This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
8/1/2024
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I am Mina, your chorus call operator. Welcome and thank you for joining the National Bank of Greece conference call to present and discuss the second quarter 2024 financial results. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Pablos Milonas, CEO of National Bank of Greece. Mr. Milonas, you may now proceed.
Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our second quarter 2024 financial results call. I'm joined by Christos Christodoulou, Group CFO, and Greg Papagrigoris, Group Head of IR. After my introductory remarks, Christos will go into more detail on our financial performance, and then we will turn to Q&A. Let me start by providing a brief overview of Greece's economic developments and outlook. During the first half of 2024, the Greek economy has remained on a solid footing, with growth spearheaded by a strong tourism and supported by resilient domestic demand. Specifically, Greece's GDP growth accelerated in the first quarter to over 2%, recovering strongly from the slowdown witnessed in late 2023 due to the floods. Let me describe some of the key factors driving activity. strengthened fixed capital formation, up by 9% year-on-year as regards the corporate sector, to a total of 14.8% of GDP on an annualized basis. Moreover, foreign investors' interest in the country remains high, with FDI heading for another strong year, following approximately $20 billion of inward FDI during the past three years. FDI is attracted by political stability, and solid economic fundamentals including a primary budget surplus of 2% of GDP. Such strong investment prospects point to continued robust demand for corporate loans. Second, support from private consumption due to a further improvement in the labor market comprising both employment growth of 2.5% approximately as well as rising employee compensation in real terms, 2.5% as well. Third, the residential real estate market remains buoyant with price increases of over 10% so far this year. The growth momentum in real estate prices is expected to continue in the medium term in view of the sustained supply store shortages combined with rising demand for residential real estate. The labor market and the real estate market together should support household loan demand going forward. Fourth, the tourist season is expected to break all records with annual revenue at $23 billion and arrivals increasing at a double-digit pace for a fourth consecutive year. Fifth, leading indicators point to a further strengthening in business and investment activity. Of special note, economic sentiment has edged up to a two-year high, and capacity utilization rates, which bode well for investment, are at multi-year highs. Overall, we expect GDP growth to be near 2.5% in 2024. Now let me turn to the first half of 2024 results of the Bank. In this positive economic environment, combined with the accomplishments from our ambitious and still ongoing five-year transformation, as well as the inherent comparative advantages of our balance sheet and our technology, the Bank's performance has continued to perform well across all key metrics. In terms of profitability, we have delivered a first-half group Core PAT of $646 million, up 27% year-on-year, comparing very favorably with our full-year 2024 Initial Core Profit Guidance of $1.2 billion. In fact, our second quarter 2024 Core PAT was slightly higher than the first quarter, despite lower rates. This performance implies a core ROTE of 17.4% compared with our initial guidance for over 15% for the full year 2024. Among the key highlights of the quarter, which Christos will analyze in more detail shortly, NII normalization continued at a pace similar to the one in the first quarter, minus 3% Q&Q in both quarters. Important to note are the following. Drags on NII with a hedging cost of carry, which was carried in full in the second quarter, as was the full cost of the MRL issuances of the first quarter. More importantly, loan NII increased despite the negative impact of lower market interest rates, as this was offset by the impact from strong credit expansion. In fact, loan disbursements reached $2.8 billion in the second quarter, which is a multi-year record quarterly high. As a result, our performing loan book increased by a solid $1.1 billion in the second quarter. Other key highlights of our second quarter 2024 results are 1. The sustained double-digit growth in fees, up by 15% year-on-year. 2. The containment of our recurring operating costs to low single digits. And three, our cost of risk, which continues to decline, reaching 55 base points with little new gross formation flat on a net basis. Our sustained high profitability further enhanced our capital buffers, with our set one rising by 100 base points a year to date before dividend accrual for a 40% payout from this year's earnings to be paid in 2025. Our SET1 ratio at 18.3% is currently 450 base points approximately above our internal target of 14%, enhancing our strategic flexibility, including with regards to increasing shareholder remuneration. Turning to liquidity, our net cash position remained above $9 billion in June, despite the large net loan expansion, as well as the broadening shift towards mutual funds. In fact, we experienced a sizable increase in our deposits during the quarter, with a bulk of the increase comprising core deposits. The latter rose by a solid $1.3 billion quarter-on-quarter, leading to an improvement in our core to total deposit mix to close to 80% at the end of the second quarter. All these positive results continue to be recognized by rating agencies, and in early July, Moody's proceeded with a two-notch upgrade of the senior rating of NBG, now standing one notch above investment grade. Our strong first half 2024 financial results have prompted us to upgrade our full year 2024 guidance. We now expect our full year 2024 NII to exceed slightly the full year 2023 record level, reflecting a more gradual benchmark rate normalization, as well as stronger credit growth circa 1.5 billion for the full year is a new guidance up from 1.2 billion previously our confidence on delivering the revised credit growth target rests on the solid performance in the second quarter as well as on a strong corporate production pipeline i.e. approved but not yet dispersed loans which stands at approximately 2.5 billion fee growth will remain strong, while cost of risk, also positively revised, is now seen below 60 base points for full year 2024. Chiefly due to improved NII dynamics, core PAT and core return on tangible equity guidance for full year 2024 have been revised upwards to $1.3 billion and circa greater than 16%. respectively. Looking forward, our results will continue to reflect the support of macro trends and a buoyant banking environment, as well as our inherent comparative advantages. These include our transformation program, which is bringing rapid, efficient, and innovative change, most notably to our technology. In fact, our step change in technology has improved our agility and is a factor that distinguishes us. With that, I would like to pass the floor to our group CFO, Christos, who will provide additional insight to our financial performance before we turn to Q&A. Christos, the floor to you. Thank you, Pablo.
