Rugvista Group AB (publ)

Thank you very much. Good morning everyone and welcome to our second quarter earnings. And we're happy to see so many participants this time around as well. This is Michael and I got Joakim here with me as well. Let's kick it off. With a quick highlight regarding the ROYGAROG, regarding Q2. I think overall what we see is that our order growth continues at healthy levels. But that the market remains quite challenging from multiple perspectives. I think we want to start off talking a little bit about the strategic issues we've been working on over the past couple of years. And the effect that we're starting to see of those. So we still are able to maintain a very high level of customer satisfaction, which is quite good. We are also in a position to grow our order volumes more than double digits. This is in a market where the consumer sentiment, albeit in some of the major markets, improved during the quarter. But remains at quite low levels. And we also see that the inflation has made the purchasing power of the European households quite weak. And also want to highlight the outdoor rug season, which primarily constitutes the second quarter. And where we saw more than a 50 percent increase year over year in the sales contribution from that subcategory. From a revenue perspective, we essentially were flat minus one percent versus half a percent actually versus last year. Organically minus one percent. The reason the net revenue was a tad bit lower is due to the decrease in the average order value, where the customer price sensitive behavior is negatively impacting growth. On the profitability side, the positive thing is that the variable profitability, so the major costs associated with orders or sales actually decreased year over year and quarter over quarter. So the items part of gross margin in addition to marketing being the variable costs. However, the EBIT margin was significantly lower versus last year and to a large extent driven by one of costs related to reorganizations, as well as a negative outcome in the line item operation expenses, which is very much related to currency effects. To note also, of course, is that the second quarter is our seasonally smallest. And then, like I mentioned, we're quite proud and continue to see our high customer satisfaction ratings as something proving that we're doing the right things for our customer. So with that being said, let's do a few quick deep dives. Where if we look at the strategic APIs that we follow in terms of customer satisfaction, more penetration and attracting new customers on the MPS and Trustpilot, we still maintain very, very strong ratings. The MPS order count and new customer account both grew in the lower double digits and despite, like I mentioned, the quite tough market conditions. We see, and I can highlight in a couple of markets here on this slide, that the consumer sentiment did improve slightly, especially in Germany, and remain flat in a couple of markets, highlighted here by France, but still at low levels when looking at from a slightly longer time series. And on the topic of average order value, we on the left hand side, part of the slide, we want to highlight how our price group of mixed offering has developed over time. So essentially it's showing, okay, what do the customers have available to purchase from us by price group, article price group. And what we can see here is that we, during the course of the last year, have actually slightly increased our offering within the higher price ranges and have remained relatively flat when it comes to our offering within the price range below 2000 CEAC. Despite this, we see a clear and have seen during the past four quarters essentially a clear AOV average order value decline, which isn't very much driven by consumers to a much higher degree compared to historically selecting the lower priced items. And then I think the order growth that we've seen during this period does reflect that we have an assortment that is attractive for the consumers we try to reach. And of course, we will continue to develop our assortment offering over time in one of the key areas that we're working on. And that being said, looking a little bit into the outdoor assortment where last year was the first year we made a specific or concerted effort to ensure that we improved that portion of our offering. We did further improvements for this season and can really see the impact of those efforts where we actually grew sales within the subcategory by more than or about 50 to 70 percent compared to last year. So with that being said, let me hand it over to you, Joakim. Thank

