This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

L'Air Liquide Ord
2/20/2026
Good morning, everyone. This is Aude Rodriguez, Head of Investor Relations. Thank you very much for attending the call today. Francois Jacob and Jérôme Pelton will present the performance of the full year 2025. For the Q&A session, they will be joined by Émilie Morem-Renoir and Adam Peters, both GroupGP, overseeing respectively EMEA and North America. Adam is on the phone with us from the U.S. In the agenda, our next announcement is on April 28th for our first quarter revenue.
Let me now send you over to Francois. Thank you, Aude, and good morning to all of you.
It is a real pleasure to be with you today for this earnings call. This past year, Eliteed has reached new heights in both operational excellence and financial performance. The inherent strengths of our operating model, coupled with the transformation momentum driven by our teams, has delivered robust performance across all key metrics. This is particularly significant given the ongoing microeconomic and geopolitical headwinds. Let's look at the specifics. Sales grew plus 2% on a comparable basis. This proves our ability to capture growth even in a complex environment. Our focus on operating discipline is delivering clear results. It reflects more and more the visible contribution of the transformation momentum throughout the organization. We achieved a record gas and services OIR margin improvement of 130 base points, excluding energy pathways. At the group level, the 100-base point improvement keeps us firmly on track to meet our 2026 commitment of plus 460 base points in five years. This operational leverage translated directly to the bottom line, with recurring net profit growing by plus 10%, excluding currency impact. Our recurring ROCE continues to rise above 11%. Sustaining this momentum while simultaneously scaling up our investments is a testament to our disciplined capital allocation and, of course, improved performance. Our ability to generate cash has again improved. Cash flow is growing at plus 8%, excluding currency impacts, providing us with significant strategic flexibility. Our performance is equally strong on extra financial fronts. We achieved record safety levels. We also further decoupled growth from carbon with CO2 emissions now 13% below our 2020 baseline and the carbon intensity being reduced by 46% in 10 years. Finally, our investment backlog remained at a record high of nearly 5 billion euros in spite of the exit of the ExxonMobil Payton project. This is more than 15% above last year. These are committed, signed projects already under construction, effectively locking in our future growth. Our investment portfolio of 12-month opportunities is also at a record high level of 4.6 billion euros. As these results demonstrate, Air Liquide is steadfast not only in delivering profitable growth regardless of the macroeconomic conditions, but also preparing for the next phase of growth. This is the structural strength of the group. 2025 marks the end of the four-year strategic advance plan. You see on slide four that we have successfully delivered on all three objectives of our advanced strategy plan. Growth, first, with over 6% average annual sales growth on a comparable basis versus 2021, we have exceeded our midterm ambitions. Returns, our recurring ROCE has remained consistently above 10% since 2022, hitting this target a full year ahead of schedule. Decarbonization, finally, with three consecutive years of absolute CO2 emissions reduction, our emissions are now 13% below 2020 level. We have officially reached the infection point we projected for 2025. In summary, The advanced plan has met its objective across all horizons. In the current, versatile environment, this track record demonstrates our ability to deliver consistent results. It is the foundation upon which we build our next chapter with confidence.
On slide 5, you see one of the reasons to be confident.
The acceleration in margin improvement you see here is a direct result of our evolving culture of operational excellence. Looking at the graph, the progression is clear. We shift gears during 27, 2021 period, stepping up our performance to plus 240 basis points versus 50 basis points in the previous five years. Under the advanced plan, we have accelerated once again. With the national 100 base points delivered in 2025, we are now fully on track to reach our record high target of plus 460 basis points by the end of 2026. This momentum proves our ability to structurally enhance our profitability year after year.
And there is more to come.
And the reason why there is more to come is that our margin extension is underpinned by the structural transformation program we launched in mid-2024. In 2025, we shift from design to full-scale execution, leveraging data and AI to drive structural efficiencies. Here are some examples across each of our four pillars. First, streamlining the organization. We have simplified our structure, reducing by up to three management layers. In the past 18 months, we have reduced our global headcount by 5%. This is without taking into account the new restructuring projects announced in 17 European countries this past December. These will secure mid-term synergies as they are fully implemented. Second, industrial excellence. Our new performance management system is now 100% deployed, creating a unified global standard for operation benchmarking. It is designed to continuously boost our performance across more than 400 industrial sites and covering the full value chain. Another example is our end-to-end optimization for liquid gases, which is already rolled out at 45%, significantly reducing our industrial and supply chain costs. Third, global business services, GVS. We have eliminated subcritical smaller GVS and expanded our reach with a fourth state-of-the-art GBS center located in India. GBS headcount has grown by plus 35% as we migrate TAT from local operations to specialized hubs. We have now secured 25% of our targeted savings from this initiative. As you see, there is more to come. Finally, commercial initiatives. customer care through AI-driven automation. Five major projects are now in the rollout phase, including the AI-powered, streamlined processing of over 17,000 daily customer emails and orders in Europe and in the US. This transformation program is still in its early stages, but the momentum is clear. Leveraging our customer-centric and employee engagement culture, we are building a leaner, more disciplined, more standardized, more data-driven, and more agile ADT. On slide seven, as a matter of fact, I want to highlight the strengths of our human and social commitments, which are the foundations of our long-term success. Safety excellence. We achieved the lowest lost time accident frequency rate in our history. It represents a 60% reduction over just two years. While I am personally proud of this progress by our teams, safety remains an absolute priority and our ambition remains unchanged, zero accidents. Social impact. Under the Advance Plan, we have reached several key milestones in our social commitment. We have significantly increased the representation of women in management, leading the industry by far. I am also pleased to announce the full deployment of our common social care coverage across every country where we operate. Finally, community engagement. we have successfully scaled our global program to support local communities, ensuring our growth creates a positive impact wherever we are present. These achievements are the tangible evidence of Air Liquids' commitment to combining financial performance with a positive impact.
