This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
4/22/2026
Good afternoon. This is the conference operator. Welcome and thank you for joining the GTT first quarter 2026 activity update conference call. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Anyone wishing to ask a question may press star and one on the telephone. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. François Michel, the company's CEO. Please go ahead, sir.
Good afternoon everyone and welcome to GCT's activity update for the first quarter of 2026. I am sitting here in Paris with Thierry Ochoa, our CFO, and together we will walk you through the usual key business highlights, but also our revenue for the first quarter. The agenda for the presentation today is the usual one. I am sure that you have noticed that we now go with a new setup, hence a first introductory point to further explain what lies behind the one JTT brand. I will then provide you with a business update for our key activities, meaning the JTT Energy and JTT Marine divisions. Thierry will elaborate on our revenue for the first quarter, and I will then share with you closing remarks before we can open the floor to your questions. So, first, the wanted GTT grants. This new organization, which is ours, emphasizes the fact that GTT is now at a turning point. following the very successful acquisition of Danelec last year and taking into account our ambition which we have explained to further develop the core business but also associated services. It was very important for us and for our customers to bring all teams together under a clear vision but also a clear structure. So the creation of two divisions, GTT Energy on the one hand and GTT Marine on the other, thus provides greater clarity on our activities to our customers and to our staff. It fosters the execution of our strategy to, of course, keep the core business running, but also to ensure the success of our service approach to the shipping industry, in particular in the LNG. I have already set very clear operational targets for these two divisions. For GTT Energy, it is three priorities. Accelerate innovation, strengthen our service offer and revamp our LNG as a fuel and onshore offers. For GTT Marine, the priority is to deliver on the synergies combining the hardware and software solutions that we have known in this division and you will see the first results of this strategy. We have also put in place a hub of advanced technologies to put together under the same roof all breakthrough technologies and venture capital. Let's turn now to our first activity, GTC Energy, very much in line with our expectations and with the messages that I had delivered at the annual results and in line with the growing need for new LNG carriers. In Q1, our order intake continued its upward trend We have announced 29 LNGC orders in the first quarter. It marks our second best Q1 commercial performance after the 2022 record year. We are close to that level. We have also received two orders for very large FN carriers, each of 100,000 cubic meters capacity, and one onshore storage tank. This momentum, which I had announced, has continued despite the situation in the Middle East. We have registered eight LNGC orders just in March, and the momentum, I can tell you, continues to date in April. We are, of course, closely monitoring the current situation in the Middle East. To date, and I will come back to this point, this conflict has no direct impact on GTC's business activity, meaning on orders and on deliveries. And if you look at deliveries, year to date, in Q1, 20-22 LNGC have been delivered versus 23 last year, so a level which is totally equivalent. So let's turn to the impact of the current situation in the Middle East on LNG global production capacity. As we all know, the closing of the Strait of Hormuz has heavily disrupted the energy and the shipping markets, because about 20% of production volumes are not available today. But if I now look at the production capacity, today only about 3% of the production capacity in LNG has been damaged with the drone attacks on Ratlafan. As you know, two liquefaction trains have been hit. We know that this infrastructure will restart. It will take perhaps a couple of years. Some people say between three and five years. It could be faster than that, but who knows. I would like to underline, however, a couple of things. First of all, the situation does not slow down or undermine the need for new vessels to export future volumes associated to FIDs. If I look at the additional capacity which is expected to come online by 2030, It represents 180 million tons per annum of additional capacity, which is 40% more than the production level today, most of this coming from the USA. And of course, all of this will require new vessels. If I look at the FIDs that can come on top of this already high level of FIDs that have been taken, you have the list on the screen. The list of FIDs that are likely to be taken this year or in 2027 confirms the greater exposure of the overall LNG production to the USA and to other regions than the Middle East. And as a reminder, this year, 23 million tonnes per annum of FIDs have been taken, including in Qatar and in the USA, and we start the year after a record level in 2025. Now, if we look at the shipping routes and the shipping intensity, what you see is that the war confirms that energy security risks will remain persistent. Indeed, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz calls for greater flexibility to ensure energy security, and all this at the most reasonable price possible. And we know that some countries with significant exposure to Qatar, such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, I could mention Taiwan, Singapore, Korea, China, but also in Europe, Italy, will need to diversify their source of LNG. So looking ahead, what we anticipate is that We anticipate that heightened scrutiny on the LNG supply diversification, which could possibly result into a higher shipping intensity over the long run. But we also anticipate the need to create more buffers in the LNG capacity in storage in particular. Now, let's move on to our second activity, QCT Marine. The GCT Marine Division won new contracts, very good contracts, both in the performance solution and in the safety units. As for safety, GCT Marine has secured new accreditation from two new oil majors, which is a prerequisite to expand its addressable offshore fleet. Very good news. we start to leverage our broad customer base to sell more of the systems in performance, so for performance solutions, meaning adding performance and voyage optimization to initial data collection. And consistent with this strategy, we have in particular signed a new contract, a very good contract with Petrobras, a new customer to equip up to 120 vessels with combined hardware and software solutions. Third point for this new division, the integration of Danelec in the GTT group is progressing as planned and we are well on track to deliver the synergies that we have announced. Let me now hand over to Thierry Ochoa, our CFO.
