included in our current pending acquisition numbers, but we did want to provide you with some of the details regarding the potential acquisition. Our bid is for $1.1 billion in total for the Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority wastewater system assets, with the majority of this paid up front and the rest paid over time. The system serves approximately 75,000 customer connections and approximately 130,000 equivalent dwelling units given the 14 other wholesale wastewater contracts. There are 15 plants with a combined total capacity of about 50 million gallons per day, approximately 115 pumping stations, and the system has approximately 900 miles of sewer pipe. In addition to Bucks County, the authority also has service areas and owns assets in both Montgomery County and Chester County. This is a very, very exciting opportunity for our company, which will more than double our existing wastewater connections in Pennsylvania. We hope to have more news to share on this exciting development, including the potential signing of an asset purchase agreement in the near future. Moving on to slide 19. In addition to the signed municipal transactions and with the most recent announcements, our pipeline of opportunities for growth remains strong and healthy. The competitive amount of upfront capital we provide, along with our technical and operational expertise and long-term rate stability, continue to demonstrate our value proposition to municipal systems. We continue to focus on growth in all eight of our water and wastewater states, given we have fair market value legislation in place in each. Currently, we are engaged in active discussions with municipalities and pursuing approximately potential water and wastewater customers as illustrated in the table you see here. And I will note that this pipeline no longer includes the Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority wastewater customers. Now I'll hand it back to Chris.
spk06: Hey, thanks, Matt. I mentioned earlier in the call that when the board met this week, they declared a 7% increase to our quarterly dividend. This marks the 32nd increase in 31 years. in the 77th consecutive year of quarterly dividend payments, supporting our consistent record of delivering shareholder value. Now, following the increase, the annualized dividend rate will be nearly $1.15 per share. And this slide demonstrates the annual dividend growth that we've consistently provided for shareholders over the years. Let me wrap up on slide 22 by reaffirming our 2022 guidance. We continue to expect to earn between $1.75 and $1.80 per share. We remain confident that our three-year earnings per share growth will be 5% to 7% through 2024, and our capital plans remain on track as we anticipate investing approximately $1 billion a year to rehabilitate and strengthen water, wastewater, and natural gas systems through 2024. Rate base is expected to continue to grow between 6% to 7% for water and between 8% and 10% for natural gas. Customer growth is expected to be between 2% and 3% on average for water and stable in natural gas. And finally, we remain committed, as we've discussed, to our ESG targets and will continue to report on our progress as things develop, including a year-end report for all of you. And this concludes our formal remarks, and why don't we open the line for questions at this point.
spk01: Thank you, sir. If you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Again, press star 1 to ask a question. We will take the first question from Insu Kim from Golden SAC. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk06: Hi, Insu.
spk01: Good morning, Insu.
spk09: Guys, how are you? First question on that pending, the discussions with the Buckeye County, I guess near term we'll see if there's an APA that's signed. Looking through that, I guess the difference in, I guess the breakout of the immediate payment versus the ones over time, and thinking about potentially the percentage of those that kind of cascaded down into the rate base, any rule of thumb or initial thoughts on How would you think about that?
spk08: Yeah, I can take that one. Thanks and Sue. So really the Bucks County Water and Sew Authority Board wanted to ensure an ongoing revenue stream over time and therefore we entered into a retained capacity agreement. for a portion of its wastewater treatment capacity. Basically, as development occurs in their service territory, we'll purchase that retained capacity, and then once we purchase it, we'll be able to include it in our rate base going forward in order to service these new homes and businesses that come online. The $195 million that we referenced on the slide, it'll actually be paid out over a very long period of time. It could be in the range of 50 to 100 years, but it really all depends on the level of development in that service area.
spk09: Okay. Then in that immediate $935 million, any percentage that we could think of that ultimately goes immediately into rate base if this does happen and unclosed?
spk06: Yeah, that's going to be dependent upon, as you know, the fair market value process and the Public Utility Commission's view of things. But we feel good about our purchase price, and we think we'll make a strong case with our UBEs for inclusion and rate base. But, you know, it's hard for us to predict exactly what that will be before we run through the process.
