Ambu A S Ord

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the AMBU earnings release Q3 2025-26 conference call. I'm Vicky, the course call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a Q&A session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star, then zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Britt Meelby Jensen, CEO. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning, everyone, and welcome to this earnings call for our Q3 2025-26 My name is Britt Meelby Jensen. I'm the CEO of Amble and I have Henrik Skak Bender, our CFO with me today. So if we move to the next slide and then the next one again, I'll start with a review of our business and progress before I hand over to Henrik to go through our financials. And starting on the next slide, please, with the highlights for Q3. Overall, We see a very strong shift towards single use endoscopy. We continue to lead this conversion to single use by bringing new innovative solutions to the market that can address a wide range of procedures, also supported by key opinion leaders across the different areas that we are in. In the quarter, this was most evident in the reacceleration we have seen in respiratory, which, as you know, is the first area we entered. Here we grew 17.1%, which was driven by our bronchoscopy portfolio, but supported by the strong synergistic effect from our new video laryngoscope solution, SureSight. So in urology, we grew urology ENT and GI. We grew 15% in the quarter, resulting in a 16% growth overall of the endoscopy solution. In ANPM, after two quarters of negative growth, we returned to positive growth with 1.6%. and we also announced recently a new solution Neuraline Cup MRI CT that is positioned to support further growth recovery. Our EBIT margin came in at 13.5% both reflecting increased investments and partly offset both by tariff reclaims and scalability. We expect the reported EBIT margin to land in the upper end of our 12 to 14% guidance. And in line with the communication that we had in Q2, that we were trending towards 10% organic growth for the full fiscal year, we are confirming this as we are updating our revenue guidance to around 10% growth. So in total, we continue to be very well positioned to deliver strong organic growth and increase profitability over our summer head periods. Let's turn to the next page, please. And here you see a lot of numbers as usual. And overall, these reflect a very strong financial position, cash generation and high revenue growth. So specifically, as I just mentioned, I want to highlight the 16% endoscopy growth and that this segment now represents 64% of our business. While NPM has turned to positive growth, the volume of uplift will take some time. The low single digit growth is the driver of our updated revenue guidance for the full year. Also let me again here highlight the EBIT margin which grew 13.5% and again highlighting that this represents a stronger growth acceleration in the second half of the year as we communicated in November when we started the year. I'll let Henrik cover this in more detail. So overall, we believe it's a strong financial position and we are continuing to invest a lot in both innovation when it comes to commercial and R&D. Let's look at the business in more detail on the next slide, please, starting with respiratory, where we posted really strong growth this quarter of 17.1%. And when we look at the rolling 12 months, this amounts to 11.5%. Single use is in this segment becoming increasingly the standard of care as there's a lot of room to continue to grow with reusable still making up the majority of the procedures in this segment. Our growth was driven by our Broncoscope portfolio, so the A Scope 4 and A Scope 5, where customers are also with the A Scope 5 still willing to pay for premium solutions. SureSight, as I mentioned in the beginning, is still an important growth driver and that has both created a new adjacency for our business and also a synergistic market opportunity with our Broncoscope portfolio. So it contributes thereby both as an individual revenue stream and together with the full solutions of Broncoscopes. When we take a step back, we are very optimistic about the respiratory portfolio in general. And I want to highlight when we look at these numbers that this is a great example of how we are proving that the playbook that we have and that we have used in recent years that works and how we continue to drive new innovation that is differentiated in the market and thereby accelerating growth. Also in this segment, which was the first we entered as most of you know now many years ago. So if we move to the next slide, this is the other part of our endoscopy solution. So urology, ENT, and GI. And here we delivered 15% growth. And when we look at the rolling 12 months, this amounts to 16.9% growth. As we mentioned in Q2, we were impacted a bit by some of the deliberate US commercial adjustments that we did in April that positioned us well for long-term growth. continue to see momentum coming from those adjustments that we made. But when we look at where the growth is coming from, most of this is really driven by our existing portfolio of sister scopes and ENT. And it's a continuation of the momentum that we have seen in the last quarters. When we then to comment on the 16.9 rolling growth, this is also the level that you should expect short term for the business. I believe it's quite solid growth and we have good solutions in the pipeline on top of this that will bring to market over the next two years that should both support and also strengthen this growth momentum that we see in this group. So let me move to the next page and to anesthesia and patient monitoring. But before doing that, I think I should clarify that overall, The growth that we see in the endoscopy segment of 15 plus percent this year is something that we believe is very well on track to deliver over the strategy period 15 to 20 percent as we set out to do last year. And the 15 plus percent growth represents also what we communicated back in November. So now moving to ANPM, which now represents 36% of our overall revenue of the company. And we returned, as I mentioned, to positive growth of 1.3%. And when we look at the rolling last 12 months, this is then now 1.3%. Patient monitoring continues to show solid growth here, but anesthesia is where we're seeing the annualization effect from some of the volumes that we lost on selected accounts as we communicated in Q2. It's important to say that we have not seen any further losses in customers in the recent quarter. The changes that we saw came on the back of two years of price increases where it takes some time to get that volume back that we lost. We still expect once this is normalized that the business will follow the market growth of 3-5% and overall we believe that when you look at this segment the growth should going forward be supported by the new MRI and CT