Let's start with profitability on slide 10. At age 124, core profit after tax reached 646 million, up by 27% year-on-year, implying an EPS of 1.4 euros per share, and a core return on tangible equity of 17.4% before adjusting for excess capital. The positive momentum in H1 profitability reflects core income strength driven by NII resilience up 13% year-on-year and impressive growth in fees up 15% year-on-year supported by cost discipline and a normalizing cost of risk on the part of favorable asset quality trends. Going into more detail, our Q2 NII continues to leverage a more gradual interest rate normalization path, as shown on slide 15, with quarterly reductions sustained in the low single-digit area on the path of low NII benefiting from strong disbursements in Q2, which reached a multi-year quarterly high of 2.8 billion. The accelerated trade expansion offsets the mild rate impact due to lower URIBO rates, partially absorbing the full impact of the hedging costs on deposits, as well as higher volume-driven emerald costs. At the same time, lending spread normalization continues at a low pace, with corporate spreads nearly flat year-to-date. Our deposit mix shifted closer to 80% in favor of core deposits in Q2, supporting our funding costs and NIM. Furthermore, time deposit repricing has abated, with yields in euro terms coming in at circa 200 basis points in Q2, implying a better of circa 50%. On a first half basis, NII reached 1.2 billion, with NIM at 323 basis points, well above our previous full year 24 target of less than 290 basis points, prompting us to upgrade guidance to over 300 basis points. Going forward, our upgraded net credit expansion, our increased exposure in fixed rate assets, and the reduction of hedging costs as ECB rates gradually come off are anticipated to offset the impact of lower rates on our NII. Complementing our resilient NII, net fees continued on a double-digit growth path, up 15% year-on-year and 6% quarter-on-quarter, driving fees over assets up nearly 10 basis points year-on-year to 0.6% in H1-24. As shown on slide 20, This was supported by retail fees increasing by 14% year-on-year on double-digit growth across products, with the most notable movements witnessed in investment products up 36% year-on-year, and bank assurance up 27% year-on-year. Retail lending fees are up by 30% year-on-year, benefiting from higher new production volumes, while corporate fees increase by 10% year-on-year, also driven by loan origination. Meanwhile, Transactions to e-banking channels were up 22% year-on-year in Q2, testament to the quality of our digital offering, driving total transactions 10% higher year-on-year. Moving to costs on slide 21, adjusting for the base effect from variable remuneration accounted for in the second half of last year versus evenly in 2024. Expenses were contained in H124, increasing by just 3.6% year-on-year. allowing our cost-to-core income ratio to remain low and well inside our upgraded full-year 24 target of less than 33%. The major increase in costs reflects the collectively agreed wage rises of last December, the impact from inflation, and the bank's strategic investment in IT infrastructure and digitization, which is already enhancing our operational efficiency and significantly improving our commercial offering and customer experience. Now let me walk you through our balance sheet highlights, summarized on slide 11. Loan disbursements, mostly driven by corporate, accelerated to 2.8 billion in Q2, driving group performing loans up by 2.4 billion year-on-year and 0.9 billion year-to-date to 31.4 billion, with retail also maintaining the positive Q1 momentum. Disbursements were spread across all segments, indicative of our diversified approach and market appetite. A strong pipeline provides confidence for the attainment of our upgraded loan expansion target of circa $1.5 billion for 2024. With regards to liquidity, our net cash position increased by $1.1 billion year-to-date to $9.1 billion, standing at the high end of the sector even post the full repayment of our TLTRO exposure in March, providing ongoing support to our NII and NIF. Deposits in Q2 reversed Q1 seasonality, with balances ending up near the flat year-to-date, increasing by a solid 1.4 billion year-on-year due to court deposit inflows from retail customers. Our loan-to-deposit and liquidity coverage ratios stood at 60% and 240% respectively, ranking at the high end amongst European peers. Finally, our liquidity profile entails a total funding cost of just 77 basis points, supported by deposits which comprise 95% of our total funds. Turning to asset quality on slides 22 to 24, group NP stock declined further to $1.2 billion in Q2, just $0.2 billion net of provisions, with insignificant organic formation leading to