spk09: Got it. And then I guess somewhat related to that and then from a balance sheet and financing perspective, given that this pretty large potential acquisition is out there, when we look over the next 12 months or beyond, is the larger potential equity issuance going to be tied to potentially this agreement and the acquisition or could we see something a little bit sooner?
spk07: Yeah, and so I think that's something we're still evaluating today. I mean, this is relatively new news in terms of Bucks County, and then, of course, we've got expectations around Del Cora. So we're really reevaluating how much equity you need and what the timing is for that equity and really the means of raising that equity.
spk06: Yeah, and just to add to that, Dan, We know that upon signing of the asset purchase agreement, we probably have, call it 9 to 12 months, as you all know, of regulatory process. So given we're not quite at the signing of the APA, we have plenty of time to consider timing of equity needs, as Dan said. Correct.
spk09: Okay, and just one more if I could on the balance sheet aspect. Whether it's trailing 12 months or what your expectations are for 22 from an FFO debt perspective, accounting for the future potential equity with the acquisitions, are you looking to get to at least the 13% level?
spk07: I think when we look at our FFO to debt and, you know, the conversations with both agencies have effectively had 12% as our downgrade threshold. But what has been communicated is if we were consistently below 12%, we would be having conversations with respect to that. So, you know, it's our intent as we finance transactions and as we finance our significant CapEx program to keep that FFO to debt above that 12% level. on an ongoing basis. But I wouldn't say that 13% is, you know, a near-term target for us, Insu.
spk09: Got it. That's helpful. Thanks, guys.
spk07: Thanks, Insu.
spk05: Thank you.
spk01: The next question from Dagesh Chopra from Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hey, Dagesh.
spk02: Hey, Dagesh. Hey. Good morning, Chris, Dan, and I saw the... the added responsibility for Mr. Dingerdist, and so he's never going home now. Congrats to him.
spk07: Now that we've brought him into finance, you're absolutely right.
spk02: Okay, so just congrats on the Bucks County deal. You've answered all the questions that I had there. I just wanted to just check in on the Inflation Reduction Act. Obviously, you won't qualify for from a size perspective for the alternative minimum tax. So that's not an area of concern. Anything that, uh, us and investors should be watching, uh, that impacts your business on the inflation reduction act.
spk07: No, I mean, I think that that's the primary one. That's the sort of the quickest to identify and kind of look at and say, no, we're not, we're not hitting that billion dollar threshold yet. So we wouldn't be impacted by that, that minimum tax immediately. Uh, and then, Like everybody else, I think we're still waiting through it to understand what the real impact could be, but nothing at this point is hitting the radar screen as being significant.
spk02: Got it. I just wanted to check in. And then just, you know, on pension, can you remind us what your accounting policy is as we think about 2023? Some of your electric and water utility peers use this mark-to-market accounting where they could have a significant headwind next year. Maybe just any color there, and can you remind us what your accounting policy is?
spk07: Yeah, let me give you a few points on the pension. The Aqua pension, which is the majority of the employees you think about, that pension has been frozen since 2003 to new entrants. So we have people that are in it, but they joined it before 2003. In the last few years, we started a glide path in terms of our investment allocation there. And so in that, as we've become more fully funded, we've materially reduced our exposure to equities and other risk assets. So at this point, Durgesh, we're effectively 100% funded for the bulk of our obligations, and we continue to have pension contributions as part of our rate structure. So when we think about pension, it's something that we manage, but it's not something that we worry about.
spk05: Got it. Thanks, guys. Appreciate the time. Thanks for getting it.
spk01: The next question is from Ryan Connors from North Coast Research. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hey, Ryan. Hey, Ryan. Great.