All-weather growth is a unique strength of Air Liquids.
Moving to slide eight, we have clear evidence of our four growth engines in action, delivering both immediate and long-term value. First, asset optimization. We continue to unlock low capex growth by leveraging our existing pipeline networks and infrastructure. This allows us to secure new sales with minimal investment. Then, core business leadership. Our technological age remains a major differentiator. As such, in 2025, we secure several long-term contracts in electronics across Asia and the US, alongside a landmark project in Europe. Then, energy and industry transition. The industry transformation, which implies carbon reduction, but also electrification and automation, is ongoing. It is a long-term trend shaping the manufacturing industry for years to come. Here, we are solidifying our leading position in many ways, being at the forefront of our customers' needs. Key milestone this year includes the signing of a second 200 megawatt electrolyzer in Europe and the electrification of two air separation units in China. Then, of course, strategic acquisitions. Beyond the targeted 13 bolt-on to increase local density, we reached a major milestone in 2025 with the acquisition of DIG Airgas in South Korea. This is highly strategic. providing us with a leading position in the world's fourth largest industrial gas market, a market expected to double over the next decade. In summary, while the first three engines fuel our growth by 5 million of investment backlog, The addition of the DIG acquisition and our Bolton strategy brings our total capital deployment to nearly 8 billion euros. Every euro of this is dedicated to securing future growth with return on investment remaining our absolute priority. Turning to slide nine, let's look at the exceptional positive momentum in our electronics business. This is a key structural growth driver where Air Liquide is uniquely positioned. Over the past 24 months, we have converted demand into a record 1 billion in capex through new projects signed worldwide, accretive and margin. But the pipeline ahead is even more significant. We are currently tracking 2 billion in active opportunities targeted for signature in the upcoming year. To give you a sense of scale, electronics now accounts for over 40% of our 12-month investment opportunities, with a heavy concentration in the high-growth markets of Asia and the US. These recent wins powered by our leading-edge technologies, do more than just grow the business. They firmly reinforce our position as the global number one in electronics. On slide 10, we are committed to converting this increased performance and growth pipeline into value for our shareholders. These are not just words. Supported by our board of directors, we will propose to increase the dividend to 3.7 euros per share at the next General Assembly. This represents a significant increase of 12% compared to last year. It continues our long-term track record of almost 8% average annual growth in dividend per share over the last 20 years. with a clear acceleration over the past three years, reaching almost 40% increase. In addition, the Board has decided to propose to proceed with the 1 for 10 free share attribution in June 2026, subject to the authorization, of course, of the next General Assembly. These new shares will be eligible for dividends starting in 2027, further compounding shareholders' returns. This balanced approach has delivered an average total shareholder return of 11% per year over the last two decades. Our resilient model and our focus on performance continue to turn operational success into sustainable return for shareholders. Turning to slide 11, let's review our outlook. On the left, You will find our formal guidance for 2026, which remained centered on our commitment to performance. For 2026, we reiterate our objective of delivering an additional plus 100 basis points of margin improvement. In addition, to provide you with greater visibility into our long-term trajectory, we have decided to further raise and extend our modern ambition. This extension through 2027 implies an additional 100 basis points of improvement for the 2027 fiscal year. With this, we are now increasing our total target to 560 basis points over a six-year period. By expanding our ambition today, we are demonstrating our strong confidence in our ability to drive further performance. This is a clear commitment to delivering sustainable, long-term profitable growth and value for our stakeholders. We look forward to hosting a Capital Market Day in the second half of this year, where we will outline our strategy roadmap and long-term financial ambitions. Thank you very much for your attention. I now ask Jérôme to drive you through the details of our financial performance. Jérôme? Thank you, François. Good morning, everyone. I will now review our numbers in more detail. So, coming back to the full year, I'm now on page 13. Group cells deliver sustained resilient growth in a still uncertain environment. Energy pass-through turned into a slight tailwind, and there was no significant scope effect in 2025. EIG being closed in January 2026. So, overall, gas and services sales achieved a plus 2% comparable increase, as did our newly consolidated engineering and technologies activity. Thus, overall, group sales were also up plus 2% on the comp basis for the year, with a slight uptick for Q4 at plus 2.5%. So zooming into Q4 2025 on slide 14, all business lines as well as all geographies delivered sales growth. Let us now review the Q4 activity for each of our main geographies. I am now on page 16. So sales in the Americas remained strong, up plus 5% on the com basis. Large industries were strong and benefited from additional hydrogen volume in the U.S. as well as solid air gases and cogest. In Merchant, sales were driven by an improved pricing effect of plus 5 to 2%, supported by active pricing management at Ergaz. Volumes were resilient with regard to Gazi, while hardwood remained soft. Growth in healthcare was very strong even by sustained high pricing in the U.S., including U.S. proximity care and our Intel or Intelioq, sorry, cylinder deployment. Growth was further supported by the increase of home health care patients in LATAM, together with solid pricing. Finally, in electronics, the very strong growth in carrier gadgets for new project start-ups as Rampus was offset by I-2024 bays in equipment and installation. Overall sales in EMEA were up plus 1%, with continued very solid growth in health care. Large industry was flat. solid air gases in Italy and South Africa and a favorable mirror effect from a customer turnaround in Q4-24 in Saudi Arabia offset low hydrogen and cogen cells, especially in Benelux. Immersion underlying cells were resilient, excluding transfer activity from GM&T. Pricing was