Embracer Group AB (publ)

2024 2025 presentation. My name is Martin Annel and I'm an equity analyst with the in the markets in Stockholm. I'm here to moderate the Q&A presentation and introduce management today. If you are in the room, please if you want to ask a question during the Q&A raise your hand. And those of you in the stream you can ask questions there as well in the in the formula and you can also ask questions at the conference call of course. And with that I want to hand over to CEO and President Lars Wingenfors.

Thank you Martin and welcome everyone to this morning in Stockholm. I will take you through our performance in the second quarter followed by a deeper information about the easy brain transaction announced this morning. So in the quarter we achieved 8.5 billion of net sales which is a decline year over year and an adjusted EBIT of 1.2 billion. The difference between this year and last year is all made up of the two significant releases of remnant and payday we had in the previous year. The free cash flow came in a bit negative at minus 500 million due to increased working capital because of inventory buildup. On a trailing 12 month basis our free cash flow amounts to 1.2 billion. So looking at the highlights I'm happy to report that as MoD had a real solid earnings growth year over year. They go from strength to strength which I'm very glad for ahead of their listing and their capital market day next week. We will soon meet Thomas here, the CEO, on stage. The probability within as MoD were 700 million in the quarter. Moving to PC console we had a softer performance. However, we do expect an improved performance in the second half of the year over the first half. The softer performance is due to some weaker ROI on release products connected especially with delays of game releases in the second half of the year. And there is still expectation of some release delays but it's not yet decided because we're trying to optimize release windows in what looks to be a very busy industry quarter in the first calendar quarter next year ending March. We are however looking through as an ongoing basis as always our efficiency and our costs but because of the weaker ROI and delays of our releases we need to increase our look through of our fixed cost base ahead of the spin-offs next year. However, talking about delays I would like to be clear that there is no delays expected on our most important release Kingdom Come 2 deliverance that are expected in February next year. And obviously this morning's transaction of the divestment of eSbrain is transformative for us and I will come back to that in the end of the presentation. So looking at the segments now looking at PC console the organic growth was minus 43 percent. We expected negative organic growth because again of the lack of any notable releases. The probability came in at 8 percent or 175 million and partly the adjusted EBIT margin is impacted by low ROI of a number of releases in the past two years. The most notable release in the quarter, Disney Epic Mickey did okay but didn't live up fully to the expectations of the management. However, we do believe that that title and we could see that already has a good performance in this current quarter ending December. We also finally had a final release of Satisfactory that exceeded our expectations and we had more than 200,000 concurrent players on PC during the full game launch on PC. We now looking forward to the release on consoles ahead of us. Other releases were Monster Jam Showdown and a smaller title that performed a bit better than expected. Nobody wants to die. Look on the catalog sales. You could recognize many IPs that always are on the top chart. Remnant, Dead Island, Star Trek, Kingdom Come Deliverance, Deep Rock Galactic, Blocksburg, Goat Simulator, Neverwinter Nights. I have to point out I'm glad to see Payday coming back on the top list and I'm even more glad to see MX versus ATV actually coming back on the top performing catalog titles. Well done. Looking on the return of investment slide. Used to be a favorite slide a few years ago. Looks a bit more depressing this morning. However, I'm confident about the future. But again, we had a number of small and mid-sized releases that are underperforming and that are under one in return of investment that is not acceptable. The average still stands on 2.1. And Epic Mickey and Monster Jam are still below one in the first quarter, but we expect them to get back above one soon. Looking on investment and completed game development. In the quarter, we completed games of the book value of 455 million in the quarter. Epic Mickey, for example, was a sizable investment. However, we still invested a lot more into the future pipeline, 817 million in the quarter. The balance between these two would be more equal in the future. And I think we will see a difference or I know we will see a different ratio in the second half of the year, driven, for example, of the release of Kingdom Come Deliverance 2. I'm excited about the pipeline. And on this slide, you can see a number or a few of some notable titles upcoming. All in all, we have more than 120 games, projects in the pipeline. And obviously, the most of them is not announced yet. And many of them will drive profitability and cash flows going forward and are based on many of our most iconic IPs. But we can't talk about them today. I can't wait to talk about them in the future. But what we can talk about is obviously the announced titles and the confirmed release dates for titles on this slide is for the legacy of Kane Soul Reaver 1 and 2 remastered coming already in December. That is performing on pre-ordering basis much stronger than expectations so far. Again, we have Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 coming in February. The studio just announced that the first game has sold more than eight million copies since the release. And actually, it was a great contributor in the catalog in the second quarter. I'm confident about the quality and the release dates of that product. And Tomb Raider 4 to 6 remastered coming in February. We had a great success with the first remastered last financial year. And fans seem to be as excited about this one. On the other titles you see on this slide, there is not defined release dates. So the publishers will come back to fans and the market when they are ready. Moving to mobile games. Again, a strong quarter from a profit perspective. 1.3 billion revenues, but a good 28% adjusted EVIT margin. And even though we have seen a decline in daily active users over time, that decline is mainly driven by the change of business model again within Crazy Labs. So I think I'm trying to get some more time for Q&A because I've been hearing a lot of questions. So without further ado, I would welcome Thomas on stage to tell you more about Tabletop. Welcome. Thank you,

