Alpha Bank Sa

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I am Jota, your Chorus Call Operator. Welcome and thank you for joining the Alpha Services and Holdings Conference Call to present and discuss the nine-month 2024 financial results. All participants will be in a listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. Should anyone need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing star and zero on your telephone. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Alpha Services and Holdings Management. Gentlemen, you may now proceed.

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I am Iasson Kepapsoglou, Alpha Bank's head of IR. Vassilis Psaltis, our CEO, will lead the call today, summarizing our progress and giving you a few highlights. And then Vasilis Kosmas, our CFO, will give you more details on the quarter and the guidance. As ever, the whole team is here and we will take Q&A in the end and should finish within the hour. Vasilis, over to you.

Well, thank you, Eson, and good morning from my side as well. Thank you for joining. Let's dive in, starting now with slide number four, please. With one quarter left until the end of the year, we have delivered recurring earnings of $666 million, which translated into a 14.4% return on tangible equity and $0.26 of earnings per share for our shareholders. Our top line is resilient, with net interest income remaining strong whilst we continue making good progress in free income generation, supporting our solid management of operating leverage, and ensuring an improvement in provisions. We continue to grow our loan book and customer funds and to position the business to maximize the recurring value we can create for our shareholders in a sustainable way. Our capital buffers continue to grow steadily with 131 basis points of capital generation, reaching a level of 16.5% in the third quarter, including the impact from deconsolidating off of Romania. but that number goes up to 17.1% when accounting for the completion of other pending transactions. Please bear in mind that these numbers are net over 35% accrual for dividends out of 2024 profits, and this is up from the 20% accrual of 2023. It is important to note that we are also well ahead of the final binding emerald requirements. Given the marked progress we have made in the first nine months of the year, as you will later hear from our CFO Vasilis, we are upgrading guidance for the year. Relative to the most recent upgrade we made in August with our second quarter results, today's upgrade relates mainly to three things. Firstly, better net interest income. Secondly, lower provisioning expenses. And thirdly, stronger risk-weighted asset optimization. The combined output has allowed us to deliver higher recurring earnings, higher profitability, and a lower NPE ratio, whilst increasing our guidance for tangible book value and regulatory capital. But I think it is also worth highlighting that within the space of three quarters and versus the business plan we announced at the start of the year, we have been able to upsize our long-growth ambition We're delivering already this year the 2026 NPE targets, and we are five quarters ahead of plan in terms of capital and embryo, all whilst upsizing our ambition for earnings generation. Now, let's move on to slide five, please. There you can see that we have been and will continue to deliver a positive trajectory in earnings and capital. Here is a summary of the unique characteristics we possess and our strategic positioning that underpins our confidence in delivering in this promise of earnings growth and strong capital generation. Unlike many of our peers in Europe, we strongly believe we can continue to grow earnings, grow capital, and increase shareholder remuneration despite the interest rate headwinds. On this slide, you can see a summary of our unique characteristics that underpin this differentiated positioning. Let's look now at each in turn, starting on slide six. We have been diligent in ensuring that we manage our balance sheet dynamically with a view to maximize long-term value creation. At this juncture, this has meant ensuring that we were well positioned for the impeding decline in interest rates. Here, we're giving you full disclosure on the composition of our balance sheet, including the effect of hedging we have done, and our sensitivity to interest rates, assuming full repricing on a static balance. In absolute terms, we have a lower amount of core deposits versus sub-PS, we have a higher share of hedges, and have a lower net floating position of $4.7 billion. As you can see, at 12 million for every 25 basis points, this is at the lower end of the range for commercial European banks. Obviously, rates are not the only thing affecting our top line, and we expect a positive contribution from loan growth, reinvestments in our security book, and lower home funding costs, now that incremental funding issuance is less of a headwind. As Vasilis will explain later, we expect that our net interest income will be relatively resilient going forward. Growth in net interest income is largely predicated on loan growth, which is currently mostly driven by growth in corporate loans. And as you can see on slide seven, we have been able to move effectively in tandem with our peers over the medium term, slightly gaining market share. This quarter, we