This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

Meko AB (publ)
7/25/2025
Good morning and welcome to MEKO's presentation of our results for the second quarter 2025. I'm here with our CFO, Christer Johansson, and together we will walk you through our performance and current position. Already in the first quarter, the market slowed somewhat, affected by international turbulence and uncertainty about the economy. This situation continued into the second quarter with lower demand. This also intensified competition, particularly in Denmark and Poland. All in all, this impacted our Q2 sales and our organic growth decline compared to the same quarter last year, which actually was the strongest in our history. For some time now, we have stepped up our efforts to build a stronger and more profitable MIACO. This has included extensive savings and optimization initiatives, which have shown clear effect. But the slower market have affected both our sales and results in Q2, despite our focus on efficiency. And we are responding to this immediately. So we're now launching a new cost reduction program that will lower our costs by 100 million SEK annually, with full effect going into 26. Beyond reducing costs, we're also working with more focus to increase our sales. Several activities are underway, both locally and at group level. We are renewing our focus on exclusive brands and have continued to bring our upgraded central warehouses into operation in Q2. In addition, we'll launch our new ERP in Poland as the first market. So let me show you a brief status on the efficiency improvements. And let's turn to next slide. We launched the initiative Building a Stronger America in late 2023. The aim is clear to improve profitability and long-term growth. In short, Building a Stronger Mirko focuses on these three areas. First, cost reductions and increased efficiency through consolidating our branch network, cutting costs, and leveraging on our new warehouses. Second, supplier optimization, making sure we work more effectively with our suppliers. And third, our new business system, for enabling a greater synergies across the group. And as of today, we are approaching the final stages of consolidation of branch network and driving down costs. We have also seen significant benefits from these efforts. We have almost completed the implementation of our new upgraded warehouses. However, the benefit is still ahead of us. Right now, we're still burdened by costs from the old manual solutions and paying double rent. This will no longer be the case in 2026. We are also about halfway through the implementation and realization of benefits from our supplier optimizations. And as for the ERP, we have already taken significant implementation costs while the benefits are still to come. All in all, we have already achieved improvements of 200 million SEK thanks to these initiatives, and there are substantial gains still to be realized. And now to address the weaker market, we're launching a new cost reduction, adding another 100 million SEK in savings. So let's take a look where we stand with our warehouse projects and go to the next slide. All our high-tech warehouses in Denmark, Finland and Norway were completed on time and in Q2 we were able to go live in Norway as well. We still expect all warehouses to be fully operational during the autumn. These projects has demanded a lot of focus from us and we have been careful to minimize the operational risks. The project has not been without their challenges, but we are now very close to completing an important strategic upgrade of Merco's logistics. This will be key in our efforts to drive long-term growth. So let's take a look at another of our growth initiatives on slide five. During the quarter, we announced accelerated efforts within exclusive brands. This has been a priority for us some time, but we see clear demand for more affordable products alongside our premium range under the ProMaster brand. To meet this need, we are creating a new division led by Henrik Pettersson. He will take full responsibility for our exclusive brands portfolio across the group. This will provide us with a sharper focus, allowing us to expand the product offering and create tailored solutions for every situation our customers face. So let's move to slide six. Sustainability is a core part of everything we do at MEKO. And in that area, our key priority is reducing our climate footprint. That's why we're pleased to say that in May, our science-based climate targets were approved. Our long-term ambition is net zero emissions by 2050, and we now have clear milestones on the way there. This approval is an endorsement of our strategy, and we're proud to be among the first in our industry to reach this point. You can find a detailed description of our near-term and long-term targets at meco.com. Now, let's turn to our successful bond issue in June. So I'll hand over to Kriste.