Lars. Good morning, everybody. In parallel of the spin off process that we obviously are working on very actively with Embracer, with our advisors, Asmodis management team obviously remains heavily focused on delivering the business. In Q2, I'm very happy to report that we deliver net sales of 3.8 billion SEC in line with our expectations. From a year on year perspective, reported net sales were slightly down by 6%, also impacted by the divestment of miniature market. On an organic and pro forma basis at constant currency, net sales were down 4% year on year. It's in line with management expectations and in line with the previous quarter. With growth in games published by Asmodi studios offset by a higher decrease in games published by our partners. I would like to highlight that we compared to a very strong quarter last year that at the same time saw a 15% organic growth on games published by our partners. On a profit level, the adjusted a bit margin continued to improve by 2% points versus the same quarter last year, pursuing the trend initiated in Q1. The improvement was driven by a more favorable product mix, as I did say, supported by an increased contribution from games published by our studios and the continued benefits of run rate savings of the group restructuring program. On the commercial side, key releases of the quarter included Altered, the innovative trading card game published by our partners at Equinox, but also Survive the Island, Fairy Ring, The Mandalorian Adventures, and Arkham Horror, the role playing game. Combined with the continued success of Star Wars Unlimited, who released its set two, Shadows of Galaxy, all of those published by Asmodi studios. Early sell-in of two very exciting titles, Lego Monkey Palace and The Lord of the Rings Duel for Middle Earth. Both games were officially hitting the stores in the first days of Q3, but we did have early sell-in to resellers towards the end of September. The game was very, very strong traction on the quarter. Both titles did create a significant enthusiasm at Spiel in Essen, that's our biggest consumer show, early October in Germany. It's one of the most prominent events in our industry, and during which we had 65,000 demos engaging 200,000 tabletop fans over the four days of the show. In Q3, alongside Monkey Palace and Lord of the Rings Duel for Middle Earth, most notable release is the highly expected Star Wars Unlimited, which will release its set three, Twilight of the First Republic. We continue, as we say, quarter after quarter, to deploy our multi-year strategy with product development that I did announce was finalized for the upcoming years already. And the names of sets four, five and six were released at Gen Con early August. We also look forward for the release of our second Lord of the Rings game, The Fellowship of the Ring, a trick-taking game that is expected to hit the shelves in Q4. On the media development side, we have some very exciting news. During the quarter, Netflix released Exploding Kittens TV show, the first Asmodai IP brought to the screen. And after the quarter, Netflix also released on October 23rd its well-rolls of Miller's Hollow movie adaptation in a family comedy called Famille Pac, or Loup Garou in French, available in 190 countries, subtitled in 35 languages. And the movie totaled over 30 million views to date and ranked number one non-English movie in over 25 countries in its first week. In October, also Canal Plus, the leading French pay TV station, aired its long-awaited comeback to TV game shows. Also, we were with Welles of Miller's Hollow and backed by an extensive marketing campaign. The show, only available in French, generated to date over 10 million views for its first eight episodes. And Canal Plus CEO has already announced that they validated season two and three. We can't wait for those. Overall, as management team, we're satisfied with the business performance in fiscal Q2. We're ramping up our operations towards the upcoming holiday season. In Q2, we also implemented our new governance. Our new board is in place. Our new executive management team is in place since end of August. And I have the chance, since the end of August, to have the great privilege of leading Asmodé as the new CEO. I'm also pleased to announce two new joiners to the team, to the extended leadership team, that both will be based out of Stockholm. On December 2nd, we will be welcoming Emma Heer, head of ESG and Nordics Public Affairs for Asmodé. Emma will bring wealth of experience and strategic insights from her recent position as head of sustainability at the Embracer Group and from her previous positions at Mienheimer Swartling and the Swedish Ministry of Finance. Emma will be reporting to me. And on January 6th, we will be welcoming Natalie Redmo, head of investor relations, also based out of Stockholm. She has a decade of experience in investor relations and finance, amongst which eight years with the Nasdaq Stockholm, including at Clouetta and Oriflame. Natalie will be established here, as I did say. She will lead our investor relations and will be reporting to Andrea Gasparini, our CFO. Finally, I'm very excited and looking forward to share more about Asmodé together with my management team on our upcoming Capital Markets Day. That will be held next Tuesday, November 19th here in Stockholm. That's it for a great quarter and a very exciting perspective for our tabletop segment. Back to you Lars.

