Addnode Group AB (publ)

Hello, everyone, and welcome to the presentation of the Adnode Group Q2 report for 2024. I'm the CEO of Adnode Group, Johan Andersson, and with me, I am our CFO, Kristina Erström-Mackintosh. And I know it's a busy day for most of you and a lot of reporting companies. So thank you for taking this opportunity to listen to this as well. So for today, We will follow an agenda. We dive into Q2 and a little bit about what we believe the investment case is. And then we'll open up for questions. And then you'll find some supporting material in the appendix as well. So looking at Q2 2024, we believe that it was a quarter with growth and robust earnings improvement. uh it was a strong quarter friend group we had organic and acquired growth and a robust improvement in earnings net sales increased by 29 percent 11 percent was currency adjusted organic growth ebitda increased with 37 47 percent to 162 millions and earnings per share improved by 64 percent we also had a strong cash flow from from operating activities, who increased to 178 million compared to 127 million in Q2 last year. Looking at the quarter, we can see that we had a strong growth for symmetry in division design management. We had an addition of the acquisition of Team D3, and the cost efficiency in product lifecycle management contributed also to the positive development in the quarter. After the end of the quarter, we have announced two smaller acquisitions, Prime Aerostructures in the product lifecycle management division and Adoceo in the process management division. Looking at the economic situation, we can see there's still some uncertainties. Although customers are postponing major investments in new products, there are many opportunities for upselling to existing customers driving growth. Looking at rolling 12 months, we are now at the net sales above eight billions and profits are trending up. I'm proud of our employees' ability to both pursue daily improvements and invest in new digital solutions and carry out acquisitions, all with the customer in focus. With that as an introduction to Q2, I would like to hand over to our CFO, Kristina.

Thank you, Johan. and i would like to start by sharing a few more details on the net sales development and the revenue breakdown and we have two pie charts in front of us and that is showing the breakdown on essays from two different perspectives so if we look at the pie chart to the left we are presenting a breakdown on that phase by geography and the international expansion into the u.s market has been strengthened by the acquisitions of Symmetry US, which was formerly named under Microdesk, and Team D3 in Design Division. And you can see that approximately 28% of the revenue come from the US market, and that is the same level as Sweden. And then it's followed by UK of 19%, and Germany 10%, and other countries was about 15%. And going down to the pie chart to the right, we can see a breakdown of net sales by category. And we can see also that the recurring revenue continued to form a stable foundation for our business. And in the quarter it mounts to 72% of net sales. And recurring revenue consists of both third-party sales and also revenue from our own solutions. And we can also see that the service revenue increased about 15% in total this quarter. And that consists of both service related services relating to our own software offerings and also customer specific solutions. And also the largest increase in consulting services is coming from acquisitions in the design divisions. And then I would like to hand back to Johan from Divisions Details.

