Medivir AB (publ)

Thank you very much and welcome everyone to our quarterly report for the quarter one 2025 and we'll go through a presentation for the first sort of 2025 minutes and then we'll open up the floor for questions. uh as we dive into uh quarter one and quarter one highlights the most important sort of step in the first quarter was of course uh presenting the final study data from from our phase one b to a study which we presented at the eas liver cancer summit in paris in february A study that's taken way longer to conclude and close than we initially anticipated as patients have been staying on treatment much, much longer than we initially estimated, which is sort of clearly a positive signal with regards to patients benefiting from treatment. Step two, we continued preparations for the planned Phase 2b study, which we named Focus 2, so that continues. But what also happened in quarter one was an important first step from a patent protection perspective, and that is we received the first patent approval for the important combination of Fos-Trox Middlen Vatanib by the European Patent Authority. And then from a business development and partnering perspective, the key step was Infex Therapeutics, our partner in the UK. They signed the licensing agreement for the MedTech development in India. We'll come back to that element sort of briefly as well towards the end. With me in the room as always is our CMO Pia Baumann who will be walking through some of the data that we presented at EASL. Magnus will come back towards the end with regards to the financials and then our CSO Fredrik Öberg is in the room as well for any sort of questions during the Q&A session. So with that, let's dive into the key event of the first quarter, i.e. the presentation of the final results of the FOSTRUX Blåsland Vattenhiv study. Pia, over to you.

Thank you, Jens. And these end-of-treatment results were presented, as Jens said, in Paris at the ESEL conference. And the study actually closed in November last year. And the data that we presented came from this study. And I thought that maybe I'd just do a little bit of a short repetition of what the study was about. And also the poster is available on Medivir's website. You can see it as a little tiny thing up to the right corner here. But if you would like to look more in detail, we have it on the website. So the eligible patients for this study was those who had locally advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, or as we continue to say here, liver cancer. The patients were enrolled at 15 sites in the UK, Spain, and South Korea, with the majority receiving a FosTrox dose of 30 mg that was taken orally for 5 days in a 21-day cycle, together with Lenvima that was given in a standard dose for liver cancer, and that was also given orally on a continuous basis. So in order to sort of understand responses, imaging was done with both CT and MRI every six weeks during the full follow-up time. And the primary endpoint for this study was safety. And secondary endpoints included overall response rate, disease control rate, time to progression, and overall survival. And that is what we are going to focus on when it comes to results today. So we can go to the next slide. So we now have a mature median follow-up for this patient population, which is 10.5 months in median. And Fostrox and Lenvima showed here a substantially longer median time to progression with 10.9 months and an overall survival with 13.7 months. And this is compared to mainly retrospective data that we have seen in the second line setting. So it's really encouraging data. And we have also seen previously that we had the best overall response rate was 24% with the median duration of this response of seven months. with a disease control rate of 81%. So it is encouraging from both a safety and efficacy perspective to see that patients are benefit fitting from this treatment during a longer period of time. And we actually have these patients that now it's not in the study anymore, but it's still ongoing after being transferred to a compassionate use program and has been on the treatment for more than two and a half year. You can go to the next slide. So coming back to this, that we sort of see, we evaluate the patients relatively early, looking at overall response rate. But it's also very important to understand, OK, what happens with these patients? And you can see this Yeah, we call it spaghetti plot, but to understand sort of what happened during time. And the patients continued to be relatively stable during this treatment time. So those who actually received response continued with response, as we said, for about seven months in medium, but the majority had tumor control. And actually tumor reduction was seen in more than 75% of the patient. and we could see a median duration of clinical benefit of 11.3 months. And what we mean with clinical benefit is really those who responded and those who had a stable disease, which is really important in liver cancer to also have a stable disease for clinical benefit. And this stable disease should be more than 24 weeks to be included in the clinical benefit rate. And if you compare with what you see in advanced liver cancer, this is very long, and particularly in the second and third line advanced liver cancer. So we can go to the next slide. So the safety and the tolerability profile with this combination was really good. And the majority of the patients could continue with the initial dose of Fos-Trox through the treatment. For the 29% that required dose reduction of Fos-Trox in order to find the correct individual dose level, as you often see in this kind of program, because you want to be as high as possible. And you always know that some of the patients will dose reduce. But that sort of is also something that we are looking carefully into because we don't want to see that this kind of dose reduction affects the efficacy outcome. And in this slide, you can see here that the dose reduction didn't really impact The response to treatment, the ones who are in the orange here are those who dose reduce. And we could see that reduction in target size was seen independently if they had done a dose reduction or not. So I think I'll leave it back to Jens now. Thank you.