Thank you, Thomas. Fantastic performance. Well done. So looking at our last segment, entertainment and services, largely as expected, the segment had a slower quarter with a few new releases. Organic growth was negative 9% year over year, with the 2% adjusted EBIT margin or 29 million. We are looking forward, as always, within this segment to the holiday quarter, which will be much more busy. And one key driver would be the cinematic release of the new The Lord of the Rings movie. And that would drive a lot of engagement and potentially some good royalties coming in the quarter. Beside the Middle Earth enterprises and the physical distribution business of video games, we have limited run games going from strength to strength in terms of quality content being released directly to consumers. And here on screen you can see two recent releases of Tomba Special Edition, one of my favorite games from the 90s, launched August 1st. Core physical business to a lot of fans, but also it will generate digital business. And in collaboration with our dear business partner of SEGA, they released Sonic Generations Collector's Edition during the quarter to a lot of excited fans. And here you can see the absolutely amazing Dreamcast thing in the middle. So with that bit of retro lines, I would like to welcome our CFO Mygge on stage to tell you more about the financial performance.

Thank you Lars. Good morning everyone. It's always a pleasure to be here. Let's look at an overview of our financial development. Net sales are 2.3 billion lower than last year, mainly driven by, as Lars mentioned, lower contribution from the new releases. And the tough yet expected comparator in PC console and entertainment and services. We also had the impact of our divestments of Sabre and Gearbox. The lower top line was partially mitigated by lower marketing expenses and operating expenses, and that reduced adjusted debit to 1.2 billion SEC. It is worth noting that the new releases last year, Remnant 2 and Payday 3, contributed 1.4 billion of net sales last year. This compares to 0.3 billion of the new releases this year, including Epic Mickey, Monster Jam and Satisfactory. The divestment of Sabre and Gearbox as well impacted the net sales by 0.7 billion last year, although with a very limited impact on the adjusted debit. These top line impacts in PC console and entertainment services led to a margin impact as well, where the gross margin percentage has deteriorated compared to last year. We do note that the overall marketing as a percentage of net sales remained stable at 10%. Marketing expenses outside the mobile segment are clearly lower compared to last year, with fewer larger releases. In mobile, we do continue to see less user acquisition costs compared to last year, but you'll see that it's higher than last quarter. Operating expenses decreased to 0.6 billion, of decrease to 2.1 billion, representing 24% of net sales, which is 1 point less than last year. Adjusted debit of 1.2 billion represents 14% of net sales, which is a decrease of 3 points compared to last year. The reduction is primarily due to the margin impact of our PC console and is primarily driven by the very big releases payday 3 and Remnant 2, which themselves contributed around 0.7 billion last year. This is the total cash flow for the quarter. Free cash flow amounted to minus 473 million in the quarter, which is a reduction of 860 million compared to last year. On a 12-month trailing basis, the free cash flow amounts to 1.2 billion SEK. Lower EBITDA and higher cash tax payments in the quarter, which were also partly due to phasing, were almost completely offset by lower CAPEX, which decreased by 1 billion SEK -on-year, driven by both restructuring programs as well as divestments. Working capital movements were negative in the quarter compared to a slight positive balance that we had last year, which is primarily due to, as Laura said, a return to an expected normal seasonal build-up in Asmode. The cash flow from financing activities includes an outflow in current year from net reimbursements of loans, with the inflow in the prior year relating to the share issue that you might recall. The cash flow from divested companies was 1.6 billion SEK in the quarter, and it's mainly related to the divestment of Sabre Interactive. The last line, the cash flow effect from items affecting comparability, primarily relates to the ongoing costs of the listing process of Asmode, where things are on track. Looking at the net debt, at the end of September our net debt amounted to 13.2 billion. During the quarter, you will recall, we announced the refinancing of our revolving credit facility of 600 million euro, with a two-year maturity and with a possibility of one-year extension. We had also announced that we've entered into a 500 million SEK loan agreement with the Swedish Export Corporation, with also similar terms in maturity. Embracer Group has a leverage covenant in its credit agreements, as you know, but it has a substantial headroom to it. And at the end of September, the available funds amounted to 8.2 billion SEK. With that said, over to you Lars.