compatible electrodes that we recently announced. So let's move to the next slide and look at the progress that we've had on the strategy. So there's a lot of this slide showing that we have and we are continuing to see a lot of momentum here nine months into our Sumo head strategy. And I'm very pleased with the execution and the speed that we see across the organization. I'm not going to go through all the details that you see on this slide, but let me just highlight A couple of things here. One is the sure side reiterating that we are very much on track and very excited about the progress we see on the launch of this and also the very strong positive customer feedback that we continue to get on this solution. Then also the second thing I want to highlight here is our endo intelligence which we launched at our capital market day and where we are continuing to expand our capabilities in this field and we're continuing also to advance our solution and one recent validation of this is the best-in-class cyber security validation that we got on our monitors and this is really crucial for the endo intelligence platform because as some of you may recall we are offering integration into the hospitals and into hospital systems as the only single use player Something where we are seeing increasing momentum and where the cybersecurity validation is really crucial. But let's now take a step back and just remind everyone on the strategic priorities that we made with the strategy on the next page. Because when we launched the strategy, we called out urology and respiratory as the key focus areas. and why was that? That was basically because we see a very strong trend towards single use solutions becoming the standard of care and that this is most profound in these two areas. We need the single use conversion and also our winning formula as I alluded to earlier is very much driven by innovation with the aim of differentiating and for us to provide the full solutions for our customers and continuing to deliver strong commercial execution. Let me just double click on these two areas starting with respiratory on the next page before I hand over to Henrik. So respiratory is, as I said, a clear example of how we are winning with the broadest portfolio with the 17.1% growth in Q3 and more to come. We saw competition a few years back but came back with a full solution that addressed a lot of the different procedures in this segment. You see different parts of our solution on the left-hand side of this page. And I want to put specific attention to our SureSight solution that we just brought to market because it is a very nice adjacent new segment for us. But it's also where we see a lot of synergies with our BroncoScope portfolio. If we look at the middle and where we have tried to illustrate where is it really we see the growth coming from in this market. And the biggest growth driver, as you see on the top here, is really the conversion from reusable platforms. Despite the respiratory being a more mature market, we still continue to see this as a very strong and by far the strongest driver of growth. Then we are also gaining some market share that we were losing previously. In particular, this is a very U.S.-focused market. And then lastly, the new product launches with SureSight can expand the relevance of our procedures and open up for new areas of growth. So this is precisely the split in growth. Sorry, it's not so easy to have a precise split, but this is really how we see some of the key contributors to growth that we want to highlight. And as we look ahead, and which is what we're trying to illustrate on the right side of this slide, The next generation of solutions that we have in development will continue to support that we both increase our revenue with existing customers, that we expand also the procedure relevant in the existing markets. And this is very much the ICU and OR, as we've talked a lot about before. And then we are also being focused on driving new adoption in new markets where the OR suite in particular is an area that where there's still a lot of untapped potential. The innovation roadmap we have, we don't talk a lot about this for competitive reasons, but we do see exciting solutions in development that can strengthen our position in this area. So let me finish off my section here with urology on the next page. Because urology is, as you know, a market that consists of two clinical areas, cystoscopy and ureteroscopy. We stepped into cystoscopy as first movers in 2020, and we have had time to build a broader portfolio here We continue to be market leaders and to gain market share here, which is very much driven by the structural conversion from reusable solutions with a strong momentum also for our premium solution, Ascope 5 system. For ureteroscopy, we entered this segment more recent and we launched our first solution into a very competitive market where we were for the first time not first movers. Therefore, we are still developing our portfolio in this segment. So again, here, as you see in the middle here, we have tried to illustrate also how we see growth and where the growth is coming from. And it is, again, also the exceptionally strong conversion from reusable endoscopes, both in ureteroscopy and cystoscopy, validated by the key opinion leaders and also with an increasing entry of other players. Then we see the single use market share being more stable in cystoscopy and compared to ureteroscopy where we are gaining share but from a low base and not at the speed that we were originally planning. Then most of our growth is coming here, as I mentioned before, from existing solutions. So that is very much our cystoscopes that is the main driver in urology in a very fast growing single use market. So while we have the strong offering in cystoscopy performing really well, we will have the same approach in this segment as I talked about for respiratory, and that is to continue to advance our solutions and our offering and the relevance for more procedures. In ureteroscopy, our strong focus is really to gain share and we'll do that with our existing solution, but we're also looking to win by bringing new innovation into this segment within the next two years that should strengthen our offering in this segment. So before handing over to Henrik, maybe I should finish by summing up to say that how we see the market is really that single use is becoming the standard of care and the The trend towards single use is moving fast. We are continuing to lead this, and what is really the most important growth driver is not so much the small market share shifts, but it's really the conversion from reusable, where we see our endoscopy solutions growth still at 15 plus percent this year, and again confirming that we are well on track for a CAGR of 15 to 20 percent over our sumo head strategy period. So with this, I'll move to the next slide and hand over to Henrik to go through the financials.