Thank you, François. Good afternoon, everyone. Now, moving on to the financial part of the presentation, let's start with the order book, continuing the commercial dynamic seen in the fourth quarter of 2025. GTC recorded a total of 32 orders, in the first quarter of 2026. They include 29 orders for new LNG carriers and two VLEC, very large lithium carriers, and one onshore storage. Their delivery is scheduled between the second quarter of 2028 and the fourth quarter of 2029. This is our second best first quarter commercial performance. Over the period, 22 LNG cars were delivered, a similar level with the first quarter of 2025 around, not around, but 23 LNG cars delivered last year for the first quarter. Finally, our backlog at the end of Q1 2026 remains very solid with 297 units for the core business and 46 units for LNG as fuel. Let's look into more details at the revenue by activity at the end of Q1 2026. Total revenues at 193 million euros are up 1% compared to Q1 2025, and driven by new bills standing at 173 million euros, meaning minus 4% compared to last year, and mainly impacting from lower order intake in 2025. Driven by revenues from services increased by 28% at 5.4 million thanks to a higher level of assistance to vessels in operations and pre-engineering studies. Regarding GTT marine, revenues increased by 208% thanks to the contribution of DANELEC acquired last July. I now hand the floor back to François for the outlook and the key takeaways.
Thank you Thierry. So, in the absence of any significant order delays or cancellations, we can confirm today our 2026 objectives. Our estimated 2026 consolidated revenue ranging between 740 million and 780 million euros. Our estimated EBITDA ranging between 490 and 530 million euros. And of course, we can confirm that the dividend policy will remain unchanged. So a couple of takeaways after this first quarter and before we move on to your questions. The first quarter is very well in line with our expectations and I think what we had announced at the annual results. We have seen a sustained level of orders recorded at the end of 2025. continued despite the geopolitical situation and in fact even accelerated. We saw revenue for the first quarter slightly up versus last year which is somewhat good news but well on track and we also saw a growing contribution of GTT Marine with commercial wins consistent with our combined offering, combining hardware and software solutions. Again, as of today, and we are cautious, but as of today, the conflict in the Middle East has no direct impact on GTC's business activity. Thank you for your attention, and we are very happy to take your questions.
Thank you. This is the conference operator. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the telephone. To remove yourself from the question queue, please press star and two. Please pick up the receiver when asking questions. Anyone with a question may press star and one at this time. The first question is from Matt Smith of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Hi there. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. I had a couple of pleas. I think Last time we spoke, you talked to around 150 orders to come through over the next few years, perhaps the next couple of years as a result of FIDs already taken on LNG projects. I guess my question really was, have your assessment on the pace of those orders coming through, I think you referenced largely in a two-year time period, has that assessment changed at all? Does the excess of Qatari vessels make any difference to your assessment there. That would be the first one, please. And then the second one would be turning to digital or now marine. You know, you point out that this is now 7% of group revenues, so quite significant. You know, I just wondered if you could add some colour, later thinking, you know, how material could this be by 2030, perhaps in terms of group contribution, or what's the sort of growth rate that we could see with the benefit of of the acquisitions, the synergies, any additional color there would be useful, please. Thank you.
Thank you.