Thank you, Kristina. So looking at Anna Group, everything we do is about digitalization for a better society. This is why we exist and what we want to achieve in everything we do. Our digital solutions transform both the private and the public sector to design, build and operate more sustainable products, buildings and societies. Our key markets enjoy a strong and continuous growth driven by global trends in urbanization, digitalization, automation, AI, and sustainability. And I would like to share three examples of what we mean by that. So in a rapidly changing world, responsible and efficient use of resources is crucial when it comes to building a long-term sustainable society. And these are three concrete examples of how we are working with our customers to develop digital solutions for efficient resource use and a more sustainable society. Looking to the left, you have an example of proactive maintenance strategy that saves time and money. Our company SWE have supported catering NHS in the UK with digital solutions to collect and digitalize information on drawings, equipment and transportation data, among other things. The time spent on maintenance is now reduced with dissolution, and so are delays in clinic services. This more proactive maintenance strategy now saves about 4,000 pounds every week year-round for catering NHS. In the middle, you'll find an example of more efficient simulation that reduces carbon emissions from buildings. Our company Teknia supported Catapult in developing a more efficient simulation tool for energy usage in buildings and assessments of low carbon heating systems. After the improvements, Catapult can now offer faster evaluation, selection, and implementation of technologies that reduces carbon emissions from a building's heating and cooling systems. And the third one, looking to the right, is an example of a platform for circular and recyclable packaging. Our company, Deserno, has developed a new business and logistics platform for the organization Näringslivets Prudentansvar in Sweden. It's a platform that has the capacity to enable customers, businesses and municipalities to achieve higher recycling rates, as well as supporting manufacturers and recycling facilities to design more sustainable packaging. So it's three good examples of how we can help our customers with digital solutions to make sure that we develop digital solutions for more efficient resource use. So with that and an introduction, let's go back to our three divisions. As you all know, we are organized in three divisions, design management, product lifecycle management, and process management. And looking at the distribution of our three divisions, you can see clear to the right that design management represents roughly half of our earnings. Product lifecycle management, 20%, and process management, 30% in Q2. So design management. Second quarter, we had a net sales up increase with 56% to roughly 1.2 billion. Adjusted for currency, organic growth was 22%. We can see improved sales in both Europe and U.S. The acquisition of Team D3 and the product mix with a higher share of revenue from Autodesk-free agreements has also contributed to the significant improvement in the quarter. The division's operation within digital solutions for design, BIM, and product data, which are conducted by Symmetry, experienced increased demand and strong sales during the quarter, with the sales mixed with the larger share of Autodesk agreements compared with the corresponding period last year. Saves in the UK were strong both to the construction and manufacturing industries. In the US, we noticed stronger saves to architects and technical consultants compared with the preceding year. But please observe that last year's comparative figures were impacted by weak saves, mainly in the US. The cost reductions implemented in the US operations in 2023 continued to contribute to earnings in the second quarter. Moreover, the acquisition of Team D3, which was completed in July 2023, contributed positively both to net sales and earnings. ServiceWare's Global, which provides digital solutions for facility management, and Trivia, which provides collaborative solutions for the construction and infrastructure sector, display stable growth. So, looking at the change in the new transaction model that we have discussed earlier we can see that we are now moving into a situation where we have had the the us exchange was completed in june 10 2024 that means that we are starting to sell according to the new transaction model but please be aware what The rev rec is when the start of the contract. That means that we can sell according to the new transaction model, but the start day of the contract can be at a later date. So there's a delay there in between. So that means here in the Q2, we have very little impact in our books of the new transaction model. I think it's way below 10 million SEK in net sales. that we have recognized according to new transaction model in Q2. So you will see the effect in Q3 starting there. And then in Europe, there has been announced a date saying that the transition will start in September 2024. So that means that we will start to sell according to the new transaction model in Europe as well, end of September. And that means that you will probably not see any real effect our P&L of new transaction model from Europe in Q3 it will probably happen in Q4 and that you will see the effect. So with that I think let's move on to PLM. In the second quarter for PLM, net sales were unchanged at 468 million. Adjusted for currency effect, the organic growth was minus 2%. However, EBITDA increased to 37 million. The cost efficiency measures implemented in 2023 meant that the EBITDA margin improved from 4.3% to 7.9% in the quarter, despite negative organic growth. Earnings for the previous year were also affected by a cost of 10 million in Q2 2023. Demand for PLM systems and associated services was good in the Nordic countries. Sales were slightly weaker in Germany, UK and US due to a decline in licensees in the automotive industry. The economic situation interest rates have affected customers' decision-making processes concerning new and larger system projects investment leading to more frequent postponements during the year. Service revenues, implementation, integration, et cetera, was somewhat higher than in the previous year. The trend of customers increasingly preferring to rent licenses on a fixed term basis rather than purchasing licenses with perpetual right of use continued as before. And the group, we are a growth platform from entrepreneurs. It means that we acquire and support entrepreneurial companies in their efforts to become even better. So far, we have completed six acquisitions in 2024, and we continue to see many opportunities for further acquisitions. In PLM, we have made an acquisition this quarter. It's Prime Aerostructure. It's leading the solar system partner base in Austria. and a simulation leader in the aerospace engineering industry. The company has about 10 employees and net sales of approximately 45 million. It's a bolt on acquisition to Technia and will be consolidated in Q3. Division process management. In the second quarter, net sales increased by 5% to 335 million. Adjustable currency effect organic growth was 4%. EBITDA amounted to 59 million, and the margin was 17.6%. Municipalities and public authorities show continued restraint in terms of investment in major projects, meaning less tenders out there. And they were in queue to then previous years. But sales remain stable. That has to do with the division's good and well-established relationships with a large public sector customer base that present frequently opportunities for recurring sales and expansion of current assignments. The division's business are well-positioned in public sector tenors, owing to their attractive digital solutions, in-depth experience and good references. We have made two acquisitions to division management this quarter. The first one is GPS Timber. It's a software for timber yard logistics, supporting management of raw materials as sawmills and pulp mills. It has installation in over 40 industry facilities around Europe. It's a net sales of around 8 million. We have previously owned 50% of the product and now we have bought the last 50% of the So it means that we are the main owner of that now going forward. We also made another acquisition to the division. It's a company called Adoceo. Its software is used to manage cases related to transportation of people with mobility or cognitive difficulties. It has a net sales of roughly 50 million and it will become part of the company Stanford in the division. And this will also be part of the Q3 results going forward. The two good examples of it can expand our software portfolio in the division. So with that, as an introduction to the outcome of the divisions, I would like to hand over to our CFO, who will walk you through cash flow and financial position.