Thank you, Mygge. So let's jump into this morning's big news and exciting news about Easybrain divestment. And to start, I would like to say that Easybrain were a fantastic acquisition that we made in 2021. It's been an honor to work with the team and the founders. They've been contributing a lot to the success of Embracer, both financially but also as a model of supporting entrepreneurs. The founders, Peter and Matt Wei, have been very loyal and they remain a very large shareholder of Embracer, together with the CEO Oleg, they've done a fantastic job to create value together with all his team of more than 300 people. Now, when the ads-driven mobile market is changing and becoming more difficult, we thought that Easybrain needed a bit different ownership, that have the ability to make the appropriate investments into the future. And the absolute perfect home for that is Miniclip, that are in the same industry, that is also led by a great entrepreneur and CEO of SAD. So I think the merge between the companies from an operation perspective or acquisition is really strong. So it makes a lot of sense for them and it makes a lot of sense for us. I'm also pleased to see that the quite notable purchase price would have a significant impact on the rest of the companies and the group of Embracer. The purchase price on a cash and debt-free basis is 1.2 billion or 12.9 billion SEK, all to be paid in cash at closing. And we are expecting closing early 2025. Expected net proceeds after transaction costs and other costs amounts to 12.7 billion. Again, Easybrain has been delivering a lot of value. I have to reiterate that it's been a tremendous value creation within that company. Including substantial dividends from them that we have been able to reinvest into other businesses the past three years. But the strategic rationale for us is it transforms our financial position. As you know, we have been not fighting in good collaboration with lenders, but it's been some rough two years. And now I'm really pleased as a shareholder and a CEO to stand here without basically having any net debt remains. So the transaction will strengthen the rest of the group. It's not only the transaction itself is positive, it's also strengthen the rest. And it enables the new spin-offs to be separated with much stronger balance sheets and positions to do more business. Looking at the financial impact, as Miggi reported, we had 14.2 billion net debt end of September. But if you add this as pro forma, we have 500 million on pro forma net debt by end of September. And then you should take the expected cash flow that are already coming in this quarter. So we should be positive. If you look on the pro forma net cash, excluding the ring fenced as Moody debts, we actually have close to 9 billion net cash position on pro forma basis in the remaining businesses. And that again would enable us to do many things. As stated in the quarterly this morning, it would enable us to contribute capital back into as Moody. So their leverage are in line where they could be strong and a great public company at listing. Isabrine had a fantastic last year, 23-24, and contributed with 3.4 billion in net sales and a just ebit of close to 1.4 billion. Most of it turned into cash flow with a fairly low capex. The performance this year, the first half, I wouldn't call it weaker, but it's a bit declining. 1.6 billion sales and 628 million in adjusted ebit. And considering they had a fantastic Q3 last financial year, year over year, that number would likely be a bit lower this year without disclosing any forward-looking multiple. So with that said, I would like to again thank the team in Cyprus and all advisors and team members. We've been working very hard. We worked all night to have this signed ahead of the report. So well done. Okay, so with that said, it's time for some Q&A. Martin might have some questions.

Okay, welcome to the Q&A session. I will start off with a couple of questions to you guys, and then I will let the floor in. And then I hope we have some people that want to ask questions on the conference call, and we also have a web formula which you can use. I see, Lars, that we have 22 minutes left. Do you think that will be enough? I'm ready for

any

questions,

Martin.

There's a lot to digest today, to be fair. I think let's just start a little bit on the quarter, and then we go into the rest later. Could you go through a little bit on the PC console sales performance, which was a little bit weak. I know you mentioned some performance of small mid games. Is there anything else that stands out here that you want to mention?

No, we did expect a weak performance, to be honest. We know we didn't have the big releases of last year, so it didn't come to a big surprise. But we can still see some minor titles underperforming a bit. And the problem in the industry, for us as well, obviously, is that when titles are underperforming and release getting delayed, and you have these fixed cost base, the margins is just becoming very difficult. So we are addressing this. It's a combination of delays, and also delays are making the games more expensive to make. On the EBIT level, as a shareholder, you obviously care most about the cash generation. So we have titles that we are working through the pipeline that generates cash, and it's still, even though it's painful to report, if you are a long-term shareholder, it's a sensible decision to keep many of those things in the pipeline. Because if you are canceling them, the investments are worthless.