So regarding the pace of the order intake process, we have no information whatsoever today regarding a slowdown of the pace of those orders following the FIDs of last year, and the majority, what I can say is that the majority of the ships related to the FIDs of last year still need to be ordered. So after the end of Q1, and of course it's a little bit difficult for us to he remarks exactly for which FID the chips are ordered, sometimes we don't know, but from the 29 chips that have been ordered in the first Q1, we know that 10 ships are non-chartered, 19 ships are chartered, and from those chartered ships, only 5 are related to the FIDs from last year. So the majority of the volume that we have discussed about still needs to be ordered in the coming 2 or 3 years, with the usual uncertainty. Second, regarding digital, we are exactly on track with our budget after the first quarter. We will report on this marine division because it includes, in fact, marine hardware and digital solutions at the end of the first half of this year, and we are also on track to deliver the synergies of 25 million to 30 million expected at the end of 2030. So today, our vision is that this division, of course, without M&A, but could represent 10% to 15% of the group revenue, perhaps a little bit more, but that's the vision today. Perfect. Thank you very much.
Happy to pass on. Thank you.
The next question is from Guilherme Levy of Morgan Stoury.
Hello. Hi, Chihri. Hi, François. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one, just thinking about secondary implications to your business from the current conflict. If you think about an environment in which the oil prices stay higher for longer, How would you think that could increase demand from ship owners for performance improvement solutions on your marine business? And then, secondly, maybe a question related to that, but on LNG-SPU, what could be the potential in the first years if oil prices stay at spot over a prolonged period of time? Thank you.
Thank you for the questions, which are fast questions. In our view, over the long run, it is clear that there will be longer LNG routes and also longer periods of storage and buffer storage that will increase the need for low boil-off rate and additional performance solutions, as you point out. I am not, at least this is what we assess at the board level, I am not yet able to put specific figures based on that, but this is the trend that we see and I hope that I can give more specific indication after the first half of this year. Regarding LNG as a fuel, today We believe that the move towards energy as a fuel is primarily due to environment concerns and that this trend will continue. I have asked the teams to totally revamp our offer of systems, including to be able to have prefabricated systems delivered on the shipyards but also turnkey solutions including fully installed solutions. And so the question for us is probably less a question of market evolution than a question of penetration of our solution where I believe we can get a lot of business. So it can be very significant but it will take me a couple of quarters to revamp the offer and to present a fully revamped offer, new technology and new commercial systems before the end of the year. That's for sure.
Perfect. Thank you. Thank you.
The next question is from Richard Dawson of Barenburg. Please go ahead.
Good evening, and thank you for taking my questions. Two from me. So good to see no direct impact on GCT from the Middle Eastern conflict yet, but is there a risk that this could change if the duration of the conflict extends further? So can we maybe see some of the Middle Eastern clients asking for construction or deliveries on those vessels to pause as those LNG projects start up to delay? So particularly the Atari volumes from NFF and MFE, is that potentially at a risk? And then secondly, just going back to the structuring of the business. So what does that really mean from an operational point of view? Will there be separate management teams running GTT Energy and Marine, for example? And can we maybe get more disclosure and profitability between the two segments? Thank you.
Okay. Thank you for your questions. Regarding the direct impact, what I mean is that today, for instance, you have very indirect impacts on our ability to conduct business, such as logistic constraints to travel to the region, for instance, to engage with customers. And so, of course, if the situation were to last for a very prolonged time, at some point we could expect some logistic delays or just issues in interacting with customers or supporting the customers in the region. But it's very important to see that Today, there has been absolutely no indication whatsoever of any slowdown of construction, no cancellation of FIDs nor of ships. And to the contrary, the indications that we have received from the Qataris is that They ask more engineering companies to be able to restart as soon as possible the construction and the build-up of the capacity in Qatar so as to offset at least partly, even in the short run, the capacity that has been damaged. So we have no indication whatsoever that there is a long-term delay. If there was a delay, an impact, it would be, in my view, very indirect, such as disruptions in the supply chain, in particular in electronic components, because, you know, to deliver chips, you need electronic components, but we are not yet there, I believe so, and far from there. Second, yes, in terms of new organization, for me, it means two business units. Of course, one which is much larger than the other one as we speak, but the marine activity is a fully operational business unit with its management well in place, with clear operational priorities. We will report on the results. It has a CEO, a CFO, and a management team. Regarding GTT Energy, for the moment, because of the size of the business, In practice, I run this division myself together with the management team of the group.