spk10: Thanks for taking me. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to talk about the M&A pipeline from a little different perspective. I want to get your thoughts on sort of the public narratives out there. Obviously, as you add larger deals to the pipeline and a major – press market like Philly, you also raise more press coverage, which tends to skew kind of locally here. And then you, you bring more of the food and water watch types, um, you know, uh, in greater numbers. And that's been apparent at some of the, some of the local, the recent coverage locally. And I'm curious, my question is, and I, we do believe that that has been a factor in some of the pushback on Del Cora funnels up to some of those leaders. Um, So what is your strategy for kind of taking control of that narrative and making sure that your side of the story gets out there? I mean, you did some great comments on this call, Chris, but this obviously isn't the forum to reach that broader audience. I mean, just curious how you can strategize around, you know, making sure you get equal play with some of the detractors there.
spk06: Yeah, a couple observations, and Matt may have some as well, but I think, number one, we have a pretty defined strategy, communication strategy, which includes, you know, we're up with microsites and websites that put full information out there. For the hearings that we had for Bucks County, we organized them much like an expo so that constituencies interested would get a full view of the company's expertise, its people, and how we perform. So it wasn't a rows of chairs and everybody throwing rocks at each other. It was a much more collaborative. I realize that that's not what our opponents want. They want a rows of chairs so that they can yell and scream. But also an observation I would make that we've seen more recently is outsiders, Food and Water Watch in this case, and to some degree other local organizers who have become professionals at this, I think are viewed and have been viewed in some of the Bucks County work as outsiders. Remember, even in this case, and I'll use this as an example, but it would apply to Chester and Delcour and others, We live here. We work here. We're part of the fabric of this community. We're not from Washington, D.C., coming up here trying to agitate. And so I think those are important factors. I'm not saying that there weren't involved constituencies who had a say, particularly in some of these, because there are. But I would say it's being led, the most active agitation is being led by outsiders. I think that's being recognized.
spk08: Yeah, look, I think we have a very compelling value proposition for municipalities. And I think municipalities see it, right? They understand everything we bring to the table. but we're not always going to be able to convince these outsiders that don't really know the whole story, right? They have a set agenda, and, you know, we're less concerned with those folks and more worried about making sure the value proposition gets to the people that need it in our communities, right?
spk06: And those outsiders are largely anti-privatization. So it's not how do I operate my wastewater or my water plant. It's really about I don't want my assets privatized. So it's a philosophy rather than an economic or a – a common sense approach. So I hope, Brian, over time that those, those win the day. But we have to take these one at a time. And as you know, we take them very seriously.
spk10: Yep. Yep. Okay. Yeah, it's great color. I wanted to ask also about, it was an interesting hearing this week on SB 597, which I guess is the water quality accountability legislation and PA. Mark and Chris did a great job there and, I wanted to see if, Chris, if you had any updated thoughts on whether that becomes law or not and what the impact of that could be for ACWA.
spk06: Yeah, we're very proud of the team who testified up there, and we try to be very thoughtful in our comments. Listen, you know, Ryan, you've studied this stuff. This is simply leveling the playing field. We can make this a cost item or however the opposition wants to portray it. But the reality is we're just asking all utilities to provide the same level of service and replacement cycles and everything else that we do under the guidance of the Public Utility Commission. And so we think it's very reasonable. You know, it's hard to read legislators in terms of how they'll react, but I think they're probably at this point in the process of digesting all of that information and testimony, and I think we'll get a much better read on the options for proceeding through the committee and then to the floor of the House as we did in the Senate in the coming weeks when the legislature comes back into session in September. But, listen, I think it's important legislation, and we're going to continue to press hard. But, ultimately, it will be up to the committee chairman and legislators.
spk10: Yep. Okay. And then, lastly, this is more housekeeping. But, Dan, and apologies if you mentioned this. I might have missed it. But the tax rate did kind of jump, and kind of one of the higher ones we've seen in a few years. So is that – is this – any forward – you know, guidance for us or on what we expect now in the tax line?
spk07: Yeah. So Ryan, I would look for full year 2022 to be just below zero, meaning a little bit of a benefit on the tax line. And, and as you, as you know, kind of at this point, you know, we're getting tax benefit on the people's side because of where we are in terms of repair cycle and We have a normal provision, if you will, on the water side, and you blend these two together. So I think it's an interesting quarter tax-wise when you look at it, but I think also look year-to-date, but think a slight negative effective tax rate or think of it as a benefit for full year 2022.