a normalizing cost of risk of 55 basis points in H1 versus 68 basis points a year ago. Our NP ratio stood at 3.3%. lower by 40 basis points quarter-on-quarter, with cash coverage at 86% and coverage across all three stages because being at the high end of the European bank's spectrum. Regarding capital, on slide 12, our strong H1 profitability drove our class-leading SED-1 ratio higher by 100 basis points year-to-date, or plus 50 basis points post-dividend accruance at 18.3%, with total capital ratio coming in at 20.9% and our emerald ratio settling at 25.9%, already exceeding the January 25 requirement of 25.3%. Following the 30% dividend payout in 2024, we have increased our dividend accruals in H-124 to reflect a target payout of 40% in 2025 out of 2024 profits. Our balance sheet superiority, as depicted on slide 13, underpinned by our leading liquidity and cabial profile, complemented by sustainable profitability, led Moody's recently to upgrade our rating by two notches to BBB, one notch above investment grade, following the DPRS upgrade to investment grade status in April. On slides 32 to 34, we provide a snapshot of our CSG priorities. We lead the market in sustainable energy financing, accelerating the transition to a sustainable economy, while our ambitious emission targets substantiate our net-zero commitment. We continue to receive broad recognition for our ESG activity and practices, recently achieving further upgrades from ISS and sustainability. A strong outperformance in the first half of 2024, coupled with the extended interest rate normalization horizon, describing an upward revision of our core return on tangible equity guidance for 2024 to over 16% versus 15% previously, with our core profit after tax now expected at circa 1.3 billion versus 1.2 billion before, as shown on slide 39. This translates into a higher EPS of circa 1.4 euros per share from 1.2 euros before. The key driver behind revising upwards our co-profitability guidance is the strength in our core income, which is now seen higher in 2024, despite attaining record high levels in 2023, leveraging NII strength and sustained momentum in fees. With regards to NII, it is now expected to edge marginally higher versus the 2023 record levels, despite lowering base rates, thus driving a 2024 NIM above 300 basis points versus the initial guidance of less than 290 basis points. The NII trajectory is supported by stronger loan growth, fueled by healthy corporate pipeline, allowing us to upgrade our 2024 loan expansion target to circa $1.5 billion versus $1.2 billion previously. Fees so far also outperform our initial expectations. leveraging the sharp pickup in loan origination, as well as the accelerating cross-sell of investment and bank assurance products. This momentum is testament to the success of our strategic direction to enhance the bank's fee-generating capacity via improved product and service offerings and digital channel leverage. We maintain our guidance for the high single-digit increase for this year with upside risk potential. Core income growth and continued cost discipline should allow our cost-to-core income ratio to remain below the 33% mark in 2024. Furthermore, we now anticipate our cost of risk to remain below 60 basis points, providing further cushion to our profitability and returns targets. Favorable asset quality trends year-to-date allow a revised 2024 NP ratio target of circa 3% versus 3.5% initially. Looking into the medium term, our 2026 core profit after tax target is revised higher to over 1.3 billion from over 1.2 billion initially, implying an EPS above 1.4 euros per share. Our NIM expectation is now in excess of 270 basis points compared to less than 270 basis points previously, mostly due to more favorable benchmark rates. Adjusting for excess capital defined over our internal Z1 target of 14%, normalized core internal tangible equity for 2026 is expected to exceed 18%. At this profitability rate, capital generation will continue strong, exceeding 500 basis points until 2026, driving our Z1 ratio pre-dividends to over 23%, as shown on slide 42. This level of capital against the 14% Z1 internal target level enticed more than 900 basis points of excess, providing, amongst other things, strategic flexibility as regards shareholders' remuneration. NBG delivered a solid financial performance in H1 that exceeded expectations, triggering guidance upgrades across key performance indicators. Our financial results are testament to the hard work and commitment of our team, as well as of the change momentum of the bank. As we move forward, we are confident in our ability to continue generating value for our shareholders, efficiently utilizing our class-leading levels of capital. And with that, let's now open the floor to questions.