have seen very strong levels of growth, and we expect this trend to carry to the end of the year, beating our previous guidance for the year. As we have witnessed, Corporate loan growth then tends to be bumpy, given the long incubation period for investment loans to materialize, and this will create volatility in performance, but we expect to sustain good, strong momentum into 2025. What is more, we have been able to accomplish this growth whilst ensuring that we are diligent in our underwriting principles. We have seen spread pressure in the market, which comes as a function of lower funding costs, better visibility on the outlook, and improving credit rating of our clients. However, we continue to price risk adequately, and we have worked hard to ensure that we optimize capital consumption to ensure disbursements meet our profitability thresholds. Moving now to slide eight, our resilient top line is coupled with solid progress on fee income as we continue to lead in the asset management space and are making good progress in all other areas. There is significant room to grow in bank assurance, as well as in the payments and lending space. The 2026 number on this page is based on the business plan we announced with full year results back in March. We are planning to upgrade our ambition in the new planning cycle to reflect our fair share of wallet in certain segments, as well as new initiatives. Our partnership with Unicredit is providing tangible benefits for our customer, reinforcing our franchise, as you can see on slide 9. Earlier this week, we announced the closing of the transaction in Romania. Our private banking and affluent customers have already bought 150 million worth of funds from Unicredit's OneMarket, which is an offering that we have since our soft launch in July, while the official launch occurred in October. The joint venture in Banca's runs is expected to close in the first half of 2025, but we are already working closely with Unicredit in manufacturing Uniclin product with an AI-themed offering already launched in October. Our wholesale offering is also benefiting from our partnership, as we are already participating in relevant syndications. In addition, we are expanding our collaboration in trade finance guarantees and letter of credit, in clearing, in trading, treasury, factoring, as well as brokerage. We have also begun to pitch jointly for certain DCM deals and have done our inaugural deal on a big corporate as joint book runners. Our partnership with Unicredit gives us the opportunity to drive innovation in the grid market, to be exposed to international competition, and to put ourselves at the forefront of the European banking developments as a member of an extensive pan-European network. This is an opportunity that differentiates us from the rest of the pack, and we will fully utilize it to enhance the value that we create for the benefit of our shareholders. Turning now to slide 10. Other than 2024 that Vassilis will discuss shortly, we are not providing a detailed update to guidance today. This will come with our full year results. But allow me to reaffirm our commitment to growing our bottom line in the coming years. Our conviction is built upon the structural advantages I just discussed. Our top line is resilient as a lower sensitivity to falling interest rate is combined with specific tailwinds from loan growth, securities reinvestment and lower funding costs. We are making sure that we are growing our loan book profitably and are diversifying our revenue streams by expanding our fee generation capabilities. Growing earnings and improving profitability is not an easy feat given the headwinds we expect from falling interest rates. But as I have explained already, a lot of work has already been done to give us the confidence in our ability to deliver on these promises. Slide 11. Improving earnings and profitability will translate into strong capital generation. We have a solid starting point on this, both in terms of regulatory capital as well as in terms of MREL, which means we have less headwinds from incremental issuance as we have already optimized the capital stack. Comfortable buffers against regulatory capital and MREL and the penal plan distributions. Subject to regulatory approval, we expect to distribute more than 30% of the current market cap in dividends, and at the end of the period, still have more than 40% of the current market cap in excess of the capital that we need versus our management targets. The forward achievement of a 17.1 core equity tier one ratio, which stands strongly not just in a Greek, but also in a European context. The fact that we have comfortable emerald buffers The sustainable above 40% return on tangible equity, organic profitability, and the decisive dealing with the last small tail of NPEs to achieve our target to have our ratio diving under 4% means we are comfortable and confident about this year target for dividends and also increase our ability to beat the target of a cumulative over three year payout of 1.1 billion to our shareholders. Slide 12. I hope that all the above further explain why we feel so strongly about the buyback we have initiated back in August. We expect to have superior earnings growth in the coming years that will lead to significant capital generation. And now, from one Vasilis to the other, Vasilis, the floor is yours.

