This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
7/23/2024
Again, welcome to the Devisee Q2 2024 earnings call. It's a great pleasure to have you all here. This is the first time we published our Q2 result in July, earlier end of August, and that's something I'm very proud of. Today, you will listen to me, Fredrik Alkstein, the Devisee's CEO, and Thijs Kipling, our chief commercial officer and responsible for business development. I have also asked our CFO, Sabina Berlin, to join us during the Q&A session. A lot of positive things are happening in the company. Those of you who follow us more closely may have seen a record number of positive press releases during the quarter. The sales from boom tenders etc. informed about in these published press releases are not yet reflected in the Q2 numbers. We'll see that later. Today we embark on a journey to our Q2 results. The second part of the presentation will be dedicated to highlighting the key achievements from the portal and discussing our commercial outcomes. Sales developed very well during the quarter and amounted to 53.2 million SEK, a new record. The earlier record from last year was 50.7 million. Sales growth compared with the same quarter last year was 41% in SEK and plus 40% in local currency. All growth is organic. The growth of plus 40% in local currency is the highest growth we have seen for one single quarter since the company was listed. The growth for the first six months of 2024 was 35% in SEC and 34% in local currency. The growth for the last 12 months was 38%. With our innovative products, high market growth, well-suited commercial organizations that we have heavily invested in over the last quarters, and some of the best commercial partners. We are confident that our current positive sales trend will not only continue, but also strengthen. While we may face individual quarters that have not performed as well, the overall trend is clear. Our sales are on a significant upward trajectory, with most quarters expected to be record-breaking. Even with the impressive sales growth we have achieved in the first six months, we are confident that we can maintain this level of growth in the second half of the year, achieving at least the same growth in local courtesy as we did in the first half of the year. It's always dangerous to look at single quarters and draw too many conclusions from them. As single orders can heavily affect the quarter, it's much better to examine rolling 12-month periods. EMEA grew by 32% compared with the previous 12 months. During the quarter, we saw high sales growth in the Middle East and the European distributed markets, even if we are not fully satisfied with the development of the direct sales markets in Europe. Asia-Pacific grew by 26% compared with the previous 12 months. Q2 grew by 75% compared with the same quarter last year. During the last 12 to 18 months, we have signed up quite a few new distributors in Asia, and some of them have now started to generate revenue. The growth in North and South America was plus 166% compared with the previous 12 months. We are very optimistic about North America and see the flat development during the last quarter as a result of an uneven purchasing patterns from one of our distributors. And please remember that we do not yet have that many customers in North America. The potential in North America is massive and we have just started to penetrate this huge market. North America will be one of our top priorities, both for the near, mid and long term. Our direct sales represented about 75% and our distributed sales represented about 25% of total revenue, both for the quarter and for the last 12 months. However, as sales through term of issue are increasing, and new distributors in regions like Asia and the Middle East are added, we may see an increased distributed share of revenue. One of Devizor's strengths is its business model. We have very high gross margins because we only sell consumables and software, new equipment. Since I joined Devizor in the fall of 2020, we have managed to increase the gross margin from around 75% to around 85%. The reason is a scalable production process, even if it up to now has been rather manual, and our ability to increase prices. However, as we had grown out of our production facility, we decided spring 2023 to move to a bigger facility to enable higher production volumes and automate production processes. We have signed a seven year lease with an option for another four years. With one shift in production, we can stay here even if we have a growth of in average 50% per year. We got access to the new facility in January this year and moved our offices to the new facility in February. During the spring, we have worked extensively to build up the production and R&D part of the facility. As with all certified and regulated business, this must be done by the book, documented, validated and verified. It must be approved by the regulatory authorities and notified bodies when ready. The regulatory authorities have now approved the new production facility and we can move production and R&D labs from the old facility to the new one during Q3. All work to finalize the new facility has been costly. Cost of goods sold was negatively impacted by 3 million sick during the quarter. We also had a negative impact. We also expect a negative impact during the third quarter, but we expect to be back on track by the end of Q4 this year. And that's a gross money in excess of 80%. This investment will help us to drive down production costs even further and help us continue automating