Erste Group Bank Ag S/Adr

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Airsta Group third quarter 2025 results conference call. I am Sandra, the course call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants have been listened to in remote and the conference has been recorded. The presentation will be followed by a Q&A session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Thomas Sommerauer, Head of the Group of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you very much, Sandra, for the kind introduction and also a warm welcome from my end to this third quarter conference call of Erste Group. We follow our usual procedure according to which Peter Bossek, our executive officer, Stefan Dörfler, our chief financial officer, and Alexander Haveler-Travik, our chief risk officer, will lead you through a brief presentation highlighting the financial achievements of the third quarter and here today, after which time we will be ready to take your questions. Before I hand over to Peter Bossek, the usual presentation, highlighting of the disclaimer on page two in regard to forward-looking statements. With this, I hand over to Peter.

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome again to our third quarter 2025 conference call. Let me place two messages right at the start. First, we are progressing well towards first-time consolidation of Santander Polska around here in 2025. We received all competition authority approvals And it's our current expectation that we will get the nod of the Polish regulator K&F by year end. The integration work streams with our future colleagues are also right on track. S is our capital build. Actually, it's progressing even better than we have planned. And this brings me right to my second message. And this is our existing business is doing exceptionally well. We benefit from strong volume growth. dynamics across our region, which translates into healthy top-line performance and good bottom-line profitability. And if you add these two things up, the strength of our existing business and the integration of a leading bank in the largest CE market, Erste will become a real powerhouse in CE banking with an unrivaled profitability and growth profile. And while it's unlikely that we hit the 4 billion profit mark in 2026 on a reported basis due to the booking of customary one-time items that have to be absorbed with first-time consolidation of such transaction, this doesn't change anything in our ambition to get there on a clean basis already in 2026. Such one-time items include purely technical and overtime P&L neutral IFRS effects, such as the measurement of acquired assets at fair value and the resulting immediate recognition of expected credit losses on the newly acquired portfolio. And certainly also one of integration costs, which we still see around 200 million euros. With this, let me highlight a couple of points of our third quarter performance. For the first time ever, we posted quarterly revenues north of 2.9 billion euros. This resulted from a record net interest income of close to 2 billion euros, supported by strong loan growth, a stable interest rate environment, and continued deposit pricing strings. In addition, we printed fees of almost 800 million euros, also a quarterly record. On the cost side, we probably could have done a touch better, but this is definitely an area where we still have a potential going into the fourth quarter. But despite elevated costs, quarterly operating profit was also in record territory by a comfortable margin. Risk costs remained moderate and we are fully in line with our guidance. And we again benefited from a positive warm-off in the other operating result, despite higher banking taxes. Altogether, we achieved an excellent return on tangible equity of 18% flat in the third quarter. Based on these numbers, we slightly tweaked our 2025 guidance. We now see net interest income growing by more than 2% instead of more than 0%. And consequently, we rather see the cost-income ratio at around 48% instead of below 50%. Furthermore, we are raising our year-end CRT1 ratio projection to higher than 18.5% due to continued strong capital build in the case first-time consolidation has not happened by this time. All other 25 guidance items, most of which were already upgraded a quarter ago, are hereby confirmed. When analyzing our P&L metrics, I'm on page five in the meantime, we see continued net interest margin recovery. This was not necessarily driven by an expansion of product spreads, but rather by the factors I already mentioned, like higher NII on back of loan growth. and strong deposit pricing power, in addition to still muted interest-bearing asset inflation. The latter was supported by limited growth in financial assets and interbank assets in the past quarter. Operating efficiency also remained at a sound level, just shy of 47%, as did risk costs at somewhat above 20 basis points. Banking taxes went up in the past quarter due to a doubling of the tax rate in Romania starting in July. Quarterly earnings per share also rose despite reported net profit being down slightly quarter on quarter due to the non-deduction of ATR1 dividends in the third quarter. The same effects also explain the rise of the in-return on tangible equity to 80%. I don't want to sound repetitive, but clearly what had positive effects in our P&L is also reflected in the year-to-date balance sheet development. On page six, you can see the main driver of asset-side growth was higher customer loan volumes. In fact, since the start of the year, added almost 10 billion euros to our loan stock. Stefan will tell you more where it exactly came from later. So for now, I will only say that the positive trends of the previous quarters, good growth across Central and Eastern Europe, and solid growth in Austria and better growth in retail and corporate business continued in the third quarter. Total customer deposits grew by 2.5 year to date, while core retail and SME deposits, which includes deposits held in the savings banks, increased by 2.4% over the same timeframe. The retail segment on its own saw deposit growth by 3.5 since the start of the year. All in all, we are seeing healthy volume growth for the past couple of quarters now, and the third quarter was no exception. So this increasing looks like a sustainable trend. This makes us confident that we will comfortably deliver our full year guidance of growing customer loans by more than 5%. Looking at the same balance sheet metrics on slide seven, my key message to you is that all of them are pretty much in a sweet spot territory. The loan to deposit ratio stands at 92%. Here, we saw a little bit of an uptick since the start of the year due to strong loan growth dynamics and compared to that, somewhat slower growth in deposits. The asset quality backdrop remained excellent in the third quarter. with a stable MPL ratio of 2.5 and unchanged coverage versus the previous quarter of about 74%. Importantly, the asset quality situation in Austria remains stable despite the weak economic backdrop. The activity across Central and Eastern Europe remained very strong and the Czech Republic and Hungary doing particularly well.

As usual, Alexandra will provide you further details on creative research. Our capital position continued to expand in the run-up for the first time consolidation of a Polish acquisition, expected for around year end of 2025.