Thank you, Vasilis. Let's start with quarterly results and we'll end up with the guidance upgrade and a few words on DTCs. So slide 14, please. Before we delve into the details, allow me to point out the few one-off items in the quarter that get lumped into one line. The biggest one was a 31 million provision for the voluntary separation scheme we announced. It relates to just over 450 full-time employees, and the payback period is just under three years. You will see a small top-up of this provision, less than 10 million million euros in q4 as we finalize the number of participants and which option they opt for in terms of immediate exit or sabbatical leave we also took a further 18 million provision for np transaction which mainly relates to the recent np transaction and then we also had a further 18 million contribution from from romania under discontinued operations as of earlier this week This is now gone, so you should expect to see the contribution from our retained 10% stake in recurring income from associates. Next slide on main P&L items. Operating income has grown, both in the quarter and versus last year, and our net interest income has remained largely flat, with the contribution from fees continuing to grow healthy. Costs continue to be impacted by higher depreciation, And we're also working on a higher base for staff costs following the one-off rebasing of staff wages earlier this year, as well as the earlier negotiation of the collective agreement. General and administrative expenses for the quarter have been lower due to marketing expenses. All in all, however, things are going according to plan. We'll talk about impairments on a later slide, but I think it's clear that we continue to face a benign environment when it comes to asset quality. Lastly, on the bottom line, reported profit at 167 million euros, despite the one-offs and normalized profits up 7% on quarter to quarter basis at 229 million, which is a record quarter for normalized profits. On the next slide, we see trends for the main balance sheet items. Performing loans were up 3% in the quarter and were running at 8% year on year. Customer funds also up 3% in the quarter, with solid trends in both deposits and AUMs, and a total of 10% year-on-year. Tangible book value was up 1% in the quarter, but once we add back the $61 million cash dividend paid in the amount spent on the buyback, growth was actually 3% in the quarter. And finally, the highlight for the quarter, capital. up to 16.5% in terms of CT1, adding 170 basis points in Q3, including the deconsolidation of Alpha Bank Romania, with another 60 basis points to come from the completion of remaining transactions, now sitting well above our stated 16% target. Let's turn to slide 17, where we show two main components of revenues. Net interest income was basic flat in the quarter. Keep in mind there's a 4 million benefit here from a higher number of days quarter on quarter. The biggest impact of course came from lower rates as we see that flittering through our loan book. Volumes as you can imagine given the quiet summer months came relatively late in the quarter. So we're going to see more of a meaningful impact from loans in Q4. On deposit costs, a mixed picture. Lower rates have just started to reduce the cost of deposits, but clearly that has been offset this quarter by higher volumes. Moving to the non-commercial side, the contribution from bonds continues to grow as expected, coming both from higher volumes and better rates on reinvestments, as per our guidance. On the liability side, there is lower ECB and repo funding, stemming mostly from lower use of repo lines as a result of higher deposit inflow, as discussed. On the fee and commission side, a very strong quarter with good levels across categories. Higher disbursements have driven the resumption of growth in business credit-related fees. On asset management business, fees continue to grow, even though we have already met the budget for AUMs this year. So there were less transaction-related fees this quarter on account of lower sales. Cards and payments, Q3 always are seasonally stronger. But I think we also see some healthy underlying trends here if one compares the actual performance versus a year ago. Last but not least, a good quarter on back assurance where we expect growth going forward. Going to slide 18 to discuss performing loans and customer funds. Performing loans saw a $1.2 billion of net credit expansion in the quarter on account of a steep increase in disbursements for corporates. This follows the usual pattern we have described in the past, with growth in corporates being significant, 10% year-on-year in our case. Be a bit worried of the annual growth rate for corporates as most of the growth last year came in Q4. We do expect, however, to carry this strength to the end of the year, beating our previous guidance for the year, and expect sustained good momentum into 2025. Also important to note for our retail business, although mortgage lending is still in negative territory, both consumer lending and now also small business lending have turned the corner. Numbers are not large, about 150 million of net credit expansion combined for the two, but it does mean that the retail book is now year-to-date just about growing, even though individuals are basically flat. On customer funds, we've seen an influx of deposits this quarter. The vast majority relates to business deposits. Retail deposits are also up in the quarter, while we also see a good increase in AUM balances. About half of paid sales in the quarter actually came from core deposits in the bank. So the trends of customers preferring to move into asset management products instead of time deposits continues. The relevant chart has been relegated to the appendix showing that time deposits stand at 25% of the total in Greece for a fifth consecutive quarter. Slide 19 on asset quality. Small reduction in the NPE ratio now down to 4.6 on account of growth in the denominator, as NPE flows are persistently around zero. Our coverage increased further by one percentage point, now at 48%. Cost of risk at 63 basis points year-to-date and 58 this quarter. I want to draw your attention to the note on the top right-hand side, showing that we expect to reduce NPEs to below 4% by year-end. This inorganic action refers to a portfolio about half the size of what we did in Q2, so circa $250 million instead of $500. And you should expect a bit less than half of that $100 million cost that we booked in Q2. Last on results, slide 20 on capital. So far this year, we have generated 130 base points of capital organically. P&L is contributing just over 200 basis points, DTA recovering adding a bit over 50. DTCs so far have cost us 120 million euros, while growth in RWAs practically reflecting growth in loans consuming just under 80 basis points. 