This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

Conifex Timber Inc.
3/27/2024
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Conifex Timber Inc. Q4 2023 Results Conference Call. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Ken Shields, the CEO and Chairman of the company. Please go ahead.
Well, thank you, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. I'm Ken Shields, as Chris mentioned, the Chair and CEO of Conifex, and I'm joined today by Chief Financial Officer Trevor Pruden and by President and Chief Operating Officer Andrew McCollum. Today I thought that I'd go through some prepared remarks that track the material in an accompanying slide deck that we distributed. So if you wish to follow along, you may wish to start at slide three in the deck. And slide three, of course, indicates the main topics we wish to cover today, which First of all, a description of how recent development has enabled our integrated sawmill and power generation site at McKenzie to migrate to a much lower and more enviable position on the North American softwood lumber industry cost curve. The second thing we want to cover is a review of the reasons we believe that recent mill closures and shift curtailment announcements in our operating region in the interior of BC has the potential to greatly enhance cash flow generation at McKenzie State. Third, we want to explain why we are confident we'll successfully secure new credit facilities that better align with our business plan. And lastly, we want to update you on a revenue diversification opportunity that we're considering that has the potential to strengthen companies. But before jumping into the details, let's quickly deal with a housekeeping item. We will be making forward-looking statements and references to non-IFRS measures, and therefore call your attention to the warning statement set out on pages 1 and 2 of the MD&As at least earlier today. Turning to our recent financial results, Slide four in the investor deck summarizes our Q4 and full year results. Our Q4 results were entirely consistent with the guidance we provided on our November call with you when we disclosed that although most lumber producers were likely to report sequentially weaker results in Q4 of 23 than in Q3 of 23, at Conifers we expected our results to improve. For Q4 of 23, we reported negative EBITDA of $3.5 million, which of course is 48% better than the negative EBITDA of 6.7 million we reported for Q3. Looking ahead to Q1 of 2024, we expect to show further substantial improvement, of course, and looking beyond Q1 and assuming that our power plant and sawmill operate as planned, and also assuming that the cash SPF prices that are implicit in lumber futures contracts of around $500 U.S. per thousand board feet, assuming these prices materialize, we expect to report double-digit positive EVA DA in 2024. Slide 5 reminds all of us as to how the saw log fiber sourcing restrictions that we abided by between 2018 and 2022 damaged our competitiveness. Back then, the Chief Forester mandated that 55% of our saw log harvest in the McKenzie Timber Supply Area, or TSA, had to be sourced from dead and dying beetle-killed sands. This salvage harvest requirement was not relaxed when the chief forester announced in 2020 that 70% of the fiber volume in salvage stands had lost its commercial value as a saw log and was more properly classified as pulpwood or bioenergy size. So you can imagine how excited we all were on May 4, 2023, when the Keith Forrester allowed us to transition to a green log diet. Although our transition to a green log diet is not yet fully complete, many initial benefits, such as improved sawmill productivity, higher lumber grade outcomes, and more lucrative lumber selling price realizations, showed up in Q4 of 2023. And those factors, of course, enabled us to report a sequentially reduced EBITDA loss. Summing up to this point, the Chief Forrester's decision to eliminate the salvage harvest requirement in the McKenzie TSA has enabled us to migrate to a lower and more enviable position on the North American softwood lumber industry cost curve, And as a matter of interest, slide six in the deck we distributed today includes the benchmarking analysis that the CONIFX management team shared with the CONIFX Board of Directors earlier today. Looking ahead, we sense that SDF supplies are contracting at the same time SPS demand is building, and we therefore believe that lumber prices are going higher. As set out in slide seven of our deck, you'll see that the log harvest in the entire region of BC, which totaled 47 million cubic meters in 2018, plummeted to 27 million cubic meters in 2023. The Ministry of Forests also discloses in the most recent budget document that it expects the interior BC log harvest to amount to roughly 26 million cubic meters annually for the year that is just about to end and for the ensuing three years. This harvest contraction will reduce SPF lumber production from the interior region of BC by about 4.8 or 4.9 billion board seat annually. And this supply contraction is huge. It's equivalent to something like 8% of North American softwood lumber consumption. And it's also equivalent to offset the incremental softwood lumber supply from something like 20 new industrial-scale sawmills that could be brought on stream in the U.S. South. So with mounting evidence that U.S. housing starts increasing in 2024 and 2025, our view of the supply demand dynamics and SPS is that we're entering a period of rising lumber prices. Besides having a positive effect on lumber prices, one consequence of the recently announced funeral closures set out on slide seven is the potential for the remaining saw mills operating in the interior region of BC to move to an even lower position on the North American lumber industry cost curve. With fewer mills operating, it follows that there will be fewer bidders for purchased wood at BCTS