the production processes and accordingly increase our gross margins in the long run. It should also be mentioned that to minimize risk, we decided to rent both facilities, the new one and the old one, during the full year of 2024. This means that when we go into 2025, we will not pay rent for the old facility. The quarter's EBIT was in line with our expectations. It amounted to minus 23 million SEK compared with minus 14 million SEK in the same quarter last year. A couple of one-time items caused a low result. The move to the new premises, as explained earlier, was 3 million extra during the quarter. Double rent for new and old premises. We have added 3 million SEK in additional rent costs per quarter during 2024. We had also increased costs for our expansion in North America, including, among other things, work to get the best possible compensation for our products in our clear lab, as well as work on setting up our own warehouse in the US. In total, another 3 million SEK. The positive development of the device's share price also meant that during the quarter we were hit by higher costs for our incentive programs. The total cost for incentive programs, etc., amounted to 2 million SEK during the quarter. It should also be noted that during the second quarter of 2023, we brought back a provision of 2 million SEK for a so-called retroactive payback fee. We are convinced that the positive earnings development we saw in 2023 will continue and that we will reach our financial goal of an EBIT margin exceeding 20% from 2024 to 2026. Devisa has a very strong financial position, 201 million SEK in cash at the end of the quarter and no interest bearing debts. During the quarter, an employee warranty program expired and the options were exercised. It meant a capital injection of some 17 million for the company at the end of the quarter. With that, I'll leave over to Thijs to give some highlights from the quarter and a commercial outlook.
Thank you, Fredrik. Indeed, Q2 was a record quarter, and I'm happy to take you through some of the updates and the outlook to give the gist and the understanding that, in fact, we're just getting started. On June 17th, if you move to the next slide, we announced that we have expanded the agreement with Thermo Fisher to now cover global territory. The reason we didn't provide Thermo Fisher with access to global territory for our transportation products already a year ago, when we first signed the agreement with them, was due to the fact that we wanted to be reassured that customers responded well to the collaboration, as well as we wanted to be confirmed about the investments and the dedication made by Thermo Fisher. This we have now seen, and hence we gladly are now working with them on building a significant success globally. Our products have long been advocated for by key opinion leaders. But now we're seeing laboratories who start bringing in these products in their clinical routine across both Europe and North America. And thus we are confident that the momentum will only propel further once we get users across Asia Pacific on board as well. Allowing Thermo Fisher access to global territory is attractive for the revenue growth of the visor since we can now expand the market reach by an extra 43% measured on the number of kidney transplantation in the Asia Pacific region. Together with Thermo Fisher, we are addressing a more than 1 billion US dollar market and have already made a lot of headway together establishing new standards within the market using the divisor one lambda post-transplantation products we have already reached the first ibdr approvals for both our assays and software we are pursuing fda approval in the us and we are on solid path towards also having our tests reimbursed in our clear certified laboratory you can move to the next slide please Beyond the revenue logic related to the global partnership, it equally much helps with cost synergies, since we no longer need to maintain a divisor-only product line for the transportation products, including taking them through regulatory approvals, et cetera. These efforts will now be focused on the divisor and Thermo Fisher co-branded product line only. Hence, truly a sound business logic and business decision as we now look into year two and onwards together with Thermo Fisher we're intrigued by the opportunities ahead not least on the product pipeline front where we have several new and potentially groundbreaking product launches coming up while these products are not automatically included in the master agreement that we have with Thermo Fisher we do believe that these products will significantly enhance both Thermo Fisher's and our position within the transportation area for the years to come. Let's move into Italy. During Q2, we closed deals worth 84 million Swedish kronor in Italy, including an all-time high tender covering the region of Tuscany. We continued expansion of our oncology business, as well as we won yet another deal for our Thalassemia product. If you add the announcement that we did late last week, that number is close to 90 million Swedish kronor in the past three to four months. Italy remains our largest market, and I'm thrilled to see how the team continues to take market share and to expand our business. Looking ahead, I'm excited to see that we still have a large number of opportunities to further accelerate this momentum. I'm sure that a lot more will come. Focusing on thalassemia. Thalassemia is one of the most prevalent hereditary diseases in the world. The market is therefore huge and at Devizor, we're well