Yes, thank you very much, Johan. And I'm going to take you through this way that I'm going to start with a quarter and then move on to the accumulated six months year to date to June. So we'll start with the cash flow from operating activities. And you can see that there was an increase of 51 million SEK to 178 million in cash flow from operating activities. And that increase is mainly relating to the operating profit that increased by 40. And also good work in changes in working capital that you can see also 51 million. If you look at the six months period, we generated 559 million SEK in operating cash flow. And this was 163 million above last year of 396. And the main reason for the increase relating to the operating profit that you can see of 78 and also a good improvement in changes in working capital of 130 million SEK. Going down the rows down to investment activities, we can see that investment activities amounted to 64 minus. And that is mainly relating to our investment in our own proprietary products, capitalized development costs, and also acquisition of external software that we talked about just now. Going down to the right, you can see for the six months, We had cash flow from investment activities of 206 million SEK, and that included the acquisitions that we made and concluded in Q1. And also consideration for sellers for acquisitions that were made previous years, that's earn out payments. So that half of the 206 are relating to the investment and the earn outs. And the rest, the remaining, 105 in real numbers relating to investment in our own software and also acquired software and other tangible fixed assets. And then the last line on the cash flow is from financing activities. You can see that financing activities for the quarter amounted to 301 million SEK. And that was relating to the dividend that we paid now in May of 133 million SEK. And we also made a repayment of loan in foreign currency of 143 million SEK. And also a smaller amount relating to IFRS 60 in the leasing of 25 million SEK. And then looking at the six months period, The financing activity is 282, apart from what I just said for the quarter, the dividend and the repayment. We also increased borrowings in foreign currency regarding acquisitions in Q1. So that was the cash flow part. And then I'm also going to speak a little bit about the balance sheet, and I would like to you to pay attention. This is the operating balance sheet and it's not the balance sheet that you can read from the report, but we think this is a good way to present the financial position of the company. So you can see that we continue to operate supported by a resilient balance sheet. That's an important foundation for our continued growth, both organically and through acquisitions. And the main changes in the balance sheet during 2024 are mainly driven from the acquisitions we have made so far, increases in goodwill and other intangible assets, or mainly relating to the acquisition of which Optimec was the largest impact. There's also translation difference that had effect on intangible assets. And then we can see that our business model enable us to operate with a negative networking capital. And you can see that representing an amount of minus 783 million SEK. And going down the line, we have a line for provision taxes and other debts of 732 million. And that includes the majority in that is relating to earnouts. and other liabilities to sellers of companies. And that in total amounted to 583 million SEK. And the majority of that, about 85%, is related to the US acquisitions of Microdesk, now SymmetryUS, and D3. Next line is the net debt, 825. And you can see that that was a decrease from December 31st, 2023 by 174 million. And it's partly due to or mainly due to the strong cash flow from operations. We have a cash position of 770 million SEK. That is a net increase of about 100 million from December 2023. And we have total facilities of 2.6 billion, and approximately 1.1 billion of those are unutilized as of 30th of June 2024. And then I would like to hand back to Johan to talk about ADNOs as an investment.

Thank you, Kristina. Just to sum it up where we are, ADNO Group, we are all about digitalization for a better society. Long-term, we can see that the demand for the digital solutions offered by our companies extends beyond and across economic cycles, driven both by customer needs, such as digitalization, automation, urbanization, and sustainability. Our strategy is to, with a sound risk-taking, capitalize on these trends by continuously acquiring new businesses and actively supporting our subsidiaries to generate sustainable value growth and drive organic earnings growth. So far, we have completed six acquisitions in 2024, and I continue to see many opportunities for acquisitions this year. We have a business model with a high portion of recurring revenue, usually prepaid, given a solid cash generation, as Christina earlier described. We do have an uncertain economic situation, but believe that the money in most of Anna Group's markets is stable. The strength and capability of our companies to deliver digital solutions for sustainable society, our healthy financial position and our acquisition capacity will continue to provide a solid foundation for continued value creation. So without any introduction to Q2, let's go to Q&A.

If you wish to ask a question, please dial 5 on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial 6 on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Eric Larson from SEB. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I have a few questions. First off, on PLM and the weakness here, we saw the salt profit warning the other day, so it's not completely unexpected. And they said that customers are still there, but they remain cautious. So my question is, do you expect this dynamic to remain throughout 2024?