auctions. And this could have the effect of keeping bid prices and therefore stumpage rates in BC at more affordable levels. The mills that continue to operate should continue to enjoy steady demand and pricing for residual chips and other co-products of the manufacturing process. We also sense that the remaining mills operating will have opportunities to sell greater percentages of their output to the high-value J-grade lumber market that's available to us in Japan on a duty-free basis. All these outcomes can combine, in our view, to enable Interior BC Mills to migrate to an even more enviable position on the North American softwood lumber industry class curve. As mentioned in slide eight, We operate the only sawmill complex in the McKenzie TSA. The McKenzie TSA is the fourth largest in D.C. In terms of geographic footprint, the TSA is equivalent in size to the combined land area of the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, and Connecticut. Effective May 4th of last year, the chief forester in D.C. established the allowable annual cut, or the AAC, or the McKenzie TSA at 2.39 million cubic meters. Since our sawmill consumption averages out at around 800,000 cubic meters annually, it follows that the harvest level in our fiber catchment area is nearly three times our consumption of climate. We are not aware of any other TSA in the interior region of D.C. that has a comparable level of saw log self-sufficiency. We believe the relative advantages of being in a fiber surplus region will only increase going forward. Those of you on the line know that delivered log costs represent the vast majority of operating costs, and that delivered log costs are going to be a key driver of Conifex's ability to achieve best-in-class economics. in the interior region of BC's lumber sector. Simply put, the log quality, cost, and availability tailwinds we have in McKenzie, in our opinion, will enable us to report greatly improved operating results through the balance of 2024 and beyond. Our number one priority for Q2 of 2024 is to arrange new credit facilities for our saw log harvesting and lumber manufacturing businesses. Our power business is separately and appropriately financed. Against this backdrop, we've engaged Raymond James to advise and assist us to secure approximately $40 million in credit facilities supported by a strong collateral base, including working capital, the fixed assets in our lumber business, our tenures, and other assets. Considering the security we have available to support the credit facilities and our conservative financial leverage, we believe we will meet all reasonable requirements for prospective debt capital providers put on the table for consideration. Looking at our stock for a moment, we trade at less than 25% of book value per share and continue to believe that our stock is undervalued on an absolute basis and acutely so relative to our lumber peers, some of whom trade at much lower discounts. In fact, all of them trade at much lower discounts than we do. We also wish to draw your attention to the fact that potentially refundable export duties that we have on deposit with the U.S. Department of Commerce amount to approximately $46 million Canadian, which exceeds $26 million equity market capitalization by 75%. Turning to revenue diversification opportunities, on previous calls we disclosed how we intend to leverage our power expertise to develop industrial scale power infrastructure that customers and operators of next generation data centers require. We believe many data center customers are interested in locating in D.C. because of our province's affordable green power. Regrettably, the provincial cabinet issued an order in council denying us electricity interconnection services at two locations where we were intending to develop multipurpose next-generation data centers. We challenged the order in council in the Supreme Court of BC. The Supreme Court judge agreed with us that the provincial cabinet does not have the power to impose a permanent moratorium on interconnection service, but the judge agreed with the province that a temporary moratorium could be applied. We disagree with that decision and are therefore appealing the decision. We intend to use the EBITDA we're currently generating from the trial program we have underway to fund the cost of the appeal. The stakes of this case are immense for everybody in BC. Next-generation data centers developed can drive economic growth. It can spur job creation and achieve those outcomes, especially in rural areas. Providing power to ConFX enables BC Hydro to, number one, lower the rate it charges its other customers. Number two, strengthen the resiliency of the provincial energy grid. Number three, reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. And number four, propel the adoption of First Nations-sponsored solar and wind energy projects. This is why we believe the provincial cabinet's unauthorized action jeopardizes all the benefits being made available to British Columbians, and this explains why we believe we have little choice but to challenge the legal validity of the moratorium. In conclusion, thank you for your interest in Conifex. Andrew, Trevor, and I look forward to responding to any questions that analysts and shareholders may have. And we look forward to turning the meetings back to Chris, our operator.
Thank you. Please press star 1 at this time if you have a question. When prompted by the system, please clearly state your name to register your question. There will be a pause while participants register for questions. Thank you for your patience. Once again, please press star 1 on your device's keypad if you have a question. We will take the first question. Please go ahead.
Yes, hello. Thank you for taking my question. So, considering that the stock is undervalued, have you considered to sell the business and just returning the money to shareholders? Thank you.
