Subsea 7 S.A.

Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to sub C7 Q2 2025 results conference call and webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, please press star one and one on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. Please note that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker, Catherine Tongs. Please go ahead.

Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining us. The results press release is available to download on our website, along with the slides that we'll use during today's call. Please note that some of the information discussed on the call today will include forward-looking statements that reflect our current views. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or trends to differ materially from our forecast. For more information, please refer to the risk factors discussed in Subsea 7's annual report or today's quarterly press release. The question and answer session today may include discussion of our proposed merger with CYPEM. Security laws in the U.S. restrict the broadcast and dissemination of such content into the U.S. Please refer to the disclaimer that will be displayed during the Q&A sessions. I'll now turn the call over to John Evans, CEO.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. With me today are Mark Foley, our CFO, Natalie Lewis, General Counsel, and Stuart Fitzgerald, CEO of Seaway. This is the first time we've had the opportunity to speak with the market following entering into the definitive merger agreement with Sypen. I expect there'll be questions on the transactions I have invited Natalie Lewis, our General Counsel, to today's call. Natalie, Mark, and I have been involved since the very start of the negotiations with SIPM and will assist me in answering any questions you have. I will start with a summary of the quarter before passing on to Mark for more details of the financial results. Turn it to slide three. Subsea Sem delivered second quarter adjusted EBITDA of $360 million, representing 23% growth year on year and a margin of over 20%. We recorded strong margin expansion in both sub-scene conventional and renewables, and this, as well as high visibility on the remainder of the year, supports the reiteration of our guidance for 2025. Order intake was high in the quarter at $2.5 billion, resulting in a book to bill of 1.4 times for the quarter and one times for the half year. Slide four shows the backlogs of both sub-seam conventional and renewables, which continue to increase in quality as older vintage contracts are replaced with new. We have a combined backlog for execution in the remainder of 2025 of $3.6 billion, giving us over 90% visibility on our four-year revenue. And now I'll pass over to Mark to run through the financial results. Thank you, John, and good morning everyone.

I'll start with a look at group and business unit performance in the second quarter before turning to the cash flow and financial guidance for 2025. Slide five summarizes the group's results. In the second quarter, revenue was $1.8 billion, up 1% compared to the same quarter last year, driven by sustained high activity levels. Adjusted EBITDA of $360 million was up 23% compared to the prior year, and the margin expanded by 370 basis points to over 20%. After depreciation and amortization of $175 million, other gains and losses of $32 million, driven by non-cash foreign exchange gains and embedded derivatives, Net finance costs of $16 million and taxation of $71 million. Net income was $131 million. I'll discuss the business unit performance in the next few slides. Slide six presents the key metrics for subsidy and convention. Revenue in the second quarter was $117 million. Turkey, and Norway. Adjusted EBITDA was $301 million, equating to a margin of 21%, an increase of 400 basis points from the prior year. The quarter benefited from strong execution performance and high vessel utilization, as well as the continued next shift towards projects with an improved balance of risk and reward. The results of subsea and conventional include a $9 million net income contribution from one subsea, in line with our expectations. Net operating income was $165 million, a 30% increase compared to the prior year period. Selected renewables performance metrics are shown in slide seven. Revenue in the second quarter was $307 million, up 9% year-on-year, reflecting high levels of activity at Doggerbank Sea and East Anglia III. Adjusted EBITDA was $53 million, equating to a margin of 17%, up from 14% in Q2 2024. Net operating income was $20 million, a significant improvement from the $8 million reported in the same quarter last year. Slide eight shows the cash bridge for the second quarter. Net cash generated from operating activities was $339 million, which included a $59 million improvement in working capital. Capital expenditure was $93 million, including final payment for monopile installation equipment for Seaway Ventures. Net cash used in financing activities was $306 million, which included lease payments of $77 million and a payment of $184 million in respect of the first tranche of our 2025 dividend, which was paid in May. At the end of the quarter, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $46 million to $413 million. Net debt was $695 million, including lease liabilities of $448 million, equating to a net debt to last 12 months adjusted EBITDA of 0.6 times. The group had liquidity of $1.2 billion at quarter end, which included approximately $760 million of committed and utilised borrowing facilities. To conclude the financials, we come to slide 9. We continue to expect revenue of between $6.8 and $7.2 billion, in the full year 2025. The strong results in the first half of the year, combined with high visibility and confidence in our execution performance, we reiterate our guidance for adjusted EBITDA margin between 18 and 20%. Guidance on other income statement variables, as well as capital expenditure, remains unchanged. I will now pass you back to John.

