Var Energi Asa U/Adr

Good morning, everyone, and a warm welcome to Voronashi's first quarter 2025 results. The presentation today will be given by our CEO, Nick Walker, and our CFO, Carlo Santopada. Nick and Carlo will present the results, and afterwards, we will open up for Q&A. I will now give the word to Nick.

Thank you, Ida, and good morning to you all, and a warm welcome to our first quarter 2025 results presentation. I'm pleased to report strong results in line with expectations and that we're on track to deliver transformative growth in 2025. We're once again in a more uncertain market environment and Vore Energy's resilience and flexibility will allow us to navigate successfully through the cycles, which I'll come on to during my remarks this morning. And as a result of our resilience, we continue to provide attractive dividend distributions. Also today, you'll see that we are launching a new company logo with a more modern feel and reflecting the rebranding of ENI, our major shareholder, a year or so ago. I think our rebranding highlights the significant benefits we get from being able to draw on the extensive capabilities and expertise of ENI that we do at multiple levels and which has material value for shareholders. So now let us look at the highlights for the quarter. We delivered operational performance in line with expectations, with production, as you can see, at 272,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in the first quarter, supported by continued strong performance at our operated assets. And in March, we saw the successful startups of Holten East and Johan Casberg projects, which are now both ramping up. We continue to deliver strong financial results with CFFO post-tax in the quarter of $1.3 billion, We maintain our strong focus on cost discipline with reduced operating cost of $11.6 per barrel in the quarter, which is within guidance. Our gas sales strategy continues to create value, and we've locked in around 20% of our gas volumes in the summer period at high prices. We increased liquidity through the recent issuance of 1 billion euro senior notes, which was significantly oversubscribed. And we reduced net debt at the end of the quarter with a leverage ratio of 0.8 times. And 4NG is one of the fastest growing EMPs globally. And we're on track to deliver on our 2025 growth target and unlock future value. We'll add around 180,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day at peak from nine project startups in 2025. And we're on track to deliver over 400,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter this year. The Oten FPSO is now successfully moored at the field location, and the Boulder X project is on track to start up at the end of the second quarter. And our leading exploration track record continues, highlighted by the recent Zagato discovery, unlocking significant potential in the Goliata area. And lastly, we continue to provide attractive shareholder distributions. We confirm a dividend for the first quarter of approximately 12 US cents per share, in line with guidance. which is to be distributed in May. And we're providing Q2 2025 dividend guidance of $300 million, the same as for Q1, which means we've paid stable or growing dividends for the last 13 quarters. And in the current uncertain market environment, VoEnergy's business remains resilient, with a low free cash flow breakeven of around $40 per barrel, averaged over the period 2025 to 2030, and generating between $5 and $9 billion of free cash flow over the same period at an oil price range of $65 to $85 per barrel, inclusive of a planned investment program to sustain production long-term. And with around 70% of our future capital spend uncommitted, this provides us with flexibility to manage the business through the cycles, giving us the option to slow down spend if these lower prices persist. demonstrating the resilience and flexibility of our company. So now let us look at some of the detail. VoEnergy is one of the fastest growing EMPs globally, and we're the third largest oil and gas producer in Norway. And we've built a high quality diversified asset base in all areas of the NCS, with interest in around 50% of all producing fields and infrastructure, and as you can see, a large exploration footprint. We're also one of the largest exporters of gas from Norway, with gas making up a material share of our production mix, 35% in the first quarter. This provides a natural hedge to our financial outlook. And this amazing portfolio, which provides lots of optionality, is driving our growth and sustaining production. And we're stepping up the pace to realize this value. And the mantra in the company is more faster. And I believe we will also incrementally improve the outlook, increasing resources, reducing costs. And you'll see examples today where the business has already moved on from what we outlined at our CMU just a few months ago. This incremental improvement will create significant value. And we are firmly on track to deliver transformational production growth in 2025. from 280,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2024. We'll grow to over 400,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter this year. This is double 2023 levels. This is driven by nine project startups that will happen during the year, adding around 180,000 BOEs per day of new production at peak levels. And we're also guiding approximately 400,000 barrels per day in 2026. And with our high quality portfolio with significant upside, we can organically sustain production at 350 to 400,000 barrels per day towards 2030. And looking now at how we will deliver this production growth in 2025. First quarter production came in at 272,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, which is in line with our expectations. This was supported by excellent production efficiency from our operated assets. As you can see, 97% production efficiency in the quarter. And the nine projects that will drive our production growth through the year are all on track to start up as scheduled. With the key projects being firstly Holton East, which started up in mid-March. This will ramp up as new wells are brought on stream through the year and is expected to reach pre-net production of around 20,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter. Johan Carstberg started up at the end of March and is expected to ramp up to plateau levels of 66,000 barrels per day net during the second quarter. And the Boulder X project, where we're on track to commence production by the end of the second quarter and ramp up over a three to four month period to peak rate of around 70,000 barrels per day net. In addition, we have a significant infill drilling program of more than 30 wells planned to come online during the year. which arrested the decline from existing productions. Around one quarter of the wells were completed in the first quarter. And where we stand today, the company expects to reach the midpoint of the production guidance we've given of 330 to 360,000 barrels per day for the full year 2025, dependent on the startup timing and ramp up profile of the new fields coming online through the year. And we're on track to produce over 400,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter. And now looking at production costs. As you can see, we have a strong trend of reducing unit costs. Operating costs were $11.6 per barrel in the first quarter within the guided range. This is around 20% reduction since 2023 levels. Looking forward, we expect to reduce unit OPEX to around $10 per barrel in the fourth quarter this year. This is driven by the new fields coming on stream that have OPEX of around $4 per barrel and a continued high focus on realizing cost synergies and improvements. And we expect to be able to sustain at this level long term. I think this performance demonstrates strong cost discipline within the organization and is a good example of the incremental improvements I talked about earlier. And responsible operations are key to our license to operate, and our ambition is to be the safest operator. Overall, we have a good safety and environmental trend, which is generally getting better. In the first quarter, we had a good outturn with zero actual serious incidents. This performance takes strong focus every single day. Also, we continue to position the company to adapt to the energy transition. to ensure relevance and investability long-term. We're top quartile in the industry globally on carbon emissions intensity, and our methane emissions continues at the near zero level. So we're already doing very well, but we want to go further, and we're targeting becoming carbon neutral in our net equity operational emissions by 2030. And we'll achieve this through further investments in electrification of our key assets, and direct investment in natural carbon capture projects to offset what we can't reduce. We have a plan in place to achieve this objective. And