Thanks, Per. And good morning to those of you who are on the call. So to put the transaction into context, we did refinance our revolving credit facility in Q1 of this year. And we mentioned then that we would also explore refinancing of the 1.25 billion SEC bond maturing over in early 26. So sticking to our proactive approach in managing the maturity profile, we opened books on June 4th. And we were pleased to see strong demand, especially for a five-year tenure. Pricing closed at three-month STIBOR plus 215 basis points, with books being 1.4 times oversubscribed. So the proceeds are used to repurchase the equally sized existing bond. and we saw a 60% participation in the tender offer with the remaining 40% being called here later in Q3. The transaction also came with 5 million SEK in financial cost in the quarter, but we are of course very pleased both with securing a 35 basis point rate improvement and with the next majority now being over in July, 2027. Turning to financials for the quarter as a whole on page 8, Q2 did indeed turn out to be a challenging quarter, especially when comparing to Q2 24, which is the all-time high. To start, we have a revenue development characterized by negative organic growth mounting to minus 5%. This is after adjusting for FX, variation in working days, both of which also contributed negatively in the quarter. This negative organic growth was driven primarily by lower volumes and despite the geographical diversification, this trend was largely uniform across business areas. We identify end customer confidence and behavior as one factor with repairs and service being delayed and in some cases, migrating towards lower cost offerings products. With regards to margins, we see how the lack of underlying market growth contributed to a sharpening of the competitive dynamics. I will come back with more details on the following pages, but as is evident, we were not able to offset this shortfall in gross profit. Consequently, it translated into a steep decline in adjusted EBIT, which came in at 175 million SEK. The shortfall in gross profit also contributed to a lower cash flow from operations, which nevertheless amounted to almost 500 million SEK. And in those 500, we have absorbed an initial stocking up of the new warehouse in Norway, which amounted to a bit more than inventory. Separate from operations Q2 was as expected an intense quarter in terms of investment and this is reflected also in the items affecting comparability which include 33 million SEAC of cost linked to our ERP program and 22 million SEAC of cost linked to temporary double rents in connection with the large warehouse projects. And while some of those will fall away fairly soon, the underlying development is certainly not one which we can accept. And we are, as Per mentioned, taking firm actions Moving to page 9, I mentioned sharpening competitive dynamics and this was especially evident in Denmark and Poland where we directed significant attention to monitor and mitigate movements in the market. On a slightly more technical note, it's also so that product margin is affected by the level of supplier bonuses. These are typically annual but our accruals and the projections that underpin them are updated quarterly. So with volumes being lower than earlier trend this explained about the third of the year over year compression in margin. As a final remark similar to the last three quarters the fact that we have grown in a low margin market like Poland will in itself dilute margins And this alone represent about the percentage point reduction here included in other. On page 10, I mentioned already that many of the underlying factors were actually common across markets in Q2. This included soft demand and margin pressure. Another common factor in Q2 was far reaching changes in our internal logistics, which applied to Denmark, Norway, Poland and Finland. It did involve some challenge, as Per mentioned, and I guess it often does. But thanks to the dedication of our respective teams, much of this is now behind us. Consequently, it is with confidence that we now continue the ramp up towards full efficiency and the ramp down towards new staffing levels. And that activity will extend throughout Q3 and Q4. Before we look at the individual markets I wish to comment briefly on our financial position on page 11. So the development in leverage which increased in Q2 to 2.7x is the net result of two opposing factors. So on the one hand we have in the quarter reduced net debt by 150 million SEK. On the other hand we've seen a larger reduction in EBITDA That said, 2.5 is still well within our 2 to 3 target range. And for the sake of clarity, I want to repeat that we define leverage excluding IFR 16. And I also want to mention that EBITDA is measured on a rolling 12-month basis, where the strong Q3 last year will work against us in the short term. With regards to outlook, there are however two more fundamental things to highlight. Firstly, one should note that CapEx investment has been exceptionally high in recent quarters. This is of course due to the ongoing projects. It's not a new normal and it will revert to normalized levels now that we are approaching completion. Secondly, we do from time to time get questions around M&A. And as I'm sure you will understand, our focus now is on completing all the things we have