positioned with our products. which grew almost 60% during first half of this year versus same period of last year. And now is about 10% of our total sales. We're pursuing a large number of opportunities in markets where thalassemia prevalence is high, such as Italy, Spain, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, India, Singapore, and I could go on. Recently, our thalassemia test was chosen for state screening program in California, the US. And we are pursuing other similar state programs within the US as well. Lastly, I can share that we are in dialogue with large pharmaceutical companies who have expressed interest in the product as well. And I will soon come back sharing more information about these potential engagements in the months ahead of us. Another interesting product is our RSD test, where we have seen lots of strong traction. We continue to expand our market position, and we just signed up with another leading laboratory in Canada, in addition to Hema Quebec, which we already have announced. In addition, we announced in December that our RSD test was chosen for nationwide screening in Wales, which is just yet another country to the list where our RSD test is chosen for either state, region, or nationwide screening. One of the markets yet to be penetrated with RG testing in the US, where the market standard is still the prophylactic injection for pregnant women. However, just recently, the prophylactic drug Rogam came into shortage by the suppliers. And thus, we now are seeing a very heavy intake of requests for testing. in the US. I have early on been very bullish about our market opportunity for this product in the US. And now, especially once the market turns towards testing before injection, I am even more bullish with this potential. These days, we're in dialogue with some of the largest laboratory chains and laboratories in the US around RFC test and i'm hopeful that one or several of these opportunities will land during this year and i'm excited to be communicating soon about this. let's move into the next update regarding you know what is what does the future hold with regards to thermal picture we now one year in and we're already seeing strong growth and currently are up some 65% above. H2 2023. With lead times, as we have talked about before, being 12 to 18 months, we're just in the beginning of the growth journey with Thermo Fisher. And we're confident that this will accelerate in the month and the years to come. We're adding three new indications, heart, liver and lung. We're pursuing FDA clearance and launching new products that will be groundbreaking in the care of transplantation patients globally. The additional three indications, as mentioned before, will expand our addressable market and measure on the total number of transplantations done globally. This is an exciting time in the field of transplantation, and I'm absolutely sure about Devizor becoming a key player for many years within this exciting area. Looking at what's next in the US, We continue to pursue the opportunities within testing for cystic fibrosis following the updated guidelines from last year. Our first customer is soon reaching clinical routine, and more opportunities are already in the pipeline. RHD, as mentioned, looks very promising, and I'm confident that this will be a great product for the US market in the years to come. And alongside gaining traction in Canada, this product has the potential to become one of our best selling products in the company. In the US, 15% of the population are ARG-negative, meaning that across the 3.7 million new births annually, there's a patient population of 550,000 patients annually who should be tested for their fetal status, which is a very attractive opportunity for the advisor now with the vacant interest in ARG-D testing rather than defaulting to the prophylactic treatment. Devices Genomic Laboratories, which is our CLIA-certified laboratory in Atlanta, is doing well. We are on track towards having our first products being reimbursed and covered, as well as our engagement with the UK-based oncology company Cyted are moving along well, and the laboratory are fulfilling the objectives as a growth catalyst for Devices in the US. Within just a few years, I'm confident that our North American business will be the largest region that we have in the company, even bigger and ahead of our otherwise large and strongly performing market that we have in Italy. With that, I hand it back to you, Fredrik.
Thank you, Thijs. As you know, over the last two years, we have taken some very important steps to build a global, fast-growing, highly profitable diagnostic company. As you also have heard, we are very optimistic about the future. We are focusing on North America and Europe. It's done via all our sales channels, direct sales, partners, via our CLIA lab, and via distributors. With our innovative products, a high market growth, a well-suited commercial organization that we have heavily invested in over the last quarters, and some of the best commercial partners, we are confident that the historical development we have seen can continue and even enhance. However, as important as high growth is to continue our way to profitability. It's our main focus.
with that we stop here now and open up for for for questions back to the operator if you wish to ask a question please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue if you wish to withdraw your question please dial pound key six on your telephone keypad The next question comes from Ulrich Trattner from Carnegie. Please go ahead.