Thank you, Mark. On the next two slides, we take a look at our activities in Norway. Slide 10 shows a sample of the projects we have underway during 2025. SUBSI 7 has been involved with Norman Langer since the original development in the early 2000s. For Phase 3, together with 1SUBSI, we delivered front-end engineering and an integrated EPCI that includes SUBSI flowline system, as well as two multi-phase compression systems. The third phase aims to recover an additional 30 to 50 billion cubic meters of gas for export to European markets. And as an illustration of the SIA's capability in unlocking reserves and maximizing the value of existing infrastructure through brand field developments. Now, Infrasil is a flagship development in Norway, targeting 450 million barrels of recoverable oil, which will create a new hub in the region. Our scope is on track and we will be utilizing the 7 Vega, 7 Ocean and 7 Naviga to install a range of pipelines alongside two large bundles. Finally, we have the Northern Lights project. Engineering is underway for phase two with offshore activities scheduled for the next year. The project aims to increase the CO2 storage capacity from 1.5 to at least 5 million tons per year marking a major step up in this large-scale, cross-border project that will play a crucial role in decarbonising hard-to-abate industries in Europe. Our second slide on Norway shows a sample of the new awards that will sustain Subsea 7's activities, including a number of important brownfield projects. East 3 will tie back to the new Idrisil hub, unlocking oil located beneath gas structures that were produced in the 1990s. As with Idrisil, the project will use our cost efficient proprietary pipeline bundle design, which we fabricated at our base in Wyck in Scotland. We expect to be offshore in three campaigns in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Now, Francois involves the development of four fields that will be tied back to the existing Trollseed platform. again unlocking reserves and extending the life of existing infrastructure. Subsea 7 was involved with a feed study in close collaboration with the clients to bring the project to FID. The resulting EPCI award covers subsea umbilicals, flowlines, and risers that are due for installation in 26, 27, and 28. Finally, we have ConocoPhillips' Previously Produced Fields, or PPF, Subsea 7 is involved in the feed work to revitalize existing infrastructure, this time at Equifist. These fields were amongst the earliest producing oil fields in Norway, but were shut in with significant gaps still in place. New seismic and drilling technologies have enabled the reappraisal and redevelopment, which, if sanctioned, will use the 7 borealis. With significant reserves close to existing facilities, Norway stands to deliver incremental production with low carbon intensity and compelling project economics. Subsea 7 is well placed in this market with highly collaborative client relationships that leverage our early engagement expertise and innovative development solutions. I now want to review our prospects on slide 12 and 13. In Subsea, tendering activities remain high across our key regions. In Brazil, the number of prospects has increased with the addition of Merrill Way 2 and Buzios Way 2, which are both designed to maximize production of existing FPSOs. We're also pleased to recently be awarded an integrated feed study for Baccalaureate 2, extending our relationship with Equinor in the region. Overall, we expect a steady flow of awards to the industry this year and next from Brazil. Elsewhere, bidding for Saka Rear 3 in Turkey is advancing well, and we expect the contract to be awarded to the industry in the coming months. In the Middle East, we continue to bid on a selective basis for scopes that match our asset capabilities, whilst in Africa, there are several major projects on the 10 ring horizon. In Norway, North America, and Australia, we have a number of smaller prospects that bring balance and diversification to our bidding pipeline. Our focus on long cycle projects in cost advantage regions for the oil sector, as well as on strategic gas developments as resilience for our subsea strategy and gives us confidence in the output. On the next slide, we've replaced our usual wind map with an overview of the projects that may participate in the UK's allocation REN step. There were some delays to AR7 as the government debated the zonal pricing and pre-consented projects, as well as consulting with the industry on reforms to the contract for difference scheme. It is now moving forward after recent announcements that non-consented projects can participate and that the CFD duration will extend from 15 to 20 years. A maximum strike price of £113 per megawatt hour in the money of 2024 has also been announced. Linking us back to previous rounds of money in 2012, AR7 raised to £81, whilst the maximum strike price for AR6 is £73 and AR5 is £44. The auction process is due to commence in August, with the results expected to be confirmed early next year. As the largest single market in the global offshore wind sector outside China, and with a number of other markets showing slower than anticipated growth, the time and outcome of the UK process will be key to deliver for medium-term momentum in the industry. Subsea 7, through Seaway 7, is tendering multiple scopes and working closely with a number of our key clients to optimize the AR7 developments whilst remaining selective in the contracts we pursue to safeguard our future profitability. To conclude, we turn to our final slide on page 14. Sub-CSEM finished the second quarter of 2025 with a backlog of firm orders valued at nearly $12 billion. This gives us over 90% visibility on revenue in the full year 2025 and supports our reiteration of our full year guidance, implying EBITDA growth of over 20%. Looking further ahead, We have high conviction in the fundamental drivers for long-term growth of the energy industry as a whole. And we're confident that SoC7 is well placed in sectors with favorable dynamics. On the 23rd of July, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement to merge with Saipan. We will be engaging with shareholders in the coming months. I look forward to discussing the benefits of this transaction with you ahead of an EGM on the 25th of September. And with that, we'll be happy to take your questions.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 1 and 1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1 and 1 again. Once again, please press star 1 and 1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1 and 1 again. We are now going to proceed with our first question. And the first questions come from the line of Sebastian Erskine from Rothschild & Co. Redburn. Please ask your question.