That's right. Thank you. Thank you.
The next question is from Kevin Roger of Kepler Chevrolet.
Yes, thanks for taking the time. The first one is a kind of follow-up on the... order and take dynamic. Basics Q1 has been very good and you implicitly say that you still need to have a lot of orders for 2025 FID project. So do you expect in a sense to be able to replicate the Q1 commercial performance over the next few quarters just to understand what you expect as a dynamic which is quite important in a way for the share price reaction? And the second one is also on the, let's say, long-term outlook, because when we look at the implicit command that you made from the Middle East, which is basically new energy project, diversification, possible increase in vessel intensity, more buffer, etc., can you give us a bit of color on what it makes as an impact on the 10-year market outlook and If you can, in a way, precise a bit, you know, the famous 450 plus plus number that you provided at the full earnings. If you have a bit of sense or a bit more color on where you think this number can land. Thanks, Amas.
Thank you. Thank you for your questions. Regarding the order intake dynamic, as you know, we cannot guide on orders, certainly not on a quarterly basis, but explicitly, I can say that the vast majority of the ships that need to be ordered after 2025 record level of FIDs and in fact the FIDs of this year have not been ordered yet and I still expect today those ships to be ordered in the coming 2-3 years with the usual pace. So yes, I would not be surprised if the implication of that would be good quarters in the coming years. So that is mechanical. But I cannot gag on a specific level or a normalized level quarter by quarter, in particular in the current context, because you know some orders could shift from one quarter to another, and that would have no material implications regarding our medium-term business model. Regarding the need for more diversification and more buffers, we know, talking directly to governments in Asia, come back from Asia, we know that when we talk to the Indians, for instance, we know that there will be more buffers from those countries, meaning more storage. This is clear, so there will be more floating storage and more onshore storage, more strategic storage of LNG in the region, but also a need to diversify the sources of gas. If you take a country like India, 60% of the Indian gas is coming today from the Middle East. It's of course a situation that must be controlled with more buffers but also with more diverse routes. And so that implies a number of additional ships to be ordered over the medium term. That is our assessment today. And this effect is material, so it's not a marginal effect on the overall volume of ships. Now, can I revise the overall estimate of how many ships will need to be ordered over the next decade? We of course have an idea, but it would be It's not cautious for us to release the figure today in the midst of the crisis in the Middle East. And so we will do it most likely, I believe, in the first half of next year when the crisis is over and when the situation is completely stabilized. Because we're looking at a long-term question.
Thank you.
The next question is from Henry Patrickot of UBS.
Yes, hello everyone, thank you for the update. Two questions from my side. The first one, pulling up on LNG as a fuel, just wondering if you can give some comments on the outlook for all this for this year. I mean, you mentioned that you're in the middle of revamping your offers, so does that imply that we should expect many orders this year, perhaps more coming next year? And then secondly, to follow up on the comments on the long-term outlook, do you have any concern that the current events and disruption to energy flows coming quite soon after the disruption that we saw back in 2022 with the Russia-Ukraine war could have a negative impact on the long-term on energy demand as to fuel is perhaps not seen as reliable. As we've heard, it could be for some of the buyers. Thank you.
Thank you. We are working on a good number of projects for LNG as a fuel as we stand today. So we have a good technology which many shipyards can use and so we are working very actively. What is true is that we would like to increase the penetration further because we know that in the majority of cases LNG as a fuel can be used with a membrane containment system which is not our historical market share. So it is more, let's say, a plan to win aggressively market share in this year. And yes, of course, I expect an acceleration of the sales between this year, next year and the year after. So yes, that's totally true. Second, regarding the long-term outlook, For me the question is less the question of energy, but it is the question of investments in the Middle East. The Middle East in general has been seen as a heaven, as a very safe place to invest, not only for energy, but also in a couple of other areas. It's clear that people will take a buffer when they source energy from the Middle East, not only gas, but what we tried to show in the presentation is that in fact the largest dynamic that we see in the coming years is indeed coming from the USA and so we see that the implications, the overall implications of the situation can be a much more diverse source of LNG, much less concentrated. Clearly no country is buying 100% of their gas from a single country, whatever is this country. but also longer shipping routes and more buffers. This is our situation now. I have not heard of any country, in particular in Asia, which is the largest dynamic in the month, that they are thinking about not investing anymore in gas. That's not at all the situation today. It's not the situation.