Would you say that the effect from delays is the main thing?

I think in this quarter, to our expectations, the big impact is obviously the lack of new releases. But I would say a bit of underperformance, perhaps more than delays in this quarter. But now looking into the second half of the year, it's more about delays.

How do you feel about the Netram guidance? We don't do guidance. But you do really on the segments. Coloring. Coloring, okay. But you have one and a half months into the quarter, and you have Netram guidance for Q3 on PC console, mobile, tabletop. How challenging is that with the visibility that you have? Can you improve the visibility?

Ultimately, the way to communicate is to deliver. So whatever I say is, I don't know how much trust in our ability, because of the track record, I understand it could be difficult. But obviously we are improving our processes. We are improving our forecasting. Also the bot map model, the companies are learning. So now they are very much sandbagging in some instances. So I wouldn't sound obviously, we are not guiding. We are coloring for little or no EBIT contribution in the third quarter on PC console. Fairly conservative.

We appreciate that. Can we also talk a little bit about cash generation in the quarter? You are at a negative 500 million free cash flow. I noticed it's a lot of it is due to the working capital build up. Can we expect any reversal now in the next quarter? Hence you have a positive free cash flow outlook in the near term, or how should we view that?

Q2 as part of our quarterless split is a quarter already that particularly Asmode always generates negative working capital. So actually that predictability is something we have been announcing. Last year you would recall that Asmode had the unwinding of its inventory, which actually resulted in a favorable flow. It hence creates a bit of pollution in the way we read things. But this was the level we kind of expected. Having said that, we always iterate that the second part of the year is where we generate higher cash. And this is what we still project for.

Can you remind us on the seasonality of Asmode, percent of earnings in Q3 in the past, or if you would say first half compared to second half, is that possible to comment on?

I think what we could remind everyone is that September, October and November are very important periods in terms of sales for Asmode. So that is also why the months that precede are the months that we build up inventory. And then as we go into the peak season period, that's where we generate the sales. And therefore, the latter part of Q3 and Q4 is the period where we start converting that cash. And no surprises expected this year.

I think you'll have more information during the CMD next week.

Yeah, I was just about to ask you, could you give us any sort of preview on the CMD? What are you looking forward

to? Well, it's an exciting moment for the entire management team. We have been very often in the back. And now it's the time to really get out in the open, in the sunlight, and show what we do. And we have an industry that's amazing with very dedicated people, a lot of experts. I have the chance of leading a 2200 strong team across all continents. And we can't wait to share more about what we do and get some of you in the behind the stage, in the backstage, and understand what makes this unique business model so strong and so strong for the future.

What is your view on the feedback so far internally? It's interesting for us to know what on the spin-off process and any external communication or feedback that you could share.

Well, there is a lot of excitement because through the spin-off, what we expect is to be able to focus even more on our core strategy. It's obviously a very intense period leading up to the listing, but we are fairly ready. We had been having Joanne Embracer three years ago. We were actually, without even knowing it, ramping up slowly but surely our capabilities to operate on a listed market. So I would say there is a lot of excitement. And people, I mean, in the end, the most important part is the business. And we are excited about the future lineup and what comes next in the coming years. How important

would you say the news today about easy brain divestment? How important is that news for you really because your leverage is coming down a little bit. I think Lars touched upon that. How important is that for you to in order to sort of you're going to be able to resume the M&A agenda a little bit more? Could you elaborate a little bit?

It's mainly a question for Lars on what he intends to do on the proceeds.

Well, I did say though that my intention is to contribute capital back into the last one, to strengthen you and the team to do more business.

I mean, lower leverage is better for us in all senses. That's of course less debt repayment or less interest payments, less more capability to do M&A, to resume our second engine of growth. We've been we're always strong on organic, but we like to accelerate it through M&A, which we haven't been able to do for the last year and a half. So the perspective is quite exciting.

But organic is the main sort of core of your growth.

They go together. It's a dance between organic and M&A. If you look back over the last 10 years, most of the growth was organic. But again, from time to time, we balance between organic and inorganic growth.

OK, before we let the floor and conference in Lars, could you could we just talk a little bit about your comments for the full year? It's six months to go and you mentioned year on year lower earnings. I think you mentioned mainly due to delays, right? Anything else you want to add on?