going and on reducing debt. And we don't see that changing anytime soon. Leaving the topic of leverage and turning to liquidity, we note that Mekos available cash and unutilized credit facilities exceed 2 billion SEK and in combination with an improved majority profile, our financial position remains strong. On page 12, briefly on Denmark. So I've already mentioned that this is one of the markets where competition is tangible. Fewer working days and a stronger CIEC also added to the organic growth of negative 7%. As one part of mitigating this, we have been tuning our pricing with promising initial signs. And this goes down to specific customers, specific products with adaptation being surgical rather than broad based. On the warehouse project in Denmark, just to give you a sense, I can mention that at the end of June, we had moved circa 85% of the inventory. we're approaching 100 fast because we are handing back the keys to the old premises here in august moving on to finland the macroeconomic backdrop remains unhelpful probably more so than in our other markets cost efficiency has been in focus for some time but will remain so in q2 we have however added resources on the sales side, and we have also opened a new regional distribution center in Oulu. Similar to the warehouse automation, this is about positioning ourselves for the long term in Finland. Looking at Poland on page 14, there are quite a few moving parts. As in recent quarters, the year over year comparison is affected by the acquisition of Elite in Q3 2024. stripping out that together with fx and variations in working days this business area is exhibiting better organic growth than our other markets the bigger challenge in the short term is however the combination of salary inflation and price pressure and that applies of course both to meco's pre-existing polish business and to elite so Consequently, the year over year reduction in EBIT is coming partly from the consolidation of elite, but also partly from tougher conditions in our pre-existing business where not least the export business has suffered in 2025. As Per mentioned, the quarter also included moving the regional warehouse in Warsaw and going live with the first parts of our new ERP. So quite an impressive effort by the Polish team, well beyond what the Q2 numbers themselves suggest. With regards to integration of Elite, we said in 24 that this would be an ongoing activity up to the end of 25. That still seems about right. We're making good progress. To give a few examples, we had by the end of Q2 eliminated half of the overlap in branch networks with the outcome so far lining up well to the business case. Other examples of progress from this quarter include unifying the fleet offer and optimizing parts of logistics. So in getting the first half of the integration done and we've actually spent less than expected but then again we are obviously not done until this is a fully integrated and profitable part of the business area Sweden Norway on page 15 has been performing well in recent years but did not escape the market slowdown we saw organic growth coming in at negative six percent What is encouraging is the extent to which our previous cost cutting efforts are coming through. And these are actions that we took in 24. And they explain why adjusted EBIT margin is still close to 10% despite the weak top line. Also here, the quarter includes certain level of product cost and duplication related to the central warehouse in Norway. Within Sørensen and Balskjern on page 16, both volumes and margins were holding up relatively well. Adjusted EBIT margin is still north of 18%. On the operational side here, the new warehouse in Norway is designed to support all our business in the country, including that of Sørensen and Balskjern. And as we come back here after summer, we will pick up pace ahead of that move, which will take place late 2025. And I can just mention that the related lease agreements have been canceled and hence also here, it's only a matter of time until this duplication comes to an end. So with that, I would like to hand back to you, Per.
Okay, thanks. Well, to summarize, we continue to see a slower market affected by international turbulence and economic uncertainty. This impacted our cue to organic growth and results. We are acting immediately and have launched a forceful cost reduction program, adding to the Building Stronger MECO initiative. And as we have seen, we are near completion in several of the key areas in these initiatives and are burdened by implementation costs. However, many of the benefits are still to come. This is also true for the strategic upgrade of our logistics. It has demanded a lot of focus from us so far in 2025, but we are now very close to the finish line. This will strengthen us over time and enable future growth, just like the other initiatives we are undertaking to continue building a stronger company, even in a challenging market. So that will be all for me. So thank you for listening. And we are now open up for questions.
If you wish to ask a question please dial pound key 5 on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question please dial pound key 6 on your telephone keypad. We kindly ask you to mute yourself after having asked your question. Next question comes from Mats Lis from Kepler Shoebrew. Please go ahead.