81 coupon payments were now done for the year, another 14 basis points. NP transactions have consumed part of the organic capital generation, just under 50 base points, to be exact. But we continue to work on optimizing our usage of capital and our WA consumption. And this quarter, we have seen a benefit from the introduction of external ratings in our model, fully reversing the impact of NP transactions. With that, let's turn to slide 21 to talk about the 2024 guidance upgrade. The numbers are on the page, so let me quickly walk you through the drivers. Upgrade to revenue comes from net interest income, which we now expect to be flat this year. There's two drivers versus the upgrade we gave you in August. One, deposit mix continues to surprise positively, and we now expect to end the year where we currently stand, so below the 29% we gave you in August. To some extent, performing loan balances will be higher than previously expected. Now, given the inorganic work we've done in MPEs, this isn't fully reflective of net loans, which is what we gave guidance on. But we look at net credit expansion. We now expect to land at circa 2 billion for 2024. Second point worth mentioning is that we see cost of risk landing lower at circa 65 basis points. We've given you some color on the transaction we expect to see in Q4. And to be clear, that's a separate thing. What we're talking about here is trends in underlying cost of risk, which have been better than expected. With cost of risk at 63 basis points year-to-date, the 65 suggests small uptick, which reflects the usual cleanup we see in Q4. And lastly, on capital, clearly we have over-delivered on this from year-to-date and versus our business plan. We are at 16.5, and we have already locked in the benefits from the deconsolidation of the Romanian RWAs. Partly offsetting, we still expect to see healthy long growth in Q4 to get to the net credit expansion number I just mentioned. And that's a natural headwind for capital. Turning to page 22 and recognizing the importance of net interest income for the medium-term outlook, I would like to give you a first glimpse of what we're thinking about next year. We're currently in the process of finalizing our budget for next year and the business plan for the next three years. that we will present to you for the full year results. But given the large dispersion we see in market estimates for 2025, ranging from 1.4 billion to 1.7, we thought it's helpful to give you some color on the subject. Bottom line is that we don't expect to go lower than the level since in 2023 and 2024. This is pretty much in line with the guidance with full year results back in March. where 2025 NII was flat on 2023. So let's see how the main components have evolved. Ageing to 2025 will be lower. We previously expected three months URI board to land at on average at 2.6 in 2025, whereas current forward curves suggest a lower level. We've given clear guidance on our NII sensitivity to interest rates. So you can use that as a reference to the impact on NII, which in any case is relatively small. Remember also that our sensitivity to interest rates has come down. Loan volumes are evolving better than planned this year, as mentioned, which means we will end 2025 with a higher balance, and we don't expect to see changes in 2025 in net credit expansion compared to what we've had in our platform before. Deposit volumes are also evolving largely in line with expectations, so we don't expect to see much divergence here. But we've seen a slower transition to time deposits, meaning that the deposit cost of funding has been better than expected. On wholesale funding volumes, we're pretty much done in terms of EMRL. We've stated that we want to build a buffer on top, so something small is still expected. Wholesale funding spreads, however, have seen significant compression, as evidenced by the 81 we issued in September at just 7.5%. So there might be a tailwind for refinancing of existing instruments. Loan spreads have been under pressure, reflecting funding cost benefits for the system and the improvement in credit quality and capital consumption through RWA optimization. We've actually seen the majority of what we expect in the horizon within the first nine months of 2024. Last but not least, our securities book has grown a bit less than we expected, but the main tailwind for us in 2025 comes from reinvestment of securities, Albeit the short end of the curve has come down. Longer term expectations have not shifted materially, so we remain confident that we can deliver the anticipated yield pickup. Appreciate that doesn't provide you with a numerical breakdown, but that will come with full year results and the updated guidance for the next few years that we're currently working on. So it's a bit premature to give you numbers, but hopefully the color we have provided gives you an idea about our confidence in the evolution of our top line. Turning to slide 23, last to touch on the hot topic of deferred tax credits, you've heard all this from our peers, so nothing groundbreaking here. We do intend to reduce the dependence of regulatory capital on disease in an accelerated manner. Compared to the current position, what you will see in practice starting from 2025 is that for every, say, 100 euros of distributions, be it cash dividend or a buyback, will reduce the stock of DTCs by 29 euros on a regulatory balance sheet. Accounting treatment remains unaffected, so the deferred tax assets underneath these regulatory deferred tax credits will still be there, waiting to be recovered in the following years. There's no impact from this on the P&L, nor on our equity. In practice, the acceleration of DTC amortization will reduce annual capital generation by circa 40 basis points. Assuming that we stick with a 50% payout without factoring any growth in profits and still factoring 5% growth in RWAs, DTCs will get to 24% of CET1 by 2027 and zero by 2023. In this illustrative scenario, our capital ratios would continue to expand and we would have no need for issuance of incremental 81, tier 2, or senior preferred instruments. Every 10 percentage points increase in payout ratio would bring forward the elimination of the disease from regulatory capital, where CT1 would still be expanding, even with a 70% payout ratio. There will be no meaningful incremental emerald issuance needs, even under high payouts to the tune of 70%. With that, let's now turn the floor to questions.