positive at 0.8% despite the impact of the indexation on decreasing energy prices in bulk contract and low pricing in helium. Finally, health care growth was robust at plus 4.3%. Cells have been supported by strong home health care activity, notably in diabetes, community care in Germany, and sleep apnea. Mixed Asia positive-positive growth in Q4. In large industry, low demand offset positive contribution from startups and bumpers in China and Korea. Cells in Martian were flat. China positive growth despite helium headwinds. sales in the rest of Asia were somewhat mixed, but mostly low. Electronic sales improved by plus 5%. Growth in carrier gas came mainly from startup and ramp-up, in particular in Taiwan. And strong growth in materials were only partly offset by the equipment and installation comparison to a very high level in 2024. I will now comment on our Q4 activities by business line on page 16. In merchant, we saw increased pricing at plus 3.2% in Q4, so overall volume were resilient in a subdued industrial environment. Large industry benefited from startup contribution, mainly in America and Asia, and from a solid base activity in the Americas. EMEA and Asia saw overall low demand. Page 17 now. There was a strong underlying momentum in electronics, plus 6% excluding ENI. Cells benefiting from a strong contribution from carrier gas mainly start up and ramp up, in particular in Taiwan and in the U.S., as well as solid materials performance in Korea and Taiwan. This growth was tempered as ENI cells normalized following a record year in 2024. Finally, NETSCARE was to pursue strong trends despite a high comparable in 2024. Home health care was again robust, supported by diabetes, sleep apnea, and community care. In medical gases, sales were strong, steady pricing, addressing inflation, especially in the Americas. On page 18 now, as François mentioned, the success of our structural transformation program has been again demonstrated by our improved operating margin, Results were even more impressive regarding gas and services oil margin, which improved by plus 130 bits. Getting to the details, purchase were down minus 3.6%, though stable, excluding the currency impact and the reclassification effect. And the increase in energy price, particularly natural gas, was offset by the decrease in purchase of material and equipment due to a decline in sales . Personal expense were down minus 1.5% and showed a limited increase of plus 1.5% excluding the currency back. In an inflationary environment, they benefited from the reduction in net count of around minus 5% since the beginning of 2024, supported by the rationalization plans across all geographies. Depreciation is aligned with the level of startup and drop-off. as relative in group of energy margin improvement at plus 100 bits, excluding the impact of the energy pass-through. On page 19 now, this margin improvement was supported by a structured execution plan based on the three pillars. First, industrial merchant pricing remains solid, with adapting to inflationary pressure in the American and to lower energy costs in Europe. We have and we will continue to focus on price management above the cost curve. We have also executed a record level of efficiencies, delivering 631 million euros in 2025, which is significantly above our yearly advance objective of 400 million euros. Thirdly, we're active in portfolio management. We closed in the 13 acquisition in 2025 and executed three divestiture with a continued focus on strategic, profitable, and margin-accretive opportunities. Let us now review quickly the bottom of the P&L. I'm now on page 20. Operating income recurring increase plus 3.5% as published, excluding the currency impact, it goes by plus 7.7 per person, which is significantly higher than comparable sales growth, highlighting the strong leverage effect. Non-recurring operating income and expense become for 300 million euros, including restructuring costs for approximately 200 million euros with the main parts in Europe. Net financial costs were down slightly with a decrease in average debt outstanding, And in factoring, the cost of debt now stands at 3.3%, slightly down from 3.4% in 2024. The income tax rate was at 25.2%, and compared with 2024, impacted by an exceptional stock tax surcharge in France in 2025. Net profit growth was up 6.4%, and recurring net profit excluding FX increased significantly by around 10%. I am now on page 21. We generated a record 6.8 billion euros in cash in 2025. As you can see, our strong cash flow finance increased capex at 4.1 billion euro growth value, our 3.7 billion euro net of asset divestiture, as well as 1.9 billion euro in dividends, which represents another record level for us. We're also able to reduce net debt. while net debt to equity ratios stood at 31.2%, highlighting the strength of the cash flow. Keep in mind now that this ratio will increase by more than 10% each month with the DIG acquisition, which closed early 2026. On page 22, you can see that recurring ROC continues to ramp up, well above our 10% acceptance objective, and this despite continued large investments to fuel our long-term growth. On page 23, although the DIG acquisition closed in January 26, in order to give you a complete picture with regards to the full project development, I will present a 12-month portfolio of opportunities and backlog, including the opportunities and side projects acquired with DIG Airgas. So, industry and financial decisions for the year will be at a high level of €2 billion. The strategic financial decision of DIG Airgas will appear with our Q1 2026 decisions. Our investment backlog now remains very strong at 4.9 billion euros, which is now the fourth year in a row above 4 billion. The backlog is very much and well diversified, including more than 70 projects across all geographies, with approximately 40% of the backlog now being dedicated to electronics projects. Finally, our 12-month portfolio opportunity is at a record high, 4.6 billion euros, The removal of the Exxon-Beytan project is now compensated by the entry of new projects in electronics and large industries, as well as opportunities from the Aegean. The current 12-month portfolio now consists of more than 40% projects in electronics. And bear in mind that the portfolio beyond 12 months may remain dynamic and totals above 10 billion euros. On page 24, as mentioned by Francois for 2026, was strongly aligned with our ambition to improve operating margin by plus 100 bits and confident in our ability to deliver recurring net profit growth at constant exchange rate. We now commit to further expansion for OIR margin improvement in 2027 to reach plus 560 bits of cumulative improvement over six years, 2022, 2027. Thank you for your attention. Back to you, Francois. Thank you very much, Jerome. I believe we can start the Q&A.