I'm very pleased that we're getting recognition for our ESG leadership. Sustainalytics rank us as a top rated company. This puts us in the top 10% of the global oil and gas industry. And we continue to be included on the Oslo Stock Exchange ESG index as the only oil and gas company. And I think this is leveraging to how the company is viewed. And now looking at three major projects. Firstly, Holten East project in the Norwegian Sea, which is started up in mid-March on time and on budget. Holten East is the development of several smaller fields tied back to the Asgard facilities. Initially, the production Project is developing 100 million barrels of gross reserves and achieving gross peak production of 80,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. And with significant unrest upside in the area of 100 to 200 million barrels. And the project is in the ramp up phase and production will grow through the year as new wells are bought on stream with the expectation of achieving peak production in the fourth quarter of around 20,000 barrels per day of all energy next year. And I think Holtenese is a great example of leveraging the value of existing infrastructure to provide high-value barrels with short time to market and low carbon emissions. And then Johan Casberg, which started up at the end of March, marking the start of a new era for the Barents Sea region. The field is currently ramping up. 15 of the 30 planned development wells have been completed, which is sufficient to achieve plateau production levels. And the drilling program is scheduled to continue until the end of 2026. This initial phase is developing 450 to 650 million barrels gross. Plateau production levels of 220,000 barrels a day of oil are expected to be achieved within the second quarter, before energy's share being 66,000 barrels per day. So this is an important catalyst for our growth target. for more than 30 years, contributing to significant growth and value creation with an expected payback time of less than two years. And the Owen Casberg area is highly prospective, and several new discoveries made in recent years are already being moved to development, including an extensive infill drilling program planned to be sanctioned this year. Johan Casberg cluster one development costing of two phases is targeting sanction of the first phase being its flak discovery in the next year. And in total, there are between 250 and 550 million barrels of additional gross unrecoverable resources identified in the area. Which is and we anticipate will enable us to keep the facilities full towards 2030. So after years of investments, we see a bright future at Johan Casberg with significant upsides and long-term value creation ahead. And then turning to the Boulder X project, which is nearing completion. You can see that the Jotun FPSO has successfully been moored on schedule in the Boulder field. All that remains is to hook up the FPSO to the subsea facilities, and to complete final commissioning of the vessel before expected startup at the end of the second quarter. All 14 production wells are completed, and we expect production will ramp up to peak levels of 80,000 barrels of oil per day gross within three to four months of production start. And this project will secure production from the Boulder area beyond 2045, unlocking gross 2P reserves of around 150 million barrels. And we have continued to grow our resource base through successful exploration in the area and are stepping up the pace, moving several tieback projects forward at speed to capitalize on the EOT and FPSO. This will sustain production longer term and includes the Boulder Phase 5, planned to come on stream later this year, and Boulder Phase 6, expected to sanction in 2025, together adding a further 45 to 50 million barrels gross. And also in the greater Boulder area, where several new early phase projects are being progressed towards sanction, including Ringhorn North, Boulder Future Phases, and the King Discovery, targeting gross contingent resources of more than 70 million barrels. So the Boulder X project, with a payback time of around two years, including the sanction of Boulder Phase 5 project, marks the startup of a new era in the North Sea. And we see many years of value creation ahead. And Vore Energy has an amazing portfolio with lots of optionality and growth opportunities. Our 2P reserves stand at 1.2 billion barrels. This is either in production or under development and underpins our growth to over 400,000 barrels a day in Q4. And we will stay there a few years, but without investment would then decline. But we are much more than that. We have 2C contingent resources of around 900 million barrels. And we're moving forward around 30 early phase projects accounting for approximately 600 million barrels of resources. And we also have an exciting exploration portfolio of over one billion barrels of net risk resources. We expect to drill out about 50 percent of this opportunity in the next four years. And so putting this together, we have over three billion barrels of resource potential with 60 percent yet to be developed. That's how we will organically sustain production long term. And we're working at pace to create value for this opportunity. And we have a resilient and flexible portfolio of around 30 early phase projects that we're progressing towards development. These are all subsea tiebacks to existing infrastructure with low cost and short time to market. And we're creating a subsea factory with standardization, pre-commitments and contract alliances to reduce costs, improve predictability and speed up time to first production. And we've created real momentum here and a targeting sanction of up to 14 projects by the end of 2025, as indicated on the chart. This is a progression from what we detailed at our CMU. We'll probably not meet all of these dates, but we're confident on achieving the eight project sanctions we guided for this year. With some examples being a Boulder phase six, Fram South project and the Yowe area subsea projects. And this portfolio has strong economics with average break-evens of around $35 per barrel with good rates of return. And with 70% of our future capital uncommitted, we have the flexibility to slow down some activity if the lower price environment continues without impacting near-term production. This could also create the opportunity to drive down costs and make the projects even better. And as we move forward, we'll consider each project on a case-by-case basis. And now moving to exploration. And as you know, Vorenergy has a leading NCS exploration track record with around 50% commercial success rate over the last six years. And this performance continues into 2025 with the Zagato oil discovery as third successful well in a row at the Goliath Ridge. Estimated gross resources discovered on the trend are now up to 100 million barrels of oil, with estimated discovered plus prospective resources increased to above 200 million barrels. This is potentially as big as the original Goliath project. And the Goliath Ridge consists of a series of adjacent bounded prospects next to the Goliath Field, with the same good quality reservoirs as those producing at Goliath. The three wells drilled so far have successfully discovered oil in separate fault blocks, which significantly de-risks the prospectivity in the undrilled areas. And so far, water has not been encountered in any of the wells. So it is possible the whole area is filled with hydrocarbons. And so to delineate this exciting discovery, we'll acquire new seismic this summer and drill two further appraisal wells commencing in the third quarter this year. with the aim that we have all the subsurface data in our hands by the end of the year required to progress a development. And you can see this is in close proximity to the existing infrastructure. And this provides the opportunity for a fast-track, low-emissions, cost-efficient development using the available capacity of the Goliath FPSO, which adds high-value barrels. And this discovery is significant. with the resources in the area to be developed being potentially upwards of 350 million barrels of oil equivalent gross, as you can see on the chart, including upside in the Goliath field, development of the gas resources, and the resources on the Goliath Ridge. And with Vorenergy's 65% interest in the area, if the full potential can be realized, this could add over 15% to the company's book 2P reserves. So this is a material opportunity, and we will de-risk it at pace. And as we previously announced, we've stepped up the pace of exploration with around 20 wells planned this year. That will make us the second most active explorer on the NCS. There are some key wells to be drilled in the next two quarters, and so it's going to be exciting to see these results come in. So that rounds off my operational update, and I'll now hand over to Carlo to review the financials. Thank you.