On a performer basis, we added another 74 basis points to our CRT1 ratio in the third quarter, which now stands at 18.2%. Quarterly profit inclusion, the lack of any dividend accrual, and the first positive impact from securitization were key drivers of this strong print. While the lower left-hand chart on the slide shows the reported CRT1 number, where third quarter profit is not included due to not being audited or previewed. And with this, let's now examine the macroeconomic environment and in particular the outlook for 2026. I'm on slide nine now. In the past quarter, we saw continuation of geopolitical and trade tensions which prolonged the weakness of German industry. The fiscal spending plans announced in spring of this year didn't yet show any noticeable positive effect to date other than a slight improvement in sentiment. Accordingly, the German economy is expected to flatline in 2025. Due to these and necessary fiscal consultation measures, the Austrian economy also struggled to produce growth. The situation was different in Central and Eastern Europe, where moderate growth in the range of 1 to 3% is expected in 2025. And I would like to highlight the good economic performance of the Czech Republic in this context, which is still our most important CE market. A key pillar of strength was the healthy labor market across our region, and that includes Austria. Consumer price inflation remained relatively elevated in our region, impacted by high energy prices, but also good domestic demand. Fiscal and external balances were mixed, with once again the Czech Republic standing out in terms of fiscal prudence and a positive external balance. When looking forward to 2026, current forecasts project higher growth rates in most of our markets and adverse to stable growth performance. Consumer price inflation should ease somewhat and the labor markets are expected to remain in good shape. Fiscal deficits should improve, especially in Romania, and overall indebtedness should also remain at sustainable levels. This is an environment that works well for us and should ensure that we will continue to grow profitably in 2026, despite all uncertainties that unfortunately more than ever are a feature of doing business. Despite the mixed macro backdrop, retail business continued to do very well in the third quarter. I'm on page 10 now. We saw balanced growth in retail loans with housing and consumer finance contributing to growth in equal measure. both rising in higher single digits year-on-year. Asset quality remains stable at low levels. When it comes to retail liability, deposits also grew by a significant 6.4 year-on-year, mainly due to the increase in current account and savings deposits, while term deposits were down year-on-year as well as quarter-on-quarter, in line with trends we have already observed for a couple of quarters now. From the bank's point of view, this trend is positive as the shift towards lower price deposits decreased funding costs and supports net interest income. But the good news don't stop here. We also saw continuous growth in off-balance sheet customer funds, security savings plans that enable customers to build long-term wealth in an easy-to-manage digital format, topped 1.9 million at the end of the third quarter, and they have generated gross fund sales in excess of 1.1 billion euros year-to-date. George, our digital platform for retail clients, continued on its growth path. The number of onboarded users reached 11.2 million in the third quarter, and the digital sales ratio in the retail business equaled 65.8. Going forward, our ambition is unchanged to develop George into a fully fledged financial advisor in order to give even larger parts of our client population access to high quality financial advice. In the corporate segment, I'm on page 11 already. Loans were up 6.9% year on year and 1.3% quarter on quarter. Growth was well distributed among all four business lines in the third quarter, while year on year, the large corporate business made the best contribution, expanding by 10.4%. In terms of products, there was definitely more demand for investment loans than in the third quarter. while year on year there was a good balance between investments and working capital loans. The markets business built on its strong start in 2025 with our ECM and TCM teams, successfully executing 236 transactions with an issuance volume of 173 billion year-to-date. In asset management business, we reached a historical milestone in the third quarter with assets under management topping 100 billion euros for the first time ever. This achievement will support future fee growth. And with that, I hand over to Stefan for the presentation of the quarterly operating trends.

Thanks very much, Peter, and also a warm welcome to this call from my side. Please follow me to page 13. When analyzing the loan volume performance by country, I would also single out the check business in the same way as Peter did in the context of macro. Not only is it our largest and most profitable marketing center in Europe, but it is also the most consistent performer when it comes to loan growth. In the third quarter, we continued to see growth across the board there. Demand was strong across all product categories, with good balance between investment loans and working capital facilities in the corporate business, while mortgages continued to lead the way in the retail space with annual growth in the mid-teens. Mortgages were also the key growth driver in Slovakia, increasing by almost 10% year on year. Corporate loan demand was heavily tilted towards working capital facilities there. In Hungary, the retail business clearly outperformed the corporate business, with both mortgages and consumer loans growing in the mid-teens year on year. Please bear in mind that Euro growth rates are somewhat flattered by the strong appreciation of Hungarian forint over the past months, But even when adjusting for this, retail growth was really strong. In Croatia, the development was similar to that in Hungary, with growth being better in retail and in corporate business. And within retail, mortgages were ahead. So when we said in July that mortgage lending in centuries in Europe is back, third quarter data provides further evidence that this trend is strong and has legs. In our Austrian retail and SME operations, Erste Bank Österreich and the savings banks, volume growth is slowly but surely approaching the mid single digits. Actually not bad, given the lackluster economic backdrop. Interestingly, growth was somewhat better in the corporate business than in retail, with especially good demand for investment loans. Given the strong loan growth year to date, we feel very comfortable with our greater than 5% guidance for 2025. On the liability side, see page 14, the trends we have observed for the past couple of quarters also continued in the third quarter of 2025. Importantly, the favorable structural shift in our vast retail deposit base of almost 170 billion euros from term deposits back to current account deposits and savings accounts, or put differently, from the most expensive to cheaper retail deposits showed no signs of slowing. A similar trend was visible in the corporate business with overnight deposits increasing while term deposits declined year on year. Consequently, the cost of deposits has declined to the lowest level in almost three years with corresponding positive read across to net interest income as we will see shortly. In terms of total deposit volumes, we are up 3.4% year on year and flat compared to the second quarter. Growth was driven by core retail, SME and savings banks deposits. up 5.2% over the past 12 months, while deposits in the corporate segment flatlined over the same period, due in particular to offsetting volatility in the large corporate and public sector subsegments. In terms of geographic segment highlights, annual growth was satisfactory across the retail and SME businesses in Austria and Central and Eastern Europe. while the year-on-year decline in the other Austria segment was entirely attributable to lower non-core financial institution deposits. Let me now move to net interest income on page 15. We have already talked about many NRI drivers, be it strong loan growth, lower cost of deposits, or a stabilization in the interest rate environment. Add to that a steepening of yield curves, allowing for better reinvestment opportunities, and tighter funding spreads. and you have all ingredients for posting record quarterly net interest income. Record NRI of close to 2 billion euros, in fact, up 3.7% year on year, and also up 3.1% quarter on quarter. Net interest margin also edged up quarter on quarter, thanks to a muted increase in interest-bearing assets on the back of lower interbank business volumes. In terms of geographic highlights, net interest income at the Austrian retail and SME business continued to stabilize on the back of significant downward repricing of deposits, while downward repricing of variable rate loans came almost to a standstill. In Czech Republic and Slovakia, continued deposit repricing also had a positive impact, year on year compounded by the continued upward repricing of mortgage loans due to refixations at higher levels. The other segment, which includes holding asset liability management operations, benefited from higher income, mainly from government bond investments. And the final comment on NRI. Our sensitivity to rate cuts is more or less unchanged at about or even slightly below 200 million euros for a 100 basis point instant downward rate shock, with the bulk of the impact expected at the minority-owned savings banks. So no big deal for shareholders. As a result of all of this, we are upgrading again our 2025 outlook for net interest income from previously growth of higher than 0% to growth of higher than 2%. Flipping to fees on page 16 and then onto a blockbuster fee quarter. Net fee income rose by a massive 8.6% year-on-year and increased by 4.8% quarter-on-quarter. With this, we set a new quarterly record of almost 800 million euros. In terms of gross drivers, the story is by and large unchanged. Year-on-year fees generated by payment services and securities business led the way, even though the increase in payment fees is understated by the shift of loan account fees from payment to lending as of first quarter 2025. I would not like to highlight individual countries in this context, as we saw encouraging trends across the board, but rather add a comment to the Austrian

other Austria segment.

In addition to good asset management sales, the year-on-year jump there is also explained by the integration of new asset management companies, so bolt-on acquisitions have worked very well there. Quarter-on-quarter, the drivers were pretty much the same as year-on-year, with excellent performances registered in payment services as well as securities business. Based on the strong year-to-date performance, we confirm our full year guidance of growth comfortably exceeding 5% in 2025.

Let me turn to operating expenses on slide 17.

Quarter on quarter costs were unchanged, both in terms of absolute amount and structure.