Thank you, Britt. Thank you for the update. Good day, good morning to all. I'll now take you through the financial review for Q3. As usual, I'll start with revenue development, then cover regional performance, talk a bit more on margin in particular, cash flow, and finally the updated outlook as Britt already referred to. So let's first have a closer look at reported revenue and organic growth on the next page here. Looking at our overall growth performance, we delivered 10.3% organic growth, resulting now in a 12-month rolling revenue of organic growth of 9%. As Britt said, this was really driven by strong growth in endoscopy, with now a revenue share of 64% and continuing to increase as endoscopy is outgoing anesthesia and patient monitoring. Respiratory Within Endoscopy delivered a particular strong quarter with 17.1% organic growth for the quarter and accelerating 12 months rolling organic growth. While AMBM returned to positive growth for Q3 after a more challenging first half, it's still a modest growth expected for the rest of the year. The growth is still challenged with selected customers in US where we're seeing volume declines, and that is still a full year effect that we expect to see across the year while we are now also seeing positive momentum across the business in many other areas. And that also means that ANPM again is back in positive volume growth. This change though is still the main driver behind our updated organic revenue growth outlook of around 10%. I'll come back to that when I review the outlook in more detail. Last but not least, FX continued to be a headwind in Q3 compared to Q2, where we continued to see a negative development in the US dollar DKK currency, which continued to be both impacting us negatively on top line, on gross margin, and slightly on EBIT margin. Let's have a closer look at the regional performance on the next page. Overall, we continue to see solid growth across all regions. The strong growth in all regions is within endoscopy solutions. Growth in North America continued to be really solid, also endoscopy solutions, but still impacted by the lower growth in particular anesthesia on the non-exclusive contracts and the lower volume that I addressed before, and we also mentioned now Q2. Both EMEA and particular rest of the world are on solid growth tracks, continuing to be driven by the really solid underlying endoscopy growth in all markets. With that, let's have a closer look at margin and start with gross margin. So looking at gross margin, you continue to see a steady, next page please operator. Thank you. Starting with gross margin, we continue to see a solid developing trend overall where we are compared to last year improving our gross margin by 60 basis points for the quarter specifically moving or ending at 59.5% compared to 58.9% for the same quarter the last year. Though for this quarter specifically, it is a lower level and that is mainly driven by FX, by the continued FX development and the negative development I just referred to in the US dollar GKK currency. The underlying trend of the continuous positive development in gross margin and the drivers of those are really still unchanged, being one, better output efficiency in our manufacturing sites around the world. continuing the journey of being more effective and scaling our footprint both in China and Malaysia, but in particular in Mexico. Improved pricing governance across the board, but particular with high focus on ANPM. And last not least, a continuous positive driver being that the higher growth in endoscopy with stronger underlying gross margin continues to drive a better product mix and therefore a better gross margin. Let's move on to EBIT. For EBIT specifically, there's a number of things that are moving around and therefore I really want to make sure that we are clear in terms of how to look at the reported EBIT and also the many different adjustments that are moving back and forth. Reported EBIT was 13.5%, an improvement of 2.2 percentage points versus the same quarter of the last year. In our report, This was previously labeled as EBIT before special items, but as we don't really have any special items in this financial year, nor in the comparison year, we're just calling it reported EBIT. On the adjustments, to reach what we call in our presentation adjusted EBIT, this is really what you could say a like for like comparison from previous year. Unlike in Q1 and Q2, where we saw a positive effect from these adjustments, It's really a different adjustment here in Q2. The underlying building blocks are as follows. We still pay tariffs in the quarter, but these were lower than in Q1 and Q2, following the trend, as we said from the start, that the paid tariffs in the first half would be higher than the paid tariffs in the second half. And we still consider or expect this number to decrease further. ending basically at a runway cost of around one percentage point negative effect for tariffs that we will carry over into the next financial year, something that will also come back to. On refunds, we received slightly less than 40 million DKK back from the US government on the reclaimed IEPA tariffs. This is slightly less than 40 million, because there's also an FX adjustment and smaller transfer pricing adjustments. But as you can see in our interim report, Note 4, this is really the difference between the balance that we communicated in 2.2 and the balance that we're now communicating as still outstanding in 2.3. In addition to that, after the closing of the quarter, we received additional 85 million DKK, which were not recognized in Q3, but will be recognized instead in Q4. One of the reasons why we're also now communicating a higher landing point of our EBIT margin for the full year in the upper range of our guidance of 12 to 14%. As the refunds were larger than the expenses in Q3, net impact on tariffs for this