Thank you for the question. We can see the same dynamic. And you can also see, like we described, that we have a dynamic where customers, instead of rather go for the old perpetual licenses, they go for a rental model. So that also affects our top line growth. It could be that we have the similar business, but instead it's going for a rental model, meaning that we are increasing our recurring revenue rather than the top line growth. We have that as well. So that's a long-term trend that's there. But we can also see that the customers in predominantly like we wrote in the report in the automotive industry, they are postponing bigger deals. So we are selling less licenses, but we are working with our customer implementation integration with their activities. So the short answer is yes, we can see the same trend. I guess the proof of the budding will come in the second part of the year here when we are coming close to Q4 and that They will do it. But we see the same trend.

Yeah. And the follow up there would be if there are any additional cost initiatives here or if the situation differs a bit from last year when you made some restructuring.

No, we don't see any sort of big things that we need to do. We have doubled the margin compared to last year. We are more efficient in our products. And we can see that we can do a healthy margin on the business, even though we don't have top line growth. So that means that we are in much more better conditions here. You can also see, if you look at the number of employees, even though we have done acquisitions, it's less employees in PLM now than compared to last year. So I think we, I don't expect us to do any bigger sort of reductions in this.

Okay, great. And then on process, management where margins were a bit soft. I'm just curious if there weren't anything specific here and if there are any reasons why we should not expect you to be in around the 19% margin you have been at for the last five quarters or so going forward.

No, there are no specific reasons. What can happen sometimes is that we can have a mix of more consulting, more licenses or something that can have an effect. There's no reason why we shouldn't be able to produce that. Sometimes we can have a quarter that we wander and some that we overperform. I don't think that long term we should, but don't expect us to go above the trend as well.

Okay, I understand. And then a final question on earnouts. If you could just remind us How much earn out do you expect to pay in 2024 and 2025, if you could?

Yes, yes. We will pay for one smaller part for the microdesk acquisitions in 2024. And the majority will lie within 2025 and 2026 for the acquisitions in the US.

Okay. And Team D3, is that also for 2025-2026?

Team D3 is mainly in 2026.

Okay, perfect. Thank you. That's all from me. I'll get back in the queue.

Thank you, Erik.

The next question comes from Fredrik Nilsson from Red Eye. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Hi, Johan and Kristina. I want to start in design management. I know there's an impact from Team D3, but considering the very strong organic growth, I would have expected a slightly higher margin. Am I missing something here?

I think if you have to look at that, what happens is that it depends also what kind of product mix that we are growing with. Predominantly, the growth is coming from that we are selling more Autodesk products. It means that both that we are bringing in Team D3, who have sort of compared to the division prior to the acquisition of Team D3, they have a higher portion in their product mix of Autodesk products. And then sometimes between the quarter, there could be an effect of the profit margin on those deals that could have an effect. I think it's predominantly those two reasons why we are having a lower gross profit margin this year. So it's not a... I think we are in line with our OPEX. And I think the difference that you probably need to look at is the... profit in this quarter. It's not saying that we believe that this is a trend that we'll have going forward. It's just the thing in the quarter.

Okay. Makes sense. And also, the gross margin in PLM, not just for a quarter, but in general, is higher than in design management. I would have expected the opposite, considering you have some proprietary software in design management.

Yes, we have proprietary products in both. The difference with design and PLM is that PLM has more services. Because they are working more with the product data management system, the PLM system. And those are integrated with other systems and integrated. And on the services, we have a gross profit of probably around 85 or 90%, because we have some sub-suppliers. So that means that will drive up the gross profit compared to design, who have more mix with more third-party products. So both have a healthy part of own prepared products, but what differs between design and PLM is that PLM has more consultancy services on the things that we deliver.

Okay, I see. And lastly, the declining trend in organic growth rate turned this quarter in process management. I know there's one more working day, but Do you see that the willingness to invest is improving somewhat, at least in the public sector, in your view?

I think there are still some sort of, it's not, the tenders are not really there where we would like to be. There are tenders out there. We are doing work. We have a healthy sort of, we have enough to do. But most of the work is upsell or working with existing customers. So I don't think it's a big trend saying that we'll go to 5, 6, 7. I think if we continue at 5, then that would be good for the rest of the year if we can do that. Because this year, compared to last year, we have less index increases in our maintenance agreements in the process. So that means that the organic growth will either have to come from volume or that we are able to increase prices in new projects.

Okay, that's all from me. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Greg.