Because of delays and a bit softer performance, but mainly due to delays, we are expecting lower earnings year over year, you know, end of story. No, this is. Good chunk of that is moving into next year, so as a long term shareholder, you know, you grab that cash regardless, but it's painful to stand here every every quarter and then you have another delay. So ultimately, if you're long term, you need just to make sure the products are to the quality, the team gets the time investments and the right release window. That's the best for shareholders. And

how do you feel about the new financial position that you are in? I feel really good. It was little sooner than we expected to see you at almost net that net cash now. How do you view the outlook and potential going forward to, you know, the financial position and capitalise in how how how should we look at embrace? There's balance sheet potential.

Obviously, the balance sheet holds a lot of potential. Now, you know, this is not twenty twenty one again, so I will not go on a walking crusade on acquisitions. So don't worry too much. But obviously there could be value creative investments potentially. But we could also decide to return capital to shareholders in terms of dividends or share buybacks. I think this is something we will evaluate now or the coming months with the board ahead of the closing and or just the cash on on the balance sheet. I think that's good for in our industry to be strong as a support and a business partner. And we are now in that position. So it doesn't hurt to have a bit of reserves.

Did you explore other potential alternatives for easy brain divestment?

How do you mean?

I mean, in order to always have alternatives, but strengthen the balance sheet, which obviously did now.

Yeah, it's it's you know, we have a base plan and that's what we are communicating. And sometimes we have alternative ideas that, you know, if the moment are right and secretive, we execute on them. You know, this process with easy brain, we didn't put them on on on the block for sale with bankers traveling the world. This was a mutual interest from the parties and and have to say that the buyers been really professional sticking to the word. We have a really good SBA in the back of that with, you know, So we feel really good about the legal terms in the transaction as well as to the degree you could. So that that kind of deal I prefer to do. They are good buyer. We get the good price strength and the rest. So

and have you experienced more interest in terms of the flow coming in since you announced the spin off processes? We

have a lot of interest for many things, but I'm not a seller. I'm more we are, you know, building something for the future. So this is not about buying selling companies. This is about building value for the future and organically grow the businesses.

All right. Thank you, Lars. I think it's time to see if we have any questions in the room. Please raise your hand.

Maybe we can go to the telco. The first question comes from the line of Eric Larsson from SEB.

Good morning. Can you hear me? Yes. Okay, perfect. I have two questions. I'll take them one at a time. So first of profitability and not maybe your guidance and PC console, but your color. We're now heading into Q3. It is a seasonally strong quarter and obviously few releases are not helping. But on a high level, you should ideally be able to generate the healthy margins on the catalog. So do you think that the cost base remains too high? Should we think that it's mainly amortizations remaining high from previous releases or anything else really that's burdening the margin?

Yes. So obviously the margins are also burdened by amortizations of many releases during the past two years. We need to remember that. So we have that bit of a rucksack to carry in the third quarter. But to your point, because of the sometimes low performance and delays and cost overruns, I think the margins within a number of the businesses are too low. I think we should always make a cash flow in all our significant groups every quarter. That's my base thinking. And as you say, the catalog should carry a profitability. So some groups are more into the growth investments phase build ups. Some have a more mature catalog and pipeline. So it's obviously a mix. But I would like us to make more money. It goes without saying within PC console, obviously.

Okay. Thank you. And then last question on Easybrain, which looks like a very good deal. And you did give some color just now. But if you go back one year, you were looked upon as more of a distressed seller and much less so yesterday. So I'm just curious on the process of this divestment. How was the interest? How long did you have these discussions and ultimately reach this value? Just interesting to hear.

Again, it was a mutual conversation that started late summer. And then we were able to reach the terms fairly recently, actually. And then that's why I put the deadline on the quarterly because for many reasons I don't want to be an insider post. Preferably, you don't never want to do to be an insider for too long. And you need to put deadlines. So hence this morning's announcement. So it helps that the buyer is, you know, the parent company buyer is obviously a big industry player and very professional. And also the actual buyer operationally are part of that group. And they know this industry inside out and know the company and the people quite well. So that helps a lot in this process. So it has been. It's been a great process.

All right, that's all for me. Thank you.

The next question is from Simon Jonsson from ABG Sandel Collier. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning all. So I also think it's quite interesting divestment here. And I understand that you will keep the crazy labs and the correct. So what is the vision for those remaining mobile assets?