quarter, unlike previous quarters, was slightly positive. In addition to that, we also had a smaller impact from FX, as I also mentioned earlier, if you compare this quarter to the previous two quarters, particularly driven by the US dollar DKK development. Altogether, this means that the adjusted EBIT, as referred to here on the slide, landed at 12.5%. This is below quarter one and quarter two adjusted EBIT of 15.2 and 14.5 respectively. We did indicate in our last quarter that we did expect quarter three to be a bit lower than quarter four, and that's also part of what you're seeing here. And we are comfortable today reiterating that quarter four will be higher, both on re-drop, partly driven by tariffs, but also on the underlying EBIT. To three specifically, was impacted by a few small-time costs, particularly the commercial expansion that we mentioned in our Q2, where we did do extra investments, particularly in the US, to expand our sales force. And there was also always a couple of ramp-up costs on those. This is part of the selling expense line. and secondly we had a number of strategic projects that also were expensed in the admin line and all together this contributed to a slight step down in the adjusted EBIT margin from what we saw in Q1 and Q2, but we are comfortable that this will turn around for Q4. Looking specifically at Q4, the step up in the adjusted EBIT margin will mainly be driven by three factors. As implicit in our underlying updated guidance, we still expect higher growth in Q4, and that will drive an overall better operating leverage. Secondly, we expect a better gross margin, partly because of the continued improvement of mix towards endoscopy, and partly because of geographical mix, as we are expecting higher growth in US. Lastly, and the biggest driver of this will also be a lower OPEX ratio, in the fourth quarter, particularly driven by over-operating leverage, as I mentioned also with a higher growth, particularly in the lines of selling expenses and admin, where we do expect to see higher leverage for quarter four. So net-net, we are seeing what we see as a positive development The quarter three is affected by a few one-time costs that are mainly impacting our admin and selling expenses. But overall, we are well on track. And with what we see for quarter four and the guidance where we're now expecting to land in the upper end of the 12 to 14, we feel very comfortable about it. Last but not least, coming back to my point about tariffs, I also just want to reiterate that the tariff costs, the underlying tariff costs, are still developing as expected. And we will, we believe, end at a point where at the end of the year, we'll still be carrying around a negative one percentage point of impact before any tariff refunds as a negative impact you will also carry into next year. Exactly how we will end up accounting for the remaining outstanding refund claims is still an open question. We have another 70 million that could either be paid as part of Q4, i.e. if they're paid to us before end of September, or could be paid later in the year. We maintain the view that we are conservative on this, and we therefore not recognize any of the outstanding tariff reclaims until they're ultimately paid to our accounts. With that, let me move on to cash flow. We continue to see a really strong cash flow driven by both and mainly and stronger operating leverage from our improved underlying EBITDA, but also with a positive development in networking capital. The underlying EBITDA is obviously also here helped by the stronger or the additional reclaims of tariffs. But overall, the main driver of this is really our operating leverage. That also means that we are reporting a net free cash flow for the quarter of 154 million. And we continue, therefore, also to see a stronger and stronger cash conversion now for the quarter specifically at 48%. And therefore, also reiterating that for the full year, we're still expecting a cash conversion above 40%. With that, on the last page, let me turn to Outlook. So ultimately, we are today, as Britt also mentioned in her opening, updating our Outlook as extension of our updated view of the AMPM expectations for the full year. We are therefore now guiding towards an around 10% organic growth, which really reflects that the anesthesia and patient monitoring is now expected to be very low single digit. Positive, but very low. We continue to see positive oil volume uptake in NPM, and with that momentum we're seeing both in quarter three and also what we've seen since we closed the quarter, we feel comfortable that we can deliver on this. Very importantly, again, to highlight, as Britt also did in her closing, we're seeing really solid underlying growth in endoscopy with a continuing strong momentum, and we're therefore still guiding for plus 15% organic growth in endoscopy, which keeps us within the 15 to 20% Organic Growth Kicker throughout our summer head period. On EBIT margin, we are maintaining our EBIT margin guidance of 12% to 14%. We still expect the uptick in quarter four, as I just explained on the previous page. This will be supported by tariff reclaims, but also by a stronger underlying EBIT margin for the fourth quarter. Last but not least, as I also just mentioned, our cash conversion remains on track to deliver a 40% cash conversion for the full year in alignment with previous guidance and in alignment with our long-term target. With that, I want to hand it back to the operator for Q&A.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and 1 on their telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star then two. Questioners on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode while asking a question. In the interest of time, please limit yourself to two questions. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. The first question from Tyra Lee, UBS. Please go ahead.