Thank you very much and good morning. Good morning. I have a few questions on my end. First of all, very thankful for the split in one-off, but perhaps if you can comment on how these one-offs have developed since Q1. I know that OPEX has increased close to 10 million, and it looks, at least in reported number, to be mainly in admin and R&D. So if you can just help us understand that dynamic, how much is related to increased one-offs and what to extrapolate and what not to extrapolate into the second half of the year. That would be my first question, please.
Yeah, without giving too much details, because I'm not aware of them exactly, but I think it's important to remember a couple of things. The setup of the new production facility, the cost for that and the move that has affected the cost of goods sold by 3 million during Q2. The extra cost we have for having two facilities, The extra cost for those facilities, that's taken as an administrative cost, not affecting cost of goods sold. So that's one of the reasons why admin costs have increased quite much. And then we talked about the nice share price development we have seen. That's quite much also on the administrative costs. When it comes to the R&D costs, You know, you have both capitalized and non-capitalized R&D expenses. And we have maybe have capitalized slightly less during the quarter due to accounting reasons. So I'm quite sure that if you take both capitalized and non-capitalized costs, they have not increased that much compared with Q2. I think we'll be back on track for how much we capitalize in Q3 and Q4. Does it answer your question?
Yes, it does. Thank you. And really strong sales development across the board. And you touched upon the size and you talk about expected continued sales development for Thermo Fisher into the second half of the year. And I know that you have commented historically and continue to comment on the lead time of 12 to 18 months in regards to the tender activity. But in terms of the actual tender activity, have you seen any type of acceleration or interest in your Accept portfolio? And a follow-up question would be, you mentioned now that you're ready to commercially launch the expanded Accept portfolio, are these already commercially available or when are you expecting first revenue to come into the company?
Thank you, Rik. Let's start with the first one. I mean, the traction that we're seeing is still in the early phase, I would say, because we are still only just a year in from the initial launch of Thermo Fisher. And still with that, I think we're reassured with the initial traction. What really reassures me is when you look into what is being published, what is the clinical research that are made out there. And that's pretty phenomenal, I'd say, talking to the opportunities that we have with our products. short answer or to make that short as possible. We're still in the early phase, but we are very confident and reassured by the initial traction in terms of revenues, customer interest, tenders that are being written. So very strong start, but and that should bode well for what the future should hold for us and Thermo Fisher together.
Great. Yes, a reminder there, Ulrik. Please remember that we signed the agreement with Thermo Fishery in the beginning of Q2, but they didn't launch until the end of Q3. So we are still in a quite early phase. We have not been with them for 12 months yet. They have not launched their products during 12 months. and as we said in the interim report we foresee revenue from the expanded territory starting from 2025 even though we have some ongoing discussion for some certain accounts in these countries but you should not expect too high revenue for the expanded in 2024 please wait for 2025. okay great the second question related to timing of when the expanded number of except tests were to be commercially available in the u.s
Yeah, so that, as I also commented, I think we are expecting to see most of the initial onset of that during 2025. And for that, obviously, there's a number of adoption aspects that are being made now with customers. But again, lots of great traction also on those new indications that are being made on customer sites today, especially in the US and Europe. There will be a lot of that that you'll read about and see during the remainder of the year, and that will kick off the revenues for 2025 on those new indications.
Okay, great. And obviously, Thermo Fisher collaboration expanded, both in terms of products and geography. But in general, it looks like your products have commercial traction in the US and you have a portfolio beyond the transplantation portfolio and you still only have three people in terms of your headcount in the US. Obviously, you have your CLIA lab, but would it make any sense in your view to expand the number of distributors selling your product portfolio in the market breaking it up by indication, cystic fibrosis or RHD screening, or would it make more sense for you to keep it in-house and just go for potentially more high-valued tenders?
Good question, Ulrik. It's something we're actively assessing day in, day out as these opportunities come by. We have been approached several times by some very significant potential partners and yet decided that we were better suited to deliver on these opportunities ourselves. That being said, we are constantly in dialogue with very attractive opportunities that could make us pivot a little bit. And obviously the reason we're only three currently in the field organization of the U.S. is because we are careful in terms of the investments and we are still very confident about the opportunities, right? So when those opportunities, they will turn, you'll see that we will be investing in an increased fashion in the U.S. But for the time being, we're confident with the level that we have versus the potential that are coming ahead of us.