spk10: Got it. Okay. Hey, great. Thanks for your time.
spk03: Yeah, thanks, Ryan.
spk01: The next question from Travis Miller from Morningstar. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk12: Hi, Travis.
spk07: Hi, Travis.
spk12: Hi. First question was thinking about customer bills. I think you have a unique perspective in that you have the gas side and the water side. How are you seeing the trajectory, especially on the commodity side, between the gas bills and water bills? Obviously, gas prices being high. How is that going to affect the winter? And then what are you seeing in terms of water bills relative to what we've been seeing on gas bills?
spk06: Let's start with water. Clearly, we don't have the same kind of commodity or fuel charge that we have in natural gas, so the commodity is relatively inexpensive. The cost really associated with that is the pipe to get there and our replacement projects, along with the enhancements of our plants, as we talked about with PFAS, PFOA. clearly the trajectory is going higher. What we've tried to do in this inflationary period is contain cost as best we can, right? So we're continue to focus on capital projects that reduce operating expense. And so on the water side, the cost increases or rate increases, if you will, are largely based on capital investment and you know, some now on inflation, but we're working very hard to mitigate some of those. On gas, obviously, the commodity cost is up. Now, there's been some moderation as we put about 49% of our gas in the ground during the summer that we'll ultimately use in the wintertime. So we try to take advantage of that as best we can. But clearly, when we look at it on a year-over-year basis, natural gas is much higher this year than it was last. And so therefore, the winter bills our customers will see in the winter coming up will be higher based on that commodity cost than they were last year. Dan, you want to put more color on that?
spk07: Yeah, real quick, Chris, I guess. You know, I think of it as our customers tend to use kind of 90 MCF a year, maybe 100. So in rough numbers, You know, think about for each dollar in the increase of the commodity cost, the bill would increase by $90 to $100. So if we're at, guess, it's $2 more per year this year, you can think about it as the annual bill being maybe $200 more in 2022-2023 heating season than we saw last year. Yeah. Now, Travis...
spk06: We have significant safety nets in place, right? Not only the federal LIHEAP dollars for natural gas and LIWAP dollars on the water side, but we also have CAP programs or customer assistance programs. And on the gas side, you know, call that in the range of $35 million a year. And on the water side, it's growing because we just put the universal service program in with the last rate case that was finalized in May of this year or so. It's not as significant as natural gas, but we are working hard to make sure that the safety net is there for folks who really have a hard time paying their bills.
spk12: Okay. Got it. Makes sense. And then if we go back to the comments you made earlier on the EPA federal regulations, would you classify that more as a capital investment opportunity, or is there some risk there that that could increase O&M costs that you might not get? recovery of?
spk06: We'd expect full recovery of all investments to comply with federal law, and so we don't think there's any exposure there. I will say that, you know, when we talked about our initial commitments, when we put the 13 parts per trillion standard in against an HAL health advisory level of 70 parts, We did take some level of risk that some of that wouldn't be recovered because it was in some ways exceeding federal law. But the discussion with regulators has been very, very positive. And so far there have been no regulators who thought we should not recover those capital expenses. We'll see where the maximum contaminant level comes in this fall, and if that should drop our standard from call it 13 to 10 or less, we would of course move immediately to comply with that federal law like everybody else would be, but we would expect full recovery. We also expect that that could open up some opportunities for us to help other municipals who may not be able to afford it or don't have the expertise that we have in meeting those compliance rules. Okay.
spk12: Got it. I appreciate the thoughts there. That's all I had. Yep. Thank you.
spk01: Thanks, Travis. The next question from Ryan Greenwald from Bank of America. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hey, Ryan. Hey, Ryan. Hey, guys. Good morning. Good morning.
spk04: Brian, congratulations on the new role. Thank you. Maybe just to follow up on equity. So I think you guys have talked about potential for a $500 million ATM. Is that still kind of in the cards in the near term, or is that on pause right now, kind of pending firmer developments on Bucks and maybe some other moving pieces?