Morning, Britt and Henrik. Thank you for the questions. My first question is just on margins. So I really appreciate that colour that you gave on the Q3 specific factors on the underlying margin or what you're calling adjusted EBIT now. Could you just provide a little more colour on why exactly the things we see in Q3 would be one-offs and not persist into Q4? For instance, surely investments in commercial expansion within the Euro, ENT and GI segment doesn't just drop off. and you know that was just one part of the the bit that you highlighted there and then my second question please is one of our top incoming is you know what this all means for 2027 there's a lot for us to consider right now would it be possible for you to just speak through the key moving parts on both the top line and margins for next year especially in light of the current inflationary context thank you very much

Thank you, Tyra. Thank you for your attention and for good questions. Perhaps I start with margin and then we can talk a little bit more about the longer term. I just want to caution today, of course, we are still within the current financial year and only as part of Q4 we will start really talk about the guidance for next year. So the answers for the longer term will still a little bit await what we will comment on in our Q4. On the margin, I think the point of one-offs are really trying to spell out three main things. First, you can say that for the quarter, the commercial investments, as you rightfully put, are investments mainly in people, as we also mentioned in our Q2. This is particularly U.S.-focused on how we are more deliberate and, you could say, focused in our energy and geology sales forces, where we've added more people. The one, of course, element of this is that there were always some ramp up where people are onboarded, trained, and before they hit the ground running on the sales teams, you don't really see the full operating leverage. And that will impact the first quarter in particular when you're staffing up and spending costs on recruiting and onboarding. The second and equally big, if not bigger element is that we had a couple of strategic projects. We continuously invest in expanding our understanding of customer patterns, of strategic opportunities and also long-term opportunities for us. And we had a couple of projects that we were running just before summer where expenses for those were included in admin costs. These are not things that will reoccur. These are studies that are now over and therefore I'm also again referring to those as one-offs. The last, which is, of course, a difficult one and not exactly one of, is this question of FX, where, again, if you compare quarter three to quarter two, that continuous decline of the US dollar DKK is still impacting us negatively for the quarter alone, even though we are over time have that natural hedge that I've talked about before, where we will see also reduction in COX, but with some delay. And therefore, there's still some timing effect in COX for Q3 that is impacting us negatively. If you look at the longer term, I guess what we can say today is really what Fred already said. I think one, we feel on a good track on endoscopy, plus 15% growth for this year and within the long-term CAGR of 15 to 20%. On margin, I think the overall themes are the same. And I just want to reiterate again, because that's also been a question on tariff. We are seeing a run rate cost still for next year being around that negative one percentage point before any tariff refunds going into next year. So I think that's as far as we'll go. There's still a lot of things we can see that we are executing on as planned on the operating leverage. And today, I feel it's still a bit too early to talk about what would be potentially stationary topics for next year. Most of these are things we can manage and navigate mid to long term, so I will postpone that more detailed answer to our Q4.

Maybe just a few comments on the revenue, and I've already said that, and again, we cannot be too specific, but if we look at what we see as the trend in respiratory, I think the growing momentum that we have from a broader portfolio, I think that's very much supporting our delivery in On the strategic, on our human head strategy, sorry, with a strong continued momentum expected in respiratory. And then as we talked about urology, ENC and DI, I mean, we are also here continuing to lead the conversion to single use and feel very confident also around the level that we have seen when we look at the recent rolling 12 months. and continuation of that and around that level. So I think that's as specific as we can be now, but we continue to be very focused on endoscopy and we are really on plan to continue to deliver strong growth across all segments here.

Thank you, Sarah.

Thank you, Jean-Pierre Knikki.

The next question from Marty Brenner, Nordea. Please go ahead.