Great. Some additional questions on the general commercial activities, but potentially we could keep our eyes on the US and on the CLIA lab. So internally in your CLIA lab, what's your current commercial traction? How are things progressing? And what type of revenues are you expecting prior to obtaining reimbursement in the US? And I heard throughout the call that you have
invested in people specializing in the matter of obtaining reimbursement so where are we at in that progress we're probably for the reimbursement if we if we just look at that the initial products that we have commercialized are the arts d test and now we are seeking reimbursement for our chimerism and our except cfdna so the two transplantation products and those two products are not covered by the Thermo Fisher Agreement, right? Those we have retained exclusive rights to be commercializing through and from our laboratory. And those are the efforts that we're now investing in in terms of getting those coverage and reimbursed in the US. Timelines can be a little bit fluffy, but we're hoping that early next year, you would see that we have those products covered and then we would see volumes quite quickly start to be generated. In addition to that, there's a number of opportunities for adding new products. And one of the products, the two products currently being worked on, and that's the test for cystic fibrosis, but also the test for thalassemia. And then there could naturally be additional products, but it could also be additional partnerships like the one we have with Cyted, as we disclosed, generating up to 25 million Swedish kronor just on that one opportunity. So it is meant to be a widespread and wide-focused catalyst for growth in the US and it's shown to be also.
Great and last question on my end and it would be kind of a follow-up question as well. If you could talk a little bit about phasing of revenue in the second half. We already talked about Thermo Fisher but if we can talk about the delivery of the already awarded RHD tender in Canada, as well as the sighted commercial contract. How should we look at this for the second half of the year?
Maybe I can say a couple of words there. It's always difficult to talk about single quarters because it can be delayed from the customer. What we said and what I said earlier is that we are rather confident that we can maintain the same growth during the second part of 2024 that we had during the first six months of 2024. And that's in local curves. And as you know, we had a growth of 34% for the first six months. So we are confident that we can maintain at least the same during the second part of the year. I prefer not to say something about single quarters because it can always be delays. But if you look at two quarters, it's easier to say things.
But you do expect some deliveries on the cited contract and as well as in the RHD screening awarded already in Canada during the second half of the year? Or is there risk that this will be pushed into 2025?
Maybe I can put it... I'm sorry, I'll do it, Tyson. So, you're right, Ulrik. The vast majority will happen in 2025, right? But that will also mean that we are starting to see the ramp up into volumes of revenues here during the second half. But the biggest chunk of that potential sits in 2025. With regards to RSD testing in Canada, uh that also is more of a 2025 opportunity as there have been some delays with him a quebec as we have already communicated but as i also mentioned in my walkthrough of the commercial update we actually just landed another account up there and i'm still waiting for some details before i can disclose much more but i wouldn't expect that that would have a great impact in 2024 but it's going to be building on our accumulation of growth in 2025 and beyond.
Great. That was all questions on my end. Thank you very much. Thank you.
The next question comes from Oscar Bergman from Redeye. Please go ahead.
Good morning, guys. Just a few questions to you. I was looking at the number of employees, and it has gone up quite a bit since Q2 of last year. So if you could just give some commentary on your organizational, well, I guess, increase.
Yeah, if you look one year back, of course, it has gone up quite heavily. But if you look at the Q1, it has not done that. We have invested in supply chain quite heavily because we are building up for a future growth. We have also invested quite heavily in our commercial organization. So that's the two main drivers, I would say. We have added some special competencies. We have already talked about reimbursement and market access in the US. So that's that kind of expertise that we have hired. We do not, however, expect to have any substantially more hires during the remaining of the year. Okay.
And could you just give an update on the CLIA lab in terms of it running on a profit?