Okay, thank you. Thank you.
The next question is from Jamie Franklin of Jefferies.
Hi there, I promised to take my question, just one left from me. So if I look at your order intake through the first quarter, obviously about half of those were announced prior to Middle East conflict escalation, about half after that during March and onwards. But presumably a lot of these were already in advanced stages of discussion prior to the conflict. Could you help us get a sense of kind of how many of the 1Q orders were from discussions that started post-conflict? or in other words if you've seen any sort of acceleration or deceleration in inquiries for new orders. Thanks.
Thank you, it's a good question. The majority of those orders, of course, have been discussed for a couple of weeks or a couple of months, in fact. So the cycle for us is long and we don't see any deceleration of the discussions regarding the pace of orders and so we don't expect a slowdown of orders in the coming quarters.
And it doesn't answer your question. I hope it doesn't. Yeah, that's perfect. Thank you. Thank you.
As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one on your telephone. The next question is from Jean-Luc Romain of CIC CIV.
Thank you for touching my question. I got two. The first is about the adoption of your new GTT-NEXT technology. In light of the evolving needs of your customers and your clients, do you see this technology as possibly adopted faster? And the second question is regarding the map you show on slide 10. I don't like it. I saw our... I'm not so sure, but I think it's overproduced, so just one question.
Okay, so over the medium term, thank you for your question, over the medium term what we believe is that if we have longer routes of shipping and in general longer storage, And people will invest in general on systems with a low boil-off rate. And as you know, NextOne has been developed as a platform, in fact, to reach very, very low levels of boil-off. So we believe that the overall environment is conducive to an acceleration of low boil-off rate systems, including NextOne.
Yes. Regarding your second question, no matter.
Okay, fine. Thank you. Thank you.
The last question is from Jean-Francois Grandjean of Odo Vichesse.
Yes, Colin, you have probably already answered my two questions. Nevertheless, I will come back on the first one on the Middle East, taking into account the situations. Do you expect a slowdown for the future FID, I think, for the ship owner? It's not very interesting to invest immediately on a new vessel, a new LNG system. So I do expect some potential risk to see a slowdown for the future orders with probably lower FIDs from the Middle East area. And the second question, I will come back on the LNG as a fuel. You mentioned the press release, some more and more competition. So could you explain more or give us some more clarity about that? What do you expect and do you consider that it would be more difficult to develop your own membrane technology? And are you more cautious regarding the trend expected for your business in this market? Thank you.
So thank you for your questions. On the Middle East, what I think is important to see is that, of course, for, let's say, consumers of energy, in particular in the Asia-Pacific, but also from the Middle East perspective, it is a crisis, but for other continents, in particular for the US and for exporters of energy, which are not In the Middle East, this crisis is a very unfortunate thing, but it is an opportunity. And so, if anything, we don't see at all a slowdown of orders of LNGC. We don't anticipate it from the non-Middle East part, if you want. We also don't anticipate a slowdown in FIDs from the non-Middle East part. There will be, in the short run, volatility and uncertainty regarding everything that comes out of the Middle East, meaning FIDs but also LNGC orders perhaps in the very short run. But beyond those short-term effects, what we anticipate is that it will be more than compensated by additional investments outside of the Middle East. Regarding your second question, LNG as a fuel, What I think is, first of all, the trend towards LNG as a fuel will continue again primarily for environment concerns, but also because it has really become the fuel of choice for large container ships and for cruise ships, so I don't expect any disruptions in this trend. But what we also believe is that for Many reasons, but including because of rising labor costs, lower labor availability, lower qualified labor availability, we must industrialize our membrane containment systems more to bring them in a, let's say, more easy to do business with directly to the yards. which is something that GCT has not done historically. We have been a little bit shy at, you know, providing solutions in a turnkey fashion, in a prefab fashion together with partners. And this is the core of what we are working on. And I have absolutely no doubt that, from my experience in the yard, I have no doubt about the fact that by making our solutions easier to use directly in the yard, we will increase the penetration of our solution. So I'm optimistic regarding this market.
Okay, very well. Thank you. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
There are no more questions at this time.
Thank you. Thank you all for your various questions and for your attention. We look forward to continuing the discussions with you and to seeing you soon.
Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over. You may disconnect your telephones. Thank you.