Somewhat higher IT expenses were were offset by lower personnel costs, other than that there were no major developments. Year-on-year cost inflation remained elevated at eight compared to third quarters of 2024 and 2025, and at 6.8% looking at the first three quarters respectively. The reasons are well known, ranging from higher staff costs to higher IT

Very importantly, we do believe that with this, we have seen the peak of cost inflation. And in the fourth quarter of 2025, the year-on-year cost uplift will decline significantly.

Consequently, it is still our ambition to get as close to the 5% guidance in 2025 as possible.

Actually, the only moving target in this context is the size and timing of the booking of integration costs related to the Santander Polska acquisition. Looking further out and limiting my comments to existing SD operations, we do believe that cost growth will decline materially from 2025 levels in 2026, which falls well for positive operating leverage, given that we also have a strong top line momentum. Talking about operating performance, we move to page 18 and can conclude that the top line performance is the story of the third quarter. We posted record quarterly revenues, which fully offset elevated costs, resulting in record operating profit. The cost income ratio also improved to 46.7% for the quarter. Based on the strong year-to-date operating performance, we are upgrading the full-year cost-income ratio guidance for 2025 to about 48%. And as I mentioned before, we have a constructive stance when it comes to the 2026 operating result outlook of our existing ERSTE operations due to strong top-line momentum and moderating cost inflation in 2026.

This over to you Alexandra for more details on credit risk.

Thank you Stefan and good morning and welcome to this call also from my end. I am on page 19. In the third quarter of 2025 we booked risk costs of 136 million euros or 24 basis points. A year ago risk costs were lower but back then we benefited from FLI and overlay releases in the amount of 101 million euros as opposed to only 19, so 19 million this quarter. So net-net, we actually saw an improvement here and here. As is visible on the left-hand chart, we continue to book risk costs in our Austrian retail and SME operations, but the asset quality situation in Austria has definitely stabilized, thanks to lower NPL inflows here to date. The third quarter bookings in Romania and Slovakia were mostly attributable to the retail business. And like Stefan and Peter, I also would like to explicitly mention the Czech Republic, which continued to excel also in terms of risk performance. As far as FLI and industry overlay provisions are concerned, we now hold a stock of about 460 million euros, slightly down compared to the second quarter. on the back of the already mentioned only minor FLI releases. Accordingly, we are again adjusting our forecast of such provision release in the remainder of 2025 to about 70 million euros. Let me also come back to a point that Peter mentioned in his comments on one-time effects related to the first-time consolidation of Santander Polska. According to IFRS 3 and IFRS 9, We are required to measure all acquired assets at fair value on the date of acquisition and immediately provide for performing ECL of the acquired portfolio on parent company level. Purely technical IFRS bookings that will make our risk-cost line look worse by up to 300 million euros in 2026, but are P&L neutral over time. And importantly, this is not a reflection of any underlying portfolio deterioration of the acquired assets. Moving back to 2025, and given our strong year-to-date credit risk performance, which asset benefited much less from FLI and overlay releases than in previous years, we confirm our full year risk cost outlook of about 20 basis points. Let's now turn to asset quality on page 20. With a consolidated NPL ratio of 2.5% and an NPL coverage ratio excluding collateral, as always, of 74%, asset quality metrics remained strong in this across our footprint. Overall, the NPL ratio benefited from somewhat lower NPL inflows and significantly higher recoveries here to date. Central and Eastern Europe, and again, especially the Czech Republic, continued to do very well, with only Romania and Slovakia showing a small deterioration. In Romania, NPL inflows were registered in the third quarter in retail as well as in the corporate business, while in Slovakia, this was due to some inflows in the retail space. In Austria, the situation was broadly stable. with most of the NPL inflows being tied to the real estate segment, as we have already observed over the past couple of quarters. Nonetheless, and let me stress this once again, the asset quality situation in this segment has definitely not deteriorated, but rather continues to consolidate at somewhat elevated levels. So I still maintain my comments from the second quarter that we have seen the peak in defaults in Austria, but that at the same time you should not overestimate the speed of recovery given the still challenging economic environment. In terms of projections for year-end 2025, we expect the group MPL ratio to stay more or less at current levels. Similarly, coverage is expected to remain broadly unchanged, subject to the structure of new defaults and the magnitude of further FLI and overlay releases. And with this, I already hand back to Stefan.

Thanks, Alexander. Let's briefly look at how the other result performed this quarter on page 21. In short, other result once again benefited from positive one-off. After posting a positive one-off of 88 million euros in the second quarter, the third quarter saw a positive one-off in the form of a provision release related to a legal case in Romania in the amount of 77 million. which also explains the quarter on quarter deterioration to which the increased banking tax in Romania from July also contributed. Year on year, the comparison looks more favorable, even though the tripling of the Austrian banking tax since the start of 2025 did not help in this context. In terms of guidance for the fourth quarter of 2025, we would definitely expect to come in significantly better than for the last quarter a year ago. On page 22, and summing up, the P&L for third quarter of 2025. The record operating performance combined with moderate, however, year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter slightly higher risk costs resulted in a quarterly net profit of €901 million, earnings per share of €2.2 and a return on changeable equity of 18%. As Peter mentioned already, the reason why earnings per share and return on tangible equity both improved quarter on quarter despite reported net profit trailing the second quarter figure has exclusively to do with the timing of 81 dividend payments. In the second quarter, we had some deductions due to this, while in the third quarter, there were no such payments. Overall, we are fully on track to deliver a return on tangible equity of greater than 15% in 2025. With this, let's spend a few minutes on wholesale funding and capital. Page 24 shows that our highly granular and well-diversified retail and SME deposit base, of course, remains the key source of long-term funding. Wholesale funding volumes decreased year-to-date as higher stock of debt securities was more than offset by decline in interbank deposits, mainly repos. The stock of debt securities was pushed up primarily by issuance of covered bonds and senior preferred bonds, characterizing a very successful issuance year for Erste Group, resulting in the updated maturity profile on page 25. My very short summary would be that we successfully completed our 2025 funding plan well ahead of time. Third quarter issuance highlights included a 750 million euro tier two note on holding level, as well as senior non-preferred paper and a covered bond in the amount of 500 million euros each issued by our Czech and Slovak subsidiaries respectively. And finally, for my part, let's look at capital, starting on page 26. Our first half 2025 performance when it comes to regulatory capital and risk-weighted assets was exceptional. And the third quarter was no different. While this is not visible in reported CD1 capital, which is almost entirely attributable to the non-inclusion of third quarter profit, it is all the more visible in risk-weighted assets on the right-hand chart on this slide. The increase in risk-weighted assets from strong business growth was more than offset by asset quality-related portfolio effects, as well as the successful execution of optimization measures such as securitizations. The former cover such factors as rating upgrades and downgrades, migrations to default, and parameter updates. Later, thanks to small securitization transactions in Slovakia and Hungary, also reduced risk-weighted assets by almost 1 billion euros. And consequently, risk-weighted assets overall declined by another 1.5 billion euros in the third quarter. Let's now turn to the important pro forma view of our CET1 ratio on page 27. If we focus on pro forma, we can see that we are pretty much where we targeted to be at year-end, already now after the third quarter. At 18.2%, we could have closed the Polish transaction already in September without falling below our minimum threshold of 13.5% announced at the time of acquisition or signing of the SBA in May. Now, the fourth quarter profit and most of the balance sheet optimization are still to come. So far, securitizations contributed only 12 basis points and assets sales another 11 basis points roundabout. All the rest came from organic capital generation, obviously supported by the temporarily reduced shareholder distributions. Consequently, we now project the year-end 2025 CET1 ratios of higher than 18.5% should the Santander Bank Polska acquisition close in early 2026, or alternatively, of higher than 14% should the transaction be completed inside this year. And with the assumption of At a drawdown unchanged at about 460 basis points as a result of first-time consolidation of Santander Prime Polska, we should be well on our way to exceed our post-consolidation CET1 ratio target of 14.25% during the course of 2026. And at the same time, return to our dividend policy, dividend payout policy of 40 to 50%. And with this, over to you, Peter, for the outlook.