Yeah. Hi. Good morning, John, Mark and team. Bloody congrats on the announcement of the definitive merger agreement with CYPEM and the performance today. Most importantly, you can now enjoy your summer. I guess I'll start on the merger if I can. We've seen the addition of roughly 105 million euro extraordinary dividend connected with a permitted divestment. Can you shed any light on this? And is that related to your fleet? And then kind of secondly, there had been some concern in the market around the potential liabilities associated with Sitem's legacy backlog. How were you able to get comfortable during your due diligence? The provisioning on some of the legacy projects was sufficient. Thanks.

Yeah, thanks, Sebastian. Let's take the second question first. So we went into a confirmatory DV process at the end of February. And we had a good look at all the projects in the SciPen portfolio. The offshore construction division, which we're very familiar with, has good performance and we're very comfortable with everything that's in that portfolio. We had a good look at CoreCell through Stuart's team in COSM. We have good understanding of CoreCell and their plans to complete that project. The one area that we did spend quite some time on is Thai oil, which has been one of the topics that's been in focus publicly. And we benefited from meetings with site and senior management with a project team. We also brought in some independent consultants to work our way through that project. We were also then benefiting from a range of reasonable outcomes that they showed us dependent on different scenarios. and we also understood the provision that's already taken place. Long story short, when we completed the due diligence, we firmly believe that this is a very good transaction for subsea savings shareholders. The combination of the pre-closed dividend and the future growth that the combined business will have, we certainly do believe that this is a very good transaction for us to move on. I'll ask Mark to talk about 105

Yes, sure. Sebastian, as you would expect, both Saipan and ourselves are constantly re-evaluating our portfolio. And when we enter into the AOU, we're expecting potential transactions on either side. They're denoted as permissible transactions. One is moving ahead on our side, and we haven't entered into an SPA yet. And as such, I think it would be remiss of me to provide any more details. However, we will have noted in our financial statements that we have created disposal groups for the assets that we expect to be disposed. And as a result, in the MOU and the merger agreement, the disposal of this part of the portfolio will lead to a €150 billion dividend to sub C7 shareholders, and that will be the early of the close

Appreciate it. Thanks very much. If I could just squeeze in one follow-up on your order outlook. I was intrigued to know that you seem to be involved in quite a lot of Middle Eastern tenders. I think you mentioned that, John. It's a region that's historically not been a key focus, given it's kind of not surf pure play. But obviously, there are kind of CRPO's you've been named in for Aramco, and then also Bulhanin in Qatar. How big a factor is that region going to have in your order intake in the second half?