No, it's not yet running on a profit. I think we shared at the last earnings call that we expect positive numbers during the second part of the year. And we already started that part Yes, it's still run with a loss, but it's not a huge loss. We have four, five people in the lab, and we have now started to work to both with Cited, but also the other things that we have disclosed here. We have some more discussions. The other ones, they have not started to generate revenue yet, but we are optimistic that they will do that during this year. We will remain with what we said earlier, positive during the second part of the year.
All right, thanks. And my next question is a bit speculative, and I guess you can't really tell so far. But despite the deal, do you stand a good chance of it being renewed? And if it could be renewed, should we expect similar sales figures going forward, or could it even be greater?
Maybe it's a question to you, Thijs, but please also remember, we cannot always disclose what has been discussed between a partner and us. But maybe you can give some more color here, Thijs.
Yeah, I mean, right now the agreement covers two years, right, so 2024-2025. I see no reason for why it couldn't be extended. I'm back in the States in mid-August, both in California, but also in the lab, and we're together with Cytos in the lab. But it's too early to be communicating more than just that. But it's moving along well. I mean, both parties are very happy with the engagement.
Okay. And just a final question then on the thermal fissure deal. I mean, I understand the lead time of 12 to 18 months since the initial signing before we can see any considerable sales developments. But apart from this, are there any other bottlenecks that we should be aware of that could hinder sales from growing?
From my side, I think that's the natural lead time, which is what we're in. But beyond that, what really excites me about this opportunity is that we're also changing the care of which transplant patients are looked after. And here is basically how we can protect the organ from being rejected. So we're also working on building up a lot of evidence for why monitoring is important. And that also takes some time. But if you call upon some of the key opinion leaders, you will hear that what we have going currently is very, very exciting and could be game-changing in the way of caring for transplant patients. So that's why we are super excited about what's to come and we're very confident that it will come. It just takes the natural time. This doesn't happen overnight.
Okay, thanks. Yeah, I think that's all for me.
Thank you, Oskar.
The next question comes from Ludvig Lundgren from Nordia. Please go ahead.
Hi Fredrik and Dice. So on the EME countries, we're currently establishing direct sales channels, such as in Germany, Spain and France. How has the development been here? Have the dynamic been similar to when you established direct sales in Italy?
Did I cover that one, Fredrik? Yeah, please, please. Yeah, I mean, yes, in general, it replicates. So you heard me say before in some of the earlier calls that When I take the growth curve from when we initially started going direct in Italy with what we're doing in the dark region, Benelux, UK and so forth, the curve of growth looks the same. That being said, as we also had written in the report, we had expected more growth in the direct markets of Europe. um but uh again very reassured that this will this will uh absolutely come uh so we're posting some 30 uh 34 believe in in the direct markets and obviously we're expecting plus 50 some of those markets we want to see doubling um so um but uh we're working on on on getting there but again when i look at what we have done in the larger markets like the dark region and the benedicts and so forth it looks very very Solid and now we're doing the same friends. We're doing the same Spain doing the same UK, which is a little bit later on that growth curve that we are working on. So we will, I'm confident these markets will also be replicating what we have done in Italy.
All right, great, thanks. So when you switch to this direct sales, you get this price effect, right? But would you say that this typically is also driving volumes? Like, have you seen that also in these new markets that volumes increase when you establish direct sales channels?
Yeah, usually that should happen, right? The initial effect is obviously on the price side where you convert from a distributor to a direct sales. That has an incremental value effect. And then as you get closer to customers, you build a relationship, you're closer in tenders, then volumes are also coming, which we also confirming when we look into our numbers.
All right, great. And then just a final one on the interest from pharmaceutical companies that you mentioned on the thalassemia test. Is a potential outcome from this that the test could be used as a companion diagnostics or are there other use cases for the tests?
That's too early to comment, but that I would encourage you to look into because that market, the companies that are working within sickle cell disease and working with thalassemia, it's very, very interesting. And we have one of the best products out there, I'm confident. So I think we are very well suited actually to partner and be a strong partner to pharmaceutical companies.
All right, great. Sounds exciting. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you.
As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad. There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions and closing comments.
In these earnings calls, even if it's holiday times for most people in Scandinavia at least, I hope you will have a nice holiday and let's get in touch later in the fall when we have our third earnings call for this year. Thank you.