Thank you, Stefan. Thank you, Alexandra. I'm concluding the presentation with our detailed financial outlook for 2025 on page 29. In addition, I will sketch out how I see 2026 shaping up, but let's start with 2025. As is evident from the numbers presented today, 2025 is already a strong year and we have no reason to believe that the fourth quarter will be any different. We have healthy customer volume growth. We have a reasonable favorable interest rate environment. And as market leader, we have a pricing power, all of which support an upgrade in our NII outlook for 2025. We now expect growth of more than 2%. Fees continue to do very well for us, so the guidance of greater than 5% is probably on the conservative end. With this, our top line should grow nicely in 2025. On the cost side, we stick to our guidance of roughly 5% increase in 2025, even though we do realize that the year end-to-date performance and the possible front-loading of some integration costs related to Poland might push this figure slightly higher. Even factoring some cost volatility in, we believe that we have a good shot of printing a 48th handle when it comes to the 2025 cost-income ratio, supported by a strong top line. Risk costs should be in line with our existing guidance of about 20 basis points and return on tangible equity should be comfortably above 15%, also fully in line with guidance. Let's now to the more interesting part in this 2026. First of all, we enter 2026 from position of strengths. ERSTE, as we know it today, enjoys strong growth dynamics. Add to that that 2026 economic outlook for our region is somewhat better than it was for 2025. So volume growth should continue to be healthy. And if we don't see big shifts in the interest rate environment, which is the current expectation, then our top line in 2026 should grow faster than it did in 2025. At the same time, cost inflation should definitely come down next year. So positive operating leverage is not unrealistic for 2026. And with a continued solid credit risk backdrop, we would expect to bring the return on tangible equity north of 15%. That's the existing ASDA business. We are talking about a business that even prior to the acquisition of Santander Polska is in excellent shape in terms of growth and profitability. If we now add Poland to the 2026 equation and leave one of the side, our profit and capital generation capacity will only improve from here. In terms of level 2026 guidance for the combined entity, we therefore feel comfortable with confirming our targets made at the time of transaction announcement. And that's a return on tangible equity of about 19% and EPS uplift of higher than 20% based on current market consensus expectations for 2025. And to be absolutely clear about it, the guidance relates to reported figures rather than figures adjusted for one time items. And these ladies and gentlemen conclude our presentation remarks. Thank you for your attention. We are now ready to take your questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and 1 on the telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and 2. Questions on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode while asking a question. Anyone with a question may press star and 1 at this time. Our first question comes from Gulnara Zaikulova from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning and thank you for taking my questions. So the question on costs, you noted that the cost growth is expected to decline materially 2026. Could you provide additional color on the cost outlook for the coming year and the key factors influencing the cost dynamics across your various markets? Where do you see and expect the most significant cost savings to come from and maybe potential areas of pressure and how are you planning to manage these developments? Thank you.

All right, that's it. Okay, very good. Thank you very much for the question. Now, look, let's start with the environment. I think what we have seen was, and that's, of course, the flip side of the coin of stable rate environment. We've seen that the inflation, while coming down from the super elevated levels over the cycle, has still been at quite elevated levels. That's true for Austria. If you compare Austria to most of the other, if not all of the other Euroland countries to name Hungary or Romania. This combined with the very tight labor markets definitely has been keeping the pressure on wage inflation up. On the flip side of that is, of course, a very, very strong retail business, strong fee business, very good asset quality. So it all, of course, is connected to each other. So that much to the overall backdrop. On the internal, so to say, view, we have always been pointing out that the investments that we started in the second half of 2024 and have been ramping up throughout 2025 in order to improve our process efficiency are clearly seen in our cost line. So we always have been flagging that as around one and a half percentage points. And that is, of course, now also part of the slightly elevated cost numbers in 2025. What of this will come down in 2026? First of all, we see significantly reducing wage inflation pressure all across the countries. Actually, I don't need to be specific anywhere. Of course, the absolute levels are different, but all of them have been coming down by, let's say, one to three percentage points from what we saw in 24 and 25. That's point number one. Point number two, the index adjustments of, let's say, the broad IT spending and so on are hopefully mostly finalized and that definitely is an easing effect. And thirdly, and that's of course most important for you to see how we work on the matters, we will already and we see already significant achievements in the process efficiency and the automation. That means that especially in the operations area and the typical mid to back office areas, you will see reduction of staff here and there. Not a huge reduction, but a significant one in order to bring down the cost uh inflation substantially i.e as uh peter alexandra myself described we see a very good uh chance to come up with a positive operating shows in 2026 altogether thank you thank you the next question comes from amit ranjan from jp morgan please go ahead

Yes, hi, good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. The first one is on capital. Can you please talk about how much of the 40 BIPs optimization measures are now in the numbers? I think, Stefan, you mentioned around 12 basis points. If you could confirm that, please, and what's the outlook for these benefits in the fourth quarter, please? And the second one is on capital return outlook from 2026 onwards, the 40% to 50% dividend payout range. Could there be upside to this range given the pace of capital bills so far? Would it be dividends? Could there be share buybacks? Part of the equation as well, please. And the payout, would it be based on stated net income or would it exclude the one-off? Thank you.

All right. So one after the other. First question, how much is in? Less than half of the 40 pips. However, given the very successful progress all across the measures we are taking, let's not forget the market was quite supportive, very tight spread, so we could do a little bit more of asset sales. Securitizations are on a very good track, as you saw also in one or the other, let me say, statement reported around it. We believe it's going to be above 40 pips at the end of the year, and some of the measures might still happen in Q1. So in other words, so far, only roundabout. Half of the 30 basis points of particular measures are in, but towards the end of the year, it will be more than 40 pips. That's why we are overall in general on better track with the one ratio. So that's point number one. I think you were asking about dividend 25. So 25, very simply put, we will not change anything here. It's going to be 10% of the net profit. Obviously, with the net profit, there is certain fluctuations. So if you put the numbers together, the best guess is somewhere between 50 and 75 cents to the euro. But that's just, so to say, simply calculated. Nothing to be changed there because our clear commitment and goal is that in 2026, shareholder returns on dividend payouts should be very much in the focus. I said it in the presentation that 40 to 50% net profit after 81 deduction is our dividend policy. I think if we get back to that, given good profitability expectations for 26, a very interesting and attractive dividend for 26 should be expected.

Thank you.

The next question comes from from UBS. Please go ahead.

Yes, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I have three of them. The first one would be on the Czech Republic. You're showing really strong 5% sequential NII growth. It seems like you are outperforming the sector both in retail lending and in corporate lending. Could you talk a little bit about the drivers of that, what's behind this, and how sustainable do you see this double-digit retail loan growth in the country, how long this could continue? The second question would be on the NII guidance north of 2% for this year. If I look at the quarterly developments and only assume a flattish sequential development in Q4, you already are at 2.8% up year-on-year. And again, you're showing really good growth in a number of markets, in net interest margin, showing a trough perhaps in Austria, and then clear expansion in a number of other markets. What prevents you actually to become more positive? What are the potential one-offs or other risks to that guidance. And the last question would be on Q4 costs. In the first nine months, you are 6.8% up year on year. Can you comment on what exactly in Q4 will help you to get to around about 5% or 5%-ish level on a full year basis? Any specific one-offs that you booked in the second half of 24 or any potential reliefs you're getting specifically this quarter? Thank you.

Okay, let me start to answer your first question about Czech Republic and our... mortgage lending, consumer lending and corporate lending. Point number one, this trend is going on since more than 18 months. There was a kind of hangover from COVID times in terms of demand. Now it seems to us that this demand looks like quite sustainable and we are just taking out advantage of being market leader there. So we are very well positioned in mortgage lending. And it's also true for consumer lending, but demand in mortgage lending is bigger than in consumer lending. And on the other hand, I think it's fair to say that we have a very balanced loan growth in the Czech Republic. It's not only about retail, it's also about corporate banking. They're doing very well in SME lending in corporate banking in the Czech Republic. So we are quite happy with what we have achieved so far. And we are deeply convinced that the demand in corporate and retail lending is a sustainable one.

On NII guidance, I can keep it very short. We don't have any whatsoever one-offs or so in mind. And greater than 2% can also be greater than 3%, right? But we simply wanted to leave a certain room of, so to say, caution in. That's all I can say. We are super confident to beat the two. We are reasonably confident to beat the three. But that's pretty much it. Nothing more to say here. Q4 costs, very interesting point. Please, if you look at the quarterly cost chart in the presentation, you will very clearly see that the 24 Q4 was elevated even more than usually the Q4 bookings are elevated. There are various reasons for that. Some of these effects will repeat, to be very honest with you. For example, we have a component for our employees and managers in the bonus payments, which is tied to the share performance. And that obviously has to be provisioned in the cost. So that's one element which we repeat. I was already mentioning in my presentation that there is a small, but not completely immaterial part of the Polish integration cost that we will book. So we will see some effects in Q4, but certainly not such a jump up like in 2024. That's why the year on year quota for quarter four comparison will come down quite substantially. And that helps us to come much closer to the 5% than we are in so far in the first three quarters. That's the explanation for Q4. But let me allow me, please, also to make a statement for 26, as I already answered in the former question. That's really critical that we bring down the cost inflation in 2026. Even if we have fantastic top line, it's important for us to come to, let me say, at or even below inflation levels in order to support the overall operating performance. And that we definitely have in the cards for 2026. Thank you. Thank you.

The next question comes from Benoit Patrick from Kepler Schubler. Please go ahead.

Yes, good morning. So the first question on my side is on the earnings power for Poland. Just wondering what you see operationally in Poland and also looking at, you know, several factors like rate outlook and bank tax. If you could refresh us on your guidance for Poland for 26. Then second question is, Again, on NI, what can stop NI to further increase in the coming quarters, basically? I mean, you have an instabilization, very strong loan growth across the board, positive mix effect. I think in your slide, you mentioned potentially flattening of the curve or ECB red cuts, but it sounds like NI momentum will remain strong in the coming quarters. I just wanted to confirm again that You know, with NIM stabilization, it's going to be a function of loan growth as far as NI is concerned. And then last one, just on the loan-to-deposit ratio, which is deteriorating a bit for several quarters, do you plan any specific steering actions to, well, rebalance deposit growth versus loan growth? Because loan growth will probably stay strong next year. So any planned actions there? Thank you very much.

If I may start to answer a question. So the first part about Poland, I think yesterday or the day before yesterday, hopefully future colleagues in Poland announced their third quarter results. So you can see they are still going very, very strong. And also the forecast for next year when it comes to economic development is the highest in the whole region will be definitely above 3%. When it comes to NII in general, before I hand over to Stefan, this is exactly what we tried to explain, that when we assume that interest rates will more or less stay at the same level as they are today, where this is also our forecast, then there should be much more correlation between volume growth and NII growth compared to this year because we are quite happy that we succeeded to increase NII this year and we should not forget that this year we have seen a decrease in interest rate environment. So it's just given the demand in our region and again this is the only region in Europe which is still growing So the demand in loan growth and our capability to fulfill this demand led to a situation that our NRI is growing, although interest rates are coming down. If you put this in perspective for next year, and let's assume again that interest rate level will stay where it is, then our NRI growth should be even better.

I completely agree. That's exactly how we explain the situation. And I have absolutely no disagreement with your statement that further on in the upcoming quarters, we could also see a further growth in NRI. There's nothing in our statements that would contradict that. It was shown only in the discussion around Q4. And you know exactly that there can always be a couple of effects that, you know, drive it a little bit more up and down. I think our guidance for Q4 is also open on the upper side. So no problem with that. One reminder, just not to get too overly excited. Of course, certain measures that we took very successfully also have a certain limit. So in other words, deposit repricing doesn't go on forever. And we have been very successful in that across the markets, as we explained. Also, let's not forget that the funding, so for example, wholesale funding levels, which we were perfectly making use of in 2025, there is no guarantee that those funding spreads will So, I mean, we are super optimistic, but we also should remain realistic and not expect that things go through the roof. On your loan-to-deposit statement, I have a completely different opinion here. Very simply put, I think we are in a perfect sweet spot. We're in a perfect sweet spot. Anything around this 90% loan-to-deposit ratio across the group, I feel super comfortable with. Of course, there are big differences between the markets. I'm happy to go in a different session into the details market by market. But overall, the loan-to-deposit ratio is exactly where we like it to be in this rate environment. And we will, of course, very closely watch all the indicators on the liquidity and deposit front. But so far, it could hardly be better. Thank you.

All right. Thank you.

The next question comes from Gabor Keme from Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning. One question on Poland, please, and the bank tax in particular. The bank tax proposal, I believe this is still a proposal. If this gets implemented, how would that impact the operations of Santander Polska? I believe you are expecting to create significant goodwill with the deal. Could the bank tax impact the valuation and with that the capital impact from this acquisition? That's the first question. Secondly, on the NII outlook, thank you for all the clarifications. Just numbers-wise, I believe you are annualizing close to the $8 billion mark in Q3 or perhaps H2. And then I believe you guided around $3 billion from Santander Polska, which together gets us to $11 billion before considering growth. Are there any trends, any deviations you would like to highlight? for our modeling the 2026 NIA outlook, please. And the final one would be Czechia is about to form a new government. Do you have any views on the likelihood of the new government introducing another bank tax? Thank you.

Let me start with the last part of your question about Czech Republic. So far, and also not during the election campaigns, there was anything mentioned when it comes to banking tax. Of course, we know that all over Europe, banking taxes are an issue because a lot of countries have an issue with their public debt levels, which is not so much the case for the Czech Republic. I think therefore this is not such a hot topic in Czech Republic. So from today's perspective, we don't expect the banking tax in the Czech Republic. But of course, I need a political disclaimer. You never know when it comes to politics.

On NAI, Gabor, very briefly. I mean, I think your statement on the on the existing pyramid of the group can only be signed off. That's correct. That's all fine. I'm not in the position to comment yet on the outlook for for our future policy series. First of all, we don't know. the detailed internal drivers, the hedges, all of that. So please, I ask you for understanding that we can only talk about that really after closing. And certainly you can read a lot out of this from the reporting of future Polish colleagues. On the pending tax law, I completely agree. It's still in the political decision process. There are all kinds of discussions around that. I don't want to and I cannot comment on that in more detail. What is very important to understand, even if the government proposal goes through one-to-one, we are talking about the one-time lift up to 31% in 2026, then 26% and then 23% as, so to say, the new level, which of course eases substantially your assumption in terms of the terminal value and stuff like impairment tests and goodwill So we have been doing the numbers, obviously, and we don't see any whatsoever reason to adjust them now. But of course, we will do this ongoingly. We are in constant contact, of course, already today with our auditors in assessing the situation. But so far, we don't see any changes on that. Adding to this, of course, and Peter said it in a couple of statements also publicly, the strategic rationale as well as the overall, so to say, profitability, long-term outlook doesn't change at all. We are used to those kind of measures. Do we like them? Obviously not. Do we have to live with them? Certainly yes. Thank you.

You are indeed. Thank you for all the comments. Thank you.

The next question comes from Ben Maher from KBW. Please go ahead.

Thank you for taking my question. It's not just two quick ones. The first one is just on the cost growth we're seeing in Turkey. That's obviously accelerated a fair bit in the quarter, but inflation has been quite low there for a while. So I'm just interested to see what the main driver of that is. And then my second question is just on the overlay releases. I think you did mention it before that you got into fewer releases than what you've to last quarter. I just wanted to give any color on the potential releases for next year. And do you have a view on the terminal stock that you're targeting? Or is it something that you don't really target? Thank you.

I start with a question on the releases of FLI and overlays. So I said for this year, for the remainder of this year, it's roughly 70 million, which we expect and going forward with even somewhat lower levels. So maybe around 50 million releases next year, and then we would rather expect to have come to a certain stock of FLI, which we would also then carry forward. So this is the current expectation. So no huge releases, but some.

Okay, I think your question, we had a bad line at this moment, but I think your question was around check costs, right?

Yeah, just the acceleration and the cost growth in Czechia during the quarter.

No, I think, I mean, look, I just looked up a couple of numbers with my colleagues. I don't see any specifics. Look, the wage inflation level roundabout is in the mid single digit. So we had adjustments of salaries around 5%. We had a couple of very good and forward-looking initiatives on IT side, AI and so on in Czech Republic, which also played to it. But maybe... If you can be more specific, I don't see any outlier whatsoever in Czech Republic, by no means, on the cost side. So it's business as usual, I would say. And comparing to the market, I think we are at average. But maybe you spotted something, then let us know.

Okay, thank you.

The next question comes from Kishendra Dubey from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. I think thanks for the color on the NIA. I just wanted to check on the fee guidance, actually. So as of till nine months, you're trading at 8%. I know you say more than 5%, so it could be 5, 6, 7, consensus 6 and half. How do you see that trend developing? And the second question was on the 2026 net profit guidance. When you talk about adjusted 4 billion, is it pre-81 or is it post And lastly, you talked about 200 millions of one-offs. Are those tax-deductible or those are not tax-deductible? Thank you.

Okay, the second one is easy. Everything that we talk about is pre-81. So if you do, so to say, your math around, for example, dividend calculation or the like, and we can provide you with the 81 payments, absolutely no problem. So that's all the numbers that Peter and myself were using pre-81 dividend or, so to say, 81 costs. On the fee trends, look, yes, you're perfectly right that we had these discussions, as you can imagine. Given the Q3 or year-to-date numbers, the greater than 5% looks a tick conservative. On the other hand, we all know that on fees, one percentage point is something around 25, 30 million. that can easily jump up and down. So what value is there if you go to mid, single, upper, digit, pipapo. So in that sense, there is no break in whatsoever. Q4 usually is very strong. always subject to, for example, capital markets and so on in terms of asset management fees and so on. But there is no whatsoever slowdown, as I said in the presentation already visible. What will be interesting, of course, to see on the back of theory of, again, the similar effect in the other direction, if inflation constantly comes down and slows down, then obviously some of the fee drivers might slow. But nonetheless, with our strategic focus, we are super optimistic, by the way, also for Poland, that we can improve some of the fee generating activities substantially.

And maybe if I may add some kind of sentiment from a business point of view. As Stefan absolutely rightly mentioned, inflation was already coming down this year. So what we have expected for this year was a little bit more decrease in the payments, which didn't happen so far. So I think our capability to generate new clients. is supporting us there to compensate the decrease in inflation and the potential impact on the payment fees. When it comes to asset management, it's clear that the volatility can increase, of course, in the upcoming months, which will be mainly reflected in the volume of our assets under management in asset management. When it comes to fee income generation, you know, the way how we have built up or succeeded to build up our asset management proposition in most of our countries is this monthly regularly investments in asset management products, which makes us not so much dependent on volatility in the market because it's kind of cost average principle, which is supporting our clients to build up wealth in a very stable way. And last but not least, also coming back to Stefan's remark, we see a huge potential in terms of fee income and asset management in Poland because we believe that this market is somehow under-penetrated when it comes to asset management, which is not a surprise because there was a different history in interest rates compared to other countries we are operating in. So if I remember correctly, we have never seen negative interest rates in Poland. So the engagement or the love to term deposits is a little bit higher compared to other countries. But when you look at the volumes of asset management and given the size of the market and given the proposition of our bank, we see a lot of opportunities.

Thanks, Peter. We were speculating. I think you asked about the tax deductibility of the integration costs. This is a very important information. The lion's share of it certainly is tax deductible. That's absolutely clear. Details can be given once we are more specific and have the detailed costs and everything on the table. But the general answer is yes.

Thank you. Thanks a lot.

The next question comes from Ricardo Rovere from Mediobanca. Please go ahead.

Thanks a lot for taking my questions. First of all, if I'm not mistaken, 300 million credit losses that may burden your profit and loss in 2026. Just to be clear, this is the purchase price allocation when you're measuring all the assets and all the liabilities of Santander Bank market prices. So this eventually should lower the goodwill that you will book out of the transaction. So it should be kind of capital neutral. If I understand it correctly, it's all completely irrelevant from that standpoint. The second question is just a clarification from Alexander. If I'm not mistaken, I understand that in 2026, you expect to use only 50 million of XLIs, which is just a confirmation of this number. Then, if possible, I'd love to hear your thoughts. If the SRTs that you have done and that she planned to do, as far as I understand, will have a revenue impact at some point, or in any case, how much it could be. Then I have a question on Poland, and on, you know, the Advocate General, a month ago, or whenever it was, talked about, said that the, let's say, the Polish court have the right to look into the Vibor case, using Bible as a benchmark. Is it something that you're looking at? Is it something that worries you? Is it something that is a matter of concern for you? And then I have another question on deposit, if I may. I mean, wage growth in all the countries where you operate is running above GDP growth. And I guess this is the reason why the deposit growth is seen at least in some countries, loan growth. Is that supposed to continue, you think? And if that continues, do you see reason or ways to move some of these deposits, considering 90% loan-to-deposit ratio or something like that, into the asset management, which, if I'm not mistaken, hit 100 billion? So those have been growing pretty fast. And you are happy, right? with the amount of asset management fees, wealth management fees within your revenue base. So it's something that you can consider expanding. Thanks.

Okay, let me start. So first, very short, yes, I can confirm, we expect currently 50 million release for 2026, but not only from FLI, this also includes some releases from the current overlays that we have for the cyclicals. Now, the second one, this I cannot confirm. So this up to maximum 300 million that I was mentioning, the one ECL recognition is not the PPA effect. So IFRS, there are two topics. The one is IFRS 3. where we are obliged to measure the financial assets at fair value on the acquisition date. And on top comes IFRS 9 subsequent measurement, where we are forced to book the performing ECL of the acquired portfolio on the level of the mother company immediately. So it's not a PPA effect. It's a combination of IFRS 3 fair valuation and additionally IFRS 9 requirements. We also have, if you're interested, the paragraphs for you to look it up. But I'm sure Thomas will be happy to take this up afterwards.

All right. On to SRTs. Thanks for the question because it gives me the opportunity to answer a few points. Of course, the ones you were asking about, but also some you have not been asking for. First, what costs are associated with the Obviously, there is no free lunch anywhere. Therefore, very clearly, if we conclude all the SRTs currently foreseen for the rest of the year or latest in Q1, then you have a roundabout for the next two, three years, a fee expense of 50 million euros. So that's exactly the cost. It's booked in the fee expenses since they are kind of considered as insurance payments, if you want to have a comparison, but you know that anyway. What is very important to mention is that we have an extremely well-diversified portfolio of SRTs in planning, both in terms of geographies as well as in terms of of areas, so to say, of business and forward-looking. And Alexander and myself have discussed this in very much detail with our teams. We want to use SRTs not only as a capital optimization measure, but also as a kind of portfolio optimization tool. And I think it's both in terms of segment risks, as well as optimization on pockets right and left. And we learned a lot in the last two years again, and we are super happy to have this tool at hand. And in terms of the cost and capital relief, I think it's a fantastic tool for our current tasks and for our current goals. Maybe last comment to put these things in perspective. If you look at the overall European landscape of banks and comparable players in the market, We have been way below the utilization of SRTs so far. And with all the executions that we are aiming for, we should land somewhere at the average of European banks comparable to ourselves. That's also where we feel very comfortable. Thank you.

And if I may answer or go on with the law lecture here. When it comes to Viber, so not too much new since we talked last time. So there is this preparation of the decision of the European Court, which is saying that the usage of Viber in a contract is compliant in loan contracts. So, there are also some decisions in Poland from local courts which are in favor of banks. So, I don't want to downplay it too much because it's drilling down that this seems to be not a systemic problem like the Swiss franc topic was several years ago, but it seems to be a topic which is drilling down to the concrete advice which was given to clients. If advisors have made clients aware that they have floating rates. So I think this is a completely different situation. But to sum it up, I mean, we are fully aware that consumer protection is here to stay. And this is something we are dealing with in all our markets. And just remember, everyone, this started in Austria roughly 20 years ago. So it's not only about countries like Hungary or Poland or so. This is a topic where we are dealing with all the time. And the easiest way to be compliant is to come up with compliant products.

Yes, and I think, Peter, do you want to? I think I take the first part of the deposit question. With regard to growth, yes, well spotted. Of course, there are short-term, there are deviations from GDP growth, deposit growth, both on individual level for us, but also in the respective markets. That stems from various matters, as you perfectly know. It's liquidity, central bank liquidity, as well as money supply overall. I think that in general, we are an extremely attractive bank to our depositors. The trust that we have been gaining and we are working on every single day is a factor. We are a big player in all the markets. All of that plays into this. On your other question, and I think that's obvious, we want to have a very good balance between keeping a strong deposit base, but of course, advising our clients for a right balance of asset management products, long-term savings, and better yielding products. And I think it's all about the balance. It's all about good advice. And if you look at also the feedback of the market and all these measures like MPS, CXI, I think our colleagues are doing an outstanding job there. And that's also the goal for the future. Money which is available for a longer-term saving, of course, should not be kept necessarily on the lowest dealing average. That's the way we are advising our clients, and that's how we want to help them build their wealth for their long-term future.

Thanks, thanks, Stefano. If I may pull up one second on this topic. At the moment, with the current pricing at the moment of the deposit, is it better to have the deposits on balance sheet, so feeding an AI, or off balance sheet in asset management? Where is the margin better now?

I think there's no clear answer to it. It's very much depending on client situation, of course. And on the other hand, it's also fair to say that I think we have proven over the last, let's say, 24 or even longer period of time that our capability to manage interest rates from deposits in both kind of environments, increasing interest rates and decreasing interest rates, we are doing very well. Point number two, As Stefan rightly mentioned, for long-term investments, we are very much in favor of our clients to invest in asset management products because we still believe that this is an area not only in countries like Poland, where we see room for improvement. This is true for all over Europe. Look at the Draghi report, look at the letter report, look at every kind of speech politicians are giving, typically on Sunday. Not always having impact, of course, but this is very obvious that there will be a strong tendency over the upcoming 20 to 30 years the people in Europe will invest much more in asset management products. So there is no clear guidance between technical P&A measures. We are doing very well in financial interest rate levels and, of course, giving advice, the right, proper advice to our clients when it comes to asset management.

Yeah, thanks.

The next question comes from Seamus Murphy from Cargill. Please go ahead.

Hi. Yeah, two questions, please. I suppose one of the major positives for Airsta when we look across Europe is that relative to most of your peers who are also growing is that you've kept your FTEs or your employee numbers pretty constant since 22 despite the balance sheet growth. I suppose my question is how long can this be sustained and should we consider that the employee numbers will grow into 27 or how are you thinking about the growth in employee numbers? Just very briefly on NII, I suppose when I think about NII, there's two components to it. Obviously, we have the structural element to it, which is the potential yield uplift still to come from your current account reinvestment of your maturity and fixed rate products. So, I mean, in this quarter, I think you mentioned Slovakia in particular for this in terms of the uplift that came this quarter. But assuming that this is happening across the group, I suppose it would be great to know the size of the fixed rate mortgage pool back in your current accounts and also what the current back book yield is on those products versus the front book so we can have some estimate of how this component of NII evolves kind of like in the next three to four years. And I suppose the last component of that question is just obviously we've seen this movement to current accounts and as the curve steepens from here and the base that you do believe the curve to steepen, how quickly do you or how do you decide between the reinvestment rate, whether you put it at cash at central bank or whether you again reinvest in your own fixed rate mortgage products? Thank you.

If I may start, let me answer your question related to FTE development. Of course, we try to keep the numbers of FTEs flat in a way that the way how we look at our business is it should be a scalable business, which is anyhow not an easy task because we are in the same situation like all other European banks when it comes to IT legacy. So it's a lot of work to further improve efficiency in terms of technology. But this is a clear part of our strategy that we have seen some investments this year already, really what we always called investments related to our strategy, that we want to achieve a level of end-to-end processes, which should help us to keep FTE development stable in the future, even adding additional business on our balance sheet. This is a very clear goal. And of course, putting aside that we will have roughly 10,000 employees more, after the acquisition of Poland.

Let me take up your question, which is a very interesting one. And let me say at the start that some of the details I would kindly ask you to take offline with Thomas, because, of course, we could talk about overall interest rate strategy for at least an hour or so. But let me state a few of the most important matters. I think what is helping us at this very important time, and that's why, for example, Slovakia is outperforming so much, Czech Republic to a part as well, is that we have re-fixations. in durations which are now upward pricing. So mortgages in Slovakia, for example, have a typical fixation period of five years, right? So we are now still fixing substantially upwards and in the same moment deposits are coming down. That's why a country, a Euro country like Slovakia is so well performing apart from their excellent new production. That's one effect. The other one, if you look at the details of the NII results of the last couple of quarters, you see that other Austria, typically where we have the ELM investments, where we have been booking, of course, also kind of investments going against the extensitivities of the Austrian slash Euro sensitivity for downward pressure have been gaining substantially. So these are big bond investments which are in amortized costs. but of course are benefiting from the high investment yields, which leads me to your third point, and that's the steeper curve. Now, look, I mean, this is a trading book. Having been a trader myself in the past, it's not a trading book where we are reacting on a day on a weekly basis. But of course, we are very closely looking into the shapes of the yield curves. Of course, sometimes you get it better, sometimes not as good. But I think the last 18, 24 months, we were anticipating the shape of the yield curve and the spots in the curve where we thought the duration is the best. Very well. And currently, we have a duration on the overall investment book for around about four and a half years, a little bit different from country to country. But overall, the yield has, of course, been shifting upwards. For those who know us for a long time, the investment book has been coming down substantially for many, many years and now has been going further up for, Thomas, I think, five years, right? Five years upward trending. And on page 43 of the presentation, you find a very good description of how the allocation looks like in terms of geographies as well as, so to say, accounting logics.

Can I just have a very brief follow-up, if you don't mind? I'm just trying to figure out, is it still a couple of hundred basis points or more in terms of the refixations that we will see over the next few years? I mean, some quantum would be super beneficial.

What I can say from the top of my head, in Slovakia, for example, since I was talking about Slovakia, we have another two years to go, roughly, in terms of positive refixations. Austria is different, as you know, because there is a different mix between variable and fixed loans on the Austrian EBU. It's more fixed. On the Sparkassen, it's more variable. That's why we always have a bigger sensitivity there. In terms of absolute numbers, I kindly ask Thomas to follow up with you to give you the breakdown of volumes country by country. It's no problem. We have all of that.

Okay. Thank you so much.

You're welcome.

The next question comes from Robert Brodda from TKO TB Securities.

Please, go ahead. Hello, everyone. Thanks for taking up my question. I want to revisit the adjusted profit guidance for 26 to see if I got it correctly. Am I right that you see this in adjusted terms at around 4 billion euro level? And then if you could provide sort of a rough bridge between the adjusted and report it, Should we assume that the potential IFRS 9, 300 million would be sort of included in that bridge, plus the potential 100 to 200 million additional reorganization and post-acquisition costs? So that's on adjusted versus reported, 26 outlook, and related to that, can you reiterate what's your Both acquisition roti guidance is this guidance based on the adjusted or reported figure. Thank you.

Okay, so thanks very much. So again, clarifying was what Peter and myself said and also Alexander was perfectly explaining the IFRS 3 and IFRS 9 effects and so on. First of all, we don't talk about a guidance here to be very precise. We talk about our ambition labels. And once we have finalized the closing successfully, then we Certainly, when we talk to the market, to you, again, end of February, then we will translate everything into a real guidance, just to be precise here. We are always talking about the difference between adjusted and reported. You are perfectly right in your description. When we talk about the ballpark 200 million integration costs and the estimated 300 million of the effects which are long-term P&L neutral that Alexander and Peter explained, we are looking at a reported matter for 2026. But again, guidance and more detailed insights we will then be providing with the hopefully end of February reporting for the full year 2025.

Right, and then the post-acquisition ROTI, I assume that would also be sort of highlighted in February, correct?

Nineteen percent, unchanged, absolutely correct. On reported basis. Thank you.

We have a follow-up question from Riccardo Rovere from Mediobanca. Please, go ahead.

Thanks to that. When it comes to the 462 million of overlays and SLIs, Alexander, it's possible to have a split between the two, how much is the overlays? And could the overlays be used against the 300 million that you expect on performing loans in Poland? The other question I have is, How do you think about the fiscal boost from the debt break relaxation in Germany? Do you see any potential positive spillover in Austria? Do you have any idea how this could eventually play out? Thank you.

Okay. So the breakdown is of Q3. We are talking about 462 of stock. There are 323 FLI, 122 overlays, cyclicals, and some minor other overlays. So this is the breakdown. And we expect, but this is really only an expectation, so in case we can release, or can and have to, it's both, 70 million release until end of 2025, this would be a split of the 70 million between FLI and cyclical overlays. To your question, if we can use going forward for 26, so this is against this ECL day one booking, we cannot. These are two completely different concepts. But of course, a release is always a release. And if you add provisions, but we cannot net it in the sense of a methodological netting. This is not possible.

And even may take the question about Germany. To be clear, we expected a positive impact even a little bit earlier, but it's taking longer due to different reasons. But let me share with you, I had a discussion with the CEO of a construction company, one of our bigger clients, and he's doing roughly 50% of his turnover in Germany. And they are building a street in Romania at the moment in Bucharest, and they are able to build a street for 30 kilometers in one shot. In Germany, it's a different frame and a different scheme how things are operated. There you have to tender every five kilometers. And I don't want to judge it. It could make very much sense how they do it in Germany, but it just takes longer. On the other hand, it should be much more sustainable because to spend this 500 billion, it will take some time. There should be a positive support for economic development. And yes, of course, we're expecting positive impact in countries like Poland, but also Czech Republic, maybe Slovakia. But this is something we expect for 2026. And I personally expected the second half of 2025, so you see a slight increase in the economic sentiment in Germany, but so far not the super bazooka booster as it was announced at the beginning.

Peter, if I understand you correctly, you expect to see something in 2026 on the back of that?

Yes, exactly. Okay.

Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Peter Bozek for any closing remarks.

So then let me say thank you to all of you. Thank you for listening to us. Thank you for your questions. Stefan and I are very much looking forward to see some of you at least in person next week during our roadshow. And let me tell you that we will come up with a full year resized 2025 on the 26th of February 2026. Very much looking forward to it. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Coral School and thank you for participating in the conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Goodbye.