The next question comes from Daniel Thorsen from ABG Sundal Collier. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi. A quick question here on the sign. Do you have the organic gross profit growth figure in Q2 in the sign? I guess it was a bit lower than the sales.

We don't have that. And we are not in a position to display that. But I think one of the previous questions was that what we can see is that if we would, we can see that the gross profit margin is a little bit below our historical level this quarter. So that means that you can do your own math and see that we are probably lower on organic growth in gross profit than on top.

No, absolutely. I agree. I was just a bit curious around what level it was at. But I agree. And then a related question about the US AEC market. We saw the latest US ABI index coming quite soft. I think it was for May. And you said that Q1 could have seen somewhat pre-selling health ahead of the new transaction model. Did you see that in Q2 as well, which means that it could be kind of a setback over the summer months or what's the current trending or trading in the market currently?

No, we haven't. Yes, your question is that the first the market is still like you see it could be better, but we're able to do business in the US market that we are doing better than last year. And we're also doing services with our customers. And then with regards to an effect from the BIS transaction model, yes, there have been some activities, but most of the contracts that were sent to the new transaction model, yes, there are some boasts, but not that much, I would say. That's not sort of the driver this quarter. It's more of a catch-up compared to last year.

Yeah. That's excellent. And then also regarding the new transaction model you mentioned here, verbal in the presentation, it was around 10 million or so in Q2, and we understood that there shouldn't be any effect as agreements will be started off after summer, for example, and sales were 1.2 billion. Is it possible to give any kind of indication of this level going into Q3 and also some thinking about this level into Q4 now when we know that Europe's going to go active in September? Is this going to be like a couple of hundred million SEC in Q3 or what's kind of the ranges you're thinking of?

If we're looking at, I think if we separate the question in two, in one US and one Europe, what we'll have is a situation for US that in Q3, you will probably have a mix of the old and new transaction models in our books. And then in Q4, it will probably be the according to the new transaction model. And then if you look at Europe, you will have a mix in the third quarter, and then it will be probably the new model in Q1. So going from 2025 and forward, it will probably be according to the new model. That's our best guess. And having said that, knowing how much we sell in the US and how we sell in Europe, So in Q3, you will probably see in the hundreds in the US. It needs to be that in order to follow that trend. And then you will see the same effect in Europe as we roll forward. So Q3 and Q4 will be sort of the quarter of change. And then in Q1-Q2. we believe that we will have one of the slides that will show how we will trend with regards to profit margins and etc. will be significantly different from 2025 going forward.

Yeah, true. And then I'm a little bit curious about the Nordic public market here as well. How are you trending on price increases versus salary inflation at the moment?

I think we're in a good position. We are able to sort of look at... Here in the Nordics and Sweden, we tend to have a good understanding that it's not that good to drive inflation on salaries because then it will have a different effect. So I think we are able to handle that. So we don't see that as a problem looking at salary inflation compared to prices. And then with regards to the market, there are businesses out there. We are doing some really good and there are some pockets where we have a really good business drive, for example, we are doing business with regards to those dispensations to hospitals with regards to pills and et cetera, and pharmacies, et cetera. So there are pockets of growth. And so I think we don't expect to have that high growth, but there are businesses there. So I don't know if that answers your questions, but...

Yeah, no, it's good to hear that you have a balance between price increases and salaries because I expect price increases to be less ahead. And in new projects, maybe there could be some prices actually down year over year, etc. So if you can balance it with low salary inflation, that's obviously good. And then finally, have you seen any increased activity around Autodesk reselling partners or companies in terms of

M&A activity are they trying to sell themselves to you or are you seeing any competitors trying to consolidate the market at the faster speed than before any changes in the M&A space in design I think the consolidation is there of the market definitely and we can see that's continuing and we are a couple of players a couple of companies consolidating market and those are the the same one and they have different names so i think the activity is definitely there and we want to be part of it as well and so we are definitely part of that and the constellation is ongoing are there any big sort of changes in the pace no i wouldn't say that so but it has been ongoing the last five years yeah i see and you haven't got like

significantly larger amount of inbounds from companies that would like to sell themselves because they see a tougher environment due to the new transaction model with Autodesk.

Nothing like that. No, I wouldn't say that. That is sort of a long significant. I would rather say that it's something that has been ongoing for a long time, the consolidation of the channel. And we are part of it and we would like to be part of it.

I see. Excellent. That's all. Have a great summer.

Thank you. Thank you for that, Daniel. Any more questions?

There are no more questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.

Great. Thank you all for taking the time to listen in and some great questions. Christina and I are of course available if you have any questions. You will find our details on our website or do get in contact.