Hi Britt and Henrik, thank you for taking my questions. I have two, if I may. Actually, I would maybe just like to understand also the margin a little bit better, so I'll try to slice it and dice it a little bit differently. Maybe if you can just talk about the commercial investments that you have had in this quarter, based on my math, and you can correct me if I'm wrong here, but it seems like a distribution... A ramp up cost of around 30 million DKK from Q2 to Q3 when I take out all of the tariff FX impact quarter over quarter. Can you maybe just elaborate a little bit on what that actually is going to be? What is that investment targeting and how should we view sort of the step up in distribution costs from here on? Is this sort of a front loading of investments into next year? Thank you.

Yeah, so good question, Martin, and I can certainly go a little bit more deep into it. So obviously, you could say from one perspective with the tariff reclaims and more money in the bank, we are looking at other certain things we would do differently. But the first key answer is we have not front-loaded massive costs. I think on the transfer of production, there are certain one-off costs and also some that land in the distribution line when you're transferring production lines. They have not been accelerated massively, but we are continuing to invest in this scale-up and that's part of what you're seeing here. Except for that, and without going into the specifics of the math that you're highlighting here, there are around 30 million. I think the key point we want to make is we continue to invest in the commercial organization. We try to be quite clear when we do it. And in Q2, we specifically called out the fact that we were investing in U.S. in that separation of the urology and ENT sales force because we see so much opportunity for both. and now here in Q3 we have that basically settled. So therefore we're not expecting a further gradual step up in this cost line into Q4. That's more or less all run rate into the Q3 number you already see here. And I know this has been a debate we've had before, you know, when exactly are these materializing? But I think therefore the key statement is for Q4 alone, there's not an expected big step up in commercial costs. Longer term, a key point I want to reiterate is we continuously look for growth investments, of course, and some of those have longer payback than others. And that's still something we're continuously evaluating when we look at the long-term picture. But for the short term and more specifically for Q4, as I said also in my update on the underlying EBIT margin or the adjusted EBIT margin, we're actually expecting to see a higher level of leverage. Also on the commercial cost into Q4 given that we already made these investments and the costs were in Q3.

Thank you. Just my second question please would be on the urology and CNTI. Britt, this is maybe a bit more to you in terms of the trajectory that we're seeing. A gradual slowdown that we've been seeing for many quarters now with a few bumps, you can say, during the last maybe two years or so. So what should make the market and analysts and investors believe that we will see an infection point in this slowing segment altogether? Is it Thank you for that question, Martin. And let me maybe take a step back to say, I mean, last year at the Capital Market Day where we talked about the market potential, and then you can say, has anything changed

The only main thing that has really changed from there is when we look at Euridro, as I alluded to in my presentation, that we are not gaining market share as fast as we expected in that. And then you can say, why is that? I think there are two things to this. One is the fact that it is a much more crowded market with many more players. And we have also talked about this before. And then The combination of that and that these sales cycles are longer because these procedures are more complex. But other than that, nothing has changed. Then if I answer your question of why is it you should believe that we will continue to grow here, we are right now, as I alluded to in my presentation, seeing most of the growth coming from A Scope 4 Sesto and A Scope 4 Rhino Laringo in this segment specifically. And these are both solutions that have been in the market for six, seven years. And we do have improved solution in develop that we will actually A S Ord A S Ord A S Ord Thank you very much. Their workflow efficiency, we're the only company that has that. We are very far ahead also because we have very strong documentation on cybersecurity and we're seeing the customers adopting that. And then we have some more groundbreaking solutions when it comes to intelligence in development that I'll not go too much into for competitive reasons. But I think that whole thinking around the solutions that we bring moving from Thank you very much. Good momentum with the new approach we took in this segment with our Ascope Gastro that we are getting momentum. We have been very clear about that we have not allocated a lot of commercial resources to this because we wanted to learn and see how is it that we can really, in this being by far the biggest endoscopy segment, how we can also drive the conversion in this segment as we have done in other segments. And I think we are getting much closer now Thank you very much. The next question from Anshul Verma, JP Morgan, please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, Britt and Henrik. Thanks for taking my questions. I have two, please. One is just looking at your midterm targets. If we look at your EBIT margin target that you had released around a year ago, which was for around 20% margins by FY28 and over 20% by FY30, looking at where we are right now, Can you help us understand that bridge from let's say from around 12% this year and that's calculated from an underlying ex-tariff refunds basis? How would that trajectory look? Are you still comfortable around those targets and do you think there's any risk to those targets? And then the second one again on the midterm guidance was around Anesthesia and Patient Monitoring. You had upgraded that guidance to 3% to 5% top-line growth. How are we thinking of that business longer term? and how do you believe volumes will develop? Again, are you comfortable with that range and do you think there's any risk to the upper end of that guidance?