The first question comes from the line of Butkov Michael with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Good day. Thank you very much for the presentation. I have two questions. One is on your performing loans growth, which was quite strong and there was quite strong acceleration in the second quarter of the year how do you see the pipeline so far for the second half given that last year for example the second half was stronger than the first half and do you see the chances of that repeating this year as well and another question is on your capital allocation maybe any updates with regards to these given the upgraded guidance on several metrics plus any views on the potential buybacks and appetite for that thank you okay let me start and Christos can add on the on the long growth
you will have noted that it's choppy it is a corporate loan book that is the key driver of loan expansion and it gets choppy and sometimes you have large disbursements especially at the end of quarter so that's why we've upgraded the guidance significantly but let's see with the pipeline whether some of this pipeline that I mentioned falls on this side or not of the calendar year so you need to smooth out a little bit the flows and therefore let's see how we go we may we will give more guidance at the end of the year but I think that the upgrade has been quite large so far Now on the capital allocation, nothing really much has changed. We were on track as before. You mentioned buybacks. Buybacks have to be approved by the regulator. I think that we got a very solid nod with the distribution, the dividend distribution of 30%. we mentioned that we are now accruing for 40% the buyback we'll need to discuss with the regulator down the road I think if the question is with respect to if there's any placement and there's a buyback I think on that one it is less likely but let's see and with that maybe Christos wants to add
Thank you, Pablo. I will add something to the capital question. So first of all, the first, let's say, change that has occurred is us upgrading our target payout for next year. As you may have seen, we started accruing for the 40% payout for 2025 out of this year's profit. But also, the guidance to 2026 implies a buffer over our internal CED1 target of 14%. that's about 900 basis points we want to optimize on that excess capital partially growing our balance sheet but also we want to set aside about half of it to return capital to the shareholders so that's more or less the plan we want to support the economy in Greece to grow and explore any other opportunities where we can deploy capital we've discussed about the let's say the NP ecosystem, the performing loans that will come in play maybe two or three years down the road, we need to be ready for that as well with the use of our capital. So that's more or less it.
Great. Thank you very much for the questions. Much appreciated.
The next question comes from the land of Ismailo Eleni with Axia Ventures. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and congratulations for this very strong set of results from my side, and thanks for taking my questions. So the first one would be on NII. If you could help us understand the dynamics that will drive profitability in the second half of the year, meaning how you expect the loan spread to unfold and the deposit better coupled with a mix. And in NII, on the outlook, if you could elaborate on any changes in your hedge strategy that we should have in mind for the second half, What is the current size of the position and how, for example, has it changed if it has changed at all quarter on quarter vis-a-vis the changes in interest rates? And the third question would be a follow-up on capital because as profitability is one of the drivers behind the accelerated DTC reduction, should we expect any changes in the outlook there in the coming period or in any other of the moving parts that we should be accounting for going forward? Thank you.
Thank you for the question. So I'll start with NII and the dynamics in the second half. So there are several drivers for the expected overperformance year-on-year and the better second half than we originally expected. First of all, the key driver is pace rate. It seems that pace rates are coming with a slower pace than we expected initially. so that would serve as a nice tailwind with regard to sustaining high levels of NII. The second point that I would like to make is deposits, both in terms of mix as well as in terms of betters. At deposit mix, while we originally expected something in the area of 75 core 25 time, now it seems that it's unfolding better. As you may have seen, we're at about 79% core deposit in H2, so that is supporting our NII for the last two quarters of the year as well. And also, deposit betas seem to have stabilized at 50%. We haven't seen pressure on increasing time deposit costs by much, so that's another positive development with regards to initial expectations. Obviously, you have to add to the equation the stronger credit expansion we have experienced early enough in the year, so this will support an IEI growth for the second half of the year as well. And also, we seem to have optimized a bit on MREL costs in terms of pricing during the first three issuances that we have in the year, which also supports an IEI. And lastly, which I will link at this point to your next question, is the benefit of hedging costs and deposits. As rates come off, the burden of the negative carry will also be a bit more light than what we experience at the moment. Now, moving on to the second part of your question with regards to our hedging strategy. It is a dynamic world. We need to be proactive and always check the maturity of our balance sheet. Currently, our strategy is not differentiating Q2 from Q1. We have about 10 billion of hedges on demand deposits with an average maturity of about five years. the burden that we experienced per month in the first few months of the year was in the area of 6 to 7 million per month and we expect that cost to go down as the rates also go down in the future and with regards to your last question on capital I think what you are saying is that we do expect the generation of capital on the part of the increased profitability to be above 500 basis points so there is a room for and the uses of capital is as I've described them in the question from Michael before.