spk07: Yeah, it's really the latter of those. I think given the recent progress on Bucks and as we think about Delcora, the exact timing and format and quantum of the equity rate is, is still in flux.
spk04: Got it. And then any initial expectations on benefits that could accrue to you guys from the recent move by the governor to reduce the tax rate in Pennsylvania and how that could kind of factor into any rate case dynamics here?
spk07: Yeah, actually in, in Pennsylvania we have, um, It's called STAS, but it's really a process by which as their state tax rate changes, those result in an adjustment to the rates that our customers charge. So, as the corporate rate comes down, we'll be passing those benefits back to our customers.
spk05: Understood.
spk04: And then, any updated thoughts just in terms of Chester?
spk06: Yeah, so we continue to move through the legal process. You know the case is still at the Supreme Court, and they have not yet ruled. You know, the receiver continues his work. We expect him to wrap up actually next year. In the meantime, there will be a board member change. Every five years, the board of the Chester Water Authority comes up for renewal, we expect that there will be at least three new members of that board. And so they're up, call it August 15th or in that range. And so we'll see what the new board has an appetite for. And I think we'll watch to see those developments. But other than that, I think it's on the course to wait for the court hearings.
spk04: Great. I'll leave it there. Thanks so much.
spk03: Take care, Ryan.
spk01: Next question from Jonathan Reeder from Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk06: Hey, Jonathan.
spk13: Hey, good morning, team. How are you guys? How are you, Chris? Well, good, Jonathan. Good, good. So on Del Cora, besides the commission voting to restart the process and kicking it back to the ALJ, have there been any other developments like has a timeframe for getting a new proposed decision been outlined?
spk06: Well, you know, the ALJ has asked for the preliminary hearing, which I think is in the next week here on Tuesday. And so we expect that that schedule would come as a result of that hearing. So I would say in the next week or so we'll know what that schedule looks like. And we hope that... the ALJ would adhere to the commission's desire to move swiftly, promptly, as they said.
spk13: Okay. And then can you remind us, I know you said you're comfortable, kind of your assumptions around double core and closing. Can you remind us what is assumed in your guidance as it relates to, you know, kind of the timing of the close? I'm assuming it's the current purchase price that you guys assume, stuff like that. Just run through that stuff again.
spk07: Yeah, so what we have included in our guidance would be full year 2023. We'd have Del Cora included in our numbers. And if you do kind of simple rate-based math on the purchase price, you'll get pretty close to the net income assumption there.
spk13: Okay, so you're kind of assuming year-end 2022 close and then the $277 million purchase price. Correct. Got you. And then, Dan, if you laugh in terms of, like, O&M expense, you know, it looks like it did kind of normalize a bit in Q2 after, you know, the Q1 abnormalities. Did you say, you know, some of the stuff in that kind of other bucket that had the $3.5 million increase this quarter will reverse or be capitalized in the back half of 22?
spk07: Yeah, that's correct. We identified some things after the quarter close that were outside services expenses, which should be capitalized, so we'll turn those around in the third quarter.
spk13: Okay, so I think it was around like close to 6% increase this quarter. We should actually be thinking kind of lower than that based on those reversals.
spk07: Yeah, take the 5.9% that you see. I'd remove the impact of the acquired systems from that and then the impact of the customer assistance program for gas because that just floats based on on gas price, and there's a revenue offset to it, and you'd come down to an increase of about 3.7%, then if you take into account these reversals, it would bring that number to a more moderate level. Okay. Okay.
spk13: So, inflation, as of now, you have it kind of under control of the impacts?
spk07: I would say yes, but those inflation impacts are certainly out there, and so related to both capital and expense.
spk06: Okay. Jonathan, just think about fuel, right? As one chemical to another.
spk07: As we said, I think we mentioned chemicals in the prepared remarks, but certain things like chlorine have effectively doubled in price. Now, it's small volume, small part of our cost structure, but some significant increases are out there.
spk13: Yeah. Okay, well, great. Good luck in the upcoming months in terms of Delcora and getting bucks signed, sealed, and delivered.
spk06: Thanks very much. Thanks, Jonathan. We're working hard at it.