Thank you, Angel, and great to have you back. Thank you for the questions. So let me start on margin. I think the first thing I want to remind us all is that when this 20% target was set actually originally back in Zoomin, in Zoomin's strategy, and reiterated in our Capital Markets Day last year around this time, We also caveated with we will evaluate potential growth investments along the way and growth remains our first priority. That doesn't mean that I'm today changing the target, but I just want to remind us all that that's been the balancing act all along. The key components of how we get from today to reaching that level in 27288 are the same. It is still a combination of gross margin and OPEX ratio, of which OPEX ratio will be the vast majority of that. And that's also why we keep talking about this operating leverage point and how we see this leveraging across our organization. Besides that, for today, Angel, I don't want to go further in detail on exactly how this will pan out. I think also where the focus has been in question so far, we will focus more on how we land today and how we show that gradual improvement in the EBIT margin with a continuous higher growth in EBIT than we see on the top line, what we are also expecting. For this year, if you adjust for both Terrigen and Out and FX, we will see a gradual improvement this year and we expect to continue to be able to deliver on that. On the ANPM side, if I turn to that, I think also a good question. I think obviously this year, the growth trajectory looks very different, but I want to remind you, if you go back and look across last year and this year, we're still actually solidly within our growth guidance of three to 5%, clearly a little bit lower than we have been on anesthesia, but solidly still within the guidance if you consider the price increases we've done and therefore, With what we know today and what we see, and back to Britt's point, the new product also particular for the neurology segment, we don't see any reason to change our view on the long-term growth trajectory for the NPM segment or business area with a 3% to 5% CAGR growth across the period.

Thanks, Henrik. That's very key. And just a quick follow up on margins and input cost inflation. I appreciate you won't be able to share much thoughts into next year. But just trying to understand, do any of your contracts include pass-through pricing or inflation clauses?

So today, I cannot comment on the specifics of all contracts, but typically there is not a direct one-to-one pass-through. And I also just want to remind us all that some of the cost inflation that I know a number of other companies are talking about is still not really that impactful for us, neither on plastic ration or silver prices or the like. So net of the external factors, it's still FX that's by far the single biggest impact here. And with that, I'm also really saying, Angel, that we have time sort of in our commercial model if we see a structural change in the underlying cost of a component or a raw material, that we can go out and change our contracts commercially. Because in many of our contracts, we have annual reviews of pricing where we have a chance to do that. in the ones that are longer than we typically manage and we can manage also with efficiencies in our operating setup. So net-net cost and facing still is not a big thing internally enough.

And that's very clear. Thanks, Henrik.

Thank you, Angel.

The next question from YAY Joe, SEB. Please go ahead.

Hi, it's Wei from ICB. Thank you for taking my question, or two from my side. I'll do one at a time. Firstly, I noticed that you highlighted the ASC potential for non-respiratory endoscopy portfolio. But to my knowledge, this is also a segment where the customers are more price sensitive. Is it fair to understand that you would be more willing to compromise your gross margin to pursue the growth? And what are the strategic priorities?

Thank you for that question, Wei. And it is true that we are looking at expansion into different segments and very much also are close to how the market is. Converting, where we are seeing that the market is converting with more and more procedures being done in the ASCs, the ambulatory centers. So therefore, I mean, that's a place that we are also playing. And we are playing a bit with our pricing in terms of some of these segments, but also with a very clear price flow. And this is also where I want to highlight that this is This is necessary to play in this segment, as you say, but when we look at our total pricing and how we look, we are still priced at a significant premium to our other single-use players, and also that some of these selected customers, I mean, we evaluate carefully how we use the price then to get volume, and this is worth noticing that when we look to the ASCs, we are very focused on where we see the high volumes and but we do see back to the trend that I mentioned that they are given more procedures are moving there. They are also looking for a more comprehensive portfolio where our ACE Group 5 system in some cases becomes attractive for them and you know that's a different price point. So it's very important to highlight that on the pricing we are very focused on avoiding dilution but more looking at the at keeping the price at a competitive level where we are again at a significant premium to the other players in the market.

Okay, that was clear. Thanks. Then my next question on assistoscope specifically. I know you have given some price concession due to the competition. Is it possible to quantify the gross margin impact here in Q3?