Thank you, Nick, and good morning to all.

I would like to start by summarizing the key financial highlights of the first quarter. We generated strong revenues and an operating cash flow after tax of $1.3 billion in Q1. We maintained a strong and resilient balance sheet with a leverage ratio at 0.8 net debt to EBITDAX and $2.7 billion in available liquidity. In the quarter, we successfully issued 1 billion euros of senior notes, which was more than four times oversubscribed. We confirm the first quarter dividend of $300 million and we are showing confidence in our business by planning to pay another $300 million for the second quarter of 2025. All in all, we have a strong and resilient financial position and we are successfully progressing in what will be a transformational year for VorEnergy. I will now get into more details about our first quarter financial performance. We continue to realize strong prices. In the quarter, we generated more than $1.8 billion of revenue up versus previous quarter, mainly due to higher sales volumes and higher prices in the quarter. The realized oil price in the quarter was $76 per BOE, in line with the brand. The realized gas price was $87 per BOE, also in line with the reference spot prices. Going forward, we have used our flexible gas sales contracts to lock in high prices in the summer months, We have already executed fixed price transactions with customers, resulting in approximately 20% of our gas production from Q2 and Q3 being sold at approximately $90 per BOE. We continue to have a robust sales portfolio with access to several markets, and we have flexibility in the contracts to decide the split between month ahead, day ahead, and fees contracts. I also would like to mention that our oil production is fully edged on a post-tax basis for the remaining of 2025, with monthly put options at a strike price of $50 per B.O.E. On the back of a solid operational performance at stronger prices, we have high cash flow generation in the quarter compared to last quarter and the same quarter last year. Cash flow from operation after tax in the quarter was $1.3 billion, an increase from the previous quarter mainly due to lower tax payment, higher sold volumes, and higher prices. Our capex for the quarter, including exploration, was $595 million, where Balderex and Johan Casberg remain the largest contributor of the total spend. The 2025 development capex guidance of $2.3 to $2.5 billion given at our CMU is maintained. Our resilient and strong liquidity position improved in the quarter. Here we see the development in our cash position from Q4 2024 to the end of Q1 2025. We generated approximately $1.5 billion CFO before tax and working capital movements. Working capital contributed positively with around $50 million, mainly as a result of a decrease in trade receivable. We paid one tax installment in the quarter amounting to $213 million, down from almost $800 million in the previous quarter. We further had a cash outflow of $628 million in investments in our high-value growth projects. We distributed a splendid $270 million in dividend related to the four-quarter 2024. In summary, we have a solid liquidity position. and a diversified long-term capital structure aligned with our business needs. At the end of the quarter, we have a cash balance of $660 million and an overall available liquidity of around $2.7 billion. During the quarter, we have reduced our net debt by approximately $180 million, with a leverage ratio net interest-bearing debt on EBITDAX at 0.8. This is stable from the previous quarter and continues to be well below our over-the-cycle target of below 1.3. In the quarter, we successfully issued 1 billion euro senior notes, attractively priced with being more than four times oversubscribed. Our debt portfolio is well diversified, with a weighted average time to maturity of five years when excluding the 60 years hybrid bond. This is supporting the execution of our growth strategy towards 2030 and beyond. We have a BAA3 rating from Moody's and a Tribal B rating from Standard & Poor's, both with a stable outlook, and we are committed to maintain our investment grid rating. Our strong financial position and our resilient and flexible project portfolio lay a solid foundation for continued material shareholder distribution and growth, and this is a unique investment proposition that Boer Energy offers.