Thank you. Dear participants, as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone keypad and wait for a name to be announced. If you withdraw a question, please press star 11 again. Please compile the Q&A. It will take a few moments.
And now we're going to take our first question now. And the question comes from . Your line is open.
Please ask a question.
Hello. Thank you for taking my questions and congratulations for the 25 results. The first question is about the organic growth. In the fourth quarter, we saw some acceleration of 2.5 from the previous quarter. How you are starting this beginning of the year, if you can give us some indication of the level of activity in the beginning of the first quarter? And the second question is about the remuneration. There's a whole distribution. You increased double-digit the dividends for 26. My question is about your considerations or your thoughts about the buybacks, you know? At the end of the day, the level of leverage is still low, looking at the opportunities you probably have room to fund these acquisitions through the balance sheet. If you can elaborate on the why to increase double-digit dividends instead of considering buybacks instead. Thank you.
Good morning, and thank you very much for your questions. I will take the first one, and Jerome will comment on the second point. Indeed, I mean, we have seen a pickup in the activity at the end of the year. This being said, I think in the current environment, we believe that we will be probably, and that's the main assumption, in the same kind of trend for 2026. So this means probably a soft growth. But if we just look back a little bit, we tend to see a more positive sign that could definitely, I mean, give us some uptick during the year, maybe not in Q1, but as we go during the year. What are those? I mean, clearly, we mentioned electronics, and you remember that there has been a very strong comparison effect where the activity of ENI was extremely strong in 2024, so you have not seen the underlying trend, but clearly, we see the volume and the carrier gas contribution picking up. We start also to see, I mean, some signals in some sub-segment in the U.S. industrial activity. So, again, we have to be cautious, but those could be positive signals coming later on during the year. Even in Europe, and maybe Emilie will have the opportunity to talk more about that later on, we clearly, I mean, see that some sectors like chemicals are still in the middle of a difficult time with some restructuring. But in the past few weeks, we have heard positive news regarding the steel industry, especially with new announcement new plants, but also restart of some of the production lines. So I think all those could definitely contribute. Again, our base assumption for our financial projection is that it will be basically the same kind of trend for 2026 as what we have seen for 2025. And we do consider that anything better than that would be an upside for us. And regardless of the environment, of course, we are absolutely committed to deliver the margin improvement. And finally, on the outlook and the momentum, I think we have to keep in mind that we have a super high level of business development activity. We mentioned electronics. We mentioned also large industry. We start to see, I mean, a project popping up in the U.S., which is probably the effect of the ratioing. So, all this should be good opportunities and potentially also further MNAs of different sizes. So, this is outlook for 2026. Again, confident in our ability to continue to deliver the improved performance, I would say, regardless of the environment. Jerome. You want to talk about the increase dividend and our thinking behind that? Yeah. Thank you very much for your question. So you're right to point that the increase of dividend is a very good and strong sign of confidence, you know, and that's really the state of mind that we are today. We have also to bear in mind that, you know, when you come back with the different, I would say, parameters, we can see that we have nearly 7 billion euros of cash flow. So this is strong. And the level of gearing today is quite low, at slightly above 31%. So we have the means to distribute, and that's why we have decided, which is very much the result of our, I would say, improvement of our performance plant and overall performance of the horizon. So that's why we have decided. And you know, this is also a sign that... But to come back on your second question, you know, our policy has always been very clear, you know, given this very strong cash flow improvement in the last years, our order of, I would say, allocations, first, we want to continue to finance the capex, you know, and that's important because that's where, when we plan projects, we want to allocate on that. M&A, M&A and significant M&A, and that's why, you know, we have also the means to accelerate and to acquire DIG at the beginning of the year. And the last thing is on distribution on dividends, which again is a very strong crime. So as related to buyback, you know, our current status is very clear. There is no taboo, okay? And this is something that we are looking. We are basically continue to monitor the performance on the on the cash, and we have no specific announcement to make today, but we are looking at all options. Thank you very much, Jerome. Next question. Thank you.
Yes, of course. Now we're going to take our next question. And it comes from John Campbell from Bank of America. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Yeah. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I'll ask two if possible. So coming back to one of the points you made, you talked about potential positive signals in the US in terms of activity. Can you perhaps elaborate on what those potential signals are? And maybe to give you an example, your US tier recently discussed that they see packaged gas volumes as a leading indicator of activity. Do you agree with that assessment? And perhaps how are those activity levels trending? That's my first question. The second question, I noticed there was a big meeting in Antwerp, I think it was last week, to discuss economic competitiveness in the EU, and there have been calls to review the CO2 emissions levy that is placed on industry. Maybe perhaps in light of this, how do you see the level of engagement with potential customers, particularly in Europe and around the energy transition, And perhaps, you know, you mentioned that electronics is a large opportunity. Would you say that sort of electronics potential orders can match the scale of potential previous hopes for energy transition projects? Thank you.