Yeah, hi. Thank you. A couple of questions. First, I mean, you have this cost, well, savings program implemented or about to be implemented, 100 million. Could you give some more color there in what geographical areas and where you are sort of implementing these measures?
I can't give you details and that is respect to the different processes in different countries and firstly thinking about the negotiations with the unions and so on. But it is spread all over all eight countries. a little bit in different places of course and it is mostly related to personal costs. Little part of it is other operating costs also but the main part is people. But it's in all levels and in all countries.
And should we expect these measures to be implemented by the end of the year by and large or is it? Starting from next year, these costs will be out. And the extra costs you will sort of... What's the payback, I guess?
This is... Good morning, Mats. We have not yet disclosed that and we're kind of working out some of the details in those plans. So it would be a little bit too early to say. But I would say typically, I mean, We're not expecting to see a big net benefit in this year, of course, because even though some of the cost savings will start, there's also a cost associated, as you alluded to. But going into next year, we should see the full benefits.
Thank you. And then sort of, well, starting with Finland, I mean, it's tough market conditions, as it sounds. And have you sort of You have made some measures already integrating your previous operation in Finland with the equivalent and it seems to be insufficient. What can you do to adapt to these weaker market conditions if they remain? It's still a loss there.
Finland is also, of course, including in the cost saving programs. So there will be low costs and by that higher efficiency in Finland. And they have done a lot of things. There is still effects to gain with a new warehouse because that is not completed. So we are a little bit overstaffed in the warehouse, which will people that will be released in the autumn. So there's a lot on the cost side. But we also, as Christy mentioned, we also started up regional warehouse to increase the availability. We're working on the assortment to make sure that we have the right products for that kind of market. And also actually doing some sales initiatives to actually have strengthened the sales organization just the last couple of months. So there is a lot of activities ongoing.
Great. Moving to Denmark, it seems that you have met some tougher competition there. And then you also mentioned that you have met some price and customer changes or address. This new competition, is it sort of something that will remain or is it sort of temporary that competitors try to reduce inventories on the back of softer demand? Could you say something?
I don't think it is very temporary. Denmark has always been a competitive market. It goes in waves and it's probably due to that competitors want to try to gain some market shares, different efforts. And to be very honest,
i would suspect that we have people listening to this call so exactly what we are doing to mitigate this is more of a competition secret okay great uh in denmark you also have this new barrel structure implemented and you mentioned that 85 percent of the inventory have been moved so will there be sort of due to these uh I mean you do this in other markets as well can you release some working capital supporting cash flow going forward also besides the 200 million of cost savings I mean
Yeah, now let me give you a little bit of color to that. So I think in the quarter, as I mentioned, we did see an impact on working capital. And this is specifically in Norway, where we did not have a central warehouse. So we've been stocking up. On the other hand, as we approach the end of 2025, then we will merge the operations of Sjönsson & Balken into this new warehouse. So I think by that time we will sort of be able to get some of that back in terms of efficiency. But overall, we are not expecting a big benefit or a big negative effect in working capital from these initiatives. On the other hand, when it comes to staffing, of course, there's a totally different level of staffing required in an automated setup. So that's the main sort of angle to these business cases.
Great. Okay. It seems that these rather subdued market conditions have continued in the third quarter. Is that to be expected? You're moving here into this third quarter and it's sort of no big difference. The year-over-year comparison is still quite tough.
We don't guide in the future, but we do these measures with the cost savings because we can't hope that it will suddenly change. The uncertainty around us is probably more than I can control and we need to do what we can do simply to improve our
If I can add there, so I think in the factors that we can influence, for example, the progress in our projects, we are confident. As we've said on this call, a lot of the challenges are actually behind us. So we're moving forward at a good pace on that front. At the same time, of course, there are external factors which we may not be able to influence.
Okay, great. Thank you very much. Thank you.
As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad. Please remember to mute yourself after having asked your question. There are no more questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.
Well, just thank you very much for listening and I hope you will continue to have a great summer. Thanks.