We have a business in the Middle East that's scaled correctly for Subsea 7. It uses a certain group of acids which aren't generally the ultra deep water acid that we use elsewhere. And we are looking in the second half of this year to replenish some of the backlog that we burned off in the last year. So again, we are very selective about which CRPOs and which packages we bid. As you know, we have a good relationship with Larsen & Toubro to bring our combined strengths together on some of the larger projects. So, for us, it's about maintaining a reasonable level of work for our Middle East group, which is complementary to our subsea and ultra deep water recurve group.

Many thanks, Sir.

John and Mark, I'll hand it back now. Thank you.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Victoria McCulloch from RBC. Please ask your question.

Hi, morning all. Thanks very much for your time today. Maybe starting with the deal first, one of the benefits you highlighted in the initial presentation when the deal was announced was the geographic focus of the key enabler vessels. Can you give us, just to try and understand the potential magnitude and the impact this could have, how much additional availability do you think key enablers might be able to achieve by keeping them in key geographies from the combination? And then secondly, looking at the financials, pardon me, for the second half of the year, are your expectations in terms of margins that we see the usual seasonality through Q3 and Q4? And just if I can do a slight follow-up to the previous questions, should we interpret that the £105 million reflects a premium to book value received with the reflection of it not having been in the deal terms prior, previously agreed? Thanks very much.

The discussion on the enabling assets is just around the fact that the very large assets that both ourselves and Syphon have are global neighbours and have to serve a global portfolio. Today, as standalone businesses, we move these assets around quite significantly, and they probably do between 60 and 90 days a year So that's one way of thinking about it, not a very scientific way of looking at it, but just to help you understand the opportunity set and just roughly the scaling of some of that. On the £105 million in the second half financials, I'll pass over to Mark.

Hi, Victoria. Yes, we expect to experience normal seasonality in terms of margins this year. We have low margins in Q1, Northern Hemisphere's winter list activity, and the North Sea in particular, and Norway, as well as the renewables business. And again, we get some of that in Q4 too. So what we do see is, or we do expect, is peak margins for the year in Q2 and Q3. In terms of your question on the €105 million dividend, yes, we believe there will be a premium to boot value.

Thanks very much for the call. I really appreciate it.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the next questions come from the line of Mick Pickups from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everybody. Quick question, if I may, on Brazil. several new projects turned up there can you just talk about brazil's contracting there was talk about them trying to get another vessel in it's clearly an area where the combined company could make use of this positioning of global enablers so what type of flexibility in those contracts is available for using the vessel and it's an area where I would have thought you could get some early submissions into the competition authorities. I'm wondering if any of that has been done.

Thanks, Mick. Good question. I'll let you come back from Brazil. I was in Brazil earlier this week. Petrobras, as you have seen in our map, continue to put newer projects into the portfolio. There is what they call Mero Phase 2 and Buzios Phase 2. And what those projects are around is the fact that there are empty slots on the riser porches on each FPSO. So when we put a green field in, we put the initial field development in, and there are additional slots to allow other risers to come in. So there'll be a package of work covering multiple FPSOs in the Mero field. they'll do the same with Bugios. So Petrobras are looking, again, not just only at pure greenfields, but maximizing out their existing production in each of the fields that have been developed over the last five years. So the clarity Petrobras is thinking is there. They are interested in inquiring to the markets about the availability of a large rigid pipe layer to work in a similar mode as a PLSV, the flex layers. And again, that will be something that they will come to the market, I expect, in the next year. And lastly, I think Petrobras are also interested in making sure there's stiff competition in Brazil. We've seen in the last three big submissions a lot of very, very tight competition in our world. Sometimes we lose the packages. So we expect to win our fair share of work in Brazil. And maybe I'll pass over to Natalie just to talk about the antitrust process and just how Brazil fits into that.