Ladies and gentlemen, at this time we will begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star followed by one on their telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, then you may press star and two. Please use your handset when asking your question for better quality. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. One moment for the first question, please. The first question comes from the line of Ismailu Eleni with Axia Ventures. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and congratulations for this strong set of results. I just have a couple of questions from my side. The first one is if you could please confirm the outlook for payouts for this year and the next, given the BTC amortization. And the second question would be, what is the 35% payout ratio based on? Is it on reported or normalized profits?

I'll take the second one, technical question, and Vasilis will answer the first. I think the easiest way to answer this is that we've accrued $210 million in our capital base for dividends this year. I appreciate there might be some confusion in how people calculate normalized and recurring earnings, but that will give you a very good basis upon which you can understand how the ratio is calculated.

Eleni, on your first question, I think we always need to bear in mind that the dividend is a derivative of many things. In our case, we were quite focused on ensuring that we're going to be soaring our capital at levels, at the best possible levels. And I think it is indeed a very strong performance that we managed to bring it forward by five quarters. The performance 17.1 core equity tier one ratio is a testament to that. On the same vein is also the sheer fact that we have been able to front load also the achievement of the Emerald target. If anything, that gives us now confidence to play the curve to our benefit. The second driver which always comes into this discussion is obviously the sustainable profitability is not just what you achieve in one year is what is being deemed as sustainable. And I think in this relatively. I mean, given that we have a significantly less windfall in this environment that we have been into and the way that our balance sheet is structured that gives us significant underpinning hedging towards a low interest rate environment, I think it is clear that we can state that we are looking forward towards a sustainable above 14% profitability. So that's the second driver. Now, as a third one is any contingent issues that you may face. And I think by saying upfrontly that we now intend to bring forward by practically two years our NPE target and conclude the inorganic by coming lower to 4% by the end of the year, we iron that out as well. So I think these three... areas we demonstrate strong performance and that allows us to make a statement that we have indeed an increased ability to beat the target vis-a-vis the cumulative three-year payout of 1.1 billion that we have put. So obviously subject to our discussions with the regulator at this stage what I want really to emphasize is how strong and comfortable we feel entering that discussion.

This is very clear. Thanks for your answer.

The next question comes from the line of Kemeny Kabor with Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.

Hello. A couple of questions for me, please. The first one is on your upgraded NII guidance, the 2025 guidance, I mean. Can you give us a sense of how you think about loan growth here? Because you seem to be quoting the strong 2024 starting base, and I believe you were expecting something like a 2 billion net credit expansion at the start of the year as well. Also related to that topic, I mean, a nice pickup in loan growth in the third quarter, Can you give us a sense how concentrated the new corporate demand has been? Is it a few corporate tickets or are they broader, and how does the pipeline look from a concentration perspective? And my final question is also on NII, on the rate sensitivity, the 12 million rate sensitivity Well, firstly, can you give us an update on the hedge parameters, please? And the other one is at what rate level do you think that your sensitivity would increase? How far would euro rates have to drop for your sensitivity to increase from the 12 million? Thank you.