Thank you very much, John. I will ask Adam, who is in the U.S., to comment on the merchant, but also the large industry and the electronics business, probably. And, Emily, we'll talk about... the CO2 situation in Europe and how we see this.
Adam. Yes, absolutely. Thanks, Francois. Thank you, John. So, if I look at activity levels in the U.S., I'm kind of building off of some of Francois' previous points about what we see. We definitely see some positive signals. So, if I go kind of sector by sector and take the merchant business, we continue to see resilient gas volumes. And we see in the merchant business where it's buoyed by the pricing effect that we have, we also see on the hard goods side some potential tailwinds coming in 2026 around sectors like defense, for example, like space and the like. So, we see activity coming in various areas. We're still a bit cautious in that regard because obviously this depends heavily on certainty around tariffs and certainty around interest rates and the like. But overall, when we look forward, we see positive signals. I would say on the really positive side, what we see is a strong shift towards more traditional investment opportunities in business development. So when we look at business development, we can probably talk a little bit about this later, We see a shift from energy transition more towards the examples that Francois mentioned earlier around core investments and existing assets where we see a lot of interest from clients and a continued very strong business development effort on the electronic side and in large industries going forward. So, I would say we have definitely not seen a slowdown in the activity for business development. The customer engagement remains very high. And I'm quite optimistic about 2026 and I think this feeds into the backlog comments that Francois and Jerome talked about earlier and also the portfolio that we see.
Thank you very much, Adam. I cannot resist, I mean, to build upon what you mentioned about space because there has been a lot of discussion recently about the opportunities in the space area. and indeed we are very excited and positive on this because we are today in the space business and we are probably the only player who is covering the full chain from the oxygen hydrogen supply but also i mean krypton xenon for satellite and all the technology from the launcher to the satellite so As you may know, I mean, we have a strong position in Europe and also present in the U.S. In the U.S. alone, we have more than 180 customers in the space ecosystem. So we see the momentum clearly, and we benefit from this. And there are indeed lots of opportunities. What we have to keep in mind, and I don't want to cool down, I mean, the excitement about this new opportunity is that some of the bigger opportunity may end up actually being a sale of equipment. So it's not at this stage traditional over-the-fence business. So there again, I mean, we are very well positioned. But let's not, I mean, it's not necessarily comparable with the rest of the large industry or the electronics business. It may be a one-time sale of equipment for some of those projects. But again, very well positioned and ready to take the opportunities as we have done in the past years and months. I turn over to another area. Emilie, you want to speak a little bit about CO2 and Europe and what we hear and see from customers?
Absolutely. Thank you, François, and good morning, everyone. So, yes, we followed this Antwerp meeting last week carefully. We were actually present in Antwerp. The chemical industry really did some stronger speeches about competitiveness of the European industry and also on ETS, the CO2 tax in Europe. So that created a bit of confusion. Just to remind everyone, a revision of the ETS was anyway due and planned for the second half of this year. So this is not news. But of course, the ETS price, is impacting some of our customers, positively or negatively. For us also, I want to remind everyone, our own emissions are subject to ETS that are covered by our long-term contracts, and the cost of the ETS is passed through to our customers the same way energy is. So definitely chemical industry is suffering right now from structural competitiveness gap, like was said last week in Antwerp. But they are also positive signs in Europe. Francois mentioned one on steel industry. So, on the steel industry, we see positive signs of picking up, volumes picking up in January in particular, more than we had seen in the overall 2025 year. This is helped by quotas, limiting imports to Europe, and of course, the CBAM as well. We also see some positive signs in Germany, so not necessarily on the chemical industry, but in Germany overall with a bit more volumes and also a bit better business mood. And remember, we are very committed to Germany. We've announced the investment of a large basin in electronics last year in Dresden, so this is positive. And overall, we continue to have a strong backlog of projects in Europe as well. So we'll continue work with the European Union, the government, to improve the competitiveness of the industry in Europe, but there are also positive signs that I just mentioned.
Thank you very much, Emilie. I think, John, you had kind of also a side question, which was the share of electronics versus energy transition. I think with what was mentioned by Emilie and also what we see in other regions like China, The energy transition is still alive. So there is still a pipeline of projects, very robust projects. Again, it's a long-term trend. So it's not by any means disappearing, and we are very well positioned there again. What we see, and that was your point, clearly is the pickup in the electronics projects driven by the AI and the race for capacity in chips, but also in memory. And this is clearly accelerating in the past few weeks even. and the need for sovereignty. That's why, I mean, we see in most of the major regions of the world a very, very strong momentum. As of today, there is 40% of our backlog, which is the electronics projects. So you see there is a shift. They are gaining importance. We do expect this to continue to grow. This being said again, there are some energy transition projects that remain. So I think the takeaway probably from this is to have in mind that in the current time, having a very diversified portfolio and being able in terms of footprint and segment to be agile and to capture the opportunities wherever they are, is really a differentiating factor. And as of now, leveraging our number one position in electronic is clearly the strength.