Now, Let's look at the tax guidance for this year.

In the first quarter, we paid 2.4 billion NOC in cash taxes. And for the next quarter, we have two tax installments amounting to around 5 billion NOC. These are all related to 2024 results. At mid-year, we will update the tax estimate for 2025. And tax payments in the second half of this year will be based on 2025 estimated profits. Half of the taxes are paid this year, and half will be paid the next year. We have included a tax sensitivity for the second half of 2025, which is giving the cash tax estimate at different price scenarios. The middle case is giving around $1.6 billion in total payments for the second half of the year, while the sensitivity is between $1.1 and $2.1 billion, according to the indicated price ranges. Note that from the second half of this year, we will move from paying 6 installments per year to 10 installments per year. Vorenergy has a strong track record of delivering value to our shareholders. Since the IPO, we have returned more than $3.5 billion in dividend, maintaining stable payments over the last 13 quarters. With a strong financial performance in the first quarter of 2025, a solid operational outlook, and a resilient and flexible project portfolio, we can continue to support attractive and predictable dividends going forward. We confirm $300 million in dividend for the first quarter, which is equivalent to $12 cents per share to be paid on the end of May. The dividend guidance for the second quarter is $300 million, supported by the planned production growth. Looking forward, our dividend policy remains unchanged, with 25% to 30% of the CFF after-tax allocated to shareholder distribution over the cycle. We will continue guiding on a quarterly basis, considering the macroenvironment and operational performance. 2025 will be a transformative year for the company in terms of production growth, resulting in a significant profit and cash flow generation, ample to cover the guided evidence for the year. Finally, I will summarize our full year 2025 and long-term guidance. For 2025, our production guidance is 330,000 to 360,000 buyers per day, reaching more than 400,000 barrels per day by Q4 2025. We will maintain approximately 400,000 barrels per day in 26, and further, we will sustain 350 to 400,000 barrels per day until 2030. 2025 production cost will be $11 to $12 per barrel, down to around $10 per barrel by Q4 as we ramp up production. CAPEX will be at $2.3 to $2.5 billion in 2025, going down to $2 to $2.5 billion thereafter. Exploration expenses and ABEX will be in the range of $200 to $300 million and $150 million respectively. For this year, we plan to invest around $350 million in exploration activities. We are guiding on $300 million in dividends for Q2 2025, and we are maintaining the dividend guidance at 25 to 30% of the CFFO post-tax for the longer term. With that, I hand it back to Nick for the concluding remarks. Thank you.

Thank you, Carlo. And I've just one final side to summarize the first quarter results. We achieved strong financial results and performance in the quarter. And this is supported by operation performance in line with expectations. We're once again in a more volatile price environment, and our resilient business with low cash flow breakeven and capital flexibility will allow us to navigate successfully through the cycles. As you've heard, we've reduced net debt and have a high available liquidity. And we're on track with our major projects to deliver transformational growth to over 400,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter this year. And so we're delivering on our strategy for growth and value creation. And as a result of our strong performance and resilience, we continue to provide attractive dividend distributions. These are our first quarter 2025 results and are the reasons to be invested in Vore Energy. So thank you for your time. And we'd now like to open up the call for your questions.

If you do wish to ask a question, you will need to press five star on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press five star again. There'll be a brief pause while questions are being registered. Our first question comes from the line of Lydia Rainforth from Barclays. Please go ahead, Julianne, I'll be unmuted.

Thank you, and good morning, and thank you, as ever, for the presentation and the results. Two questions, if I could. The first one, just in terms of the production side of the BoulderX talking NTQ platform, as this year. In terms of the production guidance, what takes you to the top of the production guidance range now or is this really kind of case of we can just consolidate around the middle of the range? And then secondly, on the dividend side, clearly the yield is high at the moment and quite a lot of the questions that I've had this morning is like how sustainable is the dividend as we get into basically the end of this year and next year? So if you could just kind of reflect a little bit on the dividend sustainability, that'd be really helpful. Thank you.

Good, Lydia. Good morning and good questions. In terms of the production guidance, we guided at the capital markets day 330 to 360, and we guided that we'd be over 400,000 barrels a day in Q4. And this is a progression through the year. And, you know, first quarter came in within line with our expectations. We've now bought on the Halton East and Yon Kasper projects. We have the other major project is the Boulder project to come online in the end of Q2. But we have another six projects. obviously smaller. And it's the timing of the exact timing of the startup of all of these and the ramp up that provides and the pace of ramp up that provides the range. And we still believe that we can deliver within the range that we've set out. We're guiding the midpoint, but there is an upside case that we do better than that. And where we stand now at the end of April, we're in a good place to deliver all of this. I think on the dividend outlook, maybe I'll provide my reflections and then if Carlo wants to add something. We will grow to production of over 400,000 barrels a day this year. We've set out that we can We've also guided production next year of 400, and we've guided 350 to 400 out towards 2030. And what drives that is a continuous investment into the subsurface opportunity near to our fields. And what I said is, and what we've set out on numerous occasions, is that we're moving forward a portfolio of projects. These are now around 30 projects, subsea projects, that develop around 600 million barrels. And we continue to explore and we're having success, which will create new projects. And it's that stream of projects that we're investing into that will sustain our production long term. And the investment metrics of these are $35 breakeven and 25% rate of return or more. And so these create a lot of value over time. And so we believe we can sustain our production long term at 350 to 400, maybe even grow longer term. And if we deliver on that program, we deliver sustainable cash flow over a long period of time. And as we set out at our capital markets day, we generate free cash flow of between five and nine billion dollars between now and 2030. at an oil price range of $65 to $85 per barrel and a gas price range that steps down over time. So when you put that together in the context of paying just over a billion dollars of dividend per year, you can see that we can easily sustain this long term. And so I think that is the message. And to believe that, you have to believe that we're going to deliver the major projects this year to over 400,000 barrels a day. And we're in a good place to do that. And you have to believe that we're going to sanction all of these new projects and, uh, and we're going to sanction quite a number of them. As I said, we, we, we gave a guidance of eight sanctions this year. Actually, we're working on 14 potential sanctions this year. I think we may not get them all, but, uh, they'll come very soon. Uh, and that's half of the portfolio. And, uh, And so I believe that we're going to be able to deliver this, and that's how we can sustain dividends long-term.