Thank you, Pia. That kind of closes out the study in terms of sort of having now presented final data. So we've lived with this study for quite some time and happy to be able to present the final and the mature data set. uh as i mentioned uh i mean sort of sometimes we sort of we we don't often speak too much about patent approvals and it's sort of something that is usually i mean there there is an expectation that this business as usual we wanted to highlight this one because this is With the combination patent of Fosstrux Plus Lendvima, having that approval in Europe, there's a couple of things that are important. One, having the European authority approve it, that signals positively the follow-on from other patent authorities as the European authority is seen as a highly respected one and one that others do follow. So that's one critical element. The other part is that it is with phosphorous plus lenvatinib and it is for liver cancer and cancer metastases in the liver. And since this is the combination and this is the indication that we are targeting and that will be the key one for the drug, This will be a strong patent protection, i.e. then extending the patent protection until 2041, which sort of provides protection for quite a long time. So it was an important sort of step in terms of generating protection support for as long as we possibly can. So quite encouraged by that. So then having seen sort of data, sort of final data, the mature data set sort of being quite encouraging, we now see that the combination, we're extending patent protection until 2041 to sort of somewhat broaden our horizons. One of the things that that we continue to see in this area is that the, whereas many other tumor types, we see sort of lower incidences and lower death rates, liver cancer is one of the tumor types that unfortunately go in a different direction. We see already today growth in liver cancer very many times driven by growth in fatty liver disease. This is a relatively recent article where they've looked at how is fatty liver disease anticipated to evolve in the next in this case or then they modeled it until 2050 which is sort of quite some time but basically it's going to grow at an alarming rate uh so the and the the consequence is that if you have a fatty liver disease and so there's a study at karolinska that has shown that you have a 17 times increased risk of being diagnosed with liver cancer. So an alarming rapid increase of fatty liver disease will give a very sort of significant increase to liver cancer. And the anticipation here is that the incidence, and now we look at U.S. numbers, that a number of patients, the incidence number of patients will double. And with incidence number of patients doubling, it will grow the prevalence even further. So we look at it from a commercial potential perspective, the liver cancer sort of market growth will grow even faster because more patients will be treated, more patients will be treated longer with better treatments being available in first line and earlier settings. we are anticipating quite a growth in the market. And just to kind of highlight the numbers in the article, sort of, well, we see a certain degrees of fatty liver disease that drives an even faster increase with regards to the incidence of, in this case, HCC or primary liver cancer. I think we've shown previously, and this is sort of shorter term estimate, that the market, we're seeing the market grow. That market is growing quite rapidly, estimated to grow rapidly until 2030. So if we look at some of the latest reports and the latest developments with regards to fatty liver disease, these numbers in terms of market growth is likely to be underestimated and if anything it will probably grow even even faster than this so clearly a quite significant commercial potential uh And then to kind of close out the events of the first quarter, as I sort of mentioned, we've been our partner in the UK, originally AMR, but sort of later renamed to Infex Therapeutics who are driving the METEX program. They signed an agreement or licensing agreement for development in India for a phase one study to be followed by a phase two study. and the important element sort of if you dig through the uh the press release and the information they've shared is that they are also working with the company in this case venus and designing the study so that the data from these studies are also applicable and can be used with regulatory authorities in other parts of the world so it's a good way of driving the uh the program forward Clearly, Infex will receive license fee payments, milestone payments, et cetera. And our agreement with Venus is a relatively strict sort of revenue share. So we are entitled to a share of any potential sort of revenue that Infex receives from this program. So with that, we'll close out the events of the first quarter and go to the financials before we go back to Q&A.