Thank you very much. Thank you, John. Next question, please. Yes, of course.
And now we're going to take our next question. And the question comes line of Tony Jones from Rothschild & Co. Your line is open. Please ask the question.
Excuse me, Tony, your line is open. Tony Jones, your line is open. Have you muted your line?
Dear speakers, there are no answer from Tony Jones' lines and we're going to the next question. Just give us a moment. And the question comes land of Alex Sloan from Barclays. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Yeah. Hi. Morning all. Taking the questions too from me, please. The first one, just on Baytown, I mean, you've been clear that's contractually protected, no financial impact. But, you know, stepping back, do you see any broader, you know, risk of, you know, customer-led causes or deferrals across? decarbonisation projects in your backlog or opportunity pipeline? And what are you seeing in terms of, you know, customer decision cycles? And is your 26, 27 margin trajectory assuming any change in conversion rates? That'll be the first one. And secondly, on electronics, clearly, you know, up to 40% now of the backlog and opportunity pipeline and driving outsized growth. Can you comment on whether we should expect any material mix effect on margins from the outsized growth of this segment over the next two years. And are you seeing any change in the competitive dynamics in this segment as clearly it's driving most of the opportunities at the moment? Thank you.
Alex, thank you very much. So briefly on the first one, no, we don't see projects which are at risk today in the portfolio, in the backlog. Again, I mean, all the projects have secure contracts, secure customers, secure fundings when they are registered in the backlog. You remember we have been extremely prudent in the way we were accounting for the Exxon project. So there may be projects which appear or disappear in the portfolio, but not in the backlog, so no incidents on our financial performance for 2026 and 2027. On the second one, on the electronics, what we see are mostly carrier gas, which today represent 50% of the electronics business activity. So you see gradually it's moving, and those projects in terms of margin should be accretive because in some of those projects the energy is included, but in others the energy is not included, so the margin ratio, is higher. So when they will come online, and keep in mind that those projects takes two, three years to build, yes, they will have a positive margin contribution. At the end of the day, what is very important for us is the return of the capital employed, and that's how we are making a decision. Yes, it's a competitive area. Many people are fighting for those projects. The good news is that given the volume of the projects, we can be selective and we are selective and we choose the battle basically where we have a competitive advantage and we can really create value for our customer. And when you look at 2025, we get more than our share of the new projects and we are committed to continue in that way.
Thank you. Thank you very much. Next question, please.
Yes, of course. And now we're going to take our next question. And the question comes line of Martin Rodiga from . Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Yes. Thanks for taking my two questions, please. First on energy supply. In case several energy suppliers within the European Union have a problem in providing you with energy, To which extent are you protected against that shortfall in energy supply? How is the compensation scheme? Is there any difference in the compensation scheme between the energy source electricity and the energy source natural gas? And the second question also related to energy, on energy costs. I recall that a few years ago you had 3.5 billion energy costs on a global basis. Is that still the case? Is the split energy still 60% electricity and 40% natural gas, or did that change? And is that also a good proxy for the individual regions? Thanks.
Martin, good morning, and thank you very much for your question. I will ask Emilie, who is a specialist of energy in Europe, to speak about it, and probably, Jérôme, you take the global view on the energy cost. Emilie.
Absolutely, thank you. So briefly, of course, energy is a very large part of our cost stack, especially in large industry, so it is important for us. We monitor that quickly on a regular basis, and we are protected by our contract with the pass-through clauses to our customers. And in case, to answer more precisely to your question of a problem of energy supply, then it falls under the type of clauses we have in all our contracts with our customers.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Yeah, thank you very much, Martin, for your question. So, you know, when you refer to the 3.6 billion, it was very much, you know, at the time when, you know, the impact after the beginning of the war in Ukraine. South Africa has significant high prices on the energy cost, and many in Europe, and many on natural gas. So today, I would say that it's coming still above the level of pre-war, but, you know, the mix as related to the share between, you know, natural gas for hydrogen business, and electricity for other, should be relatively close. And those, as said by fully secured and fully, you know, pass through to the customer. So, no big change in terms of the weight of those energy are consumed and represented in the cost action.
Okay. Thank you very much, Jérôme. Thank you, Martine. Next question, please.
Yes, of course. And our next question comes from Georgina Fraser from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Hi. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. It's one question, but I think it might be two or three combined. You have this 200 million in one-time costs related to European restructuring measures for 2026. Could you please put some context around this number? What percent of European sales will be impacted? Are there any networking effect implications? And are these measures in line with existing customer plans, or is Air Liquide moving independently? Thank you.
Thank you very much, Georgina.
So, Emily, do you want to talk a little bit about how you want to transform and to adapt our footprint in Europe and what you have launched?
Absolutely. Thank you, and good morning, Georgina. So, in Europe, we've well embarked on the structural transformation launched at the group level since 2024. So we are adapting our cost structure to the level of activity and to the volumes, and we are restructuring. So maybe I'll give you some elements. First, on the organization and processes. So streamlining our organization, that is what we are doing. Removing layers of management. Simplification of our organization. And, for instance, we moved from four clusters to two in Europe. if I include Medgas that we integrated and merged into the merchant activity to create synergies. So we now have all the Medgas activities under the same operational and management team as merchants in Europe. So this restructuring effort is taking place in all parts of Europe. The idea, like I said, is really to adapt the cost structure to the activity, moving some tasks, to the GBS as well. This is an important part of our transformation. And also really restructuring to be prepared for the long term to be more profitable over the long term. So this is structural. We're also streamlining our processes and tools, having the same way of doing things across Europe, one single state-of-the-art ERP across Europe, And finally, also, using more and more AI to automate, to optimize our operations in all domains, customer care, call centers, in sales, in safety, in industrial parts of the activity.