Hopefully that covers your question. That's super helpful. Thank you. Thank you very much, Nick.

Thank you, Lydia. The next question will be from the line of Theodore Nielsen from SB1 Markets. Please go ahead. You will now be unmuted.

Good morning, Nick and Carlo, and thanks for taking my questions. A few questions for me. First, Nick, you talked about the Balder phase 5 and 6. Are those two phases sufficient to arrest decline, or should we still expect some decline on the entire Balder area when those two come on screen? Second question there, it's on Kasper. Could you just comment on the performance on Kasper, the first few weeks of production? And finally, just following up on the dividend question, but now in the short term, of course, there's a highly uncertain macro environment now. Demand estimates will probably come down over the next few months. Just wonder, in the short term, dividend for Q3 and Q4, how much lower oil price could we see and it will still maintain the $300 million dividend per quarter?

Thank you.

Okay, thanks, Theodore, and good morning. Good questions. In Boulder Phase 5, this is a series of six infill wells using the remaining slots. These already started drilling and start producing at the end of this year and come online during next year. And then Phase 6, actually, we intend to sanction around the middle of the year, and we expect that to start producing at the end of next year. So that shows a speed and that we're moving forward. We also, as I mentioned in my remarks, so that's about 45 to 50 million barrels, those two projects. And then we have a series of other projects, Ringhorn North, a King development, and also further in full or sort of phases of Boulder, which added around another 70 million barrels. And we're working to move those forward. And we haven't set it out so far, but actually we can see keeping flat production in here towards 2030. That's what we're working towards. And we have a series of projects to be able to make that happen. So that's sort of how we see it. We just have to deliver this a bit quicker than had been contemplated. And that's what we're doing. Moving on to Johan Casberg. It only started up a few weeks ago. In the early phase, you bring on some wells and then they have to get the gas compression system working. We can't flare large amounts of gas. Until the gas compression system is running stably, you can't ramp up many more wells. At the moment, there's a few wells producing and it's at low rates. That gas compression commissioning is ongoing. But I expect once that's sort of stable operations, that we'll see the ramp up going very quickly. And as we say, we're expecting to achieve plateau production within Q2 there. And then on the dividend question, I'll ask Carlo to answer that.

Sure. So when it comes to dividends, clearly we're not seeing a lot of volatility up and down in the price. Our dividend guidance for the quarter and our plan for 2025 is really related to the production growth and the plan, which is going as per expectation. So this is where we are confident about the sustainability of the dividend level, because it's really based on our production growth and production ramp up. What we see in the macro is really moving very fast up and down. But technically and operationally speaking, we're moving in the right direction. So, yeah, we maintain confidence about sustainability of the dividend even in the short term, considering our portfolio, production performance, and the flexibility in our portfolio.

Okay, understood. Thank you.

Thank you, Teodo. The next question will be from Mark Wilson from Jefferies. Your line will be unmuted.

Okay, thank you for taking my question. I'd like to ask a bit more about the Goliath potential. Please, Nick. Excellent to see the exploration success there. But can we just get an idea of what sort of spare capacity we're looking at across that facility? I imagine there is quite some spare oil capacity. So what's it producing now versus what it could be? And I think the discoveries to date have mainly been gas. And I see Goliath gas as one of your potential 14 sanctions this year. So what would you be envisaging a potential gas development there? Thank you.

Yeah, it's a good question, Mark. I mean, you know, Goliath was on plateau for a short period of time, a few years, and then it's declined. And we're producing around 30,000 barrels a day gross there. So actually, we're about the third full. So we've got lots of spare capacity. It's a fantastic facility, very high uptime. I think it was close to 100% in the first quarter. So it's a great facility. And what you'll see is that this Goliath Ridge discovery is just a few kilometers away. So Yeah, actually, the Countash is 15 kilometers, the Gato is 7, and Goliath North is almost on the same edge of the field. So this is in real tieback, quick pace and bring it on. And this Goliath Ridge is on oil. What we're quoting here is the oil resources. There are some gas here as well. And actually, there's a lot of upside here. And so it's a very exciting prospect and opportunity. We call these different names, but actually it's one discovery. So it's an appraisal program in my view. And the question is actually how big is it? 100 million barrels? Is it somewhere over 200? And we'll find that out during this year. So that's one component to this. The other aspect around Goliath is we inject all the gas into the reservoir. And there's 100 million barrels of BOE of gas resources here. And at some point we have to develop this. And the discussion we've got is that we would develop this into to snow it and and and receive. Revenue of this from this, you know, when stove it has capacity available, so it may be some time before we see it, but it's an enabler project. It's relatively low cost because it's a short tie tie in from the facility to to to the snow with gas pipeline. And so that's part of it. And then we also have. Further, we continue to drill infill wells at Goliath. The recovery factor here is about 35%. Our ambition is to get it to 50%. We're sidetracking existing wells, but we've run out of well slots on the subsea template. There's another 40 or 50 million barrels of upside resources here, which we're looking to develop oil reserves. And, you know, as part of this overall development of the area that we were looking at putting more facilities in there, too. So that's why I say there's upwards of 350 million barrels of potential here. And it's something that we're going to spend the effort to de-risk very quickly over the next year. next six months or so to be in a place that we can start to think about moving forward a development in the early part of next year. So hopefully that answers your question, Mark.