Thank you, Gabor. Let me pick these one by one. On the loan growth, you rightly point out that our estimate for the year is roundabout 2 billion. This is roughly higher than we expected at the beginning of the year, given this is a number that refers to net additions rather than net loans. Remember, net loans during the year have delivered if you like, for the very fact of the NP transactions that we have accelerated. So, you know, we feel very firm about 2024. When it comes to 2025, I think it's well known in the market that a couple of lumpy deals came in the last quarter of 2024, but still that doesn't change our ambition for 2025 at all. pretty much similar levels. When it comes to Q3 performance on loan growth and how concentrated that was, There have been a couple of lumpy deals, but overall, I wouldn't say this has been concentrated. You know, this one point two billion you see has been concentrated on four or five clients. It's mostly as it was always being corporate credits, but it's it's widespread across industries and clients. And as mentioned, a bit more. that we see in small business, which helps diversify a bit the mix. And then on NII, I think you asked, what is the rate that this 12 million sensitivity increases? It's 1.5 is the answer, 1.5%. So if rates go below 1.5, that's when the 12 million sensitivity starts to grow. And then what is driven, this is on the hedge parameter, what drives this sensitivity is primarily the fact that we have been actively hedging our non-mature deposits. This was a number around about 44, 45% a couple of years ago. And gradually until first quarter, after first quarter last year, this number has grown to 84%. So currently, 84% of our non-mature deposits are heads with fixed rate assets or receivables. Hence, you see this 4.7 billion gap between floating rate assets and floating rate liabilities.

That's very helpful, Kader. Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Sevid. Mehmet with JP Morgan, please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks very much for the presentation. I know you already outlined your views on that and specifically I'm asking on capital return with cities and, you know, the drivers that you mentioned are all very clear and well understood. But if I look at your capital, it's improved a lot better than initially expected. You've also further optimized it with the 81. The business plan is looking much better. And some of your pre's already talked about some higher capital return for this year already. Could I just ask what is stopping you at this stage to maybe upgrade your dividend payout assumption taking all of these also into consideration. Is there something that is stopping you or is this simply, you know, how things work and it will take simply a bit more time if it happens? And my second question would also be on the MPEs or the NPA transaction cost that you took this quarter. Could I just clarify, is this related to the upcoming potential transaction that will get you to 4%? or is that more backward-looking for something that happened earlier? Thanks very much.

Just to get the second question out of the way, it has to do with previous transactions, as Vasilis mentioned in his speaking. So that $8 million refers to the past, not the future.

But I think we have given guidance, if one would turn the analogy, isn't it? But let me, Mehmet, come back to the first question. And I think there are two things there. The first is that as far as our intention, I think it was unequivocal what I said. We are striving for that. Now, the second point is a matter of tone. You see, there are banks that, you know, are coming forward, knowing full well that there is a discussion coming up with the regulator about and they want to stretch the tone. There are other bands like ourselves that, you know, we pay duties to this dialogue. And we want to speak about what we intend to do And that's as far as we should get. We don't want really to paternalize our counterparts in this discussion because they have a much stronger hand as well. So we are very conscious of that. We're very humble in the way that we treat that. And this is the way we appear in the public domain as well.

That's super clear. Thank you. And if I may just follow up on that, I think the closing remarks of your CFO was that your MREL would still be met if you were to get to a 70% payout. I don't want to push it too much, but is this something, if everything allows it, that we could potentially expect from you in the outer years if everything goes according to plan?

We want to give you the technical points that you see what are the outer boundaries of a dialogue.

Okay. Thanks very much.

The next question comes from the line of Gerardo Luis with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you. A couple of questions for me. First, coming back to that discussion on capital and technology, Can you give us an updated sense of how quickly you would expect to reduce your CT1 ratio towards that 13% target? I mean, how relevant is that in your planning, given the good profitability you have, and how do you think that's going to interact with the new ratio to maintain your MREL buffer? And secondly, just sorry, a little bit detailed on slide 79. Can you remind us what that other MREL eligible liabilities actually refer to? And do you expect this to still qualify as MREL once there is full deposit preference in the EU? Thank you.