We believe that this is a merger of two highly complementary businesses with limited overland. We have been working diligently to prepare for filing with the relevant authorities and this has reaffirmed our confidence that the deal will be approved. We've already initiated pre-filing processes in certain jurisdictions and I think that we remain with our current best estimate for closing the second half of 2026. But in the meantime, We will manage our respective business as business as usual until the proposed transaction closes.

And I think just to add to that point, it is Brazil that we believe drives our critical path. So probably the question you could ask us next, what is the critical path to get to the second half? It will probably be Brazil.

Yes, indeed. Okay, perfect. Can I just ask a follow-up question on SACRIA Phase 3? You mentioned Empty risers, the riser joints for Sakeria Phase 3 were awarded a week or so ago. So where do we stand on that project going forward?

As I said in my prepared remarks, we expect that to be awarded to the industry sometime either late Q3 or early Q4. So, yes, the long leads are being ordered by our clients to make sure that the project schedules are maintained whilst they're going through their main procurement process of FPSO, SDS, and SURF and TRONTRON.

Perfect, John. Thank you very much.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Kevin Roger from Kepler Chivalry. Please ask your question.

Yes, good afternoon. Thanks for the time. I will have two if I may. The first one, if you can help me to understand a bit more the guidance that you confirmed today, because in the Merge and Plan documents, we can find that basically for the payment of the dividend, you have an EBITDA target of $1.4 billion. So on the mid-range of your top-line guidance, that makes a kind of 20% EBITDA margin. So Just trying to understand a bit more the guidance that you confirmed today with the 18-20% margin range compared to what we have in the merger documents, please. And the second one is maybe on the offshore wind. So you provided a lot of details on the UK environment. Just to be sure, those orders, do you believe that it will fall in 2025 or in 2026 for you, please?

Thanks. We'll ask Mark to take the guidance and merger question, and then Stuart will come in to answer your wind question.

Thanks, Kevin. In the merger document, this is a customary inclusion to regulate dividends for both parties. The $1.4 billion sits within the range that we reach in filming today. That was revenue between 6.8 and 7.2 billion dollars. adjust the dividend margin between 18 and 20 percent so at the upper end of the range the 1.46 within the guidance that we shared with and reiterated to the market today um but again it's important to underscore that the mechanism in the merger agreement is for a different purpose and that's to regulate dividends from both parties

And I'll take the second one, Kevin, on timing of UK AR7 CFD. It's at the turn of the year, so the timelines given by the authorities is awards of CFD at the very end of 2025, but in case of appeals, that then moves into January, February of 2026. So it'll be at the turn of the year. Our working assumption is early 2026 rather than 2025.

Okay, perfect.

Thanks.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Richard Dawson from Barenburg. Please ask your question.

Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. Just to follow up on the margin question for H2, given you've already done 18% or over 18% in the first half, and given the seasonality you tend to see, what's the risk of maybe landing towards the lower half of the margin guidance for the full year? And then secondly, on the merger, it's been several months now since the merger was announced in February. So just wanted to get a sense of whether there's been any change in feedback from your key customers and what their comments are now. Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Richard. On the merger, we've engaged with all our clients and we've engaged with most of our shareholders as well in the last few months. And generally, the discussions are positive. Our clients understand what we are trying to achieve, but they fully understand that it has to go through a regulatory process where there's due process between the antitrust in each of the countries that we're in. So for us, we now need to work our way through, as Natalie discussed earlier, that will take us to the middle half of next year. But direction of travel and discussions with clients are positive. The main feedback from all our clients is both Saipem and Subsea 7 have record backlogs in the Subsea business and they want to make sure that

No, indeed so. Richard, we delivered 18% EBITDA margin in the first half of the year. The guidance for the full year is between 18% and 20%. And of course, if we get any good news to share with the market, then we will share that with you in Q3 in terms of any agreed ratings upwards. But as it stands today, the guidance remains 18% to 20%.