Okay, so to summarize, you're looking to divert the existing gas you're injecting to Shnuravit, but the discoveries would be oil tiebacks, granted that you need more slots.

Yeah, well, so oil tiebacks with some pipelines. So Goliath North is just a few kilometers from the FPSO, but Countash is 15 kilometers. These are all short tiebacks. So we would be putting in place, obviously, templates tied into the facility. And, you know, the question is how many templates and how many wells? And that's the question we need to answer.

Great. Okay. Thank you very much. I'll hand it over.

Thank you, Mark. The next question will be from the line of Matthew Smith from Bank of America. You'll now be unmuted.

Hi there. Morning, Nick. Morning, Carlo. Thanks for taking my question. I just had one really, I think, touching on some of the similar themes. around sort of capital allocation, dividend sustainability. And it's really because we talked a lot about doing more faster, investing in new projects, new FIDs to sort of sustain levels of production after you grow it this year. But I suppose today you're also keen to have highlights the flexibility that you have in your capex budget, the amount of uncommitted capex that you have. So, I guess I just really wanted to test what oil prices do you think you need to see before you start to actually utilize some of that capex flexibility? And perhaps I could sort of attach to that. And to what end? Are you really managing the sort of investment grade credit rating here? Is this about the debt maturities or is it about protecting the dividend itself? Thank you.

It's a good question, and it covers quite a few things, Matt. Long-term, we intend to maintain an investment-grade credit rating. We intend to maintain resilience and flexibility. I think those are three things that we want to maintain as a company long-term, and I think this resilience and flexibility. Before even the oil price came down, we've been highlighting the resilience and flexibility of the company. And, you know, what I know is in this business, it goes through cycles and you need to be prepared for the good times and the bad times. And and that's what we are. So as a company, so this resilience, flexibility and we will use it. You know, we've we set out a capital markets day that. Two point three to two point five billion dollars of capital on investments in developments this year and a range of two to two and a half out to 2030 per annum. And, you know, that range still stands, but as I mentioned, we have the choices here. We have, you know, our big projects have come to an end. And what we have is a whole series of subsidy tieback projects into existing infrastructure and a series of infill drilling opportunities. And the infill drilling opportunities come at $30 breakeven. And there are subsidy tiebacks at an average of about $35 break even. So these projects make money, good returns, even at $65. So they're good things to invest into. But we will also take the opportunity to potentially use the flexibility here. So, you know, for example, a project that we might invest, a subsidy tieback development that we might invest into and commit to this year might not start production until 28 or 29. So spend now doesn't have an impact on production for some years in some cases. And so delaying that six months or a year doesn't really make a lot of difference in the outlook for the company in terms of production, but it does have an impact in reducing our capital usage. And we will make, as I pointed out in my speaking notes, that we will look at each of these commitments on a case-by-case basis. and make a judgment as to how critical it is to move that forward, what the time criticality is, what the other constraints are, with a thought in our mind about if this price level continues, perhaps we want to take down the capital spend a bit and slow down the pace. But We're going to drive as fast as we can to get these projects going, and then we will make that decision. The message is keep going fast, and then we will make a decision on a case-by-case basis. I've been through these cycles before, and I think this creates opportunity. It makes opportunity for us to make some of these projects better, maybe more efficient, maybe take down the costs. And we need to use that opportunity. It also creates acquisition opportunity potentially in the market for strong companies like us. So, you know, your question is multifaceted. The answer is multifaceted. And it's about maintaining that resilience, that flexibility and using it to optimize the company continuously.

I just wanted to compliment on what Nick was mentioning. During the CMU, we indicated a free cash flow generation of $5 to $9 billion between $65 and $85 per barrel. And that was based on spending our full CapEx plan without touching, as you mentioned, the flexibility that we have. So this gives a bit also the sense that of the possibility and the opportunity we have in our portfolio, as well as the resilience of our balance sheet when it comes to finance our projects through the CFFO and not really touching our leverage. So I believe also this gives you the sense of the strength of our financials, our balance sheet and the flexibility we have in adapting quickly to a possible low macro environment, lower than what we might imagine.

Hopefully that answers the question.

Thank you, Matt. The next question will be from the line of Victoria McCulloch from RBC. Your line will be unmuted.

Hi, thanks very much. So just a quick follow-on from that previous question. Could you give us an idea of how much CAPEX is committed for 2026 relative to the projects sanctioned? And then maybe a bigger picture on the portfolio of projects. What are the biggest challenges in accelerating these towards FID between now and over the next couple of years? Is it the geology they need better understanding it on or are there more complexities in adding these tiebacks? And then just a final one that I might have missed. What's the ramp up or the expected ramp up for Halton East? That'd be great. Thanks very much.