Well, the vision is the same as with all entrepreneurial companies, you know, within Embracer that they focus and grow their businesses over time. They have obviously different business plans, but there is no change that plan. They are very successful. Crazy Labs has just recently transitioned from hyper casual to hybrid casual successfully. Alien Invasion was number four title number mobile segment in the second quarter. DECA goes from strength to strength. We just add a start tracking and we internalize their business. And I think I see many opportunities actually within DECA to potentially do even more titles and business in the future. So they are strong companies and there is no plans to divest them.

Excellent. Thank you. And with the divestment you make today, I mean, do you still expect or is it still the base case that you will still spin off

copystein reference? Yes, as communicated this morning, there is no change to our base plan. Obviously, the transaction this morning left the management and board to, you know, put even more deep thinking into the structure and asset allocation between the plans spin offs. So. But there is no other news other than the previous state that we are still expecting to to spin off. One of the entities in the calendar year, twenty twenty five.

Got it. Thank you. And lastly, on the Q3 color you gave and a follow up on Eric's question. Do you think that there are any specific game releases in Q3 that will sort of add to the negative burden from the amortization or is it more general theme that you are burdened by, you know, amortization from previous releases?

No, we again, we don't have any any notable releases in the third quarter, but we have a big pile of amortizations in the balance sheet of titles that has been underperforming. Looking into. You know, Q3, obviously, we just recently released Metro on VR. Very good receptions in general from fans and is, I think, great VR product to the quality standards standard. We should deliver. However, it's it's a fairly expensive game to make and such game, you know. It's not delivering a fantastic ebit, especially not on the short term. Then it's easier to deliver ebit on a title like the legacy of Kane, one and two remastered that looks fairly strong actually. Very small investment, but an iconic IP with a lot of raving fans waiting for that. So I think that. If anything, would contribute to the ebit in the quarter.

OK, thank you, Lord. Thank you, Simon. Next question from Thomas Singlers from City. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Good morning. It's Tom here from City. I had I would say three questions, I think maybe three groups of questions, so I apologize in advance. The first one is on sort of congestion in the launch pipeline that you flagged as a sort of market catristic. Obviously, totally makes sense. I'm just wondering whether you could help us sort of quantify just how much more congested the sort of broader market is in terms of launch activity. And then critically, when you anticipate it to ease off, that's the first cluster of questions. The second cluster was specifically on your. Launch activity. You've been very clear with the 3.1 billion SEC. Of the game development. To book value to release book value. Should we assume that all comes in the fourth quarter? Based on your commentary. And then the final one. Is is is really about the spin off of coffee stain and it's sort of linking back to the previous two, which is I mean, as you pointed out, the market doesn't massively like delays that sometimes they're just the right thing to do. And it raises a question about whether. If you console game really belongs in the public market, as opposed to the private market, so I'd be interested in your thoughts on whether a spin off of coffee stain could include a take private option. Thank you.

Well, on on the first question regarding the if I understand it correctly, the that there is a busy. Release window in the fourth quarter and when that easing off. You know, the industry is typically very busy in the in the fourth quarter ending March. You know, many of the colleagues in the industry have their year ends and for some reason. Many titles is is being shipped before the year end historically. And I see no difference this year. It's also a good season, obviously, for for the gamers in West to engage a piece of console games. So I and I think then the first quarter next year. Typically, much less. Busy. Now we have seen, I think this year less releases and I think comparing to. Comparing to previous year or years, there is a bit less releases coming through and I think that's a overall trend in the industry. I think that will continue. I think the you know, the the fight we have to to make a good business. I think everyone have within the industry, so it's nothing specific for for Embracer. Regarding book values, I think you're absolutely right. The absolute chunk of the book value being completed is in the fourth quarter, obviously driven by the finalization of Kingdom Come Deliverance to but also a number of other titles. However, you know, there is still a book value coming through in the third quarter. Don't take me wrong, but perhaps more in line with the first and second quarter of this year. Regarding take private, obviously, it's an impossible question for me to to to answer on. I personally. I would say enjoy, but I think I think there is. I think there is a place for us in the public markets. I think it's it's sometimes a brutal place, but also sometimes a fantastic place to tap into to build growth businesses, to communicate, to engage people and and you know, to to every quarter has, you know, someone asking questions. I think it's rather again perhaps becoming a bit more lazy. Not having that questions every quarter. So I'm in general positive to the public markets, especially here in Stockholm. So that's my base answering that question. So I know I have no plans to take the businesses private.

That's very clear and I'm glad to hear we haven't worn you down.