I'll take the second question. The emerald eligible liabilities that we have that are not senior preferred notes that we have issued would not be affected by a change in the legislation with regards to deposit or preference. And actually, we have here with us Lazaros Papagarifalou, our deputy CEO. who was actually part of the CFO team when we published the previous business plan explaining how CET1 ratio will evolve going forward. So maybe, Lazar, you can take the question of how and if and when we can get to a 13% CET1 ratio. Hello, good afternoon.

To start with, the management target at 13% also takes into account the fact that we have fully issued the 81 bucket at one billion euro. That is one thing. Then indeed we have portrayed evolution of capital ratios showing how common equity one and total cut will unfold in the coming years supporting both the re-leveraging of the balance sheet through loan growth and other asset growth as well as support the payouts that we have portrayed in our plan. Still, after asset growth and payouts, we are left with a significant amount of excess equity, which as portrayed on various occasions, amounts approximately to 40% of our existing market cap. This excess capital that we portray in the planning horizon implies that we have more strategic flexibility, to grow our asset base organically, but also through targeted add-ons in case organic opportunities come our way, or improve payouts and buybacks, which is part of our thinking. You see the bank that has introduced buybacks recently, the first bank to start splitting the buyback the payout in a buyback and a cash dividend. Obviously, this is a tool that we want to employ going forward in terms of quantum. So as Vasily said, this is an ongoing dialogue with the regulator. Getting to higher payouts or exploiting opportunities that come our way is a way really to use our capital buffers to the benefit of our shareholders.

Thank you very much.

The next question comes from the line of Putkov Michael with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Good day. Thank you very much for the presentation. Just wanted to follow up on the recent H1 issuance. Was this capital optimization done as a matter of better ability to increase the dividend payout later and to have or what was the other motivations behind the recent issuance and then also Given the difference in the coupon rate in your two A21s, when would you may consider the lower of the previous issuance maybe at the lower rates? Thank you very much.

I'll take the second question. on the previous 81. The first call date is early 28. So I think we have quite some time to go until then. And obviously in any case, that's an economic decision we would need to make at that point when we would have that option.

And the first question on why we have progressed with 81 issuance is connected with my previous answer. We put leverage in the capital structure so as to operate through the cycle with the common equity one at 13% and increase payouts, which is our ultimate target. I think most banks in Europe are optimizing their capital stack by using both tier two and 81 and thus pursuing the best optimal mix in the capital structure with a view to optimize payouts as well.

Okay, thank you very much. That is very clear.

Once again, to register for a question, please press star and one on your telephone. The next question comes from the line of Memisoglos, man with Abrogia Capital. Please go ahead.

Hello, many thanks for this and congrats on the... Strong results. Just following up on a few things I may have missed. The $210 million accrual, is that for nine months for payout or full year? That's the first clarification, if you could. And then on the MPE side, you're going to go below 4% with another transaction in Q4, and there will be further MPE cleanup provisions? I wasn't clear about that. Thank you.

Our CFO Vasilis will take both.

So for the first one, the 210 million that you mentioned is the accrual we have taken for the nine month. So there's a bit more to take for the last quarter. Then with regards to the last leg of this NP transaction, what we mentioned is this is another 250 million gross book value that we will be deleveraging. Given that last quarter we took a hit of roughly 100 million on a half a billion book, I think we're guiding towards a similar ratio for the last quarter. Hopefully that makes sense.

Yes, that's very helpful. And qualitatively, should we expect inorganic actions on the MPE side to continue or are we getting close to the end of this? in 2025?

Well, the tricky one too. I mean, we were aiming for the horizon for the end of 2025 to be at this at the rate we will be a year ahead of time. We're very happy achieving this target ahead of time. Whether we proceed with more action, we need to keep a bit of, to be a bit opportunistic in the sense that there are cases where the lost budget for these transactions makes sense because you effectively decrease the cost of risk going forward. So if there are opportunities in 2025, we will take them, but we'll remain opportunistic on the matter.

Okay. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the conference over to management for any closing comments. Thank you.

Well, a warm thank you for your participation at the nine-month results call, and we're looking forward to welcoming you again on our full year results towards the end of February next year. Thank you very much.