Thank you, Ray. So it is correct that we, as Britt just said, in selected markets, selected accounts, now we've talked about ACs, are doing sort of strategic pricing, i.e. slightly lower prices at a premium to competition, but still lower versus where we came from. We're not going to quantify exactly what that means across margin. I think, again, balancing back versus FX, FX has a bigger impact on this than these underlying trends. So I think if you look at the Overall picture, this is certainly something we're very focused on and extremely focused on in terms of the investments we're making in innovation and commercial execution to continue to differentiate ourselves. But we're not at the stage where we're seeing a wider price erosion at a bigger scale. We are more now focused on how do we continue to drive that differentiation also forward also for the segment and then Mindful that the segment split, which we also discussed in a previous session, I think in Q2, you asked the question where, what is the split between hospital and ASE or in Europe outpatient? Where, of course, when you go more in the outpatient or ASE segment, it is at a lower gross margin level than what you see in hospital, but not something that has a big effect at the group level.

Okay, thank you. If I may follow up on the gross margin. So if I understand correctly, you are expecting an improvement here in Q4. Could you name what will be the main drivers here?

Yes, of course. So it is correct. We are expecting an improvement. And as I said in my In my update on the EBIT margin, it is really a combination of the factors that we've talked about before. I think the first one is that we are expecting higher growth overall, and growth here also is a scale factor for the indirect production cost, so the fixed cost under gross margin for a factory. Higher growth in endoscopy, which again is a net better gross margin, and that will also explicitly be the case for Q4. And then, of course, I'm not referring to FX, but because we don't know where that will land exactly, that is the one open caveat which could push us one way or the other. But really, those two factors being the same as we talked about before are really what we expect to also see materializing Q4 and therefore with a higher gross margin as a net.

Okay, thank you. I will jump back to the queue.

Thank you.

The next question from Delphine Lelouet. Bernstein, please go ahead.

Hello, good morning, everybody. I'm very happy to see you, Lisa, here. Welcome. Two questions of my side, please. One dealing with the commercial and the commercial approach, I was willing to know What is new and specifically into the US in your commercial approach that you've been putting in place over the past six months that will start to be visible in the next semester? And the second question, because there is a lot of question mark here regarding this, let's say, bucket of investment cycle, but just slash capex. So just willing to know, how should we read the breakup Thank you for that and let Henrik comment on the CAPEX and break up. When it comes to the commercial approach that we have taken, what we communicated also last

Thank you very much. Thank you very much. When we spoke in early May in connection with our Q2, this was relatively new. I will say now, a couple of months later, this has actually gone very well and we see we have settled in adjusting to this very fast and we're continuing, of course, to practice on how we do that. But it's very much focusing on the decision makers where we are strengthening our approach and not just the The clinicians as a result of how the market is moving. And then we talked about also our patient settings where patients are increasingly being treated to make sure that we have a setup that addresses that.

So building on that, I just want to, and thank you for the good questions as always, Delphine. I just want to reiterate what I said also before. In a positive sense, we are able to attract really good commercial talent also in the US and therefore we have actually had a lot of people, good people coming on board. That's also some of the one-off onboarding costs that I referred to earlier in terms of commercial investments. That obviously gives us the, puts us in a position to then also accelerate our efforts into the market as Bert explained. In terms of the investments, and the rest of the year and into next year. I just want to make sure I split it in two. So obviously we're doing investments that are impacting our OPEX and investments that are impacting our CapEx. On the OPEX side, this is mainly investing in the commercial fuel ports. We are there, of course, we are the run rate level we are seeing now here in Q3 and which will be A S Ord, Jesper Johnsen Commercial fuel force investments have been a high focus of ours over the last 18 months. And in most countries, we're really now more doing smaller adjustments, not major adjustments. And therefore, we will continue to do those investments, but we are to a large now at a place where we're also more focused on making sure we scale the investments we've done at the right level in the right pace. Except for that, if we then turn on the CapEx side, which I also heard you ask about, I think we are still investing obviously significant in innovation. You will also see that our capitalization rate have gone up a little bit for the quarter to be very detailed, but this is more a matter of the maturity of our portfolio and the total level of spend we are continuing to put into innovation and that's still increasing Thank you very much. A S Ord, Jesper Johnsen Equipment training and obviously we're looking also at automation as we scale our manufacturing sites to a larger extent and with that also looking for better output efficiency.

And just a quick follow up on this one. Where are we in terms of the margin difference, gross margin difference in between Mexico and Malaysia?

So we're still at a place where you could say if you look at the landed cost of a product, excluding all tariffs, today there's 10% tariffs on products being imported from Malaysia to US, but even excluding that on a landing margin, i.e. if you improve production cost and the distribution cost to the customer, it's the same level for Mexico and Malaysia. Thank you.

This was the last question. I would like to turn the conference back over to Britt Meelby for any closing remarks. Thank you.

Thank you for that, Operator, and thank you to everyone for listening in on today's call and thanks in particular also for the very good questions.