Close. Next question is from Rasmus Engberg from Kepler Chevrolet. Please go ahead.

Yes, I good morning. Actually, just one question left and I'm sorry if it's a bit boring and detailed, but when I look at PC console, the other revenues, which I think is mostly work for higher. It is done by something like three hundred million. It's always been around eight hundred million. Now it's below six hundred. Is that a new level or what's causing this? Is it part of the disposal? So what is it?

I would say it's more or less all relating to this disposal of Sabre interactive.

Okay, so this is kind of the new level. Gearbox.

Yeah.

Yeah. Gearbox Sabre disposal. So we can take this at the kind of a new level going forward. I

don't want to give too much guidance on that. But yes, we don't have Sabre Gearbox anymore. So.

Very good. Can I just while I have you on how that the disposal of the mobile business impact coffee stains growth characteristics. Is it business the rest of the business by going faster or

or

positively? Yes, yes, I thought so. But lower margins than obviously.

Mm. Coffee stain has fantastic margins.

Okay. All right. That's all for me. Thank you.

Next question from Nick Dempsey from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Yeah, good morning. I've got two left. Please. So just the first one is a follow up on an earlier question about adjusted. If it's kind of progress at PC console. So if we're looking into next year, if I 26 when we're balancing out amortization versus the revenue from the back catalog, could we should we assume that you get a decent positive adjusted edit in a quarter, which doesn't have notable new releases or for another whole year should we be assuming very limited adjusted edit in a quarter that doesn't have interesting new releases? Second, Pokemon TCG pocket that's been building up a good number of users online. Is that a structural factor that could drive a decline over the next couple of years in the physical Pokemon card sales, which would obviously have an implication for as many distribution business.

Why don't we let Thomas answer the last question to start with?

Right. Pokemon is an ecosystem. It's an amazing ecosystem where all the experiences combine each other and grow the grow the franchise. So no, it's absolutely not a bad news. It's an excellent news that the game is performing so well, even for the TCG. If you look back when Pokemon Go was released, the impact on the sales of the physical products were extremely positive. So in our point of view, anything that's good for the license is good for the TCG and for us.

Regarding next year, I look optimistic to the future in terms of, in general, in terms of profitability and growth driven by the pipeline. But we are not able to provide today a color on the amortizations and for each of the quarters next year. It's a great question, Nick. And I think we need to also wait for many of the planned releases in the second half of this year. You know, when are they shipping? What's the performance? Obviously, that is also a key driver for for your question. Thank

you. Okay,

thanks. Questions at this time from the teleconference.

Okay, thank you for that. I see we're running out of time, but I want to ask just one or two questions from the from the web as well here. We have a question from Keiric Mamre Johansen. He's asking, are game release delays mostly due to optimizing the release window or mostly due to longer and hence more expensive game development, which would reduce the ROI potential of the delayed games?

I think it's more down to actual delays, which is causing cost overruns to be fair. It's a little bit perhaps less to release windows, but we are trying to optimize release windows that could cause some movements that has impact. You can debate in general. He's correct. In general, delays is causing more expensive games that ultimately if they don't perform better for that cost investment, everything else equal the return of investment becomes lower. However, there is obviously exceptions to that. You know, for example, when we released that island like a year ago, we decided to postpone it two months, costing some millions. But I think that paid off very well. So I think it's not equaling always that the performance is just weaker. I think that actually strengthened the return of investment on that island.

And when it comes to pipeline and releases, Kingdom Come Deliverance 2, you're still expecting 11 February. You're confident, obviously? I'm very

confident about that. I've been checking in and I'm very fairly into

that process. What do you think about the game if you compare to the previous?

No, I think it's absolutely amazing. I think we are delivering so many hours of amazing gameplay and experience to consumers. It's crazy for that amount of money. So it's a bargain in relation to the amount of hours and investments going into that price. One

final question from the web. It's Alex is asking, is shared buyback and dividend programs as seen in successful examples in the tech industry something that we could soon be expected from Embracer?

As a shareholder, I'm always open to returning capital to shareholders. I think, again, we need to do the homework at the board level first. But I don't have any issues with us paying dividends.

OK, I think it's time to round it up. What do you look forward to at the SMDC next week?

Wow. Obviously there is more detail and granularity coming. I've seen part of it, but I haven't seen the full presentation. I'm actually looking forward to see it. I've been busy doing other things.

OK, looking forward to see you all next week. And thanks for today. Thank you in the audience and on the stream and for the questions at the web as well. Thank you.

Thank you very much.