All right, fair enough. Thank you very much.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Guillaume Delavie from Bernstein. Please ask your question.

Yes. Good afternoon, John. Good afternoon, Mark and Catherine. Maybe a very naive and candid question, if I may. So the DMA has been published, I would say, just a few weeks after the initial date. So maybe can you provide us maybe one or reason why things have been taken slightly more? And my naive and candid question is, during all the discussion you had with CYPEM, How would you qualitatively describe those conversations? Were they lively, professional, tough, friendly? Could you maybe provide a little bit of qualitative feeling about that? Thank you.

Well, the timing of the merger agreement definitive, we had targeted around mid-July in the middle of the year, so I think we were within a few days of where we targeted. So I don't think there was any delays in getting there. It's quite a task to get the whole paperwork together, but there was nothing that impeded us from getting there. The discussion started, as we've shared with everybody, late October. from a position of great respect of two companies that sometimes work with each other in the wind sector, sometimes work with each other in joint ventures in the offshore construction business, but are also two very good global contractors that have some complementary strengths and complementary capabilities. So the discussions have always been respectful and with a view that says that there is a logic and there's a merit to conversion towards 50-50. And we've always known that the Saipan offshore construction business has always been a very, very strong business. And they've also understood that Saipan is a very, very strong business as well. So the discussions have always been where we needed it to be. And we are where we are today. And we'll push ahead. And the next step was signing the merger agreement that was done last week. Natalie's team will work diligently with a number of different geographies around the globe on the antitrust that we need to do. And we will start preparing integration planning in September with two teams from both Saipem and Suchise, pretty well motivated and looking forward to that task. So very professional and looking forward to the opportunity should we be able to pass through the various authorities and new processes we need to do. Okay.

I turn it over. Thank you very much, John.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the next questions come from the line of Eric Aspenfusser from SB1 Markets. Please ask your question.

Hello, guys. I have a question for you first, John. There's so many oil service sectors now struggling, rig, seismic supply, oil service majors. have declining margins of revenue. Even the services support vessels are seeing less activity. So there seems to be some more cautious spending or projects being delayed by the companies. So I'm wondering, are you seeing anything of that? Or why are you seemingly untouched by this weakness? Is it just because you're late cycle or is there something more to it?

Thanks, Eric. You know, we certainly are late cycle and we need to remember that we're late cycle. So for us, we have multiple years of good quality earnings ahead of us here and good quality projects to deliver to our clients. As we try to show with the map of opportunities, there's actually more opportunities on the the earlier questions about Brazil. So there are two additional major CERT projects added on in Brazil. So for us, we can only talk about the market that we're in and the market that we serve. Some of the challenges other people have discussed are about onshore US services, about Mexico, and about Saudi. As we discussed earlier, we have a relatively small business in Saudi. We have some projects in Mexico, but ultra deep water projects, which again are quite specialist. And we have no onshore world exposure. We can only talk about the markets we're in. Stuart has talked about the wind sector, which, as we discussed, has its challenges in certain geographies. But equally, the market that we lead in, the UK, looks like it's getting the stars to align to have an opportunity set that comes towards the end of this year. Now, again, we'll see how all that plays out. So that's the reason why we know our level. of optimism and our view about prospects for Succeed in the future. So I can't really give you why others are struggling in their particular area or concerned. We're in a place where we still need to assess.

I appreciate that caller, John. And just one more question to you, Mark, on the lease costs. It came up quite a bit this quarter. I guess that's related to to the chart of ScandiaSFG. What should we expect going forward? Is that Q2 level something that we can speculate on or is it going to increase or come down a little bit?

No, you're right. There was a step up between Q1 and Q2, Erik. I think we have signaled way in advance joining the fleet. Just to set the context, we have 11 lease vessels within the fleet at the moment, nine servicing subsea and conventional, and two servicing renewables. But to specifically answer your question, use Q2 as a proxy for what to expect on lease cash payments in Q3 and Q4.

Thank you very much, guys.

We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the next questions come from the line of Mark Wilson from Jefferies. Please ask your question.