Yep. Thank you very much. So that's for Europe, which is the bulk of the 200 million. I mean, I think this is 70% of that. There are other things which are similar in other parts of the world. What is absolutely key is that in this world, which is transforming, we want to anticipate. So part of it is to adapt the footprint, and that's what Emine has mentioned, and we want to do that with courage, with determination, in a respectful manner for our employees and for our customers, because those are the values of Air Liquide. But we have to do it, and we have started doing and already done that in several cases, and we will continue to do that. At the same time, and that's the positive news, we continue to invest in leading segment and to support and to drive this transformation, as we mentioned before. And as a matter of fact, in the past three years, we have invested more than 3 billion euros in Europe, showing that we are positioning ourselves to be able to be a key partner and key supplier for the transformed Europe industry that is being built. So thank you very much, Georgina, and good to hear you. And next question, please.
And now we're going to take our next question. And the question comes from JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Yeah, hi. Thanks for taking my questions. The first question I was just, sorry, first question is on your, investment opportunities and backlog. I think you have included the part from DIG now in those numbers and I was just trying to see the underlying shift if I remove DIG and it seems for the first time maybe in many quarters the sequentially the backlog and investment opportunities are actually down versus Q3 and I'm just curious is this all because of the removal of the Exxon project or do you actually see that the incremental opportunities are probably slowing? And just second associated question, you know, you got this compensation from Exxon project in 2025 because, you know, it's been terminated. Did this have a positive impact on your second half margins? Because I see there's a big jump in the other income in the second half of And I'm assuming almost all of that is associated with this project. If that's the case, if you can quantify. And last question, simple. I don't see any guidance on startup revenue this time. So maybe if you can just help us what you think we should have in mind. Thank you.
Thank you very much, Shetan. Thank you for your question. I think Jerome will be pleased to answer the three questions, and they complement if needed. But go ahead, Jerome. The first one on the DIG and the contribution of DIG and the backlog. Yeah, so it's very simple. You know, when you took the backlog of $4.9 billion today, you have about $200 million of backlog coming from DIG. So 4.7 plus 0.2. And you recall, Chetan, it's very much aligned with what we said last time during the call when we made the announcement of the idea that there was some capex underlying. So that's very much aligned, which is showing that we basically have a very good trend on this opportunity. On the portfolio of opportunities, you have a total to 4.6 billion, a record. And it does include about 800 million of the idea. So it's quite clear. And just, Chetan, on this one, on the backlog from one quarter to another one, from my point of view, there is no worries. Basically, this is normal life of pipeline of the project. You have the projects which are exiting because the projects are starting up. So it's normal that depending on the timing, they go up and down. So the general trend is a very solid backlog, which is continuing to increase. If you look at the year-to-year basis, it's plus 15%, as I mentioned. So from that point of view, absolutely no worries. Excellent contribution for the year? Yes. So this was, yeah, I hear what you said. So basically, it's neutral on margin because, you know, the compensation we had from the customer has basically covering our cancellation cost and so on. So that's basically neutral on margin for 2025. That's what you have to bear in mind. You have also to bear in mind that we have no financial exposure on that. That's the idea. Okay? And your last question started for 2026. So we have not disclosed this contribution for 2026 for a few reasons, Chetan. First, you know, Francois explained that many times, there is shift today in contract structure. You know, the fact that we have some energy transition projects which have increased, which are going more and more into a towing-style contract, Basically, you know, it's polluting the fact on this, you know, contribution. So that's the very first point. The second point is, as you know, there is geographical energy volatility, sorry, and disparities, you know, in energy pricing. So basically, as we are showing this number with energy contribution, it's great artificial difference in sales contribution from the same level of capex, which gives a difficulty to estimate future sales contribution. The second reason is And the last reason, by the way, if I mention that none of our competitors currently disclose its contribution from startup and ramp-up. So all these different elements make us the conclusion that it was not super relevant at this stage. We are looking potentially as other indicator review. We see, you know, maybe on EBIT level and so on, but it's bitterly to say. But the main reason is that it's becoming a proxy which is less relevant to predict the growth overall for the reason mentioned by Jerome. But he mentioned energy transition, but as a matter of fact, it will be the same with the electronics project because some of the have energy included, others do not. So again, the traditional way of looking and predicting the sales with the amount of investment does not work anymore. We try to find a way to help you to do your forecast, but that's why today we are dropping this proxy.
Got it. Thank you.
All right. Thank you very much. I think we still have one or two questions. Oh, we have time for one or two questions. We have many more questions, so go ahead.
Now we're going to take our next question. And it comes to the line of Jean-Luc Romain from CIC CIB. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. It relates to the cement industry. When we look at some of your clients or partners in the industry, there are several projects to decarbonize their cement plants. And your technology, your CREOCAP technology is all over the place on their website. What are the, could you give us an idea of what's moving towards a decision? What's still a long way ahead?