Okay. Well, I'm sorry I didn't catch your name. Our view is that this is not an appropriate time to consider a prospective change of control transaction. And there are two main reasons that lead us to that conclusion. The first conclusion and reason is We talked about the chief forester setting a new harvest level determination, but it's customary after the harvest levels are determined that there's what's called an apportionment decision whereby the Ministry of Forests decides how all the licensees in an area will have access to the annual harvest, and any party that wanted to do a detailed due diligence examination of Conifex timber would want to have the benefit of an apportionment decision before they started work in that area. So, the first reason your suggestion is inappropriate is that there's more work to be done. The second reason is that we understand that the last two initiatives that were launched for marketing saw log harvesting and lumber companies in North America, despite extensive canvases by qualified financial agents and advisors, both of them ended up unsuccessfully and there were no transactions. So we don't think that the market conditions are right. So it's against that backdrop that we believe that with the passage of time that the incredibly robust fiber baskets supporting our lumber manufacturing business are going to pay big dividends going forward and that this ability we have to further leverage our power electric power infrastructure management, but also provide additional revenue streams and cash flow streams to that. So we're very comfortable building out our existing asset base. So that's the long answer to the question you posed, but thank you for posing it.
Thank you.
Thank you. The next question, please go ahead.
Brian Weber. Yeah. Hi. Um, just a question on sort of the refinancing. Um, you know, I guess you were talking about, uh, being optimistic sort of with the Raymond James being able to refinance it, but is there any more details you can provide? I mean, it's just like another line of credit you're looking for with Raymond James to replace the Wells Fargo facility. Are you like, I'm guessing you don't need to raise equity at these prices. Like, I'm just curious sort of like how you're thinking about, um, Okay.
Well, we're, Obviously, we're in the very early stages, and it's just today that prospective debt capital providers will have access to our December 31st 2023 financial statements. But our credit facility with Wells Fargo was a $25 million ABL facility. But, of course, there were limits on the amount of funds on the value of the inventories and receivables, and so effectively we had access to probably one-half of the face amount. So that facility we'd like to refinance. But on the other hand, we are very unique in the sense that our timber tenures and the fixed assets supporting our lumber manufacturing business And our timber canyons, those are not pledged to any lender. And we think those assets are worth, you know, $60 million to $80 million, somewhere in that range. And so we'd like to get a term loan possibly in the amount of, say, $20 million. So, you know, if we wanted to keep it to the nearest $10 million, a package of roughly $20 million in term loans, coupled with $20 million in ABL facilities, we believe would put us in a very solid ongoing financial position. And if one of the facilities was modified by $5 or $10 million and the other one was adjusted to compensate for the modification, we think we'd be in a very viable ongoing financial position.
Okay, thank you. And then I guess the original press release when you were talking about the financing a few weeks ago, you were having to refinance the power term loan at some point. Is that still on the table, or do you feel confident with the financing for that?
Well, the understanding we have with our power lender is that... They are very interested in becoming acquainted with who the primary lender is to our harvesting and lumber business. And if they're uncomfortable with that, they would like us to consider refinancing our power plant. At the same time that that's going on, we have some opportunities to further leverage our electric power industry expertise and consider some add-on businesses in that area. So we're looking forward to our plan, simply put, is to settle the financing for our harvesting and lumber business and then enter into discussions with our power plant lenders to talk about what our multi-year plans are to build out that business and see what sort of fit there is with our power lender and our lender business lender and take a look at some options as for in 2025.
Okay, thank you. And my last question, if you're not successful on the appeal with the power business that you're trying to do with the data warehouses or whatever, what's the plan, I guess, after that?
Well, we've done a trial basis, and on our trial basis, it's been successful. We invested less than half a million dollars in the trial and we generated EBITDA equal to our initial investment, so we've achieved payout on that. We think that there's a whole series of common law precedents for a monopoly provider having an obligation to serve as customer. So we think that we have an entitlement to power here in D.C. and plan to build that business. And we think that with the passage of time, the courts will agree with us and we'll have a chance to build out that business. But, you know, there's always a chance. that there will be impediments to it, and we won't be able to do it. But I share that thinking with you on that, and we plan to be, you know, underlending in our development of this business opportunity.
Thank you. Thank you. There are no further questions registered at this time. I would now like to turn the meeting back over to Mr. Shields.
Okay. Well, Chris, thanks for doing a good job coordinating our call today. We covered a lot of material in my prepared remarks, and I thought those were very thoughtful questions. So thanks, all of you, for listening, and enjoy the rest of your afternoon.
Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.