Thank you. Yeah, good morning. First point is on the offshore wind slide. Just remind us how we should understand looking at that. You show a list of projects that may well be entered into the AR7 round. Could you tell us which one of those you're involved with, or would the tenders for such work come after a client moves forward that's the first point and second regarding the the AGM vote that you got coming up in September could just remind us what the the approval levels you're looking for on that to move forward and also last point if there is any break free on or break clause on this definitive merger agreement those are my points thank you very much

Okay, just on the wind slide then, I'll pass over to Stuart to give an update on that and then Natalie can cover the EGN vote and Mark will cover the break.

Yep, I can take the first one there, Mark. So this list is the list of projects that we see qualifying for AR7 under the rules that have been set. It is also the list where we see in our interactions with the clients that they're actively not committed yet to submit but they're actively considering and preparing for submissions. The tendering work and the engagement that we have with these clients is ongoing now as obviously they need to set their cost levels as part of their business cases to prepare their submissions. So, actively engaged with probably the majority of projects on that list, and that engagement happening now.

So, maybe onto the EGM question, I think.

Just on the EGM question, the merger will be submitted for approval by the shareholders of respectively SIPAMs of C7 on the, at the EGM on the 25th of September. For sub-C7, the approval requires a quorum of at least half of the issue share capital of the company represented and a voting majority of two-thirds of the vote validly cast.

Mark? Yeah, the common merger plan, Mark, contains the conditions precedent to the transaction. Those are clearly stated, but I just would emphasise that those CPs can be waived by the parties in order to allow the effectiveness of the merger to complete.

So hopefully that provides a response to your question.

Sorry Mark, so does that, is there a break free or not? I'm sorry.

Yeah, I'm not going to go into any details about break free, instead I'll focus on the There are conditions precedent to the transaction. Those are clearly stated and can be waived by the parties to allow the transaction to continue.

Okay. Thank you very much. I'll hand it over.

As a final reminder to ask a question, please press star 1 and 1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. Till we've got your question, please press star 1 and 1 again. We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Guillerme Levy from Morgan Stanley. Please ask a question.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. I have a follow-up on Brazil. We saw recently a headline on the Atapuchu bid process. And I remember that in the past you commented that particularly for Buzustan, um what made you less competitive were instructions from from from petrobras in terms of overlap with existing work that you have there uh so so i was wondering if uh for the tapuchu process that also that effect also played a role um with in terms of yeah you uh perhaps not being able to um place the lowest speed just because you have other types of costs or other types of challenges there. And then the second one, just going back to the GEU, how would you classify overall the state of the offshore fleets the two companies. Do you think that both leads were equivalent in terms of maintenance or is any of the two players expected to do some specific catch-up work in terms of topics and to do conclusion or something that you are perhaps lining up to be done just after completion? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks. On the due diligence we did on the fleet, both of us did due diligence on each other's fleets. Both are well maintained. Both are under regular planned maintenance regimes. And both of them need to go through saturated dry dockings and such like. So we don't expect any fundamental changes when we bring the two fleets together. They'll continue on their respective cycles of maintenance and dockings. I'm not going to go into any specific bids because we're actually bidding it at present, so that is not concluded. But my main point about Brazil is there's a portfolio of projects there, and we expect to win our share of the work. I have to keep reminding everybody that we don't have the capability to do everything that's out there, and that's why Petrobras has created a very strong competitive tension in the system. So some projects suit some companies better than others. It's also not just about instructions and the bid. This was a clean bid in terms of instructions. It was also just about availability of assets and timing in which assets are available coming off one job to the next also has a part to play for each of the bidders that puts their prices down. So for us, we reaffirm the fact that we truly believe that we can continue

to serve Petrobras into the future with its portfolio projects, and then we'll get our share of that work. Thank you. We have no further questions at this time.

I will now head back to you for closing remarks.

Well, thank you very much for joining us. I know it's an exceptionally busy day today with a lot of other people reporting. And we look forward to talking to you again at the Q3 results later on this year. Thank you very much. Bye.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.