Thank you very much, Jean-Luc.
Emilie, do you want to speak about this? Sure. Thank you, Jean-Luc. So on the cement industry, this is one of our key growth opportunities for the future, like you said, around our cryocap technology, proprietary, and we are really the leader in the carbon capture technology. So the discussions remain active with our potential customers in the cement industry. They are continuing on their journey, knowing that they have all the commitment towards carbon neutrality by 2050. There's no way they can achieve that without carbon capture. So we continue the discussion with all of them. Of course, it depends now on FID to answer precisely your question. It depends on the EPS price, on the regulations that will be in place, and also on the whole chain. It's not just about the capture, but the capture, the transport, and the sequestration. that need to also be ready and also missing a few still mechanisms like CCSD to really make it to the final investment decision. But again, momentum is still there with all our cement industry players.
Thank you very much, Emilie.
So we'll take two quick questions, two more questions, please.
Yes, of course. And now we're going to take our next question for today. And the question comes line of Sebastian Bray from Berenberg. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Hello. Good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. Can I ask about the backlog composition? Because leaving aside the question of how much is electronics and how much is associated with other end markets, have there been any changes relative to what Air Liquide has done historically in terms of contract length and the split between large industries and onsite, and I'd include parts of electronics in that, and merchant gases. The reason I ask this is that Lynda has pretty high backlogs close to record. Her products looks fairly healthy, excluding the new energy parts, and her liquid is at record levels. And if we hit two to three years' time and everybody is bringing online new projects, does that pose an issue for merchant pricing? given that a lot of these large on-site projects are going to be adding capacity to merchants. Thank you.
Well, thank you very much, Sébastien, for your question. So, as you know, we are extremely disciplined in the way we are evaluating projects. So, every time there is a project, we look at, of course, the merit of the, I would say, the anchor customer when it's a large industry or electronics customer. And if there is a potential upside with the merchant, we do consider that after evaluating Careful consideration of the market potential and the local situation. And what you have to take into account here is clearly that the merchant market is a local market. So it depends on the situation. And with those new investments, you can bring very effective new source of products. in regions where there are lacking products, and there are still quite a bit of those globally. So today, I don't see a threat, at least from the ARDT point of view. I cannot speak for our competitors, but we are extremely careful and disciplined in the way we justify new merchant investment. And again, it's based on the local situation. So that's how we are looking at things for the backlog. Again, mostly driven for us by large industry and electronics. Thank you very much.
Last question, please.
Yes, of course. And now we're going to take our last question for today. And it comes line of James Hooper from Bernstein. Your line is open. Please ask your question.
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for the chance to ask questions. I've got a couple, please. First one is on the 2027 margin target. Great to hear the extension of that target. Are the measures that will deliver this going to be the same as the ones driving 2025 or 2026, or will they be different? And then a second question, I'd like to pick up on some of the about lower demand in Asia in large industries. Can you give us an indication of what's happening on the ground in Asia, and particularly China? Is there any effect from overcapacity anti-involution? And also a quick update on the helium market, please. Thank you.
Thank you very much. I will start with the last one, maybe on Asia, because we didn't talk so much about Asia. Right now, again, we see a clear momentum in electronics across the board, and this is for a new project, but we see also picking up clearly. So that's a very positive one. When you talk about overcapacity, mostly it relates to what we have seen in the manufacturing in China, and we see some slowdown or maybe extended turnaround from some of the customers in China, but I would say On average, we are probably less impacted than other players because of the quality of the portfolio of companies we have. We have been extremely disciplined in selecting over the years, I mean, the top tier customers, which are the ones typically who have the best competitive situation. This being said, we do expect further consolidation in some sectors, which overall should bring benefit to have cleaner, more efficient manufacturing capabilities for China and to export. Regarding the helium situation, again, globally, I mean, we are in a situation where there is... low demand compared to the supply for helium. Keep in mind that for a liquid, and that's not necessarily the case for all our competitors, helium is only 3% to 4% of the sales, and 80% of our business is based on long-term contracts, both in electronics, which is still growing, and industrial merchants. So, yes, we are impacted mostly in some regions. China is clearly one market where we see a decrease in volume and decrease in pricing. But overall, our business is still strong and well-resilient. Regarding the 2027 margin objective, I think really what you need to take out of that is the confidence that we have in our ability to continue to provide the margin improvement. And the reason that we are confident is because this is based on the structural efficiencies, which are the results of the transformation program. If you step back, you have seen that three years ago, I mean, a lot of the margin improvement was coming from the pricing. The pricing is still there, and we have really moved up our capabilities to secure pricing whenever it's possible, but with the lowest inflation, the pricing contribution is decreasing everywhere. But what we see is a pickup of the efficiencies, again, almost 30% more this year compared to last year, and we do expect this to continue. As I mentioned today and previously, we are at the beginning of the journey for many of the transformation initiatives. So there's more to come in 27, 28, and so on. Maybe not always at the same rate, but for 2027, we are very confident with this margin improvement. So thank you very much. This concludes our session. Thank you very much for all your insightful questions, for sure. In conclusion, I would like to say that after a strong performance in 2025, Air Liquide enters 2026 with a proven model, record backlog, momentum in transformation, and a clearly extended horizon for profitability. And we are all, all ready to build on this momentum. Thank you very much for your attention. I wish all of you a very good day.