Excellent. Thank you, Christos, very much for your clear answers. And again, congratulations for the results.
The next question comes from the line of Iqbal Neda with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much for the presentation. My first question is a follow-up on the capital again. I just want to understand better, given the amount of excess capital you have, could dividends pay out as we look out to 2026, the price to the upside? Just trying to understand if there may be any hurdles to pay out above 50%. from a regulatory perspective. Are DTCs a concern? So that's the first question on capital. Secondly, buybacks. Just wanted to clarify, is there a potential for buybacks in addition to dividends or would it be a situation of, you know, for example, 50% payout being split between dividends and buybacks? And then thirdly, on the capital again and the asset growth potential, Would you be looking at inorganic opportunities at all? Thank you very much.
Okay. I'll take the questions. The strategy is to gradually increase remuneration to shareholders to European levels. Currently that's around 70%, with about two-thirds being dividends and one-third being buybacks. That's our goal, to be a normal European bank and reach these levels. Now, how quickly we can do so, we're going to do it gradually. It's not going to be tomorrow. It's going to be gradually over time. So that's the strategy for the remuneration. There are no hurdles, as we know. You saw the approval of the regulator. It is so far clear sailing. inorganic we always look for inorganic and it has to be something that's accretive it has to be something that creates value for shareholders there have to be synergies so we are looking but they have to meet these these criteria I hope that helps thank you very much very clear
The next question comes from the line of Kemeny Gabor with Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.
Hi. A few follow-up questions from me, please. First one is, again, on NII, can you give us your sensitivity to lower Euribor rates, please? I understand this has been mitigated by the hedges. The other question I had, you talked about the support, the NII support from a better-than-expected deposit mix. Could you clarify what beta, what deposit beta do you assume for this year? I'm asking because I saw your beta has been stable in Q2 at only 12%. And the other one would be on capital and the dividend. I understand you are saying there are no hurdles to doing dividends and buybacks, but still, I mean, given your excess capital position, what's would prevent you to get to that 70% level relatively sooner. I guess one question I have is if there is any discussion about doing more on the DTC reduction, DTC amortization than the linear schedule which is in place now. Thank you.
Thank you, Gabor. Let me start with NIA sensitivity. assuming a static balance sheet following all the actions that we've taken so far, our sensitivity with a rate reduction in the area of 25 basis points would be on an annualized basis in the area of 50 to 35 million euros. So that's the current sensitivity of the balance sheet. Now with regards to the deposit betas that you asked, what we had originally budgeted for in the business plan was for the time deposit data to go north of 50%. Currently, we've seen that not move up with the speed we expected. It's doing better. So our expectation now is that deposit betas will remain in the area of 50% for the rest of the year, especially with the benchmark rates going down, there will be less pressure with regards to time deposits. And as you may have also heard from our CEO, we do have a strategy of... shifting, diverting time depositors to asset management products, which is also something we offer to our clients. Now, with regards to capital and dividend and the question that you asked with regards to TTC, so firstly, let me clarify that TTC is something that is improving dramatically compared to where we have been a couple of years ago. With regards to MBG, TTC has a share of said one is now at 51.5%, if I'm not mistaken. and the path going forward is for that to decrease to below 35% by the end of the business fund horizon, that's by 2026. We have also described in the past that in our planning period, DTC will take about 17 years to fully amortize based on the current legislation that is in place. I do agree that our excess capital provides us with strategic flexibility if we would opt a way to amortize that TTC sooner. But as the CEO said, you know, you've seen us unlock dividends after 16 years with a payout of 30%, pretty healthy to start with, and our intention is to increase payouts gradually. It's not only about, you know, paying out money. It's about also optimizing strategy with regards to growing our balance sheet So that's the mix effectively that will influence our path towards increasing the payouts in the future. But we're pretty comfortable with the excess and the strategic flexibility that this excess is giving.