spk01: Again, press star 1 to ask a question. We will take the next question from Greg Oriel from UBS. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hey, Greg.
spk11: Hey, thank you. So on Bucks County, when would you see that being accreted to earnings and how would that ramp up with fair value accounting?
spk06: Well, I think a couple of ways to think about that. One, we have an asset purchase agreement that we have signed, right, that they have not yet signed. So it depends. I think it could be tweaked before it's signed, so we're not entirely clear. Secondly, it'll be accretive certainly in rates, but I don't think we're ready to say what that accretion looks like before we put it in rates, like so many of these. And then depending on the period of time it takes for us actually to get an assigned APA, hopefully that's sooner than later, that time period between now and when we file our next case also could be longer or shorter. So I think there's a lot of considerations to that, but certainly as we look at this, The long-term accretion is positive. It's a matter of getting it to rates initially.
spk05: Okay. Thank you.
spk01: We have a follow-up question from Insukim. Your line is open. Go ahead.
spk09: Hey, thanks for taking one more question from me. I might ask this a little bit cautiously. I guess in the utility industry, I think over the past year, there have been maybe a couple of utilities that when they had the financing needs through equity have sold at least just a portion of one of the utility jurisdictions or assets that they may have. I know we've discussed the strategy about water and gas and whatnot. Now that Bucks and potentially a couple of other chunkier acquisitions may be in the front window, is there any consideration or thought that maybe a partial sale of the gas utility ownership may be on the table to finance the equity portion?
spk06: It's a good question, and I'll reiterate. you know, where we've been, and that is that, you know, we really like these gas assets. They're outperforming all of our expectations, earnings, safety, capital program, and everything else. And so we're really comfortable. Having said that, you know, you make an important point, and, you know, we think about, you know, all of our options. And so as we think about whether Bucks becomes real, whether we can get Delcor closed in the next quarter here, there's a lot to think about. So I would say we're evaluating all of our thoughts on capital raise at this point. Matt, do you have any thoughts?
spk08: No, I think you said it correctly, Chris.
spk09: Okay, so a lot of different options on the table. Got it. Thanks a lot.
spk01: Next question from Verity Mitchell from HSBC. The line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, Verity.
spk00: Morning, everybody. Hey, Verity. Hi, and congratulations to Brian on the new role. Fantastic. I just wanted to comment on your ESG report. You've done a huge amount of work, which I've been ploughing through. This is a question for Chris, and you might not thank me for this, but Just kind of blue sky, how do you think the risks are changing? Would you say the risks are changing more in gas rather than water, and are they growing? How do you think about the environmental risks of the two businesses? Thank you.
spk06: Yeah, I mean, it's a good question, Verity. I think just on the surface, I would just say the water business is clearly, by its nature, a much more environmentally friendly business. Having said that, and I just say that because natural gas is a fossil fuel and folks have strong opinions on fossil fuel. But having said that, when I think about the decarbonization occurring not only in the United States but around the world, natural gas has been the critical component of that decarbonization. Yes, we've added renewals at a faster pace than most could imagine. The question is, what is that ultimate energy mix down the road, many years down the road? And I would suggest to you that natural gas will continue to play a significant role for 30 or 40 years. Maybe the technology advances and things like carbon capture and hydrogen play larger roles, but natural gas in places that get cold in particular will continue to play an important role in the energy mix. Now, I think, as I just mentioned, the technology advances could mitigate risks. The replacement of pipe and the tightening of our systems to reduce methane, stray methane, are important aspects, and we're, as you know, fully engaged in that. But if you just simply said, how do we think about the work around ESG and the environment and our two businesses, clearly an elevated focus in natural gas.
spk05: Right, thanks. Very helpful. You're welcome.
spk01: That's all the time we have for questions. Mr. Chris, at this time, I will turn the conference back to you for any additional or closing remarks.
spk06: Thanks so much. Obviously, folks will be available for follow-up questions. Brian, Dan, myself, Matt, all available and at your disposal. Have a great day. Thanks for joining us.
spk01: This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer