Engie Sa Ord

polite request, please, if you could limit your questions to one or two only. And with that, over to Catherine. Thank you.

Thank you, RTN. Good evening, everyone. I want to start today's presentation by highlighting the strong progress NG has made on the execution of our strategic plan that we announced in May. This was a plan designed to build a strong foundation for long-term earnings growth and a sustainable dividend, while maintaining a strong balance sheet for the group. As a reminder, under this plan, we are exiting non-core activities to build a simpler ENGIE. The disposal program is proceeding at pace, and the recent equants announcement is indeed a major milestone. enabling Engie to reallocate capital into core activities and capture the many investment opportunities we see, particularly in renewables. We are also working to enhance the efficiency of the group through a rigorous performance plan, and very importantly, we are ensuring that all our actions are driven by ENGIE's climate ambition of net zero by 2045 across all three scopes. I am very pleased to say that we have made strong progress across each of these areas, and crucially, this has been achieved alongside a very strong nine-month performance. In addition to executing on the strategic plan, We are taking actions to maximize operational availability of our generation assets to capture the commodity price tailwinds. We are optimizing performance across a mix of assets, all of which have exposure to the power price environment. And where possible, we have accelerated hedging for actual production for future years And we will give you a full update on this at the year-end results when we provide a three-year guidance to 2024. Turning now to the announcement that we made last week, where we entered into exclusive negotiations with BUIC for the sale of 100% of equants. Bouygues' proposal was indeed the most compelling offer, taking into account all criteria, including financial valuation. Thanks to the quality and strategic fit of the assets, Bouygues intends to create a world leader in multi-technical services anchored in France. And on the social front, Bouygues has agreed not to implement any forced redundancy plans in France and Europe for five years, and to create 10,000 additional jobs over five years. We truly believe that this operation will offer strong development opportunities for all Equance employees. With an enterprise value at 7.1 billion euros, this is among the largest caveats in Europe and a testament to our ability to deliver complex projects. The next steps include consultation with relevant employee representative bodies, and the transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. In line with the plan that we communicated, it is expected to close in the second half of next year. Alongside the other previously announced disposals, such as four countries exit year to date, we have made significant progress towards exiting non-core activities. The speed of execution has been facilitated by the tireless work and commitment of our teams, and whom I would like to sincerely thank for their contribution. Turning now to the nine-month results. I am very pleased to report another strong quarter for ENGIE, continuing the trend of solid performance from the start of this year. EBIT increased to 4.1 billion euros, up 57% on an organic basis. This strong performance was supported by measures that we put in place, enabling us to rebound rapidly from COVID, in line with the progressive recovery in economic activity levels, and by strong operational performance with high level of asset availability. In particular, in Belgium, when nuclear availability of 92% led to much higher levels of output. Our results benefited from temperature and price effects. Our performance plan continued to deliver results across the board, underpinned by proactive management actions on loss-making entities, procurement savings, and operational excellence. As a result, we have upgraded the 2021 guidance Engie now expects to deliver higher earnings in the full year than previously communicated. This reflects a very strong performance in the nine months and the continued improvement in market conditions throughout the year for nuclear and French hydro production, as well as a positive volume effect from the Belgian nuclear assets. Engie now expects net recurring income group share in the range of 3.0 to 3.2 billion in 2021, based on indicative EBIT range of 6.1 to 6.5 billion euros. Moving to operational progress across the four global business units, in renewables we have commissioned 3.7 gigawatts in the last 12 months, And I will cover ENGIE's progress in renewables in more detail shortly. Energy solutions benefited from a strong recovery from COVID and activity levels are in line with expectations. In our network GBU, we started commercial operation at the 1,000 kilometer Guala Azul power line in Brazil. And in termo, we progressed on coal exit with completion of the sale of Jorge Lacerda in Brazil. In supply, where the French government announced a tariff freeze for regulated customers from the 1st of November until the end of June next year, the government has proposed an amendment to the 2022 budget law with a view to compensating energy and other suppliers for loss in revenue due to the regulated gas tariff freeze. And this amendment, when voted through, is expected to keep ENGIE economically neutral while enabling the group to recognize revenues and margins. Tackling climate change is at the heart of our group strategy. ENGIE is committed to accelerating the transition to carbon neutrality with our target to be net zero by 2045 across all scopes, And in line with this strategy, I am proud to say that Engie is one of the founding members to join the First Movers Coalition, which was launched last week at COP26. By joining this coalition, Engie commits to buying low-carbon equipment to help develop decarbonized supply chains, which is crucial to reducing global emissions. In the last nine months, we have commissioned 1.8 gigawatts of renewables covering solar, onshore and offshore wind assets. And we are on track to commission 3 gigawatts in 2021. In France alone, we commissioned 27 projects in solar and wind totaling around 300 megawatts, reinforcing a leadership position in renewables with install capacity of nearly 8 gigawatts. In addition, we signed green corporate PPAs for a total volume of 1.9 gigawatts in nine months compared to 1.5 gigawatts for the full year 2020 to provide major industrial and technology companies with renewable power, supporting them on the path to decarbonize their own operations. So today, Engie has 33 gigawatts of renewables in operation with strong O&M capabilities underpinned by our expertise in commercializing renewables. We are accelerating investment in this area while bringing our industrial and energy management approach. And in line with our strategy, we will continue to invest in our key markets where we can develop complementary asset portfolios. In summary, Our objective is to reach 50 gigawatts by 2025 and 80 gigawatts by 2030. And importantly, we intend to achieve this while maintaining a consistently disciplined approach and a strong focus on returns.

And now, over to you, Judith. Thank you, Catherine, and good evening, everyone. It's great to be here with you. I would like to start by highlighting the importance of the equine announcement from a financial perspective. We are very pleased with the 7.1 billion euros enterprise value. This now clearly reflects the value of this great business with opportunities for both growth and margin improvement. These activities were less aligned to our business model but will greatly benefit from being part of the big group. On completion, this transaction will significantly simplify Engie. It will enable us to focus our management time and capital to core activities, notably to renewables, to drive long-term earnings growth and shareholder returns. I would like to thank the teams for their tremendous work on this important step. Turning now to our very strong results for the last nine months. EBITDA and EBIT have increased by 23% and 50% respectively. I'm particularly pleased with an organic EBIT growth of 57%. The negative foreign exchange impact of minus 106 million euros was mostly due to the BRL and USD depreciation versus the euro. The scope effect was limited at negative 25 million euros. We delivered strong cash flow generation, with CFFO increasing by 1 billion euros. Net financial debt increased, primarily driven by growth investments. Given the increase in earnings, this did not affect our credit metrics, which remain in line with our targeted rating. Let's now take a closer look at the last nine months' organic performance by Activity. Except for thermal, all activities grew organically. Before I discuss the operational drivers, let me go through the following key favorable external effects. Firstly, COVID restrictions were less stringent compared to last year, and our teams have worked tirelessly to adapt to this new environment. This led to a very good rebound, mainly in client solutions, other, and supply. Secondly, colder temperatures in 2021 supported the contribution of networks, supply, and others. In France alone, the total temperature effect was 283 million euros positive year on year. And thirdly, the price environment had mixed effects. On the positive side, higher power prices fueled higher contribution for nuclear and renewables. For example, outright power generation from nuclear and hydro in Belgium and France benefited from a price effect of over €300 million. million euros. On the flip side, thermal was impacted by a negative timing effect due to market conditions for gas power plants in Europe and by a drop in energy margins in Chile. In addition to these external effects, on the next slide, you will see how operational progress and other effects contributed to this organic growth. Renewables benefited from further positive GFOM rulings in the third quarter 2021 in Brazil, which allow us to recover past energy costs. These resulted from constructive exchanges with the regulator by our teams. Wind and solar assets delivered a good performance with overall higher volumes, in particular thanks to the commissioning of new capacity. These positive effects were partially offset by the impact of the Texas extreme weather event in the first quarter of 2021. In networks, results increased with higher contribution from power lines and from TAG in Brazil. This was partly offset by lower RAB remuneration rates in France. Client solutions showed strong commercial progress, both for energy solutions and for equines. but their EBIT contribution was also impacted by some loss-making activities as well as innovation businesses with higher development costs. Thermal benefited from positive one-offs mainly in 2021 and from higher ancillaries. Our teams also reduced internal unplanned unavailability by around 10%, which is a noteworthy operational achievement. Supply was impacted by the reversal of 2020 positive one-offs and by lower margins in Belgium. For nuclear, our Belgian assets reach an excellent availability of 92%, reflecting substantial operational improvements as well as lower maintenance works. DNA was lower following the 2020 impairment. In line with existing profit-sharing agreements in Belgium, nuclear contribution taxes increased. Activities reported in others were impacted by the reversal of 2020 positive one-offs for GEM and by the lower contribution of GTT after a particularly strong 2020. Finally, Our performance plan continues to deliver results across the board, allowing us to confirm our 2021 full-year target of 100 million euros EBIT contribution. Turning now to investments, year-to-date, we invested 2.9 billion euros in growth capex. This was focused investment in line with our net zero target by 2045 and with the framework we presented in May. 37% was allocated to renewables, 33% to networks, and 20% to energy solutions. More than 90% was invested organically. Turning to CFFO, which was 5.3 billion euros in the first nine months of 2021. CFFO was up 1 billion euros year on year, mainly driven by the following. First, operating cash flow was 1.2 billion euros higher, reflecting the EBITDA increase. Second, the overall change in working capital requirements was flat. There was a positive change from energy management activities, largely driven by rising gas prices, leading to a positive effect from margin calls. This was linked to gas net buyer positions and was partly offset by a negative impact from an increase in gas inventory. At the same time, the change in working capital requirements for other activities was negative. This was mainly because of margin calls in our French hydro affiliate CNR due to power selling positions with increasing power prices. Moving to our balance sheet, net financial debt increased with growth capex and dividends exceeding CFFO and disposals for the period. On disposals, I should mention that we still expect the 1.1 billion euros proceeds from the GRT gas partial disposal by the end of 2021, which are not included in this bridge. In addition, the reduction in net debt from equants is expected at closing in the second half of 2022. Regarding credit metrics, at the end of the third quarter, the net financial debt of EBITDA ratio was 2.4 times stable since year end 2020. The economic net debt to EBITDA ratio stood at 3.6 times lower than at year end 2020 and in line with our target ratio of below or equal to four times. To conclude, let me take a step back and remind you of the value creation framework we presented in May. Over the first nine months of 2021, we continued driving simplification, notably, of course, with the equines announcement, improving our business mix with focused growth investment on our key priorities, enhancing performance by confirming our 100 million euros net EBIT contribution target for 2021. We delivered a very strong nine-month 2021 financial performance. Lastly, we are, of course, very happy to upgrade our 2021 guidance given the very strong nine-month results and the tailwinds we are operationally able to capture. Before handing over to Catherine for the conclusion, again, I would like to take this opportunity to thank our teams for their tireless commitment in achieving this performance. Catherine, back over to you.

Thank you very much, Judith. Before taking your questions, Just a very brief summary of the key message. Indeed, we have posted very strong nine-month results. We are upgrading our full-year guidance. We've made significant, timely progress towards the execution of our strategic plan. And maybe as a last comment, just to reaffirm my conviction that Engie's core capabilities, assets, integrated business models, position the group very strongly to successfully navigate what is today unprecedented environment that the energy industry is facing with a very sharp focus to execute and to create value. Thank you very much for your attention, and we can now open the lines for questions.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 1. We'll take the first question from Vincent Ariel at JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Yes, good evening, and thank you for this presentation. Very strong results. We expected the energy to be very well on track to be the guidance, but maybe not having increased the guidance ahead of the election, so that shows quite a bit of confidence. So two questions as we need to reframe ourselves here. One is a very simple one, the asset rotation. It's a question that keeps coming. You had, I would say, a fantastic track record. where they're looking at Suez, GRT-Gas, and now Equance. So the disposal program has been delivered extremely well. It's almost done, a few extra bits. Now the question for the market is their investment. So here you showed that you've done more than 90% of your CapEx organically. There are some useful, for example, that Angie is looking at earlier in the in Spain, but could you confirm again, if I understood properly, that large M&A, transformational M&A, is not on the agenda? I believe that's an important message for the market, and whether you consider large M&A, give us a threshold if you can. That would be great. If I have to pick and choose a second question, it will be regarding nuclear energy. We're not talking taxonomy here. We're talking about the life extensions. So you say that basically given the coalition position in Belgium last year, you decided that it was too late actually to do investment for life extensions. So you recognize that in the P&L. But the current situation is stressing to every government around that that an energy transition can raise secure supply issues. So what is the situation there? Are they potentially changing their mind or not? Would you stick to your guns? How does that work? And the key for Engie now is the capping of the liabilities on nuclear. I would call it German style. So we've been discussing them for a while. What is the update you can provide us on the Belgian nuclear, please? So that's question number two. Thank you.

All right, Vincent. Thank you for the question. So maybe I will start by commenting on your first question. which is both on our disposal program as well as our reinvestment program. So you're right to say that we are progressing really well in our disposal program. We still have a few you know, themes that are still not complete. And here I would highlight, you know, our decarbonization plan. So, you know, we have a coal exit plan, which is going to take us a little bit more time. We have announced 2025 and 2027 for the rest of the world, 2025 for Europe. So we still have a bit of work to do, but you're right to say that we have moved that pace, and indeed we are very, very pleased with what has been achieved so far. In terms of reinvestments, You know, our plan has not changed. We are very focused on indeed organic growth. We are very focused in investing in our global business unit, namely renewables and also energy infrastructure, decentralized infrastructure, and that has not changed at all. We want to reaffirm, reassert, and increase the value we bring to this project by being an industrial and an operational actor, particularly in the renewable arena. So that is some of the things we feel we have expertise, we have differentiation, and this is how we want to focus on bringing value. As well, of course, as you know, Vincent, deploying our energy management capability, which is so important as the mix is diversifying and the energy systems are becoming more and more complex, our ability to manage energy is frankly very, very differentiated. So we are putting all this together, focusing our growth indeed on organic capability, on key geographies, which obviously doesn't exclude us to look in a very opportunistic manner at a bolt-on potential inorganic target, which would completely fulfill the criteria that we have set, which is a complement to our strong geographical presence in a key market, which would help us build a complementary asset portfolio for which Both our industrial and operational capabilities would add value, as well as, again, the energy management capability would also add value. And that would be some of the criteria. And to that, of course, I would add written criteria, which is very, very important. And there is a lot of discussions around renewables targets. Is it competitive? It's not competitive. we would be looking at targets project by project in a very, very selective manner to make sure that if we go for one, it fits all these criteria. So again, aligned with our strategy, we can fully play our role as an industrial and operational actor. It adds something to our portfolio, very important, our energy management portfolios, And, of course, meets our return criteria, and that would be some of the criteria that we would do, the only criteria that we would go for if we were to do inorganic growth. But, again, many organic growth, very selective inorganic targets. And moving now to your second topic, so switching gears a little bit, on Belgium. So a couple of things. Obviously, our position on nuclear is strong. obviously unchanged, and we've always said that the time we need to go for a full-fledged extension program is about five years. The law in Belgium today is calling for the end of nuclear activities by 2025, and as we are getting into 2022 soon, that window of five years has basically expired. That doesn't mean indeed that the discussion around security of supply in Belgium is not quite vivid. I'm sure that you have followed, for example, the CRM auction results, which were very positive for Engie, by the way, because we secured two projects, a new gas project, the ability to construct two CCGTs, which is very good news, but it is true that one of the two projects is still pending a permit. So there is a bit of a question mark about the ability to go ahead with that project. So we're dealing with this situation now. And then we also secured some CRM scheme under existing capabilities. So overall, the outcome of the CRM was very positive for Engie. But of course, the questions on permits is going to be very important to make sure that we can resolve that in order to move ahead with the project. Next question.

We'll now take the next question from James Brand at Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Well, hello, good evening, and well done, the very strong results. I'll start off, there might be three questions, I guess. I'll start off with one that might kind of stretch into two, just following on from Vantan's questions on reinvestment. And I guess a lot of people are focusing on renewables at the moment. And I was wondering when you, I guess a couple of parts, when you think about your renewable business, do you see your ambitions as being regional or global? Because you have very strong renewable business in some markets. You're strong in the US, you're strong in France. There are other markets that you're strong in as well. Are you content with just sticking to a few markets, or do you want to really be very big in a global way on renewables? And secondly, if that is your ambition, do you feel like you can expand globally, organically, or do you think it is important to do both on acquisitions to gain a kind of presence in markets that you're not in already? So that's the first one. on reinvestment. And then I was wondering just in terms of the results, if you could focus. Sometimes you can have some gas gains. I'm sure your gas business has done quite well in the current environment. So maybe you could just tell us, quantify for us if there are some gains coming through there or not. Thank you.

We need you, sorry, James, you need to repeat the second question because we couldn't hear you well.

The question on the gas side. So the question is, can you hear me okay now? The question on the gas side is, did you make any gains in Q3 in the gas trading business? And if you could quantify those.

Okay. All right. Thank you. So very, very clear answer. We are very focused for our renewable business in our key markets. We believe local presence is a lever of differentiation and competitiveness, and we want to build on local presence. We think it's very, very difficult to be competitive in a market where you've not been before and to start, you know, developing one technology. We really believe in making sure that we have a diversified portfolio in our key markets, and that is very central to our renewable deployment strategy, if you like. So key markets, and, you know, we've listed them. So in Western Europe, Latin America with strong focus on Brazil, a bit of Chile, Peru, and then U.S. are some of the key markets that we're really focusing on renewables. Of course, offshore is a little bit different. Offshore is a little bit more global, so we almost consider offshore as a region to a certain extent, but for the typical onshore wind and solar, think very focused key markets. where we can really build on our presence, also our understanding of local constraints. As you know, renewable development is a lot about stakeholder management locally, permitting environmental assessment, social acceptance, et cetera, all of this, which is very, very local. And then, of course, managing constructions and activities of that kind also need to be, I mean, are largely at risk when you have a local presence. So, yeah, very, very much key markets, local presence. And at the same time, we are deploying, and I'm very pleased with the way the GBU is doing this. We are an industrial machine, and so we want to be very global as far as expertise and relationship with procurement and industrial capability very locally in our approach to the project, stakeholder management, et cetera. So I hope that makes sense. Okay, I suspect that it makes sense. So I move to the second question, which was around gas trading gains in Q3. Benefit from overall volatility. So in terms of CCGTs and the performance of our CCGTs, what has happened in this business is obviously ancillary services which tend to be called upon in high volatility and also when renewables are a big share of the production are actually called upon. So CCGTs in general did quite well. uh in the first nine months of the year obviously uh in terms of power price and the tailwind that power price has given to most of our assets ccgt gets a little bit less because obviously you know the clean spark spread are the drivers for ccgt results and of course you know with the gas price um being very high you know there was a bit of pressure there in terms of overall margin but i'd say you know in terms of ancillary services They were called upon quite a lot, and this overall is a positive for ACGT's results.

Gas trading business, in the other line, sometimes you can get some big swings there when you have commodity price volatility. Have you seen any, or did you see in Q3 in that business?

Obviously, volatility, you know, with the talent we have in our energy commercialization business, you know, volatility tends to be something that is a positive. And so, yes, you know, we did some tailwinds from that as well.

Great.

Thank you very much.

We'll now take the next question from AJ Patel at Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Evening. It's a presentation, and congratulations on the numbers. Mine are a little bit, my questions are a little bit more granular, but they're just around that one topic. So at the presentation slides, you highlighted a GFOM ruling in Brazil, also a reversal of a 2020 positive one-off, And then I wanted to ask, can you just quantify those numbers roughly? And then the second question is, what was the expectation for DBSO? Just so that I can get a better idea of just the moving parts, please.

I'll just make a comment on the fact that, as you know, in Brazil, the regulation is very strong and there is a mechanism that allows to compensate the operator for extension of concession. So we have a bit of a positive tailwind in this year that Judith will give you a bit more color on. And the second question was on DBSO. And DBSO expectations, so while we don't necessarily give the granularity of the number, you can expect it this year to be a little bit less than 2020, just because, you know, as we presented in May, you know, our model is shifting to a bit more DBOO than DBSO. And therefore, you know, the margins of DBSO will be a little bit less than 2020. And if I remember from the top of my head in 2020, I think we had said it was around 100 million in terms of DBSO margins. So expect that to be a little bit less in 2021. And Judith, you want to comment on GFOM?

Yes, so on the DBTOs indeed to expect about half of that quite frankly is a good assumption as we start to consolidate much more of our renewals as you know as per our strategy that was laid out. First of all, you know, I just want to reiterate what great news this is because it really shows the constructive nature of the Brazilian regulator. And so this is to catch up on past costs and out-of-merit order, basically production to save water. So we are looking at a number in the third quarter year to date of roughly $150 million. So it is quite a significant positive for us that we're very happy that we were able to get this together with the other energy companies in Brazil.

Fantastic. Thank you.

We'll now take the next question from Rob Pullen at Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hey, thank you. I think my key question was just answered in terms of explaining the other line. So let's try a different tack. It appears that the Belgium supply margins were negative, and that's why the supply business was certainly – well, supply result was less than perhaps we had hoped for. I was just wondering what was driving that and whether that's going to be recurring or how sustainable that might be. And given everyone's having a couple of bites of the cherry, may I ask on the disposal plan, it seems now largely complete in terms of your quantum of proceeds you're seeking, with, as you said, a few more assets still to go. Is there scope to do more? And how would you think about the capital proceeds above the $9 billion to $10 billion targeted could be reallocated?

Thank you very much.

Okay, yeah, thank you. Thanks for the question. So in terms of Belgian supply, you have to remember that Belgium government has developed or deployed social tariffs to cope with the COVID situation and to help households the most in need. And the social tariffs is a vehicle that they have extended actually to help those same households to be coping with a higher power price and energy price. So we, you know, our supply margins were a little bit affected by the social tariff extension during that period. In terms of disposal plan completed, more proceeds, and what we are going to do with the proceeds to be, you know, we obviously, again, you know, very pleased with the way our disposal plan is going. As you know, we have put a plan together announced in May of about 9 to 10 billion euros disposal with a 15 to 16 billion euros investment program. What we will do in February, we'll come back to you with obviously a new MTP with an horizon of 2024, and we'll update the numbers. Obviously, very pleased now with the way the transaction is panning out, so we will update the numbers. But I think Very importantly, the key principles that we presented to you are not going to be very different. They will not change. That we are going to be investing to accelerate our investments, particularly in renewable, particularly in energy distributed infrastructures business. About 40 to 45 percent, you know, we have said for our 15 to 16 billion euros investment. And as we update our investment program over the next period, you should not see much, a huge departure from the type of percentage, if you like. So, yes, the absolute figure might vary. Also, we'll take into account, obviously, a new outlook for 2024. Obviously, a lot of change in terms of commodity price, et cetera. So we'll give you this new outlook. We'll update our disposal program, but more importantly, our investment program. However, the key principles will not change.

That's great. And if I could just clarify maybe with Judith this other line. So at the half year, you were, I think, 122 million lower year over year than first half 2020. And now at nine months, you are 194 million better than nine months 2020. So there's about a 320 million delta difference. which has occurred in the third quarter. Could you just quantify, and apologies if I didn't hear it before, how much of that 300 million delta is this Brazilian one-off, or whether there's any trading benefit in there as well? Thank you.

Thank you for that question. The Brazilian chief fund would be in the renewables line, because it's related to renewables mostly, or 100%, quite frankly, hydro. And so what you see in other is indeed an improvement. Trading has performed well in the third quarter. And, you know, it was said earlier, of course, in a time of volatility is when you have the best impact. And that really is the bulk of that improvement. Okay.

That's pretty clear. Thank you. I'll turn it over.

We'll now take the next question from Peter Crampton at Barclays. Please go ahead.

Good evening and congratulations. I think one needs to go back many, many years to see two guidance upgrades in one year. Two questions, if I may, because there have been so many kind of questions around full year 2021 guidance. Can you maybe provide a bit more color what's driven the second upgrade? How much of this is power prices and Belgian nuclear related? How much are kind of true one-offs? That would be the first question. And then the second one relates to your kind of midterm financial guidance, which you obviously provided 18th of May. We've had two upgrades since. Can we expect for the full year results kind of an update of your kind of midterm guidance? And would this be based on kind of a market to market of kind of end of year power prices? Thank you.

Yes. Yes. And thank you for your question. So one of the key things you have to look at to understand, you know, the second revision for us is you really have to look at the power price toward 2021. And you will see an extremely, extremely sharp increase. unprecedented, I think is the word, that qualifies actually. And that all happened in H2. So very, you know, and that was towards the end of July. I think that was fairly end of July, and then it really peaked. So that explains to you why, you know, we have had such indeed a dynamic, very, very dynamic year indeed, and a very specific timing situation that explains that. In terms of guidance, so yes, we will come back in February. We will give you an updated outlook to 2024. So, you know, we'll go, we stay on this three-year rolling forecast type of approach. Obviously, we are already anticipating some tailwinds from the commodity price that we are seeing. We have given, by the way, you know, as usual, hedging volumes hedging percentages as well as captured price which you know if you want to calculate using normalized volumes you can and estimate that impact but again you know that would be a the isolated impact of commodity price on the hedge volume and of course you would also have to take into account as you know that the nuclear volume next year will be less given the fact that one of the nuclear trench will be shut down in October 2022. So there are some, you know, but in general, yes, absolutely tailwinds there. And so, yeah, we will be redefining, you know, both, you know, our 2022 view as well as our horizon to 2024 to take into account, you know, both that commodity price new reality and, as well as, of course, as we've mentioned, in terms of investment program, the fact that we've done well on a disposal plan.

Okay, excellent. Thank you very much for the answers.

We'll take the next question from Emmanuel Turpin at Society General. Please go ahead.

Hello, good evening. My first question is on equants, and it's going to be to some extent a backward-looking question as you very successfully are in the process of selling it. As a measure of the quality of your past investments, I was wondering if you could share with us the capital gain you are looking at booking on this transaction. We know the industrial capital employed at 3.8 billion, but we don't have the book value. That would be an interesting data point. to showcase past investments. The second question is on the reorganization of your operations along the global business units that you mentioned in your exposé. I guess the new management teams are in place for these global business units and whether you use the GBU renewables, which is very dynamic, or another Are you able to share with us any real-life example of what makes this new organization better, almost on a day-to-day basis? Any example, putting any color on the new organization would be very helpful. Thank you very much.

Yes, of course, Emmanuel, but you need to give me a lot of time because I have actually a number of examples. that actually comfort us in the fact that this GBU reorganization is paying off. And, you know, you quoted renewables. I think it is where it probably is the most striking. But, you know, in energy solution as well where, you know, we are, for example, developing and defining very, very specific KPI for the different business, and making sure that these KPIs are harmonized throughout our geography so we're able to have a much, much, much better granularity of the performance of each of the businesses, having benchmarks and emulation and being able to compare similar businesses between each other and therefore drive improvement, which, you know, as you know, Emmanuel, when you had the multi-activity business unit, everything was mixed up and we didn't have this granularity. And now, you know, we're doing our QBR, quarterly business review, with each of the GBU, and we are looking at their KPIs, which are operational, specific to their global business units, and that is now being standard for them. So, I mean, huge difference. I would also add, you know, on procurement, I know I talk a lot about procurement, but this is really where it's an area where I'm the most excited about in terms of almost quick wins. We are aligning a procurement organization with a global business unit, and we are able to work with our suppliers, for example, on wind turbine, on solar PV, you know, in an environment where there is a lot of talk about inflation and logistics, et cetera. very centralized, high-level engagement with suppliers is very, very, very important to the risk operation. And that's some of the examples. And, again, you know, I could go on for ages. But, you know, I'm respectful of everyone's time this evening. And then, you know, you asked the question on capital gains. So we have not disclosed that information. I'm sure we will in due time. You know, it's a bit early for us to do that. I mean, the thing that is most important about Equence is the value that the candidates have seen with Equence is high, and it is a testimony of the potential and the upsides that Equence has, both in terms of market alignment, capabilities, and also performance improvement. by having a very, very dedicated, granular approach to this service business, which we've always said was very different and needed to have a very specific approach. So we're obviously very, very pleased with Equance, and the potential that candidates are seeing in that business is indeed very promising.

Thank you very much.

We'll take the next question from Louis Bouchard at Odo. Please go ahead.

Yes, good evening, everyone. Thank you for taking my question. And congratulations, of course, for increasing your guidance again. um my first question would be maybe on aolia because you are remote to have won but anyway it's sure that you have made an offer on it apparently with a price which is close to 2 billion euros would like to know how it fits with your strategy do you see the spanish market as a core business for you after the acquisition of the hydrodome concession one year ago and if you see a further development here not only with hydrogen or eventually supply business that could be developed in this specific market considering that it seems to be of interest to you it seems to make a lot of sense with your general comments regarding the renewable development but more specifically in this market what are the key points that you would like to highlight regarding these operations My second question would be regarding the thermal business and more specifically the clean spark spread. We have touched a little bit of this a few minutes ago, but maybe to have some idea on where we could go next year in 2022 because currently it's clear that the clean spark spread are a bit more under pressure because of the gas market situation. It is possible that this year you've benefited from ancillary services and one of as well in thermal business, which have helped a little bit thermal. And even in spite of it, thermal was a bit under pressure. So what shall we expect for next year? Shall we expect that maybe your captured spark spread for the next few years might be a bit more under pressure, meaning eventually some downward pressure on the thermal that could be expected? That's my second question. Thank you very much.

Okay, so let me start with the first one. Obviously, I won't comment on any rumor or any specific deal. But what I would say, though, is that in terms of approach to our key markets, we will be always, as I've mentioned earlier, looking at developing a renewable capability as part of an integrated platform where we can really leverage as skills and expertise in energy management. And in Spain, and if I look at the Iberian platform, it's actually quite an integrated platform. What we have done last year in terms of hydro, which is the transaction that you mentioned, is giving us this very nice base load flexible asset that we can integrate to what we're doing already. in terms of renewable developments in that Iberian platform. So that's a very interesting region for us. And whatever we do, we would always be looking at the integration of complementary assets, as well as obviously bringing an industrial and operational role, which is very, very important in the way we want to develop our projects, whether new projects or inorganic opportunities. And then the second question was on the SPAC spread being under pressure. So look, we obviously will come back to you more precisely, right, in February 2022. Obviously, you know, it's such a high volatility right now that it's very, very difficult to predict. So we'll give you a better visibility in 2022 when we come back. I mean, the key thing and very fundamentally, the role of the CCGT in Western Europe is almost only gaining in importance, right? You have to remember in Europe this winter, in Germany alone, there will be three gigawatts of nuclear taken off and about one gigawatt of coal taken off the system. So there's going to be pressure on our CCGT, which are very flexible assets, can be dispatched, et cetera. So we expect that CCGT to continue to play a very, very important role as the whole European energy mix is being transformed.

Thank you very much.

We'll now take the next question from Peter Bastida at Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hi, good evening. Two questions from me. So firstly, I was wondering if you could expand a little bit on, you know, you mentioned imparting supply chain and cost inflation issues. Can you just talk a little bit more about that, what you're experiencing on the ground at the moment in your renewables business, and in particular, have you had to delay or cancel any solar projects? And then my second question, I guess, kind of relates to that a little bit, is what trends in PPA prices have you been seeing? And maybe if you can compare and contrast between regions, that would be helpful.

Yes. Okay. So, yeah. A bit of logistic tension, I think, across the world. I think no sector is immune to that. Our organization, renewable organization, is working through this logistical hurdle in a very, very nice manner. A couple of projects are affected. We're seeing a couple of delays, but frankly, nothing meaningful, nothing that make us Things that are targets the targets that we've talked to you about are going to be put at risk. We're managing the situation very well And again, you know here this centralized organization is also able to make sure that we make the right trade-offs That we make you know the right We take the right we give the right priority to the right project and and this is happening you in a very dynamic manner of and in a very professional manner. So frankly, no meaningful impact. Obviously, we are strictly monitoring it, and I would leave it to that.

And maybe if you allow me to add for now, I think what's important to know also is on the seven gigawatt of assets under construction, we have locked in the prices. And so that is obviously giving us a lot of confidence in the fact that at this stage, no major impact from inflation on renewables.

And my question, PPA prices?

There is obviously strong support in green PPA these days. for many different reasons. You know, decarbonization commitment from all of our customers and, you know, energy supply is one of their main and fastest way to decarbonize their scope. So obviously have very high demand in green PPA. And obviously PPA is also enabling customers to give more predictability and more stability to the energy price. when today's volatility for the people who didn't have the right protection is frankly putting some of their operations at risk. So if you look at that, we see a positive trend, good support, and some increase in general. If we could generalize, we are seeing a bit of an upward trend in PPA price. And just as a reminder, obviously at Engie we are very, very active in green PPAs, where we have signed this year 1.9 gigawatts in the first nine months, 1.9 gigawatts of green PPAs, and that is up even versus last year for the full year. So both demand and price is going in the right direction, and we're very pleased because we are so well positioned on that.

Okay, thanks very much.

The last question of the day will be from Hon Rodriguez at Kepa. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you. Yeah, our key questions have been answered, but I would like to come back again to the gas price phase in France. Can you please walk us through energy's neutral impact? Should we expect negative working cap for 2021, maybe in 2022? And especially, what is the compensation mechanism discussed for now? or regulated tariffs in France, as normally they're expected to end on mid-23, but normally the catch-up tariffs is passed during the summer period, so it would be interesting to see this. Thank you.

Yeah, so good to remind everyone that the government took this measure indeed to freeze the gas tariff in order to protect, obviously, the households from this high volatility in the market. And the government has been actually working very actively in defining the modality of how the suppliers, and particularly ENGIE, would be compensated from these tariff fees. And a mechanism has been defined, in fact, defined in great level of detail for an amendment which is going through the whole approval process. It was voted at the assembly, at the lower house, I think last Friday. So it's moving along, which is fantastic. And the terms of the amendments are such that we will not see if voted, obviously it needs to be voted, but we are very, at this stage, because of that first vote being positive, we are optimistic and we are positive that it will get voted through. So when voted through, we'll be able to recognize revenue and therefore no P&L impact in 2021, in 2022. So that's very good. As far as working cap is concerned, in terms of cash reimbursement, the terms are actually still being worked out. So the modality of the cash impact is not quite completely clarified. Work in progress, but obviously this is something that, you know, at Engie we definitely can manage and will manage. I don't know, Judith, if you wanted to add to my answer, if I missed something.

No, I think it was very clear. Just to give you a sense of our confidence on... on being held whole here, we will be able to book a trade receivable on the French state and thus have no P&L impact this year. That's how firm this is now becoming. And on the cash flow, like Catherine said, we're still working out the exact mechanism Of course, like you said, some of the regulated customers will go away. This is when also the state will come in. So some of that is still being worked out. So I think you need to assume there's some sort of spreading over the next couple of years, really. But on the whole, we're being kept whole, which is great news. That really is a very strong assumption that we have at this stage. And, of course, if there was a working capital delay of sorts, then we have a very strong liquidity to work this out and make sure that it happens. It is not an issue for the company.

Thank you.

Okay, I think that ends our call. I would like to thank everyone for participating despite the late... late timing and enjoy and have a very nice evening, everyone. Thank you very much. Bye-bye.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes this conference call. And we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.