I'll capture Halton East to start with. And, you know, that is a series of fields developed into Asgards and these are subsea tiebacks areas. And it started up, currently two wells are producing, and it's going to step up to 80,000 barrels a day, BOEs per day gross by Q4. So I think there are eight wells to come online, but it doesn't need eight to get there. So it will step up to the peak rate in Q4. So we should expect it to gradually step up through the year. We're producing just a little over half, actually, our peak rate at the moment. Then in terms of committed capital, does Paolo want to?

Yes, sure. Committed capital, as you mentioned, we have over the plan 26, 20, 30, 70% roughly, specifically from 2026, if we got your question right. This is a bit less than 70%. It's probably closer to 50, 60%, because clearly speaking, the commitment goes unwinding through the time as soon as we move projects forward, and we're already moving projects forward. And yes, this is the range you can consider for 2026 specifically, over the 70% average for the longer period.

Victor, does that capture your questions? yeah and it was just and then you know maybe the bigger picture and what's the biggest challenge in accelerating the project you know not specifically one one project but you know broadly uh you know the i i would say the challenge is getting the momentum into this and we now have it and uh so the challenge is sort of behind us it's about now delivering on this and uh We've got the people, we've got the projects, and each one of these is a bit, they're all different. The complexity associated with them, there's commercial activity, there's subsurface work to do, there's engineering work, then you have to time the top side element with other activities. Each of these is a little complex, but I mean, they're fundamentally the same type of projects. We're trying to move these forward as a subsea project factory with substandardization of equipment and engineering design, which would shorten the time cycle. And so, you know, I think we're in a good place to do this. I mean, we sanctioned Boulder Phase 5 in October last year. It's going to come online. First Wells in Q4 this year. We are going to sanction Boulder Phase 6 in the middle of this year, and it should start up at the end of next year. And, you know, we've got a similar momentum through many of our other projects. So, you know, I feel in a good place. I mean, we highlighted eight projects at a capital markets update, and now we're saying we potentially have 14 projects for sanction this year. So I think that gives you a sense that we're moving this forward at pace.

Great. Thanks very much for your time.

Thank you, Victoria. The next question will be from Delano Sathikan Chilukuru from Morgan Stanley. Your lamina will be unmuted.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. I have two left, actually. The first one was on the Baldrick startup, which was reiterated. by end of 2Q. Now with the U-turn FPSO now moved at the field location, I was just wondering if there are any other milestones that we can actually look for or monitor before the startup. Anything that would provide the market more confidence on the startup timeline. Also, if you could talk about any contingencies that you already have in the startup, that would be helpful. The second was on working capital and the underlift positions. We've seen An underlift position in sales, I suppose, this quarter, in even previous quarter, in 1Q and as well as 4Q. Just wondering if that board is any potential to reverse that front. Also on working capital, we've seen working capital inflow this year, this quarter. Would that be, is there any potential for that to reverse over the next couple of quarters?

Okay, so I'll capture the first question on Boulder, and then Carlo will do the second. You know, we set out a revised schedule for Boulder, I think it was last September, October time, and we've met every date that we set out in that. And first of all, was a sail away in March, which achieved on, I think, the 15th of March. The vessel is now moored fully moored in the field long term successfully done uh on time and we're currently in the process of what's left to do now is to to hook up the uh the vessel to the subsea facility so pulling the risers and we're in the process of doing that and then it's to uh tie in the risers into the vessel and uh and the critical path runs through that activity actually the other activities running in parallel is to finally commission the vessel and we have a flow towel connected with a significant number of beds and i think 275 people working on the vessel every day and we're front end loading that activity And so I would say there aren't any real milestones that you can pin on except for First Oil, which we're saying is going to be in the end of June. And, you know, we've taken a lot of the risk out the time as we've met the schedule that we set out. And we've obviously taken a lot of risk out with that. And so it's just about meeting those activities that we need to complete before we get to First Oil. I would say we're in a good place, and hopefully we can come back, and I'm expecting that we come back and say in June that we've achieved it. Then, Carlo, you're going to cover working capital?

We'll start from the working capital, as you mentioned, with an overall positive movement in working capital of $49 million. This is a mix, of course, of... small movements when it comes from the payables and the receivables, although nothing is really unusual. More specifically, when it comes to the under-overlifting position, we have over-lifted oil in Q1, and if you recall, during the Q4 2024, we actually were in a higher under-lifting position, so we are recovering the under-lifting position. It's not yet fully recovered, but it's unwinding. At the same time, we'll build up a bit of underlifting position for NGL, but also this will have wind starting from April. All in all, I would say really operational movement, nothing unusual.

I hope I answered your question.

Thank you. Indeed.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Thank you, Sathikant. The next question will be from the line of John Oloysen from ABG. Please go ahead. Your line will now be unmuted.

Good morning, everybody, and thanks for taking my question. I'm sorry about another question about the dividend and the sustainability, but I get a lot of questions about the free cash flow that's referred to 5 to 9 billion US dollars over the six-year period, sorry, in total over the average over the 25 to 30 years. assuming, as you mentioned, $65 to $85 oil price. But if you assume a midpoint, which is oil price of $75 in that guidance range and $7 billion in free cash flow per year, and if you divide that by six years, you get about $1.1 billion, which is slightly below your current run rate on a dividend of $1.2 billion. And I presume from that pre-cash flow of five to nine, the range that you're indicating, I presume we also have to use that to lower the debt level. Isn't that correct? So two questions. Is that like a fair calculation that you need $75 oil price roughly to keep the current dividend flat over the next six years, assuming your capex plan, of course? And how about the debt level? Is that assuming it? Basically, it looks like you need $75 oil price to sustain the current dividend without reducing debt. Is that completely awful or is that the right calculation? Is that how we should look at it?