That's very helpful. At what stage would you expect a discussion about the strategic options on capital? Would it be Q4?
It's ongoing. So depending on opportunities and how things unfold,
are if you have anything new to say we'll be guiding you every time we have a point of reference that is out all right thank you the next question comes from the line of cantarovich alexander with ramer capital please go ahead I yes thank you gentlemen I have a brief question on your headcount I noted that in your presentation it's unchanged from previous year and could you please share with us how this will evolve in 2024 and 2025 headcount branches perhaps and how this would affect trading costs thank you
Headcount, we have achieved approximately a 40% reduction in net headcount over the past three or four years. We are getting near to the level we wish. We still have a little bit more to go. I think more important on headcount is... retraining and rejuvenation and maybe hires in critical areas like the digital banking and the IT so we will need to either do some retraining or some BS with which to do some innovation generation of the headcount. So I think you will not see the very large reduction in staff costs that you've seen over the past few years, but they will remain broadly flourish with the key driver being more the wages with the next year being the new collective three-year collective agreement. and the job market here in Greece despite being being better than Northern Europe is starting to heat up so that would be more of a concern than the headcount thank you yes thank you very much and my line was kind of bad could you please repeat what you said about sensitivity of your
deposit rates to the policy rate?
Yes, what I said, let me repeat that, with regards to time deposit betas, is that our expectation for the rest of the year is that it will remain in the area of 50%, despite that originally we expected that number to be a bit higher, north of 50%. I also mentioned that the deposit mix is favorable compared to original expectations, and it seems to have been stabilized at 79-80%. Originally, we expected it a bit lower to 75%. And the other reference I made to NII sensitivity is that for every 25 basis points of a decrease in the benchmark rates, our NII sensitivity is about 30 to 35 million euros on an annualized basis.
Yes, thank you very much. That's all I have. Cheers.
The next question comes from the land of with J.B. Morgan. Please go ahead.
Good morning. Thanks very much for taking my question. I had just two follow-ups remaining, and one on your NII guidance. Clearly, the momentum is better than initially expected in NII, and I think your comments also on the second half sound quite encouraging, especially with the better volumes and stable margins and the hedges also in the book. So when you say marginal growth that you expect in the full year versus last year, would you be able to quantify what that level would be, given obviously at a low single-digit level that would still imply quite a visible decrease in the second half? And just one technical one that will be on the guidance again, core, PAT and EPS, the disconnect there, I just wanted to understand why the EPS is growing faster than than the nominal profit figure. Thank you.
Thanks for the question, Sevim. So on NII guidance, marginal NII growth versus last year implies something in the millions, not by much. You want to take a number in the area of 20 to 30 million. But things are unfolding in the year. We have to wait and see exactly how this number will be. But still pretty happy compared to where we were a few quarters ago when we expected NII to be in the low single digits, decreased down compared to last year. So we're very happy with this development. Now with regards to the second question, I think it's a matter of roundings. There's nothing there. If we open up the decimals, you will see that it's correlated directly with COPPA.
Thanks very much.
The next question comes from the island of Boulogouris, Alexandros, with Euroc Securities. Please go ahead.
Hello, good morning on my end as well. A quick follow-up as well on my side regarding corporate spreads, which we've seen a very mild pressure of flattening trends. Do you think this will sustain going forward, and what is your assumption on the 2026 guide answer? And also on the 2026 guidance regarding the time deposit mix, do you assume the current trends of very low 20-something percent time deposit to total to sustain at this level or increase? Thank you.
Hi, Alex. Thanks for the question. So on the corporate spreads, we're very happy to see this performance at the first six months of the year. Just two basis points of the year end point of reference despite you know as we acknowledge the competition we experience in the Greek market for new loans now what we've been saying still sustains we do not expect at least in the next let's say 12 months to experience an increase in the compression in the spreads of over 20 basis points so that's where we still are today obviously we'll monitor developments and to the extent of any changes we'll update the the market. And with regards to the deposit mix, well, it's a bit early to talk about 26. The same goes for spread in 2026. So currently with the mix, we believe that it will maintain the levels that we see today, especially given that the rates are going down. So pressure will be less for a shift in deposits from core to time. But I think we should wait until, you know, thank you ladies and gentlemen there are no further questions at this time I will now turn the conference over to Mr. Milonas for any closing comments thank you
Thank you all for joining us despite the date of the 1st of August I wish you all happy holidays relaxing holidays and I'm sure we'll be in close touch in September so thank you all very much