you, Michael. And as Michael mentioned here in the beginning, we saw a good quarter growth during the second quarter, but the drop in average order makers drop in net revenue 0.5 percent or organically minus 1 percent. For the business units to the left in the slide here, our largest segment B2C is down by 0.7 percent and marketplaces and other, which mainly is Amazon, is up by 24.8 percent. B2B declined 3.7 percent in the quarter where the larger drop was in smaller businesses. And that is a subsegment that otherwise often replicate the trends in the B2C segment. In the graphics to the right, you can see the regional development in our B2C segment. So DACH dropped 1.4 percentage points, although with double digit growth in August. The Nordic still performing better, growing by 8.6 percent. The rest of the world, which is mainly the rest of Europe, we decreased by 4.2 percentage points. So we see growth in Western Europe, but a higher drop in sales in the southern and eastern parts of Europe. So moving on to the gross margins. So we dropped the gross margin with 0.6 percentage points versus last year, but we improved 1.4 percentage points on quarter one this year that came out on 61.6 percent. So the margin drop versus prior year was driven by a higher share of sales on discount. And the improvement versus quarter one this year was mainly driven by a general price adjustment that we made in early April. And in the report, we say that the price increase was a few percentage points. So if we go to the segments, the margin decreases in all segments and the main driving factor is the higher discounts this year. In marketplaces and other, the drop is a bit higher by 4 percent, and this is our smallest segment. And here we tested new campaigns during the quarter, which negatively impacted margin. But as you saw, positively impacted the net turnover. The B2C and the B2B segments are with 0.6 and 0.7 percent drop respectively, which is explained by a higher share of sales on discounts. So moving on to cost ratios and the EBIT margin. So the second quarter is our low season historically. So cost increases and one-offs get a higher impact with that lower volume. And I just spoke about the margin variances versus last year and the same explanations apply to the goods for resale with higher discounts than prior year. And bear in mind here that the goods for resale percentage is not exactly 100 minus the gross margin as the other income is included in the gross profit. There is a 0.4 percent difference here. In other external expenses, we have improved 0.8 percentage points, and this is due to our focus on marketing efficiency resulting in lower marketing cost, which was 1.4 percentage points lower. And as a total improvement was 0.8, there are also cost increases driven by expenses related to preparations for the move to a new warehouse and office in the summer of 2025. That is the smaller part of cost increases. And then we have increased IT costs. Personal costs increased by 5.6 percentage points. Organizational changes resulted in one-time costs of 2.5 million SEK. The remaining cost increases were driven by a higher number of employees, general salary increases, and the transition of staff at the Berlin office from externally hired, that were in the costs before, to the employed personnel on our payroll. In other operating expenses, we have the foreign exchange effects on transactions from the revaluation of assets and liabilities in foreign currency. And this effect was negative this quarter versus positive last year and hence sums up to a total of 1.1 percentage points cost increase. Last, depreciation and amortization has increased versus last year. It is driven by rent increases, the new warehouse that we contracted in quarter four, and the fact that we have started amortization of our intangible assets, our ECON platform. And this also implies that as from now and as from the next quarter, any further development costs from our ECON platform will no longer be activated in the balance sheet, but directly expensed in the income statement. The bottom line here is dropped by 7.3 percentage points in EBIT margin. Moving on to inventory. So inventory increased by 20 million versus the year end number and decreased by 25 million versus the same period close last year. So during this first half of the year, we are building inventory to be prepared for the high season in the second half. And this is a planned increase. And if you look at the right, we are within our target range of carrying inventory between 17.5 and 22.5 percent of the last 12 months of net revenue. So we ended the quarter with 21 percent. We move on to cash. So cash flow from operating activities decreased due to the lower earnings, but mainly decreased due to the working capital increase. So the inventory buildup for the high season is one part of that working capital increase, a planned increase. Another is decreased accounts available to supplier, which could swing in a short period like this. Cash flow from investing activities is mainly the investment in our new e-commerce platform, and that was somewhat lower than prior year. So the net cash position that you can see to the right here at the end of quarter two was 138 million, an improvement of 56 million versus prior year. And during quarter two, we paid a dividend of 37 million versus prior year 31 million. And it's not in this slide, but our cash balance at the end of the quarter was 155 million compared to 104 million a year ago, an increase by 51 million. So all in all, we have a strong balance sheet. We have no interest bearing debt to financial institutions and we have a good cash position. So I hand over to you, Michael.

Thank you, Joakim. So a little bit of a summary and outlook. And I think the key message is that we continue to focus on navigating the market conditions in combination with continuously improving our customer offering organization. And of course, here in the near term, also preparing for the peak season starting towards the end of Q3. And we are quite pleased to see that the efforts on our strategic initiatives are paying off. With the outdoor, we talked to the outdoor sort when we talked about continuous order and new customer growth and maintaining a very high level of customer satisfaction. During the quarter, we also focused quite a bit on enhancing our own site or web user experience in the web shop. In addition to implementing a new email marketing platform, which will intend to enable us to drive even more organic traffic moving forward. Moving on to the second point, I think the one-offs, of course, greatly impacting the profitability. But financial position remains strong and we are able to face the uncertain outlook from a position of strength, so to speak. We, of course, see that the net revenue was essentially flat and very much driven by the price sensitive consumer behavior. And in its combination of multiple factors, but of course, a bit of down training within categories, category mix in addition to higher share of sales on discounts. The very profitability improving and then, of course, are the largest cost items within that metric. In addition to the personnel costs, of course, and that we stay efficient on the variable costs is very important. Because that ensures that once we continue, once we get further order growth, that is something that will roll down all the way to the bottom line. EBIT was 2.4 million during the quarter, a significant decline profitability wise or EBIT margin wise versus last year and to a large extent driven by the one-off costs we mentioned. Worth noting, of course, is the dividend payout during the quarter based on the AGM decision, 1.8 per share. And in looking a little bit out, looking into the future a little bit, we see that the outlook remains uncertain. The development with the development in the large economies in central and southern Europe being especially difficult to predict. Despite that, we continue to focus on navigating those conditions, of course, developing ourselves as an organization or customer offering and preparing for the peak season, which we're very much looking forward to. And overall, we feel that we are we continue to improve our ability to capture demand and satisfy a larger share of demand. So once the purchasing power of the of the household returns, we feel that we are in a very strong position. So with that being said, I'll thank you very much for the attention and hand it over for for any potential questions.

Thank you. Take us through the FTE increase and give us an indication of what functions you're strengthening at the moment. Please.

It's it's across all all parts of the organization. So a little bit most personal parts, but with multiple functions and a little bit of the the the warehouse functions with the order increase. We've needed a bit more resources there and and then on the office side as well, where we've we've had a few increases, for instance, in in the the team producing content. Since that is has been a large focus area during the during the last last year or so and in the little bit in technology and so forth. So there's there's a few different functions as some as we continue to evolve the organization with close to a 50 50 mix between the the operational side and the office.

Perfect. Thank you. I'm also interested in the restructuring costs specifically. You mentioned a figure of two and a half million, I believe. Could you perhaps break out the subcomponents of this figure and do you expect any cost savings moving ahead from this restructuring? I'm I'm trying to get a feeling for the sort of run rate cost base here.

Hmm. The. So we we had a reorganization in the in the purchasing and design with with the resignation of the of the lead in that function. The the second point, that's something we we communicate via press release towards towards the end of the quarter, somewhere around that time frame. And and then we we've all we're also in the in the process of we did a reorganization with the performance marketing team where we're establishing that in in the Berlin office. And previously those those resources were in the in the office and then and all of those. And calls. Or those affected those costs were were booked here at the end of the quarter. So those are off the off the books.

So if you say if you sum it up, you can say we have a seven million increase in personal costs and a little bit less than half of that is non recurring costs and a little bit more than half than its recurring costs.

Perfect. I've also thought a bit about your your assortment split graph. You've been talking about down trading for some time now, and I know to smaller share of rights within the 2005 5000 sec range. Could you talk a bit about this? Is this share of the assortment too expensive for bargain hunters while being too cheap for enthusiasts or what's happening here?

And it's the graph. This is a share of total SKUs. So the one one number that wasn't part of it is the total SKUs available to purchase and that has increased and primarily within the within the higher price ranges. So so with that being said, the number of items or articles to select from in this sort of the two and a half K range has remained relatively relatively consistent throughout the period. We we are, of course, continuously optimizing assortment and designs that we see aren't aren't aren't selling. They will be discontinued and then we add new new things for each season. So there will always be a little bit of seasonal variance. But but that is that is the explanation to to the visual aspect of that graph.

Perfect. Thank you. I wanted to ask one final question. I want to ask about your NPS score as well. Like 62 still world class it puts you up there with like Apple and the likes. But the NPS score has been a slight decline for the last couple of quarters. Do you have any comments on this at all?

Yes, the. We something we of course are working on on on an ongoing basis, but a large. Reese and one of the larger the large reasons for it is that we've had often on issues with with a few of our carrier partners where the. And the service level expectations from our perspective, as well as, of course, the customer expectations or perspective has not been has not been fulfilled. So that has has been been a major driver for for for that development.

All right. Fair enough. I'll get back in the queue. Thank you.

The next question comes from Victor Hansen from Carnegie. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Michael and Joakim. Couple of questions from my side. Firstly here, I'm curious about sales in your various geographies. So the Nordics performed much better than your other regions. And I'm wondering here, is this purely based on macro differences or how would you explain the relatively better sales growth in the Nordics? And you expect this trans to continue?

I mean, big, big portion of course is is is the is the macros. The what we kind of saw when if we call this sort of last one and a half to two years, a little bit of a recession almost. We saw that the the Nordic markets slowed down faster than the many of the other markets in Europe. And and now we're we're at least seeing that the Nordic region over the past couple of quarters have have outperformed most of the other markets in Europe. And there are within the in the rest of the rest of the world or rest of Europe, one or two markets that are still going quite strong. But but but that is the general general picture that we're seeing in terms of the Nordics being maybe a little bit of a leading indicator. Then in terms of the the lag between the Nordics and rest of Europe, it's still very difficult to to predict.

OK, understood. And then a second question here. You mentioned strong sales for outdoor rugs. I'm wondering if you could quantify how large this category is for you.

It's historically has been a very small share of of of the annual annual sales. And and we we essentially doubled it, doubled it last year and then this year also essentially grew it quite a bit. So it's now a significant portion of the of the sales within the within the especially during the summer period or spring, spring and summer period. We haven't given a specific number on the on the on the share total. But but it is a relevant portion of our sales, especially during the during the Q2 period. And and I think also one thing I'd like to to highlight when it comes to to the to the outdoor sort of it. It's items that are suitable for for outdoor use doesn't mean that they cannot be used also indoors. So we're also we saw we we did quite a few improvements to to that portion of the assortment last year already. And what we could see is that many of the best sellers within within that range continued to to to do well throughout the fall. So so we see that the consumers also find them suitable for for other purposes, especially in the in kitchen areas. Is what we're seeing.

Understood. Very helpful. And a final question here. I noticed that your average order values, they increase slightly sequentially compared to Q1. But do you think that AOV has bottomed out here or how should we view this?

Let's typically we we see that the average item values are higher during the during the fall and winter as there's a tendency for for for the consumers by slightly heavier, heavier runs. So whether the whether it's bottom bottomed out or not difficult to say. But if one looks at it from a typical quarter on quarter perspective, we should we should see it increase Q3 and Q4 compared to to where we ended up in Q2.

Perfect. That's all for me. Thank you.

There are no more phone questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions and closing comments.

So we have a few written questions. Yeah, okay. So so a couple of questions from from a model at Daneske. We are where the first question is related to our perspective on on AOV moving forward. And I think the what we just talked to Victor about essentially answers that.

So the next question is how has the development of the new domains progressed in terms of ranking high enough on Google to drive organic

traffic? And whether that is driving the lower marketing cost to sales ratio. And the answer to that is that there are no platform and work on and efforts to to build and publish content is is definitely improving our organic rankings and a large driver of the of the lower marketing to sales cost ratio. Because we continue to see a relatively intense climate within the within the paid traffic platforms such as such as Google and Google paid ads and our AdWords and and on on on the meta platforms. So we

have a question here from Adam. Do you experience that you have lost market share in the and or rest of Europe?

No, is the is the is the short answer. Then the the there's always nuances to that type of that type of questions. But but overall we feel that we're more than holding our own when it comes to the to the online online share. There have been dynamics in the in the in the marketplace during during the during the past past year that we've spoken about previously with specifically of course a very large and aggressive new market entrance and in TMO. And that has has been very aggressive across Europe in multiple product categories, including home interior products.

We have a question here from Steven. Given that the consumer confidence bottom out several quarters ago. Sure, we agree with that, though. How comes that you see the declined AOV now and not earlier?

Of course, I think the if we Sweden, of course, is a microcosmos and quite quite specific in terms of the how the household discretionary spend is is used and that where the where a very high share of the sort of monies into the household goes out for the And those like you like we all know, it takes a while before a couple of quarters before those those interest rates hikes actually affect even though the central banks change change the rates. It takes a couple of quarters or more, depending on how did the duration of the interest rates affecting. And that's a little bit Sweden and a few additional markets that have have that type of profile rest of Europe is very much where we're seeing a general inflation on many of the of the core core necessities when it comes to heating food, etc. And in that that's a I would say a big portion of the of the sort of lag we're seeing that people yes are a little bit more optimistic about the future, but still quite quite hesitant towards making larger single item purchases here now.

Okay. Do we have a question from Jonas feed. Staff cost is up almost 25% year on year, please be more specific, specific, what these new stuff will do to make your company better. How and when will this investment drive sales.

So, so we talked a little bit about that, where we, we have, of course, invested in in our, our content, content production functions, we and organic organic channels. We we are already seeing seeing that the benefits of that in terms of efficiency, especially where, of course, only in the in the early phases in terms of what we want to do within these within these areas when it comes to customer facing activities. And so, so I would argue that we are seeing the benefits of it already. And also, if you've kind of followed the the the experience and and content availability in our web shops, there's been a tremendous development in that area within the past 12 to 18 months, which is partly the new platform, but very much the the fact that we have have more resources to to produce content.

We have one more phone or two more from us. What can you in the current environment do to improve the average order value. Have you focused too much on budget products on site displays campaigns and so on.

I think the the topic in terms of growing, growing in a in a in a economy where where the where the spending power is lower is is always difficult. And that's that's that's for sure. I don't think if you start with the second portion of that question, have we focused too much on on the lower end, lower price points? No, I think is the is the short answer there. We've historically been under penetrated within that market segment and and during the past around about two years have improved our our position within within those price ranges. And doesn't mean that we haven't also made improvements to the to the other price price ranges, which we which we saw on one of the sites there. But in the in the current economy, the the consumers have selected to what to focus on the on the lower prices and or the the highly discounted items. And but what can be done on on the topic, of course, ensuring that and that we display and then merge on site merchandising in terms of the what we feel are relevant options for for the consumer. And we are working on on on topics such as average item, average items per basket and enduring the during the second quarter. And we have an additional feature on that in terms of ensuring that we recommend car antislips and carpet cleaners was introduced as part of the part of the purchase purchase journey. So so we are also working on that aspect.

And as a last question from Jonas, please describe the marketing cost environment in central and southern Europe during this quarter versus last year. How are the usual competitors behaving on customer product price? Any new competitor in the region? Question mark.

Talked a little bit about that both in QQ for and Q1. And I think one of very much reiterate many of those of those topics because they have very much been been part of the environment also here during during Q2. And and from a new so the new entrant in the in the market is is team one the where and I think anyone who follows on I retail to a certain degree has has has most likely seen the. The efforts they've done over the past past year to to to enter the European market on a very, very big scale. And that has has impacted the dynamics of the market where, of course, many, many have reacted and reacted in in two ways is what we've seen is that. They in the in the paid channels, they've increased their willingness to to spend both from a disability and and and of course, click price. In addition to having quite quite aggressive discount offers available in of external advertising as well as on inside the different web shops and and that is. And that is a little bit dynamic and despite this, I think it's a in it's an environment where we've had to to navigate this and and still year to date deliver more improve or lower marketing cost to sales ratio. And and that is very much driven based on the fact that we have a larger share of organic traffic and sales compared to compared to last year.

So we have what appears to be now at least the final question. It's from Philip. So in the markets that are not as heavily impacted by pressurized consumers, how does the AOV trend look in those markets? Are you confident that the decline in AOV is temporary?

We're very confident that the that AOV is affected by the by the price price sensitive consumer behavior. And that is for sure. Then and then I think the important thing for for us is to ensure that that we have have an assortment that attracts as large of a portion of the of the European customers as possible. And and that that people want to buy those those items and and of course that we have items priced across across all relevant price points besides maybe some of the very, very low ones. And and and with that being said, yes, increasing AOV could be beneficial, but but at the end of the day, we need to adapt to to what the consumers are willing to to spend and get make sure that our order economics remain profitable. And that our overall cost base and internal efficiencies and where marginal or variable cost profile adapts to to what the what the consumers are willing to spend and that we can maintain both. Yeah, maintain profitable growth also in in that type of environment, both on a whether it's temporary or not, it's difficult to say. And but we it is something that we need to need to adapt to to a large degree. Of course, there are certain certain things we can do to try to to to drive the slightly higher order value. But but at the end of the day, if a household has has the wallet or the budget to buy something for three hundred euros, it's very unlikely that they will end up buying something for seven hundred euros. So with that, that was the final question. So so with that being said, unless there are any other questions, no, the. So we again, I want to thank everybody for for the attention and look forward to meeting and talking to all of you again for our Q3 report. Thank you. Have a good day.