I think, I mean, maybe Carlo can answer in a second. But I mean, the way to look at this is that, first of all, we're investing through this period for long term and we only show production out to 2030. And, you know, we're investing now for many of the investments come online towards 29, 2030 and obviously provide value beyond that period of time. So I think you need to look at it longer term than that. We're not guiding longer than that. But much of our investment in this period of time is to provide cash flow outside of that period of time. So, you know, the point being is that we can continue to sustain debt long term. Uh, as a company and, uh, you know, it gets down to the fact that we've only got $1.2 billion barrels of 3 billion barrels developed. That is what the value opportunity is. And we are continuing to invest into it. Secondly, uh, you know, you think you need to look at, uh, uh, dividend guidance of 25 to 30% of is a. There's two aspects here. One is it's a formula, which is based on CFFO, which obviously has the potential to adjust over time, depending on what cash flow is, which has a lot of aspects that drive it. But we also have a track record of trying to sustain a sustaining dividend over the period. So for the last 13 quarters, we've sustained or grown the dividend level. And we feel that with all the factors that we've got to play and the opportunities to optimize the portfolio, that we can continue to maintain dividend payments in the longer term. And there's a lot of flexibility in the portfolio to adjust and optimize as we go. And I think we've got a track record of doing that. And I think we can continue to do that.

I guess it's just pure math. The low end of the free cash flow pipe, five divided by six years, is $800 million per year, compared to the run rate of $1.2 billion at $65. It seems like It seems like you need 65 is not enough. Just from that match, you refer to that match. I'm just saying.

But I think there's a number of aspects in here. First of all, if we continue at $65, the cost base is going to go down. We do not do that. If we continue at 65, maybe we'll spend less money on exploration. Maybe we'll slow down some of the developments. And the cost of doing things will reduce. None of that is reflected in the basis on which we show the cash flow outlook. We just take the same cost base that we had when the oil price was $80, and we run forward with a lower oil price. I think if you want to look at a $65 case, we have to take down the cost. Long term, we have to take down the cost, and we perhaps have to take down the activity levels. We also assume in our cash flow outlook that we spend a lot of money on exploration with zero success. That is in the basis of what we've said. And we're not going to continue to spend $350 million a year on exploration with zero success year after year. And the reality is we are having success. So it's creating more projects and value. So I think you have to look at our... our cash flow outlooks in a slightly more sophisticated way than just running them at different oil prices and assuming. And, you know, unfortunately, it's not that easy for us to demonstrate it in a different way because, you know, working out what the optimizations are if you have a period of low prices are not that easy to do. But, you know, the reality is we're not hooked into spending money a lot of capital over a long period of time. We have a sort of series of small decisions to make that we can optimize. And, you know, if we're doing projects that break even at $35 and infill wells at $30, we're going to make a lot of money out of doing it. And, you know, we've shown that we're reducing our cost base over time. Last year, we showed a free cash flow break even of $45 on the portfolio. Now it's down at $40. We continue to invest in better projects. We continue to drive down operating costs. And as I said, I think we can progressively make the company better over time. So, you know, we feel when we look at this in a range of different scenarios that we can continue to support long-term dividend payments.

And finally, just a housekeeping question. You're right that the Snowvit field will be shut down for three months. Sorry, we'll have a three-month turnaround. I just wonder, will the production completely be shut down for three months for Snowvit now in Q2?

It will be, yeah.

All right. All right. Thanks a lot for taking my question. Thank you.

Thank you, John. As no one else has lined up for questions in this call, I'll now hand it over to Ida for any written questions.

Thank you. We have a couple of questions towards the end here. One question from Vidar Lingvar at Danske Bank. Regarding the 70% uncommitted CapEx, can you please provide a split between operated and non-operated share of this uncommitted CapEx?

Yes, we can consider that it's roughly 60% not operated and 40% operated.

But I think it's also worth noting that we have some control over a lot of the operated spend. So our vote is mostly required to move most of it forward. So it's not like we're sort of pushed into doing things.

And last question on capital distribution. Is share buyback something that War Energy could consider doing in the future?

We get this question quite a lot. And I think the pushback here is that we have a big shareholder in E&I with 63%. And there's a relatively low free float for the company and 37%. And so I think... I think we have to demonstrate, I think our job as leadership is to demonstrate to the market that we're undervalued and to continue to pay strong dividends and deliver on the growth and sustainment strategy. And I think that will drive through to the share price. And if in a year or two, we're still struggling to demonstrate that, I think maybe we have to think about it slightly differently. But the challenge we have is with such a small free flow, A lot of bigger investors we meet say, you know, we like the story, but actually there's not enough flexibility for us to come into the liquidity to come in to be an investor, and that puts people off. So I struggle with the notion of buying back shares, actually. I think the strategy we've got is good, and then we just need to keep just delivering on it. And people will see what a great opportunity it is to invest into something that yields 17%.

Great. Thank you very much. That concludes the Q&A session and the Q1 2025 presentation. Thank you all for dialing in. We wish you a good rest of the day.